Slashdot Mirror


Govt To Bomb Guam With Frozen Mice To Kill Snakes

rhettb writes "In a spectacularly creative effort to rid Guam of the brown tree snake, an invasive species which has ravaged local wildlife and angered local residents, the US Department of Agriculture is planning to 'bomb' the island's rainforests with dead frozen mice laced with acetaminophen. While it might not seem difficult to purge an island of snakes, the snake's habit of dwelling high in the rainforest canopy has so far thwarted efforts to rid the island of the pest. Eradicating the snake is a priority because it triggers more than 100 power outages a year at a cost of $1-4 million and has driven at least 6 local bird species to extinction."

229 comments

  1. I guess they'll die by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

    They dropped the gorillas to stomp the lions, the dropped the lions to hunt the dogs, the dropped the dogs to chase the cats, they dropped the cats to catch the mice, the dropped the mice to kill the snakes, but I don't know why they swallowed that fly.

    1. Re:I guess they'll die by malloc · · Score: 1

      You are awesome. :)

      --
      ___________________ I want to be free()!
    2. Re:I guess they'll die by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I knew I could count on someone to deliver the parent post. Exactly what I came here for. Thanks.

    3. Re:I guess they'll die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think frozen mice will be breeding anytime soon. Coming back as zombies maybe...

    4. Re:I guess they'll die by thijsh · · Score: 0

      They accidentally the mice.

    5. Re:I guess they'll die by northernfrights · · Score: 1

      Haha, cute, but the mice are dead, and the classic scenario will not apply...

    6. Re:I guess they'll die by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Haha, cute, but the mice are dead, and the classic scenario will not apply...

      and what about the (black) plague fleas, Mr. Smartypants?

    7. Re:I guess they'll die by somersault · · Score: 1

      That's what the genetically modified spiders are for!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:I guess they'll die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome.

    9. Re:I guess they'll die by Beorytis · · Score: 3, Funny

      They dropped the gorillas

      I guess winter isn't cold enough in Guam, otherwise the Gorillas would simply freeze to death.

    10. Re:I guess they'll die by Tuidjy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, this is actually a damn smart way to go about it. The mice are dead, and the poison destroys the target's liver, while being metabolized into an almost harmless compound, so that whatever eventually eats the snake is less likely to be poisoned in turn.

      Of course, that does not mean that something isn't going to go wrong, but seriously, where would we be, as a race, if we never took risks? At least it looks someone actually thought about this for a second, as opposed to the NYC opossum debacle.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    11. Re:I guess they'll die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, verb?

    12. Re:I guess they'll die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only word you're missing is 4chan.

    13. Re:I guess they'll die by Xacid · · Score: 1

      But the cheese stands alone.

    14. Re:I guess they'll die by northernfrights · · Score: 1

      What about them? My Smartypants are flea proof.

    15. Re:I guess they'll die by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

      dumb internet meme

  2. Don't you have to be a saint to do that? by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Funny

    While it might not seem difficult to purge an island of snakes

    For a saint...

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Don't you have to be a saint to do that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought all Guam "where America's Day Begins" really had to do was eliminate welfare/unemployment payments for a year and place a couple dollars, or so, bounty on each snake head brought in.

      Just like the Passanger Pigeon, and everything else worth killing for money or eats, they'd extinct those critters real quick.

    2. Re:Don't you have to be a saint to do that? by xenapan · · Score: 0

      Look out behind you! a three headed snake!

      --
      insert funny sig here
    3. Re:Don't you have to be a saint to do that? by NikolaiKutuzov · · Score: 1

      For a saint...

      or for Samuel L Jackson!

      Now THAT would be a biopic of St. patrick even I as an atheist would want to see!

      --
      Invita Invidia
  3. And if you happen to be on Guam by Megahard · · Score: 5, Funny

    And have a headache, just grab the nearest dead frozen mouse.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:And if you happen to be on Guam by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Since they're stuffed with acetaminophen / paracetamol / Tylenol (whatever you like to call it) that just might work.

      Then again, it might not.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:And if you happen to be on Guam by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Since they're stuffed with acetaminophen / paracetamol / Tylenol (whatever you like to call it)

      I prefer APAP, just because it sounds dirty

  4. Acetaminophen by pem · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess all those warnings about how Tylenol can damage your liver are true!

    1. Re:Acetaminophen by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Troll

      Nevermind about liver damage. Tylenol is rediculously easy to overdose on. That is probably what this tactic is based on.

      Tylenol is bad news. Probably shouldn't even be on the market.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Acetaminophen by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess all those warnings about how Tylenol can damage your liver are true!

      But this will only work if the snakes were drinking the night before!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Acetaminophen by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're right about the dangers of tylenol, it's bad especially combined with any other drug/chemical that strains your liver.

      However, it's the only painkiller known safe for pregnant women. All the rest of 'em? Not so good!

      --PM

    4. Re:Acetaminophen by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the primary effect from an overdose is liver damage.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Acetaminophen by schnikies79 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It takes >4 grams/day to overdose. It's far from "ridiculously easy". You can have 8 extra-strength Tylenol in a day and still be okay. /pharmicist

      --
      Gone!
    6. Re:Acetaminophen by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess all those warnings about how Tylenol can damage your liver are true!

      Ha Ha only serious. I can't find many decent references in a quick Google search, because all the links are "lolz teh armey is dropping Tylenol mice", but Acetaminophen is quite toxic to many animals, including house cats. It works as a poison by damaging the liver.

      For a healthy human, the liver can metabolize a normal dose of Tylenol just fine... but if you combine alcohol, Tylenol, and a drawerful of other Acetaminophen-containing products (cough syrup with pain reliever, sleep aid with pain reliever, cocaine/speed/etc cut with pain reliever, etc), you've got trouble on your hands.

      Also, there's the problem of would-be suicides who try to overdose on Tylenol-3, the prescription high-dose version with Codeine added. They generally don't die -- largely because there's a specific antidote that hospitals have to neutralize the Acetaminophen before it overwhelms the liver. Those who are too late for that intervention don't die either, not right away... they end up on the list for a donor liver, and get to spend their final weeks wishing that they'd either found a better way to get attention, or that they'd invested in a shotgun.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:Acetaminophen by erroneus · · Score: 1

      true that. if you need more, you need something stronger than tylenol.

    8. Re:Acetaminophen by JonySuede · · Score: 5, Informative

      if you drink more 3 drinks a day, the overdose threshold can be as high as 6grams

      since contrary to the popular belief, alcohol is actually protective in case of acetaminophen poisoning, since the P450 enzyme favour ethanol to acetaminophen so there is less N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine(the bad metabolite of Tylenol that fuck up your liver) produced, you can read more int he Merck manual

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    9. Re:Acetaminophen by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      A recent well-publicized study re-pegged that dangerous number (for liver damage to be likely) at ~2g.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    10. Re:Acetaminophen by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Cannabis is an effective and non-toxic analgesic. Every medicine cabinet should have some cannabis extract for general aches and pains, insomnia, stomach upset, and many other mild ailments.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Acetaminophen by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I guess if you follow the TV sitcom dose measurement convention of "just take a handful or two."

      If you're able to read, do read the bottle, follow instructions and can tell time, you should be just fine. Tylenol was the standard over the counter painkiller when I was a kid and everybody managed to avoid the "ridiculously easy" overdose.

      Even the kid who tried to overdose on purpose in high school didn't actually manage to do herself too much damage. A few years after graduation she did manage to find something stronger that would do the job properly.

    12. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many other mild ailments.

      Like Mondayssuckititis?

    13. Re:Acetaminophen by Sir_Dill · · Score: 1

      many other mild ailments.

      Like Mondays?

      There....Fixed that for you.

    14. Re:Acetaminophen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      It takes >4 grams/day to overdose. It's far from "ridiculously easy". You can have 8 extra-strength Tylenol in a day and still be okay. /pharmicist

      Nonetheless major stupid trumps 'easy' most of the time. Acetaminophen overdose (both accidental and intentional) is one of the most common causes of liver failure in the US. (Ethanol for the win).((Ethanol + acetaminophen for bonus points in the Darwin awards)).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:Acetaminophen by delinear · · Score: 1

      It's ideal for chill-blains.

    16. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cannabis is an effective and non-toxic analgesic. Every medicine cabinet should have some cannabis extract for general aches and pains, insomnia, stomach upset, and many other mild ailments.

      Many other mild ailments.. uh huh, like boredom? Never mind that it's habit forming as hell. ;) (And also never mind that the GP specifically mentions safety during pregnancy... lol).

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    17. Re:Acetaminophen by arielCo · · Score: 1

      Yes, because what kills a snake must kill a human too.

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    18. Re:Acetaminophen by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Plus one must remember that the average US citizen no longer weighs 70kg... so actually > 4g.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    19. Re:Acetaminophen by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > It takes >4 grams/day to overdose. It's far from "ridiculously easy". You can have 8 extra-strength Tylenol in a day and still be okay. /pharmicist

      You keep on telling yourself that. Sooner or later you will be seeing my friend the ER doctor.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:Acetaminophen by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The insistence that some people have on perpetrating harmful bogus nonsense simply boggles the mind.

      Little wonder that people offering enlightenment usually end up strung up...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    21. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A real pharmacist would be able to spell the word pharmacist.

      A real pharmacist would know that taking Acetaminophen over an extended period (longer than a week), can cause liver damage possibly leading to failure.

    22. Re:Acetaminophen by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There are "tylenol fanboys" with mod points. Who knew?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:Acetaminophen by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not physically addictive at all, and no more habit-forming than anything else that's fun.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    24. Re:Acetaminophen by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I got a receipt for Alvedon Forte 1 gram, got 100 of them, normal Alvedon is everything between 60 and 500 (though I assume more or less everyone buy 500 mg since that's the strongest you can buy without receipt.)

      Anyway, fass.se says not more than 4 / day.

      Don't know how exactly I was on dosing. Every 4-6 hours open up for more than 4 I guess ..

      I'd still say really easy to go over 4 gram if that's only 4 tablets. I doubt I was like "omg teh danger!"

      Also understood cats shouldn't eat them. (And my cat has had multiple epileptic-like seizures which may have come from her eating my SSRIs/Cipralex/Esertia.)

    25. Re:Acetaminophen by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Single dose =/= maximum daily dose. Don't mix and match study types.

      Acetaminophen metabolism follows first order kinetics and has a half life of 4-6 hours, depending on how healthy your liver is and how efficient your enzymes are. Taking one single 2.5g dose is probably enough to saturate your enzymes to the point that some damage will be done. However taking 4g divided in 4 doses of 1g every 6 hours will never get you over 2g total blood concentration since your body will be eliminating the drug.

      Of course there's an entire other argument about chronic acetaminophen use depleting glutathione/methionine stores over time, but that's an even different story.

      And then there's the other argument about chronic alcohol use, people who already have low glutathione stores and induced CYP2E1 cytochromes ready to zap that acetaminphen into NAPQI the minute it enters the liver - but why bore you with pharmacology when you can get your own doctorate?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    26. Re:Acetaminophen by Anomalyx · · Score: 1

      I can eat nothing but chips and soda and still be okay too. It all depends on the time frame for which you are okay. You might be okay now, but taking acetaminophen consistently will undoubtedly shorten your lifespan. Of course a pharmacist will say it's okay, for two reasons. One is that handing out drugs is their job, and the second is that they were told by some professor or some "study" that it was ok (I use quotes because everyone knows how whacked pharmaceutical studies can be).

      My wife has taken an average of 500mg of acetaminophen (1 dose of 2x Excedrin) daily for the past 12 years. That's far from 8 extra-strength Tylenol daily, but now she avoids it like the plague. It causes intense stomach pain and makes her liver swell noticeably every time she takes it now. The same is true of her brother, although he's probably closer to having taken it for 6 years, not 12. I avoid it unless I have an incapacitating headache. I've taken it maybe 10 times in my life, and I'd like to keep it that way. Besides, we've found that drinking cherry juice (tart cherries, and not that concentrate/artificial/flavored crap, get 100% natural juice) works just fine for most headaches.

      --
      No, there is no "-1 I'LL NEVER ADMIT BEING WRONG!!!" mod.
    27. Re:Acetaminophen by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, what's the harmful bogus nonsense?

      I'd think you were agreeing with me, that characterizing Tylenol as "ridiculously easy to overdose on" is bogus nonsense, but you're the one who originally posted it!

    28. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not physically addictive at all, and no more habit-forming than anything else that's fun.

      Bullshit. This is a classic line espoused by chronic marijuana users. The fact is that when you quit, most people experience anxiety, extreme agitation, loss of appetite, and even nightmares for several days afterwards.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    29. Re:Acetaminophen by adavies42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get that when I turn off the air conditioner. Does that make cold air addictive?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    30. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Never mind that it's habit forming as hell.

      Um... this is bullshit. Chocolate, caffeine... now these are particularly known to cause extreme physical and psychological dependency in nearly all humans. Cannabis? Not really, not so much. Depends on the person, as most things are habit-forming to the addictive personality, So, yes, nevermind this often repeated yet nonetheless incorrect information. Instead, we can theorize that there would be no United States today if not for the colonial cannabis crop. Or we can talk about how George Washington was rather preoccupied by his personal crop. Or we can stay on point and discuss how one of the most useful medicines of all time has been systematically demonized by racists, unscrupulous newspaper barons and the likes of Joe McCarty. Let's get the truth out there, and leave the fear behind.

    31. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you.. you made a crazy claim and you realized everyone would call bullshit.. so you included a source... thank you for the source. I wish more people here would include a source.

    32. Re:Acetaminophen by pizzach · · Score: 1

      I've always had qualms about the attention argument. If they wanted attention, they would hold a bank up with hostages and get someone *else* to shoot them on TV or something. Attempted death by Tylenol strikes me more as poor judgment than 'attention getting.'

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    33. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO. No they don't.

    34. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 3, Informative

      The withdrawal from marijuana is nothing at all compared to the withdrawal from coffee, or even television. What you incorrectly believe was actually entirely made up by racists in the 1920s, and perpetuated by McCarthyists. To say cannabis incurs no withdrawal whatsoever would be more correct than exaggerating the extremely minor, usually unnoticed, symptoms.

      Even Federal Judges at the DEA, reviewing the testimony of experts, have deemed that it is relativey harmless, and ruled it should be legal.

    35. Re:Acetaminophen by Redlazer · · Score: 1

      There is also no proof that is damaging, or bad for you, or bad for your child. It was previously given during a difficult childbirth in the Days of Yore.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    36. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1

      The withdrawal from marijuana is nothing at all compared to the withdrawal from coffee, or even television.

      You get short-tempered and agitated from turning off the TV? Holy shit. Kill your tv now, man.

      What you incorrectly believe was actually entirely made up by racists in the 1920s, and perpetuated by McCarthyists.

      Huh? What I incorrectly believe was drawn from smoking my share (and your share, and his share, and her share, and that guy's share.) You want to say it isn't habit forming, fine. Go smoke a blunt and talk about it some more.

      To say cannabis incurs no withdrawal whatsoever would be more correct than exaggerating the extremely minor, usually unnoticed, symptoms.

      Interesting, now we're admitting that there are physical symptoms of withdrawal. Even though you don't notice them doesn't mean that everyone around you doesn't notice them as well. Ask your girlfriend what you're like when you don't have anything to smoke.

      Even Federal Judges at the DEA, reviewing the testimony of experts, have deemed that it is relativey harmless, and ruled it should be legal.

      Did I say it shouldn't be legal? No. It's far more harmless and much safer than alcohol, and THAT is legal. I never said it shouldn't be legalized.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    37. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.. quite the informative post.

    38. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 0, Troll

      ah, ad hominem, I know thee well.

      I can do it, too... check this out: You are quite obviously of extremely low intelligence.

    39. Re:Acetaminophen by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trust me, I've seen it. You're thinking of attention like "famous person" attention, or something you'd see in a movie. Mundane, everyday clinical depression doesn't work that way -- the need for attention is a subconscious thing, not a purposeful attempt.

      Someone who's depressed doesn't say "Oh, I need attention, I'll do something stupid today". It's more like the childhood verse: "Nobody loves me, everybody hates me, I'm going to eat a worm."

      That's why OD'ing on Tylenol is a case of "Suicide in haste, repent at leisure". If it's too late for the antidote, you get plenty of time to realize what a dumb thing you did as you wait for a transplant (in a hospital under psych watch).

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    40. Re:Acetaminophen by AhabTheArab · · Score: 1

      Cannabis is an effective and non-toxic analgesic. Every medicine cabinet should have some cannabis extract for general aches and pains, insomnia, stomach upset, and many other mild ailments.

      Many other mild ailments.. uh huh, like boredom? Never mind that it's habit forming as hell. ;) (And also never mind that the GP specifically mentions safety during pregnancy... lol).

      Are you implying it's unsafe to use during pregnancy? Cannabis has been used for thousands of years, often as the sole analgesic given to the mother during childbirth. And guess what? It doesn't cause harm to the mother or fetus/baby. Don't take my word for it though - check out this study:

      A total of 2964 infants was studied. At birth, 44% of the infants tested positive for drugs: 30.5% positive for cocaine, 20.2% for opiate, and 11.4% for cannabinoids. Compared to the drug negative group, a significantly higher percentage (P less than .05) of the drug positive infants had lower weight and smaller head circumference and length at birth and a higher percent of their mothers were single, multigravid, multiparous, and had little to no prenatal care. Within the first 2 years of life, 44 infants died: 26 were drug negative (15.7 deaths per 1000 live births) and 18 were drug positive (13.7 deaths per 1000 live births). The mortality rate among cocaine, opiate, or cannabinoid positive infants were 17.7, 18.4, and 8.9 per 1000 live births, respectively.

      I realize that ONE study doesn't mean a whole lot, but those are pretty impressive results. Certainly something that needs to be looked into more. As for me - I use cannabis for everything from a headache to PTSD. Why? Because it WORKS. APAP, Ibuprofin, and other NSAID's have never been able to curb my headaches. I'm not certain about all NSAIDs, but I know APAP has been shown to cause liver damage. Why would I choose to use something that doesn't work and causes liver damage, when I can use a safe, effective medicine? As for the irritability, anxiety, nightmares, poor appetite, etc you talk about in another post - yes, I do experience those symptoms when I cease cannabis use. However, those are symptoms of PTSD rather than "withdrawal" symptoms.

    41. Re:Acetaminophen by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      The fact is that when you quit, most people experience anxiety, extreme agitation, loss of appetite, and even nightmares for several days afterwards.

      ROFL, no they don't. Where'd you get that absurd idea? From your local DARE chapter?

    42. Re:Acetaminophen by mfluder47 · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, acetaminophen overdoses often aren't from people taking extra-strength tylenol to excess. Addicts take massive doses of codeine derivatives (Lortab, Vicodin) that also include large doses of acetaminophen. Not that it has anything to do with snakes...

    43. Re:Acetaminophen by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I take it back. There's definitely evidence that truly chronic users (like, regular, daily users) experience some amount of withdrawl after cessation. 'course, when you start to think about it, that makes sense, as you're no longer taking a sleep aid or an appetite stimulant, and so your body reacts accordingly, with insomnia and appetite loss.

    44. Re:Acetaminophen by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Who is most people? I've been off and on a heavy pot user for 15 years now, and have never experienced any withdrawal effects at all. My usual m.o. is to get a big bag, smoke it over a period of a month or so, and when it's gone, *shrug*, I'm bored with it by then and I'll probably get another in a few months. Literally every one of my friends who smokes is the same way, in fact the usual impetus for getting more is someone going, "hey, when's the last time we smoked some weed?"

      And no, I'm not failing to notice the symptoms. I've had physical dependencies on nicotine, caffeine, cocaine, and vicodin, and I know all too well what a physical dependency feels like. Vicodin? Got a too-long prescription from my doctor, and that was the most physically painful withdrawal I've ever had. Don't recommend it. Coke? Much like cigarettes in that there's little physical pain but a lot of brain twisting that makes you convince yourself to go get more. Caffeine? Easy to slowly ramp down, but if you don't holy shit that's a headache. Nicotine? Still trying to quit that. Such a subtle little rat in your head that whispers to go get more until you think it's your own thought, and if you reject it, it'll scratch and claw in death throes at the inside of your skull as you get hit with a craving where you feel the rest of your life go by without a fix. Now that's an addiction.

      But pot? No, I can empirically say that pot is not addictive. If you have an issue quitting pot you have other psychological problems that would have manifested in other ways and if nothing else was available the kind of person who gets "addicted" to pot would get just as addicted to hitting themselves in the head with a rock.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    45. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    46. Re:Acetaminophen by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      The fact is that when you quit, most people experience anxiety, extreme agitation, loss of appetite, and even nightmares for several days afterwards.

      [Citation Needed]

      When someone starts a sentence with "The fact is", it's almost always not a fact.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    47. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 0, Troll

      My personal experience is that when you quit, most people experience anxiety, extreme agitation, loss of appetite, and even nightmares for several days afterwards.

      [Citation Needed]

      When someone starts a sentence with "The fact is", it's almost always not a fact.

      Sorry, fixed that for you.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    48. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, this is a very interesting and insightful post that adds to the conversation. I can identify with just about everything in that post except for the cocaine. The only thing I can recommend about quitting nicotine is "Keep trying". It takes practice to quit smoking cigarettes. and as for the pot addiction, I certainly didn't mean it in the same was as opiate addiction. However, I do believe that all too many pot heads wander around arguing that it isn't addictive while simultaneously smoking an 1/8 a week and watching their whole lives slip past. Yes, there are real withdrawals that happen from smoking weed, no they won't give you kicks or cold sweats, but they make life not as good for a while after you quit. the OP's assertion was that weed has "No" physical addictive qualities, and only the same psychological addictive qualities as "anything else that is fun." I believe that this is patently untrue.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    49. Re:Acetaminophen by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      What you're saying is that humans can feel strong withdrawal symptoms from anything they might get addicted to, even when it's not a chemical addiction. But, by some miracle, weed happens to be free of all that.

    50. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the +0 Strange mod?

    51. Re:Acetaminophen by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Such a subtle little rat in your head that whispers to go get more until you think it's your own thought, and if you reject it, it'll scratch and claw in death throes at the inside of your skull as you get hit with a craving where you feel the rest of your life go by without a fix.

      Try attaching the craving thought (or feeling or whatever) to a negative thought through a chain, like first imagine what will happen if you do smoke another one: the good feeling, the clear mind, the relaxed impulse. Then imagine finishing the cig, and the chemical effects are starting to wear off, and there is a slight stinky smell remaining, but you still feel ok. Then think of people you know who may have died from cigarettes, then think of ugly pictures you've seen of cancer victims without their throat or whatever. Try to end with some image or situation that has a negative emotional feeling for you, the stronger the better.

      Try to imagine each step vividly, the good to bad. At first it might not work really well, because you have to force yourself to connect the steps along the way, but pretty soon the connections from one imagination to the next will grow stronger, until it happens automatically. If it's a really strong urge (rare) this will only weaken it, so after you've completed the process, you can do it again with a different negative ending.

      (I may have gotten the details wrong about how nicotine feels when it's good, but that's how I've dealt with other addictions).

      --
      Qxe4
    52. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Not quite. What I am saying is it is absurd to draw attention to barely detectable withdrawal symptoms, when WE KNOW it is safe... and 10K+ years of humans using it for all sorts of reasons pretty much proves this. What we have is a population of the extremely biased (and incorrect) socially stigmatifying the use of cannabis because of repeated falshoods (such as "it is a gateway drug"). Cannibis is a miracle drug if ever there was one, yet the moral majority believes it is more correct to control the way other people perceive something because they are disgusted by "potheads." It is far more socially acceptable to be addicted to atavan or oxycontin or ambien, when we have not yet learned the consequences or such prescriptions or addictions, nor any other "miracle" chemical that has been discovered, or invented, approved and pushed out by Big Pharm through doctors... within less than a decade.

    53. Re:Acetaminophen by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People are jumping down your throat, but there's an element of truth to what you said. THC withdrawal exists, but it's mild, pretty difficult to induce, and would not be relevant to OTC use. You really have to try hard to consume enough THC to cause habituation. I only ever experienced withdrawal symptoms after smoking pot constantly for weeks on end. Even then it was nothing more than a little irritability and difficulty sleeping for a couple days. These days I still smoke a lot of pot, but only during the evenings and weekends. When I run out it doesn't bother me at all.

      It's worth pointing out that there are several OTC drugs that cause withdrawal symptoms that are more severe than those from THC. Ever have a cold and take Afrin for a week? When you quit, there's a rebound effect (aka withdrawal symptoms). That rebound effect is far more unpleasant than THC withdrawal. The same goes for Benadryl. Then, of course, there's caffeine. Going THC free is no big deal for me (in fact I'm about 5 days out right now), going caffeine free scares the shit out of me.

      So you see, THC withdrawal exists but it's no big deal. It's well within the range of acceptable risks for OTC products.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    54. Re:Acetaminophen by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      ah, ad hominem, I know thee well.

      No, clearly you don't if you thought the GP's response was ad hominem.

    55. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said physically addictive and what you are describing is mentally addictive. I personally know a few people who are mentally addicted to marijuana and i know a lot more that use it occasionally that aren't even close to being addicted. Alcohol does much more damage to your body than marijuana but yet I can get it at every store.

    56. Re:Acetaminophen by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

      > most people experience anxiety, extreme agitation, loss of appetite, and even nightmares for several days afterwards.

      Quitting is a bit hard on the stoners too.

      --
      boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    57. Re:Acetaminophen by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, did you also smoke non-joints at the time? Or was the moment you stopped smoking pot also the moment you effectively stopped getting nicotine?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    58. Re:Acetaminophen by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      That is true. Very few people OD from OTC from acetaminophen. It usually comes from Lortab, Percocet, Lorcet, etc. A lot of MD's moved to Norco x/325 or Percocet x/325 after the acetaminophen studies came out a few months back.

      --
      Gone!
    59. Re:Acetaminophen by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the typos. Posting from my mobile.

      --
      Gone!
    60. Re:Acetaminophen by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoa dude, you read that link completely wrong, if that's our source.

      Habituation to alcohol most likely creates a increased risk of APAP poisoning.

      Acute alcohol ingestion reduces APAP toxicity.

      Alcohol habituation "primes the pump" so to speak, for conversion of APAP to toxic metabolites by P450 enzymes. But if you give large amounts of alcohol to someone who has excessive amounts of APAP in their bloodstream, that is what is protective, since the alcohol is preferentially taken up by the P450 enzymes.

      The lessons to be learned if you don't want APAP poisoning: (1) don't be a heavy drinker and take APAP and (2) if you do ingest a lot of APAP somehow, drink a lot of booze right away to keep it from poisoning your liver.

      This is not medical advice, contact a poison control center if you suspect you have any kind of poisoning.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    61. Re:Acetaminophen by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Too bad his source doesn't support his claim. (See my response to his post for details).

      And even if you fix his words so that his claim kind of makes sense, what he states definitively is expressed as "might" or "may be" in his source.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    62. Re:Acetaminophen by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      If you smoke cigarettes try using e-cigs then ramp down the nicotine. I know multiple people who quit thanks to them sometimes after decades of failed previous efforts.

      They let you fulfill your need to smoke while letting you quit nicotine. As I understand it smokers are crave the act of smoking almost as much as they do nicotine since like Pavlov's dogs your mind has linked the two feelings.

    63. Re:Acetaminophen by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Sounds like somebody has a case of the Mondays. :(

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    64. Re:Acetaminophen by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Who is most people? I've been off and on a heavy pot user for 15 years now, and have never experienced any withdrawal effects at all.

      - by 19thNervousBreakdown.

    65. Re:Acetaminophen by Stihdjia · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. This is a classic line from chronic government-lies believers. The fact is that when you quit, most people experience boredom. Anyone experiencing the symptoms you describe probably had them before they started smoking. I don't smoke, but even after long-term "soberness," I sure as hell wish I could.

      Marijuana was classed as a Schedule I narcotic pending the results of this study. I invite you to review this study yourself, as well as the implementation of its recommendations.

      --
      I see the fnords!
    66. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1

      it is absurd to draw attention to barely detectable withdrawal symptoms, when WE KNOW it is safe...

      This guy has a chip on his shoulder an no mistake. Drawing attention to the fact that this drug is like any other drug, it causes habituation and should be taken with respect.. really pisses him off. Also, I can't help but notice that there is a fair shake of paranoia in these posts... mccarthy, racists, big pharm... You _do_ know that one of the side effects of marijuana for a lot of people is paranoia, right?

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    67. Re:Acetaminophen by Achra · · Score: 1

      I don't smoke, but even after long-term "soberness," I sure as hell wish I could.

      Marijuana was classed as a Schedule I narcotic pending the results of this study. I invite you to review this study yourself, as well as the implementation of its recommendations.

      I find it interesting that all negative replies to my simple assertion that marijuana use is habit forming have had these 3 things in common:

      1) I don't know what I'm talking about. I certainly didn't come up with this idea from literally smoking my weight in weed.

      2) Marijuana isn't habit forming (Even though you state that you'd love to get at some, even after long-term sobriety)

      3) Lastly, all posts go into a rant about what caused marijuana to be illegalized in the first place, which is of course well documented, and completely irrelevant to the point. Alcohol is habit forming and legal, cigarettes are habit forming and legal. So what? What does habit-forming ability have shit to do with legality of the substance?

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    68. Re:Acetaminophen by aevan · · Score: 1

      Nah, you're just allergic to heat.

    69. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for me - I use cannabis for everything from a headache to PTSD. Why? Because it WORKS. APAP, Ibuprofin, and other NSAID's have never been able to curb my headaches.

      Ah, yes, nothing besides cannabis cures the headaches you get when you're not smoking cannabis. But, no, it's not habit forming at all. *rolls eyes*

    70. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey I've been hitting myself in the head with a rock for 15 years now and have nurble grundle gurmbll guurt.

    71. Re:Acetaminophen by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      take WoW away from a WoW user. Or anything else that is a habit or fun. I say this as someone who is not a user.

    72. Re:Acetaminophen by rhathar · · Score: 1

      I love sailing. I try and go sailing as often as I can afford and when I'm not sailing I'm thinking about it. If I am able to spend a lot of time on the water and then have to stop suddenly, I'm constantly distracted and will have vivid dreams about being on a boat. Ergo, sailing is more addictive than marijuana. My own personal experiences confirm it, because I've never experienced any of those sensations from smoking marijuana.

      --
      http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    73. Re:Acetaminophen by rhathar · · Score: 1

      By the way, look up behavioral addiction. In that context, it is possible to become addicted to marijuana. It's also possible to become addicted to gambling, sports, video games or (with practice) letting red fire ants crawl up and down the back of your throat.

      Marijuana, however, is not chemically addicting.

      --
      http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    74. Re:Acetaminophen by couchslug · · Score: 1

      In the '70s everyone I knew smoked massively. It was perfectly normal, and "head shops" were common even in expensive suburbs.
      If weed had any important nasty effects we'd be WELL aware of it after hundreds of millions of smokers worldwide.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    75. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha you fucking stoners are everywhere arnt you. Get your hippie drug rights bullshit off my news sites

    76. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 1

      ah, ad hominem, I know thee well.

      No, clearly you don't if you thought the GP's response was ad hominem.

      let me point it out to you:

      You get short-tempered and agitated from turning off the TV? Holy shit. Kill your tv now, man.

      Go smoke a blunt and talk about it some more

      Even though you don't notice... Ask your girlfriend what you're like...

      See it now? Those responses are not in any way related to my argument; they are personal attacks.

    77. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 1

      This guy can in no way contradict nor add anything to the thread, so he must attack me personally. Make no mistake, his argument is an ad hominem fallacy.

    78. Re:Acetaminophen by catmistake · · Score: 1

      The perfect troll! I suppose you're now reading and trolling all my posts. I am honored.

    79. Re:Acetaminophen by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You get short-tempered and agitated from turning off the TV? Holy shit. Kill your tv now, man.

      He was responding to your claim that turning off the TV causes you withdrawal and makes you irritable and suggesting that you get rid of the TV in that case.

      Go smoke a blunt and talk about it some more

      Perhaps not relevant, but hardly an "attack"

      Even though you don't notice them doesn't mean that everyone around you doesn't notice them as well. Ask your girlfriend what you're like when you don't have anything to smoke.

      Notice that I quoted the whole sentence, not your carefully edited version. Again, he was making the point that even though YOU don't notice being irritable, that doesn't mean you aren't. Ask the people around you.

      Is it because you have a tiny penis that you're so insecure and every statement directed at you feels like an "attack" to you?

      See now that's ad hominem.

    80. Re:Acetaminophen by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      It takes >4 grams/day to overdose. It's far from "ridiculously easy". You can have 8 extra-strength Tylenol in a day and still be okay. /pharmicist

      http://www.drugs.com/acetaminophen.html

      The difference between the normal adult recommended max dosing on the package and toxic overdose is only a factor of two. That's for an average weight adult and not a skinny little 110-lb woman. Normal pediatric dosing is up to 105mg/kg/day (up to 5-doses a day at 10mg/kg) but the overdose threshold is only 150mg/kg/day. A 100-lb 12 year old taking the recommended dose is getting 72 mg/kg/day or about 1/2 the toxic dose. Forget letting your cat or dog eat the pill you accidentally dropped on the floor. Too often people don't know the difference between tsp and tbs or think its safe to double up on the dose.

      Yeah, I would call that ridiculously easy to overdose.

    81. Re:Acetaminophen by segwonk · · Score: 1


      Fact? Quitting cannabis give you extreme agitation, loss of appetite?

      Sorry dude - just. plain. wrong.

      --
      - ------ Go 'til ya know.
    82. Re:Acetaminophen by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I can't help but notice that there is a fair shake of paranoia in these posts... mccarthy, racists, big pharm... You _do_ know that one of the side effects of marijuana for a lot of people is paranoia, right?

      That shit is well documented history dude. Get off slashdot and go read a book or two.

      (never smoked pot in my life)

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    83. Re:Acetaminophen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tea party?

    84. Re:Acetaminophen by AhabTheArab · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Roll your eyes all you want. A small toke is all that is needed - not even enough to get high. It works much more reliably and is much faster acting than traditional OTC pain relievers. I'm not saying they're useless - they sometimes work for a mild headache or a hangover headache, but why bother when I have found something else that works better, faster, and more reliably?

  5. Or Chinese... by TheLink · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just spread some rumour to the Chinese that the rare "Guam strain" is good for erectile dysfunction, "general health" or whatever, and it'll soon be close enough to extinction. ;).

    --
    1. Re:Or Chinese... by catmistake · · Score: 1

      perfect!

  6. What are they going to use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When the Ice Zombie Rats who are incapable of feeling pain attack?

  7. Attach parachutes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to catch in the trees or else the frozen mice will just wind up on the ground. Also this will only work for some time until the stupid snakes die off, only the wise snakes will remain and then they will breed smarter snakes.

    1. Re:Attach parachutes.... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also this will only work for some time until the stupid snakes die off, only the wise snakes will remain and then they will breed smarter snakes.

      Then they can drop smarter dead frozen mice to kill them as well. Er, well, or something like that.

    2. Re:Attach parachutes.... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. Another slashdolt who thinks natural solution works by magic.

      This ploy doesn't select in favor of "wise" snakes. It selects in favor of snakes that have an aversion to the mice for some reason, which is only meaningful if (1) such snakes exist, and (2) the aversion is not correlated with some other factor that limits breeding, and (3) the aversion is genetic.

      It is possible that those three things will turn out to be true. Lacking a field test, I guess we don't know if any snakes have an aversion to the bait. It seems unlikely to me, but who knows?

      Possible or not, though, it is far from the foregone conclusion you would suggest.

    3. Re:Attach parachutes.... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2, Informative

      seems pretty likely to me, a lot of snakes won't eat their prey unless it's moving, this will probably re-enforce that trait.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    4. Re:Attach parachutes.... by delinear · · Score: 1

      FTFA:

      Initially mice were tested with a variety of 'delivery systems' until researchers with the National Wildlife Researcher Center in Fort Collins, Colorado settled on a streamer attached to cardboard on which the mouse is affixed via glue. This contraption is meant to catch in the tree tops: perfectly positioning itself for hungry brown tree snakes.

      Seems like they already figured out the parachute idea.

    5. Re:Attach parachutes.... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Well, either you're right and it won't work at all; or the team that's actually studied the problem and run tests is right and there's a good chance that any such problem has been overcome. (Can you guess whom I think is more likely to know what they're talking about?)

      But the ultimate success or failure of the plan is beside the point. Focus. I was responding to a claim about natural selection. The claim was based on elevation of natural selection to a mystical process that will maek a species survive anything that happens. That's not how it works. If you're right, then the species will survive due to a trait that's already dominant; no adaptation required, no temporary period where the plan seems to be working.

      In an environment where evolution as a theory is under attack, misrepresenting it as a panacea is a Bad Idea.

    6. Re:Attach parachutes.... by mrogers · · Score: 1

      seems pretty likely to me, a lot of snakes won't eat their prey unless it's moving, this will probably re-enforce that trait.

      Oh fantastic, so we're creating selection pressure for ADHD? Now we'll have to bomb the island with live kittens laced with Ritalin...

    7. Re:Attach parachutes.... by RancidPeanutOil · · Score: 1

      meh, why don't they just have a dude with a staple gun and little packs of tylenol sitting in the back of a cargo plane - just hand him a mouse, staple the acetaminophen to its head, and drop. Or better yet, staple it to their genitals - in case some survive the drop, the staple, and the snakes.

    8. Re:Attach parachutes.... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      i'd say they have run tests and that the trait is not dominant; this will probably work in the short term. However it is dominant in other species of snakes and given the population density of the snakes i would *guess* it's quite likely that they have a short breeding cycle which would help to encourage it to occur in this species as well, much like a very large portion of rabbits in australia are now resistant to myxomatosis. i mostly hassled you because the guy was probably trying to make a sub-par joke about super-snakes and i wanted to cut them a little slack tho :)

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  8. Isn't there any way to snake-proof the lines? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Rig snake-zappers midway up the poles? :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  9. And Up the Food Chain? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    I guess all those warnings about how Tylenol can damage your liver are true!

    Once the dead snakes are doped on acetaminophen, don't they face the risk of whatever native species might eat them overdosing on acetaminophen? As I've said before, I steer clear of all that crap.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      What causes liver failure is the work done by the liver to break down the acetaminophen into relatively harmless compounds. That's probably why they chose this form of poisoning - no risk of bioaccumulation.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Once the dead snakes are doped on acetaminophen, don't they face the risk of whatever native species might eat them overdosing on acetaminophen

      Probably not. The snake will die after its liver wears itself out breaking down the Acetaminophen. All that will be left in the snake is a worn-out liver and non-toxic Acetaminophen metabolites.

      Arsenic, by contrast, doesn't "break down". It's an element, so it kills you and remains Arsenic. Other poisons would likely behave similarly. My guess is that Tylenol (I'm tired of typing the long word) was chosen *because* it's less likely to perpetuate in the food chain. In fact, I think it would be just about impossible for it to get beyond two layers -- the liver of whatever eats the snake should take care of the excess with no trouble.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, I think it would be just about impossible for it to get beyond two layers -- the liver of whatever eats the snake should take care of the excess with no trouble.

      Isn't that exactly what the GP suggested? How robust are bird's livers? Some amount of the acetaminophen is still in the blood of the snake when it dies ... otherwise how does it get to the liver to be broken down?

    4. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by delinear · · Score: 1

      Plus I'm guessing there's not a lot of whatever eats snakes on the island, or there'd not be such a big issue in the first place.

    5. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably not. The snake will die after its liver wears itself out breaking down the Acetaminophen. All that will be left in the snake is a worn-out liver and non-toxic Acetaminophen metabolites.

            Actually, acetaminophen is not toxic, but one of its metabolites, NAPQI (N-acetyl-p-benzo-quinone imine) is the one that does the damage by depleting the body's supply of glutathione which is a necessary chemical for many liver reactions. The rapid depletion of glutathione causes liver cells to become exposed to damage from free radicals and other, regular body toxins that would normally be metabolized. This is why acetaminophen toxicity is characteristic for causing centri-lobular necrosis - cells closest to the branch of the portal vein (And hence exposed to the highest concentrations of Acetaminophen-->NAPQI) tend to die first, cells further away tend to hang on to greater supplies of glutathione and survive to process the remaining NAPQI.

      Since I'm a medical doctor and not a vet I am unaware as to the specific toxicity mechanism in cats and snakes, but it probably also has to do with this toxic NAPQI metabolite.

      Insofar as your argument I would venture that the dead snakes would be full of NAPQI, an unhealthy surprise for any critter eating them that was unable to metabolize this chemical.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Awesomely informative post, thanks!

      Insofar as your argument I would venture that the dead snakes would be full of NAPQI, an unhealthy surprise for any critter eating them that was unable to metabolize this chemical.

      But does the NAPQI metabolite actually make it into the bloodstream of the scavenger or bird that eats the dead/dying snake? If we (or more accurately, they) are lucky, maybe it gets broken down in the digestive tract before causing any trouble.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by nathan+s · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is a journal article which discusses the acetaminophen toxicity in snakes and lizards. Apparently there are two theories - glutathione depletion leading to hepatic necrosis as you mentioned, or methemoglobinemia, which is apparently a condition where normal oxygen-carrying hemoglobin is replaced by methemoglobin, which does not carry oxygen and effectively causes death due to cellular oxgyen deprivation (I wonder if this would explain the findings of clear fluid in the lungs/trachea of the snakes/lizards they tested this on?). I'm not a doctor or a chemist, by the way, just found it interesting.

    8. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      There could be a lot of whatever eats dead snakes.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    9. Re:And Up the Food Chain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize a second year med student was considered a "medical doctor."

  10. Oblig. Simpsons by LordBmore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lisa: But isn't that a bit short-sighted? What happens when we're overrun by lizards?
    Skinner: No problem. We simply release wave after wave of Chinese needle snakes. They'll wipe out the lizards.
    Lisa: But aren't the snakes even worse?
    Skinner: Yes, but we're prepared for that. We've lined up a fabulous type of gorilla that thrives on snake meat.
    Lisa: But then we're stuck with gorillas!
    Skinner: No, that's the beautiful part. When wintertime rolls around, the gorillas simply freeze to death.

  11. Guam will smell great once the mice thaw out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now the entire island will smell like rotting mice and snakes... Good Job USDA.

  12. Last time I checked by maroberts · · Score: 1

    A large number of birds were omnivorous. Why is this likely only to take out the snakes?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Last time I checked by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Are birds similarly poisoned by acetaminophen? And do they eat carrion?

  13. I've had it! by doc_holliday814 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have had it with these motherfucking snakes on this motherfucking island!

  14. Won't work by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most snakes won't eat carrion. The prey has to be moving to trigger hunting, and then feeding behavior.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Won't work by smitty777 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about that too. I don't think they'll eat a frozen mouse dangling on a string. We have a constrictor at home that we feed frozen mice - you have to un-freez them and kinda wiggle them around to get her attention. Since they've gone to all this trouble so far, maybe they can implant a little electric motor in each mouse. Perhaps some usability testing might be in order.

      --
      "Before God we are all equally wise - and equally foolish"
      Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Won't work by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you know that this is a species that won't eat a cold mouse or are you just spreading FUD?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Won't work by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's Guam (average temp 30C). Something the size of a mouse isn't going to stay frozen very long. The mice are attached to streamers so they get caught in the tree tops (where the snakes are) and get moved by air currents. They are testing it now, having already dropped 250 mice.

    4. Re:Won't work by need4mospd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Snakes eat dead mice all the time. I fed mine live ones for a couple years then switched because it's actually a recommended practice among the snake owner community. They really don't care.

    5. Re:Won't work by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

      Most snakes won't eat carrion. The prey has to be moving to trigger hunting, and then feeding behavior.

      I'm seeing disagreement with this, but as a snake owner, I can attest Hatta is essentially correct. Snakes who are raised on dead prey will feed on them, but once a snake is exposed to live prey, they will essentially scorn dead prey unless they are extremely hungry. And the Guam snakes will still have their regular prey available, so I would assume that only a very small percentage of the snakes will consume the frozen mice.

    6. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fear, uncertainty and doubt? I mean, if he said, "The snakes won't eat the mice! We're all going to die!!" your accusation would make sense. Uncertainty, yes, but perfectly warrented given his knowledge of other snakes.

    7. Re:Won't work by osjedi · · Score: 1

      I scrolled through all the traffic looking to see if anyone else was thinking this too. I've had snakes as a kid and had friends with various species of snake. None would ever eat carrion. If it didn't twitch or scamper it was off the menu.

      --
      -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
    8. Re:Won't work by torgis · · Score: 1
      Not true. I feed my snakes frozen mice all the time and it doesn't bother them one bit. They don't even have to be moving - just drop it in on the warming rock and the snakes notice right away.

      This is also the preferred method for squeamish snake owners. Baby mice tend to, uh, shriek, when the snake latches onto their head. Dead mice offer no such complaints.

  15. BS by Stargoat · · Score: 0

    This is a big load of BS.

    If you want to get rid of this snake, just get 5000 soldiers. Give them each of them a Mossberg 500 pump action shotgun and as much number 9 or 10 shot shells as they can carry. The army has more than enough shotguns and the shells . Then, give the soldiers 10 dollars for every dead snake and dead cat they bring back. There's only like 263 square miles on this island. The whole job could be finished in under a week. (Feral cats are doing more damage to the environment than the cats, but it's not cool to talk about it. Cats are cute. Snakes kill you.)

    People forget that the simplest solution tends to be the best one. They also forget what a regiment of men with guns can accomplish. There's a reason that the bison almost went extinct. As well as many subspecies of rattlesnake.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:BS by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      Did you read the summary? While I am sure the results would be brilliant YouTube (or Darwin awards) material, how do you get hundreds of men with shotguns up into the tree canopy?

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    2. Re:BS by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Much better than men, easily can get into canopies. Can come home to recharge before going out for more hunting.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvRTALJp8DM

      Aggressive Maneuvers for Autonomous Quadrotor Flight, University of Pennsylvania GRASP Lab

    3. Re:BS by xenapan · · Score: 0

      "how do you get hundreds of men with shotguns up into the tree canopy?"

      JETPACKS.

      FTFY

      --
      insert funny sig here
    4. Re:BS by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of a shotgun. It can hit stuff from the ground.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  16. Who says only snakes will eat them? by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny
    Is it like snakes have these tiny microwaves so they can thaw them out and no other animal can?

    Didn't think so.

    1. Re:Who says only snakes will eat them? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Read TFA - it's actually a pretty cool idea for a delivery mechanism. Not failsafe, but pretty neat.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Who says only snakes will eat them? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      No, their delivery mechanism has serious flaws. It was designed to be cheap and fast, and not to tangle when being deployed (like small parachutes would), so of course, they're going to either make it to the ground, or get stuck on a leaf - not a branch. First rain or even a good wind, and the leaf tears, sending the mouse to the ground.

      And since it will be a day before the mouse thaws out enough to be attractive (and how sticky can the glue be at sub-zero temps - they only tested 250 in individual hand drops so the glue was already at room temp), these mice are going to be eaten by a lot more than snakes.

    3. Re:Who says only snakes will eat them? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Delivery mechanism aside, my original point was to address the concept of "and up the food chain" as this thread was named by GP.

      Acetaminophen is not like, say, a neurotoxin that may remain chemically unaltered within the host and can be consumed by subsequent predators. Tylenol kills because the liver is damaged (to the point of failure) in the process of breaking it down into byproducts. The byproducts are not themselves toxic, so a dead snake (or a dead rodent or a dead fish in the case of a delivery mechanism failure) isn't going to present the same risk to the next scavenger in the chain.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  17. Please, please, please by kieran · · Score: 1

    ... tell me the mice will each have their own little biodegradable parachute to help them get stuck up in the trees where the snakes are.

    1. Re:Please, please, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      TFA says they're gluing the frozen mice to sheets of cardboard so they get stuck in the trees. Biodegradable? Eventually, I suppose.

      Really, it wasn't a very long article.

    2. Re:Please, please, please by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Didn't the article spell that out for you? Oh wait, this IS slashdot...

    3. Re:Please, please, please by hey! · · Score: 1

      "Biodegradable" isn't some kind of exotic material property. They're using cardboard.

      Non-biodegradability is something that we've engineered into materials we want to persist for a minimum length of time. We just haven't paid quite as much attention to the *maximum* lifespan because once the consumer takes Barbie out of her packaging, the fate of that packaging is so far removed from the manufacturer it is somebody else's problem.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  18. invasive alien species by meglon · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to just taking off and nuking them from orbit? It's the only way to be sure after all.

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
    1. Re:invasive alien species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ever happened to just taking off and nuking them from orbit? It's the only way to be sure after all.

      I bet it would also cut down the number of locals who are angry about snakes assuming the snakes do survivor the bombing.

  19. I'm more concerned... by murpium · · Score: 1

    that the overflow of mice will cause the island to capsize... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg&t=1m16s

  20. Don't drop too many frozen mice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or Guam might capsize.

  21. Nothing else eats mice on the island? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    So, what's going to eat the mice other than the snakes?

    1. Re:Nothing else eats mice on the island? by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Probably cats, which also will die after ingesting the smallest amount of acetaminophen.

      Of course, any cats on Guam would be non-native, and also cause serious disruptions to local wildlife, so its probably a good thing if they get killed off too...

      Liver failure is a brutal way to do it though, poor cats....

  22. idiot by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    and as much number 9 or 10 shot shells

    Which contain lead. Which will leach into the water table. It's a realistic problem for the quantities you're talking about.

    People forget that the simplest solution tends to be the best one. They also forget what a regiment of men with guns can accomplish

    And people are also idiots who forget that when a mommy snake and a daddy snake meet by chance in a forest, they have zillions of baby snakes shortly thereafter. Invasive species which are overrunning a habitat are doing so because they have no natural predators and an abundant food source.

    Growth is exponential . Unless you have less than 2 snakes remaining, you're screwed in another few years again. And if you only have one, you better make sure it's not pregnant.

    1. Re:idiot by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      There are a few non-toxic shot types available, such as bismuth and soft iron. Required for all waterfowl in the US, also required for many areas due to wetlands, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    2. Re:idiot by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      There are also steel and copper pellets.

    3. Re:idiot by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      The steel in steel shot is soft iron. :)

      Copper plated pellets are usually lead on the inside.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:idiot by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Copper plated pellets are usually lead on the inside.

      I've never seen copper plated pellets...only solid copper pellets and steel. Technically iron is not steel - but iron is used to create steel. I'd never actually heard of "soft iron" outside of old musket lore and then, never in modern use.

    5. Re:idiot by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      OK, so the "steel" and "steel shot" should've been in quotes.

      Copper plated pellets are common in larger birdshot sizes and buckshot - think loads for geese, turkeys, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  23. invasive species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    er, aren't ALL species of life "invasive"?
    Is it a "pest" or just a species of animal life that thrives in the rain forest?
    Driving other species to extinction is what species do, so not really relevant as a "justification".

    "Eradicating the snake is a priority because it triggers more than 100 power outages a year at a cost of $1-4 million"
    ah, so it is all about the money. Ok.

    So just say we don't like snakes and they're costing us cash.
    Now, our plan.....is to drop drug-laced dead mice with garbage (streamers) attached into the tops of island rainforests.
    Humanity is so freaking brillant sometimes that it hurts my eyes. I really enjoy COPS too.

  24. Nobody by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Tell this to Hank Johnson, because now he'll really think that Guam will tip over...

    Remember, you vote for these people.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Nobody by moogied · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually I don't vote. Just so people that say stupid things like "You vote for them!" are horribly wrong. Jerk.

      --
      So basically, -1 troll/offtopic is really slashdots way of saying "I hate that you thought of something before me."
    2. Re:Nobody by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually I don't vote. Just so people that say stupid things like "You vote for them!" are horribly wrong. Jerk.

            Since I am not a US citizen, you are more likely to have voted for this person than me. However well done in taking an extremely general comment very personally. I can just imagine what it must be like to sit as a passenger in your car in heavy traffic, and I despair for any partner you have or may have in the future. May your life continue to be full of rage and hate. Certainly this will lead to an early grave.

            On the other hand, consider the possibility that the world does not care about you at all, and internet comments are not all malicious attempts at slandering your "good name" since frankly you are not important enough for anyone to give a shit about.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  25. What? Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already did it last week!

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/23/pacific_zombie_mouse_paratroops/

    According to Stars and Stripes, the first waves of dead killer mouse drug paratroopers went in to the jungles surrounding Sasebo Naval Base Guam [on September 22nd]

  26. This Failed in NYC by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    NYC tried this kind of stupid stunt to attack our rats with imported possums. The possums didn't kill the rats, and now Brooklyn is infested with rats and possums.

    I expect Guam will remain overrun by snakes, and get overrun by mice. So they'll send in the possums, and Guam will be overrun by snakes, mice and possums.

    Why can't we learn that simple attacks on complex problems often just make the problem more complex? Hamfisted slaps at nature always have unintended consequences.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:This Failed in NYC by Straterra · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know where you live, but where I'm from dead, frozen mice don't do any kind of (over)running. I think freezing them counts as "simple."

    2. Re:This Failed in NYC by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It got worse in australia.

      Some settler wanted to hunt rabbits because he wanted sports, so he imported and released a few. Sure enough they quickly bred like, well, rabbits. Having no enemies, their numbers overwhelmed the unaccustomed australian outback.

      So they imported foxes to eat them. But the foxes quickly discovered native species were slower and easier prey, so now the flora AND fauna was threatened.

      So they developed a rabbit cancer called Myxomatosis and unleashed it on australian rabbits. Which made its wayt back to europe, ravaging rabbit populations THERE.

      All because some australian dude was bored for some sport.

    3. Re:This Failed in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the surface, an Aussie and a redneck might seem to have a lot in common, but when us rednecks get bored for sport, we just go shoot up stop signs, powerline insulators, and the odd cityslicker's cat or fluffdog. When an Aussie gets bored, he casually sets in motion a chain of events that will ravage ecosystems across multiple continents -- then sits back, drinks beer, and watches it all go down.

      You gotta hand it to them Aussies, man.

    4. Re:This Failed in NYC by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Balanced eco-system + imported snake = Threatened wildlife

      Balanced eco-system + imported snake + poison = Balanced eco-system - anything that eats dead mice

      It's like throwing a molotov-cocktail in a car to remove tissues after you had a severe cold. You never know what the collateral damage might be.

    5. Re:This Failed in NYC by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's a bad example. We can all agree that the whole car and any contents would be collateral...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:This Failed in NYC by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Actually, Aussies and rednecks are the same people. They're both mainly Scots-Irish and some English who got caught in Britain's debt/colonization system, and sent to the wilderness either as prisoners or colonists. Mainly they were conquered people north of London, either Scotland or nearby, who first took over lands in Ireland when Oliver Cromwell conquered and devastated its tribes, then moved overseas when the British Army did even more devastation there.

      As for ecosystem damage, you just don't notice how rednecks devastated North America's ecosystem because it's had a couple more centuries than Australia to reach a new balance, and because Australia's ecosystem was already much more different from Europe's than was North America's.

      Aussies are rednecks. Just look at their necks!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:This Failed in NYC by TrentTheThief · · Score: 3, Informative

      The chance of tylenol (the substance inside the frozen mice) destroying the eco-system on Guam is so minuscule, as to be impossible.

      On the other hand, the damned snakes _are_ destroying the eco-system.

      I was stationed on Guam. I loved it. Great jungle, nice mountains, clear streams and beautiful beaches. But most of all, no damned snakes.

      The only difference between Hawaii and Guam is that no one thought to get tough about preventing idiots from bringing snakes to Guam.

    8. Re:This Failed in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The article addressed your concern...they said they developed specialized delivery systems that would get stuck in the canopies of the trees to prevent the tainted mice from reaching the ground where other species could be affected. I'm sure a few will make their way down, but from the sound of it the snakes have been the dominant species in the tree canopies and should be pretty effectively targeted so long as the delivery system is effective.

    9. Re:This Failed in NYC by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was stationed on Guam too, from '02 through '08. Definitely a beautiful island.

      To be fair, it wasn't that the snakes were *permitted*, but rather that the snakes (presumably) stowed away on a ship, and Hawaii only really cracked down after seeing what happened on Guam. While Hawaii has so far escaped the same level of ecological damage, there are still snakes found every year, and it is unknown whether the tree snake has established a colony on one or more of the Hawaiian islands (with the general consensus of "more likely than not"). You can be sure Hawaii will watching the results of this experiment very closely.

      The chance of tylenol (the substance inside the frozen mice) destroying the eco-system on Guam is so minuscule, as to be impossible. On the other hand, the damned snakes _are_ destroying the eco-system.

      This. There simply aren't any indigenous vertebrates on Guam *to* be affected, and non-indigenous species like the monitor lizard can always be re-introduced should anyone feel it necessary (which I strongly doubt). All native bird species are technically extinct in the wild, existing only in captivity, save the few birds that have been reintroduced on a trial basis. At worst, this program would push back the potential earliest date for full reintroduction, which is a small price to pay for so thoroughly tipping the odds of success of reintroduction.

      As for the power outages, they're a bit of a red herring IMO. There are still random outages (or at least there were when I left), but putting snake-guards on the poles eliminated most of the problems, and most of the ongoing outages seemed to be attributable to problems at the plant (*cough* incompetence and indifference *cough*).

    10. Re:This Failed in NYC by ralfmuschall · · Score: 1

      There is a theory that the intention of the rabbit import was even worse: Some english aristocrazies wanted to go hunting foxes, and their idea was that the wild foxes need something to eat, so they introduced rabbits as well.

    11. Re:This Failed in NYC by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A woman I worked with who would have been of my parents generation (born in the 1940s or so) told me that in the 1950s she drove from Melbourne to Adelaide and back with her family. Both ways they had to stop every 50 miles so her dad could prise the dead rabbits out of the wheel bays.

      From the same time, my dad told me he used to roam the countryside around his aunt's place in Violet Town for days, living on rabbit. They weren't hard to catch. Just chuck a good pocket knife and have your camp fire ready.

    12. Re:This Failed in NYC by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      We have rednecks here in Australia too. More than we need actually need. Want some? Curiously a lot of the immigrants from Europe I meet tend to be of the redneck variety. Perhaps they are refugees from the typically more left wing environment in their home countries. While US immigrants tend to be more left wing. A lot of the members of our right wing nationalist party were actually immigrants from the UK.

    13. Re:This Failed in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find that the foxes were also imported for sport, thanks to the typically british tradition of fox hunting. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feral_foxes_in_Australia)

      Additionally, if you want to hunt in Australia, you're better off nutting up and hunting camels (another introduced and then essentially abandoned species) or kangaroos (who's breeding cycle is dictated by available resources and underwent a population explosion as a result of agricultural development).

      Now I'm just waiting for cane toads to grow big enough to justify the use of hunting rifles.

    14. Re:This Failed in NYC by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But they can use the "power outages" excuse to justify the cost, and possibly even fund the effort. Saving birds from extinction has popular appeal but doesn't have a "return on investment" in the classic economic sense, so it takes much more effort to fund it (volunteers, donations, conservation groups, scientific studies, etc.) But presenting it to the executives as "we'll solve your four million dollar snake problem for only a few thousand dollars" is a no-brainer.

      And yes, I know this is being done by the U.S. Government, and they love nothing better than spending my money, but if the line item in the budget says "($3,900,000), savings due to spending $100,000 to kill snakes causing $4,000,000 in annual damage" then some senator will no doubt claim wins to both parties: "I'm prudent, I saved $3.9 million dollars" and "I'm green, I helped save six endangered species."

      --
      John
    15. Re:This Failed in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually he would have been english...

    16. Re:This Failed in NYC by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      From the same time, my dad told me he used to roam the countryside around his aunt's place in Violet Town for days, living on rabbit.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabbit_starvation

      Man cannot live on rabbit alone.

      If there are enough rabbits, the people eat till their stomachs are distended; but no matter how much they eat they feel unsatisfied.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    17. Re:This Failed in NYC by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Days, not years. In later years a relative cooked rabbit drumsticks for us. Quite good but you have to be careful to pick the right animals, given the amount of biological warfare used against them here.

    18. Re:This Failed in NYC by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      I was there 30 years before you. The snakes I heard about were brought in as pets by fisherman.

      At that time, Hawaii was already paranoid about snakes.

      We probably have different sources of information.

    19. Re:This Failed in NYC by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      So they developed a rabbit cancer called Myxomatosis and unleashed it on australian rabbits. Which made its wayt back to europe, ravaging rabbit populations THERE.

      They didn't "develop" anything. Myxomatosis is caused by a natural virus in the pox family that was discovered in Uruguay in the 1800s.

      It isn't cancer. It doesn't cause cancer. The rabbits develop tumors, yes. But not all tumors are cancer.

      It also didn't "make its way back to Europe," it was intentionally introduced in the UK after WWII to control rabbit populations there, which is how it got to Europe.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    20. Re:This Failed in NYC by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Excellent point.

    21. Re:This Failed in NYC by richlv · · Score: 1

      it's much, much worse than that. it will get overrun by dead, frozen zombie mice.

      --
      Rich
    22. Re:This Failed in NYC by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Ah, ok. The USGS go by the stowaway theory, though it's hard to say whether they're parroting rumor, or vice-versa. We'll probably never know for sure.

    23. Re:This Failed in NYC by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      The fisherman on the south side were smuggling anything you could ask for onto the island.Otherwise, I'd be okay with the stowaway theory, too.

      Snakes and idiot servicemen. It's a combination you can't beat.

  27. oblig by Myopic · · Score: 1

    acetaminophen!? YOUcetaminophen! oh girl! you have no faith in medicine!

  28. Better solution: Whacking Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just get somebody to organize all the Simpsons fans in the world, and hold a real-life Whacking Day on Guam. I guarantee you the problem will be solved by the end of the day.

  29. The sequel from "Snakes on a plane" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mice on a plane" ! Wondorgasmic!

  30. Nice by NetServices · · Score: 1

    An ingenious idea! if it works

  31. "First they came ..." by wsanders · · Score: 4, Funny

    "First they came for the snakes,
    but I didn't eat because I don't eat Tylenol-laced frozen mice...."

    Oh wait, thought this was Y.R.O. ... nevermind.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  32. St. Patrick by nickovs · · Score: 1

    Legend has it that before trying the whole "standing on a hill, waving a staff and praying a lot" thing, St. Patrick tried bombing Ireland with frozen rodents laced with Tylenol. Sadly, it was quickly discovered that eating these dead mice cured hangovers and the indigenous population got to them before the snakes did, at which point St. Patrick had to resort to miracles. It is not widely known that until quite recently eating various sorts of dead muridae was a folk cure for headaches in Ireland but for some reason it's not been that effective since St. Paddy died, a little over 1,500 years ago.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  33. Overheard in Guam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot! I told you the snakes ARE a headache!!

  34. They should try opossums by __roo · · Score: 2, Insightful
  35. PETA by AlfaMike · · Score: 1

    I wonder what they think about this.

    1. Re:PETA by uncanny · · Score: 1

      But do you care? I wouldn't put it past those short-sighted people to say this is a horrible thing to do to snakes while the snakes are killing off other species anyways.

  36. That's a stupid idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, have anyone done the calculations to make sure Guam wont capsize under the weight of the extra frozen mice?

  37. So that's where all the recalled Tylenol went... by aarongadberry · · Score: 1

    They sold it to the government! We are such suckers.

  38. Yet another short-sighted attempt to manage nature by Attila · · Score: 1

    Let's just see how the snake population changes when the females no longer have headaches.

    --
    Dear Will, the plums were poisoned. -- Cheese Club
  39. Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't snakes have a heat-vision-esque based eye sight? As in, when looking for food, they look for the warm red blobs... So what snake in his/her right mind would suddenly find the blue blob, frozen mice tantalizing?

  40. Motherf*cking Snakes by Dthief · · Score: 1

    Get these motherf*cking snakes off this motherf*cking island

    --
    www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    1. Re:Motherf*cking Snakes by cifey · · Score: 1

      Where's a good Jedi when you need him?

      --
      Hello Cruel World
  41. Snakes detect prey by sensing their heat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snakes detect prey by sensing their heat. Why would they eat a frozen or even room temperature mouse?

    1. Re:Snakes detect prey by sensing their heat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some snakes, pit vipers, have heat sensing organs. Most don't. The Brown Tree Snake is not a pit viper.

  42. Blunts = Nicotine by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    If you were smoking blunts, what you were experiencing was most likely NICOTINE withdrawl. You do realize that cigar wrappers are made of tobacco, right?

    Severe withdrawl symptoms from cannabis itself are pretty much unknown. Tobacco, OTOH, is said by many to be as hard or harder to kick than heroin.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  43. only mice, not birds? by dltaylor · · Score: 1

    If the snakes live in the canopy, and are wiping out bird populations, maybe some bird baits would be a good addition to the control attempt.

  44. Ob joke by formfeed · · Score: 1

    Whatever

  45. This Works For Rabies... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    This works very well in controlling rabies in wild populations of scavengers and carnivores.

    Acceptance of oral baits by dogs was evaluated in Guatemala. Eight bait matrix/attractant combinations were produced using commercial materials available in the United States. Two baits were produced using local materials in Guatemala. All baits included a plastic sachet that contained a placebo vaccine (water). Bait trials were conducted February–April, 2002, at five sites using 261 dogs. Bait acceptance ranged from 50.0% to 87.1%, and the combined proportion of sachets either swallowed or punctured ranged from 23.1% to 83.9%. The four bait types with the highest acceptance by dogs were the wax-coated sachet coated with poultry oil and poultry meal (87.1%), the dog meal polymer coated with poultry oil and poultry meal (82.8%), the fish meal polymer coated with poultry oil and poultry meal (77.4%), and the chicken head bait (77.8%). These four bait types were accepted most often as determined both by consumption and combined proportion of sachets swallowed or punctured (P = 0.0001). Future trials should demonstrate efficacy of oral rabies vaccination in Guatemala based on the use of selected bait matrices and the poultry oil/poultry meal attractant. (More here.)

    --
    [End Of Line]
  46. In other news... by cstacy · · Score: 1

    I swear to God I thought turkeys could fly....

  47. For a minute there... by The+Brother+Grim · · Score: 1

    ... I misread acetaminophen for amphetamine and pondered what an island of pissed-off, speed-addled brown tree snakes would look like.

  48. A better idea by conscarcdr · · Score: 1

    Send in the Cantonese. -Your Chinese friend.

  49. They found a buyer for contaminated Tylenol! by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    So that's why Johnson & Johnson McNeil is so happy. They can claim those products were not really intended for human consumption. Of course they also claim acetaminophen is perfectly safe and doesn't cause long term liver damage in humans.

    Did nobody point out that most snakes prefer live prey. Especially TREE snakes that generally don't scour the ground looking for food? Sounds like they'll end up killing other animals like birds, but wait aren't they trying to kill the snakes to save the birds?

  50. The Headline Reads... by Duggeek · · Score: 1

    Rigor Rodents to Rain on Scrappy Snake Scourge Thoroughly Tainted with Tylenol

    ...FTW

    --
    This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  51. Besides acetaminaphen - Radios in Frozen Mice Drop by DarkStarZumaBeach · · Score: 1

    "If the current experiment works – scientists will know because they’re also packing the dead mice with radio transmitters for the snakes to ingest ..." -- CNN

    The tracking radios is an interesting note: Afterall, a mouse-kabob not dangling in a tree could be food for other predators as well and ingested by unintended (nontarget) animals such as dogs, cats, pigs, or monitor lizards. It would be good to track the corpsicle to make sure it is consumed by the target brown tree snakes, and not some other arboreal carrion feeder.

    On the other hand, if tracking radio, then why not go whole hog and provide tracking video? Pin hole videocams are a small additional payload and this might make it quicker to verify that the bait is finding its intended target.

    Now some bright spark out there is going to catch on really quick: There was a recent TEDtalk where Nathan Myhrvold seriously proposed developing a laser mosquito zapper to prevent diseases carried by mosqueto bites. See: "TED 2010: Death Star Laser Gun Zaps Mosquitoes Dead"

    If the key to this whole exercise is to dangle food in trees to find brown tree snakes in trees, then perhaps what is required is a tree monitoring system that detects snake motion in trees and lasers them out of the canopy. The image recognition problem is even simpler with power lines and utility poles, especially since a brown tree snake has a specific IR signature when it is in a tree.

    This has to be far easier than shooting down mosquitos, and the image processing requirement is less real-time intensive. Further, combat CO2 laser optics has certainly reached the pinnacle of point-and-shoot, so with an overhead laser platform, an entire forest could be quickly pruned of brown tree snakes -- even if the current population density exceeds 13,000 brown tree snakes per square mile.

    It is known that Guamians have developed recipes for roasted brown tree snake meat - so a high-powered laser application could also satisfy human market demands for prepared snake meat.

    Re-outfitting a small fleet of Predator UAV drones should allow deployment of a laser-based brown tree snake eradication program within the year while effectively addressing budget constraints of the ongoing brown tree snake control program. Manpower would not require additional UAV pilots stationed on Guam, but could be sourced from mainland US UAV piloting centers and trainees who need to log effective flight time experience before engaging in actual combat missions.

    With many available targets automatically selected for pilots to consider, a pilot's principal role will be to prevent mis-identified kills. With a maximum length of 3 meters, pilots will need to make sure that someone's pet python is not accidentally mistaken for a brown tree snake.

    --
    DarkStarZumaBeachSurfinApocalypseWow
  52. how dumb is this ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) They are completely covering up the fact that during WWII the military sprayed harsh chemicals all over Guam's jungles to destroy insects, and in doing that they poisoned our birds ecosystem and caused a rare disease known as "brittle shell" which prevents birds from ever regenerating offspring.

    2.) Over development is also a major cause for bird life and sea life deterioration.

    3.) Farmers still use harsh chemicals that also cause damage to our ecosystem...

    4.) Snakes play a role in our bird extinction as well, yet chickens survive....?