No one has cracked ReCAPTCHA yet. (This CAPTCHA had a Slashdot article a few months ago.) As it uses text digitized from old books that the best OCR technology couldn't read, it's continually different and already demonstrated to be unintelligible to machines.
That's actually a fascinating idea, since by it's very existence in the recaptcha system, is non-ocr-able.
And if by some miracle, the spammers come up with a way to OCR it, they will have done a great service for humanity.
I've seen e-mail setups where after the mail is sent to the servers in MX records it goes through several MTAs until it's finally delivered. In order to be possible to reject the e-mail at SMTP time, you'd have to do some kind of synchronization between the MTAs so that the MX server could know whether the addresses exist. Plus, the same domain could read users from several databases at the same time (e.g. mysql,/etc/passwd, LDAP,...) which would complicate synchronization even more
It's never "impossible" to verify recipients.
All it requires is exporting a list of valid email addresses from all the destination systems to the gateway SMTP server. It's not rocket science. And if a system can't export it's userlist, then you don't relay mail for it.
I try not to be a hypocrite, so I don't block ads. If a website has horribly obtrusive ads, I simply stop visiting it, but I have pretty high tolerance for it now. I either tune them out or just deal with it, because the comparatively minor inconvenience is often well worth the benefit of having free access to content/services.
I block all the ads I can find. In fact, I even setup ad-blocking proxy servers for employers so employees don't waste bandwidth or work time on ads.
Know what? If a website disappeared because there was no ad money, another free non-ad supported site would pop up almost overnight. And the internet would be a better place
Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, the web was mostly clean and there was very little advertising (and no high-bandwith graphics or flash either). It was better back then. Happily, thanks to proxy servers, adblock and Firefox, my internet is still like that.
In fact, every now and then I have to use a non-protected computer and my first impression is generally "how to I turn off this game?" or "what the hell is your computer infected with?" People have become desensitized to having their eyes taken over by the advertisers.
Seen the average EULA lately? I read them - I have to, I'm the IT manager - and I'd estimate that about 60% of the time it's clear whether or not we're covered by purchasing a particular product and using it in a particular way, 20% of the time it's not entirely clear but we're probably OK and 20% of the time I have no freaking idea. Not every piece of software has a license as clear-cut as "One copy per PC".
I worked for a bank in the 90's and their compliance policy was that "Every single PC needed to have a box and manual for everything on it". If it didn't they would fire the employee.
It always stuck me as inefficient and expensive, but now that I think about it, compared to the cost of having a person validate everything, or getting caught with your pants down, it was a bargain.
They didn't do site licenses, license packs or anything else. If your machine had MS Office, you had better have a box in your desk that says "Microsoft Office" on it.
If it didn't come as "1 copy per box", they generally wouldn't buy it.
Instead of a new language, try a new point of view and a new way of approaching problems.
It doesn't really matter if you program in PHP or Java or APL, what matters is how you think about problems.
For example, some very data-intensive applications are better served using in-memory hash tables and low level file I/O than a general purpose disk-based database, however programmers have been trained that data = DBMS.
A properly chosen algorithm will beat the pants off of big hardware any day of the week, however programmers are taught to use specific approaches to different classes of problems and don't always produce optimum solutions.
File a complaint with the state Public Utilities Commission.
I did it in Illinois where it can be done online. Miraculously within two weeks I had supervisors from falling all over themselves trying to solve my problem, and what had been broken for months got fixed in a matter of days.
Do you know why? Because if the PUC has too many unresolved complaints, Verizon might not get their next rate increase, so your complaint could be worth millions of dollars if it pushes them over some particular limit.
The point is that I don't live in China. I live in the US. And right here, right now, I couldn't care less if there's some guy sitting in an office in Virginia listening to my phone calls.
If there comes a time when the US government starts acting like China (having people tortured and killed because of their political views), we can take care of it with something called an "election".
If this is what you think, then you have never, ever met an actual "superstar programmer". Superstars live to code. Most would suck at management, and hate it too.
Eventually, "Live to code" wears off, and they discover that it's really nice to have a wife who loves them, maybe a dog or two and possible a kid or two, and that spending time SCUBA diving on small islands with warm sandy beaches beats the crap out of banging on a keyboard or discovering the perfect algorithm.
Then you'll wish you had a whole raft of "really good" programmers that are actually replaceable, so when Mr. Superstar decides that having a life is more enjoyable than coding, you're not out of business.
Since when is Microsoft selling PC's? Or did they send someone around to go put those stickers on the machines?
I'd have thought the hardware manufacturers would be the ones who didn't want sales to fall.
Microsoft have a much better scam than selling new PCs. They get money for each PC manufacturerd, regardless of whether it sells, and they never have to touch the hardware or talk to the consumer.
Any manufacturer would cut off an arm for such a sweet deal.
I still don't know how they are going to make this work. The military is very SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) driven. Can't imagine someone trying to hack by SOP, and if they deviate from the procedure, getting smacked down for it, even if the deviation from procedure is a better method.
Then the approvals, and officers sticking their 2 cents in every second.
Don't see it working well unless they truly allow for a different methodology in this "command"
With a good budget (peanuts by federal standards), managing it would be a piece of cake.
You hire a bunch of really talented hackers, get them whatever hardware and network access they need, wherever they want to live, and keep them happy by letting them do what they really enjoy. Then you just point them in the direction you're likely to want to go, as in:
"At some point we may need to disable or destroy (insert system here). Have fun and try not to break anything important unless you can fix it before it's a problem, and don't get caught.
If you need anything, let me know and I'll get it for you."
You would have talented people lining up at the door.
Many OEM computers come with AV programs out of the box that are only good for several months. My aunt's computer was like this (a Dell). She's not very technical, so she didn't realize that she had to pay to keep something working that came free with her computer. After the "free trial" was up, Norton silently died leaving her computer vulnerable to all sorts of nasties (no firewall, on AOL dialup, yuck). The Norton uninstall program often does not work, leaving many of Nortons "hooks" still installed in the OS.
The problem isn't that Norton expires, the problem is that Norton exists.
The entire concept that an OS that can be corrupted or infected simply receiving data from the outside world (web page, media, packets, etc.), and needs some sort of monthly subscription to "protect it" (it doesn't actually protect it), is completely unacceptable. It's a testament to Microsoft's astonishing mind-control powers that they've managed to get people to accept this as "normal".
I get this all the time:
User: "Which anti-virus program do you use?"
Me: "I don't use an AV program."
User: "Don't you get viruses?"
Me: "No, I use an OS that doesn't give users or their applications permission to infect the system."
User: -> Same look Kirk got on Startrek when he gave an alien computer a logical paradox.
An infectable OS is just a scam to keep the entire Virus->Anti-Virus->Spammer->Microsoft ecosystem alive and healthy. Each has a significant financial incentive for home users to remain vulnerable.
You can't have "servers" and "no servers" at the same time, regardless of what the vendor says.
If the "consolidation" is a done deal, I'd suggest moving to well-behaved web apps hosted at your data center, and making sure that you have Service Level Agreements with the network provider(s) that contain actual, enforceable standards and painful penalties for not meeting them for all the branch office network connections.
It's all money. Some things cost, others save. Consolidating servers saves money, the required SLAs for the now-mandatory reliable, high-performance networking costs money.
Just remember that no matter what you pick, in a few years everybody will tell you that it's crap and you need something else. Since it's inception, the computer industry has gone though several cycles of centralized/decentralized computing and storage, and shifted various percentages of processing, storage and UI back and forth between where the resources are and where the user is.
As long as there's a buck to be made, it will never stop.
If you look at actual business requirements, there is still very little that couldn't be done with a dumb terminal, or with it's friendlier child, the web browser, except make money for the vendors.
I do consulting for a number of mid-size companies that are still using ancient (1980's) technology for core business processes and there's really no compelling business case for them to change. A number of really large businesses still run on an ancient core of COBOL.
If the vendor says "You'll save money", tell them you'll jump right in as soon as they post a performance bond for the full amount. I'll bet you never hear from them again.
Ok...I was guessing this was more of a northeastern type thing. I get the feeling they're really MUCH more hung up on drinking laws up there. You mention having two drinks and driving home up there, and people I talk to get their panties all in a wad.
That's probably because our drunken morons tend to kill and maim people.
A while back, a drunk driver killed the single mother of three teen-age girls, and got off with probation "because he hadn't killed anybody before."
One guy spent the night bar-hopping, then ran his boat completely over a couple of newlyweds and killed them. his excuse was "He didn't want to get a ticket for parking overnight at the public dock".
Another guy did pretty much the same thing on another local lake and killed some more innocent boaters. Yet another was a teenager who killed people with his daddy's Ferrari after drinking and buying beer at a local gas station.
I'd be happy if the drinking age was raised to "I'm no longer an irresponsible moron." and bars made a big public deal that they scan and record IDs from their patrons.
Learn to work well with other humans. There's always another code monkey coming along who will be willing to work harder than you or longer hours than you for less money.
The real job security and money comes from being able to work with the people who handle the money, understand what they're trying to tell you, figure out what it is they actually want, figure out what they actually need, and what would reduce costs, make people happier and make the business more profitable, then deliver it.
Everything else is out-sourcable to the new cheapest labor pool on the planet (wherever that happens to be at the moment).
Also, languages seem to drop in importance by about 10%/year, so after a decade, every language you ever learned will only be moderately useful unless you have a job somewhere that has a big investment in a particular one. However, data structures, algorithms and to a lesser extent SQL are forever.
You guys are obviously morons. My copy of Vista works perfectly.
I picked up a brand new really fast Toshiba with a bunch of RAM, brought it home and it ran like crap, kept crashing and accused me of stealing something or other.
I did a little Googling and learned that the problem was bad drivers. You need to install this set of drivers named "Fedora". I popped in the "Fedora" disk, rebooted, answered a couple of questions (it must be really intelligent, since it didn't even want my Activation Key again), and everything worked great!
Tomorrow, I'm going to call Toshiba and find out why they didn't just ship this "Fedora" update automatically.
Chances are excellent that the code isn't rocket science and anybody of average skill in the language of choice could implement it. In this case, I'd forget I saw it and get on with my life.
If it turns out that the code is some new method for spinning straw into gold, consider it a benefit to humanity and forget you saw it.
No matter what it is, the cat is already out of the bag and any action to retrieve it will turn a relatively anonymous, little used piece of code into a cause that geeks all over the world will rally behind and spread around faster than flu in winter.
In any case, it's not your problem. Any other action besides "ignore" will have effects ranging from getting people fired (including maybe you) to preventing you from getting a decent job in the future because nobody wants to hire a snitch.
Also, since you don't know the origin of the code. It's entirely possible it was not developed internally, and could have come from some other project somewhere else, which opens up an entirely new can of worms for your company, who may discover that one or more critical core system contain infringing code, and that an advisary could easily put them out of business.
Unless you're independently wealthy and don't need a job and don't care what business or lives you ruin, the answer would be "forget it".
The only time I'd change this advice is if you were an outside contractor specifically hired to do a software audit.
Terry
Oct 24 19:21:40 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10319]: Failed password for invalid user staff from 74.86.168.131 port 51218 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:43 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10321]: Failed password for invalid user sales from 74.86.168.131 port 51494 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:46 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10323]: Failed password for invalid user recruit from 74.86.168.131 port 51739 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:49 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10325]: Failed password for invalid user alias from 74.86.168.131 port 51998 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:52 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10328]: Failed password for invalid user office from 74.86.168.131 port 52226 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:53 UtopiaPlanetia denyhosts: Added the following hosts to/etc/hosts.deny - 74.86.168.131 (wdbservers.com)
Oct 24 19:21:55 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10333]: refused connect from::ffff:74.86.168.131 (::ffff:74.86.168.131)
Slashdot Mirror
That's easy.
Tell them that their contract does not include direct access to the database.
Once you give them access to the database, you're screwed. They can easily replicate it and dump you.
They can still dump you if you say "No", however it's more difficult and may not be worth their time or money.
You could also say "Yes" and make it very expensive.
No one has cracked ReCAPTCHA yet. (This CAPTCHA had a Slashdot article a few months ago.) As it uses text digitized from old books that the best OCR technology couldn't read, it's continually different and already demonstrated to be unintelligible to machines.
That's actually a fascinating idea, since by it's very existence in the recaptcha system, is non-ocr-able.
And if by some miracle, the spammers come up with a way to OCR it, they will have done a great service for humanity.
There's pretty much no down-side.
I've seen e-mail setups where after the mail is sent to the servers in MX records it goes through several MTAs until it's finally delivered. In order to be possible to reject the e-mail at SMTP time, you'd have to do some kind of synchronization between the MTAs so that the MX server could know whether the addresses exist. Plus, the same domain could read users from several databases at the same time (e.g. mysql, /etc/passwd, LDAP, ...) which would complicate synchronization even more
It's never "impossible" to verify recipients.
All it requires is exporting a list of valid email addresses from all the destination systems to the gateway SMTP server. It's not rocket science. And if a system can't export it's userlist, then you don't relay mail for it.
The worst dynamic ads used to be the ebay ones on google that would insert whatever query you had.
That drives me crazy on Google.
Best Prices on GetPrivateProfileString Here!
One day when I'm old and bored, I'm going to start clicking on them and demand that they ship me a case of GetPrivateProfileStrings as promised.
I try not to be a hypocrite, so I don't block ads. If a website has horribly obtrusive ads, I simply stop visiting it, but I have pretty high tolerance for it now. I either tune them out or just deal with it, because the comparatively minor inconvenience is often well worth the benefit of having free access to content/services.
I block all the ads I can find. In fact, I even setup ad-blocking proxy servers for employers so employees don't waste bandwidth or work time on ads.
Know what? If a website disappeared because there was no ad money, another free non-ad supported site would pop up almost overnight. And the internet would be a better place
Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, the web was mostly clean and there was very little advertising (and no high-bandwith graphics or flash either). It was better back then. Happily, thanks to proxy servers, adblock and Firefox, my internet is still like that.
In fact, every now and then I have to use a non-protected computer and my first impression is generally "how to I turn off this game?" or "what the hell is your computer infected with?" People have become desensitized to having their eyes taken over by the advertisers.
Reclaim your mind!
Seen the average EULA lately? I read them - I have to, I'm the IT manager - and I'd estimate that about 60% of the time it's clear whether or not we're covered by purchasing a particular product and using it in a particular way, 20% of the time it's not entirely clear but we're probably OK and 20% of the time I have no freaking idea. Not every piece of software has a license as clear-cut as "One copy per PC".
I worked for a bank in the 90's and their compliance policy was that "Every single PC needed to have a box and manual for everything on it". If it didn't they would fire the employee.
It always stuck me as inefficient and expensive, but now that I think about it, compared to the cost of having a person validate everything, or getting caught with your pants down, it was a bargain.
They didn't do site licenses, license packs or anything else. If your machine had MS Office, you had better have a box in your desk that says "Microsoft Office" on it.
If it didn't come as "1 copy per box", they generally wouldn't buy it.
If I wanted my browser "more tightly integrated with the OS", I'd be running Windows and IE.
I smell a Firefox fork coming down the road.
That really takes balls.
So far, I've only uploaded a PD image to play with. It will certainly be my last.
Not that I'm Ansel Adams; I just don't like places that sneak in sleazy contract clauses to take my stuff.
Instead of a new language, try a new point of view and a new way of approaching problems.
It doesn't really matter if you program in PHP or Java or APL, what matters is how you think about problems.
For example, some very data-intensive applications are better served using in-memory hash tables and low level file I/O than a general purpose disk-based database, however programmers have been trained that data = DBMS.
A properly chosen algorithm will beat the pants off of big hardware any day of the week, however programmers are taught to use specific approaches to different classes of problems and don't always produce optimum solutions.
File a complaint with the state Public Utilities Commission.
I did it in Illinois where it can be done online. Miraculously within two weeks I had supervisors from falling all over themselves trying to solve my problem, and what had been broken for months got fixed in a matter of days.
Do you know why? Because if the PUC has too many unresolved complaints, Verizon might not get their next rate increase, so your complaint could be worth millions of dollars if it pushes them over some particular limit.
The point is that I don't live in China. I live in the US. And right here, right now, I couldn't care less if there's some guy sitting in an office in Virginia listening to my phone calls.
If there comes a time when the US government starts acting like China (having people tortured and killed because of their political views), we can take care of it with something called an "election".
And this surprises who?
Don't do evil shit and you won't have to worry.
In fact, if the gov't didn't have this capability, I'd say they weren't doing their job.
If this is what you think, then you have never, ever met an actual "superstar programmer". Superstars live to code. Most would suck at management, and hate it too.
Eventually, "Live to code" wears off, and they discover that it's really nice to have a wife who loves them, maybe a dog or two and possible a kid or two, and that spending time SCUBA diving on small islands with warm sandy beaches beats the crap out of banging on a keyboard or discovering the perfect algorithm.
Then you'll wish you had a whole raft of "really good" programmers that are actually replaceable, so when Mr. Superstar decides that having a life is more enjoyable than coding, you're not out of business.
Since when is Microsoft selling PC's? Or did they send someone around to go put those stickers on the machines? I'd have thought the hardware manufacturers would be the ones who didn't want sales to fall. Microsoft have a much better scam than selling new PCs. They get money for each PC manufacturerd, regardless of whether it sells, and they never have to touch the hardware or talk to the consumer.
Any manufacturer would cut off an arm for such a sweet deal.
I still don't know how they are going to make this work. The military is very SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) driven. Can't imagine someone trying to hack by SOP, and if they deviate from the procedure, getting smacked down for it, even if the deviation from procedure is a better method. Then the approvals, and officers sticking their 2 cents in every second. Don't see it working well unless they truly allow for a different methodology in this "command"
With a good budget (peanuts by federal standards), managing it would be a piece of cake.
You hire a bunch of really talented hackers, get them whatever hardware and network access they need, wherever they want to live, and keep them happy by letting them do what they really enjoy. Then you just point them in the direction you're likely to want to go, as in:
"At some point we may need to disable or destroy (insert system here). Have fun and try not to break anything important unless you can fix it before it's a problem, and don't get caught.
If you need anything, let me know and I'll get it for you."
You would have talented people lining up at the door.
Many OEM computers come with AV programs out of the box that are only good for several months. My aunt's computer was like this (a Dell). She's not very technical, so she didn't realize that she had to pay to keep something working that came free with her computer. After the "free trial" was up, Norton silently died leaving her computer vulnerable to all sorts of nasties (no firewall, on AOL dialup, yuck). The Norton uninstall program often does not work, leaving many of Nortons "hooks" still installed in the OS.
The problem isn't that Norton expires, the problem is that Norton exists.
The entire concept that an OS that can be corrupted or infected simply receiving data from the outside world (web page, media, packets, etc.), and needs some sort of monthly subscription to "protect it" (it doesn't actually protect it), is completely unacceptable. It's a testament to Microsoft's astonishing mind-control powers that they've managed to get people to accept this as "normal".
I get this all the time:
User: "Which anti-virus program do you use?"
Me: "I don't use an AV program."
User: "Don't you get viruses?"
Me: "No, I use an OS that doesn't give users or their applications permission to infect the system."
User: -> Same look Kirk got on Startrek when he gave an alien computer a logical paradox.
An infectable OS is just a scam to keep the entire Virus->Anti-Virus->Spammer->Microsoft ecosystem alive and healthy. Each has a significant financial incentive for home users to remain vulnerable.
Exactly who has local users on a box that's doing anything important?
I'd rather have hemorrhoids than local users. At least when they're on your ass you know where they are and what they're doing.
All I see when I go there is: "Privoxy blocked http://www.snopes.com/common/include/adsdaqsky.asp."
The internet is a beautiful place when you remove all the crap.
If people only knew this was an option there would be riots in the streets.
My email contains no spam and my browser contains no ads. Things don't pop up, under, slide around or tell me to "Punch the monkey". Life is good.
You can't have "servers" and "no servers" at the same time, regardless of what the vendor says.
If the "consolidation" is a done deal, I'd suggest moving to well-behaved web apps hosted at your data center, and making sure that you have Service Level Agreements with the network provider(s) that contain actual, enforceable standards and painful penalties for not meeting them for all the branch office network connections.
It's all money. Some things cost, others save. Consolidating servers saves money, the required SLAs for the now-mandatory reliable, high-performance networking costs money.
Just remember that no matter what you pick, in a few years everybody will tell you that it's crap and you need something else. Since it's inception, the computer industry has gone though several cycles of centralized/decentralized computing and storage, and shifted various percentages of processing, storage and UI back and forth between where the resources are and where the user is.
As long as there's a buck to be made, it will never stop.
If you look at actual business requirements, there is still very little that couldn't be done with a dumb terminal, or with it's friendlier child, the web browser, except make money for the vendors.
I do consulting for a number of mid-size companies that are still using ancient (1980's) technology for core business processes and there's really no compelling business case for them to change. A number of really large businesses still run on an ancient core of COBOL.
If the vendor says "You'll save money", tell them you'll jump right in as soon as they post a performance bond for the full amount. I'll bet you never hear from them again.
Ok...I was guessing this was more of a northeastern type thing. I get the feeling they're really MUCH more hung up on drinking laws up there. You mention having two drinks and driving home up there, and people I talk to get their panties all in a wad.
That's probably because our drunken morons tend to kill and maim people.
A while back, a drunk driver killed the single mother of three teen-age girls, and got off with probation "because he hadn't killed anybody before."
One guy spent the night bar-hopping, then ran his boat completely over a couple of newlyweds and killed them. his excuse was "He didn't want to get a ticket for parking overnight at the public dock".
Another guy did pretty much the same thing on another local lake and killed some more innocent boaters. Yet another was a teenager who killed people with his daddy's Ferrari after drinking and buying beer at a local gas station.
I'd be happy if the drinking age was raised to "I'm no longer an irresponsible moron." and bars made a big public deal that they scan and record IDs from their patrons.
Learn to work well with other humans. There's always another code monkey coming along who will be willing to work harder than you or longer hours than you for less money.
The real job security and money comes from being able to work with the people who handle the money, understand what they're trying to tell you, figure out what it is they actually want, figure out what they actually need, and what would reduce costs, make people happier and make the business more profitable, then deliver it.
Everything else is out-sourcable to the new cheapest labor pool on the planet (wherever that happens to be at the moment).
Also, languages seem to drop in importance by about 10%/year, so after a decade, every language you ever learned will only be moderately useful unless you have a job somewhere that has a big investment in a particular one. However, data structures, algorithms and to a lesser extent SQL are forever.
It would 'let an attacker corrupt Windows' kernel files, making the laptop unbootable
Mine came that way from the factory. I always thought that was the default Windows configuration
In other news, it has been discovered that fire is hot
You guys are obviously morons. My copy of Vista works perfectly.
I picked up a brand new really fast Toshiba with a bunch of RAM, brought it home and it ran like crap, kept crashing and accused me of stealing something or other.
I did a little Googling and learned that the problem was bad drivers. You need to install this set of drivers named "Fedora". I popped in the "Fedora" disk, rebooted, answered a couple of questions (it must be really intelligent, since it didn't even want my Activation Key again), and everything worked great!
Tomorrow, I'm going to call Toshiba and find out why they didn't just ship this "Fedora" update automatically.
Chances are excellent that the code isn't rocket science and anybody of average skill in the language of choice could implement it. In this case, I'd forget I saw it and get on with my life.
If it turns out that the code is some new method for spinning straw into gold, consider it a benefit to humanity and forget you saw it.
No matter what it is, the cat is already out of the bag and any action to retrieve it will turn a relatively anonymous, little used piece of code into a cause that geeks all over the world will rally behind and spread around faster than flu in winter.
In any case, it's not your problem. Any other action besides "ignore" will have effects ranging from getting people fired (including maybe you) to preventing you from getting a decent job in the future because nobody wants to hire a snitch.
Also, since you don't know the origin of the code. It's entirely possible it was not developed internally, and could have come from some other project somewhere else, which opens up an entirely new can of worms for your company, who may discover that one or more critical core system contain infringing code, and that an advisary could easily put them out of business.
Unless you're independently wealthy and don't need a job and don't care what business or lives you ruin, the answer would be "forget it".
The only time I'd change this advice is if you were an outside contractor specifically hired to do a software audit. Terry
Just run DenyHosts
/etc/hosts.deny - 74.86.168.131 (wdbservers.com)
::ffff:74.86.168.131 (::ffff:74.86.168.131)
Oct 24 19:21:40 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10319]: Failed password for invalid user staff from 74.86.168.131 port 51218 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:43 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10321]: Failed password for invalid user sales from 74.86.168.131 port 51494 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:46 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10323]: Failed password for invalid user recruit from 74.86.168.131 port 51739 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:49 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10325]: Failed password for invalid user alias from 74.86.168.131 port 51998 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:52 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10328]: Failed password for invalid user office from 74.86.168.131 port 52226 ssh2
Oct 24 19:21:53 UtopiaPlanetia denyhosts: Added the following hosts to
Oct 24 19:21:55 UtopiaPlanetia sshd[10333]: refused connect from