Are there software bugs in any software Google is in control of yes or no answer you have no argument. Software is always tested now and there are bugs you have no argument. All it will take is 1 accident, 1 and Google car will be sued into oblivion.
I turn the key the car starts, i press the gas peddle the car moves, i turn the steering wheel the car turns,i step on the break the car stops. Want to rethink your poor statement?
Engineering is done by humans as as the thousands of poorly engineered building,bridges, cars, planes,trains, consumer products killing thousands/millions have shown us is that engineering is no guarantee of safety. So why should i trust Google to engeneer a car when thaey cant even make a safe OS? Or fix it in a timlee manner or just say its an old version buy a new one. A little silly but not far fetched.
Of course i can handle it ya need to think a little harder about that statement. We all have full control of driving our cars. I will more then likely be dead by the time theses "cough" cars will be on the market. And dont forget humans program the cars so they WILL be imperfect. Parts break so they will be imperfect They need the ticket money so they will be banned as well by most states and countys that money will have to be replaced by higher tax's if not banned. Its a lot more involved then just being somewhat safer. Might as well just take public transportation,Trains but the rail system that was removed will have to be taken back and new rails be put up.
Yes it does, now if everyone went by your logic Cough everyone and there cousins will submit junk just to waste FB time. Dont you people think even a little?
"In Germany, Mr Miranda had been staying with US film-maker Laura Poitras, who has also been working on the Snowden files with Mr Greenwald and the Guardian, according to the newspaper."
So we are to beleave a corporation that has lied...numerous times to there customers/stockholders?? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I would be more afraid to use any server service no matter who provides it and especially not trust Google. The do no evil corporation thats got caught lieing more then once.
Does it matter?? Hell ya it matters what ever happens to asking for permission Or asking what people would like? I think its very fair that they have advertising on web sites but not advertising that flashes blinks takes focus. just normal text advertising. Commercials on TV dont take focus away from the program running do they? Follow me on there site sure thats fair but once i leave that cuts the bind i owe them nothing but yet they continue so i use ad blockers, cookie removers, clean out the Internet folder after every close thats what ya get for being dishonest and taking too much.
Its about choice man, its about choice not the right stink in ads and if they did there jobs correctly and didn't depend on spying and ad networks the web site that has focused content gets ads that relate to the sites content man oh man are people just blind now a days.
The same gloom and doom story the Telemarketers gave us. Advertisers dont beleave in the word choice which Mozilla is going to give people now will the Advertisers do as the web user wants thats the real question or will they play god and ignore out wants?
Na i like the idea of calling the elected reps or public meeting where they cant hide. Its a far better way to get them to know we mean business. Mass emailing are ok but not near as personal as a phone call. Oh and the SS would surely be at the meeting as well as the FBI and the NSA and the CIA they might think we are the enemies.
They start getting tons of calls to their offices they will take notice. Dont send mass copies of emails, Call them, leave a message Privacy must be #1. no one spys on anyone to make a profit.
Who said it will be easy? The hardest part it getting alot more people involved alot more. And BTW this is the people who we are asking to help us Major Media. Keep what we are doing focused, Privacy nothing more.
No WE must Fight. Go to public meeting when the ELECTED Congressmen/women who write these laws. Question then send a clear message change it or be removed from office. The reason it has gotten so bad is not because big company's dont fight it its because we the electors choose to ignore it. I'm guilty as well but i do vote. Hound the bastards they dont want to get voted out of office the perks are great. Stop blaming others blame ourselves.
I think to make the point to theses money mongers is to hire a detective to follow them outside and write down little notes and make it so theres no confusion they are being followed and tracked for what they are doing. We dont tell the detective who it is they are following just need a picture of them And there home address i wounder just how they might feel. Advertisers its NOT ok to spy on people without permission or we will start to follow you.:}
I'm not upset at anything at all, I think Copyright as it is is just fine no need to change anything. If your so educated then you know just why i say rubbish . And i dont steal/break laws so i dont need a lawyer whats he going to do anyways tell me make a deal or
Isn't that what you lawyers use in courts destroy all witnesses? sure he was a smart person but he was a slave owner so anything he says is biased towards ownership.Balms and oitments? hmm didn't know that.
And i dont upload my stuff so i dont have to worries about it being stolen.
I pledge allegiance to the Flag
of the United States of America,
and to the Republic for which it stands:
one Nation under God, indivisible,
With Liberty and Justice for all.. .....who can afford it.
Since your a lawyer then you know the reason it is only sometimes enforced or even pursued Justice is not Free in the USA. Some justice costs more then others depending on the lawyer or depending on how much money can be taken by said lawyer. Thomas Jefferson was a salve owner, hardly worthy of being quoted in this century as far as anything related to ownership. Your land argument is again Rubbish.
The only people who can afford Copyright protection in the whole world is people with enough money to protect it.
First learn what Copyright is because what you have said is...Pure rubbish
Property law....Rubbish
You are free to do as you want but remember dont cry when the cops lock your ass up and take your freedom away because you feel you got some god give right to take things that dont belong to you without permission or pay.
Slashdot Mirror
Are there software bugs in any software Google is in control of yes or no answer you have no argument. Software is always tested now and there are bugs you have no argument. All it will take is 1 accident, 1 and Google car will be sued into oblivion.
I turn the key the car starts, i press the gas peddle the car moves, i turn the steering wheel the car turns,i step on the break the car stops. Want to rethink your poor statement?
http://listverse.com/2007/12/04/top-10-worst-engineering-disasters/
Thats just the 10 worst it proves my point so no engineering can truly be trusted..none
well spelling isn't going to kill me im 57 so thats my proof.
And and breathing,walking, eating, drinking, kills us slowly too.
Engineering is done by humans as as the thousands of poorly engineered building,bridges, cars, planes,trains, consumer products killing thousands/millions have shown us is that engineering is no guarantee of safety. So why should i trust Google to engeneer a car when thaey cant even make a safe OS? Or fix it in a timlee manner or just say its an old version buy a new one. A little silly but not far fetched.
Of course i can handle it ya need to think a little harder about that statement. We all have full control of driving our cars. I will more then likely be dead by the time theses "cough" cars will be on the market. And dont forget humans program the cars so they WILL be imperfect. Parts break so they will be imperfect They need the ticket money so they will be banned as well by most states and countys that money will have to be replaced by higher tax's if not banned. Its a lot more involved then just being somewhat safer. Might as well just take public transportation,Trains but the rail system that was removed will have to be taken back and new rails be put up.
I personally wouldn't trust any auto driven care made by anyone. Its all about control baby and i want full control.
Shit happens, details at 6
Ya blame FB for people not reading the rules. Hes smart enough to figure out a flaw but stupid enough not to read the submitting rules ya......
Yes it does, now if everyone went by your logic Cough everyone and there cousins will submit junk just to waste FB time. Dont you people think even a little?
"In Germany, Mr Miranda had been staying with US film-maker Laura Poitras, who has also been working on the Snowden files with Mr Greenwald and the Guardian, according to the newspaper."
So we are to beleave a corporation that has lied...numerous times to there customers/stockholders?? HAHAHAHAHHAHAHA I would be more afraid to use any server service no matter who provides it and especially not trust Google. The do no evil corporation thats got caught lieing more then once.
Does it matter?? Hell ya it matters what ever happens to asking for permission Or asking what people would like? I think its very fair that they have advertising on web sites but not advertising that flashes blinks takes focus. just normal text advertising. Commercials on TV dont take focus away from the program running do they? Follow me on there site sure thats fair but once i leave that cuts the bind i owe them nothing but yet they continue so i use ad blockers, cookie removers, clean out the Internet folder after every close thats what ya get for being dishonest and taking too much.
Windows is already great for gaming in fact better then great so what are they really trying to do?
Its about choice man, its about choice not the right stink in ads and if they did there jobs correctly and didn't depend on spying and ad networks the web site that has focused content gets ads that relate to the sites content man oh man are people just blind now a days.
The same gloom and doom story the Telemarketers gave us. Advertisers dont beleave in the word choice which Mozilla is going to give people now will the Advertisers do as the web user wants thats the real question or will they play god and ignore out wants?
Na i like the idea of calling the elected reps or public meeting where they cant hide. Its a far better way to get them to know we mean business. Mass emailing are ok but not near as personal as a phone call. Oh and the SS would surely be at the meeting as well as the FBI and the NSA and the CIA they might think we are the enemies.
They start getting tons of calls to their offices they will take notice. Dont send mass copies of emails, Call them, leave a message Privacy must be #1. no one spys on anyone to make a profit.
Who said it will be easy? The hardest part it getting alot more people involved alot more. And BTW this is the people who we are asking to help us Major Media. Keep what we are doing focused, Privacy nothing more.
No WE must Fight. Go to public meeting when the ELECTED Congressmen/women who write these laws. Question then send a clear message change it or be removed from office. The reason it has gotten so bad is not because big company's dont fight it its because we the electors choose to ignore it. I'm guilty as well but i do vote. Hound the bastards they dont want to get voted out of office the perks are great. Stop blaming others blame ourselves.
I think to make the point to theses money mongers is to hire a detective to follow them outside and write down little notes and make it so theres no confusion they are being followed and tracked for what they are doing. We dont tell the detective who it is they are following just need a picture of them And there home address i wounder just how they might feel. Advertisers its NOT ok to spy on people without permission or we will start to follow you. :}
I'm not upset at anything at all, I think Copyright as it is is just fine no need to change anything. If your so educated then you know just why i say rubbish . And i dont steal/break laws so i dont need a lawyer whats he going to do anyways tell me make a deal or
....who can afford it.
Isn't that what you lawyers use in courts destroy all witnesses? sure he was a smart person but he was a slave owner so anything he says is biased towards ownership.Balms and oitments? hmm didn't know that.
And i dont upload my stuff so i dont have to worries about it being stolen.
I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, With Liberty and Justice for all..
.
Since your a lawyer then you know the reason it is only sometimes enforced or even pursued Justice is not Free in the USA. Some justice costs more then others depending on the lawyer or depending on how much money can be taken by said lawyer. Thomas Jefferson was a salve owner, hardly worthy of being quoted in this century as far as anything related to ownership. Your land argument is again Rubbish. The only people who can afford Copyright protection in the whole world is people with enough money to protect it.
First learn what Copyright is because what you have said is...Pure rubbish
Property law....Rubbish
You are free to do as you want but remember dont cry when the cops lock your ass up and take your freedom away because you feel you got some god give right to take things that dont belong to you without permission or pay.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Copyright