Slashdot Mirror


Chinese Boy Claims To Have Cat-Like Night Vision

Oswald McWeany writes "Reports swirling around the Internet are that a boy in China may have cat-like night vision. The boy with eerie blue-eyes was able to fill out a questionnaire in the dark and his eyes reflect like a cat's when a light is shined on them. No reports yet if he marks his territory or is litter box trained."

171 comments

  1. Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blue eyes? He just uses prescience to find if the answers he's about to write down are correct, much like Paul Muad-Dib the God-Emperor did later in his life. Nothing new here

    1. Re:Blue eyes? by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Or he is just using his fingers to feel the patterns of thickly printed ink on the form.

    2. Re:Blue eyes? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      The questionnaire was a Foxconn job application. He's certified to work on the low-light factory floor which is under development so the employees won't really be able to see how bad they have it. /sarcasm

    3. Re:Blue eyes? by durrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or it could be unregulated gene manipulation, this being china and all.
      Which would totally fucking awsome.

    4. Re:Blue eyes? by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Where do I get me some freaky blue night-vision eyes?

    5. Re:Blue eyes? by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't he be denied work there because he can see how bad he really has it?

    6. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed.

      Where do I get me some freaky blue night-vision eyes?

      First you gotta kill a few people...
      And then you get sent to a prison where they tell you you'll never see daylight again. So you dig up a doctor, pay him twenty menthol Kools to do a surgical shine job on your eyes

    7. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you so much.

    8. Re:Blue eyes? by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      One of my favorites Sci-Fi movies... the sequel? Not so much.

    9. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paul Muad-Dib is not the God-Emperor. God Emperor was Leto II, Paul's son.

    10. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta kill a few people.
      Then you get sent to the slam where they tell you that you will never see daylight again.
      Then something about a doctor.

      So, in other words, just be a bad ass and threaten to remove a persons lower region with a sewing needle and enjoy your new eyes.

    11. Re:Blue eyes? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or he is just using his fingers to feel the patterns of thickly printed ink on the form.

      Er, no. The obvious answer is that being cat-like, he shares their well-developed olfactory system, and hence reads by sense of smell.

      Also, he sure plays a mean pinball.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:Blue eyes? by jefe7777 · · Score: 2

      the hair on the back of my neck just stood up.

      and applauded.

    13. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blue in blue eyes.

    14. Re:Blue eyes? by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      There on hints on Vin Diesel's Facebook page that he's working on a new Riddick film now. This is excellent timing. :D

    15. Re:Blue eyes? by DaveyJJ · · Score: 1

      Where do I get me some freaky blue night-vision eyes?

      Hannibal Chew?

      --
      DaveyJJ
    16. Re:Blue eyes? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I read 'pinball' as 'hairball' for a second and now I'm disappointed that's not what you actually said.

    17. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing new. I have photos of my eyes reflecting light back as described above. I also have excellent night vision such that I'm normally able to move about in the dark while most everyone else is stuck, rooted in place for fear of tripping. My eyes are also blue. The down side is, a bright sunny day can cause my eyes to tear up like crazy, even temporarily blinding me. And if fatigued, its much, much worse, literally making it difficult to keep my eyes open. Sun glasses and/or filtered lenses are a must.

      Having said all that, it does sound like his vision is a remarkable step even beyond mine. If so, I'd be interested to hear if he suffers from all the issues I do during the day - and then some.

    18. Re:Blue eyes? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Well played sir, I was NOT expecting a pinball wizard reference.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    19. Re:Blue eyes? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2

      I don't think China is as bad as Slashdot claims. But if it is, they'd probably prefer to clone him so they can hire a bunch of workers that don't require them to pay the energy bill for lights.

    20. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he is just using his fingers to feel the patterns of thickly printed ink on the form.

      Or, maybe it's just bullshit. But no, it must be true, Youtube is proof, and it was "investigated" by the prestigious "Life's Little Mysteries" people (cat lady, bag woman, and the shopping trolley man) - what was I "thinking"?

    21. Re:Blue eyes? by Professr3 · · Score: 1

      Teacup. You threaten to remove a person's lower region with your teacup.

    22. Re:Blue eyes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think it is and it isn't.

      I saw a great story recently...well kind of a sad story, but with some upsides, about Chinas manafacturing by someone who went there and saw the factories and even secretly met with Chineese labor unions (illegal)...did you know that despite unions being illegal, they have had strikes? I expect we will see more from the Chinese labor movement, in time.

      http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/454/mr-daisey-and-the-apple-factory

      Amazing story on several levels, especially the observation about how we say we like hand made things, well....everything is hand made. Really, that ipad? Hand made....

      -Steve

  2. not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is entirely within the normal operating parameters of a cat to have been litter box trained, and also occasionally mark it's territory.

    I though I would offer this, as many readers of the summary might assume otherwise.

    1. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Litter box trained is actually sort of a misnomer. You don't have to train a cat to use a litter box just show it to them. It is the preference of a cat to use a clean, pleasant smelling, dry, powdery and easily dug location for their business and the litter box is generally the best location they are going to find. Although in a pinch a potted plant will do.

    2. Re:not mutually exclusive by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      I have a catgenie 120, and one of the two cats likes to sleep in it after it runs through the cycle.. Not sure what happens when the other cat wants to use it while the first cat is sleeping.

    3. Re:not mutually exclusive by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      Most cats are trained at a very young age by their mother to use a litterbox. Although they instinctively prefer something with the qualities of a litterbox, there is some training involved in most cases.

    4. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 2

      I have a feeder for stray cats and often let them use my garage in the colder parts of winter along with a litter box. No training required and I have first hand knowledge at this point that these are cats that are on at least their third generation of being born outside and living feral.

    5. Re:not mutually exclusive by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      So they're separated from their mother before they can walk? Otherwise, she's the one training them to use anything that resembles a litter box. If nothing else resembles a litterbox except for the litterbox, then that's what they'll use.

    6. Re:not mutually exclusive by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with this. My wife came across a stray that was abandoned by its mother just after birth. Poor thing was still wet and hadn't opened his eyes, yet. We took him in, fed him, etc. We weren't cat people before this, and weren't sure how to "encourage" him to use the kitty sand, but when he saw it he just "knew" how to use it.

    7. Re:not mutually exclusive by Gilmoure · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or a roommate's shoes.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:not mutually exclusive by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Most cats are trained at a very young age by their mother to use a litterbox.

      My cats never knew their mother but they still figured it out by themselves. They're eight years old now and never did anything outside the litter tray. Not once.

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:not mutually exclusive by shaitand · · Score: 4, Informative

      So your stance is that mother cats who have no particular reason to prefer a litter box over the dirt in the yard (and may have never seen a litter box), teach the kittens to use a litter box... even when there is no litter box to teach them with? How do you explain that kittens acquired just after weaning also use a litter box automatically?

      Cats instinctively dislike being messy, wet, and waste odors. Just as all cats instinctively pick at food in a delicate and selective manner and in general take almost every action in a careful deliberate way unless panicked. They all have a COMPULSION to chase and stalk that is triggered by certain movement patterns. I don't know that anyone has made a deliberate study of incubating a kitten from birth and keeping it in isolation from other cats into adulthood but it seems unlikely that every cat from the first evolution of cat to modern day has passed on the exact same training in this regard. Nature is a far simpler solution in this regard than nurture and therefore all else being equal is most likely correct.

      That said, I do concede that cats definitely do teach one another even when they aren't mother cats. If you succeed in toilet training one cat in the house it will most likely teach the others. The same with using cat doors and other tricks. In some respects despite not being pack animals cats are actually quite social. I haven't seen dogs teaching one another advanced behaviors like this.

      I would even concede there are aspects of waste disposal that are likely trained. Burying behavior seems to be in my observation. Some cats bury in a deep and carefully buried hole, others just toss back a couple pawfuls of dirt. Generally these behaviors seem to be common to cats from the same litter but they aren't static. Some cats change behavior in this respect and that may be because they learn from other cats or just that they discover on their own that they prefer the results of a deep careful bury.

    10. Re:not mutually exclusive by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Not sure what happens when the other cat wants to use it while the first cat is sleeping.

      As the GP implied, don't look too closely at your plant pots.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    11. Re:not mutually exclusive by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Go read my original post. I covered the fact that it's instinctive, but is usually helped along by the mother.

    12. Re:not mutually exclusive by cmotdibbl3r · · Score: 1

      My housemate had an obese (26 pd) neutered cat. He always used the litter box but he was so huge that a couple of times we found found poop on the floor because his read was hanging over the litter tray.

    13. Re:not mutually exclusive by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      As the GP implied, don't look too closely at your plant pots.

      Or your stereo headphones.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    14. Re:not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I trained my male cat to piss in the toilet.

      Take a thick piece of cardboard, stick it between the bowl and the toilet seat and cut around to make it a neat fit. Then cut a circle in the center of whats left that just fits a colander, and mount the colander in the middle so it's hovering over the water in the toilet bowl. Fill the colander with kitty litter and leave it there for them to find. If they don't use it, wait a little longer than usual to change their normal litter, so it's gross and they don't want to use it. Once they get used to using the litter box built into the toilet, gradually put a little less litter in the toilet bowl each time you change it, until eventually there isn't any, but they're still going to the toilet. Then take the whole apparatus away.

      Saves on litter costs, and lets you brag about how smart your cat is.

    15. Re:not mutually exclusive by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      . . . and some cats just drop a bomb on the floor a foot in front of the litter box. . .

    16. Re:not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This guy knows his cat shit.

    17. Re:not mutually exclusive by gtall · · Score: 1

      ...they are FUNNY cats!!

    18. Re:not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And some cats, like one of mine, know that they're supposed to do something after they drop a bomb, put they're not sure what, so they just paw at anything, including the wall next to the litter box, then walk away.

      The other cat, being a compulsive digger and buryer, used to be driven nuts by this behaviour and would generally be in the litter box immediately afterward to take care of the mess that had just been left behind.

    19. Re:not mutually exclusive by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I liked Cracked.com's description of litterbox training (paraphrase)

      "Teaching a cat to use a litter box is a simple two step process:
      1) Show them the litter box.
      2) That's it.
      "

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    20. Re:not mutually exclusive by dissy · · Score: 2

      In some respects despite not being pack animals cats are actually quite social. I haven't seen dogs teaching one another advanced behaviors like this.

      To add to your informative comment, I can say I have at least in one case seen this with two dogs as well, both previous pets of mine.

      I had an older lab, actually she was my step fathers originally, but became mine once he passed away.

      Now I must admit, she was a retired police dog when my step father got her, and already knew quite a few verbal and physical commands. She was quite bright for a dog.

      Unfortunately my step father did not treat her particularly well.
      I mean he loved her to death and was wonderful in playing with her and giving attention. But he basically fed her whatever he was eating. Very bad for a dog :/

      She developed diabetes, and from that further problems. She was over weight, and had a tendency to develop bed sores from inactivity.
      At one point she seemed ready to give up on life, as dogs tend to do when they know their time is near. But she was still relatively young, and had hope left.
      I exercised her as much as she would stand for, and had a very hard time adjusting her diet to something more healthy. She all but refused most dry dog food, and with her weight wanted to be lazy, which just makes the problem worse...

      Anyways, after awhile i got the idea that perhaps getting another puppy would help matters in a few ways. Both motherly instincts to kick in, as well as competing for more attention. The new dog was a pound puppy, and I got her very young, only a few weeks old.
      Low and behold, the plan actually worked! She lived another 3 years, and was a little over 10 when I had to have her put down due to a tumor growing behind her brain :{

      One of the skills she had and taught the puppy, was knowing where our yard boundary was.
      The back yard is fenced, but the front is not at all. My house also shares a front yard with the house to my south (Each of our driveways are on the far side, and other than mow lines, no distinction between them.) No sidewalk between yard and street either.

      The older dog knew where she could go, and where not to go. She knew where the mow line should be and would Not cross it without looking back at me for my OK.

      She taught the puppy the yard rules, taught her the same way to get attention to be let out back, and the puppy mostly learned the same furniture rules from the older dogs actions.

      I did teach the puppy some verbal commands, although she never had the same vocabulary as the police dog.
      Also another strange thing, when I gave the older dog hand orders, the puppy would copy them. She didn't exactly learn the hand orders, as after Brandy was put down, she never really followed them again. Instead she would look around for Brandy, I assume to copy what she was doing. I quickly stopped the few she did recognize, as it wasn't a pleasant memory for the either of us...
      But it seemed she learned to do the same action, even if only as expected from the older dog.

      But other than a tiny amount of reeducation on furniture rules when puppy grew up (after my other dog was gone), everything she learned had stayed with her through out her life.
      By reeducation, that is to say puppys on your lap on the couch is cute. Bigger dogs, not at all so much heh

      The puppy lived to a ripe age of 12, and those were two of the smartest dogs I've ever interacted with and had the pleasure of having in my life.

      So maybe not a common case, but I wanted to toss my experience out there to share.

      I gather you are more a cat person than a dog person, but in case you were curious:
      Puppy , and when older
      (Yes that was her couch! :)
      Sadly I have no digital pictures of the older retired police dog, and seems a bit much to scan one in just for this post

    21. Re:not mutually exclusive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And some cats, like one of mine, know that they're supposed to do something after they drop a bomb, put they're not sure what, so they just paw at anything, including the wall next to the litter box, then walk away.

      The other cat, being a compulsive digger and buryer, used to be driven nuts by this behaviour and would generally be in the litter box immediately afterward to take care of the mess that had just been left behind.

      AAAAND...the first cat knows that.

  3. And there you were... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 5, Funny

    And there you were complaining about all the toxic waste that cheap manufacturing and lax environment laws in China.

    We could have blue-eyed sightseeing children here in the US, but, OH NO, you had to have cheap iPhones!!

    1. Re:And there you were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but imagine what other kinds of mutants the Chinese have discovered and aren't telling us about!

    2. Re:And there you were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blue-eyed sightseeing children

      Did you mean "nightseeing"? It's one hell of a Freudian slip to accidentally say "sightseeing" when talking about Chinese people.

    3. Re:And there you were... by felipekk · · Score: 1

      Ha! I bet the Mayas didn't think we would have night-vision capable humans by now! Maybe 2012 will not be the end of the world after all!

  4. What are the chances? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 3, Informative

    From an evolutionary standpoint, I would think such a radical mutation impossible, unless his family has been selectively breeding for night vision for thousands of years.

    I suspect instead this is just sensationalism and the boy has moderately better vision in low light, without the reflective light collection mechanisms that exist in other animals.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    1. Re:What are the chances? by FudRucker · · Score: 2

      maybe a dormant gene went active, if they find it that would be cool if anyone could go to a doctor's office and get gene therapy and after a couple of visits to a doctor BAM! you got night vision too

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:What are the chances? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      If, and only if, you also had your iris recalibrated to handle the higher sensitivity...

      I'm by no means in genetic-freak-vision territory; but even with merely good low light vision and pale blue eyes, going into sunlight downright hurts for a few minutes until a combination of squinting and iris closure gets the light levels back to acceptable.

      You Would. Not. Want. to be the poor sucker who suddenly acquires inhuman low-light sensitivity without the accompanying optical gizmos for handling daylight...

    3. Re:What are the chances? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Iris closure happens in seconds. What you are experiencing is a secondry, slow method by which the eye adapts to different light levels. The concentration of rhodopsin is actually changing. Light breaks it down, but the photosensitive cells continually regenerate it - so when you're in the dark, levels build up and increase sensitivity.

    4. Re:What are the chances? by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That isn't how mutation works. There does not need to be a goal for something to happen. This could be the result of a single gene affecting the expression of many proteins, or it could be a mutation that activated some of the dormant genetic material.

    5. Re:What are the chances? by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

      Except as the geneticist in TFA pointed out, it isn't 1 gene, its many, many.

      They all produce some change, which is why evolution takes time to produce features or turn them on (and why, say, large portions of the population don't have a mutation to produce Vitamin C). There isn't just a magic switch to turn on adaptations, regardless if our ancestors might have had a trait in the past.

      It took many generations to lose traits incrementally, and will be the same when getting them back in the same way.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    6. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think that all advancements in evolution happen because of "selective breeding"? Please, let the adults discuss science.

    7. Re:What are the chances? by ByOhTek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From an evolutionary standpoint, I would think such a radical mutation impossible

      From a reading-that-statement standpoint, I would think you having more than minimal education in the biological sciences would be impossible.

      Mutations are a contributing factor to evolution, not a sole cause of it, or caused by it. There is no "evolutionary standpoint" on a single mutation occuring.

      That being said, it may be an *unlikely* mutation, but with over 7billion people, quite a few people will have rather unlikely mutations. And a single point mutation could conceivably cause a change the density of photoreceptor in the eye, how good they are at capturing photons (the human eye "sees" only about 4-5% of the photons that pass through it).

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    8. Re:What are the chances? by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and even a cat who could read and write could not "complete[..] a writing test in a pitch-black stairwell" - they need *some* light to see.

      This silly piece is nothing but sensationalism and should not be on Slashdot.

    9. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without incredibly shortsighted tinkering on our part, you mean. ;)

    10. Re:What are the chances? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      For a few minutes?

      My friend, the pain does not stop until the sun goes away (or you just put on sunglasses)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:What are the chances? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      The Chinese LOVE these kind of stunts (like the absurd claims regarding "Chi") "Monks" who use electric drills on their bodies or use a sweaty palm to pick up a large jar, etc. The Han/Communist Chinese seem to find it necessary to make extravagant claims about almost everything!

      Bigger
      Better
      First
      Faster
      Older
      Longer

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    12. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can be born with freakishly weird sets of arms and legs.

      Some are born freakishly tall.

      Some have been born with hair all over their bodies

      Some have been born with all sorts of other weird mutations gone too far.

      What's to say this isn't one of those cases?
      For all we know, we may have already had such a gene that has slowly been phased out OVER thousands and thousands of generations. (likely longer of course)
      We know human echo location exists now. So it isn't that far out to expect night vision stuffery to have happened through all that time too.

    13. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      going into sunlight downright hurts for a few minutes

      Uh.. yeah, that's pretty normal. It's why people with old NVG's on scream when a flash goes off.

      pale blue eyes

      What's with all the assumptions that the colour of the eyes has any relation to their ability to see?

      Can any geneticists weigh in on this?

    14. Re:What are the chances? by Phernost · · Score: 2

      Your statement is not completely correct. It is possible for a single mutation to effect multiple genes and sections of DNA. These mutations need only occurs in the dark DNA, or junk DNA whichever you prefer. Remember only about 1.5% of the human genome is protein coding exons. How many are silent genes? How many are broken? All questions needing answers.

      A programming analogy might be to say a program is DNA. Running the binutils program “stings” over that program displays all it's possible proteins. These proteins can be easily identify yet they are not the main decider of the program's functioning. On second thought, this analogy might not be that good, but it should cover the general idea.

      It is possible for a single mutation to switch on Vitamin C production, it is just highly unlikely. DNA is very good at copying, and breaking changes are "usually" filtered out. Considering current understanding any claims that such things are impossible is foolish. Claiming they are unlikely because we have not seen them before is a better way of covering your ass.

      I do believe that this child most likely just has very good low light vision. I also have that misfortune, and blue eyes, somehow those two seem connected, at least from anecdotal evidence. I have been testing and apparently have somewhere between two to three times better than normal low light vision. Sun light, direct or overcast, is unbearable, even after prolonged exposure. This child's vision is probably similar and even better, if such a thing can be considered better.

    15. Re:What are the chances? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Nah, it was aliens, someone contact the Greek guy with flyaway hair on the H2 channel, he'll explain it all.

    16. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend, the pain does not stop until the sun goes away

      Or the eyesight. If that boy has trouble seeing in bright sunlight, why don't they give him sunglasses?

    17. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How many lx is "pitch-black"? In the video they just say that they hung up some blankets and that someone else couldn't see other people's faces. There was no mention of complete darkness. Many people believe they can't see e.g. in the woods at night, when they just don't bother to wait for accomodation because of a cultural fear of "the dark". I hate it when I go camping with people and they insist on using flashlights all the time. They're psychologically primed to be afraid, so they don't even try doing without artificial light. In fact a flashlight blinds you and you won't see anything outside its light cone. I don't have better night vision than average. I'm just used to using it.

    18. Re:What are the chances? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Bigger Better First Faster Older Longer

      And now, Pussier as well!

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    19. Re:What are the chances? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite the superlative girlfriend you have there...

    20. Re:What are the chances? by sjames · · Score: 1

      To develop a new trait from nothing, yes. However, a single mutation can prevent a gtreat many genes from being expressed. It stands to reason that an opposite mutation could, generations later, re-enable all of the necessary genes in a single event.

      However, I'd say it's more likely he just has really good night vision on the extreme end of the human norm rather than a novel (for humans) eye structure.

    21. Re:What are the chances? by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      That eye doctor seems like an educated imbicile.

      Nobody said the reflective layer was fully formed and functional, only that the boy can see in the dark like a cat.

      Moreover it's not out of the realm of possibility that a fully formed and functional organ could appear because of a single mutation. By causing a single mutation, the dormant tooth producing genes in chickens have been made to produce teeth for instance.

      It could be that a human ancestor had a fully formed reflective layer much like a cat's and that a single mutation activated the normally dormant genes in this boy.

      --
      ...
  5. old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG, this is older than numa numa guy meme.

  6. Not a mutation by sakdoctor · · Score: 3, Funny

    He had a surgical shine job.

    1. Re:Not a mutation by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      And had to kill a few people...

    2. Re:Not a mutation by crypticedge · · Score: 2

      Menthol Kools are cigarettes, a common currency in jail

    3. Re:Not a mutation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like your ASS!

  7. Night vision by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still have very good night vision, but as I age it's not as effective as it was when I was a teenager. I have above average visual acuity, which I think is the basis of it. Having blue eyes I can't see as being relevent or even reflecting eyes (hay, anyone ever hear of red eye?) His irises are simply able to dilate enough to let in more of the limited light available and has sensitive Rod cells.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Night vision by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      I was told that most animals can see better in the "dark" than we can because of a reflective lining inside their eyeball that augments available light.
      Not true?

    2. Re:Night vision by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Night vision by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Informative

      Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.

      And they often lack Cone cells, which provides more space for Rod cells. Nightvision is typically not in colour as the more sensitive of the two (Rods and Cones) are Rods.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:Night vision by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      I've always had great vision, including night vision. A recent trip to the eye doctor (first one in at least 20 years) confirmed that my vision still scores at 20/20 or better. I found this hard to believe because my vision is noticeably worse than it was five or ten years ago, which makes me wonder how the world looks to people who live their whole life with bad vision. Also, curiously, I have blue eyes and have suffered with red eyes in every picture ever taken of me. Three of my kids have blue eyes and likewise always show up in pictures with demon eyes; however, even a normal lighted environment occasionally produces a silvery reflection in their eyes.

    5. Re:Night vision by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      I'll have to second that.

      I've always had an uncanny ease to move about in near darkness but never thought much of it. A few years ago when I got my right eye corrected through laser surgery, the doctors couldn't believe how wide my pupils could open up; makes sense.

    6. Re:Night vision by IdolizingStewie · · Score: 2

      How does the world look to people with bad vision? Blurry, mostly. More specifically, though, the most obvious change for me when I got glasses for the first time was realizing that kids draw trees with one green blob at the top for simplicity's sake. I did it because that's what they looked like.

    7. Re:Night vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A recent trip to the eye doctor (first one in at least 20 years)

      Things can go wrong with eyes that don't affect vision right away (ie, you wouldn't notice anything wrong). Eye doctors aren't there just to correct poor vision. They're there to keep your eyes healthy. Do yourself a favor and get them checked every year.

  8. Old hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He doesn't even actually have blue eyes and this is an old story.

    1. Re:Old hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he has blue eyes! They're in a jar under his bed!

    2. Re:Old hoax by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can't find any references to this before January 2012, although maybe the recent news flare-up has drowned the older stuff out. Here's a Snopes thread on it, nobody's calling it a hoax and these guys know their hoaxes:

      http://message.snopes.com/showthread.php?t=78597

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Old hoax by Dahan · · Score: 2

      I can't find any references to this before January 2012, although maybe the recent news flare-up has drowned the older stuff out.

      Or maybe it's just now made it to the English-language media. Here's an documentary from 2008 in Chinese about the kid. It turns out his night vision is a bit better than normal, but it's not that much better. The doctor says he probably has a form of ocular albinism (which is known to cause both sensitivity to bright light, and slightly improved night vision).

    4. Re:Old hoax by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It's not necessarily a hoax but it is unproven. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and all we have now are some easily fakeable videos and the claims of only one Chinese doctor.

  9. evolution via virus by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    So many are missing is that evolution tends to jump like this. As such, the implication is not that radiation does it, but that life borrows from each other. We will find a number of virus in the future that are asymptomatic, but are carrying genes from one species to another.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:evolution via virus by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe his father had sex with a blue-eyed cat?

    2. Re:evolution via virus by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1
  10. Probability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is one probability P among all human races for such a thing to happen, then China would be a place where Math.floor(P * population) just became > 0

  11. ceiling cat/nyan cat by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

    There's got to be a ceiling cat / nyan cat joke in here somewhere.

    1. Re:ceiling cat/nyan cat by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 1

      Chinese ceiling boy watches you masturbate!

    2. Re:ceiling cat/nyan cat by blau · · Score: 1

      ...IN THE DARK!

  12. Don't bring him to any furry conventions by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 1

    or he'll be screwed.

    1. Re:Don't bring him to any furry conventions by spauldo · · Score: 1

      That's Thai furry conventions, not Chinese.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  13. The True measurement by isotope23 · · Score: 0

    Do creepers flee when he is near?

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  14. Nothing weird about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to anyone with blue eyes. People with lighter eye color tend to have more sensitive eyes. When in bright light without sunglasses, I tend to walk with my eyes closed, only looking out every couple of seconds to make sure I won't trip, and as I live in southeast Texas, that's pretty often.

    http://health.msn.com/health-topics/vision/eye-care-the-causes-of-light-sensitivity

    1. Re:Nothing weird about this... by THE_WELL_HUNG_OYSTER · · Score: 2

      There's this new technology called "sunglasses" that might help you.

  15. Can't capture on camera? by hawguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Despite the claims that his eyes have a retroreflective tapetum lucidum, they can't capture it on camera:

    http://www.lifeslittlemysteries.com/2115-china-cat-eyed-boy-night-vision.html

    In the footage, Nong's teacher claims the boy's eyes flash when shined with a flashlight in the dark, but the reporters don't seem to be able to catch the effect on camera. When Nong's eyes are illuminated in the dark, they appear normal. James Reynolds, a pediatric ophthalmologist at State University of New York in Buffalo, noted, "A video could capture [eyeshine] easily, just like in nature films of leopards at night."

    I can't seem to take a flash photo of my dog without seeing her eyes shine back at me, so I don't see why they can't capture the effect in this boy if it exists.

    I think he's just a blue-eyed chinese boy (which is unusual but not unheard of) with exceptionally good low-light vision, but I don't believe he's developed the same low-light vision adaptation that some animals have.

    1. Re:Can't capture on camera? by russotto · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, his eyes look like ordinary blue eyes to me. Seems to me his mother really pulled off a fast one on his father. "Ooh, it's a mutation, has nothing to do with my job as a tour guide for Western visitors."

    2. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reading this article the other day set off all sorts of alarm bells in my mind. When human eyes "shine" a color other than red, one should immediately suspect retinoblastoma. This is a rare form of cancer which only appears in children. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002025/ I hope it isn't and that he really is one of the first X-men, but the claims of this article are a bit too far fetched for me.

    3. Re:Can't capture on camera? by eggstasy · · Score: 2

      Blue is the "true" color of the eye. Anything else implies there is some pigment - such as melanin - being produced.
      He could have simply gotten a mutation that prevents the eye from secreting melanin, and indeed blue-eyed people are supposedly more sensitive to light. They do, after all, come from those cloudy northern european countries full of pale white people.

    4. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pink is the "true" color of skin. Anything else implies there is some pigment - such as melanin - being produced.

    5. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I had a biology professor who studied with someone who had a tapetum lucidum, which was great fun when they were working on a field survey in the desert at night -- the guy almost got shot as an aggressive coyote until he got close enough for the others to see his outline. Fortunately, the professor wasn't a trigger happy sort of person.

      Anecdotal reports in that class suggested that humans were selectively bred for lousy night vision; those whose eyes glowed in the dark were burned as witches or lynched as werewolves or whatever during the middle ages. Also, physics suggests that increasing light sensitivity by using a tapetum lucidum comes at a cost to resolving power and angular resolution.

    6. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue is the "true" color of the eye. Anything else implies there is some pigment - such as melanin - being produced.

      White is the "true" color of leaves. Anything else implies there is some pigment - such as chlorophyll - being produced.
      Black is the "true" color of the eye. Anything else implies there is a *deficiency* of melanin being produced.

      In biological terms, it's absurd to use statements such as the above. There is only the presence or absence of physical characteristics - be it color, hirsuteness or the ability to fly - there is no "true", just what's more common in a given time or location.

    7. Re:Can't capture on camera? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      I had a biology professor who studied with someone who had a tapetum lucidum, which was great fun when they were working on a field survey in the desert at night -- the guy almost got shot as an aggressive coyote until he got close enough for the others to see his outline. Fortunately, the professor wasn't a trigger happy sort of person.

      Anecdotal reports in that class suggested that humans were selectively bred for lousy night vision; those whose eyes glowed in the dark were burned as witches or lynched as werewolves or whatever during the middle ages. Also, physics suggests that increasing light sensitivity by using a tapetum lucidum comes at a cost to resolving power and angular resolution.

      I'd like to see a source for this -- having a human spontaneously develop a tapetum lucidum seems unlikely and details about any human who did so should be well documented since it would be such an unusual case.

      http://www.livescience.com/18209-china-cat-eyed-boy-night-vision.html

      Furthermore, there is no single genetic mutation that could produce a fully formed and functioning tapetum lucidum, Reynolds explained; such an ability would require multiple mutations, which don't just happen all at once. Evolution happens incrementally, he said, not by leaps and bounds. "Evolutionarily, mutations can result in differences that allow for new environmental niche exploitation. But such mutations are modified over long periods. A functional tapetum in a human would be just as absurd as a human born with wings. It can't happen,

    8. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I'll see if I can't find a bit more information about this guy from my professor.

      Also - pre-adaptation? It's entirely possible that there's a recessive mutation in a regulatory gene; some people lack the entire gene complex or a significant portion, and others have it intact, but deactivated.

      I figure once gene sequencing makes it mainstream, we may be able to elucidate this quickly and without drama. We may also be able to find drugs that reactivate a dormant night-vision complex, or supply the missing components.

    9. Re:Can't capture on camera? by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 2

      Shouldn't the true colour be red? As with, for example, albinos, people that don't produce melanin?

    10. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pink? Try death-white.

    11. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist.

    12. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Oligonicella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Anecdotal reports in that class suggested that humans were selectively bred for lousy night vision; those whose eyes glowed in the dark were burned as witches or lynched as werewolves or whatever during the middle ages."

      No. I'm a long-time studier of that period because of all it's lunacy and a I don't recall glowing eyes being a big deal or mentioned at all, anecdote or otherwise. It was religious beliefs coupled with economics that powered the purges.

      Add to that the Middle Ages was European, and one has to wonder why the rest of the world's population of eye-glowers has disappeared?

    13. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      one has to wonder why the rest of the world's population of eye-glowers has disappeared?

      Because no one wants to mate with what looks like an aggressive coyote when the lights go off?

    14. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, you are unfamiliar with furries.

    15. Re:Can't capture on camera? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Blue may be the true color, but not producing the pigment is a mutation. A normal non-mutant eye is brown. This mutation happened before, and the first guy with it was probably very successful with the ladies (after getting past the whole "it's a devil baby" phase, I assume). No reason it can't happen again.

      http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080130170343.htm

      At the same time, I call BS on most of the story. I've seen too many hoaxes fall apart after they hit the international news scene.

    16. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if we already have the gene set for a tapetum lucidum, and its expression has become almost completely suppressed (probably due to its not being needed, as we are not night hunters), but this boy had a set of mutations which REMOVED all the factors suppressing the extant gene structures. This would be a very rare event, but much more likely than a spontaneous recreation of all the genes needed from scratch (1st: the text of hamlet, interpolated with random text, and an army of monkeys with erasers. the 2nd, the usual gang of monkeys with ipads.)

    17. Re:Can't capture on camera? by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      I should have been more clear that was speculation on his part, I suppose.

  16. So is he color blind as well? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I know that cats aren't completely color blind, but they only have about a tenth the density of cones in their eye as a human with normal vision does, and to us, such imagery would look highly desaturated.

    1. Re:So is he color blind as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would expect it'd be more like a low-quality mjpg video: The grayscale/brightness part is sharp and well-defined, while the color is blurry and blocky, while being saturated enough. I'd expect that any lack of saturation would be compensated by the brain, at least as far as relative saturation is concerned.

    2. Re:So is he color blind as well? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know that cats aren't completely color blind, but they only have about a tenth the density of cones in their eye as a human with normal vision does, and to us, such imagery would look highly desaturated.

      Vision is as much what goes on in the various higher-level parts of the brain as the original physical response of the eye to the stimulus.

      Saying that something that cat "sees" would look desaturated "to us" is open to question because what the cat "sees" is determined by its brain, which we can assume is designed to work with the cats eyes and hence wouldn't "perceive" it as desaturated.

      But even ignoring this philosophical issue, I suspect that- could we wire a cats eye up to a human brain- the other AC reply to you was more plausible when it suggested that it would appear as poorer colour resolution "like a low-quality mjpg video", or a bog-standard VHS recording. Simply because that aspect *would* be dictated by the physicality of the eye- if you have fewer colour sensors, colour resolution is physically going to be worse. (*)

      But what we would have (I expect) would be fewer sensors, with each having a comparable colour response (i.e. each would still give off them same level of stimulus in response to the same colour, there would just be fewer such stimulus signals being sent to the brain).

      The "less saturation" idea only sounds plausible(!) if- during the cat's-eye-to-human transplant- one hardwired the human's unused optic nerve connections (left over from there being more colour sensors in the human eye than the cats') such that they were feeding back "no colour" signals. Then the overall saturation *might* be perceived as being reduced. However, (a) I doubt our hypothetical eye transplant would be done that way even if it were possible, (b) I doubt the human *brain* would respond that way to such rewiring anyway and (c) This wasn't really my point, which was to "compare" a cat's vision to ours, not to speculate about some weird, esoteric and unlikely transplant ;-)

      (*) Of course, the brain might "work around" the reduction and "cover it up" with interpolated and "filled" information like it does in everyday use, so that you don't notice it- though it might be possible to show it experimentally. (For example, like how we don't normally perceive our eyes' blind spots because the brain "Photoshops" it out at what I assume is a fairly low/early-level of processing... but we can still demonstrate to ourselves that it is there.

      tl; dr Version- Fewer colour sensors are more likely to lead to reduced colour resolution (as per AC) for purely physical reasons. But perception of "reduced saturation" is less likely and getting into that makes assumptions about vision that lead to philosophical issues of perception. (^_^)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  17. X-Men by wiedzmin · · Score: 4, Funny

    How is there no X-Men reference anywhere in the article or the comments? Are we afraid of copyright lawsuits for uttering the brand? :)

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
    1. Re:X-Men by drfishy · · Score: 1

      X-Men? Try Dune.

    2. Re:X-Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 4400 or Heroes. Evolution is upon us!

  18. has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by Karmashock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looking for some authentication here...

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re:has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is 100% verified bullcrap. The fact the voice-over SAYS his eyes glow like a cat's doesn't really cover up the fact the video shows they don't.
      How dose this stuff get on /.?

    2. Re:has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No bullcrap. Mom doesn't want to say to Dad she cheated on him.

    3. Re:has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by Smigh · · Score: 1

      ... with the cat!

    4. Re:has this been verified or is it bullcrap? by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      do they take pictures of his eyes in the dark? Because a cat's eye's don't so much glow as reflect light.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  19. Yeah but by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Does he know the lyrics?

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Yeah but by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      When I read he's got cat's eyes, I though of a different song.

  20. My brown eyed wife sees worse in the dark than me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brown eyed wife sees worse in the dark than me.

    And I have blue eyes.

    Two cases in a row, out of 7,000,000,000 people!

  21. Spice on Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Atreides overlords.

  22. Calling BS by toxonix · · Score: 1

    Scientifically not likely. A working tapetum lucidum doesn't just appear in a mutation. I think those are contacts anyhow.

  23. Pitch Black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jack: Where the hell can I get eyes like that?
    Riddick: Gotta kill a few people.
    Jack: 'Kay, I can do it.
    Riddick: Then you got to get sent to a slam, where they tell you you'll never see daylight again. You dig up a doctor, and you pay him 20 menthol Kools to do a surgical shine job on your eyeballs.
    Jack: So you can see who's sneaking up on you in the dark?
    Riddick: Exactly.

  24. Not night vision by chinton · · Score: 0

    But prescient vision. His eyes are actually blue-in-blue.

  25. Possible explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have red/green colour blindness, and I know I see better in low light than people with normal vision.

    According to New Scientist (sorry, can't find the reference), people with colour blindness have the same total number of light-collecting cells in their retina, as people with normal vision - but with a different mix of colour-sensitive cells versus light-shade sensitive cells. The light-sensitive operate down to much lower light levels ("at dusk, all cats are grey").. So the colour-blind person has more of the sensitive cells than a normal-sighted person, and sees better in the dark as a result.

    This guy is perhaps an example of an unusual retina - either more cells than usual, or at least more of the light-sensitive cells.

    1. Re:Possible explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's interesting -- I didn't know, but had just assumed the missing color photoreceptors (cones) were replaced by the other two "flavors" of cones, not by rods.

  26. A chinese boy with CAT-like night vision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Might I remind you of the phrase "You are what you eat!" It's no wonder a Chinese boy developed a cat-like ability!

  27. It's possible he just has rods, no cones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's possible he just has rods, no cones. Is he colorblind to all or most shades of color?

  28. I'm about halfway there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it happened because, when I was in gradeschool, my theoretical bedtime was 8pm, but I was allowed to read as long as I could do so by the light coming in the window. By the time I was in junior high, I could read by starlight during a new moon.

    The downside is, going outdoors in the daytime is physically uncomfortable, even on overcast days.

  29. Hey by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    The spice must flow, and all that.

  30. Within normal variation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lesser variant of this is not uncommon, or at least not unheard of - the light reflects inside the cornea, helping to amplify and gather light. In bright light, however, this can result in double vision to a greater or lesser extent, and also tends to cause headaches. (I assume that actual feline eyes work differently and/solve these problems)

    Speaking as one who has this, it means I wear sunglasses All The Time, I don't turn on lights indoors very often, and I've been pulled over three times so far for forgetting to turn on my headlights. It's not a superpower, it's just above-average night vision.

  31. Journalist didn't understand what the boys teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    said about him being his star pupil!

  32. Driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will soon be the best driver in all of Asia

    1. Re:Driver? by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      That's not really setting the bar very high.

      You could say that he could soon be the best driver in California, but again that's not all that high.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  33. I wonder... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    Did he pay a doctor 20 menthol cools to do a shine job on his eyeballs?

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  34. Next up: BAT Boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where is Weekly World News when you need it? They could easily confirm this.

  35. Geez... by komuso · · Score: 1

    I didn't thought pollution was THAT bad in China.

  36. Illegitimate Child by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Or this could be an illegitimate child that the mother refuse to say.....

  37. Re:selectively breeding for night vision by Dareth · · Score: 2

    What do you call people who have been, "selectively breeding for night vision for thousands of years"?

    Ninjas!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  38. Substantive proof by twoears · · Score: 2

    that you are what you eat.

  39. I guess this proves the old adage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are what you eat.

  40. Unregulated gene manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THe wife and I experiment with unregulated gene manipulation all the time, and we're not even in China!

    You're right, it's awesome.

  41. Blue-eyed sightseeing children. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure you can find those at any tourist destination. . . Disneyworld, The Smithsonian, Paris. . .

  42. redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the posts before making your own post. I said this 2 hours before you....

    Anonymous Coward

  43. misleading summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the boy is Persian.

  44. Well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he has opposable thumbs, so he can lift the toilet seat.

  45. Chinese Food.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are what you eat..... ...sorry, had to.

  46. I have a question by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    In the video they said that a teacher noticed that he had to squint in the sunlight when playing. Question: how do you tell when a chinese kid is squinting? Seriously though how do you tell? Some asians have eyes that look more or less closed all the time so how do you tell the difference between someone with normally mostly closed eyes and one that squinting in normal light because it is too bright for them? Wouldn't it be more of the case that you'd notice it when the kid was in a darker room that, "oh look his eyes can open up more"?

    1. Re:I have a question by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      Oh and my night vision is pretty good too. I usually work with machines with the light out and my coworkers are stumbling around. Mah, helps me see the lasers better than with the lights on and everything being bright. Also was very useful when sneaking up on people when I was in the army :-)

  47. I wonder... by renjipanicker · · Score: 1

    Will he haz cheezburgers?

  48. Maybe he's just got regular vision by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Have you ever seen a typical Chinese person drive?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  49. Mako by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't be the only person thinking about FF7 right now, right?

  50. Look, look at me with your special eyes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapetum_lucidum

    i guess it's possible to have randomly mutated one of these out of his genetic code. if he survives and mates with others like him and can outcompete the rest of us, it could become the new norm. :)