Why treat "the UI" as seperate? The human-computer interface is as much a part of the OS as anything else. To be frank, if I can't talk to the computer efficiently, it doesn't matter how well the software and hardware can talk between each other.
Doesn't that show that adopting aspects of the private healthcare model - in this case by making NHS regions competing, pseudo-autonomous units - is a bad idea?
Given that mosquitos drink whole blood, and not just red blood cells, you'd expect to find DNA-carrying cells in with any red blood cells. Of course it's moot because the traces they found were not cells.
I think you're giving Truthers a bit too much credit when you compare their models of the world to Looney Tunes cartoons. Looney Tunes physics were at least consistent.
It's a popular idea in SF. The "Earth-like Mars" part, at least, not sure about the bureaucracy part. I'm playing through a lovely iPhone game called Waking Mars right now which has its own take.
Of course we "confirm" things in science, we just don't use the word to mean that something is unambiguously stated to be true. When we use that word (and it's used ubiquitously) we mean that we're providing new evidence for a previously-accepted hypothesis.
The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one*, but the chances of anything coming from another solar system are mind-crushingly miniscule.
You'd want it to be a bluetooth receiver that understood bluetooth audio, interpreted it, and then in turn emulated an ordinary USB stereo headset where it connects to the PS4.
Inasmuch as it implicitly limits those terms' scope to the informational parts of the web site, and not its functional as a healthcare data repository, yes, it is reassuring.
Under his programming it was the most truthful response available:
The First Law of Polticians: A politician must obey the will of the the agencies under his oversight. The Second Law: A politician must obey the will of his lobbyists, except where this conflicts with the first law. The Third Law: A politican must obey the will of the people he represents, except where this conflicts with the first and second laws.
Believe it or not there are shades of grey between "completely unfettered use of the connection" and "I am ter conumar", and properly discussing this issue would probably benefit from understanding the kinds of distinctions involved.
The US government doesn't have any special obligations with regards to not stabbing every non-American in the world with a pencil, but that doesn't mean that it's acceptable for them to do so.
Shh. The US isn't allowed to perform assassinations. International law forbids it. They're surgical strikes against groups of combatants that just happen to include a specific figure of military or political significance.
They're not snooping on one, specific service at a point in the US. They're looking at any appropriate traffic that happens to pass through the US. Any information that passes through the US must be considered compromised by the NSA.
Tyson agrees that it's a great movie. His tweets aren't a manifesto against it: he does that nitpicking with practically every movie he sees. I'm sure I saw him tweet about incorrect constellations in the background of a Rom-Com once.
Slashdot Mirror
Why treat "the UI" as seperate? The human-computer interface is as much a part of the OS as anything else. To be frank, if I can't talk to the computer efficiently, it doesn't matter how well the software and hardware can talk between each other.
Doesn't that show that adopting aspects of the private healthcare model - in this case by making NHS regions competing, pseudo-autonomous units - is a bad idea?
Given that mosquitos drink whole blood, and not just red blood cells, you'd expect to find DNA-carrying cells in with any red blood cells. Of course it's moot because the traces they found were not cells.
I think you're giving Truthers a bit too much credit when you compare their models of the world to Looney Tunes cartoons. Looney Tunes physics were at least consistent.
For the amount the US spends on medical care I'd expect hospitals to look like the sickbay from Star Trek.
Maybe we should bill them.
Given the research demonstrating that people make better decisions when they need to go to the bathroom, maybe we should reconsider that.
It's a popular idea in SF. The "Earth-like Mars" part, at least, not sure about the bureaucracy part. I'm playing through a lovely iPhone game called Waking Mars right now which has its own take.
Of course we "confirm" things in science, we just don't use the word to mean that something is unambiguously stated to be true. When we use that word (and it's used ubiquitously) we mean that we're providing new evidence for a previously-accepted hypothesis.
The chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one*, but the chances of anything coming from another solar system are mind-crushingly miniscule.
*see Wayne et al
You'd want it to be a bluetooth receiver that understood bluetooth audio, interpreted it, and then in turn emulated an ordinary USB stereo headset where it connects to the PS4.
Inasmuch as it implicitly limits those terms' scope to the informational parts of the web site, and not its functional as a healthcare data repository, yes, it is reassuring.
Under his programming it was the most truthful response available:
The First Law of Polticians: A politician must obey the will of the the agencies under his oversight.
The Second Law: A politician must obey the will of his lobbyists, except where this conflicts with the first law.
The Third Law: A politican must obey the will of the people he represents, except where this conflicts with the first and second laws.
Believe it or not there are shades of grey between "completely unfettered use of the connection" and "I am ter conumar", and properly discussing this issue would probably benefit from understanding the kinds of distinctions involved.
If recent revelations are any indication, it's not like the people who didn't have lobbyists had much choice in the matter either.
The US government doesn't have any special obligations with regards to not stabbing every non-American in the world with a pencil, but that doesn't mean that it's acceptable for them to do so.
Email and chat protocols, per the article.
Yeah, I can't brain today.
That's what America needs. More reasons to sit still.
Why would that help when they're intercepting the email traffic itself?
Who said anything about cloud services?
Shh. The US isn't allowed to perform assassinations. International law forbids it. They're surgical strikes against groups of combatants that just happen to include a specific figure of military or political significance.
They're not snooping on one, specific service at a point in the US. They're looking at any appropriate traffic that happens to pass through the US. Any information that passes through the US must be considered compromised by the NSA.
Tyson agrees that it's a great movie. His tweets aren't a manifesto against it: he does that nitpicking with practically every movie he sees. I'm sure I saw him tweet about incorrect constellations in the background of a Rom-Com once.
Four hours of footage. I don't think there's many scenes in space that weren't shot in freefall.