Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Giving Away Vista Ultimate, With a Catch

Opinari writes "In case you haven't heard, Microsoft is giving away copies of Windows Vista Ultimate (32-bit or 64-bit DVD), Microsoft Office Ultimate 2007, Microsoft Money Plus Premium, Microsoft Student with Encarta Premium 2008, or Microsoft Streets and Trips 2008 — you can choose any one. The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program."

495 comments

  1. Free... by crazyjeremy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Free as in Linux? No, free as in Microsoft!

    1. Re:Free... by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Free as in beer? No, free as in an NSA wiretap!

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    2. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Free as in speech? No, free as in DMCA,RIAA,MPAA,BSA,FBI,NSA,MAFIA,V14GR4,C14L15,...

    3. Re:Free... by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The catch...you have to use Vista..

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in lunch? Yes!

    5. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in Kool-Aid!

    6. Re:Free... by SL+Baur · · Score: 4, Funny
      Free as in Microsoft ...

      What are the system requirements?
      The only requirements are that your home PC is running the Microsoft Windows Vista or Windows XP operating system, and that you have an Internet connection. That's it! I guess I don't qualify :( and I so wanted to dance in the streets burning Linux and Mac OS X cds celebrating my new freedom while I was installing a real OS on my MacBook Pro ...
    7. Re:Free... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 5, Funny

      You sank my battleship.

    8. Re:Free... by Mistlefoot · · Score: 4, Informative

      I didn't read all the details but it does imply XP as well as Vista...

      To quote from the second page towards registration:

      "Choose the program(s) you would like to join
      Automated feedback program (Windows Vista and Windows XP only)"

      and further on in the uninstallation instructions.....

      "Windows XP Instructions:

            1. Click Start, click Control Panel, click Add or Remove Programs, and then click Change or Remove Programs.
            2. Select Windows Feedback Panel, and then click Remove.
      "

    9. Re:Free... by Yeti.SSM · · Score: 1

      I don't qualify either: "Participation is currently limited to US residents of 18 years and older."

      Not that I own a machine that would be capable of running Vista for that matter...

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
    10. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Name: Linux
      Last Name: Rules
      Email: Linus@linuxrules.microsoft.com

      Email me my confirmation biatches!!!

    11. Re:Free... by Barny · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you install your free office 2007 under xp, you will have to worry about xp stuff.

      They are not going to increase XP market share without someone holding a gun to their head ;)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    12. Re:Free... by greenghost77 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding. They better give away a couple gigs of memory along with it.

    13. Re:Free... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That's the feeback program. You can get free Vista but to do so you need to sign up to the feedback program, and that uses some spyware, er, software that needs Vista or XP.

      In makefile terms

      freevista: pc_with_xp_or_vista

      Let's hope that the terrorists are short of money and care about using legitimate software ;-)

      Actually, that reminds me. A reporter in Afghanistan just after the fall of the Taliban bought a looted al Qaeda laptop -
      http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/cullison

      From the sound of, they seem unlikely to grasp the fact that the export version of Windows uses 56 bit keys (which the NSA can presumably crack quickly) rather than 128 bit ones.

      http://www.news.com/2100-1023-204556.html

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re:Free... by name*censored* · · Score: 3, Funny
      without someone holding a gun to their head ;)

      Are you taking volunteers? If so, sign me up!
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    15. Re:Free... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      The sign-up mail:
      2007-12-12 09:53:11 1J2NL0-0007pT-Qi SA: Action: permanently rejected message: score=6.4 required=5.0 trigger=5.0 (scanned in 4/4 secs | Message-Id: EXT-SMTP-02wB1D6nxK0007f39f@ext-smtp-02.partners.extranet.microsoft.com). From <winsurv@microsoft.com> (host=mail4.mssupport.microsoft.com [131.107.70.12]) for winspyware@angband.pl
      2007-12-12 09:53:11 1J2NL0-0007pT-Qi F=winsurv@microsoft.com H=mail4.mssupport.microsoft.com [131.107.70.12] P=esmtp rejected by local_scan(): Rejected


      I guess SpamAssassin knows it better than me... Oh well, now I'll never know whether it works on Wine or not :-(

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    16. Re:Free... by MadJo · · Score: 1

      Wait till you hear what the Cool Software Foundation has to say about this.
      (listen to their interview with Aaron Seigo to know what I'm refering to)

    17. Re:Free... by nibb · · Score: 1

      Free as in "Google"

    18. Re:Free... by nem75 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The catch...you have to use Vista..
      Nah. You could just not use it and let them monitor that.
    19. Re:Free... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and for my next trick, ill make a aircraft carrier vanish...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    20. Re:Free... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1, Funny

      The NSA have got "Wire" on tap? Man, those microbreweries are popping up everywhere!

    21. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually to be more precise:

      Free as in Linux? No, free as in *Google*!

    22. Re:Free... by Barny · · Score: 1

      Well, to be honest, as a computer retailer, this thing had me thinking at first, but reading the fine print (you have to run the spyware on your box for 3 months, then get a free toy) showed some downsides, like americans only, and a complete inability to exploit it for fun and... yeah profit :) (its not a bad word, really)

      And yes, they will be the first against the wall when the revolution starts (apology mr adams).

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    23. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is starting to look like a horror movie. They'll give you the OS for free, so long as you accept to be monitorized by the Dictatorsh- Chur- Magister- Corporation can control what you do. They want to see you happily consuming products from them and other corporations, and of course, they work to the best interest of the mafiaa (who'd think a company that sells products should look for the people who's paying them?).

      defectivebydesign.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    24. Re:Free... by matria · · Score: 1

      Ah, somebody must be using Windows for Warcraft... http://www.windowsforwarships.com/

    25. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You say wiretap
      I say Spinal Tap
      The Sex Farm Woman
      With the really Big Bottom
      Just couldn't put Stonehenge back.

    26. Re:Free... by Glonoinha · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The NSA can 'presumably' crack 56-bit encryption quickly?
      Dude, it's seven bytes. Here is what a seven byte key looks like : ABCDEF - that's it, seven characters. 256 values per character.
      Given sufficient encrypted data and even a smidgen of insight into what some of the data contains (ie, the directory structure on a Windows box generally has a lot of similar files in similar places) I can crack 56-bit on my home system in a few days. Granted my home system is six machines consisting of about 26GHz spread across 11 CPUs sharing 9 Gigs of memory, connected by a GigE backbone, but still - in the bigger scheme of things my system isn't really considered that powerful anymore (and I'm actually considering an upgrade.)

      Yea, NSA cuts through 56-bit crypto like a puppy on a pork-chop.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    27. Re:Free... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, one could view this more overt statement of fascist control as an improvement in the transparency of the dialog.
      Get with the narrative, son: it feels better that way.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    28. Re:Free... by bigdavesmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The catch...you have to use Vista..
      Yeah, I've already given them my feedback by not downloading it. Even for free.
    29. Re:Free... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "They want to see you happily consuming products from them and other corporations, and of course, they work to the best interest of the mafiaa (who'd think a company that sells products should look for the people who's paying them?)."

      EEEK!! They also will be monitoring your porn?!?!?!?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:Free... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      What's to stop someone from fooling the monitoring software into thinking that you never use the OS... hows that for data?

      Personally I want to know where to sign up for this... I'm building a SageTV box and really couldn't care less if they monitor the usage of that thing.

    31. Re:Free... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Well, to be honest, as a computer retailer, this thing had me thinking at first, but reading the fine print (you have to run the spyware on your box for 3 months, then get a free toy)"

      Does it shut down if you never connect it to the internet?

      Not all computers need to be networked, you know....

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:Free... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Free as in Linux? No, free as in Microsoft! We have a new invention in hand. The first Spyware Operating System.

      I would expect anything from MS but this thing really amazed and shocked me. Nothing less. MSFT have really disconnected itself from reality.

      This is a time which average user BUYS a good anti spyware for $30 and swears at their software vendor (can be Adobe even) if any application connects to Internet without their permission even for a innocent thing as update checks.

    33. Re:Free... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I can crack 56-bit on my home system in a few days. Granted my home system is six machines consisting of about 26GHz spread across 11 CPUs sharing 9 Gigs of memory, connected by a GigE backbone, but still - in the bigger scheme of things my system isn't really considered that powerful anymore (and I'm actually considering an upgrade.) Dude, you're a badass hacker. But trying 2^56 combinations still takes time.

      E.g.
      http://www.news.com/Record-set-in-cracking-56-bit-crypto/2100-1017_3-220333.html

      Deep Crack and Distributed.Net's network of nearly 100,000 PCs on the Internet won DES Challenge III in 22 hours and 15 minutes.

      Given sufficient encrypted data and even a smidgen of insight into what some of the data contains (ie, the directory structure on a Windows box generally has a lot of similar files in similar places) Even if you know the plaintext a priori, you still need to do a trial decryption for each of the 2^56 combinations and check if you guessed right. So it would take longer than a few days on your system.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    34. Re:Free... by plague3106 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or you can take the option of just filling out an online survey.. but hey, why stop free bashing?

    35. Re:Free... by peragrin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually I am thinking of installing a copy of windows to play one or two windows only games that i have been eyeing. this would work well. disable it so it can't connect to the Internet afterwards and let thme wonder what is going on.

      Why they ask why can't the monitoring software work I will simply say that I don't let substandard software out on the internet, and go back to my Linux box.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    36. Re:Free... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program.

      I have to actually use the program? Uh, no thanks man, I'm happy with XP and Mandriva (but I was happier with 98 and Mandriva)

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    37. Re:Free... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is starting to look like a horror movie

      Starting? You haven't been using Microsoft products very long, have you?

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    38. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From email auto reply from microsoft

      What happened to the free product option?
      Thank you for your interest in the feedback program. Due to overwhelming response, the supply of gifts has been exhausted so we have closed our free product offer on 12/11/2007 at 2pm Pacific Time. Thanks to everyone that participated!

    39. Re:Free... by Yewbert · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was thinking,.... hmmm, dedicated box to run uTorrent sharing Linux distros,... Sure, let 'em watch.

    40. Re:Free... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Why not just run Linux? Last I checked, SageTV ran fine on Linux.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    41. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and watch you masturbate over your webcam.

      Actually, that'd be the least of my concerns; I'd rather have a public webcam when fapping than Microsoft monitoring anything else I do.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    42. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

      The monitoring software will probably be hardcoded together with the Digital Restrictions Malware (DRM) crap and all the AIDS they've stuffed into Vista; it won't be easy to get rid of it, and I doubt you'll want to have a system without any network interfaces. Careful with anything that can be used to transfer data out of the system, like USB wireless cards. Especially wireless.

      Another possibility would be that the spyware agent is visible, but you'll have to have it enabled in order for Windows to boot and be able to legally use it.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    43. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

      Ha ha ha, true. It's been an horror movie since... as far as I can remember, but it's getting really gory since they started siding with the mafiaa and stuffing digital AIDS (DRM) into everything. Things started to get exponentially worse every year since Windows Media 7.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    44. Re:Free... by MrJack5304 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Illusions hitmark, illusions. Tricks are what whores do for money.

    45. Re:Free... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Even those that are networked, can be left behind a firewall with no access to the internet. It might be nice to use these machines as a little network server. Or possible as a media center box. Put the box behind a firewall, and only give it access to the places it needs to download TV listings, and you should be set.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    46. Re:Free... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1
      I considered it but after looking at the details and weighing the differences there were a few determining factors
      • I already own a SageTV Windows License
      • Some of my hardware is not Linux compatible
      • I have no experience with Linux beyond popping in an Ubuntu Live CD and saying "this is neat"
      The cost of a Linux SageTV License + new compatible hardware is considerably more than a Windows license, and this is a project that needs to be done and working before Christmas since I'll be gifting it. So while I might otherwise use it as a good opportunity to get my feet wet with Linux I don't have the luxury of time to learn the ropes.
    47. Re:Free... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You're probably better off just picking up an OEM copy of windows XP home if all you want to do is run a SageTV box. It will suck less resources than Vista, and will cost less.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    48. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing, like we needed to know.

    49. Re:Free... by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they've recorded you as not having downloaded it. Either way, you've been accounted.

    50. Re:Free... by michrech · · Score: 4, Informative
      You didn't read the page very well. You don't *have* to run the spyware. It's an option. Using it, according to the site, will possibly shrink the amount of surveys (that you can skip, "if you don't have the time") that you will be asked to fill out.

      Right here shows what must be done. You can sign up for either, or both, of the programs (for those to lazy to read the page, the two programs available are the "spyware" and the surveys -- I opted just for the surveys).

      Here is the text about the survey feedback program:

      When you join the survey feedback program, you'll be invited to take a survey on a regular schedule. If the survey arrives at a time where you are busy, you can skip that one and take the next one instead. You will not receive more than one survey every two weeks.

      Hell, I signed up for it. I have access to a computer I can install it on for 3 months that can just sit in a corner idle (whether I decide to use the "feedback program" or not).

      Well, to be honest, as a computer retailer, this thing had me thinking at first, but reading the fine print (you have to run the spyware on your box for 3 months, then get a free toy) showed some downsides, like americans only, and a complete inability to exploit it for fun and... yeah profit :) (its not a bad word, really)

      And yes, they will be the first against the wall when the revolution starts (apology mr adams).
      --
      bork bork bork!
    51. Re:Free... by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Yup, if you install your free office 2007 under xp, you will have to worry about xp stuff.

      You'd have more problems than that--Office 2007 doesn't work under XP! ;-)

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    52. Re:Free... by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      It's interesting that my wife, who is not that much of a techie, asked as her first question, "Will they monitor my habits and get me in trouble when I make backups of my music CDs?"

    53. Re:Free... by encoderer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow. That was a stunningly bad joke.

    54. Re:Free... by badran · · Score: 0

      Let me correct that...
      You sank my battleshit...

    55. Re:Free... by encoderer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You mean it will "suck fewer resources," right?

      Cause let's be real.. it's Vista.. it certainly won't suck less...

    56. Re:Free... by Pentavirate · · Score: 1

      I'm glad somebody finally said it.

    57. Re:Free... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > I have no experience with Linux beyond popping in an Ubuntu Live CD and saying "this is neat"

              Don't sell yourself short. Given this, you might be able to get MythTV
      running all by yourself and not need to worry about the fact that your SageTV
      license is only for Windows (that's a bit lame).

              The HW issues are really the only thing slowing you down at this point.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    58. Re:Free... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I already had a "free" copy of Vista that I've erased...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    59. Re:Free... by iroll · · Score: 1

      Or they just type in their super secret NSA password (usr: NSA, pwd: backdoorhaxlol) and your computer just gives 'em up willingly.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    60. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's weird...I'm using Word and Excel from Office 2007 right now on XP. What's even more weird is that my entire company uses Office 2007 on XP. It must be magic.

    61. Re:Free... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Deep Crack and Distributed.Net's network of nearly 100,000 PCs on the Internet won DES Challenge III in 22 hours and 15 minutes. ...in 1999, when the Pentium 200MHz was king. Today you could do the same with a garage full of Playstation 3s and some secondhand network hardware.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    62. Re:Free... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      I looked into MythTV as well, it certainly a great system and I wouldn't mind it for myself though I think the level of expertise required to use and configure it are above that of the person I'm giving this to. SageTV on the other hand is comparable to TiVo in terms of ease of use.

      As for Linux in general...
      I've already made my new-years resolution to get Ubuntu up and running on one of my laptops, and I've made the decision to go XP to Linux as my upgrade path for my other computers... over the last year or so I've been slowly weening myself off of Windows exclusive apps so when I'm ready to ditch XP I wont have to learn a whole suite of new applications as well. At this point the only non Linux apps I still use are Photoshop and Premiere... and while I'm anxious to try Cinelara for video editing, the GIMP is a rather weak replacement for Photoshop IMO. I've also got a Zune (I only bought it recently, and only because it was dirt cheap) so I'll need to figure out how I can use that with Linux as well since in it's stock configuration it seems mostly useless without the accompanying windows app to feed it files and settings.

    63. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Vista Ultimate gives away Microsoft!

    64. Re:Free... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      yeah I was actually planning on going XP Home... but I figured
      Free Vista > $$$ XP Home

    65. Re:Free... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I messed around with MythTV a long time before trying and settling on SageTV. The set up of MythTV is just too difficult. You should not have to have a MySQL database to tape TV shows. Or if you do, there should be a single script that your run, which configures the entire database, just supplying the username and password for the database. There's also quite a bit of other stuff to set up. TV Listings now have to be paid for, and getting your TV tuner, even a "supported" one, working in Linux can be quite time consuming. With SageTV I was up and running withing 30 minutes. Everything just worked. MythTV is good if you want to set up a PVR as a hobby, but if you just want a working PVR, and couldn't care less about the fun in setting it up, then SageTV is probably the better choice.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    66. Re:Free... by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      free windows to play games on, perfect. The only reason I wanted to try vista was for games. Microsoft monitors my game only computer. They see I play and that is it. No email, no web surfing, nothing else. Maybe microsoft will see that people only play games with their shiny new os.

    67. Re:Free... by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      They can ship me all the software they want, and monitor it all they want. As long as they can monitor it while it's sitting in a box in the closet. (despite my contempt for Vista, it never hurts to have spare valid CD keys once this program flops)

    68. Re:Free... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      A Core2 Duo has two processors running at say 3Ghz. Let's say it's 30 times faster than a P200.

      So you'd still need 100,000 / 30 = 3000 PCs running for 22 hours. Even if a modern machine were 300 times faster than a P200 which it isn't, it would still take 300 PCs 22 hours.

      Now 3000 PCs running for 22 hours is problem if you're the NSA (and they could probably have do it cheaper and in a much smaller space with FPGAs or ASICs), but the grand parent can't crack it in a few days on his 9 machines.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    69. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 0

      I thought I was going to be modded Insightful for sharing that.

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    70. Re:Free... by Abalamahalamatandra · · Score: 1

      Uh...what? You're mistaken.

      It works as well as O2K7 ever works, on XP. I use it every day, sadly.

    71. Re:Free... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Actually, that'd be the least of my concerns; I'd rather have a public webcam when fapping than Microsoft monitoring anything else I do."

      Hmm, new word for the day: fapping.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    72. Re:Free... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...

      A single script that installs mysql, sets up the database and set the username and password.

      That sounds suspicously like the Debian/Ubuntu installation procedure.

      Get one of the recommended tuners and the "hardware integration difficulties" will not be a problem.

      It's not like anyone is keeping secrets about this stuff. All you
      have to do is ask/search and you will get a very detailed shopping
      list.

      What MythTV has is lots of options. Unless Sage can somehow magically
      guesses the right (for you) options out of the obvious possibilities
      then it can only go far in reducing the complexity of the situation.

      Even a genuine Tivo has problems in this area. ...but the bottom line is that MythTV has gotten MUCH easier
      to install in the last 12 months due to some of the hardware
      support becoming more mature and Ubuntu MythTV packages being
      available.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    73. Re:Free... by Knara · · Score: 1

      That's a new word to you? Is this your first time logging onto the Internet since 2000?

    74. Re:Free... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      It's been over a year since I've settled on SageTV. So maybe things have changed. The difference is, with SageTV, I didn't have to search, I didn't have to ask, It just worked. Why can't MythTV be more like VMWare, OpenOffice, Firefox, and many other Linux Programs where I can download it and run it, without having to do a million things and make a research project out of just trying to get the application working. If you want your PVR to be working in half an hour, use SageTV. It you want it to be infinitely configurable, and have the set-up process be a research project, then use MythTV.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    75. Re:Free... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Considering all the steroids on animal farms, it could be QUITE hairy:

      1: her
      2: she could out power(fill in your blanks)you...

      When you pass out from fleeing her, you'll endure the Heimlich maneu(ve)r...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    76. Re:Free... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      "Digital AIDS", I like that. Now I have to thnk of what "AIDS" stands for in this context (not, of course, "Anal Intercourse Death Syndrome")

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    77. Re:Free... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Since the word is new to you, I shall demonstrate a popular use:

      FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP

      Oh, and the lameness filter can suck up the spunk when I'm done.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    78. Re:Free... by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Supposedly Photoshop CS2 works well under Wine 0.9.46 or later. I usually add the WineHQ repos under Ubuntu, so I get updates from them instead of waiting for Canonical to repackage it. You should also try Krita, the KOffice image editor. Also be sure to give Gimp 2.4 a try, there have been many improvements over 2.2.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    79. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't. I use Linux and Mac OS X. :)

    80. Re:Free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read parent's post, I think that was the point.

    81. Re:Free... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Didn't know there were warships in Azeroth...

    82. Re:Free... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So what happens if I get the free Vista but then don't install it? Yes, Microsoft can monitor everything I do, as soon as I bother with the hassle of taking the shrink wrap off.

      Or I can use Vista solely to run XP in a virtual machine.
      (http://www.intelliadmin.com/blog/2006/12/vmware-releases-vista-compatible-beta.html)

    83. Re:Free... by fonik · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but anal sex accounts for only 0.6% of AIDS transmission.

    84. Re:Free... by Barny · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, I read all I could right upto the part where I had to digitally sign that I was 18 years+ and a US citizen... thats when I closed the site :)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    85. Re:Free... by penguin_dance · · Score: 1

      Huh...I had heard that 2007 would only work on Vista and Office 2003 was the only one that would work on both Vista and XP. I stand corrected.

      --
      If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
    86. Re:Free... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "That's a new word to you? Is this your first time logging onto the Internet since 2000?"

      No....I've been on the internet since roughly about '92-'93 I think, and honestly, never heard the term before. I've not seen it on the internet, and it certainly isn't used where I live in common language.

      I've heard a plethora of euphemisms for the act, but, this is a new one on me. Hey, you learn something new every day!!

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    87. Re:Free... by Knara · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the term can reasonably be traced to a first use in the now-defunct Sexy Losers webcomic.

    88. Re:Free... by lpcustom · · Score: 1

      [quote]You'd have more problems than that--Office 2007 doesn't work under XP! ;-) [/quote] I wish that was true.....

      --
      Beer! It's what's for breakfast!
    89. Re:Free... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Like I said before... the current version of Ubuntu does that.

      MythTV itself has never been a very complex thing to get installed.
      If you needed to even be aware of the database then you were making
      the problem unecessarily difficult for yourself. Civilized package
      managers eliminate that problem.

      Hardware support has been a problem in the past and that's something
      that recent Linux distro releases have addressed very well.

      If you want to install a complex piece of software with potentially
      inappropriate defaults then you can already do that with MythTV.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    90. Re:Free... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Or you just have a ridiculously misconfigured SA install. I know PEOPLE that can achieve scores of more than 5 with manually composed emails! Change to at least 7!

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    91. Re:Free... by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1

      YHBT

      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    92. Re:Free... by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      That's why I was thinking Playstation 3s instead of PCs. Instead of 2 x86 cores, you get 7 SPEs and 1 PPE clocked at 3.2GHz per unit. 750 consoles (or better, racks holding 750 PS3 logic boards) would fit in a basement or 2-car garage. It wouldn't fit an amateur's budget, though.

      The real trick would be getting the power company to connect the necessary 2,000 amp service to your house...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    93. Re:Free... by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      But it's a damned funny acronym though.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    94. Re:Free... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      How can it be spyware if you know it's on your system and you have agreed that it reports back?

      This would be different if Microsoft installed the software without your knowledge or approval.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Which is the catch? by amccaf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program.
    Wait, which is the catch: the fact that they will monitor your use, or the implication that you'll be using it?
    --
    "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
    1. Re:Which is the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      I'm a microsoft/windows fanboy and I completely disagree with your viewpoint about windows sucking, but i'll freely admit that I laughed after reading your comment. Congrats.

    2. Re:Which is the catch? by yoyhed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, you have to at least admit that XP is still much better than Vista.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    3. Re:Which is the catch? by mrbluze · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to at least admit that XP is still much better than Vista.

      True. It's much easier to get for 'free' and chances are all kinds of people will be monitoring you, not just M$. ;)

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    4. Re:Which is the catch? by jkrise · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program.

      This gives the false impression that Microsoft somehow does not monitor the use of Vista for non-participants! Every single Vista user is monitored... actually every single Windows user AND Office user is continuously monitored for Genuine Disadvantage from Windows 2000 onwards, if not earlier.

      Will Microsoft add these freeloaders / testers while reporting Vista sales? Why not simply admit failure; accept that Vista was a crappy effort; and actually write a new OS capable of running on existing hardware; and existing software apps? The entire PC ecosystem has been broken by Vista; and the customer (even clueless home users) has revolted; taking his business elsewhere (Apple / Linux) and ditching Windows altogether.

      Everybody from the hardware OEMs to software developers has lost out because of Vista... so they're going cross-platform (Java) or Linux (the EEE PC from Asus). If Microsoft does not abandon Vista immediately and cut its losses; pretty soon it will have to abandon Windows AND Office entirely.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    5. Re:Which is the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No... I used XP for 5 years and now I have about 6 months using Vista. Vista is much better (neither have ever crashed/frozen on me).

    6. Re:Which is the catch? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm a big Linux fan... but I don't understand your reasoning here:

      If Microsoft does not abandon Vista immediately and cut its losses; pretty soon it will have to abandon Windows AND Office entirely.
      How can Vista prompt this? Granted, on low-end hardware, Vista is a dog that likes interrupting you with bullshit prompts. But Microsoft is still selling XP due to popular demand.

      I would love to trumpet the impending arrival of Linux dominance but there is the reality that people and companies stick with what they know -- even if it's a PITA. MS would have to give them a major kick in the ass for them to see the hassle of moving from Windows as worth it. And I don't see even Vista doing that. At worst, companies and people will stick with XP.

      Which from Microsoft's financial perspective isn't that bad.
    7. Re:Which is the catch? by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      You question, quite validly, whether Microsoft can lose out from the Vista debacle, pointing out that business will stick with Windows (in general).

      From the pp

      Everybody from the hardware OEMs to software developers has lost out because of Vista... so they're going cross-platform (Java) or Linux (the EEE PC from Asus
      If developers go cross platform, then Microsoft won't lose out in the next year or two, but they will in 5 to 10.
      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    8. Re:Which is the catch? by jkrise · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How can Vista prompt this? Granted, on low-end hardware, Vista is a dog that likes interrupting you with bullshit prompts. But Microsoft is still selling XP due to popular demand.

      On so-called low end hardware... which is very high end for Windows 2000 (remember Win2K can do everything a home user or office user needs, TODAY )Microsoft does not have any software to offer today, that customers can buy with confidence. No doubt XP is being offered on the OLPC, the XO laptop and the EEE PC... but it's a very dicey prospect bcos July 2008 will be the last chance for OEMs to bundle XP.

      Microsoft has to create an INCENTIVE for people to use Vista; the reality today is that almost everyone removes even pre-installed Vista and loads XP. So a year from now.... 2 years after Vista has been launched; there will be hardly anyone using Vista; bcos XP is much better at getting things done and needs much lesser hardware.

      If Microsoft withdraws XP from the market in July 2008 and makes fresh sales of XP illegal; then non-corporate-licensed users looking for additional PCs will be forced to choose Vista or Mac or Linux. I doubt they will go in for Vista, because the effort to change from XP to Vista is about the same as XP to Linux or Mac.

      there is the reality that people and companies stick with what they know -- even if it's a PITA. MS would have to give them a major kick in the ass for them to see the hassle of moving from Windows as worth it. And I don't see even Vista doing that. At worst, companies and people will stick with XP.

      I think you are underestimating the power of the marketplace, word-of-mouth marketing etc. The success of gmail and Google is testimony to the fact that open source software can build world-class software solutions; that work equally well on non-MS platforms. Many companies have decided to move away from .Net; and stick to J2EE, PHP or RoR on Linux servers; with browsers the only thing needed on the client side. If a Windows desktop is unviable for a browser, companies and people will simply move to Linux desktops - the success of the Linux-based EEE PC, and Microsoft's frantic efforts to get SOME Windows OS into these tiny PCs also vindicates my point.

      Hardware OEMs will hesitate to bundle a dying OS like XP onto their latest offerings - they risk the prospective customer looking for new, flashy things... so if Vista is no good, they'd go to Ubuntu or Xandros instead. And once thousands of customers get comfy with Linux and understand its power and potential; they will never again switch back to Windows.

      In short, Microsoft has to release a new OS (not Vista... Vista has to be abandoned) before XP goes out of sale. In fact I think it's already too late... it takes atleast 2 years for the market to warm up to anything new.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    9. Re:Which is the catch? by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't even run the Oracle database...

    10. Re:Which is the catch? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You clearly mean well, but you seem to be ignoring the Slashdot writing style guide.

      Genuine Disadvantage. Very witty, but this is non standard.
      Microsoft: This is not to be used. Microshaft is the preferred way to refer to this company. M$ is an acceptable abbreviation.

      Remember, advocacy only works if we all use the same satirical terms for things. This gives the impression that not only are we rabid, obsessed and angry, we are disciplined too.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    11. Re:Which is the catch? by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      I doubt they will go in for Vista, because the effort to change from XP to Vista is about the same as XP to Linux or Mac.
      Have to call out your logic here. If it takes effort to switch to any of the examples, why would anyone switch to Mac/Linux? Generally people who find the idea of a switch daunting will go with the option that seems most obvious, that you know will allow you to continue running 90% of the software you use, and the one that all your friends use. Those who know how to deal with an OS switch may not choose Vista, but remember we form a tiny proportion of the computer user market.
    12. Re:Which is the catch? by donaldm · · Score: 1

      What seems to be stupid here is the fact you have to own the PC you are going to run Vista or XP on. Unless you have a PC that you have built yourself you will most likely have Vista or XP on it already since most people pay the Microsoft Tax. Of course if you have a pirated copy I would be surprised if you would volunteer for this Microsoft participation offer.

      As for putting Vista on your machine you would want to be confident that you PC could even run Vista. Even if you had a PC that ran Vista Home you would want to be sure that it would even run Vista Ultimate and even if you had Vista Ultimate why would you even want to participate? The same holds true for XP.

      For those brave souls that want to take up this latest Microsoft offer you want to be sure that anything you did on your monitored PC does not involve "borrowed" software and did not infringe DRM or copyright otherwise you may find yourself before a judge. Lets be honest how many home users have never "ripped" a CD or watched a downloaded movie or TV file or installed a game or application that was generously borrowed from a "friend"? If you can honestly answer "No!" then the Microsoft offer is for you.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    13. Re:Which is the catch? by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Generally people who find the idea of a switch daunting will go with the option that seems most obvious, that you know will allow you to continue running 90% of the software you use, and the one that all your friends use.

      Which was kind of... what I was saying myself. Many OEMs including Dell, are put off by lacklustre user feedback to Vista, they are preloading Linux and XP instead. Soon, there will be so many 'friends' using Linux... just like the 'friends' who introduced us to the wonders of gmail and google.

      Since Microsoft is not (so far, atleast) a hardware company; once the big OEMs politely MS to go and boil Ballsmer's head; MS is a dead duck. No wonder this year's WinHEC has been posponed... I doubt any OEM would willingly build hardware for Windows Vista alone. Most will simply build standards compliant h/w and force MS to support it on Vista.

      It won't happen all at once; but unless MS abandons Vista and comes up with a Genuine Windows Advantage OS - Bill Gates will discover that he has built a huge Windows userbase that will destory Microsoft.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    14. Re:Which is the catch? by Linker3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Glad you're not having hassles with Vista. I have just got Vista Business on a laptop at work, making a total of 3 Vista laptops in our organisation:

      Laptop 1 is mine (for supporting Vista). Yesterday I installed Adobe Acrobat 8.1 - the installer told me approximate install time was 160 minutes and it was not lying. The other day I installed another app and the same thing happened - several hours elapsed while a single app was installing. When the machine comes out of standby, it occasionally will go slow for about 10 mins (I have 1.2GB RAM). The wifi switch/LED didn't work properly until a driver update was applied.

      Laptop 2 is in marketing. The user is currently sitting in their car to be outside our wireless zone because she's trying to finish tidying a mailshot spreadsheet and the laptop keeps freezing. She was working OK on two other sites yesterday where there was no wireless so she's testing the theory that it's network-related. Her wifi switch won't turn off the adaptor reliably and it also works in reverse - when the LED is ON, the wifi is OFF and vice versa - even though the switch event handler puts on the screen 'wireless on' and 'wireless off' the right way round.

      Laptop 3 has just been brought in because it stopped making RDP connections and I have just had to hack the registry.

      I am totally neutral when it comes to Vista - I don't love it or hate it, but user experience in our office has been poor; there's too many 'rough edges' and annoying little habits - simple things like the power button options not including 'ask me what to do' and sometimes a USB mouse not being detected when plugged in etc. Overall, the support effort for just these 3 laptops is disproportionate compared to the 100-odd desktops, servers and other laptops (ranging from NT4 through 2000 to XP) we support.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    15. Re:Which is the catch? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      ...oh, I must redeem myself by adding that our core mail/database/file servers and Intranet server are all running CentOS!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    16. Re:Which is the catch? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      The longer that MS stays with XP (or something worse), the longer Linux can improve to reduce migration costs (AKA improve compatibility) and offer better alternatives to the MS way of working.

      Now, Linux must be visibly better than Windows for people migrate. That is hard to acomplish, but with Windows stagnant, time runs against Microsoft.

    17. Re:Which is the catch? by Yetihehe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not simply admit failure; accept that Vista was a crappy effort; and actually write a new OS capable of running on existing hardware; and existing software apps? The entire PC ecosystem has been broken by Vista
      No, it wasn't broken by Vista, it just actually changed. Customers do not anymore want system which is more shiny, if they need to have better hardware. They all think current hardware should support anything without any hassle and if not, then it's programmers' fault.
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    18. Re:Which is the catch? by Timex · · Score: 1

      You lead a blessed existence, then.

      I have XP on two systems (my kids use those), Vista on my personal laptop, and Linux on my desktop.

      XP is okay, for what it's used for: games and surfing the Internet.

      Vista is not bad, though I've had it "blue screen" twice in as many weeks, but I think I know what the problem is there. (When this started, I had installed a program to facilitate video communication. I'm going to remove it and see if conditions improve.) I've read a lot of articles from people slamming Vista, but to be perfectly honest, it works fine for the purposes I have for it: surfing, playing a few games (SL and Starcraft), and reading email.

      Linux, well... I don't have problems on that. The last time I rebooted, it was to enable an updated kernel.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    19. Re:Which is the catch? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      These days, Mono plus Wine would be the perfect transition tool: Wine because a lot of third party libraries for .NET use P/Invoke. Unfortunately, there's no Mono-Wine bridge, so that's currently impossible.

      Other than that, if you use NHibernate, you don't have to worry about using MS SQL; you can swap out with Postgres or MySQL easily. And then it's just a matter of Mono's completeness.

    20. Re:Which is the catch? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I used XP for 5 years and now I have about 6 months using Vista. Vista is much better

      I really wish you would elaborate, because you seem to be the first person in the world that didn't say Vista was dogshit. What does it do that you wanted XP to do but wouldn't? What doesn't it do that XP did that you didn't want?

      Sorry, but you sound like a shill. Please enlighten me, all I know about Vista is what I've read, which has all been bad.

      -mcgrew

      PS- the mods are on crack today. That AC post was modded "informative" but it didn't tell me jack shit.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    21. Re:Which is the catch? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      The entire PC ecosystem has been broken by Vista

      I'm not really sure what you mean by that. Vista hasn't changed my computing experience at all. Of course, I'm not running it, I'm running XP and Mandriva. My home PC with dual boot and my work PC with XP haven't changed a bit.

      When you have to have Vista to run new non-Microsoft programs (I was really pissed when DOOM 3 required XP and I was running 98) you can make the statement and I'll agree with you, but as of now I'm scratching my head. Huh?

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    22. Re:Which is the catch? by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They all think current hardware should support anything without any hassle and if not, then it's programmers' fault.

      And they're right. I built the PC under my desk at home five years ago, and it's still orders of magnatude more powerful than a supercomputer made when my last car (a 1988 Chevy) was built. I keep stuff for a long time; waste not, want not.

      Trading your car or computer every couple of years when it's perfectly servicable is for rich idiots. If one can afford to waste money, one should give to charity instead.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    23. Re:Which is the catch? by entmike · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Wow, I run Vista and have NONE of those problems. Sounds like a shitty install, or shitty hardware, or shitty IT. I've got Vista on my laptop and home PC, so does my roommate. Funny how none of us have had a single problem with it.

    24. Re:Which is the catch? by pfleming · · Score: 1

      Interesting. You state that it works fine for like three things. Do the games require Vista or was there another reason for installing it? I don't see any compelling reason in your list for me to upgrade.

    25. Re:Which is the catch? by pushf+popf · · Score: 5, Funny

      You guys are obviously morons. My copy of Vista works perfectly.

      I picked up a brand new really fast Toshiba with a bunch of RAM, brought it home and it ran like crap, kept crashing and accused me of stealing something or other.

      I did a little Googling and learned that the problem was bad drivers. You need to install this set of drivers named "Fedora". I popped in the "Fedora" disk, rebooted, answered a couple of questions (it must be really intelligent, since it didn't even want my Activation Key again), and everything worked great!

      Tomorrow, I'm going to call Toshiba and find out why they didn't just ship this "Fedora" update automatically.

    26. Re:Which is the catch? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      When you have to have Vista to run new non-Microsoft programs (I was really pissed when DOOM 3 required XP and I was running 98) you can make the statement and I'll agree with you, but as of now I'm scratching my head. Huh? W95/98/ME is a different architecture than WNT/XP/Vista, and there are ways to tell if you are bumping into the limitations of the W9x architecture series.

      As a quick test, open up a few browser windows on Slashdot. If you are logged in and have moderator privilages, you'll fill up the available Window handles on the W9x system, requiring you to close the browser windows in order to keep the system stable. This is the main reason why I cannot go back from Windows XP to the Windows 9x series (aside from running the very rare individual application.)

      There is a way to get it working on W98 if you really want - it involves hotwiring the call to GlobalMemoryStatusEx() - a function designed for systems and architecture that support more than 4GB of memory.
    27. Re:Which is the catch? by cbart387 · · Score: 1

      The longer that MS stays with XP (or something worse), the longer Linux can improve to reduce migration costs (AKA improve compatibility) and offer better alternatives to the MS way of working. This where I think Gnome is doing something right by trying to support OOXML. Everyone (it seems) is making a fuss about them not standing 'strong' by supporting OOXML. Seems like a smart move to me. Gnome will then be in a good position to migrate Windows users to their Windows Desktop.
      --
      Lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine.
    28. Re:Which is the catch? by cnettel · · Score: 1

      The badass feature of displaying video tiled between monitors (and for that matter, accelerated video on the secondary monitor) properly!

    29. Re:Which is the catch? by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was going to sign up so I can set up a boot camp partition legitimately on my MacBook Pro. Use it every once in a while to see how a webpage loads in IE or something. Let them monitor that usage. Repeat for 3 months, then uninstall their monitoring software.

    30. Re:Which is the catch? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      64 bit is the catch. Even though microsoft has 32 bit versions. If the hardware can run 64 bit then vista runs better. I tried this with a 32 bit processor and a 64 bit processor and the rest of the machine was the same. (2 GB ram, areo graphics card, 300 sata drive, all the drivers work no errors) with the 64 processor the system ran fine. Use the 32 processor, super slow doing everything. loading apps, surfing, simple things took forever. On the 64 bit processor everything fine. Granted I am not talking lightning fast here this is older hardware. But taking 5 minutes to create a PDF on the 32 bit processor and under a minute on the 64 bit processor (same document) on the same machine otherwise did point out something. I thought vista was supposed to be 64 bit only. They added 32 bit in at the end. Maybe there is some truth to that.

    31. Re:Which is the catch? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Vista Home Premium running Photoshop CS3 Extended:

      Opening an image takes nearly 15 seconds. Opening multiple images takes 15 seconds EACH.

      The image is clicked to open. The circle thing swirls a while. Then nothing happens. Then the cirle swirls some more and 15 seconds later, the image opens. Batch processing is a fucking nightmare, naturally.

      The cause? The print spooler. Photoshop on Vista (not XP) is consulting with the print spooler before allowing the image to open. FFS. The solution: kill the spooler; the images open instantly.

      I don't know which is worse, Vista or Adobe's stuff - their updater is a real turd. Either way, it seems like they're racing each other to the bottom in terms of bloat and poor performance.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    32. Re:Which is the catch? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I've since been forced to buy XP, thanks to my daughter's inadvertantly installing Sony's rootkit and my losing the CDs with audio and video drivers, which weren't available for 98 any more.

      The question still stands, what will Vista do that XP wpn't, and what annoyance in XP is removed in Vista?

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    33. Re:Which is the catch? by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Mono/Wine is an interesting cross-platform alternative i hadn't thought of before. Mono would have the advantage of being able to use Visual Studio for development (which, to me, is still the top development environment). On the other hand, Java does seem to be becoming the first choice for cross-platform development.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    34. Re:Which is the catch? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has to create an INCENTIVE for people to use Vista; the reality today is that almost everyone removes even pre-installed Vista and loads XP. So a year from now.... 2 years after Vista has been launched; there will be hardly anyone using Vista; bcos XP is much better at getting things done and needs much lesser hardware.

      This is senseless. The hardware requirements of Vista, in the context of contemporary machines, are not signficant.

      If Microsoft withdraws XP from the market in July 2008 and makes fresh sales of XP illegal; then non-corporate-licensed users looking for additional PCs will be forced to choose Vista or Mac or Linux. I doubt they will go in for Vista, because the effort to change from XP to Vista is about the same as XP to Linux or Mac.

      Utter tripe. Even for the typical home user, the difference between using XP (or even Windows 95, FFS) and Vista is minimal. For a business, which then has to also reimplement much of the supporting infrastructure, where the difference between going from XP to Vista is non-trivial, it pales into insignificant compared to going from XP to OSX or Linux. Even in a relatively ideal situation, where you have no dependencies on Windows-only applications and a smallish, nimble company, such a migration would still be a massive undertaking.

      In short, Microsoft has to release a new OS (not Vista... Vista has to be abandoned) before XP goes out of sale. In fact I think it's already too late... it takes atleast 2 years for the market to warm up to anything new.

      Vista's reception is little different to XP's, and the same result will occur. It might take a bit longer, because XP has a much higher "it's good enough" rating than Windows 98 did, but it'll happen eventually.

    35. Re:Which is the catch? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You think that's a bad thing?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    36. Re:Which is the catch? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      Why would I want video tiled betweeen monitors when I have a video card with S-Video out and an forty two inch TV with S-Video in? In Linux I can have multiple monitors, and it's had that feature for years. Amout time Microsoft started catching up with Linux!

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    37. Re:Which is the catch? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      but it's a very dicey prospect bcos July 2008 will be the last chance for OEMs to bundle XP.
      If they want they can buy system builder packs until january 2009 and I don't think there is anything stopping people stocking up on those packs.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    38. Re:Which is the catch? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Many OEMs including Dell, are put off by lacklustre user feedback to Vista
      maybe

      they are preloading Linux and XP instead.
      Dell at least in the uk are offering XP on thier buisness orientated lines but not on most of thier consumer orientated lines. As for linux they only offer it on a few lines. Many OEMs are even worse.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    39. Re:Which is the catch? by entmike · · Score: 1

      I was responding to someone who was also using personal anecdote as their sample size. Then again, this is Slashdot, so it really doesn't matter. Vista works for me so I chose to direct my nerd-rage at things that DON'T work for me.

    40. Re:Which is the catch? by Timex · · Score: 1

      You state that it works fine for like three things. Do the games require Vista or was there another reason for installing it? I don't see any compelling reason in your list for me to upgrade.

      I bought a laptop in April (an HP Pavilion dv9235nr), and it came with Vista installed.

      Is Vista something I would buy? I seriously doubt it. I wouldn't go out and buy ANY Microsoft operating system, if I had the choice.

      The only reason I bother with it instead of putting Linux on there is that the laptop has features built-in (wi-fi, webcam, TV tuner) that don't work under Linux without some effort, and in the case of the webcam, it would take more effort than I have time to commit. It was easier for me to re-install Vista from the backups I made. (I tried to make Linux work on this beast for about two months before I gave up. It wasn't that Linux wasn't working, but that I wanted more from it than it was able to provide, because the drivers just weren't there.)

      I don't have the option of "(up|down)grading" unless I'm willing to shell out >$100 on WinXP, and that isn't going to happen. Vista it is, then. It's not so bad.

      The point of my comment is that it doesn't seem to be as bad as the pundits claim it to be, so if Vista comes on a new system by default, perhaps one shouldn't re-install an operating system without seeing if it suits one's needs.

      Whether one wants to spend the money on it, well... I can't make that call for anyone but me. I wouldn't buy a Microsoft OS for anything. All the systems I have with XP or Vista on them came to me that way.
      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  3. Not accurate. by Junta · · Score: 5, Informative

    They want to monitor whatever you are currently using today, XP or Vista, and won't give the goods until after three months of watching your stuff.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Not accurate. by lionchild · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And what if you're not using XP or Vista currently? Are you just left out, or do they have a linux tool to monitor you?

      I've got a machine still loaded with OS/2. And a nice little G4 with OS X 10.4.11.

      --
      Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    2. Re:Not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "They want to monitor whatever you are currently using today, XP or Vista..."

      Which is another catch. They will only give you a "free" version if you are already a Microsoft customer. They want to install monitoring software on your box to upload to their server. So Linux and Mac users looking to score are SOL.

    3. Re:Not accurate. by vladsinger · · Score: 1

      Then they can monitor your nonuse of Windows.

    4. Re:Not accurate. by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Looking to score for the other team?

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    5. Re:Not accurate. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wonder if this applies to my Amiga too. Damn Microsoft for not porting their stuff. :-(

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're fucked! Plain and simple.......FUCKED! The Microsuck way. :-)

    7. Re:Not accurate. by WK2 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they would let me use a pirated copy.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    8. Re:Not accurate. by Mr_eX9 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound so bad. Just set up a WinXP VMWare image and leave it idle for three months--and bam! Free coaster. Err, Vista.

    9. Re:Not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you're out of luck.

      They're trying to improve their products, and the rewards for you helping to do that is to be given a copy of another of their products.

      How does Linux enter into this? MacOS I can kind of understand, as some MS products are released for MacOS.

      But to keep mentioning Linux makes you look stupid. They want to get feedback on how their software is currently used. There software doesn't run on Linux. How difficult is that to understand?

      I hate MS, but stupid posts like yours only make the community look like immature children.

    10. Re:Not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How does Linux enter into this?"

      Dual boot. Maybe you've heard of it?

    11. Re:Not accurate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't really be that stupid, can you?

      If you're going to be booting into Windows, install the client IN WINDOWS. That's what they want to monitor in the first place.

      Honestly, I give up in this discussion. D

    12. Re:Not accurate. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that I can keep an copy of XP idling in a sandboxed virtual machine for 3 months. Would they be interested in the logs for that?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. What happens if you STOP participating? by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 1

    I'm to lazy to RTFA, so, any idea what happens if you suddenly stop responding to their survey questions?

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:What happens if you STOP participating? by R4nneko · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the FAQ: If I decide to stop participating, how do I opt out? Your participation is entirely voluntary, so you may withdraw from the program at any time, with no consequence. If you decide to withdraw from the program, send us an e-mail at winpanel@microsoft.com with the word "remove" in the subject line, and we will take care of it. You should also uninstall our software. It then gives instructions to uninstall the software. And also, you don't get the software until you have participated for a certain amount of time.

    2. Re:What happens if you STOP participating? by anzev · · Score: 1

      But you have to uninstall only the monitoring software, not Vista for example, or Encarta, or Office...

    3. Re:What happens if you STOP participating? by Bwian_of_Nazareth · · Score: 1

      Why would you have to uninstall Vista or Encarta or Office? You get the "free" software only _after_ your monitoring period is over, not before. So when you opt out, you have nothing to be uninstalled except for the monitoring software.

  5. pr0n ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use it only for browsing pr0n! heh heh he

    1. Re:pr0n ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, make a script that continuously uses IE to search for, browse, and download goat porn. I'm talking about saturating 100% of your unused bandwidth 24/7 for the entire 3 months. For extra credit, get as many computers on as many net connections as you can doing this.

      I don't know what they're monitoring exactly, but I'm pretty sure that will skew the results... somehow.

    2. Re:pr0n ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your pr0n and raise you Windows Goat edition

    3. Re:pr0n ? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      There's a flaw in your logic.

      Many porn sites infect & crash windows.

      But I like where your head is at.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  6. Webcam + Wood Maul by explosivejared · · Score: 5, Funny

    The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program.

    This is how I would go about this. I would get a free copy of vista. Then, I would set web cam up outside on the driveway. I would grab a wood maul and just go to town on the disc, and do my best to savor the thought of MS technicians staring on in horror.

    --
    I got a catholic block.
    1. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by Darby · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would grab a wood maul and just go to town on the disc, and do my best to savor the thought of MS technicians staring on in horror.

      You misspelled "longing".

    2. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Install it on a system. Write a script to constantly browse the most absurd things or nonstop linux stuff and then let it sit in the corner for a few months, until you qualify for the free copy.

    3. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I watch? It'd be like porn for the open source community. _________________________________________________________________ If you can't beat it, be assimilated by it. Resistance is futile.

    4. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha I love the internet

    5. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      What's the downside for MS? They have still monitored you actively using Windows/Office for three months, and you've already filled in their questionaire. Unless you're deliberatly poisoned the pool with bogus usage data, it doesn't matter to them if you make a youtube video to show your friends what a rebel you are.

    6. Re:Webcam + Wood Maul by mrdarreng · · Score: 1

      This is how I would go about this. I would get a free copy of vista. Then, I would set web cam up outside on the driveway. I would grab a wood maul and just go to town on the disc, and do my best to savor the thought of MS technicians staring on in horror. Are you kidding? They'd be laughing at how stupid you look smashing something on your driveway with a wood maul. They'd probably wonder if it was a +2 Strength maul and what enchantments it had, that would make you record yourself doing it.

      You'd be the new light saber kid!
  7. No longer available by beavis88 · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least not the free gift part. From an email received from Microsoft posted to hardwareanalysis.com forums:

    "What happened to the free product option?

    Thank you for your interest in the feedback program. Due to overwhelming response, the supply of gifts have been exhausted so we have closed our free product offer on 12/11/2007 at 2pm. Thanks to everyone that participated!"

    1. Re:No longer available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the problem was that Vista still overpriced...

    2. Re:No longer available by jx100 · · Score: 1

      So... they've run out of Windows.

      Sweet!

    3. Re:No longer available by kaos07 · · Score: 1

      They must have only offered 3 copies because I can't see an 'overwhelming' response to get Vista, even if it is free.

    4. Re:No longer available by moondo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is probably something to do with sites like Slickdeals.net that caught on the deal earlier and maxed out the freebie. Just one of their threads on this deal has over 47,000 views.

    5. Re:No longer available by matria · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they'll ever publish information on how many of these "free" installations actually participate, how many properly disengage, and how many just disappear?

    6. Re:No longer available by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      So, basically what happened is that the moment they saw kdawson post this article to Slashdot, they foresaw the inevitable slashdotting and cancelled the beta test.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    7. Re:No longer available by KodePhreak · · Score: 1

      pfffttt I'm not a US citizen either *cries for a bit*

  8. this is going to be bad by zionian117 · · Score: 0

    this is going to be really bad if everyone rejects this offer too.. Funny too. I'm scared that if this is successful, it will show how less people care about their privacy.(yep, we have seen that with all those social networking sites with those drunk photos.) No thanks Microsoft, I love my ubuntu

  9. I presume.. by Junta · · Score: 1

    They won't send the product to you. They only send you the 'prize' after they are satisfied, after three months of monitoring on whatever you are doing.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:I presume.. by preem · · Score: 0

      Oh so i have to use pirated version for 3 months before i get a legit copy.

  10. Bad because... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait - it's not. You're giving something (information to them) to get something (free OS). Nothing wrong with that.

  11. Reminds me of an offer I got in jail by unassimilatible · · Score: 5, Funny

    "All the sex you want! But you're not going to like the catch."

    --
    Slashdot "libertarians": Small government for me, big government for those I disagree with. -1, I disagree with you
    1. Re:Reminds me of an offer I got in jail by deftones_325 · · Score: 0

      So, were you a pitcher, or a catcher? Pitcher=Microsoft ... Catcher=You dropped the soap

      --
      "A gentleman never strikes a lady with his hat on." - Fred Allen
    2. Re:Reminds me of an offer I got in jail by heinousjay · · Score: 0, Troll

      You just dissected the frog.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  12. I'm gonna fire up a bunch of VM's by apparently · · Score: 1

    and let "the program" monitor a nice stream of goatse.

    1. Re:I'm gonna fire up a bunch of VM's by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Stream?

      You're thinking of tubgirl.

      *shivers*

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  13. Honeypot by fractalVisionz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I should set up a honeypot with their products. Hopefully when they are watching, they will get a virus or infected by a bot net.

  14. Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Z80xxc! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Instead of letting them see every single thing you do on your computer for a whole 3 months (or longer... who knows what stays on your computer after installing the software), why not install Windows XP in a VM, install their crap, run it once or twice a week to "check your email" or whatever, and then after three months, collect your software? They only see what goes on in the VM, you get your free Vista and everyone's happy. Well, if using Vista can be considered as something that would make you happy.

    Just to show how bad their monitoring actually is:

    3. Additional data collection

    The following list describes some examples of additional data collection our software performs:

    • Windows settings and usage, such as the number of user accounts on the computer and the view settings for Control Panel (that is, if you use the default Category view or the Classic view to display Control Panel).
    • Details about your computer hardware, such as processor type and speed (as well as the number of processors), system memory, video memory, and other hardware configuration information.
    • File and folder information, such as the number of files and folders located in common places (for example, in Documents).
      * Which programs you open (for example, which application you use to read your e-mail).
      * Changes you make to your hardware or software.
      * Problems you encounter, such as application crashes.

    They're basically looking at everything you do. Here's my favorite bit from the whole thing:

    This sounds good, but I'm still concerned. Is this anything like the "spyware" I've heard about?
    No, this is not spyware. You choose to participate in the Windows Feedback Program and you can easily withdraw from the Program at any time with no penalty whatsoever.

    This sounds like spyware? Yeah, I'll say. But noooooooo, it's not at all harmful for your computer. Rigghhhtttt....

    1. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Kawahee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're basically looking at everything you do
      Yes, they're looking at everything they do with Windows, not everything you do with your data.
      --
      I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
    2. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      As long as the data isn't personally identifiable there shouldn't be a real privacy concern. The problem is you have no way of knowing for sure if it is personal data or not. For example, the number of files and folders on your hard drive isn't really sensitive personal information, I wouldn't care if MS or anyone knew that, but the names of the files and folders would be a concern to me. Same with e-mail and user accounts. How many e-mails I get a day, how long I have Thunderbird open, those aren't privacy issues but things like the sender, subject, and body of the e-mails would be. With so many skeptical eyes pointing at them, I doubt MS would try and sneak something in there that looks at more than it's supposed to, or more than they admit to in the agreement. They'd be risking a lot and not getting very much in return. Ultimately it's a question of whether or not you trust MS, personally I don't have any suspicions that they're collecting more than they say they are, but I don't blame anyone for not giving MS the benefit of the doubt.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      [i]
      Which programs you open
      [/i]

      Tub girl 50 times day!

    4. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Junta · · Score: 5, Funny
      Cause for concern:

      Will I be able to see what data I'm sharing with you?

      Unfortunately, you will not be able to look at your specific data. We designed the Windows Feedback Program software specifically to avoid any interference with your work or how your computer functions. To do that, the data you are sharing is stored in a binary format (zeros and ones) rather than in text format. Storing the data in binary format makes it very small and easy to share with us, but difficult for you to translate and interpret. Damn, stored in zeros and ones, nothing I can do, it's binary. There's no way they could let me know how to understand it. If only it were just zeros, or ones, or maybe some twos...
      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had heard about this earlier, I would have installed Sony's Rootkit and ran World of Warcraft (with their Warden software) along with their monitoring software and seen how they responded to one another. :p

      It would be like a legitimate spyware shootout. I don't know if my Barton 2800 would handle it very well though.

    6. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      That is either shocking incompetence or hilarious parody. Did that really come from their privacy policy?

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    7. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by mrscott · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I guess it depends on how you personally think of spyware. Me - if I opt in and tell Microsoft that it's ok for them to do this and I'm getting something in return - yep, that's probably not spyware in the malware sense.


      And, if they're checking your hardware, they can probably tell very easily if it's running in a VM.


      Interesting how you define "everything". I doubt they really care what I have in my Word files, what I have in my Excel spreadsheets, etc. They're looking for general usage patterns to identify how people are really using their software. In my opinion, this is a GOOD THING. Instead of making, for example, the assumption that everyone just loves the new Control Panel layout, they're actually "polling" users via this method.


      Chalk one up for MS on this one.

    8. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it's called, they're actually out to see how people are ACTUALLY using windows, instead of how they SHOULD be using windows. Probably doing the market research to see what features to axe, where to add in stability, and what hacks are being used most often. What support issues to address.

      Now if only really tech-oriented people managed to get into this program, they would have a good base to make the next version of windows. However, because you're all paranoid about the evil Microsoft, they'll be stuck with old people and naive kids providing the course of the future for their product line x.x

      Maybe even make Windows 7 usable again. Since they apparently didn't succeed with Vista.

    9. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Or it could be pandering to people who have no idea what a binary format is, and need a simple explanation. Don't tell me you've never given a quick, snappy (if lacking) summary of something to someone not very technically inclined...

    10. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Similarly, Valve Software (makers of Half-Life etc, for the two people that don't know) have an opt in hardware survey, where they collect and then publicly aggregate statistics on the hardware people use to run their games. They also recently started a system where you can see how many people died in a location on a specific map in their more recent games. Quite cool, and the statistics are interesting (interestingly, there's only about 1k people using anything below Windows 2000, and 82k Vista users).

      I assume Microsoft's aims are similar to Valve's; they want to know who to target and what they did wrong. Never know, might end up being a good thing.

    11. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by ch0knuti · · Score: 1

      Too bad I don't have mod points right now, if that it true it dosen't deserve to be modded funny it deserves informative.

    12. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I know, if you collect any data that shows someone has committed a crime, you're obliged to tell the police. E.g. psychologists have to report criminal activity if they are told about it, despite doctor/patient confidentiality. Let's suppose they collect a bunch of data on file accesses, which showed you downloading from bittorrent. If it is analyzed by a machine, I guess you haven't told a Microsoft employee and Microsoft is in the clear. But what happens if they send the log to a real person and he spots what you're doing? Then he'd know that you'd committed a crime and I think if he asked the company lawyers they'd advise him to report it.

      Maybe they can anonymize the logs so that a real person wouldn't know the identity of the person being monitored. But that seems like destruction of evidence to me. I'm not sure. But there was a case where a judge ordered a torrent site to turn over a list of IP addresses. They said that they only kept them in Ram, and they were ordered to log them to disk.

      E.g. here

      http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/28/1912247

      So it seems like not only are you obligated to turn over evidence of criminal activity, you can actually be forced to record it permanently if you weren't already. I guess if you refuse, that would be destruction of evidence or contempt of court or something which would have serious penalties. All of which makes collecting data from people a bit of a minefield. It seems like if it is anonymous enough for them to sign up it will be too anonymous for a court if there is a possibility that any of the people you are collecting from are bittorrent users.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it looks like you don't know much.

      Mandated reporting laws require people who work certain jobs for a living (therapists, teachers, nurses, doctors, etc) to report information to authorities in order to protect someone from clear and present danger. If they learn of a child being abused, they have to report it. If someone claims they're going to shoot someone in the head, they have to report it. If someone says they're going to commit suicide, they have to report it.

      If you tell a therapist that you're going to shoplift a cd from best buy, there is no present danger, and confidentiality applies. If you tell a therapist that you are depressed because you robbed a liquor store and shot someone, there is no present danger, and confidentiality applies. Information of a crime in this context cannot be disclosed without the client's consent or a court issued order.

      If a therapist overhears a plot to shoot someone in the head while in the grocery store, they don't have to report it either; mandated reporting only applies while they're on the clock. That being said, any decent human being would probably call the cops...

    14. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      That, plus the people who wrote their FAQ are NOT the same people who designed the software. They asked the people who designed the software, got a technical answer that had something to do with a binary data format, and translated the answer into what you see.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    15. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

      Sony Rootkit isn't "Legitimate".

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    16. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Since when does "File and Folder information" not consider my data? They give an innocent example, "the number of files in your Documents". Now let's assume they are really in good faith, don't you think they'll still look at the file extensions and corresponding file sizes? If I were collecting statistics for Microsoft, I sure would like to see that. Where do you keep your copied music? Or big movie files.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    17. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://wfp.microsoft.com/FAQ.aspx It's neither. It seems to me that they needed some sort of excuse to prevent users reading the data collected about them.

    18. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Kawahee · · Score: 1

      I'd assume Microsoft would be smart enough that if they're trying to avoid collecting personally identifiable information that they're not going to be sending the file names and your hard drive's file and folder heirarchy down the tube for analysis. I'd think they'd leave file/folder names out of it (aside from My Documents etc) and just have extensions:

      C:\Users\****\Documents\
      4 file(s)
      + DOCX (128kb)
      + DOCX (41kb)
      + DOCX (22kb)
      + MP3 (8.8mb)

      --
      I'll subscribe to Slashdot when I see a month without a dupe, a typo, or an article the "editors" didn't read.
    19. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK Sparky.. and they won't notice that virtual harddisk in your configuration data that they're collecting...

    20. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
      You mean this

      http://www.steampowered.com/status/survey.html

      Very interesting. Quite a lot of Vista users - 12%

      Windows XP 564,035 83.78 %
      Windows Vista 82,764 12.29 %
      Windows Vista 64 bit 15,749 2.34 %
      Windows 2003 64 bit 5,309 0.79 %
      Windows 2000 4,372 0.65 %
      Only about 7.5 of all users can use DirectX 10

      DirectX10 Systems (Vista with DirectX10 GPU) - 7.59% of users
      The Intel/AMD split is 56%/43% too, so the Core2 hasn't killed AMD by any means.
      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you're ripping them off so much. They're giving people a chance to sell data about their usage habits to MS in exchange for some free, very valuable software. Yeah, yeah, I know Windows sucks, and I know you'd probably rather buy five copies over being forced to endure using one for three months, but so what? You don't have to participate. You can tell your friends, warn them about the risks of openly sharing usage habits and about the minimum usage standard, and who knows? Maybe your friends will be better off?

      Not only that, but monitoring usage patterns may actually end up with improvements in future releases, but I can't say I'm optimistic...

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    22. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause for concern Concern, yes. Cause to raise hell and send this to every news medium/blog/concerned person on earth. Normally I would consider it petty to spend time trying to defame a company, but this is just outrageous. It starts off being funny, then you realize this is an actual response from a multi-billion dollar corporation. What the hell does the storage format have to do with interference with user activity? They're lying through their teeth.
    23. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This sounds like spyware? Yeah, I'll say. But noooooooo, it's not at all harmful for your computer. Rigghhhtttt.... No, it's not under my definition of spyware. In order to be spyware it must be at least somewhat covert - hidden in a EULA, pretending to be regular freeware/shareware or otherwise misleading and deceptive about its function. This application has one stated purpose, it's stated loud and clear and if you install this it's your choice, just like running a publicly available webcam 24/7 is. If you consider installing this to be poor judgement I'm inclined to agree, but that does not in any way make this spyware.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    24. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows settings and usage, such as the number of user accounts on the computer and the view settings for Control Panel (that is, if you use the default Category view or the Classic view to display Control Panel).

      Hallelujah! Maybe hey'll actually get rid of the useless Start Menu and Control Panel interfaces that made their debut in XP! Nobody whose computers I manage use it - they're all on Classic view.

      Next up - that damned complicated useless search window - and your little dog, too!

    25. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Viceroy+Potatohead · · Score: 1

      If only it were just zeros, or ones, or maybe some twos... There, there. It's just a bad dream. There's no such thing as two.
    26. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, don't you need a valid license to install Windows XP/Vista in a VM to begin with? You will have to activate long before the "collection" period is over. Unless you have extra volume keys lying around or are doing this illegally I don't see how you can have a virtual install long enough to collect the free license.

    27. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by ZeroFactorial · · Score: 1
      Because maybe they won't notice that all of the hardware drivers are labeled "VMWare"...

      Of course, if they opt to not send you your free copy of vista, you'll be the real winner anyway.

      Anyone else think it's funny that Microsoft can hardly get people to sign up for FREE copies of Vista?
      You know your product sucks when....

      Hey wait, I remember another company whose products turned into coasters. Where is AOL today anyway?

      You know a product has failed when: (This is fun - it works with terms like "Windows Vista" and "Democracy")

      You know you want our [insert product here].

      You don't?

      Here, we'll give you a free trial of [insert product here] for a trial period, only we're going to monitor your usage of it, and if you like it, you get the full version free!

      You still don't want it?

      Look it's free - you'd have to be crazy to not want it! We'll just keep monitoring your usage until you decide you want to keep it.



      In an anti-climactic finish, I actually support the liberation of captive peoples. Democracy seeks to liberate whilst Microsoft seeks to enslave...
    28. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by secPM_MS · · Score: 1
      If I didn't already have my kids running on a Vista system, I would have no qualms taking advantage of this offer. I am already running them as normal users with parental controls and auditing enabled (and I do check the audit record). My wife and I run on another system, and there is nothing interesting in our use of that system as well - a little browsing, banking, Word, and solitaire. But I already have Vista on that as well. Both also have Office 12.

      MS is clearly trying to get some detailed consumer usage data for system optimization and feature planning purposes. It is trying to get data on the use of the system by people who run Windows to make their user experience better. The tradeoff strikes me as reasonable for many users.

    29. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      "If it is analyzed by a machine, I guess you haven't told a Microsoft employee and Microsoft is in the clear."

      That would run contrary to law enforcement using cameras and remote trackers/traffic counters/cell phone cell-site-traversal timings when issuing speeding citations.

      The machines can issue citations with evidence and the charges/citations will stick in court. If a software company using automated gear finds irrefutable or irresistible evidence of crime, why would not the computer be considered an employee? Because it lacks a soul and is non-ambulatory? Doesn't take/give a dump? If a quad-amputee employee sat an monitored evidence of a crime, it would count, right? Despite the employee being limited in some way?

      I'm not defending ms' monitoring (of data), just pointing out my take.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    30. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is either shocking incompetence or hilarious parody.

      It's from Microsoft... all of the above!

    31. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      No, you've completely missed my point. My point is that if your computer collects a log of you breaking the law and passes it to another machine at Microsoft which analyzes the log to collect data on something other than lawbreaking - in the Microsoft case usage data - then Microsoft Inc doesn't know you've broken the law. The machine could see bittorrent.exe call socket functions and read files, but it doesn't know what these mean because it's just programmed to check performance and collect usage patterns, not catch bittorrent piracy.

      But let's suppose that log shows you doing something illegal and a Microsoft employee sees it and recognizes what the log means. He does have that insight - he notices from the filename that you're uploading some song by Metallica which you clearly don't have the right to copy.

      Now at this point he goes to ask the legal department whether he should report it to the police. At this point Microsoft Inc does know. My guess is that they would tell him to report it just to cover themselves.

      If a quad-amputee employee sat an monitored evidence of a crime, it would count, right? Despite the employee being limited in some way?

      This actually made me laugh out loud.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    32. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Glad you had a laugh. Thanks for reading and setting me straight...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    33. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're basically looking at everything you do.

      They look at your Windows settings, hardware configuration, and application usage patterns. That's not even remotely close to basically everything. They don't know the contents of your emails, the locations of the web sites you visit, or the files you open. Basically nothing is far closer to the truth than basically everything.

      But noooooooo, it's not at all harmful for your computer.

      How the hell is this harmful to your computer?

      Moderators, what the hell are you doing? There is not a shred of anything insightful about this post. Stop making the community look like a bunch of crackpots by positively moderating this sort of dreck.

    34. Re:Hide your own habits... use a VM! by macbutch · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, Bender, there's no such thing as two.

  15. I'm actually happy with Linux by pravuil · · Score: 0, Redundant

    not going to do it.

    1. Re:I'm actually happy with Linux by renegadesx · · Score: 1

      I woulda done it, ran it on my old AMD3000+, 2GB Ram, GeForceFX5200 trying to play Crysis while compressing video with downloading p0rn in the back ground.

      Give them a nice bunch of panics AND get a free coaster out of it

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:I'm actually happy with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one that thinks it's time to retire this one?

      PS - For a "professional troll", you sure aren't up on current events...

    3. Re:I'm actually happy with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No harm in looking at alternatives. If they were actually offering a copy to non-Windows customers I'd take it, play with it and see if it's any good (since I've never used Vista).

  16. Bad deal! by messier31 · · Score: 1

    Wow, you get Windows for free, but they monitor you???!?!?! I'm stick-in to Tiger.

  17. Prior Art by madbawa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They want us to let them monitor use of their program?? Don't they do that already???

    1. Re:Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they'll be honest about it.

  18. i don't see the issue by xubu_caapn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see the issue here. No question of privacy really, people can choose to do this or not, and it's openly the catch. Microsoft probably wants to watch people's use of it to see what people have trouble with and what they can improve..

    --
    FYI: I don't know what you guys are talking about half the time.
    1. Re:i don't see the issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one really said there was much of an issue; the article is just some information about a "deal" some people might be interested in. That said, I have no idea why this is a slashdot article, let alone news.

    2. Re:i don't see the issue by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      I only use Windows for tech support, the occasional Windows-only utility, and games. All my real work is done under Ubuntu or OS X. I'd take Microsoft up on their offer, if for no other reason than to - ugh - get more familiar with Vista.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    3. Re:i don't see the issue by Technician · · Score: 1

      don't see the issue here. No question of privacy really, people can choose to do this or not, and it's openly the catch. Microsoft probably wants to watch people's use of it to see what people have trouble with and what they can improve..

      Funny thing is they may find people never use ebay, paypal, or online banking. (Would you log into any of these on a monitored computer?)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:i don't see the issue by matria · · Score: 1

      er... isn't that what beta testing is for?

    5. Re:i don't see the issue by xubu_caapn · · Score: 1

      i don't necessarily mean bugs but better-designed UI, if you see a person is searching a while for a single function to make it more apparent, things like that. testing something like that across multiple products would be a lot of beta testing...

      --
      FYI: I don't know what you guys are talking about half the time.
    6. Re:i don't see the issue by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1

      ...people never use ebay, paypal, or online banking. (Would you log into any of these on a monitored computer?)
      Yeah, because Microsoft is desperate to steal a couple thousand dollars from your bank account. It's not like they already have more money than God. They're gonna be going after robbing a bunch of paranoid geeks. Also, they see no reason why that behavior would cause a problem with the law or a PR nightmare.
    7. Re:i don't see the issue by oni · · Score: 1

      watch people's use of it to see what people have trouble with and what they can improve..

      And their philosophy is, there is nothing that cannot be improved through the liberal application of animated paperclips or dogs, or annoying popup balloon tips.

    8. Re:i don't see the issue by uniqueUser · · Score: 1

      Just as an FYI, I have the WFP running. Using Process Explorer from sysinternals.com I was able to grab what is below. I cut some of it out to get past /.'s Lameness Filter.

      --Best Wishes

      Software\Microsoft\WFPUser
      Detected %d apps
      Could not start AlwaysRunApp ---> "%s"
      Started AlwaysRunApp ---> "%s" .exe
      ***ERROR*** No scheduled app enteries found!!
      Could not run: %s
      %s Completed
      %s Started
      Attempting to run %s
      Started to run ---> "%s"
      Name
      %s.lnk
      DataFileFormat
      Software\Microsoft\WFPUser\%s
      user.xml.lnk
      AppNames
      RunScheduledApps()
      Failed to launch User registration app
      *** ERROR: Failed to launch WfpUserReg.exe since it could not be found!!
      Attempting to launch: "%s"
      WfpUserReg.exe
      %s\PanelId.txt
      WFPUser Registration FAILED. Waiting for next login to try again...
      IDLE_STATE
      ***** WFP_EXIT_USER_STATEMACHINE_EVENT *****
      WFPUser setting FileFlush event
      *** WFPUser New Session Detected ***
      WFPUser Initialize FAILED. Trying again
      UserRegistration FAILED
      WFPUser moving on to: USER_WAIT_FOR_SERVICE_INIT_STATE
      UserRegistration SUCCEEDED
      USER_REGISTER_STATE
      WFPUser moving on to: USER_REGISTER_STATE
      WFPUser Initialize SUCCEEDED
      USER_INITIALIZE_STATE
      WFPUser moving on to: USER_INITIALIZE_STATE
      Failed to get the list of apps from the registry. Re-Initializing...
      WFPUser moving on to: USER_RUN_APPS_STATE
      Finished running Always-Running apps
      USER_ALWAYSRUNNING_APPS_STATE
      USER_RUN_APPS_STATE
      WFPUser colud not get MachineID, service probably hasn't initialized it yet. Trying again next time.
      WFPUser could not initialize UserID. Trying again next time.
      WFPUser initialized userid, moving on to alwaysrunning apps state.
      WFP_EXIT_USER_STATEMACHINE_EVENT
      Started UserStateMachineThread()

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  19. You know you wanna... by br1an.warner · · Score: 1

    ...have a usage report that shows you running VMware with an image called "Ubuntu" 100% of the time!

  20. Upon further digging by HadesInjustice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does the software impact the performance of my computer? "We have gone to great lengths to design the Windows Feedback Program software to limit the amount of computer resources it uses to collect data. You may see a minor change in performance when you first log in to Windows; however, this typically only occurs during the first few minutes after login while we are collecting basic configuration information." In my opinion, that translate to... "The print out of the code is so lengthy the printer ran out of ink, twice. The software will not severely hamper the performance of the computer (as compare to Vista that already used up ~500mb of RAM on idle, there isn't all that much performance left to hamper anyway). After you first log in, we are going to collect some basic information and make sure you have an authentic Windows OS. We might decide to sue you or disable your OS if we found it to be pirated."

    1. Re:Upon further digging by sqrt(2) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do people still not understand how Vista manages RAM? This is slashdot, of all places I'd expect the people here to understand pre-emptive caching. That 50% RAM usage isn't Vista, it's all kinds of stuff that you are constantly opening being kept in memory so that the next time you need it the program can open faster. It learns your habits and caches stuff it knows you frequently use. It's the reason why WMP11, firefox, or word opens nearly instantly when I click on it. You can even turn this feature off it bugs you so much, it's a service called superfetch.

      There are legitimate reasons for disliking Vista, there's so many in fact that you don't need to be using this false one to pad your list of complaints. When you do, it weakens your argument and makes it look like you don't have any idea what you're talking about.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    2. Re:Upon further digging by HadesInjustice · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am sorry if I am a chemical engineer and not a EE or CS major. But if what you said is true, then the RAM usage on a perfectly new computer with Vista shouldn't used up around 500mb of RAM either, but they are. Also, if it already cache the information, then how come every time I open Firefox or Winamp, I see a clear jump in my RAM memory? What I mean is...why is it that Vista sit at idle at around ~500mb, and the moment I open firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant?

    3. Re:Upon further digging by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      This remains incorrect. The 500MB /is/ actual core system process memory usage. It can be greatly reduced by turning off extraneous processes. The additional memory used for superfetch - which I agree is a great thing to finally see Windows doing - is above and beyond that 500MB.

    4. Re:Upon further digging by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      "But if what you said is true, then the RAM usage on a perfectly new computer with Vista shouldn't used up around 500mb of RAM either, but they are."

      The computer prefetches more or less the same amount every time. On a fresh install, the algorithm isn't really helping as much, since it has yet to learn, but it is still running.

      "Also, if it already cache the information, then how come every time I open Firefox or Winamp, I see a clear jump in my RAM memory?"

      Before I list reasons, I have not note: if Vista is idling at 500 MB, and then jumping to 650-700 MB, something else is going on because a fresh start of firefox does not take 200 MB on any OS I've ever tried. I've seen firefox balloon that high, but never start above 100. Even now, after a couple week's heavy use without closing it, it's taking 175 MB on Vista Ultimate x64 (Firefox 2, I haven't bothered hitting the update button yet). Do you have a legion of extensions or something?

      Because of several things. For one, the Task Manager reports isn't perfectly related to actual memory usage. It's not useless, but you can't draw too many inferences. It caches a little of the most-used part of your most used program. Winamp and Firefox will probably also both load a song or a webpage which will not be cached. Finally, I just started firefox now and watched for, but did not see, a jump in RAM in either the task manager or some other tools. Maybe firefox just isn't being cached for you. It depends on how much RAM you have, what else is running, maybe it's indexing you, I don't know. Maybe some extension of yours is taking memory.

    5. Re:Upon further digging by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Informative

      the moment I open firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant? Because it's not already cached and Firefox is well, kind of a pig. The caches only get filled and (re)used while your computer is booted, once it crashes (or you shut it down) and you reboot, everything has to be reloaded.


      $ ps -uxaww | grep firefox
      steve 1719 29.4 -25.8 1521604 542080 ?? Ss 3Dec07 4099:18.16 /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin -foreground


      I've only had this instance of Firefox running a little more than a week - see the 3-December start date and it's taking 1.5GB of virtual memory. So sorry, but Firefox eating up system resources is not a valid criticism of Microsoft Windows Vista.
    6. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends how you define 'use' I guess.. Linux 'uses' lots of RAM too, depending on how you look at it:

                   total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
      Mem:       2075920    1984048      91872          0     226344    1573128
      -/+ buffers/cache:     184576    1891344
      Swap:      2008084       2488    2005596

    7. Re:Upon further digging by mooglez · · Score: 1

      The whole point of RAM management in Vista is to utilize your RAM as much as possible. It's always better to have stuff in RAM than to have to read it from the HD.

    8. Re:Upon further digging by feepness · · Score: 1

      What I mean is...why is it that Vista sit at idle at around ~500mb, and the moment I open firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? I The libraries that firefox uses can be cached, but the memory it asks for when it actually runs cannot. Still sounds remarkably high, but hey, it's firefox.

      Glad to help.
    9. Re:Upon further digging by evanbd · · Score: 1

      No, it shouldn't. There's two pieces here -- the executable file on disk (which is also cached in memory for speed reasons), and the memory the program is using. It's almost exactly like you took a few hundred MB of ram, decided to use it as your hard disk, and ran programs off that. Those programs still use memory normally, so when you run them ram usage jumps. In practice, of course, the amount of memory used for this varies (mostly based on how much memory you're actually using for runnings programs), and it tries to do a good job of only keeping the things that will be helpful copied into memory.

    10. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox in particular is a bad, bad example for you to use because Firefox is infamous for consuming large amounts of memory.

      What Superfetch does is cache commonly used resources, not whole applications, though Firefox will certainly start faster than if you had the service turned off. Also, Superfetch will give up some of the RAM it uses when other applications want it. I've used this example before:

      1. Let Vista idle. Personally, I get 65% memory usage or so.
      2. Go run a memory-intensive program, such as a game or video-editing software.
      3. Let it run and consume all the memory it wants to, then close it out.
      4. Your memory usage should've dropped considerably (mine literally halves).
      5. ???
      6. PROFIT!

    11. Re:Upon further digging by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 1

      If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant?

      I'm a bit simplifying here, but a program has two memory footprints: the executable itself and the variables it uses. I guess what you see is Vista caching the executable (the Firefox exe and the dlls it uses) but not the variables (it is problematic for an OS to cache those - they are, well, vary from usage to usage). Variables here can be pretty big here. A list containing all the data for each site you visit can be such a variable (I'm not saying Firefox has one, it's just an example).

    12. Re:Upon further digging by IhuntCIA · · Score: 1

      every time I open Firefox or Winamp, I see a clear jump in my RAM memory? What I mean is...why is it that Vista sit at idle at around ~500mb, and the moment I open Firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant? It seems that Vista is using a portion of RAM to pre-load most frequently used executables. This was reserved for privileged applications but on windows Vista it is a feature, and it is called superfetch. It is essentially self tuning application pre-loading disk cache.
      The problem is that executable can not be executed while in superfetch buffer, they need to be loaded to RAM. Even if most of FireFox is in superfetch buffer it must load to RAM in order to run. If You are viewing pages with the java applets, then java virtual machine is in disk cache and will be loaded to RAM too. Also since You are using WinAmp and other programs, they too are loaded into superfetch buffer taking even more RAM.
      That clears out why RAM usage jumps every time You start FireFox or WinAmp.

      I remember slightly better way to prefetch applications. In the mid '80s hard drives and RAM were expensive. Home computers had 1 megabyte of RAM or less. Most home computers had no hard drive at all, instead they had one or two floppy drives. Floppy drives are generally slow, and couldn't top more than 20 kilobytes per second. To speed up DOS scripting Commodore corporation promoted residence. Once resident executable (an program or dos command) takes slightly more RAM than it uses on disk, and can be executed as many times as it is needed without any need for (floppy) disk and launches instantaneously. Also resident executable could be removed to free RAM. Unlike superfetch, resident system took only slightly more RAM than executable would need for an operation, and disk cache or RAM could bee freed.
    13. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am sorry if I am a chemical engineer and not a EE or CS major. But if what you said is true, then the RAM usage on a perfectly new computer with Vista shouldn't used up around 500mb of RAM either, but they are. Also, if it already cache the information, then how come every time I open Firefox or Winamp, I see a clear jump in my RAM memory? What I mean is...why is it that Vista sit at idle at around ~500mb, and the moment I open firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant?"

      I'm not an expert on superfetch but...
      1. Is the laptop absolutely new (i.e. only booted once)? Superfetch tries to preload the programs it think you will load in the (near) future so that they boot faster.

      2. I don't know if Superfetch loads *ALL* of a program into memory. So when you load Fire Fox, perhaps you still see an increase in memory because modules that weren't in memory had to be loaded.

      3. Vista also has more services/applications running in the background than XP. The sidebar, indexing etc all use up memory. If you have similar services running in XP, memory usage starts to creep up too.

      Personally, I like Vista. I don't think its worth the money to upgrade - but if it "comes with" a new PC (yes, not free....but heavily discounted) or if you can get it from work through MSDN then I think it makes a good upgrade.

    14. Re:Upon further digging by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      As a longtime OS X user, I have to say, Holy Crap! Welcome to the past!
      Congratulations!

      Ah, now let's get a flood of people asking me where the right click button is...

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    15. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's not forget that if your physical memory usage is below 100%, your OS isn't efficiently using your system RAM. What's the point of having 2GB of RAM if the OS never accesses it? Yes, it should free it up when there's pressure on it, but other than that, it should be cramming as much as it can in there. I paid for the darn RAM, use it, would you?!

    16. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant? No. It's cached the program data, but it hasn't executed it at all, so it doesn't know that Firefox is going to ask for a whole lot more memory. Think of it like this: You've got all this RAM sitting around, which is great and all but only does any good if it is used for something. It's nice to see that your system has X free RAM, but that memory is idle. It's not doing any good at all. Instead of letting it sit there blank the OS does something with it. If any programs later need that memory the OS gives it up freely. So it's like "free memory", except it's actually helping speed the system up instead of being unused resources.

      Windows users have been bitching for years about how Linux "eats up so much memory", when it is really caching stuff in RAM that would otherwise sit around completely useless. It's nice to see them finally turning the question back on themselves.
    17. Re:Upon further digging by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not a bad questions, but it's pretty simple. The OS can only prefetch things that are the stable from session to session, like the program's bits on disk and loaded libraries. Any memory allocated by the program at runtime be cached, because that OS doesn't know what it's going to be.

      An example.

      Let's say I have a program that's a mere 50K on disk, but allocates 200MB of memory on startup, and fills it with data in from hardware - maybe a video capture. The O/S cannot cache the 200MB because it doesn't know what video frames your camera will send to it the next time it runs. (Well, if it did you'd have a time machine on your hands, and you'd be selling stocks or making sports bets and not posting here.)

      The best it could do is preallocate 200MB of blank space so that when it starts up, it maybe doesn't have to swap anything out, or move anything around to make room for it. But then there's 200MB you don't have for another program you are using. There are well-known trade-offs on how much free space it's good to keep around (meaning, when you have to ask for it, it's there for the taking) versus how much space it's good to use for aggressively caching. I'm sure the kernel folks at MS have run the numbers.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    18. Re:Upon further digging by Nebu · · Score: 1

      am sorry if I am a chemical engineer and not a EE or CS major. But if what you said is true, then the RAM usage on a perfectly new computer with Vista shouldn't used up around 500mb of RAM either, but they are. Also, if it already cache the information, then how come every time I open Firefox or Winamp, I see a clear jump in my RAM memory? What I mean is...why is it that Vista sit at idle at around ~500mb, and the moment I open firefox (which I have been using on a daily basis for months), it jump to around 650-700mb? If it is already cached, shouldn't it stay relatively constant?

      I don't know about your specific system configuration, but if you're interested in learning more about how Vista uses RAM, you may be interested in http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000688.html. They write:

      In previous versions of Windows, system responsiveness could be uneven. You may have experienced sluggish behavior after booting your machine, after performing a fast user switch, or even after lunch. Although too many carbohydrates might slow you down after lunch, your computer slows down for different reasons. When you're not actively using your computer, background tasks-- including automatic backup and antivirus software scans-- take this opportunity to run when they will least disturb you. These background tasks can take space in system memory that your applications were using. After you start to use your PC again, it can take some time to reload your data into memory, slowing down performance.

      SuperFetch understands which applications you use most, and preloads these applications into memory, so your system is more responsive. SuperFetch uses an intelligent prioritization scheme that understands which applications you use most often, and can even differentiate which applications you are likely to use at different times (for example, on the weekend versus during the week), so that your computer is ready to do what you want it to do. Windows Vista can also prioritize your applications over background tasks, so that when you return to your machine after leaving it idle, it's still responsive.

    19. Re:Upon further digging by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Could be they will image/snapshot (think: stealthy backup) the entire system (or, whatever they can get away with) and then just speed up subsequent monitoring by doing differential snapshots. That could explain why later on the monitoring process will be quicker.

      But, since they pulled the freebie deal, how much does it matter anymore? (aside from learning how to do stealthy snapshots to embed in the next version of ms windows?)

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    20. Re:Upon further digging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he is saying that Vista loads the app itself from the hard disk into the RAM. This would prevent the app from having to be read from the hard disk when you launch it. This sounds like a good use of what would otherwise be empty memory.

    21. Re:Upon further digging by paulius_g · · Score: 1

      The parent's parent is right! Although, only to a certain degree (meaning that it doesn't explain the fact why Vista uses so much damn memory).

      I'm currently running a Windows Vista VM with 1GB of RAM. When SuperFetch was on, it was using 574MB of RAM. I turned off the service and the usage dropped to 343MB.

      Although, I still think that 343MB of RAM is stupid for an operating system. I'll better stay with XP for my Windows stuff and with Linux and OS X for day to day desktop work.

    22. Re:Upon further digging by director_mr · · Score: 1

      The reason you would see your RAM useage jump (this is presuming the program is indeed already cached in RAM with Vista) is that Firefox itself uses RAM to cache your program useage and make itself operate faster. So the program itself is (possibly) cached so that it starts up nearly instantly, but when you DO start it, it allocates itself an additional amount of RAM to actually do tasks.

      The caching is only to prevent hitting the hard drive and slowing your experience down, not to cover all the future potential use of Ram of any individual program. That would require a HUGE amount of Ram. I have programs I use every day that use almost 2 Gigabytes of RAM. The actual programs only take up a couple hundred Megabytes though, so that's all that needs to be cached until I actually use the program.

    23. Re:Upon further digging by toddestan · · Score: 1

      From my understanding, a lot of the prefetch data does not show up as "used memory" as the memory is still available to the system. It makes sense, as that memory would instantly be available if you loaded a large picture in Photoshop or something like that. However, once you open Firefox, that memory is no longer available for anything else to grab, so it suddenly counts in the used memory category. This is also why when you add up the numbers, the amount of memory you get can be higher than the amount of memory physically installed in the computer.

    24. Re:Upon further digging by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      The pre-fetch deals with the code necessary to load the program. After the program starts, it will use more memory.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  21. 2girls1cup by AikonMGB · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would setup a dedicated box with XP on it that would just sit their with their spy software installed and 2girls1cup running on replay. Stuff it in the basement and forget about it for three months :D

    Aikon-

    1. Re:2girls1cup by byteframe · · Score: 0

      that shit is funny.

    2. Re:2girls1cup by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 1

      with their spy software installed and 2girls1cup running on replay

      oh god.. I didnt need to see that.... why do I have to be so curious and google everything I don't know about :'(

    3. Re:2girls1cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with their spy software installed and 2girls1cup running on replay

      oh god.. I didnt need to see that.... why do I have to be so curious and google everything I don't know about :'(

      Because you haven't seen 2girls1finger yet.
    4. Re:2girls1cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > why do I have to be so curious and google everything I don't know about

      Wait'll you decide to learn "the story of SWAP.AVI"! (The resulting article on SomethingAwful is safe for work. They've also recently debunked that thing that you just saw that you can't unsee.)

    5. Re:2girls1cup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit... I'm gonna go gouge out my eyes with a grapefruit spoon.

    6. Re:2girls1cup by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      2girls1finger, tubgirl, goatse, leroy jenkins. There, you are set for the afternoon.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    7. Re:2girls1cup by BigFoot48 · · Score: 1

      Why did you make me Google 2girls1cup and go to the site? Why did the video play automatically? Why did I watch it? Why did I send it to my perverted friends? Oh the humanity!

  22. Simple, you don't qualify... by Junta · · Score: 2, Informative

    They only want to spy on current users of their software, evidently. So you can get a free copy of Windows, but only if you are already running Windows. Guess they are not out to capture non-Windows users (they probably don't even fathom that concept).

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Simple, you don't qualify... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If some comes to your house and says:
      I'll give you 300 bucks, and in exchange I'll sit in the living room to see how you use furniture, and oh, btw I'll leave anytime you ask me, and you accept the offer. They aren't SPYING. Monitoring, but not spying. Now if you ask them to leave, and the sneak into a closet and monitor you from there, then it's SPYING.
      And considering Spying is unauthorized monitoring, You would be hard pressed to find any case where MS spies on you. Granted, thats a technicality, since they know perfectly well most people won't read the Eula, and if they did manage to stay awake in the attempt, wouldn't understand it to begin with.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  23. yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    2007-12-11 00:00:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.hotporn.com/
    2007-12-11 00:15:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.reallyhotporn.com/
    2007-12-11 02:15:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.hot-girl-on-girl.com/
    2007-12-11 04:30:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.hot-threesomes-with-food.com/
    2007-12-11 09:30:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.midget-cocks.com/
    2007-12-11 10:00:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.men-on-men.com/
    2007-12-11 10:15:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://google.com/?q=how+to+tell+parents+i'm+gay
    2007-12-11 10:30:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://www.men-on-men.com/
    2007-12-11 10:31:00; PROGRAM: Explorer; DOCUMENT: http://google.com/?q=how+to+remove+stains+from+wallpaper

    It's like this EVERY DAMN NIGHT!

  24. I want the bonus offer by zazenation · · Score: 1

    I'd like them to throw in the "32,768 FREE hours of AOL" disks too.
    I need to know which one I can throw farther.

  25. please, please gimme one! by surfi · · Score: 1

    ..and monitor how it decomposes on the trash

  26. More specifically... by Junta · · Score: 1

    Only recent MS OS customers. The last copy (i.e. only one I could install somewhere legally) of Windows that existed in this household was Windows 2000 (came on a system inherited from somewhere else). But, that would mean they were trying to market and have *new* customers, that's just crazy talk, companies don't want a larger customer base, no way...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  27. There's more then one catch. by fremean · · Score: 1

    Catch #1: You have to let them watch you
    Catch #2: You have to use their software (hugs linux)
    Catch #3: You have to be American.

    Now, I don't know about you lot, but I really don't care about #1 - if they can gleam useful information from my porn habits and game play time, go ahead.

    Catch #2 is more of an issue for me, cos I hate using Microsoft software

    Catch #3: Who wants to be an American? Why is my feedback any less important then an Americans feedback? Just because I say G'day at the top of my emails doesn't make my opinion that Windows/Microsoft sux any less valid.

    1. Re:There's more then one catch. by Darby · · Score: 1

      Just because I say G'day at the top of my emails doesn't make my opinion that Windows/Microsoft sux any less valid.

      Ahh, but it calls all of your opinions into question. I mean if you're saying G'day when it's really G'night, then how can you be trusted?!?

    2. Re:There's more then one catch. by servognome · · Score: 1

      Who wants to be an American? Why is my feedback any less important then an Americans feedback?
      Depends on the scope of their marketing analysis. If they are looking into the habits of users in the U.S. market and/or selling the data they collect to companies interested in American users, then yes your feedback would be less important.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    3. Re:There's more then one catch. by fremean · · Score: 1

      The problem being that 90% of software and products for American users end up being used by the rest of the world, and we might be, perhaps, getting a little tired of the limited view American users appear to have?

    4. Re:There's more then one catch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may have something to do with taxes. Seems like they would have to pay a fee on a "gift" sent to another country.

    5. Re:There's more then one catch. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Catch #3: You have to be American. This is factually incorrect. The text I read said "US Resident", I presume the long click-to-accept contract qualifies that further, but I think that if you are residing in the United States legally but your passport is not blue, you're still good to go, if that's what you really want.

      A lawyer can tell you for sure, but that's probably thrown in there so that you are guaranteed to be in US legal jurisdiction and can be prosecuted to the full extent of US law if your free copy is suddenly found flooding the streets of Beijing.
    6. Re:There's more then one catch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Catch #3: Who wants to be an American? Why is my feedback any less important then an Americans feedback? Just because I say G'day at the top of my emails doesn't make my opinion that Windows/Microsoft sux any less valid.
      Would not suprise me in the least if this is so they can join the long lines of companies selling information on Americans to the Department of Homeland Security. Being as you have to agree to the monitoring then it is doubtful that an ACLU or FSF lawsuit will be incoming. The rest of the world should be happy that your own government nor the CIA has become interested enough to talk Microsoft into giving you their software too, but then perhaps it isn't required to avoid lawsuits here.

      This may be a bit tin foil hattish, but it is something that should be thought about when allowing information about your activities to be recorded. I for one will not be signing up for this, the price is far too high. Our privacy and identities are under enough of an assault already without inviting spyware in. And yes, I do realize this could be a very innocent move to actually re-envision their software but I have had quite enough noses up my ass for one lifetime.
    7. Re:There's more then one catch. by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      Actually most Americans are just as tired of the limited view our corporations seem to have.
      Maybe some day American consumers will grow a backbone and force change, or we will start to import better stuff someone else makes and scare them into submission *hint hint*

    8. Re:There's more then one catch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The enter key and space bar work differently in Australia?

      Get over your big bad so-different-from-Americans-I'm-so-sexy! self.

    9. Re:There's more then one catch. by brown-eyed+slug · · Score: 1

      Catch #2 is more of an issue for me, cos I hate using Microsoft software
      You hate Microsoft software, so why would you even consider for a moment using some Microsoft software for a few months in order to get some free Microsoft software?

      Just because I say G'day at the top of my emails
      Ah, mystery solved! ;-)
  28. Hey Microsoft by trouser · · Score: 1

    I'll tell that what I use it for if you don't send me a copy of Vista. I'm a using it to download some porn. And I'm a using it to download some porn. And now I'm playing solitaire while I download some porn. And I'm using it to download some porn.

    --
    Now wash your hands.
  29. They'd be pretty happy, I'd think. by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're still going to count it as another person "using" Vista. I'm guessing they'd be pretty happy. I can see the marketing spin now. "Even a skeptic like Jared found that the Vista user experience was extremely satisfying."

    1. Re:They'd be pretty happy, I'd think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      brilliantly funny.
      thank you = )

  30. My thought process was as such... by definate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Something FREE! That's good!

    Vista Ultimate? That's bad!

    Monitoring? That's bad!

    Can I downgrade it to Windows XP Pro and get a free Windows XP Pro license that's legit? That'd be good! ...

    Just seems you can't even give Vista away.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:My thought process was as such... by nuggetman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take this OS, but beware, it contains monitoring software.
      That's bad.
      But it comes with a free legitimate license!
      That's good!
      The legitimate license also contains monitoring software.
      That's bad.
      But you get your choice of XP or Vista!
      That's good!
      There are no more copies of XP, only Vista. .....That's bad.
      Can I go now?

      --
      ...and that's all there is to it.
    2. Re:My thought process was as such... by falconcy · · Score: 1

      Even if you did agree to it, notice that it is only available in the good ol US of A, yet being flaunted here on the WORLD wide web by Microsoft, a company that claims to have world wide operations. Does this smell of DMCA and it's jurisdiction?

    3. Re:My thought process was as such... by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      It also contains potassium benzoate... that's bad...

    4. Re:My thought process was as such... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      notice that it is only available in the good ol US of A It only said "resident" not citizen. Aliens in another country are governed by the laws of they nation they reside in and I presume that's an anti-piracy sort of thing. If they send a copy to Pirate Wu, Chinese citizen living in Beijing they have no legal recourse. If they send a copy to Pirate Wu, Chinese citizen living in San Francisco with long term residence visa, they can maul him.

      After recent events in Europe with regards to the ISO standards committees, it could also be an "in your face" sort of thing, but that would only be "an icing on the cake" compared to the piracy and legal jurisdiction matter. I think Microsoft is technically incompetent, not stupid or evil in the business sense, and my bet is on piracy.

      Does this smell of DMCA and it's jurisdiction? Duh.
    5. Re:My thought process was as such... by falconcy · · Score: 1

      The problem with the piracy angle is that it is not just a global issue, it happens in the States too, even with draconian legislation and a litigation culture.

    6. Re:My thought process was as such... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      The problem with the piracy angle is that it is not just a global issue, A major problem with this site is that posting history is truncated ... so I"ll repost what I've written before.

      I've lived in the Philippines since 2003. Most (nearly all) Filipinos do not own computers. Internet cafes are big business, but on very low margin (pennies an hour in gross receipts). I haven't seen any non-pirated Microsoft Windows installations in Internet cafes the whole time.

      The "problem" is worse in China, from what I've been told and observed myself.

      GMA is heavily into Bush butt-kissing to save her failed Presidency and is promoting anti-piracy campaigns in what I presume is appeasement to the massive flock of vultures swooping overhead Malacanang. Philippine Presidents always turn to the US for support in times of desperation whether the help is there or not. A Microsoft Windows XP license was about P8000 (US$175) when I was last in a computer store two months ago, don't know how that's changed - the US Dollar has lost over 10% of its value versus the Peso since) and that's about a full month's salary (before taxes) for a highly paid professional.

      Microsoft's recent additions to their registration program indicate that it is pursuing additional anti-piracy measures. Laws, draconian or otherwise don't trump basic economics.
    7. Re:My thought process was as such... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I doubt it is anti piracy, giving someone a copy which will presumablly have a retail style key isn't going to help the pirates much.

      I suspect the reasons are more likely either regulatory (have to be carefull about varying privacy laws) or they simply want to study the american market only.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:My thought process was as such... by LinuxDon · · Score: 1

      Quote: "Can I downgrade it to Windows XP Pro and get a free Windows XP Pro license that's legit? That'd be good! ..."

      Yes, with vista business and higher you have the right to downgrade to Windows XP Pro.
      At work we purchase all our new PC's with Vista business and then just downgrade them to Windows XP Pro.

      It will be cheaper to migrate to windows Vista in two years or so (In case I ever feel like doing so).

    9. Re:My thought process was as such... by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Your post reminded me on this:

      Homer tells the owner that he is looking for a present for his son's birthday. The owner hands to him a talking Krusty doll.

      Owner: Take this object, but beware it carries a terrible curse!
      Homer: [worried] Ooooh, that's bad.
      Owner: But it comes with a free Frogurt!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The Frogurt is also cursed.
      Homer: [worried] That's bad.
      Owner: But you get your choice of topping!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The toppings contains Potassium Benzoate.
      Homer: [stares]
      Owner: That's bad.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    10. Re:My thought process was as such... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Yes, with vista business and higher you have the right to downgrade to Windows XP Pro.
      That is for OEM versions.

      Full retail and retail upgrade do not come with downgrade rights.

      IIRC volume licenses come with downgrade rights to XP pro, 2K pro, 98, NT 4 and 95.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  31. Beta Tester anyone? by terrible76 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like its not free, but a way to save money instead of paying someone to test the software bugs. Give it away and just don't call it Beta testing. I think its more complicated and business wise then just spyware.

  32. Simple, you don't mingle well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Guess they are not out to capture non-Windows users (they probably don't even fathom that concept)."

    Don't worry. Your "guantanamo" is coming soon enough.

  33. So, no changes... by lnxpilot · · Score: 1

    "The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program."

    ???

    They've been doing that all along.

    There have been countless cases and articles of M$ spying on Windows users, so what's new?

    Uhm, that they're now doing it *openly*?

  34. comScore not good by interiot · · Score: 1

    Note that the site mentions that comScore is part of the Windows Feedback Program. ("Microsoft, comScore, and MarketTools employees are not eligible to participate.") Also note that comScore has in the past been involved in very pernicious man-in-the-middle HTTPS attacks that have allowed them to sniff bank passwords (and everything else, of course) by installing a special certificate in end-user's browsers. If it were me, I wouldn't install any executables that may have been authored by comScore until there's been enough time for them to be thoroughly vetted by independent third parties.

  35. Free Beta by embsysdev · · Score: 1

    I've given away software to beta testers too, but shouldn't a program released a year ago be out of beta by now? ;)

    But seriously, I'm glad they are soliciting feedback for improving the user experience. Maybe the next update will have fewer distractions.

  36. Catch number 2 by vikstar · · Score: 1

    Only available to about 4% of the population, ie, you have to be a US citizen.

    --
    The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
  37. Alright, so they're watching you. by Zorque · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least it's completely voluntary and you make ~$400 off of it. Why are people getting upset that Microsoft is paying you for providing them with information? It's not like it's mandatory for Windows users.

    1. Re:Alright, so they're watching you. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Because it's Microsoft. There's always a way for /. to spin anything they do negatively.

  38. I'll get modded troll for this, but still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not forcing anyone to do this. What you guys don't understand is that there are many people in this world who consider their privacy to mean nothing, Microsoft at least considers it to be equal a copy of their software. I'm sure that many slashdotters would say it's ok for girls to sell their bodies, but computer users selling their privacy, oh noes...

  39. We can now officially say by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    ...that Vista is so bad Microsoft had to give it away to get people to use it.

    1. Re:We can now officially say by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      not only that, they had to make sure you're using it, by monitoring you.

    2. Re:We can now officially say by zegota · · Score: 1

      Unlike Linux, you mean?

  40. Hide your own definitions...use exclamation points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "They're basically looking at everything you do. "

    Only if you redefine "everything" for moderation purposes.

  41. Make it productive. by rantingkitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not install this on a couple VMs (or actual machines sitting around) and then install all kinds of free software on it? Let them chew on the fact that so many people, straight away after installing, go get Firefox and Open Office and GIMP and VLC and Thunderbird and Pidgin.. and never bother using IE or Office or whatever else. Make sure they also see all the useless services you disable and how quickly you can shut off UAC.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    1. Re:Make it productive. by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Or, I could install those things and *not* tell them. Honestly? Is it really all the entertaining to go out of your way to give them this data? (and you are assuming that they don't already know anyway).

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
  42. Impossible to unsubscribe by FliesLikeABrick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried to sign up so that I could run my free XP in a virtual machine with this spy software of theirs and see exactly what kind of stuff it reports. I didn't realize they were out of "gifts" and completed their survey before realizing this. I went through the survey and answered their questions honestly, saying that I use Linux and never use Windows anymore. 5 minutes later, I wanted to remove myself from their database for this so that I don't get e-mails in the future related to it when I have no involvement with it whatsoever... being that they had no more software to give out and all.

    I looked on their FAQ page and found conflicting information. Two separate sections saying to send a blank e-mail to two different e-mail addresses with 'remove' in the subject. I e-mailed both, and what did I get in return?

    I did that. What did I get back? Two NDRs for separate reasons:

    : host maila.microsoft.com[131.107.115.212] said: 550
            5.7.1 (in reply to end of DATA command)

    -- and --

    : host maila.microsoft.com[131.107.115.212] said: 550
            5.1.1 User unknown (in reply to RCPT TO command)

    Good one MS, you never cease to amaze me!

    1. Re:Impossible to unsubscribe by FliesLikeABrick · · Score: 1

      Er, that second one should be
      : host mailc.microsoft.com[205.248.106.32] said: 550
              5.7.1 (in reply to end of DATA command)

    2. Re:Impossible to unsubscribe by FliesLikeABrick · · Score: 1

      Ok, even though I submit this as plaintext it parses things between brackets as html tags. For the bounces, see http://scarecrow.puttynuts.com/~ryan/ms-what-a-surprise.txt

    3. Re:Impossible to unsubscribe by jrumney · · Score: 1

      So did you try resending without the obscene language?

    4. Re:Impossible to unsubscribe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my grandmother gasps when I say Linux too!

  43. While I agree... by Junta · · Score: 1

    That putting this up as a program isn't horrible so long as it is totally voluntary and glaringly obvious (though saying 'it's not spyware' in a faq answer is kind of disingenuous') However, saying you make ~$400 off of it is not a good characterization. First off, $400 is the MSRP of Vista Ultimate retail box, without upgrade. If you can participate in this program, first you'd likely be qualified for the upgrade cost. Secondly, OEM pricing is an option if not intending to 'upgrade' your current system (you'd be making a new one, fair chance). Putting all that aside, there are handfuls of ways to get Vista for 'free' or at least for less (i.e. the marketing programs that offer Vista as the free gift).

    Simply, there is a good chance the user never would have possibly paid $400, and if someone actually wants Vista, there are plenty of less than blatantly obvious ways to acquire it legally without that money paid. Plus, with all the questionable press reception Vista has received, it's in Microsoft's best interest to give out the software as they can under whatever pretense they can. This way, they preserve the commercial image and pricing, but expand the market share.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  44. I'm not outraged by pat+mcguire · · Score: 1

    On any given installation of Windows, there are going to be multiple processes reporting back to various organizations about your usage habits - it's simply a result of the insecure nature of the operating system that no installation can escape unscathed. That said, a program that is installed with my permission to return non-user-specific information in exchange for a four hundred dollar piece of software is quite the anomaly. However, do you think the alternative to this is for them not to collect the information? No, it would be to simply put it in unannounced during a Windows update and put it in the Terms of Use that you don't read and that they can change without notifying you. If maybe this isn't quite doing the Right Thing(TM), it's certainly much much better than the alternatives.

  45. A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Asmor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Glad to see that you guys don't let facts get in the way of a good MS bash.

    Anyways, just in the in case there's anyone actually curious about this and not just interested in kneejerk reactions about poorly-written, inflammatory summary.

    I've actually RTFA (and a page linked off of it) and here's something the summary completely neglects to mention:

    The automated data collection is one of two different options you can pick; the other is to be asked to fill out a survey not more often than once every two weeks. It sounds like you can pick either option.

    Now, that all said, there's also one more big thing: They're giving away FREE copies of EXPENSIVE software* which many people NEED** or WANT with a perfectly reasonable caveat. They're being open and honest, and they're providing both a manual and an automatic method of data collection. The latter is particularly appealing to many, because it basically means they can just forget about it. Those who are worried about their privacy can take the surveys.

    Disclaimer: I am a fanboy of many things, including Xbox 360, but not Microsoft in general. I like Windows XP and hate most everything that MS has put out which isn't an OS (i.e. office, internet explorer, etc). I'll definitely not be participating simply because I'm not interested in any of the offerings.

    *Expensive for a typical end user, I don't care how much your company paid for its graphics design software
    **Again, typical end user who doesn't know what OpenOffice is and just wants to be able to open their files at work without thinking about converting file types.

    1. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Now, that all said, there's also one more big thing: They're giving away FREE copies of EXPENSIVE software* which many people NEED** or WANT with a perfectly reasonable caveat. They're being open and honest, and they're providing both a manual and an automatic method of data collection. The latter is particularly appealing to many, because it basically means they can just forget about it. Those who are worried about their privacy can take the surveys.

      More EXPENSIVE does not automatically mean MORE COVETED, or more NEEDED or WANTED. Take a look at this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ATeLDM1H4M

      Its not even worth pirating Vista... or apply to use the damn thing for free.

      Besides, will this free version be usable without being connected to the internet atleast once a week? I doubt it. The moment it is connected to the 'net; privacy for the user is only a pretence.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      The automated data collection is one of two different options you can pick; the other is to be asked to fill out a survey not more often than once every two weeks. It sounds like you can pick either option.


      Wrong. You have to fill out a 15 minute questionnaire up front, then download and install the software.
      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    3. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Asmor · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I'm bothering to reply to you, since it's obvious you didn't read a damn word I said except for the capitalized ones.

      You're right that being expensive does not equate to being desired or necessary, and I never said it did.

      All I said was that many people do need or want Microsoft software, and the expense of that software is thus a salient point to make.

      Also, as mentioned, they are offering you options, and you're not required to use their monitoring software to participate.

      Now, if you'd like to have an intelligent discussion about the issue, that's wonderful. Otherwise, please go return to your hole and both me no longer.

    4. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm doubting you, but could you provide a reference to back that up? I didn't see anything suggesting that. Of course, I also didn't see anything saying that you'd get the software which the summary claims you will, so I'm obviously missing something. :)

    5. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I took the survey (I'm a sucker for this kind of thing, free cds, free games, free smiley icons for my email, etc) and chose only the survey option. It appears as though you only get the software and licenses if you choose to install their monitoring software;but if you choose the first option all you get is a link to participate in a survey on your level of computer experience/literacy, marketing factors (eg does 'brand' influence your purchasing decisions) and how you use mobile technologies.

    6. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you joined it too late. According to a microsoft email posted on this site they "ran out" of free gifts -ie they are no longer offering any downloads.

      Free smileys? Enjoy your AIDS^H^H^H^H trojans.

    7. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by bit01 · · Score: 1

      Glad to see that you guys don't let facts get in the way of a good MS bash.

      This is not a bash. This is humor. Learn to tell the difference and to cope with alternative points of view.

      In particular just because some comment doesn't conform to M$ marketing's incredibly narrow propaganda view of the world doesn't mean the comment is invalid.

      Disclaimer: I am a fanboy of many things, including Xbox 360, but not Microsoft in general. I like Windows XP and hate most everything that MS has put out which isn't an OS (i.e. office, internet explorer, etc). I'll definitely not be participating simply because I'm not interested in any of the offerings.

      This disclaimer is meaningless. A valid one might be: Disclaimer: I am not paid directly or indirectly by MS.

      ---

      Astroturfing "marketers" are liars, fraudulently misrepresenting company propaganda as objective third party opinion.

    8. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Anyways, just in the in case there's anyone actually curious about this and not just interested in kneejerk reactions about poorly-written, inflammatory summary. You insensitive clod! I'm a kdawson fan!
    9. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've actually RTFA

      noob

    10. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Prune · · Score: 1

      hate most everything that MS has put out which isn't an OS

      What about Visual Studio? I'd say that's Microsoft's best product, and the major product they make that has no competitors of similar quality.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    11. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      This disclaimer is meaningless. A valid one might be: Disclaimer: I am not paid directly or indirectly by MS.

      Can you back up that comment? Can you actually prove, with data, that there are posters on Slashdot that are paid by Microsoft to write postings like that? Or are you just shoveling bullshit?

      If you can't prove the accusation, don't make it. Of course, the very fact that I'm skeptical means I'm probably paid by Microsoft, right?

    12. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      I walked through the questionnaire myself, which was followed by "install the software." No other options. Unfortunately, my computer is in no condition to run that software, else I would install it and report further.

      You're right about the other part, no reference to the free software, at least not as far down the process as I got.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    13. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free software offer was already gone by the time this was posted.

      Pretty funny that you claim to have read the article, but you didn't notice that minor issue. Instead, you chose to rant about how great MSFT is for doing something that they had already announced they aren't doing.

      Fanboy much? Nah, of course not. You're just a Microsoft connoisseur. Am I right?

    14. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Asmor · · Score: 1

      It never even occurred to me that someone might accuse me of being an astroturfer.

      Very well, I am also in absolutely no way associated with Microsoft.

    15. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Like I said, most everything. :) For what it's worth, I had completely forgot about Visual Studio, which I use at work, at school, and the express edition at home.

    16. Re:A fair look from a Microsoft-neutral observer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're being open and honest, and they're providing both a manual and an automatic method of data collection. The latter is particularly appealing to many, because it basically means they can just forget about it. Those who are worried about their privacy can take the surveys.
      You have to do both to get the free software.
  46. Saw this a few days ago and took a long hard look. by dzd-n-confused · · Score: 1

    Then I was like hell no. They allow themselves to monitor basically everything on your computer processes, favorites, patches, cdkey Its just like nasty keyloggers and spyware except its from microsoft. I pass I like my private information away from them.

  47. Just wait 90 days... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1


    ...and after only 3,283 people sign up, we'll finally have the proof that...

    ...Microsoft can't -- give -- Vista away.

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Just wait 90 days... by Cheeze · · Score: 1

      Foot in Mouth.

      2000 people signed up. What did that double Vista's userbase???!

      --
      Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  48. Geez... Such Cynical People by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't believe all the cynical responses from Slashdot readers. Why would you doubt the sincerity and generosity of the company found by the man who will donate $100 to an orphanage each time I forward his email to someone?

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Geez... Such Cynical People by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      But I heard he went on Oprah and was bragging about how he is proud to be a member of the Church of Satan!

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    2. Re:Geez... Such Cynical People by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Actually it's me donating the $100, if not to an orphanage. Every time I receive an email forward, I like to "donate" $100 to a hitman to hunt down and kill whoever keeps sending me the asinine emails.

      It's the least I could do.

  49. Deal by TBerben · · Score: 1

    I'm actually tempted to take the offer. We have two (legal) XP installs here, one of which is on my pc. The only reason why I haven't formatted it into oblivion yet is because I can't get Civilization IV to run on Linux even though every forum online says it should. I'm more than happy to have them monitor my Civ victories and as a bonus, I'll browse the web for an hour using firefox, check my mail using thunderbird and draw them a nice cartoon using the Gimp. Heck I'll even install Cygwin! Then at the end of the three months I'll use the Debian w32 installer...

  50. Tactic to gain more ground? by KillzoneNET · · Score: 1

    I have to admit that I'd be one of people openly against Vista until I received it for free after doing something similar to this. I've come to believe that the only reason people are so openly against it is that they have little to gain from spending so much for something that in their view is a relatively small upgrade over XP. I for one would of never gotten Vista if it weren't for it being free, and now I actually prefer it over XP many times over.

    1. Re:Tactic to gain more ground? by tknd · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not a tactic to gain ground. It is a strategy commonly used to gain survey information. It is exactly like how you will often see a survey that says, "Get a chance at winning an ipod after completing this survey" kind of deals.

      Why would Microsoft need to conduct a survey that requires generating statistics on how you use your computer? Simple, it is to determine usability statistics. That type of data can then be used to influence the design of the user interface.

      For example if the data shows that for a particular window in say the control panel, the most user's mouse movement is dramatically higher than with some other window, that means that the window with high mouse movement is a candidate for reorganization. That is because the longer you take to move your mouse, the less efficient you are.

      You can also see what functions your users are using the most and what functions they rarely use. So say you have a toolbar with 10 buttons and out of those 10 buttons only 2 are used by almost everyone while the other 8 are rarely touched. This suggests that you may want to make those 2 functions that are used always to be more accessible either with a hotkey or by making those specific buttons bigger so they are easier to click and you may want to evaluate if the other 8 buttons are even worth having there. Likewise if you see people always using the menu functions rather than using the toolbar buttns you may want to investigate why this is or consider labeling the buttons.

      Big software companies including Microsoft typically conduct in-person usability tests. But these types of tests can only go so far. That's probably why they are turning to these larger usability tests so they can get more general data about the greater population rather than a small set of people they can get into their labs.

      For the uninformed in-person usability tests work as follows: You have a piece of software that you want to evaluate the usability of. To test how usable it is, you come up with a list of tasks for the user to do, like say open their email software and write a hello email to their buddy, or say deleting files named "a", "b", and "c". After you have the tasks you want your user to perform, you people unrelated to the project with varying degrees of knowledge about computers and your software to perform each task. As they attemp the task, your objective is to observer--that is you don't tell them anything even if they are obviously having issues getting the task completed or even if they ask you a question about how to do it. You simply tell them what they're supposed to do and watch, and if they look at you and give up, you say "that's fine" and just note that they were not able to complete the task.

      The results of usability testing are pretty amazing for first time usability observers even for some very simple tasks with common software and gadgets. You will also recognize that there are lots of moments where people just sit there and do nothing, times when they keep repeating actions, and times when they keep clicking on something because they think it does something but it doesn't. Some really simple tasks also will show many users all with different ways of accomplishing it. For example if you delete a file how many ways are there to delete it? Well one way is to drag the file to the recycle bin. Another way is to click on it and hit the delete key. Another way is to right-click it and use the context menu delete option. And yet another way is to first open your trash bin and then drag the file to the opened trash bin. All of these ways are valid and I'm willing to bet there will be even a few more ways of deleting files that you'd never have thought of (besides the rm command).

      The nice thing about in-person usability testing (as I just described) is that you can ask questions and probe for information about what the person is thinking while they're doing the task. Normally you ask them to think out loud so you can get an idea of what's going on in their mind.

    2. Re:Tactic to gain more ground? by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      My favorite story about usability testing came from "Ask Tog", one of the original UI designers of the Mac OS (pre-OSX). The challenge was getting users to fill out a web-based form, and dealing with the possibility that their web browser might not be maximized. They went through a torturous set of steps to make sure that all levels of users knew how to maximize their web browser.

      http://www.asktog.com/columns/000maxscrns.html

  51. I could do this... by master5o1 · · Score: 0

    Do completely random stuff, install as much free non MS software (GPL, Mozilla etc) and do things that they would never expect. Then download a Linux ISO of some sort while making lots of documents as ".doc" in Word where the main thing is saying Linux is so much better. View mainly Linux sites, and so on... Basically shove it in their wistle-area :P

    --
    signature is pants
  52. The Catch by popo · · Score: 3, Funny


    "The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program"

    So they'll monitor my activities when I sell it on eBay?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  53. Under Wine.... by themacks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Out of morbid curiosity I had to know, and it installed just fine. Thankfully it uninstalled just fine too.

    I wonder what kind of "useful" data Wine reports...

    --
    i read about it in a blog once
  54. Free as in beer? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    "The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program."

    So how does this make the free copy any different than the one you pay for? Just askin'.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  55. How they monitor your usage by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

    Probably the same technology that Bill developed for tracking the forwarding of email!

  56. ...let them monitor by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    Great! I want my copy of office for use in interior of Mexico about 750 miles away from the nearest network connection. Monitor me all you like.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  57. Tomorrow's headline... by aeSentinel · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Satan is giving away free money. The caveat is that you have to give him your soul.

    1. Re:Tomorrow's headline... by rgoldste · · Score: 1

      I'll take him up on that. IAAL, so he's getting the raw end of the deal :)

    2. Re:Tomorrow's headline... by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      And this is how we find out lawyers aren't born evil; they become evil by making really bad deals.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    3. Re:Tomorrow's headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, where do I sign up?

  58. Thanks Microsoft by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Funny
    Thanks for the laugh, Oh man that FAQ is a riot. Highlights:

    What am I agreeing to do?
    To participate, you will need to agree to allow Microsoft to gather and record information about the use of your home computer on an ongoing basis. By agreeing to voluntarily participate in the Windows Feedback Program, you agree that:

    * You will abide by all terms stated and referred to in the Terms of Use and Notices ("Agreement"), including granting Microsoft a license to use your data and feedback.
    * You will install software provided to you by Microsoft to facilitate and allow data to be recorded, transmitted, and used by Microsoft.
    * You will be invited to participate in occasional online surveys.

    Then this one.

    Will I be able to see what data I'm sharing with you?
    Unfortunately, you will not be able to look at your specific data. We designed the Windows Feedback Program software specifically to avoid any interference with your work or how your computer functions. To do that, the data you are sharing is stored in a binary format (zeros and ones) rather than in text format. Storing the data in binary format makes it very small and easy to share with us, but difficult for you to translate and interpret.

    Stop it, I'm gonnan pee. This one

    Does my shared data have a unique identifier? Yes, we have a unique identifier for your data. This allows us to tell between one customer having an error 100 times and 100 customers having the same error once. Being able to make that distinction is very valuable in prioritizing how we improve our products.

    Ooh, almost forgot my favorite

    Can I install the WFP software on more than one Windows computer?
    Yes, the software can be installed on multiple computers and registered using the same e-mail you provided.

    This whole thing just feels .....right, you know. I'll do it!

    HaHahaHAHaHAhaaHAhaHAahaa!

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Thanks Microsoft by zenkonami · · Score: 1

      What am I agreeing to do?
      To participate, you will need to agree to allow Microsoft to gather and record information about the use of your home computer on an ongoing basis. By agreeing to voluntarily participate in the Windows Feedback Program, you agree that:

      * You will abide by all terms stated and referred to in the Terms of Use and Notices ("Agreement"), including granting Microsoft a license to use your data and feedback.
      * You will install software provided to you by Microsoft to facilitate and allow data to be recorded, transmitted, and used by Microsoft.
      * You will be invited to participate in occasional online surveys. Wait a minute...

      Does my shared data have a unique identifier?
      Yes, we have a unique identifier for your data. This allows us to tell between one customer having an error 100 times and 100 customers having the same error once. Being able to make that distinction is very valuable in prioritizing how we improve our products. Is it just me, or does this sound like a BETA test to anyone else?

      --

      Do You Experiment?
  59. I sent them an email... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

    Trying to game them into giving me the copy of Ultimate. I very much want to sit there and let them watch all their usual spyware get ripped out of the registry.

    Or possibly just complain that it won't run on my 256 meg PIII that 'runs Debian just fine'.

    Or... well, the list is endless.

    --
    Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
  60. Be Helpful by Propaganda13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd use it to read http://annoyances.org/. I'd go around editing the registry and fixing common annoyances. Hopefully, Microsoft would realize what they need to fix.

  61. I'd be glad to help. by rbowles · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, since I have no desire, need or intention of running Vista (until a game warrants it) or any "office/secretarial" applications, the install media wouldn't get any use (except as maybe a coffee mug coaster). My mind reels thinking about the usage report: "User #43912, Month one: Vista DVD aided in the delivery of 90 large mugs of sumatran dark roast coffee and 60 double espressos. Office DVD successfully extinguished 25 cigars."

    --
    /* MAGIC THEATRE
    ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
    MADMEN ONLY */
  62. I wish I noticed who posted this story by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    That way I would have known it was a MS shill trying to get people to go through the setup tool and not realizing that MS stopped giving anything away 6.5 hours BEFORE this was posted.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I wish I noticed who posted this story by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      It appeared on Slickdeals.net, Fark.com, etc. Microsoft got a huge amount of traffic really really fast for a program they probably didn't expect it on. Give them a break.

  63. Satellite? by alexandre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How would they monitor me playing frisbee with it? :]

  64. Actually not too bad of a deal... by SiriusStarr · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is actually not too bad of a deal for one not concerned about their privacy. I can see educational institutions, businesses, or low-income individuals welcoming monetarily-free software. Besides, it beats them just implementing a feedback system regardless and still charging you $300 for the software.

    --
    Fear the penguin.
  65. I'll take that deal by Rai · · Score: 1

    But I don't see what monitoring hours and hours of porn surfing is gonna do for them.

    1. Re:I'll take that deal by rbowles · · Score: 1

      Maybe studying "adult viewing habits" is the real hidden agenda here.

      --
      /* MAGIC THEATRE
      ENTRANCE NOT FOR EVERYBODY
      MADMEN ONLY */
    2. Re:I'll take that deal by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Until they decided that person you are looking at might be under 18.
      Then they call the feds who in turn decided to question you. Naturally by this point you ARE a child pornographer so they turn your life upside down looking for anything that might get a jury to convict you for anything at all. Meanwhile tyour name is smeared all over the newspapers, and you are convicted in the court of public option.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. Ummm... NO by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Either:
    A) MS will make some drastic changes to boost Vista. Like remove DRM
    or
    B) MS will go back to XP and continue selling that until they try yet again at a new OS.

    The failure Of Bob and ME didn't exactly stop them, and neither will the failure of Vista.

    Consider how much money MS has sunk on Office for Vista, there may be a chance they just Give Vista away in order to maintain there desktop office monopoly. I don't have high hopes.

    Now, I run Win2K because XP brings me exactly nothing. I just can't see paying 100 bucks for nothing..for an OS. I have dropped 100 bucks at craps. Hell, nearly took me 60 seconds!

    Now, Vista Ultimate does have some davatages for me..but not enough. It would need to be 100 bucks or less, and have no DRM.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Ummm... NO by penix1 · · Score: 1

      A) MS will make some drastic changes to boost Vista. Like remove DRM


      That won't happen because of the contracts they signed with the MAFIAA. Nothing like being in breech of contract to piss off the MAFIAA enough for them to send Vinny around to break some kneecaps. In fact, Microsoft is tightening up DRM in Vista.

      B) MS will go back to XP and continue selling that until they try yet again at a new OS.


      You must have missed the memo that Microsoft is running out of XP Product Keys.
      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    2. Re:Ummm... NO by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      did you actually read the article you linked?! MS was running low on keys so they put out a version that accepted more. No big deal.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:Ummm... NO by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      I reckon we look out for Windows XP/Vx (XP - Vista Experience) as a reaction to the XP/Vista dilemma - and we should all pray it does not turn out like Windows Me.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:Ummm... NO by stevie.f · · Score: 1

      The company that I work at is getting increasingly frustrated with Microsoft products and had briefly been considering switching to Linux. We are currently using XP but will eventually have to move to Vista, which will mean massive spending on hardware. There are probably 100 PCs here that wouldn't be able to run Vista (and are struggling with XP), as well as another 200 that might be able to do it. Linux is not a viable option at the moment as there are not equivalent applications available at the moment, however this will be considered again when the next OS is forced upon us. Microsoft really has to work to make their next release as polished as possible, or customers may well start moving away as opposed to just considering it. I wouldn't mind waiting longer and paying these kind of prices for the next OS if it felt like I was getting something extra (and the powers that be at work agree), or even something finished. We couldn't use it for free, and don't particularly want to use it at all, so what is Microsoft giving businesses? After all, those are the biggest customers

    5. Re:Ummm... NO by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Actually I run XP on my Windows boxes for exactly one reason : as of about three years ago, Win2K didn't play nice with Hyperthreaded chips. Evidently the no-op spinner would freak out on HT chips making utilization go crazy, or something - I don't remember the details. XP Pro cooperated nicely with Intel Hyperthreaded CPUs, so I decided up upgrade.

      Since then I occasionally go back to a Win2K box and have issues getting USB 2.0 to work (works fine with 1.1, but that's a really, really slow implementation compared to high speed 2.0) but if I'm on a single CPU machine and don't have any high speed USB devices I need to drive - it's a flying system on hardware that would seriously underperform on XP (and would choke and die on Vista.)

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    6. Re:Ummm... NO by AusIV · · Score: 1

      MS will make some drastic changes to boost Vista. Like remove DRM

      The DRM is on the content, not the operating system. Windows Vista enforces restrictions required by the content owners. If MS removed DRM, that means the content would no longer be available, and I can hardly see "You won't be able to watch HD-DVD or BluRay Disks!" as a selling point.

    7. Re:Ummm... NO by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      MS will make some drastic changes to boost Vista. Like remove DRM

      FFS, give it up already. DRM is a non-argument. The only people who consider it important are zealots and the ignoramuses they've convinced with their FUD.

      If you don't have DRM-encumbered media, it's irrelevant because it never activates. If you *do* have DRM-encumbered media, Vista isn't applying any more restrictions than any other device capable of playing it, and the alternative is not being able to play said media at all. Either way, the Vista's DRM support simply does not matter, because you either never see it, or have to use it.

  67. They WERE giving away free Vista by TNTSoggy · · Score: 1

    As of 2pm Pacific time they reached there "while supplies last" limit. I tried to get myself a copy after I realized that although I don't much like them snooping, I don't do or have anything on my computer that needs to be kept under lock and key. That being said I signed up, filled out there survey, and installed there spyware only to realize that there was no longer any free vista. basically M$oft did a bait and switch, allowing reputable sites to post links and get there members a few copies before they turned off the incentive and racked in the free guinea pigs. I have sent them an E-mail stating my displeasure with there tactics and the complete failure to notify anyone that the incentive was over. I have demanded that they ether give me my free copy of vista or delete all data collected from me and my computer. Hopefully there corporate pansyness will shine through and I'll get a copy.

  68. Your Rights Online? by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what, I shouldn't have the right to voluntarily enter in to this sort of an agreement with a company? They shouldn't have the right to invite people to do so?

    Help me out here guys, I'm trying to see what right is involved.

  69. The finally realize the product's value! by DougReed · · Score: 1

    Gee Microsoft finally realizes that Vista is about as useful as an AOL CD.

  70. who wants it anyway? by wikinerd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who wants MS software anyway? Even if it's free, when there are alternatives such as Debian, MS can't compete. Hell, MS software comes by force with most laptops and prebuilt PCs (and usually you can't ask for a no-software machine... it comes by force in the meaning of "you either buy it as it is or don't buy it at all"), MS software is full of annoyances (clipper!) and bugs and is the central target of all crackers worldwide. It's okay to get MS Windows on a laptop and leave it there as dual-boot with a GNU/Linux distro just in case you ever need to run something on real Windows. But wanting to buy something made by MS or even wanting MS software for free is pure psychopathology.

  71. Fine, let them monitor... by vistic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll freak MS out by doing nothing with ULTIMATE Office except try to open OpenOffice documents all day long.

  72. Giving Away Free... WHAT? by o0OSABO0o · · Score: 1

    I read the entire web site [http://wfp.microsoft.com] you reference in your posting and I cannot find anything about Microsoft giving away free Vista or Office 2007. Where did you come up with that tag line? The only thing they are "giving away" is the monitoring software.

    --
    The Spice Must Flow!
  73. I never thought I would run Vista by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    But I would take them up on this. I'd set up an old computer I don't use, run Vista Ultimate on it, and point it straight to Goatse in hopes of catching an unwary newbie.

  74. No free software by john_p_peach · · Score: 4, Informative
    The agreement that you read says the M$ will provide all the software for free. However, after you find out

    What happened to the free product option? Thank you for your interest in the feedback program. Due to overwhelming response, the supply of gifts has been exhausted so we have closed our free product offer on 12/11/2007 at 2pm Pacific Time. Thanks to everyone that participated!
    Surprise surprise microsoft is being misleading. Also, the FAQ says that in order to opt-out you just send a message to winsurv@microsoft.com but when you do the message bounces with

    I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out. : 205.248.106.30 does not like recipient. Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 User unknown Giving up on 205.248.106.30.
    So you cannot ever get out of the programme after you find out that microsoft was screwed you.
    1. Re:No free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I joined the program early on, I will be getting Office 2007 (as I already have Vista Ultimate). Also, to remove yourself, just delete the program. You will automatically be removed after some time if your computer does not communicate with Microsoft, also if you ignore the surveys, you will be dropped.

    2. Re:No free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It did not "bounce" but it did not "like recipient". Anything against users?

    3. Re:No free software by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      The truly amusing part is that what you posted appears to be a NDR from qmail. I know if I were working at MS, I'd be downright embarrassed to have an smtp server running anything other than Exchange.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    4. Re:No free software by john_p_peach · · Score: 1

      The NDR is from qmail but it is from my server which ofcoarse does not run anything but linux. The error message is from my server telling me that the message could not be sent. It is not a bounce from MS's server. However, it would be really funny if they where running linux.... if they need stability, security and reliability it would be the obvious choice :)

  75. This information includes, but is not limited to by bakreule · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was interested in it, just because I believe that MS collects information on me anyway when I use Windows, so why not get a free copy?

    From the privacy statement fineprint, they say what information they are collecting.

    "This information includes, but is not limited to:"

    Then they give a list of "harmless" things such as driver types, hardware, errors encountered. But where is the "not limited to" list? Can't find it on the site. They really don't want you to know what they are collecting.

    And, of course, Office has its own set of things, which you helpfully have to look for yourself:

    To display the privacy statement for Office 2003, please search for "Privacy Statement" in Office 2003 online help.

    Plus, the Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program has its own set of things it collects.

    Very Big Brother. Then again, most of my information is already out there floating around... Might be nice to have a free copy of Vista.....

    --

    Buses stop at a bus station
    Trains stop at a train station
    On my desk there's a workstation....

  76. Hide your habits *better* - use a VM 24/7 by 5of0 · · Score: 1

    No, even better - install Ubuntu (or your distro of choice) in a VM inside of the copy of XP/Vista that's being monitored. That'd leave about one extra (on top of all the crapware) program installed/running, total. At the end of three months, collect your Vista disk and do as you please with it.

    --
    You all have Oo.o and Firefox, so get World Wind.
  77. Misconception of free by Almahtar · · Score: 1

    They're giving away FREE copies It's not *entirely* free - those caveats you mention are pretty valuable. You know all those "get a FREE iPod!!!" sites that only require you sign up for 7 advertisement sites and get 10 friends to do the same? They sell that information for good money to companies that do "industry analysis".

    In this case Microsoft must be unhappy with how much their analysis is costing, so they're bypassing the middle man. You still volunteer to help their research by giving away information that is valuable to them - and that they will use for whatever they want.

    Example - if they notice too many people using Opera or FireFox (or even IE6), they're going to try to figure out how to push IE7 -- how they do that may cost you indirectly via more incompatibilities, more FUD, whatever. Sure, it may not - maybe they'll just try to make IE7 that much better, but there are no guarantees. By giving them your information you gave them the right to do whatever they want with it, and it may well cost everybody a lot.

    The cost is always passed on to the consumer.
    1. Re:Misconception of free by Asmor · · Score: 1

      The value of your opinion is definitely greater than 0, so you make a valid point. However, as far as I know, there's no easy way to monetize that value... It's kind of like having this giant diamond in your basement. Worth a lot of money, but impossible to sell because you can't get it up the stairs.

  78. FUCK IT, I DO IT! by Wolfdan72 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ha ha thats funny! Its like hey were going to let you test our shitty OS because people are going back to Xp! Fuck, I will take up their offer and put ME and 3.1 on VM and use them for the remaining three months. Also download all kinds of porn and tell them that Vista still sucks and burn the dvd and piss on the ashes and send back to them! I mean come Microsoft, just tells us your desperate and that you fuck up!

  79. There is no free lunch by fleung · · Score: 1

    "There is no free lunch" Milton Friedman said..

    So, free software means free usage information for capture.

    Also, I am not qualify, not living in US or Canada...

  80. Umm, how is that different? by cheros · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, Vista ALREADY snoops on the user, so as far as I can tell this "offer" is a bit like their mea culpa monopoly voucher, totally without value. Actually, given what's on offer they should GIVE you money to install Vista (install Vista, pleeeeeease. We desperately need the numbers).

    The longer I look at Vista, the more those Apple ads appear to have been strangely accurate, and I don't even HAVE a Mac (although I think that will change next year).

    Microsoft Vista, the best marketing campaign for 'anything but Microsoft' yet. It's a shame there isn't a Darwin award for companies :-).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  81. Re:This information includes, but is not limited t by plierhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no MS fanboy but hey, lets not get all emotional. If your company was putting out a similar offer for your own software your lawyers would be damn sure too to put "not limited to" after the list of data being collected. Its a standard legal phrase that you use unless you actually a) do have the complete, exhaustive list of what will be collected, and b) you are utterly confidnt that if someone changes what is collected that you will hear about it and get to change the terms of use.

    --

    [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

  82. how about exclude/include lists? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    What if I want to selectively say DONT cache any APPs, but DO CACHE all data in C:\work_files\ or C:\src ???

    For most things, I really dont care that it has to read it of a HD, its bloody fast enough that I dont care if it reads it in 120ms vs 800ms.
    And if future computers use faster and faster HDs, especially flash based "HDs" for their system C:\ drives, then all this prefetching is useless if the flash
    can load at 100MB/sec. Its getting now to the point that is probably worth putting windows onto a 4-8gig flash drive of some sort (CF), rather than USB.
    Maybe motherboards will come pre chipped with 8gig flash for the OS, no more HD needed, that would be bliss for silent systems, use a real HD only for media/games/big apps.

    OT - how about firefox developers build a selective cache that has options like, cache all jpegs/gifs, or exclude blah websites, or always cache gifs 32kb permanently.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  83. Non geeks just have aquariums by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna fire up a bunch of VM's...


    Someone already has got this idea :
    http://xkcd.com/350/
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  84. On my Mac Pro... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

    I'm almost tempted do go in for this, get Vista 64 Ultimate and run it on my Mac Pro... maybe twice a year, just for shits and giggles. I wonder if they'd be able to monitor me correctly?

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    1. Re:On my Mac Pro... by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      I'm almost tempted do go in for this, get Vista 64 Ultimate and run it on my Mac Pro... maybe twice a year, just for shits and giggles. I wonder if they'd be able to monitor me correctly?

      You can't run the 64 bit versions of Windows on Macs (at least not easily.)
      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
  85. i don't think they really want to know by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    I don't think they really want to know what we're doing - they just needed a reason for giving it away, because nobody wants to buy it - and they might have figured that when vista is in more houses, others might accept and buy it...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  86. Good idea by unoengborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will give Microsoft valuable information that will help them develop better software in the future. The quesiton is how many users are prepared to trust them enough to allow this. But as it is comleatly volentary I see no problem in doing so, other than that they may get some biased results as people that value privacy and security most likely will not participate. However, personally, I wourld like to be paid a little more than just with some free software to do this kind of testing for Microsoft.

    I would actually like to see open source projects such as Gnome and KDE to do a similar thing (As long as it is volentary). Knowing how the users use their is essential to create good usable systems, and very few usability tests are performed on software in the FOSS world, so something like this would probably be even more beneficial to these kind of projects. I would also think that more people would be prepared to volontear this kind information to e.g. the KDE or Gnome team than they would to big evil Microsoft. After all very few Gnome or KDE users would worry about that a big evil company might discover unlicenced software on their systems.

    --
    God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    1. Re:Good idea by webmaster404 · · Score: 1

      But, how much of that "information" will be used? They had beta testers on Vista, they all complained about the slowness of it, the new-ness of the layout and other features but MS kept them in. All this is, is just a front for *IAA monitoring, and a way to tell people that MS owns your computer because you didn't pay for your OS. As for open-source projects, However as for "uses" of GNOME/KDE systems, there isn't much data that could be collected only via GNOME or KDE because they are just small parts of a working Linux system. What would you do for usability? Send in how many times the person clicked on the KDE logo? See how many keypresses on the GNOME panel? Usability tests work a lot better in person or via a recorded desktop that would slow down the system to unusable. Now, I am not suggesting that KDE/GNOME should not try to have usability studies, but doing them the way MS is doing them just doesn't work for usability. For MS's ways it would work because you could see how obtain CTRL+ALT+DEL was pressed, how frequently applications hanged, what bugs they were getting, which applications they liked but nothing related the usability (well except for how obtain it Blue Screens because you can't do much when that happens).

      --
      There is no "disagree" moderation, and troll, flamebait and overrated are not valid substitutes
    2. Re:Good idea by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      I agree with you real usability tests are far better than this, but they are also much more resource intensive to perform. This is why they are not performed as often as one would wish in free software projects.

      Just consider a simple thing like the use of a file manager.
      For one thing, you could get information like, users in general use move file twice as often as they use copy file and 999 time more often than they make symbolik links in konqueror. This could be used in e.g. KDE filemanagers to determine the best order on the "copy here", "move here", "link here", "cancel" popup menu that appears when you drop files over a drop target. (figures just fictional). Or it may turn out that the best thing would be to remove the menu altogheter if one item turn out to be much more used than the others.

      You could get information on what directories users opens and edit files in using gui editors.

      This could result in new desktop shortcuts or, that some seldom used directories should act like hidden files in the GUI. My suspicion is that /etc/, /dev, /proc /lib /bin /sys are rarely used from the GUI, as people who know what to do with them most likely edit them from a terminal using vi or some other cli text editor.

      Having information like this may help the Gnome team to not simplify/remove things that people actually usem and the KDE team to simplify/remove things that people almost never use.

      To get the most out of this kind of data, I would try to make statistics of the most probable user action given that a certain action just have been performed. And the frequency of each action. Combine this information with the file types if any involved and user serveys and you would probably get a quite good picture on how the GUI is used.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
  87. Microsoft is no longer giving Vista away... by Swift+Kick · · Score: 3, Informative

    From an email just received (2:05AM 12/12/07):

    What happened to the free product option?

    Thank you for your interest in the feedback program. Due to overwhelming response, the supply of gifts has been exhausted so we have closed our free product offer on 12/11/2007 at 2pm Pacific Time. Thanks to everyone that participated!

    --
    "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  88. There is nothing there about free Windows... by argent · · Score: 1

    The only free software described on the site is the Windows Feedback Program software itself.

  89. Terms... by Lefty_POl · · Score: 0, Troll

    Only for folk who in live in a country called U.S. (anyone heard of it?!)

  90. Nothing new here.... by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has been doing this for years, except now they're telling you about it and when you agree with it you get a free windows (as long as you agree with spyware).

    I think this is a desperate move to thwart Linux (getting windows costs now as much money as Linux). Except that the usage conditions are a lot worse as Linux.

  91. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been in that program for a while.... this is pretty old news....

    It's really just expanded of what Windows already collects and sends anyway...

    Not only that, but my wish to help make sure Vienna/7 isn't the failure that Vista is (although I do like Vista) is stronger than any worries I may have. In addition, Its nice of them to ask to do it, instead of just doing it.

    Just my 0.002 cents

  92. Don't Give a Flyin' by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Funny

    As someone who cares not one bit about my "privacy", I'd love to see more of these types of deals. The only thing that makes me wary when dealing with "privacy" is I prefer not to be spammed for the rest of my life. I could, however, give a flyin' f*&k if anyone is monitoring what I do on my computer. If you are monitoring me, be prepared to be bored to tears.

    1. Re:Don't Give a Flyin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neowin reports the offer is now withdrawn :

    2. Re:Don't Give a Flyin' by BPPG · · Score: 1

      At least it's better than buying a copy... This way, you already know for sure that MS has a backdoor into your computer.

      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
  93. Monitor my use of the program? by justkeeper · · Score: 0

    They'll just see me pressing Ctrl+Alt+Delete over and over again.

  94. I signed up... by Darundal · · Score: 1

    ...they didn't necessarily make it "easy" either. I never got the first confirmation email they sent me(waited 15 minutes), so I tried having it sent to a non-hotmail account, which promptly received the confirmation. I bit because for me, it is essentially free, as the only thing that ever happens on my Windows install is playing games and browsing non-porn sites. Hell, I don't even have a decent audioplayer installed. So, for me, letting them observe me playing UT3 or CSS for an hour or two a day essentially constitutes free, which is incidentally enough, the only price that I could ever stomach for any version of Vista.

  95. It runs well in wine... by ninevoltz · · Score: 1

    This ought to trip somebody out when they look at my report.

    --
    Death is life's great reward. R. Hoek
  96. Even if they paid me to use it... by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    I would not take it. And I'm currently developing (Java) on Windows XP. Either tells you something about me or Microsoft products. You choose which one.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  97. The catch... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    The catch...you have to use Vista..


    And associate with microsoft.
  98. All that work for a free downgrade to Vista ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am happy with WinXp/Ubuntu dual booting.

    Who in their right mind go to all that effort for a free downgrade ?

  99. Yeah I got that email..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently you have to email 50 of your friends and Bill Gates sends you a free copy! Personally!!

  100. Free Vista? I don't see it by dougmc · · Score: 1

    What will Microsoft provide?
    We will provide to you the software and necessary licensing to accomplish the data collection. Specifically Microsoft will provide you with:
    * All software, including documentation, required to gather data regarding your home computer use.
    I guess technically, `the software and necessary licensing' could mean the OS too, but I really don't see anything that says you get Vista for free. It sounds like they will just let you download their monitoring program free -- I can't find anything that says you actually get Vista or Office or whatever. If I read this right, the benefit to you is that you get to tell them what you think about your Microsoft software and what you do with it, and well, that's it. If you get free (beyond their monitoring application) Microsoft software, I can't find where they say this.


    It also says this --

    Download and install the software on your Windows Vista or Windows XP computer if you are joining the automated feedback program.
    ... and somehow, I don't think this means `download Vista or XP' ... it means download their software to your computer that already has Vista or XP.
  101. So what is really different with this? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 0, Troll
    Microsoft is already watching what you do with Windows Vista. All this means is that you will get a free copy of Vista if you explicitly acknowledge that Microsoft collects your usage patterns to sell to advertisers.

    This will probably be the way the Windows franchise is run in the future: no charge for the OS, but Microsoft will sell your usage info to the pop-up ad crowd.

  102. Where do you get the Vista Ultimate? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I went through the survey, and I've seen nothing on the site about a free Vista...

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Where do you get the Vista Ultimate? by Khoa · · Score: 1

      The free software has been discontinued as of DEC 11.

    2. Re:Where do you get the Vista Ultimate? by tjstork · · Score: 1

      The free software has been discontinued as of DEC 11.

      Well, I guess I'll be filling out my opinions in the form of feature requests to the KDE team, as I continue with my SUSE Linux! Sorry MS, ya had yer chance and blew it!

      --
      This is my sig.
    3. Re:Where do you get the Vista Ultimate? by torkus · · Score: 1

      I noticed. I submitted my address once well before the cut-off time (didn't know it was coming) and the email never came through to activate. I tried again later and it came through exactly 3 minutes after they killed the freebies.

      GAH. I was actually going to have a legal copy of Vista (or office 2007). Oh well. MS loses out on the deal, not me. I simply won't run a *legal* copy of Vista of O2K7.

      Maybe someone at M$ realized that their software is so "popular" (read: ubiquitous) because it was so easy to pirate back in the day. 'Oh, Bill, here's the new version of windows. Install and try it out and give me back the disks tomorrow' does very well for spreading the popularity of an OS. It's a HELL of a lot better than lame commercials on TV that no one really wants to see. 'Oh, Bill, there's another version of windows that doesn't do anything too special. It's $400 for the version that anyone would actually want. Why not go buy a copy and see if it's any good.' - The difference is utterly apparant.

      Now, you'll say that M$ doesn't make money off number one. You're wrong. If the majority of people are familiar with 'operating system XYZ' a company is going to look to that first when it comes time to choose because really, it's easier to have a small department secure a crummy OS that everyone can work in than educate and train (and hire!) people on something more obscure even if it is superior.

      p.s. Intentionally avoiding discussion of 'better but more obscure'. I may or may not agree...but it's not relevant to the point. This theme doesn't have to apply only to windows. There are very few examples of sucessful software with 0% piracy rates. A very few number of games (i.e. WoW) are the only examples that come to mind...and they're 1) low up-front cost compared to windows or office and 2) pure entertainment 3) offen have free trials

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  103. So when this doesn't work... by aldousd666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We'll be able to point, laugh, and say that "Microsoft can't even GIVE Vista away." I'm not a microsoft hater either, but vista is a colossal foobar. I work in an IT shop, and I've had to have it installed because I'm required to be one version ahead of deployment whenever possible, and I've hated every bleeding minute of Vista Enterprise. I even had to change settings to get it to hit our NAS shares, which are essentially samba shares on a huge redhat fronted storage device. (Incidentally XP hadn't any issues out of the box with it.)

    --
    Speak for yourself.
  104. Have a CD smashing party! by billcopc · · Score: 1

    VMware is your friend. Go ahead and emulate that sumbitch while you do all those naughty things outside the sandbox. :)

    Honestly though, this is just another monopoly-pushing move by MS. Most Windows people get their OS when they buy a computer (thanks to the lovely OEM cartel). This is probably targeted at people who have an unlicensed copy of Windows, and by "converting" them into legit users, MS can claim a bunch of big adoption numbers when the next round of FUD comes around. They could even pull a random number out of their ass and say "this many Linux commies switched over, the rest were pirated".

    Then they can go to the supreme court and say "Your honor, we're not an illegal monopoly; People WANT to use our software, we can't help being so awesome!" or some weak paraphrasing.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  105. The BBC did this... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    ...a while ago in their Top Gear programme. They had three cars of the same model, one in red, one in blue, one in white, and had a phone in to see which was the least favourite colour. The loser would have the Hamster treatment (ie thrashed around a track until it self-destructed). That's right, folks, half a million quid's worth of car and the Ham gets to destroy it.

    The result was, the white one got the treatment, and by a wide voting margin. When said car eventually went into production six months later, you /couldn't get it in white/.

    Microsoft are doing the same thing here, by seeing who would go for the Vista freebie and who'd go for the productivity freebies. They're heading for a major change in direction and whichever way they turn depends a lot on the results of this ongoing survey.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  106. Seems like a fair deal by DirtyFly · · Score: 1

    Ok, what is the major problem here ? M$ says their terms, you either want it or not, if you agree youl get hundreds of usd in M$ products, if you dont like it just do not sign up, the public reaction say it all, a few hours after the program opened they have their list full. Its a fair deal even from m$ Jorge

  107. Uhm... by di0s · · Score: 1

    "The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program."
    Don't they do that already (WGA, Activation, et. al)?
  108. Why? by mrjb · · Score: 1

    Are they trying to impress shareholders later on with an astronomic number of legally installed copies?

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  109. What Free Software? by thedarkstorm · · Score: 1

    I don't see anywhere on the site where they promise anything, or did I miss it?

    --
    ... hey ... I had a .sig, bu then MicroSo$$ embraced it...
  110. just for fun by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    Install it, put in on the internet
    write a program that does nothing put FTP files to itself for say 90 days straight
    then remove it from the internet, when they ask, say I dont use it for the internet
    I use it for a door stop...

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  111. Does this include monitoring audio, too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They might hear some interesting comments!

  112. The real catch is it's Vista by Thaelon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The real catch is it's Vista.

    *ducks*

    --

    Question everything

  113. I wonder what by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
    They'd think when they monitor you format your harddrive in a couple weeks, lol.

    Seriously though, your voice might get heard more if they see the problems you have with the product. Installing a VM system and spending all day using the distro of your choice probably would send a strong message.

  114. Missed opportunity by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Microsoft want to convert Linux users over to Windows? Sure, this would need a different kind of program. But still, monitoring what you do in Linux could give them some insight into what what Linux users do and maybe they can make their next products something people would want to stay with Windows for.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  115. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  116. *sees kids, addresses them* by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or cocaine!

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  117. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  118. No giveway was offered to me. by wildcatherder · · Score: 1

    I went through the registration and questionnaire process. At no time was I offered any kind of giveaway. I got as far as being told to download the monitoring program and stopped. I do not intend to install "spyware" without some kind of payoff. Possibly the free software is offered later, seems unlikely. From what I saw, I simply agree voluntarily to have everything on my computer monitored by Microsoft. Look this gift horse in the mouth carefully.

  119. Expired by mprindle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Microsoft is no longer giving away any free stuff. Here's the email from Microsoft:

    "What happened to the free product option?

    Thank you for your interest in the feedback program. Due to overwhelming response, the supply of gifts has been exhausted so we have closed our free product offer on 12/11/2007 at 2pm Pacific Time. Thanks to everyone that participated!"

    Source: Spoofee.com

    1. Re:Expired by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

      You have an actual link to the article that you can post?

      --
      Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
    2. Re:Expired by atopian · · Score: 1

      Well thats a shame on their part. Would be the only way Vista would ever get near a computer in my house. Oh well I've begun forcibly moving the roomates off of XP and onto Ubuntu anyways.

      --
      Hrm loving these .sigs :P
  120. You get it Free as in Beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with NSA on tap!

  121. Crashing the survey... by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 1

    HEY! I just crasked the initial survey after telling them how to start the Windows Registry (it's one of the questions...). I think they didn't like some characters (I typed "Start > Run > Regedit").

    The Windows Vista Ultimate experience seems REALLY promising!!!

  122. Cal Worthington does software by wardk · · Score: 1

    I can't eat all these Vistas!

  123. Bzzt!! Wrong! by norminator · · Score: 0

    Actually, it's not an option of one or the other... you have to do both the online survey and the spyware to get any "free" software.

  124. Terms of Use and Notices ("Agreement") by soybean · · Score: 1

    Terms of Use and Notices ("Agreement")
    AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES

    DESCRIPTION OF WINDOWS FEEDBACK PROGRAM.
    The Windows Feedback Program ("WFP") is a voluntary participant-based project which will gather information about computer use in the home. The information collected is intended to allow Microsoft to identify how its future products may better serve you, our customer. You can find out more about what information will be collected and why, by going to the Windows Feedback Program website (WFP Program Site).

    The WFP is comprised of various Web sites, servers, applications, and other services operated by Microsoft or its affiliates (collectively, the "Program Services").

    ACCEPTING THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
    This Agreement constitutes a legal agreement between you ("Program Participant") and Microsoft. The Program Services are offered to you conditioned on your acceptance without modification of this Agreement. Your use of the Program Services constitutes your agreement to all such terms, conditions, and notices.

    Portions of the Program Services may be governed by guidelines, rules, notices and other terms and conditions ("Additional Terms") posted at the WFP Program Site. All such Additional Terms are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the Additional Terms and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. However, the Windows Feedback Program Privacy Statement, discussed in the Privacy and Personal Information section below supersedes any conflicting language in this Agreement and in the Additional Terms published on the WFP Program Site. The Program Services are offered to you conditioned on your acceptance without modification of the Additional Terms contained herein and as posted at the WFP Program Site. Your use of the Program Services constitutes your agreement to the Additional Terms.

    MODIFICATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
    Microsoft may wish to update or change the terms, conditions and notices for the Program Services from time-to-time, to reflect changes in the Program Services, changes in the law affecting the Program Services or for other good reasons. You understand and agree that Microsoft reserves the right to make these changes. Microsoft will post minor changes to the WFP Program Site. In the event of a material change to this agreement, we will notify you by email about the change. Once notified, you have the option of discontinuing the program. You agree that your continuation of the program after notification of a material change demonstrates acceptance by you of the new terms.

    PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.
    Unless otherwise specified, the Program Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. Except to download/print for your personal use, you may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services that are a part of and provided under the Program Services except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

    PRIVACY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION.
    Microsoft agrees that it will only collect and use your personal information in accordance with the terms of the Windows Feedback Program Privacy Statement.

    SOFTWARE AND CONTENT AVAILABLE THROUGH PROGRAM SERVICES AND THE WFP PROGRAM SITE.
    All content and software that is made available to view and/or download from the WFP Program Site that is part of the Program Services ("Software") is owned by and is the copyrighted work of Microsoft and/or its suppliers. Your use of the Software is governed by the terms of the license agreement, if any, that accompanies or is included with the Software ("License Agreement"). You may not install or use any Software that is accompanied by or includes a License Agreement unless you first agree to the License Agreement terms.

    For any Software not accompanied by a License Agreement, Microsoft hereby grants to yo

  125. Source? by SEMW · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, Vista ALREADY snoops on the user What specifically are you referring to here?

    The only things I can think of that you could be thinking of are WGA (which is a hardware hash, not usage patterns) and error reports (for which it is easy enough to click 'don't send' instead of 'send').
    --
    What's purple and commutes? An Abelian grape.
    1. Re:Source? by cheros · · Score: 1
      It's not really a secret that there's altogether too much chatting between a Vista system and Redmond (use Google, the stories aren't *that* old). Sure, WGA is a problem too because of it's ability to maliciously reduce functionality and, en passant, accuse perfectly innocent people and corporations of being software thieves, but that's only a small part of the problem. It's all the other stuff that seems to be shipped to Redmond without an attempt to seek permission, and wholly documented.


      In addition, I suggest you have a good read of the Vista EULA, and also ask yourself how an update system that is set to NON-automatic still somehow manages to update. The OS is *made* for spyware.


      I can accept activation traffic. Once. After that there is no reason why a system has to chat with anyone on the planet except form when *I* ask it. None whatsoever. Thankfully it's no longer my problem :-).

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  126. Discounts for college students by Khoa · · Score: 1

    At my university, students can get the latest Vista and Office for $15 ea. XP and the old Office cost $5. Not bad considering they retail for $300.

  127. don't need to be monitored by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm the only one that went to the website but monitoring is not mandatory. You can choose to only answer email surveys and not be monitored at all. So in that case not a bad deal if you wanted one of the offered products. MS sent me .net 2005 for free through another program by watching a couple classes on it and answering a surveys without any hassle.

  128. Free... by SniperClops · · Score: 1

    I still don't want it

  129. Best use for Vista by russotto · · Score: 1

    I currently have a motherboard, CPU (Athlon 64 3200+ socket 939), and memory left over from various projects. This would be the perfect adjunct to it. No need to get a case, power supply, or hard drive, just throw the CD on top of the rest of the parts; it's not like I'm going to use it.

  130. microsoft lacks vista users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So few developers on the Redmond campus use Vista any more (it's all Ubuntu and OSX these days) that the only contact they're willing to endure with Vista is watching other suckers use it.

  131. MS Vista Ultimate is "allowed" to run in a VM by Locutus · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good way to get Vista in a VM for free and torture it in any way shape and form you like. Honeypot anyone?

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  132. uh nothing to see here... by steveaustin1971 · · Score: 0

    Its just a survey and some software to install that monitors PC use, no freebies to be found...

  133. sounds ok to me... by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    .. but can they monitor it, if I stuff it in a drawer and never install it? ROTFLOL!

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  134. wow, what a big fraud by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    There's no free software. Just surveys and spyware.

    nice headline asses!

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  135. yawn. . . by oliphaunt · · Score: 1

    yeah, wake me up again when they're giving away the hardware to run it on too.

    --




    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  136. The question is... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    Will they provide me with a powerful enough computer to run Vista Ultimate?

    ~GO

  137. Yahoo = wait for reply, mac.com immediate reply by DynamoJoe · · Score: 1

    I have enough machines lying around that I'd like a free copy of Vista. I signed up using my yahoo email account and the reply from Microsoft didn't show up in an hour, so I signed up using my .Mac account. The reply was immediate. The confirmation showed up on my yahoo bulk folder 22 hours later. Either this is yahoo's spam filter causing the delay, or Mac users are being given preference.

    --
    bah.
  138. Would you take anything from this man? by jellydonot · · Score: 1

    Would you take any freebies from this man?

  139. The EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terms of Use and Notices ("Agreement")
    AGREEMENT BETWEEN YOU AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION OR ONE OF ITS AFFILIATES

    DESCRIPTION OF WINDOWS FEEDBACK PROGRAM.
    The Windows Feedback Program ("WFP") is a voluntary participant-based project which will gather information about computer use in the home. The information collected is intended to allow Microsoft to identify how its future products may better serve you, our customer. You can find out more about what information will be collected and why, by going to the Windows Feedback Program website (WFP Program Site).

    The WFP is comprised of various Web sites, servers, applications, and other services operated by Microsoft or its affiliates (collectively, the "Program Services").

    ACCEPTING THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT.
    This Agreement constitutes a legal agreement between you ("Program Participant") and Microsoft. The Program Services are offered to you conditioned on your acceptance without modification of this Agreement. Your use of the Program Services constitutes your agreement to all such terms, conditions, and notices.

    Portions of the Program Services may be governed by guidelines, rules, notices and other terms and conditions ("Additional Terms") posted at the WFP Program Site. All such Additional Terms are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between the Additional Terms and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. However, the Windows Feedback Program Privacy Statement, discussed in the Privacy and Personal Information section below supersedes any conflicting language in this Agreement and in the Additional Terms published on the WFP Program Site. The Program Services are offered to you conditioned on your acceptance without modification of the Additional Terms contained herein and as posted at the WFP Program Site. Your use of the Program Services constitutes your agreement to the Additional Terms.

    MODIFICATION OF THIS AGREEMENT.
    Microsoft may wish to update or change the terms, conditions and notices for the Program Services from time-to-time, to reflect changes in the Program Services, changes in the law affecting the Program Services or for other good reasons. You understand and agree that Microsoft reserves the right to make these changes. Microsoft will post minor changes to the WFP Program Site. In the event of a material change to this agreement, we will notify you by email about the change. Once notified, you have the option of discontinuing the program. You agree that your continuation of the program after notification of a material change demonstrates acceptance by you of the new terms.

    PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.
    Unless otherwise specified, the Program Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. Except to download/print for your personal use, you may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services that are a part of and provided under the Program Services except as expressly provided in this Agreement.

    PRIVACY AND PERSONAL INFORMATION.
    Microsoft agrees that it will only collect and use your personal information in accordance with the terms of the Windows Feedback Program Privacy Statement.

    SOFTWARE AND CONTENT AVAILABLE THROUGH PROGRAM SERVICES AND THE WFP PROGRAM SITE.
    All content and software that is made available to view and/or download from the WFP Program Site that is part of the Program Services ("Software") is owned by and is the copyrighted work of Microsoft and/or its suppliers. Your use of the Software is governed by the terms of the license agreement, if any, that accompanies or is included with the Software ("License Agreement"). You may not insta

  140. I would like to see their 'download' stats by kitgerrits · · Score: 1


    If people are given a choice between 'Free' Vista and 'Free' XP:
    - Will they use it to try out an upgrade for free?
    - Or will they simply use it to get a 'Free' license for Windows XP?

    I think they already already got their answer,
        and they're not very happy about it.

    --
    "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
  141. Re:Bzzt!! Wrong! by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, when I click Get Started, I'm given two check boxes. If you can provide a link that says you only get free software (I actually don't see that anywhere from the link submitted) if you do the automated survey, I'd be happy to check it out.

  142. This is not a big deal nor is it new by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to be complaining about "spyware". Two comments:

    1) How else can Microsoft address usability except by collecting data about which functions are used and when and in what order. I doubt they care about your document they just ned to know things like which of four methods you use to (say) make a word bold face. They are offing to pay you for this data and you get to decide if you want ot accept.

    2) Other organizations have done the exact same thing. Do you really thing Microsoft invents new ideas? This has been done on open source projects

    3) Software that runs on a web browser always does this. Your actions get written to a server log file. I wonder what slashdot.org serve logs look like. They likely contain a list of what each of is are reading and when we read it.

  143. Funny. I send Ubuntu usage and crash data ... by quixote9 · · Score: 1

    without a second thought. On a Borg product, you'd have to turn me into one of the Collective first ... and even then you might have to kill me before you could get my finger to push the send button. It's called trust. It's free too. Free as in priceless.

  144. I could do this! With a VM running ubuntu... by pyrr · · Score: 1

    While Vista might be a crappy host OS, they could at least see that Linux makes the Windows Vista Experience (tm) better. But only so long as you only have to have that experience when you're booting or the host OS crashes.

  145. I'll put my 2 cents in.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is a good idea for MS. I will fill out the surveys hoping that their next OS will be better built around what customers want. Look at the change from ME -> XP that occured...I'm hoping that they'll listen and make a better product.

  146. Been there, done that . . . by hawk · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find my Penn State XP install disk at one point, and had to be issued another.

    Turned out that my wife *had* been using it as a coaster, following earlier instructions on AOL CD's . . . :)

    hawk

  147. I prefer to call it by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    "the Bonzi Buddy license"

    I think MS is brilliant for doing this. They've embraced, extended and tried to extinguish third party browsers and firewall software, might as well do the same with spyware.

    It's like buying laxatives and tossing them straight into the loo...eliminates the middleman and probably more efficient.

  148. I'm in! by zoikes · · Score: 1

    I think I'll get a copy of Vista and NOT use it ...they need those datapoints, too.

  149. The Caveat by brentonboy · · Score: 1

    The caveat is that you have to let them monitor your use of the program. This is misleading. The real caveat is you have to let them monitor your *current* OS for 3 months. *Then* you get the free software.
  150. Only for video games by schmichael · · Score: 1

    This is great! The only thing I need Windows for is playing games that don't work on Linux.

    billg can sit back and watch me pwn some n00bs

  151. Smaple size is everything. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Sorry but your sample is really too small. I can find four of five people that thought that ME was great.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  152. I'd go for this by krunk7 · · Score: 1
    Why? Usage would translate into:
    *uptime => approx. 4-6 hours per week
    *usaage => playing video game X entire time

    The rest of the time I'd be on different boot partition with a different OS.

  153. Re:Bzzt!! Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because they don't give you free software anymore, it was apparently a limited time offer. You used to be able to get a free copy of Vista only if you agreed to both the survey and the monitoring software. Now they just let you sign up for the survey or monitoring software, but aren't going to give you anything for doing it.

  154. Don't they do this anyway? by chainLynx · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure Microsoft monitors your use of software one way or the other... http://badvista.fsf.org/what-s-wrong-with-microsoft-windows-vista

  155. Sure... by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    Let 'em track all the pr0n I download.

    I wonder if their "free" offer includes a jar of Vaseline to ease the pain?

  156. Free to US residents only, whats new by Bull_UK · · Score: 1

    It seems that nearly every 'free' deal these days is only for US residents, maybe I should move, then again I'm sure it wont be long before the UK becomes US state anyway.

  157. Not the first time - used to make Office 2007 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft used similar opt-in monitoring in Office 2003 to help make Office 2007. There's a decent blog post on the most used commands in Office which explains the influence on the design of Office 2007. The Office UI team were interested in things like whether toolbar buttons were used or keyboard shortcuts and frequency of use of individual items.

    The monitoring is not too different from packages installed being monitored by the optin 'popularity-contest' in Debian/Ubuntu which help somewhat to get the most used packages in earlier disks.

  158. It's shareholder perception that counts by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    the dog just gets skates! It still annoys you etc, just faster.

    From MS financial perspective it is that bad. Real money counts for little. It is shareholder perception that counts. For the first time in MS history, Joe Shareholder will likely have the opinion that MS screwed up. The shareholders will be saying: "We paid $5bn and we got this suckware! Give us new management!"

    Remember too that this comes in the same set as some other rogue waves: Zune, Xbox360 with no really good news in sight. All setting up for a perfect storm.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  159. Re:Bzzt!! Wrong! by Kalriath · · Score: 1
    http://wfp.microsoft.com/FAQ.aspx:

    What will Microsoft provide?
    We will provide to you the software and necessary licensing to accomplish the data collection. Specifically Microsoft will provide you with:

            * All software, including documentation, required to gather data regarding your home computer use.
            * In consideration of your participation, a license covering the software provided, under the terms and conditions that accompany that software. Please note, except as expressly licensed to you in those Licenses, Microsoft retains all right, title, and interest in and to the Microsoft software provided under the Windows Feedback Program.

    But that's ONLY for the Automated Feedback Program option.

    Note that opting out is still an option. That page also expressly says what they collect too - nothing too spectacular.
    --
    For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  160. Free MS Win & Word by JustPutt2 · · Score: 1

    The Lizard is giving you the sleeves of his vest again,,,,,,,,,,,, NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  161. A rose by any other name? by evilremoh · · Score: 1

    Is it telling that Microsoft Office Ultimate 2007 ($679.95 suggested retail) and Vista Ultimate ($399 suggested retail) are seemingly valued the same in this offer as Microsoft Streets and Trips 2008 ($39.99 suggested retail)?

  162. well ... by garphik · · Score: 1

    Google has got some competition now.

  163. Worthless to me... by dpastern · · Score: 1

    This is worthless to me - the offer is ONLY valid for US residents. Talk about discrimination! Why does the American government and corporations treat the rest of the world with such disdain, as if we don't exist?

    COULD YOU PLEASE AMEND THE DAMN WELL STORY TO SAY THAT IT'S ONLY FOR US RESIDENTS.

    Dave

    --
    Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. --Martin Luther King Jr.
  164. I tried to sign up by suman28 · · Score: 1

    When I gave them my email, I started getting emails about
    Hallie Berry drunk and exposed"
    "Asain bagned by a bigidck" and "Free Windows" in my Junk Mail folder. That just is now funny. Where can I opt-out now?