Well, as I told you, it's not about doing the first thing at all, and never has been, and it is about obliging web sites to provide the second thing, and successfully follow through if they provide it.
As opposed to a two-way Mars mission, where the Mars they visit is a tropical paradise? While I don't necessarily agree with the mission idea, the pitch is that most of the problems that have to be solved to get to Mars in the first place (spending a long time in a lifeless void) are the same problems that would have to be solved to leave the passengers there (spending a long time in a lifeless desert), with the considerable benefit that you don't have to haul the resources for a return trip.
I don't know where you got the impression that this was about a right to completely scrub oneself from every server on the internet with a magic button. It's about the right to tell a web site, to which you have previously provided information, that it must remove that information.
Yeah, it's a suicide mission on paper, but if you spend half of the mission time going around solving their personal problems and buying stuff to upgrade the space ship, then everyone gets out OK.
Yes, that's why he qualified the noun phrase "Apple TV" with "much-rumoured", to make it clear to those of at least a basic level of English comprehension that he was referring to the other, rumoured Apple TV product.
While I agree with your point about biology - living things strongly couple to each other in remarkably complex ways - asteroids and debris on the rocky planets are (compared to Earth) completely pristine due to the inertness of their environment, and the processes they are subject to are blissfully easy to model and use in interpretation.
Re:We all know what will happen
on
Lake Vostok Reached
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
You have clearly never watched one of the finest movies ever made.
Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.
It wasn't homeopathy in Jobs' case, it was some sort of special dietary regimen.
I've heard the argument that Jobs was unlucky enough to have a form of the cancer that probably would've have been much better with earlier treatment; that probably doesn't apply to most.
The last ten years have not been a good time for the metaphorical pipeline. I'm not sure what's goign to replace it - startups, spinoffs, and publicly funded grand challenges, probably - but business isn't cutting it.
While I agree that the pharmaceutical businesses is a complete disaster area in terms of cures-per-dollar, you can't point at one publicly funded study and use it as evidence of that fact. It's spectacularly irrational.
It doesn't have one. The mixture of wavelengths isn't even well-defined. It's any light with a spectrum that more-or-less evenly activates the different photoreceptors in the eye. And being "dark grey" it's of low intensity.
It receives more light, but it's actually a relatively dark grey colour so it's not very bright to look at. It seems bright at night, of course, but that's just because it's sunlit and everything around you isn't.
How about, when they want to use someone's music as their theme tune, they ask them first? Throw a few cents their way? Maybe think about not being a dick, in addition to whether their actions are legally defensible?
Fair use is slippery. There are situations where reproducing a whole text would be considered fair use, and situations where reproducing just a snippet would not be. In this instance a very distinctive part of the song is being used, promotionally, uncritically, and without modification so I'm not sure it really escapes.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, as I told you, it's not about doing the first thing at all, and never has been, and it is about obliging web sites to provide the second thing, and successfully follow through if they provide it.
As opposed to a two-way Mars mission, where the Mars they visit is a tropical paradise? While I don't necessarily agree with the mission idea, the pitch is that most of the problems that have to be solved to get to Mars in the first place (spending a long time in a lifeless void) are the same problems that would have to be solved to leave the passengers there (spending a long time in a lifeless desert), with the considerable benefit that you don't have to haul the resources for a return trip.
I don't know where you got the impression that this was about a right to completely scrub oneself from every server on the internet with a magic button. It's about the right to tell a web site, to which you have previously provided information, that it must remove that information.
Video from the investor meeting.
Poor Mr. Hackenbacker. :(
Yeah, it's a suicide mission on paper, but if you spend half of the mission time going around solving their personal problems and buying stuff to upgrade the space ship, then everyone gets out OK.
Yes, that's why he qualified the noun phrase "Apple TV" with "much-rumoured", to make it clear to those of at least a basic level of English comprehension that he was referring to the other, rumoured Apple TV product.
While I agree with your point about biology - living things strongly couple to each other in remarkably complex ways - asteroids and debris on the rocky planets are (compared to Earth) completely pristine due to the inertness of their environment, and the processes they are subject to are blissfully easy to model and use in interpretation.
You have clearly never watched one of the finest movies ever made.
AWACS? Galaxy transport full of servers? 747 carrying military intel all-star weightlifting team?
Believe it or not, there are shades of grey between "I don't want 4chan dabbling in national security" and "I am a genocidal totalitarian".
Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.
It wasn't homeopathy in Jobs' case, it was some sort of special dietary regimen.
I've heard the argument that Jobs was unlucky enough to have a form of the cancer that probably would've have been much better with earlier treatment; that probably doesn't apply to most.
That should've been "business as usual".
The last ten years have not been a good time for the metaphorical pipeline. I'm not sure what's goign to replace it - startups, spinoffs, and publicly funded grand challenges, probably - but business isn't cutting it.
If you're pointing at "a larger body of studies" you're not pointing at one study any more, are you?
That seems a little unlikely given how distinct they are in progression and histology.
The links to the peer-reviewed papers are in the fucking article.
While I agree that the pharmaceutical businesses is a complete disaster area in terms of cures-per-dollar, you can't point at one publicly funded study and use it as evidence of that fact. It's spectacularly irrational.
We have this thing called "luminance" that often distinguishes one colour from another.
And I'm trying to avoid any confusion for people who interpret the word "bright" as appearing bright versus being well-illuminated.
It doesn't have one. The mixture of wavelengths isn't even well-defined. It's any light with a spectrum that more-or-less evenly activates the different photoreceptors in the eye. And being "dark grey" it's of low intensity.
It receives more light, but it's actually a relatively dark grey colour so it's not very bright to look at. It seems bright at night, of course, but that's just because it's sunlit and everything around you isn't.
And twelve months, if we're to believe it was 2010 last year.
How about, when they want to use someone's music as their theme tune, they ask them first? Throw a few cents their way? Maybe think about not being a dick, in addition to whether their actions are legally defensible?
Fair use is slippery. There are situations where reproducing a whole text would be considered fair use, and situations where reproducing just a snippet would not be. In this instance a very distinctive part of the song is being used, promotionally, uncritically, and without modification so I'm not sure it really escapes.