Indeed. They could probably take the hit themselves and get the replacement themselves for *one* disc from the fees they collect from the user alone, but when they 3 more than that suddenly they have $200+ of scratched product that will take a long long time to collect from that single user in fees...
I can't wait till some "poor" looking person gets beat with nightsticks in the Apple store after a new employee fails to find the ID number in the computer and the salesperson who did the sale is on break:) The resulting lawsuit would be classic.
These things are for hauling stuff around. They aren't intended for combat.
Re:Legalize or illegalize illegalization?
on
Free P2P In France?
·
· Score: 1
SCOTUS could decide that a previously legal activity is covered by an existing law setting precedent that the activity is now illegal (since they can be prosecuted under an existing law).
They probably should've went with SQL Server Standard instead of Express too.... They probably just went with Express so they could say they tested 2 free and 2 non-free and dismiss SQL Express outright...
The United States via the treaties it has with the EU. And don't think the EU can ignore that without sending everyone into a depression after the backlash.
The Supreme Court appointed noone. They just told Florida they couldn't waste any more time on recounting since their needed to be an answer immediately (which was perfectly fine). Since Bush was ahead at the time, he was certified as the winner of Florida and thus won the election as a whole.
Please keep in mind the Supreme Court is ulimately the governing body on what is and is not Constitutional so they had every right to decide on the dispute over the recount.
Hint: It's in the Bill of Rights. The problem is that often the government will block anyone from taking it to court if they haven't actually been affected. The people who are affected probably don't know it or if they do, are in prison without access to the courts.
You're lucky you didn't have any "threatening" looking animals. They have a tendency to start shooting the place up when they see dogs during a search.
And then they use whatever other evidence they had against you, charge you with destruction of evidence (whether something was there or not) and then take you to court for the original charge anyway and use the evidence destruction against you. That's if you don't get shot by an officer that comes in while you're holding the hammer...
That doesn't mean 30 hours of total work. That's 30 "credit hours" which means 30 hours of lectures/whatnot PER week over the course of a semester. Ofc, that 30 hours is probabably going to be split over multiple semesters in order to be managable since the "30 hours" doesn't include the massive workload that professors expect to be done or studying or anything. In short "30 hours" in this context probably doesn't mean what you think it does.
That's nice. What if you do everything humanly possible to protect your personal information and someone gets it through negligent corporation? We're not even talking about credit cards here. We're talking about identity theft. If they manage to steal your identity, they won't need your credit card.
They are still bound by the laws of the United States and the local government. People are not allowed undue control over another person. If a judge feels that the school is over-controlling and their contract is too broad, he can smack them down for it. I can't imagine a judge would allow the school to control every aspect of a student's life and their ability to communicate with others. That would smack of imprisonment or even slavery!
Re:How did they fix it w/out updating Google Deskt
on
Google Fixes IE Bug
·
· Score: 0, Redundant
The fact that a change to Google's site closes a security risk for their offline software tells me Google's product design must suck donkey nuts.
Slashdot Mirror
Is that in terms of units sold or how much was spent on them? Notebooks tend to be pricier than dekstops.
Indeed. They could probably take the hit themselves and get the replacement themselves for *one* disc from the fees they collect from the user alone, but when they 3 more than that suddenly they have $200+ of scratched product that will take a long long time to collect from that single user in fees...
For the most part the AV software will block the exploit if it's carrying a known viral or trojan payload.
just because Apple is selling their stuff at inflated prices, it doesn't mean that they're passing it on to IBM...
You only have to get a bit more specific and then it will be patentable.
I can't wait till some "poor" looking person gets beat with nightsticks in the Apple store after a new employee fails to find the ID number in the computer and the salesperson who did the sale is on break :) The resulting lawsuit would be classic.
These things are for hauling stuff around. They aren't intended for combat.
SCOTUS could decide that a previously legal activity is covered by an existing law setting precedent that the activity is now illegal (since they can be prosecuted under an existing law).
"less than 200" and most employees would probably be min wage and no benefits whatsoever.
They probably should've went with SQL Server Standard instead of Express too.... They probably just went with Express so they could say they tested 2 free and 2 non-free and dismiss SQL Express outright...
The United States via the treaties it has with the EU. And don't think the EU can ignore that without sending everyone into a depression after the backlash.
The owners of the particular artwork apparently gave their blessing to MS.
The Supreme Court appointed noone. They just told Florida they couldn't waste any more time on recounting since their needed to be an answer immediately (which was perfectly fine). Since Bush was ahead at the time, he was certified as the winner of Florida and thus won the election as a whole.
s /stories/main.html
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/florida.ballot
Please keep in mind the Supreme Court is ulimately the governing body on what is and is not Constitutional so they had every right to decide on the dispute over the recount.
Thank god for the filibuster or the tyranny of the majority would've steamrolled all of us by now.
Hint: It's in the Bill of Rights. The problem is that often the government will block anyone from taking it to court if they haven't actually been affected. The people who are affected probably don't know it or if they do, are in prison without access to the courts.
How the hell does appending extra stuff fix the drive letters?
You're lucky you didn't have any "threatening" looking animals. They have a tendency to start shooting the place up when they see dogs during a search.
And then they use whatever other evidence they had against you, charge you with destruction of evidence (whether something was there or not) and then take you to court for the original charge anyway and use the evidence destruction against you. That's if you don't get shot by an officer that comes in while you're holding the hammer...
Because last time I checked Paramount doesn't have a private police force that can seize stuff under court order...
I've never heard of this trojan. Which one is it?
That doesn't mean 30 hours of total work. That's 30 "credit hours" which means 30 hours of lectures/whatnot PER week over the course of a semester. Ofc, that 30 hours is probabably going to be split over multiple semesters in order to be managable since the "30 hours" doesn't include the massive workload that professors expect to be done or studying or anything. In short "30 hours" in this context probably doesn't mean what you think it does.
You mean laid off when the product goes into maintenance mode in India?
That's nice. What if you do everything humanly possible to protect your personal information and someone gets it through negligent corporation? We're not even talking about credit cards here. We're talking about identity theft. If they manage to steal your identity, they won't need your credit card.
They are still bound by the laws of the United States and the local government. People are not allowed undue control over another person. If a judge feels that the school is over-controlling and their contract is too broad, he can smack them down for it. I can't imagine a judge would allow the school to control every aspect of a student's life and their ability to communicate with others. That would smack of imprisonment or even slavery!
The fact that a change to Google's site closes a security risk for their offline software tells me Google's product design must suck donkey nuts.