When using -c mode, I recommend using a short -D, and a shorter -l, so that the beeps don't blur together. Something like this will get you a cheesy 1970's style beep-as-you-type-each-letter effect
If you don't like a bunch of parent folders open, then open folders with a middle mouse click. Using the middle mouse button to open a child folder closses the parent. Using it on a parent folder, via the menu in the lower left, closes the cild. This makes it very easy to open multiple windows when you want (copying, moving, etc.) and to keep your desktop uncluttered when you don't.
I don't know which article you read, baquiano, but there was no mention of open source software. Is Venezuela looking for freedom or looking for a development process? I hope they want freedom. Too many people, I think, are afraid to use the term "free software" because it is seen as being assosiated with fanatics, or RMS. Don't be afraid. And don't be tricked into thinking that free software and open source software refer to the same thing.
Maybe there needs to be a distinction between and Open Source License and an Open Source Development Process.
Open Source software is based on a development process. You are asking for a distinction between Free Software and Open Source software witch does exist, but is often confused.
From the beep man page (in Debian):
Check again, you've got to do it the hard way:
- : float -> float -> float = <fun>
I only mention it because I love it and I don't think many of the persons who complain about spatial know about it.
If you don't like a bunch of parent folders open, then open folders with a middle mouse click. Using the middle mouse button to open a child folder closses the parent. Using it on a parent folder, via the menu in the lower left, closes the cild. This makes it very easy to open multiple windows when you want (copying, moving, etc.) and to keep your desktop uncluttered when you don't.
I don't know which article you read, baquiano, but there was no mention of open source software. Is Venezuela looking for freedom or looking for a development process? I hope they want freedom. Too many people, I think, are afraid to use the term "free software" because it is seen as being assosiated with fanatics, or RMS. Don't be afraid. And don't be tricked into thinking that free software and open source software refer to the same thing.
The summary is wrong. A 1-minute hover is all that is needed.
Open Source software is based on a development process. You are asking for a distinction between Free Software and Open Source software witch does exist, but is often confused.
Was that supposed to be a challenge?
Or am I not up to the Slashdot reading level yet?