I do think they jumped the gun a bit by getting their background correction from a scraped conference figure rather than unambiguous published data, which seems to be the source of the problem.
It's not either-or. Google already restricts videos to particular delivery or monetisation methods according to its licencing agreements; there is no reason why it cannot do exactly the same thing with its new subscription service.
On the gripping hand, Google's new streaming service isn't a video delivery system, it's for audio content, so the new licencing rules needn't apply to people's existing videos at all.
Honestly, they didn't plan to replace it, at least not on any appreciable timescale. People don't buy TVs like they buy games consoles or phones or iPods, so the sensible thing at the time was to roll out yet another twenty-year standard and get around to thinking about succession later. Of course, if you're a Sony or a Samsung looking at your briefly revitalised TV business tailing off again as people finish upgrading, maybe you're regretting this.
...or I've read the stories about this from the past few weeks indicating how this affects a number of coalitions of independent musicians with or without label representation, and therefore know fine well that it's not just affecting three artists.
But, y'know, assume I'm a jerk. That's a great policy. It's not like you can literally see everything I've ever posted on Slashdot and figure it out.
Did reading comprehension drop when I was away? The headline is "YouTube to block indie labels as subscription service launches" and all of the comments regarding terms are about Google's upcoming streaming service. The videos in question are already on YouTube so there's no "independent labels" refusing permission for them to be up there.
The Guardian article is pretty unambiguous about it too.
I couldn't find a phrasing that fit and carried the intended meaning, and I assumed that people who read the summary would grasp that it referred to the thing Google have that music videos might actually be on.
When they come up with a version of wifi that works over the dozens of miles that currently exist between me and my nearest tower, sure. But I suspect it would either look like a giant power plant attached to an enormous antenna, or just be a reinvention of the current cellular standards.
The isotope ratio is more different than you'd expect for formation without an impact by a third body, but it's less different than you'd expect from an impact given what we know about the distributions of oxygen isotopes in the solar system. So both hypotheses need revision: for the Theia hypothesis, they suppose that it was an inner planet with a remarkably similar composition to Earth, and for the non-impact hypothesis, they suppose that the Earth's isotope ratio diverged from that of the moon due to later (small) impacts delivering different compositions.
The price of an iPad Air would probably pay for a couple of years of 4G hotspot access and a USB battery pack for the hotspot - or an entire extra hotspot, for that matter.
Slashdot Mirror
I do think they jumped the gun a bit by getting their background correction from a scraped conference figure rather than unambiguous published data, which seems to be the source of the problem.
Doesn't the Alcubierre drive have the same causality issues as any other FTL form of propulsion?
By "standard theory" to you mean the standard model of particle physics? If so:
1) That's a different thing
2) It's probably the most correct model of anything ever invented
Everyone wants faster, cheaper, and lighter cars, but you cannae break the laws o' physics, captain.
Gifted is more specific; one may be given something that is not a gift. May I suggest a word-of-the-day calendar?
It's not either-or. Google already restricts videos to particular delivery or monetisation methods according to its licencing agreements; there is no reason why it cannot do exactly the same thing with its new subscription service.
On the gripping hand, Google's new streaming service isn't a video delivery system, it's for audio content, so the new licencing rules needn't apply to people's existing videos at all.
Yeah, that was a bad oversight.
Honestly, they didn't plan to replace it, at least not on any appreciable timescale. People don't buy TVs like they buy games consoles or phones or iPods, so the sensible thing at the time was to roll out yet another twenty-year standard and get around to thinking about succession later. Of course, if you're a Sony or a Samsung looking at your briefly revitalised TV business tailing off again as people finish upgrading, maybe you're regretting this.
...or I've read the stories about this from the past few weeks indicating how this affects a number of coalitions of independent musicians with or without label representation, and therefore know fine well that it's not just affecting three artists.
But, y'know, assume I'm a jerk. That's a great policy. It's not like you can literally see everything I've ever posted on Slashdot and figure it out.
Did reading comprehension drop when I was away? The headline is "YouTube to block indie labels as subscription service launches" and all of the comments regarding terms are about Google's upcoming streaming service. The videos in question are already on YouTube so there's no "independent labels" refusing permission for them to be up there.
The Guardian article is pretty unambiguous about it too.
I couldn't find a phrasing that fit and carried the intended meaning, and I assumed that people who read the summary would grasp that it referred to the thing Google have that music videos might actually be on.
When they come up with a version of wifi that works over the dozens of miles that currently exist between me and my nearest tower, sure. But I suspect it would either look like a giant power plant attached to an enormous antenna, or just be a reinvention of the current cellular standards.
More to the point, whenever we've been given the chance, we haven't.
That's like asking, "how do we know that the Cretaceous period was called the Cretaceous period, the dinosaurs didn't have written language".
The isotope ratio is more different than you'd expect for formation without an impact by a third body, but it's less different than you'd expect from an impact given what we know about the distributions of oxygen isotopes in the solar system. So both hypotheses need revision: for the Theia hypothesis, they suppose that it was an inner planet with a remarkably similar composition to Earth, and for the non-impact hypothesis, they suppose that the Earth's isotope ratio diverged from that of the moon due to later (small) impacts delivering different compositions.
Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker is the best Metal Gear game since 2005's MGS3. It's also excellently suited to handheld gaming.
You'd have to be pretty gullible to believe it was humans that were responsible and not the Nordics.
None of the US variants of the 5S supports UK 4G.
https://www.apple.com/iphone/L...
The fine summary.
If she's looking at spending £25 or more on a service plan, she can probably get a Nexus 5 for free (or next to free).
The price of an iPad Air would probably pay for a couple of years of 4G hotspot access and a USB battery pack for the hotspot - or an entire extra hotspot, for that matter.
Especially given that (presumably) she's buying it off-contract. It's that or a pile of roaming fees.
That phone comes in different versions for 4G AT&T, EMEA, and Asian frequency bands, so it's definitely not US-and-Europe suitable.
Would've been nice if I'd kept the spelling of straight straight. Sweet deus.
On the gripping hand, 4G is so patchy in the UK, and high-speed 3G so prevalent, she probably won't really want a 4G handset anyway.