I think DEC management was too focused on what they had done in the past. Microprocessors were fairly new, and I don't think management had a clue as to how quickly they would advance in processing power. They were using medium scale integration with multiple big boards making up the processor.
Management just couldn't grasp the idea of a computer that would be affordable to a single person. Computers had always been expensive, $50,000 or more machines.
(and $50,000 was for something like a 16 bit machine with 256K memory and 10-20Mb disk
space, low end in that time)
It wasn't a problem with the hardware being slow, it was a problem with DEC missing the market. They were building top end machines when their company was built on selling midsized machines for manufacturing, scientific, and midsized businesses. That market went to the x86 and clones. The high end market didn't have the volume that DEC needed.
DEC got squeezed out. Lack of vision on the part of DEC management is what killed the company. The company had the talent to build a microprocessor based system which could have hit the market before the IBM PC and with a much superior operating system, but the top management blew off the idea. DEC could have been the leader instead of a wanna-be in the personal computer market.
Being that I today read an article about the new Itanium chip being released, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. They want the chip to sell well, so this is a marketing ploy to convince potential customers they'll stand behind the chip for years to come. Customers won't buy this thing if they see it as a dead end. Then they'ld have the expense of switching to another platform just a few years down the road.
That bit about it being great for compiler researchers was a bit of sarcasm. Meaning, the performance of the the itanium isn't all it was hyped up to be because the compilers aren't able to find enough parallelism in the code to keep all six instruction pipelines busy.
Actually, it may be easier develop more efficient compilers(for the itanium) for the higher level languages than it would be for 'C'. Might be, I don't develop compilers.
It was hoped, that compilers could take a 'big picture' view of what the program was doing and then compile efficient code based on a global perspective. At any time, the processor has only a limited scope of what's going on and would not be able to do as good a job in instruction scheduling.
Paraffin in the U.S. is a type of wax used to seal jelly in home canning.
Here, one would not be able to soak a rag in paraffin without heating the paraffin
so that it melted.
For certain few people, yes. It's faster, but considerably more costly (at present).
It's great for people doing advanced research on compiler technology.
For example some cling to the idea that change happens over time. Others think changes in structure and form occur more quickly.
Both are correct. Genetic mutation can occur that causes a small small advantage
for the individual. This occurs from parent to an offspring, quick change. But it can take a long time for this gene to propagate to the entire population.
The fact is that evolution flies in the face of the second law of thermodynamics..
Actually, it's the second law of thermodynamics that supports evolution.
Well possibly not quite, but it's very similar.
The random mutations to the genome that allow evolution to happen are a
consequence of the second law of thermodynamics. These random variations
give certain individuals in the population an increased or decreased probability
of the individuals survival. Over time the genome of the entire population drifts towards the genes that provide an increased chance of survival.
Seriously, they quaranteened the astronauts after they came back from the moon trips for fear of microbial contamination. Wouldn't it be just as likely for some bad-ass microbe to exist in one of these frozen million-year-old ice samples?
MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL on the PRICE - AMD is slowly giving up the most important weapon they had against Intel and without some cuts on price for the X2 line AMD might seriously loose market share to Intel in 2006 !!!
From what I've read, AMD is selling all the chips they can produce. Lowering the prices would just reduce their revenue. When their new Fab comes fully on line the supply side of the equation will change and it's likely prices will fall somewhat. That or if Intel lowers their prices.
SOI reduces capacitances on the chip and allows the chip to run faster as the transisters then don't need to source/sink as much charge to drive outputs to the proper voltage levels. I'm not sure just how much faster, but it is a significant amount.
In some states, a student is not required to attend the public schools in their own district, but can also elect to attend at a school in a neighboring district. Vouchers aren't the only way to provide an incentive for schools to be concerned with quality.
The reporting may have been flawed, but the fact remains that the public education system in America is far from being all it could be. Given the technology available today, some of the basic tenents of the system should be re-considered. Stossel pointed out a flaw that exists in some states whereby schools have little incentive to improve the quality of education they provide. His point that giving the schools more money doesn't solve the problem is supported by various studies.
Stossel's report laid the blame totally on the school system. This is far from the
truth and shows just how biased the segment was. Studies also show that a supporting home environment is necessary for a child's success at school. That environment is lacking in many inner city neighborhoods. Parents cannot shun their responsibilies in providing their children with a good education.
I'll agree with you. And the one they found difficult, (the rotating notes) they probably mentally flipped the object over, making it the same as the other six, hence the diffficulty in realizing it was any different than any of the others. Now if they'd shown a variety of the 'note' objects, with one side colored blue, the other side colored red, and one of them had the colors on the two sides reversed, I'm sure that more of them would have recognized the one out of the ordinary.
F = GMMe/R^2 = Ma and by dividing through by M, GMe/R^2 = a,
The mass of the object falls out, hence
the acceleration is the same, no matter what the mass of the object. So at first
glance it would appear that you were wrong.
BUT.... The earth also accelerates
towards the object. And since the mass of the apple is greater than the mass of
the feather. The earth's acceleration is GREATER for the apple than for the feather, hence
the apple and the earth collide infinitesimally quicker than the feather and the earth. You are indeed correct.
Re:Don't suppose the No Nukes freaks will apologiz
on
Pluto Probe Launches
·
· Score: 1
Yeah. What do you suppose we ought to do about that big nuclear source that's sitting just 93,000,000 miles away?. It's just sitting there spewing out all kinds of nasty, high energy particles. Lots of harmful radiation as well.
It will be travelling 47,000 mph after getting a boost from Jupiter. That's like nearly 800 miles per minute, about 13 miles per second. Better not be any astronauts in its path, if it it one, they'd be an astro-naught.
Slashdot Mirror
Management just couldn't grasp the idea of a computer that would be affordable to a single person. Computers had always been expensive, $50,000 or more machines. (and $50,000 was for something like a 16 bit machine with 256K memory and 10-20Mb disk space, low end in that time)
It wasn't a problem with the hardware being slow, it was a problem with DEC missing the market. They were building top end machines when their company was built on selling midsized machines for manufacturing, scientific, and midsized businesses. That market went to the x86 and clones. The high end market didn't have the volume that DEC needed. DEC got squeezed out. Lack of vision on the part of DEC management is what killed the company. The company had the talent to build a microprocessor based system which could have hit the market before the IBM PC and with a much superior operating system, but the top management blew off the idea. DEC could have been the leader instead of a wanna-be in the personal computer market.
Being that I today read an article about the new Itanium chip being released, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. They want the chip to sell well, so this is a marketing ploy to convince potential customers they'll stand behind the chip for years to come. Customers won't buy this thing if they see it as a dead end. Then they'ld have the expense of switching to another platform just a few years down the road.
Actually, it may be easier develop more efficient compilers(for the itanium) for the higher level languages than it would be for 'C'. Might be, I don't develop compilers.
It was hoped, that compilers could take a 'big picture' view of what the program was doing and then compile efficient code based on a global perspective. At any time, the processor has only a limited scope of what's going on and would not be able to do as good a job in instruction scheduling.
Paraffin in the U.S. is a type of wax used to seal jelly in home canning. Here, one would not be able to soak a rag in paraffin without heating the paraffin so that it melted.
For certain few people, yes. It's faster, but considerably more costly (at present). It's great for people doing advanced research on compiler technology.
Both are correct. Genetic mutation can occur that causes a small small advantage for the individual. This occurs from parent to an offspring, quick change. But it can take a long time for this gene to propagate to the entire population.
You forgot to mention that he roundhouse kicks the others to beyond the Kuiper belt.
Actually, it's the second law of thermodynamics that supports evolution. Well possibly not quite, but it's very similar.
The random mutations to the genome that allow evolution to happen are a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics. These random variations give certain individuals in the population an increased or decreased probability of the individuals survival. Over time the genome of the entire population drifts towards the genes that provide an increased chance of survival.
To those that modded you insightful or interesting... Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Ha Ha Ha Ha! Ha Ha Ha Ha! What idiots!
Seriously, they quaranteened the astronauts after they came back from the moon trips for fear of microbial contamination. Wouldn't it be just as likely for some bad-ass microbe to exist in one of these frozen million-year-old ice samples?
Flash was stillborn on my machine.
But "revolting" and "revolted" are. We revolted the CPU to 1.05 Volts.
From what I've read, AMD is selling all the chips they can produce. Lowering the prices would just reduce their revenue. When their new Fab comes fully on line the supply side of the equation will change and it's likely prices will fall somewhat. That or if Intel lowers their prices.
SOI reduces capacitances on the chip and allows the chip to run faster as the transisters then don't need to source/sink as much charge to drive outputs to the proper voltage levels. I'm not sure just how much faster, but it is a significant amount.
In some states, a student is not required to attend the public schools in their own district, but can also elect to attend at a school in a neighboring district. Vouchers aren't the only way to provide an incentive for schools to be concerned with quality.
Stossel's report laid the blame totally on the school system. This is far from the truth and shows just how biased the segment was. Studies also show that a supporting home environment is necessary for a child's success at school. That environment is lacking in many inner city neighborhoods. Parents cannot shun their responsibilies in providing their children with a good education.
teachers aren't allowed to use the ruler.
Your boss probably would have tested to be among the illiterates.
I'll agree with you. And the one they found difficult, (the rotating notes) they probably mentally flipped the object over, making it the same as the other six, hence the diffficulty in realizing it was any different than any of the others. Now if they'd shown a variety of the 'note' objects, with one side colored blue, the other side colored red, and one of them had the colors on the two sides reversed, I'm sure that more of them would have recognized the one out of the ordinary.
Yes, AMD does use SOI technology in their recent processors, Licensed from IBM.
The mass of the object falls out, hence the acceleration is the same, no matter what the mass of the object. So at first glance it would appear that you were wrong.
BUT.... The earth also accelerates towards the object. And since the mass of the apple is greater than the mass of the feather. The earth's acceleration is GREATER for the apple than for the feather, hence the apple and the earth collide infinitesimally quicker than the feather and the earth. You are indeed correct.
Yeah. What do you suppose we ought to do about that big nuclear source that's sitting just 93,000,000 miles away?. It's just sitting there spewing out all kinds of nasty, high energy particles. Lots of harmful radiation as well.
It will be travelling 47,000 mph after getting a boost from Jupiter. That's like nearly 800 miles per minute, about 13 miles per second. Better not be any astronauts in its path, if it it one, they'd be an astro-naught.
You should have told them, "I'll connect you to one of my subordinates."