Slashdot Mirror


Tulane University to Reduce Engineering School

baldbobbo writes "According to University President Scott Cowen of Tulane University, the School of Engineering will be greatly reduced. I have to wonder, as a student who can graduate in May 2007 (the deadline for those students to still receive a degree in any of the cut majors) with a Computer Science degree, but wants to stay an extra year, should I transfer to another university, graduate on time, or switch majors?"

291 comments

  1. huh? by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would you want to stay an extra year without a degree? If you want to take non-required classes, just take them after you get the degree.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:huh? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I know someone who stayed for an extra year and an arts degree doing languages... Just because he's a comp sci student doesn't mean that he can't get another degree.

    2. Re:huh? by Seumas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That wouldn't have much to do with the article's submission then, though. After all, if he wants to get a degree in liberal arts or something after he gets his CS degree - and they're still going to teach liberal arts stuff - then what question is there to ask us in the first place?

      I think there's something missing in the overall statement. It's kind of like "My boss is kind of goofy and likes to eat meatball sandwhiches every day - should I drive my car to 3,000 miles before I tune it up or run it a little over?"

    3. Re:huh? by aprilsound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Financial Aid tends to dry up when you already have a degree (and aren't pursing a new one.) 46% of all college students receive federal aid, not to mention private scholarships, state equalization grants, and so on. Probably not affordable.

      As for the poster, you still have 2 years and you want to take your time?
      Abandon the sinking ship that is your school; unless you like the idea of having a degree from an institution that no longer has a CS program. In the new tech world, your reputation can make or break your career. In a school without a CS program, the best you can hope for is that no one has ever heard of your school, because finding out that you were the last one shoveled out the door is not going to inspire confidence.

    4. Re:huh? by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, every you should get your boss a new bottle of ketchup every 2500 miles just to be on the safe side.

      --
      Sig
    5. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tulane also has/had a five-year Masters program for the Engineering School, which might be what he meant.

    6. Re:huh? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      He really should have said so in the submission if so.

      He could at least reply to my question in-thread, otherwise this whole discussion is kinda silly.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:huh? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

      A degree alone won't neccessarily get you a good job. Most employers like to look for real world experience in internships and co-ops. I wouldn't recommend rushing through college to get your degree in time if it means sacrifcing experiences like those. Either switch to a new major that will encapsulate the old program (should one exist) or transfer to a new university (I'm sure you won't be the only one doing so).

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    8. Re:huh? by recharged95 · · Score: 1
      Why? Plenty of reasons, for instance, I graduated in 3 years and in hindsight, staying the extra year:
      • I could have finished my double minor in Math & Pre-Med (really Genetics)
      • Took it easy with a 3 class load vs. 5.
      • Enjoyed my PT job (at the hospital)
      • And in the second half of the year (2nd semester) I could have experienced the life of a typical college student and...

        PARTIED...

      Lastly, staying the extra year is only worth it if you take advantage of it. Basically have a good reason for staying (partying not really included!). You'll never reget that decision in the future.

      IMO, graduate immediately, I mean with the costs of education and degrading quality of the sciences, you'd be better off getting a job to pay of those extra classes.

  2. How about . . . by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You talk to your student advisors? That's what you pay your tuition for. How the hell would a bunch of random people on Slashdot know what you should do in some strange particular circumstances that we couldn't possibly know the details of since we aren't on the staff for your school?

    1. Re:How about . . . by tjr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly. Random people on Slashdot know everything.

    2. Re:How about . . . by twollamalove · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When's the last time you talked to a student advisor? I just graduated, and the advisors were my worst source of advice.

    3. Re:How about . . . by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, they're at his school and they're going to have a much better clue about what the school is offering and how he can use those services than a bunch of random slashdotters who don't know a thing about his school (and many who have either never been or haven't been to college in eons).

      If this was a more general question that didn't hinge on cuts at his school, that'd be different.

    4. Re:How about . . . by timeOday · · Score: 1
      OTOH, the advisors are not going to be impartial, are they? They work for the school.

      I would look at switching. If the *earliest* he could graduate is the very *last* semester they'll offer the degree, that sounds very risky. Many people don't end up graduating as soon as they thought they would.

    5. Re:How about . . . by NOLAChief · · Score: 4, Insightful
      because some of us who post to slashdot actually are alumni. And because it should be news for nerds when some of their fellow nerds are getting screwed. I graduated from Tulane in 2004 with a degree in mechanical engineering, one of the programs that is due to be cut.

      If you haven't figured it out yet, I heard about this today and I am furious. How does eliminating a quality engineering school strengthen the university? How does it strengthen the community? New Orleans is trying to rebuild. I know, my house in Metairie (jefferson parish, next door) got flooded. Life sucks, but ultimately we will rebuild. And guess what? engineers will be needed to rebuild the city and make it a better place in the long term. who better than engineers with a personal investment in the area? seriously, i have to wonder, with cowen making foolhardy decisions like this for the university he's paid to run, what business does he have running the mayor's rebuilding commission?

      Switching gears, as an alumnus, what does this say about my degree? does this mean it's worthless? if so, i want a refund, mr. cowen. every single penny i've given to the university. every single bit of blood, sweat, and tears i gave to earn my degree and try to make the university and the community a better place for it. every year you complain that alumni donation rates are down. it adversely affects your precious us news and world report rankings. want to know why we alumni aren't giving the university a dime? because of shit like this. i'm tired of being alienated at every turn.

      As for the submitter, being eligible to graduate in 2007 makes you, what? A sophomore? You still have time. Run. the good faculty will be jumping ship and if you think the tightwad financial twits will give any money for design projects to a doomed program, think again. Half the time it was like pulling teeth even before the storm. and do what I'm going to do. tell everyone you know thinking about attending tulane not to bother, regardless of major. You can't be world class without students, and you can't be world class without the support of the alumni.

      sorry about the rant. had to vent

    6. Re:How about . . . by zapster · · Score: 1

      I would think about the faculty point of view as well. I would think that most of the engineering staff are going to have their resume out very shortly, that might mean the last few semesters are very understaffed or the courses may be canceled due to a lack of teachers. Transfer now.

    7. Re:How about . . . by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Real CS nerds would solve their problems with statistical analysis

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:How about . . . by twollamalove · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that your criteria for thinking that Slashdot is a bad place for advice is being out of school for a long time or haveing little knowledge of academia. I am fall in a group completely opposite from those attributes, and my reasonable advice gets labeled trolling. You're welcome to see an advisor, but I wouldn't recommend my friends or family do so.

    9. Re:How about . . . by Fausthero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I totally agree with Chief here. The New Orleans community will be needing all the help they can get when it comes to tackling the great engineering problem that is New Orleans. It makes no sense that they should cut the engineering department when a majority of the other departments, lets say the French, or mythology department doesnt get cut. This is bullshit. So of course Tulane takes the easy way out and axes the program while emphasizing its liberal arts (read drop out alcoholics here) program. And in classic new orleans fashion, Tulane is rebuilding itself not as a new bastion of intellectual research but as the party school it has been trying to shake image of for 15 years... I will be returning to Tulane to get my Biomedical eng. bachelors and masters degree , hopefully by next december. However, I just heard word, that Tulane is laying off 250 faculty members to deal with their project $200 million dollar recovery expenses. That must be why I haven't seen spring course offerings from some of my known professors. I also wonder, how they can get rid of engineering, especially because we bring in a lot of research and get funded through other means such as the NIH, etc. So frustrated

    10. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! The advisor is the one that knows it is best for the University for him to stay in engineering knowing he can't finish on time and then he'll need to do two more years to complete a major in something else. PROFIT!

    11. Re:How about . . . by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      Well, you obviously knew enough to tell him you knew nothing, so that's gotta be worth something. Yay /.!

    12. Re:How about . . . by drgonzo59 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Real CS nerds would come up with an O(nlogn) algorithm to decide what to do given all the circumstances (input - n, is the number of circumstances, output is 1 or 0 - to change major or not to change major).

    13. Re:How about . . . by roacca · · Score: 1

      I for one, went through a similar experience. I was taking a program at a university in montreal, and was being forced to take the actual classes at a different school entirely. I was faced with getting a degree from one school, but doing the courses at another, or just leaving. After I met with advisors and recruiters from different schools, I ended up deciding to leave. That was a mistake. Because I was from a different part of the country, some of my courses were not recognized, and I was told I had to redo the '101' type science courses. However, since I was forced to do this, only upon completion would I be given admittance to the program of my choice. Needless to say, despite the marks I had, I was not admitted into the faculty as I had been promised by several recuiters and ended up changing programs entirely. Long story short, stay where you are, finish as soon as possible, and get the parchement before you get the hell out.

    14. Re:How about . . . by Seumas · · Score: 1

      What do you mean he's "getting screwed"? As he said, the program will close just AFTER he gets his degree. Sounds reasonable to me. And how would it make your existing degree worthless?

      Anyway, it's a completely reasonable move by the school. As they said in their press release, they're doing this because cuts are necessary for financial reasons due to the recovery process. They have to cut somewhere and considering the state of the industry (especially globally) - why not CS?

      Sure, we'd all like to see sports completely cut before they even touch the educational things, but that's insane. People who overturn cars and set trash cans on fire and smash windows when their team wins probably won't be too kind when the team is gone entirely. Plus, sports is what draws people to college. You know who college football teams and players and coaches are. Who the fuck knows anything about some random genius in a school? It'd be like shooting themselves in the foot.

    15. Re:How about . . . by NOLAChief · · Score: 1
      I was speaking of getting screwed in terms of the school of engineering in general, not just the submitter in particular. for students younger than he, having to transfer means an unnecessary disruption in their academic careers as they switch majors/schools. Reasons why I try to never post to slashdot under emotional duress. i tend to be unclear....

      It's not just CS that they're cutting either. Mechanical, civil and most every other discipline of engineering that tulane offers is disappearing (not to mention the 180 MD's from their teaching hospital downtown), so let's not extrapolate the state of the IT industry to unrelated careers.

      I understand that Tulane is $200 million in the hole right now. They did take a lot of damage. I've seen the pictures; driven through it. Moderate cuts to every program, so that everyone has to carry some of the load (including, oh, I donno, some of cowen's overblown salary...) would seem to be more reasonable than telling an entire school to ship out. Heck, I might've been talked into giving some money (granted I don't have much; I lost a lot in the storm too... thank $deity for good insurance). not anymore.

      sure sports draw people to a college, but if the college doesn't have any academic substance, what's the point? Besides, we don't have fans that riot when we win a championship anyway...our teams aren't that good.

    16. Re:How about . . . by hzs202 · · Score: 1

      Well, they're at his school and they're going to have a much better clue about what the school is offering and how he can use those services than a bunch of random slashdotters who don't know a thing about his school (and many who have either never been or haven't been to college in eons).

      There are however those of us that are currently in college and find feedback from Slashdot and other web related discussions quite resourceful. It's great: you post a question that you are stuck on and you get a cornucopia of answers neatly assembled in a categorized thread of wisdom (and quite a bit of foolishness but thats what the mods are for, right!).

      Then you take those wisdoms and highlight what is useful (either in memory or written down) and sit with your advisor. If he or she doesn't know what the hell they are talking about you can reference the wisdom received from Slashdot and control your own destiny. Instead of relying on Fred the dead-beat-Dad and part-time university advisor.

      However, if the advisor does know something you can still use the Slashdot-wisdom to pose possible senarios to the advisor and see the limitations of each. And they will have to sit there and listen to you because as someone wrote on an earlier post... that is what you are paying them for.

    17. Re:How about . . . by adrianmonk · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You talk to your student advisors? That's what you pay your tuition for.

      That doesn't mean they're anything other than completely worthless.

      I went to school at the University of Texas, and I dropped out and then came back 7 years later after working in the computer industry for the whole time. During the intervening time, they had changed the number of the intro computer science class (CS was my major) from CS304P to CS307, and they changed the language from Pascal to Scheme or Haskell (depending on the section). Even though I had originally tested out of the original intro class and the class after that and had gone on to take several other CS classes and do well in them before dropping out, the advisor that I talked to in the CS department still insisted that I needed to take the new intro class.

      I explained that I was quite confident I could handle picking up where I left off in the program instead of starting at the beginning. She countered that if I didn't take the intro class, I would "miss out on important concepts like recursion". I assured her that I was well-acquainted with recursion already, etc., etc., but she wouldn't budge.

      Luckily, rather than giving in to the urge to set her straight using a very loud and unfriendly tone of voice, I retained my composure, and we worked out a plan where I would register for the intro class, then on the first day consult the professor and let him make a determination whether the class was necessary for me or not. If the professor decided I didn't need the intro class, then I would take an additional upper-division CS elective as a substitute. (And, this isn't the point of the story, but on the first day, they agreed, and I switched to the appropriate class. Then I took the Compilers class as one of my upper-division electives, which was tough but an excellent experience.)

      Anyway, the point is this: had I been younger and more naive or for other reasons believed that the advisor knew what they are talking about, I probably would have wasted a semester taking that class and put myself a semester behind. That would've cost me a great deal of money since I was paying for my own school and living mostly off my savings, and it would've served no purpose at all.

      So, my advice to most any college student is that you should never assume that a department advisor knows what they're talking about or has even made an effort to understand what your situation is or determine what is best for you. They do often have insight or knowledge into what the rules are and how the department works, and you should take advantage of that information. Sometimes they also have good advice based on experience. (Like "never take class X and class Y in the same semester" or something of that nature.) But don't ever assume that what they say is automatically the best course of action for you.

    18. Re:How about . . . by PaulDineen · · Score: 1

      No, the student would find a way to outsource the creation of that O(nlogn) algorithm to someone in India. Americans don't do engineering (or manufacturing) any more.

    19. Re:How about . . . by zerocool^ · · Score: 1


      Yeah, dude. Come to Virginia Tech. We're expanding our CS program, and we just moved from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Engineering, where we get better backing and more funding. We'll take care of you.

      Plus, we're a drinking town with a football program. There are 17 bars within 5 minute walking distance of campus.

      Bundle up if you're from New Oreleans, though. There's about 2 inches of ice that's accumulated this evening.

      //sysadmin, technical staff, CS department, VT.

      ~W

      --
      sig?
    20. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blood, sweat and tears? You make it sound as if ME is difficult, when it is actually the last stop for real engineering discipline dropouts before they quit all together and go to the business college.

    21. Re:How about . . . by atari2600 · · Score: 1

      Funniest post of the month. I swear to god. :)

    22. Re:How about . . . by Nyeh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i am a current tulane student and while it would be great to be able to talk to an advisor, in my experience our advisors just plain suck. in fact, my advisor decided to up and quit and never tell anyone, so when i emailed him a question regarding the classes that are equivalent to the ones i took at smu i got a response that was more or less: "sorry, i dont work for tulane anymore, i'm sure someone else will help you". did someone else help me? no. so really his best bet is an outside-ish source for help.

    23. Re:How about . . . by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      sure sports draw people to a college, but if the college doesn't have any academic substance, what's the point? Besides, we don't have fans that riot when we win a championship anyway...our teams aren't that good.

      The point is that schools in this country must be financially solvent, and must take whatever steps are necessary to achieve this. All of us regular citizens have to keep ourselves financially solvent too, or else we get evicted and have to live under a bridge, so of course this should apply to schools as well.

      Your problem seems to be the method by which the school is achieving this. It's simple: sports bring in money, and engineering doesn't. Look at the enrollment figures for engineering lately: they suck. Students aren't going into engineering any more, and for very good reason: it's a shitty profession. It has somewhat ok starting pay, but it ends quickly: there's no such thing as a raise, there's no such thing as long-term employment, and there's no such thing as greater experience making you more valuable. In a nutshell, our society has decided that it simply doesn't value engineering as a profession, or the work that engineers do, in order to pay them well, so in return less people are choosing this profession.

      Tulane is correctly seeing this, instead of falling for Corporate America's constant whining (not "whinging"--what is it with people and this misspelling) about not having enough engineers willing to work at rock-bottom prices, they're looking at enrollment and deciding that they're going to do what any smart business would do: cater to the customer. The customers, being the students, want to take majors other than engineering, so that's what the school is giving them.

      As for New Orleans and its rebuilding? Who cares! The rebuilding of NO and the need for engineers are completely unrelated. If NO needs engineers for rebuilding, it can just ship them in from Mexico or India or China. Just because the city needs rebuilding doesn't mean it needs all the workers to come from the USA. Besides, with projects like the Three Gorges Dam, China has shown that it's capable of civil engineering feats far beyond anything American engineers can accomplish. Yes, decades ago, America was the leader in engineering megaprojects, but nothing noteworthy has been done here along those lines for several decades now.

      Smart engineering students at Tulane will not move to other engineering schools, but instead will change majors to something that our society values more, such as law, medicine, real estate, or plumbing.

    24. Re:How about . . . by Grishnakh · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, dude. Come to Virginia Tech. We're expanding our CS program, and we just moved from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Engineering, where we get better backing and more funding. We'll take care of you.

      But only as long as you're paying tuition. After that, you're on your own, and if you're lucky you'll get a low-paying dead-end engineering job at a big company.

      Don't go to VT's engineering program (or any other school's for that matter). Change majors to something better, like business, law, plumbing, or skycapping.

    25. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA Haha ha hahhha hah Ha hah . ha m hqah aha A M HA Haha ha hahhha hah Ha hah . ha m hqah aha A M HA Haha ha hahhha hah Ha hah . ha m hqah aha A M

      you r teh mron!>ASD

    26. Re:How about . . . by Moofie · · Score: 1

      My undergrad advisor in the aerospace program at UT let me sign up for three lab sections in a single semester. He was an evil old bastard. That semester sucked a LOT.

      However, all three of the (very attractive) women in my class were in my lab group for one of those classes. That wasn't so bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    27. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Well, they're at his school and they're going to have a much better clue about what the school is offering and how he can use those services than a bunch of random slashdotters who don't know a thing about his school (and many who have either never been or haven't been to college in eons).


      Apparently you never met my advisor. I'd listen to Cowbow Neal first.

    28. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true!

      Unfortunatly, most of the stuff to know is either not true or created from peoples imagination. The tricky part is telling the difference between important and unimportant knowledge. Slashdot readers sucks at this.

    29. Re:How about . . . by RESPAWN · · Score: 1
      Hey, if you do get that refund can you let me know? I, uh, could really use that extra $120,000 after Katrina wiped out my finances...

      The reality of it is that this doesn't necessarily mean that our degrees are worthless. Maybe I'm just not seeing things clearly, but many of my friends have been saying the same thing. It's not like we didn't have the professors there when we did actually get our degrees. The facts are that we do have degrees from accredited programs (even Computer Science finally got accredited last year or the year before, retroactive for several years before the accreditation) and the fact that the programs are being eliminated doesn't change a thing.

      Beleive me, I am angry too and really don't see myself donating money to the school now, but I do still have a degree. It was earned under full professors in an accredited program at a large private university. Those are the facts, and they will not change, even if Tulane deicdes to shut its doors entirely.

      Still, if you do manage to get a refund, let me know since I that money would be really nice right about now. Right now, I would suggest the course of action that I recommended to all of my friends last night -- advice which I took myself: drink. Or maybe I was just been living in New Orleans for too long.

      --- A (somewhat less) proud 2003 CS Alumni

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    30. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to be sarcastic? Let the advisors do what they are good at. Enrolling classes. Want advice find career services or a professor.

    31. Re:How about . . . by alienw · · Score: 1

      Actually, engineering can pay very well and has very good job stability -- if you are any good at it. Of course, most people are absolutely no good at it, even if they do slog it through their BS. Sure, you can complain all you want about engineers from India or whereever, but the main thing is that Americans are much worse at it than most people from India or China. Just look at who goes to get their MS (which is really the basic requirement for a true engineer).

      True, you are not going to get 6-figure salaries with a BS. With a graduate degree, it's very much doable.

      If you think everyone can be a lawyer or a doctor, think again. The only reason those professions are well-paid is because their trade organizations create an artificially limited supply.

    32. Re:How about . . . by N6546R · · Score: 1

      What's really a slap in the face is that Tulane has announced that their NCAA participation will not be interrupted. Football, basketball, and other mindless sporting activies are obviously more valuable than academic studies. This is an incredible insult to the 180+ faculty who are losing their jobs, and to the remaining faculty and student body.

    33. Re:How about . . . by GodsFlaw · · Score: 1

      I would reiterate NOLAs advice to run. His last paragraph hits it on the head. Good faculty will be gone soon and you will have no budget. The only thing I have to add is that transferring will not be a problem. Other schools will have heard and will understand why you are transferring. Look for a school that is willing to transfer in most of your credits. As a second year this should not be much of a problem.

    34. Re:How about . . . by MythryN · · Score: 1

      Why bring up sports? The issue is lack of money. Sports is probably making money for the school so why cut that? I agree that there is an overemphasis on sports in this country when it gets to university but this is missing the point.

    35. Re:How about . . . by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      That doesn't mean they're anything other than completely worthless.

      Here, here. Like my first advisor, who after hearing me talk about how much I loved math and science, told me I'd be a perfect fit for the Computer Information Systems major (in the business school). I changed majors after the first day of the semester, when I discovered that the class syllabus peaked at learning how to do column operations in Excel. Side note: the CompSci department head was pretty surprised to get a student wanting to transfer from CIS to CSC. He said most students were going the other direction.

      Fortunately, I was already taking the same first-year calc class as the CompSci majors, and the rest of my schedule was general ed stuff. I was one of the lucky ones. I learned early into my school career to only take advice from teachers and staff that I personally knew and trusted; I can't even remember who my official counselor was supposed to be.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    36. Re:How about . . . by NOLAChief · · Score: 1

      No they aren't. That flap came up a couple of years ago when cowen was threatening to shut the football program down. Intercollegiate sports at Tulane is a money losing proposition. They regularly raid the funds of academic programs to keep the sports teams afloat.

    37. Re:How about . . . by sirinek · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression Computer Science was accredited, but it was Computer Engineering that was not. At least that was the case in the early 90's when I was a CS student at Tulane.

      BSCS '95

    38. Re:How about . . . by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I mangled the words. Computer Science has indeed been accredited for quite some time, where as Computer Engineering just received its accreditation sometime within the last year or 2. This was retroactive to a few years prior to the actual accreditation as well. I can't say how far back the retroaction goes, but I do know that the Computer Engineers I graduated with in '03 are covered.

      95 was a long time ago. Was Dr. Benard as much of a fixture then as he was when I graduated? He was by far the best instructor in the department.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    39. Re:How about . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ...sports bring in money, and engineering doesn't.

      Wrong and wrong! Sports spend more than they bring in. And as someone else pointed out, the Engineering schools brought in lots of nice government grants.

      College sports, except in very rare cases, are money losers. Tulane isn't one of those few schools that made money on sports.

      Apropos your post, the image word is "missed", which is what you did.

    40. Re:How about . . . by highlander62 · · Score: 1

      Bravo, I'm not an Alumni, in fact I have a CS degree. However, my daughter is an Electrical Engineer and I know what she went through to get that degree. Look, if you want to be an Engineer, xfer to another great Engineering school like GA Tech. The U.S. needs Engineers -- If you want to be one, don't make a mistake that you will regret later. Highlander62

    41. Re:How about . . . by Xylene2301 · · Score: 1

      Good Suggestion...ask the advisor, then probably do the opposite. My experience was that the advisor was only there to sandbag the unwary. The *only* person who really knows anything about this and has no agenda is a person called the Graduation Advisor and he or she is in the Records Dept. That's the person who tallies up the classes and hours and decides if you actually get out or not.

    42. Re:How about . . . by GaryZ · · Score: 1

      You deserve to vent. I'm sure the "Hotel and Casino Management" degree has been protected along with the degree in "Government Relations"...both programs geared toward creating dependency rather than wealth.

    43. Re:How about . . . by dprice · · Score: 1

      I'm another alumni of Tulane engineering, and I just heard this news today also. I got a degree in Electrical Engineering, one of the eliminated programs. I have plenty of work experience, so the degree from Tulane doesn't carry as much weight for me, but I really sympathize with your situation of just recently getting a degree in a now defunct program.

      What really infuriates me is that they did not spread the pain; they focused on engineering with great prejudice. The decision makers were probably not engineering majors. Most engineers are doing engineering or running companies, not running universities. Of all the programs being eliminated, only two are non-engineering (consumer marketing and sports science). The EE department has over 100 years of history, and was one of the first programs at Tulane. I remember seeing some antique equipment in the labs from the late 1800's. They are throwing away over 100 years of legacy, and killing my roots with the university. What university would kill off the entire computer science and computer engineering programs when computers are now so prevalent?

      With only two remaining disciplines, biomedical and chemical, the overall program will not be attractive to new freshmen. Many freshman are not sure which discipline to pursue, and without much choice they are likely to prefer other schools. And those who fund research are also going to prefer schools with strong multi-disciplined programs. It is a downward spiral.

  3. Finish first by biocute · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to stay for an extra year? Are you waiting for someone?

    My opinion is to graduate on time, if you want to continue studying, you can do some post-graduate courses branched out from your major.

    And if universities are cutting engineering courses, maybe by 2007 you will be in hot demand!

    1. Re:Finish first by alienw · · Score: 1

      Uh, dude, most universities weren't hit by Hurricane Katrina.

    2. Re:Finish first by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      And if universities are cutting engineering courses, maybe by 2007 you will be in hot demand! Just in time for me to graduate!

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    3. Re:Finish first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

  4. Stick with it! by joshjoneswas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The aggravation of switching schools is far too great. Many of your credits may not transfer and, as experience tells me, the relationships you have built with your professors thus far will work wonders in the senior year and beyond when it comes to those pesky deadlines and loads of work!

    1. Re:Stick with it! by meme_police · · Score: 1

      Same with changing majors at this point. Of the three options graduating on time is the most reasonable.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    2. Re:Stick with it! by aBum · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone who has switched schools, I can tell you the parent is completely correct. Plus in addition to all the lost credits you'll have (or should I say won't have), there's the problem with not having pre-req's for some classes and planing your schedule becomes a serious pain. Plus you have to be able to come up with every sylabus from nearly every class you've taken so the school you're going to can evaluate the course to see if they even will consider it equivalent to one of their courses. Plus it's not fun leaving friends behind to start fresh.

      All in all it's a rather traumatizing experience, but if you really want to switch you have go through it.

    3. Re:Stick with it! by grgyle · · Score: 1

      I disagree. As other posters have mentioned, faculty will be fleeing a sinking ship and any valuable personal contacts that may have been formed with faculty will be worthless 5 years down the road when he is trying to get recommendations and letters from a vanished department/faculty, or from adjuncts that rotate out every year.

      Switching schools is easy, I've done it a couple of times, and with still a couple of years left in your education, it is the contacts and bonds you make during your final quarters that will be most important for connections later. No one is going to give a rats ass about recommendations from your freshman calculus teacher when compared to a senior class faculty.

      Get out while you can!

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  5. engineering cut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link goes to a page that doesn't discuss engineering. Why do you think they will cut the engineering program???

    1. Re:engineering cut? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Because they don't have the resources to operate all their departments & are cutting those they don't consider "world-class." Apparently engineering falls into that category. All in the article...

    2. Re:engineering cut? by escialan · · Score: 1

      I find it quite ironic that one of the departments being cut is the civil engineering department.

  6. Do what your interested in. by Jeet81 · · Score: 0

    You don't have to switch majors just because your engineering college is reducing. Do what you are interested in and you will definitely do better in it. Even though everyone says that there are no jobs in computers but this industry is slowly but steadily picking up. Google for example hires 50 people every week (although most of them are PHDs). Do what you like and your interested in.

  7. What a degree is about by JonathanR · · Score: 1

    Remember that your University degree is a certificate confirming that you have the ability to learn.
    It is not a pre-vocational traineeship.

    How much you get out of it depends on your attitude and application. I don't think it really matters, in the medium to long term, what institution gave you a certificate.

    1. Re:What a degree is about by alienw · · Score: 1

      Go try to get a programming job with a degree in English and see how well you do.

    2. Re:What a degree is about by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      If you had an "english degree" (I presume you mean a Bachelor of Arts, English major, not a degree from an institution in England) and a portfolio of extra-curricular programming code/projects, I'm sure you'd have no problem getting graduate employment. At least you'd probably have some skills for writing concise, gramatically correct docco and specifications.

      . Of course, if you pursued an "english degree", chances are you wouldn't be interested in employment as a programmer. All the spellos and bad grammar would drive you 'round the twist.

    3. Re:What a degree is about by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      If you had an "english degree" (I presume you mean a Bachelor of Arts, English major, not a degree from an institution in England) and a portfolio of extra-curricular programming code/projects, I'm sure you'd have no problem getting graduate employment.

      Yes, you would. You would have to be far more talented and experienced than the usual CS grad, which would 1) be rare, and 2) raise the question of why you weren't a CS major in the first place.

      In general, employers desiring engineers hire people with training in, of all things, engineering. In the sciences and especially engineering, they teach real-world applicable knowledge, which you're expected to know on the job. Getting this outside of class is hard, and proving it much harder still.

    4. Re:What a degree is about by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Uh, you mean like Larry Wall? Who had a declared major of Natural and Artificial languages.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    5. Re:What a degree is about by Fausthero · · Score: 1

      but when an institution attracts not just for its academia, bu also its environment and ambiance as a significant part of its offer, it begs the question why Tulane is asking its students to pay tulane tuition while attending other (possibly inferior) schools. Since I've been at Tulane, their slogan has been: "Only in New Orleans, only at Tulane." Obviously that isn't true anymore.

    6. Re:What a degree is about by confusion+here · · Score: 1

      What does CS have to do with engineering?

      "If engineers built buildings the way programmers write programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization."

    7. Re:What a degree is about by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      What does CS have to do with engineering?

      At the BS level, CS basically == software engineering. At that level, CS is in no way a science.

    8. Re:What a degree is about by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see: Big house, check; Porsche, check; happy wife and child, check; pick and choose from a variety of jobs wherever I choose to live (so far: Chicago, Philadelphia, Portland): check. Currently making big zorkmids as a systems architect. And I don't even *have* the English degree -- I was hired out of college (for a programming gig) in the middle of my junior year. So year, you can do OK in the software world with an English degree. I certainly tend to do better than a lot of the CS grads, since I'm continually learning new stuff, not just hoping I make manager before the stuff I learned in school becomes obsolete.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    9. Re:What a degree is about by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy but I think U.S will greatly benefit if there are no more CS or any computer graduates for the next 10 years. This country lacks appreciation for good engineering and science to the point where posts like the above is practically true. CS is a field too abused in school and in the corporate world.

    10. Re:What a degree is about by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      I certainly tend to do better than a lot of the CS grads, since I'm continually learning new stuff, not just hoping I make manager before the stuff I learned in school becomes obsolete.
      Err... I hate to tell you, but actual Computer Science "stuff" doesn't get obsolete. Only the crappy vocational stuff they teach you at places like DeVry does that. Oh, and by the way:
      So year, you can do OK in the software world with an English degree.
      But apparently you can't proofread your sentences! ; )
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:What a degree is about by damsa · · Score: 1

      The guy is trying to do Air Force ROTC. If he is doing the same thing my friend was doing then, yes he needs to have a degree in some sort of sciences or engineering in order to get into a specific Air Force program.

    12. Re:What a degree is about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Because I would rather be using my degree, but simply can't afford the low salaries. Degree in English and Classics. Job title: Senior programmer.

    13. Re:What a degree is about by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      But apparently you can't proofread your sentences! ; )

      Busted! That's what I get for doing this stuff while I work -- next time, I'll bag work and pay attention! :)

      I hate to tell you, but actual Computer Science "stuff" doesn't get obsolete

      Well, kinda. Which are you more likely to do, write your own interpreter for a scripting language or just embed TCL/Scheme/Python/Perl? And are you going to write your own queueing code, or just use the Java/.NET/SourceForge QueueManager component? Sure, it's important to know language design and queueing theory, but it's often not expedient to actually use it to write code. I dare say that in another ten years, we'll have so many components in so many layers it'll be difficult to write bad code and impossible to write really good code in mainstream applications. Already we've got apps written in languages that run on JVMs that themselves emit CISC instructions that get translated to RISC opcodes before they're finally executed. And with the new trend to virtualization, even the RISC opcodes will be executing on a virtual CPU!

      I'm not bashing the CS curriculum, just that a lot of the degreed CS folks I've worked with had trouble keeping up with the changes in technology, their knowledge of "stuff" notwithstanding.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  8. Why? by breadiu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why say in a program that's going to be cut? The reputation (past and future) of your degree reflect on you. It would be advantageous to matriculate into a program that's going to remain strong for the foreseeable future.

    1. Re:Why? by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "a program that's going to remain strong for the foreseeable future"

      One of the basic concepts of science and engineering is time. What comes later has no effect on what's happening now.

      If MIT or CalTech were to blow up tomorrow, would it mean that last year's grads will suddenly lose their knowledge? Of course not.

      If you're serious about doing your engineering job correctly, then you should never favor perception over reality. I find your post highly ironic.

    2. Re:Why? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Only if he's going to grad school. In the real world you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who cares about the strength of a program over the strength of the overall university. You can graduate from Stanford in computer science of all things and still get employed on the strength of the Stanford name. No one cares if the comp sci program is crap. And for graduate school admissions, 90% of his leverage is going to be letters from profs + test scores. So if he's looking at grad school, he should make sure he will have those 3 letters, and it otherwise won't matter what happens to his program.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Why? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I know you meant it as a hypothetical but I found your comment funny as Stanford is considered to have one of the best CS programs in the nation.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  9. Too many engineers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Finally one university that clues in to the problem of oversupply of engineers?

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Too many engineers by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not so much cluing in to the problem as surrendering to the inevitability that we can't compete with the rest of the world in the field?

    2. Re:Too many engineers by castoridae · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is this inevitable? We have the best post-secondary eduction. The most resources to throw at engineering projects. The biggest market for those projects. IMHO, also the most creative and solidly reliable engineers.

      Sure other countries (China, India) have *more* engineers. But I firmly believe that quality beats quantity. And as those engineers get better, well, they're going to come to the U.S. for a competitive salary. And then, guess what - they are on "our team."

    3. Re:Too many engineers by Necromancyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Tulane is cutting a ton of programs because of the hurricane and the fact that they spent nearly all of their reserves repairing to be able to open next year.

    4. Re:Too many engineers by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      oversupply of engineers
      You have an undersupply of engineers in the USA - management just don't realise that.

      Back when I was doing failure analysis of power station parts my job was made very easy by a list of easily avoidable mishaps that had happened in US power stations. I could look at almost any problem that came up and then find a well documented US example where it was ignored until it caused a complete shutdown of a plant - even problems that are trivial to fix in the early stages and easily identified YEARS before the become a serious problem. Homer Simpson may not be able to spot problems, but he's cheaper in the short term.

    5. Re:Too many engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't *enough* engineers, IMO. If an engineer isn't covering their salary 5x or better every year, they're not trying (or the business is doing so poorly nothing could save it). Plus, an engineering education is right handy at a lot of other things outside the classes and equations you learn.

      The only reasons I can see why one would think there are too many engineers are if one didn't understand what engineers really do (it's not just drink coffee, eat donuts, and fill out TPS reports) or if one was interested in people using tools blindly instead of understanding them (some management, some politicians).

      I am an engineer, and while I may be more expensive than someone overseas, it's still not worth having someone commute from Asia to hang out on our factory floor...so I'm not useless yet.

    6. Re:Too many engineers by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      No, note CowboyNeal's tagline:
      from the in-the-wake-of-disaster dept.
      Tulane University is in New Orleans. It might be more accurate if the headline read "Hurricane Katrina Reduces Tulane's Engineering School." TFA doesn't mention engineering specifically, and I wouldn't be surrpised if all programs shy of medicine/nursing have been reduced.
    7. Re:Too many engineers by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      You see, there was this thing with a broken levee in New Orleans that caused a lot of problems. You might have heard about it in the news. The thing is, that levee was made by civil engineers. Obviously, if civil engineers can't handle a simple levee, then maybe it's time they stood back and let liberal arts majors have a crack at it. Tulane is going to be supplying those liberal arts majors.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    8. Re:Too many engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      then maybe it's time they stood back and let liberal arts majors have a crack at it.

      That's already been tried. The levees were never properly developed because politicians have never allocated the funds over the past century or so. Most politicians are lawyers, and most lawyers start off as liberal arts majors.

    9. Re:Too many engineers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I see. New Orleans will take decades to recover from that mess. In fact, it may never recover and may die a slow and horrible death as a city. Anyhoo, if one has to work as a truck driver or framer, an engineering degree is quite useless. A 4 year EE degree actually makes it more difficult to find work, so when I apply for work, I describe my degree as a 3 year Comp Sci instead. Nobody has ever asked to see the degree certificate anyway...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    10. Re:Too many engineers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Sure, I agree with your sentiment, but that doesn't negate the fact that according to IEEE, there are 50,000 EEs that are out of work in the USA. That is one hell of a lot of engineers - equivalent to many years of engineer output of all the US universities.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    11. Re:Too many engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me tell you, as someone who is constantly trying to *hire* engineers, the current
      market conditions in North America are clearly a *shortage* of engineers. Not a
      small shortage mind you -- more like a crisis situation that significantly impacts
      the growth of companies that need technical talent.

      I keep hearing people whining about outsourcing, but in reality I doubt more than 1% of
      engineering jobs have moved overseas. Moreover, as India and China's economies grow, they
      will more than consume their domestic production of engineering talent, and *further*
      draw down North America's meager supply.

      So - the future for engineers seems bright to me. What I can't figure out is why
      enrollment in relevant degrees (ENGG, CPSC) is down?? Do people not *want* to make
      the large salaries that come with a supply shortage? Does anyone *seriously* believe
      that outsourcing is a credible threat? Is Lou Dobbs still pounding his idiot drum on CNN?
      Does anyone (with enough brains to get through an engineering program) care?

    12. Re:Too many engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an Devry shill payed to drum-up enrolment?

    13. Re:Too many engineers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, if he were a DeVry shill he wouldn't be talking about engineers, he'd be talking about the hardware equivalent of MCSE's.

    14. Re:Too many engineers by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      That's a BS excuse. The problems in New Orleans were ultimately caused BY the levees, which ejected river silt directly into the Gulf of Mexico.

      If smaller levees had been built, the city would suffer from periodic floods, but the coastal marshes would have expanded and absorbed much of the storm surge. The delta has been growning for millions of years worth of Mississippi River silt deposits... ...Until we built those levees, which cause 25 square miles of land to melt into the Gulf every year.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    15. Re:Too many engineers by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hopefully New Orleans will wither away and New New Orleans built on the high ground overlooking the old city will flourish.

    16. Re:Too many engineers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Hmm, *is* there high ground there? or do they have to move 100 miles inland?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    17. Re:Too many engineers by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I saw a little map somewhere showing the flooding. There was lots of high ground. You couldn't have the particular combination of river AND coast, but it seems like that wouldn't be such a bad compromise to avoid periodic complete destruction. Maybe not even high ground, but POSITIVE elevation seems like it might be wise.

    18. Re:Too many engineers by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Then why the fscking hell did they build homes below sea level? Who is the retard that started and approved that?

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    19. Re:Too many engineers by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't really get it either. Of course, I live in a place where we don't have any natural disasters.

      Wikipedia says that 45% of the city is above sea level. These are the older parts, including the French Quarter. The newer parts of the city, developed since 1900, are the ones that are actually below sea level, including one of the lowest points in the US. People do choose to to the strangest things and build their houses in the strangest places.

    20. Re:Too many engineers by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What world are you living in?

      First, we don't have that many resources to throw at engineering projects. How many huge engineering projects have we undertaken in the last 3 decades on the scale of the Three Gorges Dam in China, or the twin towers at Kuala Lumpur? We haven't done anything noteworthy for a long time.

      The biggest market? How so?

      Creative and solidly reliable? Who cares? Companies aren't paying them enough to stay in the field, and are happily hiring engineers in other countries instead. So apparently, you're in the minority with your belief that US engineers are somehow better.

      Coming to the US for a competitive salary? Are you nuts? The tide is turning already, and Indian engineers are going back home. The cost of living in the USA is utterly outrageous, and the higher salaries paid here aren't nearly enough to make up for the difference. Engineers in India can easily afford to hire multiple servants. I can't afford that! I couldn't even dream of having my own servants. The quality of life an Indian engineer can have now is far beyond what he can have in the US, and the message is getting out to them.

      As for "our team", the foreign engineers that are here aren't here to stay. They're saving up their US Dollars while they're still worth more than Rupees (for the same reason that dot-com stocks were worth so much--it's a bubble), and they're going to take all that cash and move back to India when they have enough.

    21. Re:Too many engineers by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      then maybe it's time they stood back and let liberal arts majors have a crack at it.

      That's already been tried. The levees were never properly developed because politicians have never allocated the funds over the past century or so. Most politicians are lawyers, and most lawyers start off as liberal arts majors.


      Yes, and this approach was resoundingly successful. Why? Those politicians are all still employed, and are making very handsome salaries (partly through "campaign contributions"). Obviously, society feels that these politicians' actions were entirely appropriate, because society has rewarded them accordingly.

    22. Re:Too many engineers by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      He's obviously something similar, because his post was the biggest pile of stinking horseshit I've read here in a while.

      I'm an engineer, and I see the problem with hiring constantly. We want to hire more engineers, but we only want engineers who have extremely specific experience. Of course, the perfect candidate who has this extremely rare experience, and is willing to move to our location, and is willing to accept our pathetic compensation package, simply doesn't exist. So we cry "shortage!"

      I'm trying to hire some servants to keep my house clean, clean my toilets and kitty litter, run errands, etc., and I need ones that will do excellent work while being paid only $1 per day. For some strange reason, I can't find any, but when I complain to people about there being a shortage of workers like this, they all look at me funny. I wonder why....

    23. Re:Too many engineers by HardCase · · Score: 1

      How many huge engineering projects have we undertaken in the last 3 decades on the scale of the Three Gorges Dam in China, or the twin towers at Kuala Lumpur?

      Oh, we've got the resources to do the job. But there will never be a Three Gorges Dam type project in the US because the environmental lobby will never let it happen. The towers in Kuala Lumpur - not until the US is land-poor, which will be a long time from now. The US got out of the skyscraper as a symbol of power a long time ago, the Freedom Tower notwithstanding.

      The tide is turning already, and Indian engineers are going back home. The cost of living in the USA is utterly outrageous...

      Maybe on the east and west coasts, but not where I live - none of the ex-pat engineers who work at my company (Fortune 500 with over 20,000 employees) are making a rush to leave the country. Sure, if you want to live where it's expensive, you may find that you're in a pinch, but it's not just engineers that feel the pinch, it's everyone!

      As for "our team", the foreign engineers that are here aren't here to stay. They're saving up their US Dollars while they're still worth more than Rupees (for the same reason that dot-com stocks were worth so much--it's a bubble), and they're going to take all that cash and move back to India when they have enough.

      Obviously you have a different view than I do. Mine is from the people who work with me. Probably 40% are Indian, Pakistani or Nepalese and none of them have any plans of going "home". A few are working to become US citizens, the rest are happy to have a green card or H1B and stay here. Sure, they could get an engineering job back in their home country, but standard of living and quality of life are two different things. The running joke is the myth of the Indian engineer who always plans to move back home but never quite makes it.

      And as far as companies not paying engineers enough to keep them in the field, that just doesn't stand up to what I've seen at my company and from what I've heard from others at their companies. At my company, we have a hard time finding qualified engineers at all, regardless of where they come from. The pay and benefits are good, above the national average for degree and experience, but the talent pool is rather small. I guess that there are plenty of engineers out there, but maybe not so many good engineers - at least not by my company's standards. Finding one makes it worth the extraordinary hassle that it takes to go through all the immigration rigamarole to bring in a non US citizen.

      By the way, when I say "engineer", I mean "electrical engineer". Dunno about any other discipline.

      -h-

    24. Re:Too many engineers by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Sure, they could get an engineering job back in their home country, but standard of living and quality of life are two different things. The running joke is the myth of the Indian engineer who always plans to move back home but never quite makes it.

      The standard of living is rising quickly in India. They're not moving back in droves yet, but the tide is slowly turning, and less are coming here and more are staying home. I predict that this trend will continue, with the US becoming a less and less popular destination as the standard of living continues to rise in India, and the Dollar continues to devalue.

      And as far as companies not paying engineers enough to keep them in the field, that just doesn't stand up to what I've seen at my company and from what I've heard from others at their companies. At my company, we have a hard time finding qualified engineers at all, regardless of where they come from. The pay and benefits are good, above the national average for degree and experience, but the talent pool is rather small. I guess that there are plenty of engineers out there, but maybe not so many good engineers - at least not by my company's standards. Finding one makes it worth the extraordinary hassle that it takes to go through all the immigration rigamarole to bring in a non US citizen.

      This doesn't make any sense at all. Wages for engineers are flat, and have been since the dot-com boom. (They were flat before that, too, and for most engineering sectors were flat then as well, just not the online stuff.) If good engineers are in such a shortage, why do companies never give huge raises to the ones that prove their worth? Companies will give decent starting salaries to engineers, but that's it. After that, it's all downhill. If good engineers were hard to find, and highly valued, we'd be reading about $100k+ (or really, $200k-300k+) salaries being the norm for experienced engineers. But instead, it's common knowledge that the best and easiest way to get a substantial raise is to just quit and go to another company.

      We've had a hard time finding "qualified" people at my company too, in the several groups I've been in. But then again, we have a list of requirements as long as your arm. If you're not an expert in the exact specialty we need, with experience with all the exact languages and software packages we use, we're not interested. We don't want to spend a single day training someone or waiting for them to come up to speed. No wonder so many EEs are unemployed; if you can't find that perfect-fit position, you're out of luck in this industry. Once we do find a candidate that meets enough requirements, HR then takes a whole month to make them an offer, and they've found another job somewhere, so we have to start our process over again, looking for an overspecialized candidate. Once we find another one, and HR gets an offer out in time, then the offer is only "competitive", and not really impressive (considering we are looking for someone with highly specialized knowledge), so they don't bother taking the offer.

      Why is it companies want the cream of the crop, but are only willing to pay "industry average" salaries for them? Does this make any sense to you?

      By the way, when I say "engineer", I mean "electrical engineer". Dunno about any other discipline.

      Yep, I'm an EE.

    25. Re:Too many engineers by castoridae · · Score: 1

      What world are you living in?

      In this context, the world of American software engineering.

      First, we don't have that many resources to throw at engineering projects. How many huge engineering projects have we undertaken in the last 3 decades on the scale of the Three Gorges Dam in China, or the twin towers at Kuala Lumpur? We haven't done anything noteworthy for a long time.

      This isn't really about doing giant "noteworthy" civil engineering projects. Those are showpieces, but they don't make up a significant portion of the nation's overall engineering output. The official numbers for the Three Gorges Dam are $25b over 15 years, or $1.6b per year. The iPod alone generates more revenue, and that 's just one consumer product. (Yes, I realize this isn't quite apples to apples, but I think it's close enough for illustration). And that's the point - consumer products, automated services - that's all part of engineering, too.

      The biggest market? How so?

      Markets are defined by $ not by number of people. Don't be fooled by all the buzz in the media about the rapid growth of China & India. They are growing rapidly, true. But the U.S. economy is still much bigger than both combined. And (debate for another thread, perhapse) that growth will slow, as they start to approach U.S.-levels of development - this economic growth is a non-linear curve.

      Creative and solidly reliable? Who cares?

      Any engineering manager should. I firmly believe that one superstar engineer can outperform a mediocrity by an order of magnitude.

      Companies aren't paying them enough to stay in the field, and are happily hiring engineers in other countries instead. So apparently, you're in the minority with your belief that US engineers are somehow better.

      Um, what field are they going into? Last I check, engineering is still a pretty lucrative field. Although I hear burger-flipping and retail sales are really growing fast. (j/k)

      For my own selfish reasons, I hope I'm in the minority. That way I have a bigger pool of top engineers to hire from. But from the perspective of a US patriot, I really hope that I'm not in the minority.

      Coming to the US for a competitive salary? Are you nuts? The tide is turning already, and Indian engineers are going back home.

      The U.S. still has a large net import of imigrees/emigrees. QED

      As for "our team", the foreign engineers that are here aren't here to stay. They're saving up their US Dollars while they're still worth more than Rupees (for the same reason that dot-com stocks were worth so much--it's a bubble), and they're going to take all that cash and move back to India when they have enough.

      So what? For every $ they earned, an American company earned more. (If not, that company took a loss & isn't long for the world). And that money earned by the American company typically represents value created for that company's (usually American) customers.

    26. Re:Too many engineers by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      You have an oversupply of engineers in the US if you prefer to buy them cheap from India and China. :-(

      What that does for the national interest, I dunno, but multinational corporations are cutting themselves free from that kind of concern, anyway.

  10. Switch majors? by castoridae · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would seem that you're not committed to Computer Science, since you're willing to switch majors. That said, if Tulane is cutting that program, it seems they don't consider it to be an area "where it has attained, or has the potential to achieve, world-class excellence." Assuming you don't have a strong preference as to your major, why not pick something that Tulane does consider world-class?

    If you have an engineering bent, I would think that civil engineers are going to be in hot demand there for quite some time. Seriously.

    1. Re:Switch majors? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      My bad... looks like Civil Engineering was cut too.

    2. Re:Switch majors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't diss the original author for considering a change of majors. CS might not be the best fit for this individual after all, and it's also possible that in changing schools, the new school might have a similar, but differently named/structured, program that would be a better fit. I was a EE major in the early 70's and earned a BSEE. But, I was able to eventually morph myself into a software engineer for a major, well-known, NYSE-listed computer vendor. As a sophomore, there's some time to adjust majors, and a good engineer has a broad background in many major engineering disciplines. I'm not a civil engineer, but in my CE class, Statics, I learned that you can't push a rope, for example. Sound dumb? No - it's a matter of paying attention to the polarity/direction/sign of the force, Luke.

      However, I would *strongly* recommend transferring to another university ASAP, given that Tulane is in such a state of flux. They aren't doing you any favors by pulling the rug on your degree program, and I can't see spending the time and money (regardless of the source of the latter, be it scholarships, work-study funding, grants or money from mommy and daddy) on a program that the college itself isn't fully committed to. I suspect that another university worthy of consideration would be quite understanding of your situation - your transfer application is based on probably the best possible reason(s).

      So, go out and do your homework of selecting a new and better degree program. Don't be afraid to spend an extra semester or two in school, if necessary, to get the degree you really want, assuming funding isn't an extraordinary burden. It's well worth it in the long run!

    3. Re:Switch majors? by castoridae · · Score: 1

      Nothing was meant as a diss - that talk about "world-class" is verbatim, right from the article.

      I agree completely with what you say about being able to morph yourself into different disciplines, and any engineering major giving the basic analytical skillset. My degrees were in electrical engineering, but I've never worked in that field - have always been in the software industry in roles ranging from hardcore engineer, to management, to sales monkey.

  11. How did this get posted? by mainsail · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now Slashdot is an academic advising website?

    1. Re:How did this get posted? by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now Slashdot is an academic advising website?

      Since the only thing most advisors do is apply their experience to your situation, yes.

      Maybe a roomful of academic advisors can match the cross section of experiences you'll get from a front page slashdot post.

      He's not just asking "what should I do with the next few years of classes," he's also asking "how is this going to affect my life"

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:How did this get posted? by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      I need to figure out what classes to take next semester, can anybody help me?

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    3. Re:How did this get posted? by rpg25 · · Score: 1

      I think it's of general interest when a major regional university like Tulane thinks it's a good idea to kill its engineering programs. This is another warning sign about the status of science and engineering in the United States. It's like a canary in a coal mine.

      Science and engineering enrollment at the undergraduate level has been pretty feeble for a long time now.

  12. who are your professors? by coyote-san · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who are your professors? You're worried about graduating, they're worried about getting (or keeping) tenured positions. Who will be around to teach your final classes?

    This shouldn't be your primary consideration, but it needs to be on the table.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  13. Where are you now? Transfer and finish early. by evw · · Score: 1

    Didn't Katrina shut the university down? Did you transfer somewhere else? I would think there's something to be said for continuity. You should think about transfering.

    Furthermore, the article says:

    The university will focus its undergraduate, professional and doctoral programs and research in areas where it has attained, or has the potential to achieve, world-class excellence. It will suspend admission to those programs that do not meet these criteria.

    i.e. if your program is one of the ones being cut then the university doesn't feel you were getting a very good education to begin with. Again, perhaps a transfer is the right answer.

    Finally, I agree with the others about getting the degree then studying more. I delayed my degree by one year and got a masters and bachelors in the same year. Do any employers care? No. They just want to know how many years since your bachelors. That determines where you fall on the salary curve for the rest of your life. If you delay your degree by one year, you'll get paid slightly less every year.

  14. Transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd transfer schools. A school that has to cut majors to keep up a budget, is probably cutting things in other areas as well. Probably not the best school to be sending money to.

  15. greatly reduced? by fireduck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    according to this chart, the only engineering remaining is chemical and biomedical. everything else (Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Computer Engineering) gets cut. That's an extremely dramatic cut.

    My suggestion is to leave ship. Sure you could stick it out, but with the program being eliminated, there's little incentive for faculty to stay (they'll all be looking for jobs elsewhere), and less incentive for the school to spend money on student support (computers, etc.). End result is that you'll likely have a lot of classes taught by part-time folks who are being recruited at the last minute when every untenured junior faculty doesn't show up for spring semester (because they've also abandoning ship).

    1. Re:greatly reduced? by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      You can bet the remaining engineering courses will get cut eventually.

      You don't really want to graduate with an engineering degree from a school who's claim to fame is their "awesome" womens studies major.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    2. Re:greatly reduced? by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Actually the other engineering disciplines, the ones that are left, probably will not get cut. Biomedical Engineering, and Chemical Engineering integrate much better with the "traditional" sciences (Chemistry, Biology, etc.) than do the rest of the engineering programs. Tulane will just have to hire a professor to teach the few odd-ball classes such as Circuits I & II. Traditionally only engineering students took these classes since they were requirements and most non-engineering students learned all they needed to know about circuits in Physics. They state the degree requirements will remain the same so this professor will probably also be the CS101 (C programming class) that is also a pre-req for all engineering majors. Or they will just cut that requirement in the future. Suffice it to say that Chemical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering will integrate much more neatly into the future Science and Engineering school.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  16. Err.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the article.... Engineering school is not mentioned, is it?

  17. A Suggestion by Parafilmus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you want more school, go for a Master's degree. It's only 30 more hours. Why take another year undergrad, when you can get another degree for about the same number of hours?

    1. Re:A Suggestion by CardiganKiller · · Score: 1

      Of course with a masters degree, taking 6 hours of classes is generally considered full time, and you need special permission to go about 12 or so. So we're talking about two full years. I'm taking nine hours right now, and it sure ain't the load nine hours in undergrad would be, sheesh! I took at least fifteen hours every semester in my undergraduate studies, and nine hours right now seems about the same work load.

    2. Re:A Suggestion by dbIII · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      If you want more school, go for a Master's degree. It's only 30 more hours.
      Is that true? Has US education really declined that much? Not only do you have to check that US graduates didn't get something from a degree mill, postgraduate students from a reputatable university don't have a minimum one year for a masters like in other countries so we have to ignore that qualifiaction as well?
    3. Re:A Suggestion by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid? The number of hours has nothing to do with the time it takes to get a degree. Masters typically take 2 years to get. Geez, what University system did YOU go to?

    4. Re:A Suggestion by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not only do you have to check that US graduates didn't get something from a degree mill, postgraduate students from a reputatable university don't have a minimum one year for a masters like in other countries so we have to ignore that qualifiaction as well?

      Perhaps you have you are not famaliar with the credit hours standard which is common amongst United States colleges and universities. The GP is talking about 30 additional credit hours, not clock hours. A typical courseload is 15 credit hours per semester, 30 hours is usually a full year. Thus, one year plus 30 credit hours adds up to a full 2-year program. 2-year masters programs are fairly common in the United States.

      --

      -Turkey

    5. Re:A Suggestion by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean 30 hours of total work. That's 30 "credit hours" which means 30 hours of lectures/whatnot PER week over the course of a semester. Ofc, that 30 hours is probabably going to be split over multiple semesters in order to be managable since the "30 hours" doesn't include the massive workload that professors expect to be done or studying or anything. In short "30 hours" in this context probably doesn't mean what you think it does.

    6. Re:A Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you made the stupidest comment I have seen on Slashdot in a long time. And that is really saying something.

    7. Re:A Suggestion by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you're doing a course based masters you'll have to do more than 30 credits. If you're not, there's this little thing called research that takes up an inordinate amount of time.

  18. Switch to MIT! by putko · · Score: 0

    I recommend you get your degree from MIT, Berkeley, Stanford, etc.

    People probably won't remember Tulane after a while, but those schools will still have engineering programs and a good reputation.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:Switch to MIT! by ThaFooz · · Score: 1

      I recommend you get your degree from MIT, Berkeley, Stanford, etc. People probably won't remember Tulane after a while, but those schools will still have engineering programs and a good reputation.

      It's easy to reccomend the top 3 CS Universities on the planet, but it assumes that money isn't a concern and getting in is a piece of cake (I don't care how smart you are... unless you're fabulously weathly/alumni relative/favored by affermative action, your chances of being accepted just aren't great). There are plenty of state schools with great reputations that offer almost as much at a fraction of the cost (the reputation of the program matters a lot more than the prestige of the University to any good HR person). Education is what you put into it, and it doesn't take long for your work experience to overshadow your education backround. Coming out debt free (or close to it) is a MAJOR plus too.

    2. Re:Switch to MIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent +1e6 Insightful. Everyone should go to one of these three schools, and if you don't get in (too poor, bad grades, etc...) just do the Darwinian thing and eliminate yourself from the genepool. Remember to cut along the vein, not across.

    3. Re:Switch to MIT! by Reverberant · · Score: 1
      It's easy to reccomend the top 3 CS Universities on the planet, but it assumes that money isn't a concern

      I can't speak for Berkley and Stanford, but MIT is need-blind. If you meet the qualifications, MIT will help you to pay tuition. And, the poorer you are, the more likely that 'help' will consist of grants rather than loans.

    4. Re:Switch to MIT! by putko · · Score: 1

      MIT is amazing!

      I can't imagine anything else they could do to ensure that they'll get the very best from the entire world.

      Do MIT alumni tend to donate money to the School? Berkeley students are notoriously cheap.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    5. Re:Switch to MIT! by Reverberant · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine anything else they could do to ensure that they'll get the very best from the entire world.

      Hire some better professors? ;)

      In all seriousness, I had some great, great instructors. However, I also had a few professors who cared much more about their research money than teaching students. But I suppose it's the same at every school.

      Do MIT alumni tend to donate money to the School?

      I don't really know how much MIT alumni donate in relation to other schools - I suppose it's easy enough to research, but I'm too lazy to do the comparison. I will say that I'm generally cheap, and I've donated a few $hundred to the athletic department.

    6. Re:Switch to MIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people who went to Tulane are there because they couldnt get into any of these schools. If you got accepted to both MIT and Tulane where would you go? I would say MIT.

    7. Re:Switch to MIT! by bclark · · Score: 0

      Berkeley is a public school: no affirmative action. It's also huge and not too difficult to get into compared to the smaller private schools (Stanford, MIT, Ivies), though the engineering department is a slightly different story. However, it is almost as pricy as any of those schools for non-residents of California.

  19. Transfer to MIT by digitaldc · · Score: 1
    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  20. Site Summary by XanC · · Score: 5, Informative
    There's a lot of useless information to wade through to get the good data, so I'll summarize what happened. (As an alum in one of the cut programs, I've read through it all.)

    ~100 faculty laid off from the Medical School downtown. ~50 faculty laid off from the main uptown campus, nearly all from Engineering. Cut programs: Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Computer, and Computer Science. Remaining: Biomedical (which was, in fact, our strongest), and Chemical.

    Also, previously there were the School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the School of Engineering. Now it's going to the the School of Liberal Arts, and the School of Science and Engineering.

    Leaves me wondering where exactly I stand, having a recent degree in a program that no longer exists. I'm more worried about the kids who were planning to go back next semester in one of these programs, and only find out today that it doesn't exist!

    1. Re:Site Summary by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Gutting the medical school can't be good for the biomed program can it?

    2. Re:Site Summary by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The biomedical program is going to suck with no other engineering department, CS and a gutted med school. Here Biomed is a program, not a department. I have a CS BSc, am enrolled in the electrical engineering department, in the biomedical engineering program. Biomed is inherently cross disciplinary (bio-medical-engineering).

  21. I must be blind by i_c_andrade · · Score: 1

    but the word Engineering does not appear at all on that link. The only thing I can see that might even remotely have anything to do with submitter's comment is
    "It will suspend admission to those programs that do not meet these criteria."
    Oh wait, there it is. In the letters to studentds (grad and undergrad) Tulane just got rid of their EECS department.

    nice

  22. Faking it. by syntax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Tulane CS grad -- I think they're faking it. Tulane's CS program at least has always suckled at the teet of Netscape and Yahoo due to former students, like David Filo, being at the helm. This seems like yet another scheme to just pull money -- which honestly, they could use at this point -- out of their corporate sponsors.

    1. Re:Faking it. by NOLAChief · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you know, I hope they are. can never quite tell what's a moneymaking scheme and what's not with cowen. he's known for floating crap likely to be unpopular around the holidays and after finals when no one's looking. if he is faking it, it's a lot of ill will to kindle, though, and could backfire. i as an alum (ME '04) am furious and feeling alienated. like hell am i going to contribute any money to the tulane general fund. At least not until cowen is run out of town on a rail. were i a faculty member, i'd be polishing my resume anyway, not wanting to put up with this shit forever. and what does this say to the students? that you're not valued? apparently so.

    2. Re:Faking it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a May grad of the mechanical engineers in '05. I find it ridiculous that they claim the engineering school is not world class (at least in comparison to their other schools). I remember at one point Tulane Engineering was ranked 17 in the nation though I have no idea what it is now. This is for a school with underfunded labs and a large focus on theory instead.

      Its about money pure and simple. They spent the money on the B-school building the two knew buildings and its one of their best moneymakers. This for a school that has never ranked higher than 41 to my knowledge.

      Compare the Freeman building with the Mechanical Engineering building and you get a good idea. I don't think I have the answers but I don't think I would accept this if it was my decision.

    3. Re:Faking it. by cspring007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This seems like the same thing they pulled with the footbal program earlier this year. A lot of people think they are faking it. Scott Cowen has proven to be one of the most underhanded manipulative college presidents in history. I half think that he did this just so he could hold a press conference and claim that it was a historic restructuring of an american university. He actually said 'this is a move that will forever affect Tulane University for the next ten to twenty years' Another thing is that he is pushing his student community model, he's tried this before but it was rejected by the students. Right now, its just him and the board.. which eats out of his hand. I wish that the kids from yahoo and netscape would ante up some money to buy cowen out of Tulane.

    4. Re:Faking it. by dtfan579 · · Score: 1

      I second your feelings of alienation, as a fellow alum (CS '01). Before hearing this I was actually considering getting involved in the renewal process. Thanks for nothing Scott Cowen, Tulane University isn't getting a dime until you are gone.

  23. Leave by alienw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get the hell out of there as soon as you can. If they are cutting the program, the professors will be more worried about finding a new position than actually teaching. There aren't enough openings out there for a whole engineering department that is about to get cut.

  24. Uhh.... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tulane University to Reduce Engineering School
    ...Reduce it to what, rubble? Smithereens? A small puddle of goo?
    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Uhh.... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think Hurricane Katrina already did that.

    2. Re:Uhh.... by alexwcovington · · Score: 1

      To GOLD, via a redox reaction!

      Gold (I) Engineeride + Magnesium (II) Bureauacracide => Magnesium Engineeride (insoluble) + sold Gold + Bureauacracide ions

      Decant the solution into the Administration building, then separate the precipitates using aqua regia to dissolve the gold.

      --
      (It's never too late to join the Renaissance)
  25. Almost as bad by XanC · · Score: 1

    I've got to figure most of the buildings will be turned over to... liberal arts!

  26. Re:Where are you now? Transfer and finish early. by stuttering+stan · · Score: 1

    If you delay your degree by one year, you'll get paid slightly less every year.

    My boss asked me why I come into work 5 minutes late everyday. I told him that I was borned 5 minutes late and I haven't caught up yet.

  27. stick with Computer Science by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder, as a student who can graduate in May 2007 (the deadline for those students to still receive a degree in any of the cut majors) with a Computer Science degree, but wants to stay an extra year, should I transfer to another university, graduate on time, or switch majors?

    I would not reccomend changing majors. CS will be one of the most in demand majors this century. The reason I say that is because the internet is coming everywhere in the world and all the users will need software. As we go along this century, virtual reality environments will become common place for everyone. Currently, this trend is manifesting itself as the gaming industry. This industry will continue to grow as technology replaces most other jobs, gaming and software design will be the best jobs. Healthcare of course will also be good, but CS is the way to go if that's your thing. I know theres a lot of concern right now because the Nasdaq has gone down, but it's just short term. These things are always cyclical. Also, the concern with jobs migrating to India....don't worry about that. I've heard that salaries are rising fast and up to $40,000 per year fully loaded can be demanded by engineers in India. On top of this, the turn over rate is much higher and the quality standards are much lower. If you factor in the other costs of doing business in India, like opening offices, phone calls, etc. it's pretty much a wash when compared to many parts of the United States. There will be a big back-lash shortly. That's my prediction.

    --
    No Sigs!
    1. Re:stick with Computer Science by kabars_edge · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with the prior statement. Having worked in many Sr. positions, and at times, I was responsible for hiring, I believe the IT industry is drying up. People keep saying that IT jobs are suppose to continue to grow exponentially through 2010, but from my perspective I don't see it happening. There is a flood of well qualified IT/CS/CE people in the unemployment line or working a job well beneath their skill level. A dear friend of mine with a CS background is working in the Systems group at a major shipping company that only does troubleshooting and monitoring. Another friend of mine with a Computer Engineering background is working as a helpdesk technician. My suggestion would be to double major, CS and something else you can make your living at. Just MHO, but I hope it helps.

    2. Re:stick with Computer Science by Foerstner · · Score: 1

      The problem is, greater demand for software won't necessarily translate into more software jobs. Even if the number of internet users were to double in the next year, the software they'd need can be created simply by stamping out more CDs. Unlike transportation, medicine, manufacturing...virtually any other industry...increased demand for software can be met with little need for an increased headcount.

      With regards to the downturn...its unlikely that there will be a big hiring boom anytime soon. Experienced professionals can find work, but good luck getting a job fresh out of college. If you have student loans to pay off, you may find yourself in a tight spot.

      --
      The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    3. Re:stick with Computer Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is supposed to happen and what really happens are two (VERY DIFFERENT) things. I *HAVE* a CS degree. I *WAIT* in line for help desk jobs. There are *NO* junior people *ANYWHERE* in IT where I live. There are very *SENIOR* people in *ENTRY LEVEL* jobs. Yes, the person calling is saying 'my computer is stuck' and the person answering has a Masters Degree with 10+ years of experience (doing more than answering the phone). Repeat after me: CUT CUT CUT CUT CUT CUT. Outsource Outsource Outsource Outsource. You state "The projected job growth rate is blah blah blah". I state: reality says that IT/IS/CS is dying! Not projected, but in reality! The only people making real money in IT now, are putting on useless training courses. Suckers buy, the teacher makes money. Students leave fleaced, with 0 job prospects. In the 80's and 90's people overspent on IT. Noone wants to spend on IT anymore. Everyone already has an efficient system. They don't need anymore, and software doesn't wear out. Hardware does wear out (and manufacturers and engineers in India and China will eventually be more in demand than they are now).

    4. Re:stick with Computer Science by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Like I said we are in a cyclical downturn in the US, but this is a shorterm trend. I agree with your assessment that there are some people who are out of work. Most of the really good engineers are working though, but some of the people that were programmers during the late nineties are now working at Best Buy. However, the long term (10 - 20 years) trend is that all physical labor and simple jobs are being automated out. For instance, there used to be a person that checked me out at the grocery store. Now, there is a system that I scan items with and it tells me my total. Similarly, there used to be a job called file clerk. This is now largely done with databases today. This trend will continue. All of these sytems require software and support and there will be more and more of it as we go along. This is only going to create IT jobs. In fact, globally the IT hiring trend is not bad at all. The company I work for is hiring like crazy, only it's in the Czech Republic, Russia and India. Not much in the US. I explained in my previous post why this trend will tap out soon. Basically, their wages are rising, while ours are fairly stagnant here in the US. The workers are starting to get complacent in these places where the IT industry is booming and their salaries are going up. Soon we will be on an even playing feild and hiring will startup here too. So, to sum it up...we are in the process of automating all work and will continue to automate. You want to be on the side of the automaters as opposed to the automated. This is why IT will be one of the last jobs that can be automated by computers and why it is the right place to be.

      --
      No Sigs!
  28. "Duh" answer by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    They're stripping it of its oxygen atoms, replacing them with cut-rate hydrogen.

  29. Admission Letter in Hand... by wev162 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow, this must be a fairly recent decision. I received an admission letter for the undergrad EE program less than a month ago. Guess this solves my dilemma over whether to attend Tulane or not post Katrina...

    1. Re:Admission Letter in Hand... by XanC · · Score: 1

      They decided this today, which really leaves a lot of people in a bind, I would think...

    2. Re:Admission Letter in Hand... by wev162 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A decision as drastic as effectivly gutting half the university isn't going to be decided and announced in a day. A proposal as broad as this would have been considered for quite some time before announcement, I'm suprised there weren't any leaks or rumors ciculating beforehand. I'm sure there are many students left pondering their fate this evening and my best wishes to them, I only missed their plight by a matter of a year or so...

  30. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Orleans Breweries to announce massive job cuts.

  31. Change Major by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    I know it isn't a popular choice, but one I wish I had made now a couple years later. I graduated #1 in my major (IST, Information, Science, And Technology) at Penn State University. The number of job offers I received... 0. Zip. Zilch. Nada.

    I was unsuccessful in landing a decent job for over a year, and had to work at an ISP for barely any money. I now run the network at a decent sized community bank and make around $40k. Not bad, but also not too great for all the work I put in.

    I had doubts once the bubble burst, and I wish I had transferred to a Business or Criminal Justice major, which would have had more jobs available and always be in demand. I could have still minored in Computers and done just as well.

    The choice is yours, but the more I look back with 20/20 hindsight, I wish I had taken a different route even with over 11 years of computer knowledge and a love for tech.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:Change Major by damsa · · Score: 1

      You do realize that your degree and a computer science degree is not necessarily the same thing right?

    2. Re:Change Major by bonafidehan · · Score: 1

      So, CS majors are being bought up like there is no tomorrow at very high prices. The average CS major fresh out of college is getting multiple offers ranging from 70k to 90k. At least, that is what is happening at the top CS schools (MIT, Stanford, Berkley, CMU).

      Basically, you do well in CS in one of those schools and you're set for life, from the start.

      Your major isn't a CS major: that's why.

    3. Re:Change Major by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I would tell you to actually look into the IST degree at PSU before dismissing it. Not only is it very much equivalent to CS major, it custom tailors students for real work and is partnered and molded by just about all of the major corporations in some way. How much more of an "in" does one need?

      To graduate #1 from a very well known and highly regarded school such as Penn State and not have 1 offer is insane.

      Also, many of my friends were CS proper majors and have had the exact same fate as me... so the major title has nothing to do with it. Now, we do live in western PA which isn't a hotbed for tech, but it is still unbelieveable that there are no offers.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    4. Re:Change Major by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      I would tell you to actually look into the IST degree at PSU before dismissing it. Not only is it very much equivalent to CS major, it custom tailors students for real work and is partnered and molded by just about all of the major corporations in some way. How much more of an "in" does one need?

      To graduate #1 from a very well known and highly regarded school such as Penn State and not have 1 offer is insane.

      Also, many of my friends were CS proper majors and have had the exact same fate as me... so the major title has nothing to do with it. Now, we do live in western PA which isn't a hotbed for tech, but it is still unbelieveable that there are no offers. And even here for SR. Net Admins, etc. the average pay is $50-60k, not college grads.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    5. Re:Change Major by damsa · · Score: 1

      I didn't say your degree was less than CS or that it's not worth anything. But it is still not a Computer Science degree. It's a different program with emphasis on different things.

    6. Re:Change Major by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Again, actually it is not, it has numerous options and the student has the choice to take the exact same classes as a CS major. I'm not going to argue with you as I taught and developed for the program as well as graduated with a Bachelor's in it.

      Again, even still I have 4 close friends who graduated around the same time as me with CS degree's and similarly high GPA's and they are struggling. One is still at his "internship" job from 5 years ago, one is working as a software tester and making peanuts, one is unemployed and has been for a few months with no promising prospects, and one makes a decent amount of money but has to travel 100% of the time and works 24/7.

      Of all of us, I have the best job, and that is not saying much. I still believe a major in a more rooted field with a minor in CS along with a certification or two is all you need and allows for much greater flexibility in the job market. I do the hiring for my bank's IT dept. and I can say that of all the resumes and interviews I've done having a CS degree under education means NOTHING to us - and we are not alone here.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    7. Re:Change Major by damsa · · Score: 1

      I am sure your education was top notch. But certain sectors, you need to have a certain branded degree. This guy stated in another post that he is going into the Air Force, for certain career fields in the military, you need to have a degree that the military will recognize. Getting a history degree with a certification in developement may not be good enough. So depending on which career field he chooses, he also needs to choose what kind of degree to get. Also, if he chooses another career all together like patent law, it is also important that he goes and gets a computer science degree from a USPTO approved accredited Universitiy.

      From the IST.psu.edu page While majors like Computer Science prepare graduates to design and create computer software, majors like Computer Engineering prepare students to design and create computer hardware, and majors like Management Information Systems prepare graduates to become informed users of information technology, another way of thinking about the IST major is that it prepares graduates to bridge the gap that often exists in the workplace between the providers of information technology and the end users of the technology.

    8. Re:Change Major by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Information Science and Technology is closely associated with computer science in that it builds upon computer science theoretical foundations. IST provides an emphasis on such areas as computer networks, database development or administration, or internet development. It emphasizes state-of-the-art tools and technology and integration of technology for the end user.

      Again, not arguing, and I'm definitely done with this thread now. I was unaware of this person joining the army, but also:

      IST is recognized as an academic discipline by organizations such as the Computer Science Accreditation Commission (CSAC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF).

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  32. CS in Engineering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How did a Computer Science program find itself into the School of ENGINEERING? And it seems as if Electrical Engineering and CS are the same department? Huh? Heresy, I say, that's what that is :)

  33. Talk to your faculty advisors. by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 2, Informative

    A couple of things.

    First of all, once you've had your first job, no one really gives a crap where you went to school. They care about what quality of work you did at your last job. They care that you *did* go to school. That's about it.

    Second... someone talked about the 'reputation' of your school. No one cares. Tulane is a name-recognition school, and in most parts of the country no one will even know that it no longer has a CS program. They'll either recognize the school name or not. Did you know that UC Irvine has a great CS program? Or DeAnza College? I thought not. No one knows (or really cares mostly).

    What you should be worried about is what kind of education you're going to get in the next two years... because that's what's going to determine how you do at those first few jobs.

    Talk to your faculty advisors. Talk to the faculty. Find out which of them are staying and which of them are going to jump ship. It's reasonably likely that all the good CS staff will jump ship, since there's no longer going to be a career path at the school for them. No department = no research = no publishing = no career. That's what you should worry about -- losing all the good teachers.

    If the teachers are going, you should go. If they're sticking around until you're gonna graduate, stick around with them (assuming you like the place and the program).

    1. Re:Talk to your faculty advisors. by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

      It also depends on whether or not you have undergrad research projects in progress. How disruptive will it be to your degree program to change now? What advantages would you get from changing now?

  34. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares? Seriously.. transfer. Get some diversity.

  35. All too common. by Mspangler · · Score: 1

    The University of Idaho abolished the College of Mines and Earth Resources just a few year ago. The few programs left in that college were absorbed elsewhere, metallurgical engineering was redefined as materials science and so forth. It happens. Whether to stick it out or transfer is the big question, and depends on the gory details.

    About two year's ago, they had a re-evaluation, this quote from the article exists almost verbatim in the U of I's evaluation.

          "The university will focus its undergraduate, professional and doctoral programs and research in areas where it has attained, or has the potential to achieve, world-class excellence. It will suspend admission to those programs that do not meet these criteria."

    Sounds like the same consultants did the work. Be that as it may, small schools can't be competitive everywhere anymore, so they are consolidating. Soon they will be more colleges than universities. Whether this is good or bad is open to debate. Small liberal arts colleges continue to be important, maybe boutique schools are the wave of the future.

  36. ^BumP^ by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
    I'm with the parent on this one.

    I think the questions I'd like answered are:
    1. How are you paying for college
    2. What kind of impression have you made on your profs so far
    3. Is there anything keeping you from leaving
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:^BumP^ by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is slashdot, we don't bump, we grind.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  37. Rebuild smaller reduce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a reduction to rebuild as a smaller institution.

    Not everything will be, nor should it be, reconstructed to equivalence with pre-Katrina.

    If the engineering school cannot make its case for sufficient resources, I'm sorry, but you threw in your lot with a bad choice and you should probably transfer.

  38. Won't matter by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

    According to University President Scott Cowen of Tulane University, the School of Engineering will be greatly reduced. I have to wonder, as a student who can graduate in May 2007 (the deadline for those students to still receive a degree in any of the cut majors) with a Computer Science degree, but wants to stay an extra year, should I transfer to another university, graduate on time, or switch majors?

    Don't worry, programming jobs in the US are being reduced faster than the staff at your CS department.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:Won't matter by bonafidehan · · Score: 1

      What kind of programming jobs are you talking about? Demand for CS majors at top technology companies far outstrips the supply. I'm a senior CS at CMU, and we're being bought up like there is no tomorrow at pretty high starting salaries (ranging from 70k to 90k). With starting salaries that high and with such a technology-pervasive world, there's quite a future for CS majors.

  39. Why did this make the front page? by kburkhardt · · Score: 1

    Hey editors, mod me down if you like, but this question doesn't seem to have broad appeal to the slashdot community.

    I hope the student in question doesn't get screwed, but does he really need our advice?

    1. Re:Why did this make the front page? by pdschmid · · Score: 1

      Maybe it wasn't for the advice but for the news conveyed by this post. I was quite shocked when I saw that Tulane is cutting their Engineering School. Patrick

  40. Your Options... by Arckanghel · · Score: 1

    This depends heavily on your financial situaiton as well. If you have the money and don't intend to do graduate work, I would transfer. You will lose a lot of credits and maybe take another year to graduate, but you seem like you want to take some other classes anyway. The program may or may not continue to be supported. They may or may not spend the money needed to keep the program up as it dwindles ot non-existence as well. Finishing your degree with 3-year old technoology, books, and educaiton in 2007 would not be the optimal choice. If you don't have the money or intend to do graduate work, stay there and graduate on time. You'll save some dough economically, and you can put it towards graduate school. Employers that are looking for graduate work will be more interested in your final school of graduation. When looking for a graduate program, often not finishing at the same school is a normal and well-accepted choice. I don't think being willing to accept changing majors means you are necessarily not interested in CS, but I would take a few classes in other majors while you are there. Use some of your elective credits to explore your other areas of interested in the next few semesters while your time invested in CS is very little. This will afford you the opportunity to continue what you are doing or to change if you find another area is where you belong.

  41. euphemisms by dorpus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So what they're saying is that they suck, so they are shutting down a large number of departments, and re-branding themselves as a bargain college for undergrads, so they can get drunk and run around naked at Mardi Gras.

  42. As a student advisor myself by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I would say, don't listen to the parent poster. Get your advice from slashdot instead; that means less work for us. Which means, more time to post to slashdot. Where I can give advice to the likes of you....

  43. ...only when fully open admissions are around. by cwcpetech · · Score: 1

    When that happens, maybe it'd be worth the waste of time - and a high quality education as well, guaranteed with no quotas. Otherwise, MIT is just as bad as applying to an Ivy - all prestige, no real value(given the low standards allowed at an Ivy, you might as well make them open to the red-blooded population as well) if you strip the part of it being from MIT.

    1. Re:...only when fully open admissions are around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err... MIT is knowns for providing a good education and not inflating grades. The only waste of time is the fact that 99.9% of the people in the country would get outright rejected from MIT if they applied.

    2. Re:...only when fully open admissions are around. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Otherwise, MIT is just as bad as applying to an Ivy - all prestige, no real value(given the low standards allowed at an Ivy, you might as well make them open to the red-blooded population as well)..."
       
      ...said the acne-faced loser who didn't get into MIT, Harvard, or Columbia.

  44. SWAP NOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are in CS, SWAP NOW! I have a CS degree, been out less than 5 years. Everything is outsourced! If you happen to be living in India or China, your prospects are bright. Living in North America? Consider moving to India. Hoping to find work here? McDonalds is hiring. Hoping to find work in CS here? McDonalds is hiring. Instead of saying 'Red-Black trees', 'polynomial complete' and 'recursive algorithm', practice saying 'want fries with that?', 'refill sir?' and 'don't worry, I'll get a mop and clean what she spit up right away!'. Seriously, if you are in CS and don't want to wind up living in a shelter, switch majors right now!

    1. Re:SWAP NOW! by jrf83317 · · Score: 0

      I must say that I do not agree with this. I graduated in 2002 with a CS degree. And have had 3 jobs since, each job better then the next. Started off programming at a credit union, then left for a gov job, and now I am back in the semi-private sector making a pretty good living. And YES I left those 2 jobs for better ones, I was not laid off for outsourcing or fired.
      I have found that finacial institutions, government agencies, and companies that work for the government are the companies that hire U.S. employees and keep U.S. employees.

  45. From the submitter... by baldbobbo · · Score: 1

    No, I'm a junior. I'm in Air Force ROTC, so I can advance to a 5-year instead of 4-year degree. I'm a native of Jefferson as well (Old Jefferson, not Metairie). I love Tulane and especially New Orleans since it's the only place I've known as home. I don't want to leave it, but it's the smart decision to make. I should have mentioned that I'm trying to get a history degree as well, thus the decision to stay an extra year.

    --
    -Bob
    1. Re:From the submitter... by NOLAChief · · Score: 1
      Here's the kicker, I'm no native... I'm from Missouri. i came down here to go to school, saw, and stayed. It just felt like the natural place to be.

      As a junior, it'll probably be a lot harder for you to transfer, though it can be done. It sounds like, though, you should be able to structure your curriculum so that you get your CS requirements out of the way before they close the engineering school and then spend your last year working on your history degree. Friend of mine at school did that with a CS/Poli sci double major and it worked fairly well. talk to your professors though. assuming cowen's not bluffing for some stupid reason, the best thing to do may be to get a feel for whether or not they'll be leaving and if they think it's worth staying. If you're particularly close to one or two professors that are leaving, you may be able to talk them into letting you follow them, especially if you've been doing research work under them. Sometimes profs being hired by a new school can insist they let student x in with them to continue their research. Might be worth looking into.

  46. Irony: Tulane Eliminating Civil Engineering by Nova+Express · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I understand the need of a university to cut programs to balance their budget, but am I the only one that sees rather bitter irony in eliminating the Civil Engineering department in the wake of the Katrina levee collapse? Don't you think you'd maybe want to expand it, and maybe focus on levee construction, hyrodlogy, and related topics so that such a disaster doesn't happen again? I know there are other schools who cover it, but don't you think there will be a fair number of young, native New Orleaneans (?) who lived through the flood, and want to major in civil engineering to ensure something like that never happens again?


    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Irony: Tulane Eliminating Civil Engineering by dorpus · · Score: 1

      If they are that smart, they'd go to engineering schools elsewhere. Would you trust the New Orlinese to build their own levees?

    2. Re:Irony: Tulane Eliminating Civil Engineering by puto · · Score: 1

      As a 35 year old native new orleanian, most of us did not go to Tulane. Cost would be a major factor. When I was in school it was 15k a semester. So if your parents made decent money the pell grants did not cover it and the loans were not worth it.

      I grew up 8 blocks from Tulane. Most of the people I knew who went there were from elsewhere. I would say 85% to 90% percent of Tulanes undergrads were from out of state.

      The Masters programs had more locals. Due to continuing education.

      I did my time in a tiny LA university where a pell paid for everything and then some. I was able to shine, and was hired out of school.

      I did take summer classes at LSU and Tulane. Enjoyed the ones at LSU more.

      Now at my ripe old age I have decided to finish the degree at the University of Florida, which from what I have seen(girlfriend getting her doctorate there) is a fine school, and for me as a Florida resident, very cheap.

      Tulane is good for business and law. Tech, well, UNO has always beat it hands down.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    3. Re:Irony: Tulane Eliminating Civil Engineering by syntax · · Score: 1

      Although I'm without hard numbers, very few Tulane grads stay in the city. Most are a quick in, hello, and good bye. My advisor at Tulane seemed, well, shocked to hear that I was staying in the city. He indicated that it was very uncommon, only a handful stayed.

    4. Re:Irony: Tulane Eliminating Civil Engineering by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't you think you'd maybe want to expand it, and maybe focus on levee construction, hyrodlogy, and related topics so that such a disaster doesn't happen again?

      Why bother? This stuff is only going to get done if the government pays for it, and if they actually do (I'd be surprised), they won't be paying much for it. Why bother going into these majors if no one wants to pay anything for it?

      New Orleans doesn't need any engineers from Tulane. It can just contract some from China or India at a fraction of the cost. Even if they do a shitty job, it can't be any worse than the job that was done there before.

  47. The Answer Guy says: by TheAnswerGuy · · Score: 1

    Graduate on time.

  48. Many are dumping, going back to Liberal Arts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... to turn out "thinkers", philosphers, artists... broader education for an unspecific, service-oriented job futures.

    Apparently some see that there will be markets for them, since the hard sciences are doing better elsewhere...

    One of the Ph.D.s that wrote a well-read recommended book on software engineering is teaching intro philosophy classes; partly because it is his ball of wax, but partly he has to since the drastic drop in SE classes.

  49. You're shitting me... by Xshare · · Score: 1

    I just finished my Tulane Application... all of 5 ours ago. Requested Major: Computer Science. :-x

    Not that it matters anyways, I'm probably going to Georgia Tech. But damn, what of the timing!

    1. Re:You're shitting me... by GreySteele06 · · Score: 0

      I am a Tulane Biomedical Engineering Senior curently attending Georgia Tech. If i were you i would run like hell from Georgia tech. Strait from PrincetonReview.com: What Georgia Tech Students Say About... Student Body Because of the heavy workload at Georgia Tech, most students are "overly stressed, worried about tomorrow's test, and driven by the desire for the degree. This student has only minimal time for social functions." Which is just as well, since "many lack basic social skills." They're the type of folks who "make fun of TV shows or movies that violate basic rules of physics. It's sort of dweeby, but in a good way." Observes one engineer, "There is a sizable population of people who are so weird that you can tell their major by the way they walk ( e.g., CS [computer science] majors walk like they are uncoordinated)." Tech is home to "large populations of foreign students, especially from India and China." More like social function and coordination....soo many people trip going UP stairs. What Tulane Students Say... "Tulane offers some of the best academics in the country." The school is true to the spirit of its hometown of New Orleans; therefore: exposing students to "a more relaxed atmosphere with some of the most talented and fascinating people you will ever meet." The famous nightlife of New Orleans makes it difficult for some students to remain focused solely on academics; however, students who "have the amazing ability to party hard and study harder know what it takes to succeed, and they do it while having fun." Undergraduates agree that "the school's academics are fantastic. The professors are great, and the educational resources outstanding." They also appreciate that "classes are usually pretty small, even the introductory ones" and that "very few, if any, profs care more about research than they do about us." The workload in most areas is "tough but not overwhelming," with assistance readily available to students who fall behind. One student adds, "I was having trouble at the beginning of the semester. All of my professors sat with me one-on-one and worked with me until I understood the material." Administrators, from the top down, earn similar praise. Students report that the university's president "has done an amazing job of balancing much needed university construction and improvements, while staying [with]in budget, still offering amazing scholarships, and keeping student morale at a high level. As if this wasn't enough, he even teaches leadership classes." After Going to Georgia Tech i know why people drop out of school. I know what you all are thinking....its because Tech is so hard.....WRONG. I actually find my classes here easier. This place just sucks. Maybe staying in and studying because you pretend your classes are very hard when they are not is your thing......its not mine. We have fun and study.

    2. Re:You're shitting me... by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      At least it was after you finished your applications and not after you had accepted an offer from them. It also means that you can save yourself the application fees unless you've already mailed it out.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
  50. Ask at the school probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask at the school. Just by way of convention, if you have demonstrated in someway that you have at least 95% of the second bachelors done, they will typically honor the cut progam as if they never cut it for you-and who ever else is impacted. Also ask your student body folks-in a pinch you may also beable to get a minor. In someways this looks as good or better.

  51. First jobs and school reputation by erice · · Score: 1

    First of all, once you've had your first job, no one really gives a crap where you went to school. They care about what quality of work you did at your last job. They care that you *did* go to school. That's about it.

    Which makes it all the more critical that your first job be a good one. It sets the tone for the rest of your career. If your first job doesn't impress than you will have work against the tide to get a second job that will impress.

    And how do you get a good first job? Well, a good start is to graduate from a good school that is known to be a good school by the people who have the power to give your a good first job. Your chances are not helped if the first thing that comes to the hiring manager's mind when he see's your school's name is "Wasn't that program shut down?".

    In good times, a graduating from a known good school may mean a better first job. In hard times, not graduating from a known good school may mean no first job.

    As much as we geeks may not want to believe it, perception matters.

  52. you're overpaying* for school by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    Especially for engineering. I used to live no more than ten blocks from campus, and I now live 5 minutes from there, so I and my friends from school have spoken to each other about Tulane w.r.t education for the price---and we would know about expensive education, because we went to an expensive private high school. But that's just my unbased (but very biased) opinion---I actually don't know much about the Engineering department, except that Tulane isn't known much for it.

    I will mention that several engineering students from Tulane spent this semester up here at Georgia Tech; I don't know who any of them are, but perhaps you can find out if you are so inclined.

    * I noticed that you are ROTC (unless that isn't a picture of you on your site), so perhaps they are picking up the tab. Also, if you are studying engineering related to water, Tulane may yet be an appropriate place, as schools in our area tend to have a vested interest in water flow and control structures, as has been all to clearly demonstrated to everyone. But don't quote me on that. Go talk to your advisors.

    1. Re:you're overpaying* for school by baldbobbo · · Score: 1

      ROTC doesn't pick up the whole tab. With financial aid and Tulane accommidating me with room & board because I'm ROTC, I have a little over $1000 (which is too much for my parents). ROTC covers 15000 a year for me, along with books and a stipend.

      --
      -Bob
  53. Switch to law - get a career by DukeLinux · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have one of those engineering degrees. It's pretty much worthless. Bail on engineering and get a law degree. You can get rich repossessing wheelchairs from the elderly or randomly suing doctors. Hey it's the only growing field left in America. You might as well jump on the gravy train while it is still roaring forward.

  54. hello by orbit86 · · Score: 0

    I'm Switching to a Marketing degree from a CS Degree. I'll be happier.. I'll program what I want rather sleeping in class and I'll become a corrupt business bastard just like I always wanted

  55. CS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they're dropping all Engineering courses. And you're Computer Science. Sounds like you've got nothing to worry about.

  56. You never know who you might be talking to. by twitter · · Score: 0
    How the hell would a bunch of random people on Slashdot know what you should do in some strange particular circumstances that we couldn't possibly know the details of since we aren't on the staff for your school?

    Slashdot readers just happen to include at least one New Orleans native and Tulane graduate, myself. I'd love to know more, so why don't you shut up?

    One thing I can contribute is that Tunlane is dead wrong about their admissions. They say,

    "We realize that at post-Katrina Tulane, the size of our incoming first-year classes may be smaller. Rather than lower our admission standards in order to admit more students, we will maintain our academic standards by becoming smaller yet stronger."

    But they have actually had MORE applications this year than last. The news acted as advertising and actually increased interest in the school!

    What they might be having problems with are servicing the huge debt that Dr. Kelly left them with when he built up their business school and people deciding not to return. They might also have trouble housing people who want to stay, though you can see that most places students lived were not flooded, so the live on campus is also misguided.

    What ever the problems are, the school is determined to make them worse and I would not want to study anything technical at Tulane now. It was mostly a party school and few people attended for engineering to begin with. I imagine it would be a great place to teach and you can do what you want with what you have. Well, it used to be that way. Now that they are firing everyone, it will surely suck and it will be hard for a student to get a well rounded technical education.

    Reading further, it looks like they are a bunch of jerks you don't want to be around. Try this on for size, which looks like more of the same:

    a Board of Tulane task force has been charged with redefining how the Newcomb College and Tulane College names and endowments will be used to support the new structure while also acknowledging those colleges' important historic ties to Tulane University.

    So, having spent all of their money, they are going after other people's money. They have been trying this for decades and I hope it does not work now. Newcomb has some excellent programs and is far more open minded than Tulane, some programs of which are more like mindless indoctrination camps than education.

    What do they want to keep? What do they want to actually pay for in their search for excellence while they trash the school of medicine and the engineering school? Their business school will continue to churn out clueless asses who will follow all the greedy trends, like outsourcing engineering to India. From their own page, we find some real junk surviving majors:

    • African and African Diaspora Stud.
    • Anthropology - not so junky really.
    • Communication
    • Consumer Behavior - Marketing
    • Legal Studies in Business
    • Marketing (see Consumer Behavior)
    • Mathematical Economics
    • Political Economy
    • Social Policy and Practice
    • Women's Studies

    The Women's studies group actually shared space with the Civil Engineers. The kinds of crap they left on the board beggars description. They thought the new building was built for them at the time and it turns out they were right!

    With priorities like that and all the chances to shovel shit "rebuilding" the city being promissed as mandatory exercises, I think it's time to move on or stay gone.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:You never know who you might be talking to. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      why don't you shut up?

      Nice, very nice. And you complain when someone posts something you don't like, calling it 'offensive' and 'troll' etc.

      like outsourcing engineering to India

      Ah, yes. The voice of reason and imparciality, redux.

      Thanks for sharing. Everything is great right up until you start the ad-hominems and racist oblique references.

  57. Thanks everybody by baldbobbo · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really appreciate the feedback...very nice to hear from active engineerings (thus the reason for posting in the first place). I've tried contacting my advisor, but he's a little busy finding a job, so please cut down on knocking on the mod's. They understand at least. Second, you have to understand that New Orleans has been my home my whole life. The most time I've spent away from it was the time here at Mizzou (and I was forced here because of my parents, not because of its "outstanding" CS program) and Field Training for Air Force ROTC (which just happened to end about 4 days prior to Katrina's wrath upon my house that I stayed in during the storm). The last time I've spent a full week in the city was before July 24th. I was put through the equivalent of officer's boot camp then a hurricane, then spending thanksgiving and over 3 months away from my main computer (I've been using my OLD laptop with Debian since), most of my clothes (been wearing donated rags), my family, and all of my friends (I didn't know anyone in Missouri). Again, thanks for the feedback. It will really help in making a decision about my future. I really want to stay home, but if it means having to make up so much work (especially since I've accumulated a lot of hours in CS, and very little humanities or anything else), I'll have to do a few 20hr semesters just to catch up to a sophomore, much less a junior. (For those who asked, my minor is history...I was going to try to make it a second major, thus the extra year). For the third time, thanks.

    --
    -Bob
    1. Re:Thanks everybody by puto · · Score: 1

      Yo Bro.

      I am a fellow New Orleanian who has lived away from the city for 5 years. A hard place to leave. No place like it. I graduated from De La Salle many moons ago, before it had girls.

      Besides the girl gone wild vids, and the drunken rampages in the quarter, New Orleans has so much to offer in culture, food, music, etc, only locals tend to know our city is not based in the quarter.

      My parents retired to Florida, and I spent time here and mucking about South America. We all miss the city. And as a matter of fact, we are going back this Mardi Gras. First time in years, because it will be like a rebirth, and not a drunken orgy, but a return to the sitting on the blanket in the nuetral ground, family affair it used to be.

      Look, honestly, if you are into CS that is one thing, but a business degree cannot hurt, besides you do what you love. I made the choice recently to finish up in Business, many moons after I started school, because I have the CS skills.

      Ain't no shame in UNO.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  58. Too many idiots. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Finally one university that clues in to the problem of oversupply of engineers?

    Yep. The school of business, the cost of which are bankrupting the whole school, will continue to grow. The graduates will continue to have Forbes fueled dreams of sucksess. You know, clueless and greedy morons who chase IP nonsense. They think of themselves as corporate raiders ready to continue a fine tradition of dismantling US industry, offshoring and putting money in their pockets. Most will end up serving coffee, clerking in banks an stuff like that. Some will actually learn the folly of their ways, but most will keep chasing the corporate wet dream and so enable others to do foul things to people who care.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Too many idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sucksess... clueless and greedy morons... IP nonsense... dismantling US industry, offshoring and putting money in their pockets... serving coffee, clerking in banks an stuff like that... corporate wet dream... foul things to people who care...

      Wow, you seem very angry. A Tulane student beat the crap outta you in a bar or something? Wow.

  59. Bail hard by xtal · · Score: 1

    If the university is even making the announcement, they do not take those programs seriously as a core component of their charter. This will impact how your degree is initially recieved, and may impact the quality or opportunities offered to you while you are there.

    Transfer to another school soon (is January too soon?). This will minimize the complications of getting a degree granted from another institution - most have minimum credit requirements.

    Makes me wonder if this is a sign of times to come, though. Engineering enrollment is way down across the board; if you're looking at a low income and questionable employment oppportunities out the door, why would you do that to yourself when the alternatives are potentially easier.

    --
    ..don't panic
  60. university advisors... by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    work for the university. my father was an undeclared advisor for a while at the university in which he was a full prof. he had people come to him with an ACT of 3. yep, this fine institution let people in with the lowest ACT you get get...
        it was against university policy to tell people to drop out (and try to get their money back). there was remedial this and remedial that. as long as you had money.

        i know why you ask people at random. it's worth talking to persons that have no vested interest in one answer over the other. i have found it amazing that people will not pay attention to that one concept and then follow the advice of a person (or persons) that really doesn't have your best interest at heart.

  61. EE looks better than CS by xtal · · Score: 2, Informative

    Disclaimer: I have a BSc. EE

    In my experience, the engineering degree puts you above people with CS in the interview process early in your career. The core bits are crossed over, such as algorithms and discrete math. It is likely an engineering grad, especially an EE, will have taken more advanced mathematics courses than a CS grad - or at least, the default path through is much more math intensive.

    Maybe I am wrong, but that is my experience. Exceptional people always stand out no matter what their majors, but you need to get to the point where you have that opportunity.

    Another key point: It is very easy for a EE with a strong C++ or SQL background to apply for a develoepr job on high level systems. (Communications programming, DBA). It is very difficult for a CS person to apply for hardware engineering, firmware engineering, or control system positions.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:EE looks better than CS by Erwos · · Score: 1

      My experience has been different. The engineers I've worked with couldn't do software engineering - they came up with an original solution, and then layered ugly hack upon ugly hack upon it as it needed to grow. End result, the stuff eventually became more or less unmaintainable, and G-d help the next person to come upon the code who wasn't familiar with it.

      I'm not referring to BSc engineers, either - these are guys with Ph.Ds who spent most of their academic careers writing software. Lots of experience doesn't necessarily make you a great software engineer or programmer - there's actually some theory involved, believe it or not. I cringe every time I hear an engineer tell me they "know C++" or "know Java", because 95% of the time, they know enough to get a barely working solution going, and nothing more. That's hardly "knowing" a language, or knowing how to do proper software engineering.

      You need BOTH - the engineers to fill in the twiddly, engineering-specific bits of a program, and some CS people to make something maintainable and extensible out of it. Anyone who's hiring EEs as software engineers is almost always going to be in for a shock when the code that comes out is awful. I'm lucky that I work with at least one who can put out good stuff - but he's the exception, not the rule, from what I've seen.

      This is not to disparage your own skills, which I'm sure are impressive. Just realize that CS majors don't sit around and learn nothing for four years. (They shouldn't, anyways.) There's a lot of useful CS knowledge that doesn't get covered in electrical/mechanical/civil engineering.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    2. Re:EE looks better than CS by xtal · · Score: 1


      I'm not referring to BSc engineers, either - these are guys with Ph.Ds who spent most of their academic careers writing software.


      I think I found your problem..

      --
      ..don't panic
    3. Re:EE looks better than CS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to double-major EE and CS. I dropped CS (just took enough classes to minor) and went on to get an MSEE.

      No offense to the CS in the crowd, but my CS classes were mostly bad jokes. In my EE classes we started with fundamentals, and applied them to new problems. In my CS classes, it was basically "here's a project, go work on it" (exaggeration, but mostly correct). So you know what happened.. all the sweaty geeks who already knew everything did okay, and everybody else basically failed.

      In my EE classes, if you were smart and worked hard, you could actually *learn* the stuff. In my CS classes, the stuff wasn't really "taught", it was just sortof demonstrated and you were supposed to figure it out yourself.

      You can see it especially in databases: how many CS majors understand the relational model for instance? For an "engineer" like me, it's pretty clear: there's a model that underlies all data management, and it applies to every possible database product. That's what a "model" is. But to the other people I meet, relational == SQL. It's like they can't even comprehend of an abstract model independent of some implementation. I blame the CS education for this. And don't get me started on software *engineering*. That's a term that doesn't even make sense.

      So, uhm, yeah, go with EE.

    4. Re:EE looks better than CS by tom8658 · · Score: 1

      As an undergrad in both Computer Science and Computer Engineering (considering getting an EE degree too... my current workload is too easy :D), I wholeheartedly degree. Computer Science should be taught like engineering (and at UK, it's even in the Engineering department). The only reason my CS classes are so easy is because I've done so much work on my own: the classes are useless.

    5. Re:EE looks better than CS by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Engineers shouldn't be allowed to write code unless it's embedded. Otherwise they think that things like Matlab are a good way to develop multi-thousand line programs. Or maybe that's just the research engineers I run into.

    6. Re:EE looks better than CS by ChrisGilliard · · Score: 1

      Well, you have a point about versatility. EE is fairly versitile. I was a CE (Computer Engineering) major which I believe is even more versatile. But, if I was in school now I would probably major in CS, but that's more of a personal preferance. The advantage of CS over EE is that CS makes you a lot more qualified for designing virtual environments and other advanced programming jobs. Most EE majors don't even get into graphics programming, compilers, or software engineering theory classes. So, there's a big difference between saying you know C++ and knowing how to design a good piece of software.

      --
      No Sigs!
    7. Re:EE looks better than CS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem here is really the classes that get warped into stupid "programming" classes instead of science classes. You know the ones I'm talking about, the ones that only accept programs written in one language, where you learn how to create classes and how that language deals with inheritance and what not, rather than what object oriented programming is and is not. (hint, the fact that it is no longer acceptable (or in some langauges and situations, possible) to have a Painter paint a Wall COLOR_RED, but rather has to request the Wall to change it's color to COLOR_RED is partly due to people who have no clue what the hell they're doing designing the "object oriented paradigm")

    8. Re:EE looks better than CS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No offense to the CS in the crowd, but my CS classes were mostly bad jokes.


      Then you should have enrolled in a more rigorous CS program.

      In my EE classes we started with fundamentals, and applied them to new problems.


      Yes, I've had EE coursework and yes, this is "shake and bake" or "plug and chug" problem solving (and I use that term lightly).

      In my CS classes, it was basically "here's a project, go work on it" (exaggeration, but mostly correct). So you know what happened.. all the sweaty geeks who already knew everything did okay, and everybody else basically failed.


      I've seen this in lesser CS programs where prof makes absolutely no approach as to how to devise a solution. This does not mean that quality CS programs suffer from the same problem. Our profs in the entry level class spent as much time talking about the problem solving approach as they did the actual algorithm.


      In my EE classes, if you were smart and worked hard, you could actually *learn* the stuff. In my CS classes, the stuff wasn't really "taught", it was just sortof demonstrated and you were supposed to figure it out yourself.


      Welcome to the way education was in the old days. If you're highly motivated and want it, you'll get it. No spoon feeding.

      So, uhm, yeah, go with EE.


      Try software engineering.
    9. Re:EE looks better than CS by i_c_andrade · · Score: 1

      I have a BSc in CS and the only math difference from my college between EE and CS was at most two classes (same number of classes, just at most 4 different ones between programs). Since both programs are in the engineering college, I was one class shy of a math minor. But thats just my take.

  62. Less engineers by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    TFA doesn't mention engineering specifically,

    This page has more details.

    "A total of five programs - Civil and Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Computer Engineering and Exercise and Sports Science - will be eliminated."

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  63. Begone, Now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The degree is supposed to just validate WHATS ALREADY THERE. If you stay an extra year, it says, I DIDN'T ARRIVE WITH ENOUGH ALREADY THERE. If there are more things you want to learn, do it in an MS program, hopefully paid by the employer, maybe a part-time MS program. Honestly, at a school like Tulane, you are not getting a great deal on your educational dollar. Don't make the deal worse by staying an extra year.

    Tax freedom day is 31 May 2005.

    Tuition freedom day, at least for me (I went to MIT), was when I was 37 years old.

    In other words, it took more than a decade after my undergrad education before I broke even on the huge pile of cash I invested in MIT. My engineering education, so far, has not been a financially sound expenditure. List to this : I have never been unemployed, and have always earned an above-average salary for my age and educational attainment. BUT, the amount I have earned 20 years after my undergrad education just barely exceeds the amount I would have right now if I had placed my undergrad tuition in the US stock market.

    These days an engineering education is - at best - an admission ticket to a stock-market casino, with the odds heavily stacked against most of the players. At worst, it's a decade of indentured servitude. By staying an extra year, you will undoubtedly hurt yourself financially, down the road.

  64. You're kidding! by oboreruhito · · Score: 1

    A university in the city where a catastrophic failure in civil engineering resulted in the deaths of more than a thousand people and destruction of billions of dollars of property - that university is cancelling its civil engineering program?

    You're kidding! You can't be serious!

    1. Re:You're kidding! by narcc · · Score: 1
      A university in the city where a catastrophic failure in civil engineering resulted in the deaths of more than a thousand people and destruction of billions of dollars of property - that university is cancelling its civil engineering program?


      Makes sence to me -- Apparently their civil engineering program isn't that effective...
  65. Football by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are keeping NCAA Division 1 football, it seems. Obviously keeping their priorities in order.

  66. God help us by stox · · Score: 1

    that we should pull funds from the endowment at anything other than the legally mandated minimum rate.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  67. un-universal university degree plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good sign that universities may look mainly to degree plans that attract enough students to be viable. The university does not have an obligation to provide all degree plans. Smaller schools do this all the time. State funded schools may be waking to the fact that a department with 30 undergraduates and 4 graduate students is not worth having.

    It is the university's fault because they have been expanding the number of degree plans since the 1940s as well as the number of special chairs, research fellows, etc while neglecting their paying undergraduate students (e.g., by using non-professors, grad students, commercial professionals to teach the 1st, 2nd and sometimes 3rd year courses).

    This is directly linked to money income from each department's student tuition and research grants. Any pretense about 'offering a diverse selection of degree plans' is just fiction.

    1. Re:un-universal university degree plans by el+americano · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can imagine that the stress that precipitated it was extraordinary.

      Are you referring to hurricane Katrina?! If you think this is based on market forces and faulty prognostication you're nuts. They are fighting for survival. This link says that 86% of students will be back when the school reopens next January, which is more than they could have hoped for. Naturally they've suffered damage to facilities, lost students and faculty, and can expect lower enrollment for years to come.

      Do you really think they used "activity based planning" instead of damage control mode to decide they had to close five undergraduate programs?

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
  68. It's reassuring though... by 1zenerdiode · · Score: 1

    ...at least they're not going to drop out of NCAA D1 athletics. It's always nice to know that even in the face of staff and program cuts, they can still find money for college football. Guess they've identified the core interests of their consistuency.

    1. Re:It's reassuring though... by Nyeh · · Score: 1

      honestly i think we could have dropped our football without anyone knowing. i mean we lost to rice for pete's sake.

    2. Re:It's reassuring though... by Da_Fridge · · Score: 1

      The one thing you are missing is that the Football team beacuse of Conference Payouts funded most of the other sports programs. Football is a moneymaker, not a cost to the university

      --
      If I wanted water, I'd ask for DiHydrogen Oxide!
  69. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when has CS been part of the engineering school?

    Why the fuck wouldn't you stay?

    I'd say more, but fuck, if you can't figure it out, godspeed.

  70. Think about LSU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bob, have you given thought to seeing how much of your accumulated hours would xfer to LSU and finish up your BSCS degree there? It's not too far from your home either. A Computer Science degree from LSU is pretty well respected too. Although it's been over 15 years since I visited the campus there, the female-to-male student ratio was awesome and the babes were extraordinarily friendly to me despite being a short, ugly geek from Texas with no money. Too bad the out of state tuition fees at LSU were out of my budget and I had to stay back home living with my parents and finsh my BSCS degree in the UT system where tuition was affordable for me.

  71. Heh, how ironic... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    I'm a student at Georgia Tech, and after the hurricane a bunch of Tulane students got temporarily relocated here. I guess they'll be staying longer than they thought...

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  72. Tucci by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go next door to Loyola. Dr. Tucci (best damn CS Prof in the world) should still be there.

  73. Hope Filo gets a refund by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    David Filo, Tulane grad, established the Yahoo! founders endowed chair in Computer Engineering.

    The only honorable thing to do would be to give him a refund

  74. Using the Natural Environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will begin offering classes in underwater basketweaving thanks to a natural laboratory.

  75. Leave, think of your degree value in 5-10 years... by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1
    Seriously, it is hard to make a decision such as the one you have asked, but you need to start looking at other universities and soon. They have already laid off all the professors. Yes, the degree will "technically exist" until the cutoff, but they have already gotten rid of the professors. What this means is that you will have all brand new temporary professors. Very few will have good technical/research experience and even fewer will have more then 1 year of experience teaching, even less will even have a master's degree let alone a doctorate. Why is that? Becuase very few people will want to take a possition at an institution knowing that it will only be for a year or two, and knowing full well that there will be almost no new funding since there is no point in funding a "dead" program, everything the department recieves will be any "left-overs" that might happen to exist from something.

    In a way, this is good life experience for you, since this can happen out in the working world (and does more often then you think). You need to learn to jump ship when the first signs of major trouble occur. Well, knowing that the department will be gone most definitely is a "sign" of "major trouble". Your degree is something that is seen as a certificate of your worth and accomplishments. Many places will look at the reputation of your university and equate that with a level of knowledge/skill you possess. In 5-10 years from now when someone see's your degree from a place that doesn't even offer any related majors, your percieved worth will be much lower then some other university that still has a very strong engineering college. True, most of this can be easily explained in the interview process, but getting to that interview in the first place will be that much more difficult, since most large corporations have a huge disconnect already in terms of hiring engineering staff, so any small "possible red flag" on your resume and you are simple in the "out pile".

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  76. red dawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just systemic of our culture as a whole.
    Science is not cool anymore; it doens't pay well and there are tens of thousands of other screaming people willing to take your job for 2% of the pay. Get an MBA instead and off leech that until the trend starts to reverse which may be never because the US is getting owned right now in intl' trade. You may not believe what I say. see if you can find out when the last hr / biz employee got fired. now last engineer?

  77. jump, as others have said, and look at rice by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

    As others above said, jumping to another school is probably a good move. Your faculty are going to be far too deep into CYA mode to pay attention to the needs of undergrads. That being said, since you're a) already in the South b) used to paying private-school rates c) going to a school with a good reputation and d) close-ish to Houston [subset of the first point], I'd seriously suggest taking a look at Rice. Rice has a very strong program in CS, and is a good school overall from what I've seen and heard. (I'm an alum from UT Austin, but I've known some very sharp people with Rice CS backgrounds.) Houston has a number of virtues for students as well, such as very inexpensive rents and a large job base for when you start looking for internships/first job/etc. As with all advice on the internets, take with a grain of salt, etc. and good luck!

  78. Change schools by Frozentech · · Score: 1

    I think you should transfer ASAP. It's not just your program being cut back, Tulane as a whole is being drastically cut for at least a year due to Katrina. What is it, 250 staff, including 50-60 tenured professors being let go ? Not a good year to attend that school ! Are you already doing the new mandatory community service ?

  79. Industrial Eng. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the last stop would be Industrial Engineering.
    Or at my alma, Packaging Science. If you can't hack it, pack it.

    I remember the entire fraternity sitting up stairs trying to help this one PackSci major figure out how to design a cardboard box. "Dude, I have a cardboard box in my room why don't you look at it?" "Look you have to have equations for this type of thing. They have to be in this book you bought, right?"
    None of us could beleive this guy was clueless has top how to design a cardboard box.

    1. Re:Industrial Eng. by ph4s3 · · Score: 1

      ROFL.

      Nothing like a nerd flame war comparing degree disciplines.

      I haven't even heard of "Packing Science." Industrial Eng and PackSci weren't offered at my university (Univ. of Tulsa), so I can't comment specifically on their academic rigor.

      I can see where IE could actually be construed as statistics more than engineering. But that being said, after having been in the workforce for 6+ years now I have come to understand why IE is important. It may "just" be the science of a process feed-back loop, but it sure is applicable in the field when things are done millions of times.

      On more than one occassion I've thought about it as a Master's discipline in order to gain a better understanding of quality control, analysis and continuous improvement. But then I think how much people will make fun of me and I go back to thinking about an MSEE or MBA.

      In regards to the PackSci frat guy, they did give him a book to figure out his problem. They were provided in HS for Geometry and Trig. LOL.

  80. Re:stick with Computer Science (then a law degree) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finish your CS at Tulane then GO TO LAW SCHOOL (but not at Tulane unless you're sure you want to stay in Louisana--their legal system is unlike the rest of the US).

  81. Drop out, steal some ideas, you know... like Bill! by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

    Go intern somewhere, take all that insider information, drop out of college, quit interning, find some VC's, and start your own company.

    Hey, it's the american way!

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  82. Wrong Choice by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    Your school cutting its CS degree program brings the choice of moving or finishing. Changing majors really would have to be brought in from another viewpoint. Are your CS teachers as irritating as mine? If you are really contemplating changing majors it's either because you don't like the subject, you like another subject better, or you don't like your teachers.

    If switching schools is truely an option by all means take it. If I had the option, I would have left my school by now.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. gotta by MegaMcSucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    well... you probably gotta go there at least for next semmester. My sister graduated from Tulane and my Brother goes (sort of) there now. He's transfered to Claremont McKenna College for the semmester but they won't let him stay another semmester since it's such a small school. No other colleges are taking any transfer requests from Tulane students until next year so his options are take a semmester off and figure out something to do later OR go back to New Orleans and LIVE ON A CRUISE SHIP for the semmester. That's not as fun as it sounds. His room would be about 5 X 5 and he'd have to take a shuttle to school everyday. How bogus is it that his choice is to live in on a cruise ship for a semmester in a town thats virtually deserted or live at home (WITH ME! (i'm only 15 - 16 in 5 days)) for half a year while all his friends are back at college. Most of the kids that went to Tulane and transferred to new schools are allowed to stay there for next semmester because they're big schools and they don't care any better. I know this doesnt have anything to do with anything, but if my brother lives at home for a semmester he'll do stuff like take our car everywhere (I was supposed to get it when he went back to college) and eat all my hot-pockets. I'M ANGRY - I WANT MY HOT POCKETS FOR ME! NOT FOR HIM.

  87. Katrina pain, no gain by harvey+the+nerd · · Score: 1
    I am sure that it is a painful situation. Tulane was considered "less well off" for its aspirations *before* the hurricane with perhaps $750m endowment. (e.g. Rice has 4x the money, 1/3 the kids) Suddenly minus $200m in bills and cash flow (5 years after our national internet investment debacle).

    Probably something HAD to go at Tulane, engineering must have seemed low man on the totem pole, big bucks pgm, less glory than others, less instant alumni $$ lately. Perhaps if the world has $160 oil, overpriced Asian labor, and a superChinese military & yuan, this may later seem short sighted but they do have to react now. And US mgmt today is a now kind of thing, not that "vision thing"...

    Tulane has tried to partly streamline between a stressed national private university and a respectable liberal arts college. Let's all wish them good luck, both students and the university.

  88. Leave, but don't come here! by CorporalKlinger · · Score: 1

    It seems like the thrashing of engineering programs isn't isolated to areas hit by the hurricanes. Here in Iowa, The University of Iowa has approved an additional "fee" for juniors and seniors in engineering of $500 per student. With an engineering program that's much smaller than Iowa State University's program, this is yet another factor that I think will negatively impact this U of Iowa's engineering student recruiting efforts. The full deal about the fee can be found here.

    The university's opinion is that engineering students require a greater amount of staff attention and information technology resources (something for which engineers already paid a $70 annual fee). I feel this is just another slap in the face to another engineering program. Already our nation is falling behind other countries in terms of the number of students graduated annually in the fields of engineering and the hard sciences. Now we're given yet another obstacle, this time financial, which I think will further discourage students from pursuing degrees in engineering. Engineering has some of the most difficult and rigorous coursework of any area of study, and now students at U of Iowa are expected to pay more for the pleasure of having to deal with weekly all-nighters, homework that never quits, and projects with impossible due dates. And as for why the increase is just for juniors and seniors? Simple, smaller class sizes in upper-level studies increases the relative amount spent on teaching each student in the smaller class. I say it's just for those years because once students have committed two years to a university, transferring becomes very difficult and the students have no choice but pay the fee and continue at their present institution.

    So like I said in the title, I would suggest getting out of that sinking ship down in Tulane, but be sure before you move that you are going to be attending a university that respects its engineering program at least as much as its liberal arts and sciences program. If you can't find a place that's better that you can easily transfer into, then you may actually want to stay. Better the devil you know, right?

  89. Read the writing on the wall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the following, remember that feeling when you vote next time: Stop trying to get an education! Intel, Microsoft, JPMorgan are just a few organizations who are investing billions of dollars in other countires (India) instead of here. That means less for education here which you are now feeling personally. they don't want to pay you what it costs to live and raise a family here. So they are walking out. Are you and the rest of your generation going to stand for it? Your choice. But you do have power. It is called the vote and many people died to ensure you have it. Use it. And use it wisely. Or become extinct. Your choice. The clock is ticking...

  90. Things aren't going to get better by CowbertPrime · · Score: 1

    They're going to get worse, before anything else, if people on the ground have any credibility at all.

  91. It won't make any difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Abandon the sinking ship that is your school; unless you like the idea of having a degree from an institution that no longer has a CS program. In the new tech world, your reputation can make or break your career."

    Oh please.

    A 4 year degree is primarily a tool to prove to your potential employers that you have enough brains and gumption to make it through 4 years of something. The idea that you're useful with your B.S. in any field is laughable.

    And yes, internships may be helpful, but hardly the make or break to your career. When you graduate from any 4 year institution, you'll take a crap job for 12-18 months, quit and then look for an actual good job. Its the ways its worked for a long time in the technical fields and probably always will.

    My advice...If you're 1-2 years away from your degree, you stick it out and finish, because 99.999 % of potential employers either won't care what college you graduated from or won't care that Tulane is shrinking some degree programs.

    Anybody who tells you different is being silly and probably has 5 years experience in the field.

    And yes, I have 25 years in the field and am now "the boss".

  92. Why stay when their degree is no good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why stay in a place whose degree will in the future won't be worth a levitating fornication in an oscillating pastry? Transfer into a worthwhile institution like Georgia Tech as soon as you can.
            Tulane, I understand, is in New Orleans. That place is probably going to be hit with at least 2 force six hurrycanes next year anyway and you don't want to have to get rescued from a tree by a helicopter or be one of Bush's sacrificial lambs again like all those bodies that nobody is gonna work on because the old FEMA director, before he was stopped from doing so, wanted to push 'em all into a landfill because they were poor and nobody would pay to redeem them.....probably 'cause they were all dead or all black. Get out of there while you still can. It won't be long before the other schools wise to the fact that Tulane's credits 'ain't what they used to be' and start not accepting them. You are going to lose a few anyway, like some local state legally required history courses and some other local courses that some long forgotten administrator thought 'just everybody should have'; but cut your losses and move on!

  93. Wouldn't be surprised to see this elsewhere. by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Tulane's a special case, of course, but I could definitely see some schools deciding to cut back on the science and engineering programs given what's happening. Unfortunately it's a vicious cycle.

    1. Students see all the technical jobs either becoming quite low-paying compared to business/management positions, or they see them moving completely overseas. (Example: When all the tech support reps are over in other countries, how is the entry-level IT guy going to get a career started?
    2. Student decides that management is a safer bet, no matter how much they might enjoy tech and engineering.
    3. Student enrolls in/switches major to business.
    4. Engineering and science enrollment drops.
    5. School can't justify spending more money to keep a program that no one wants to pursue.

    I don't know what it will take to get people interested in science and technology again. I'm thinking it would have to be some grand project like the Apollo program in the 60s...something everyone could get behind.

    Got any project ideas?? :-) I'd propose an alternative fuels project...just watch those engineering dollars flow in after that!! We could fix our entire middle east problem in one shot.

  94. But they aren't... by daemon_lothar · · Score: 1

    cutting the major Division I sports programs, see if only you had done something useful with your life like play football you wouldn't have these problems.

  95. Worth of Degree by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Switching gears, as an alumnus, what does this say about my degree? does this mean it's worthless? if so, i want a refund, mr. cowen. every single penny i've given to the university. every single bit of blood, sweat, and tears i gave to earn my degree and try to make the university and the community a better place for it. every year you complain that alumni donation rates are down. it adversely affects your precious us news and world report rankings. want to know why we alumni aren't giving the university a dime? because of shit like this. i'm tired of being alienated at every turn.
    First of all, unless you're either from one of the top engineering schools like MIT or CMU, or one of the degree mill programs, employers really don't care which university you graduated from. They're looking at the fact that you have a degree, maybe your GPA, and mainly checking your skillset against a checklist. Secondly, you graduated a year ago. You have industry experience now. Prospective employers are much more likely to look at your job history than your college history. First of all, it's the more recent experience. Secondly, it's more relevant for them. College proves you can get a degree. Work experience proves you can hold a job.

    I actually went through a scare similar to this in my college career. The University of Dayton's Computer Engineering program had not been fully accreditted by ABET in my sophomore year. Theoretically, if our program had not passed muster with the inspectors, I may have had to either scrap two years of study, or switch to a major like *shudder* Electrical Engineering or Computer Science. *sardonic grin* As it is, we passed the ABET examination and I just had to deal with department fine-tuning of the classes which led to many students have to spend an extra year chasing the changing plan of courses for the degree.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Worth of Degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I actually went through a scare similar to this in my college career. The University of Dayton's Computer Engineering program had not been fully accreditted by ABET in my sophomore year. Theoretically, if our program had not passed muster with the inspectors, I may have had to either scrap two years of study, or switch to a major like *shudder* Electrical Engineering or Computer Science. *sardonic grin* As it is, we passed the ABET examination and I just had to deal with department fine-tuning of the classes which led to many students have to spend an extra year chasing the changing plan of courses for the degree.


      So you like paying big money for a degree? Jeezus man you've got OSU, Miami of Ohio, Univ of Cinci and a host of other schools around (with the exception of Wright State.. wrong university) along with Purdue next door in IN and you went there?
  96. biomedical remains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf? What kind of half assed program will be left after computer science is cut nevermind the cuts to the medical school? At my old Uni biomedical was almost completely dependent on the CS department. Engineering programs aren't like the arts, that are mostly self-contained. World class engineering requires interdisciplinary cooperation.

  97. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advisors, especially in the engineering disciplines where scheduling is often highly inflexible, suck. They will generally rubber stamp whatever you suggest no matter how bad the idea is.

    Their advice is also non-binding on the university (who actually gives you the degree). I had a faculty advisor cost me $3000 after he looked into whether I had to take a class or not. He said no I had already met that requirement. The university said yes I still needed to take it. Guess who won? I didn't find out until my graduation paperwork came back saying I was incomplete. My scholarship was gone and I had to graduate a semester late. I was most unhappy.

  98. Engineers and Donations and Regionalisms by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Your problem seems to be the method by which the school is achieving this. It's simple: sports bring in money, and engineering doesn't. Look at the enrollment figures for engineering lately: they suck. Students aren't going into engineering any more, and for very good reason: it's a shitty profession. It has somewhat ok starting pay, but it ends quickly: there's no such thing as a raise, there's no such thing as long-term employment, and there's no such thing as greater experience making you more valuable. In a nutshell, our society has decided that it simply doesn't value engineering as a profession, or the work that engineers do, in order to pay them well, so in return less people are choosing this profession.
    I disagree on so many points of what you're saying that I'm not going to even try to take this point by point. I do agree that engineers don't bring in as much money as sports, but I don't think it's due to engineering being a dead-end job or a low-paying one. Firstly, sports bring in money while the students are still in school while engineering generally doesn't. This is important because I wager that a large number of people, once they leave school, don't give a second thought about it outside of proudly proclaiming their "alma mater," keeping in touch with a few friends, and maybe attending the odd reunion. Secondly, there's a different dynamic to things. Team sports tend to build a strong (rabid?) community. You have people returning for Homecoming games and you have former players who want to relive their glory days before they got old and fat. Engineers... quite frankly, most of them tend to have their small circle of friends who they keep in contact with for years after. More importantly, that circle of friends is largely not associated with the campus itself. The friendship matters more than that they happened to attend the same school. Thirdly, and this one is more out on a limb then the rest, I think a lot of engineering students feel that their tuition and other fees was due payment for their degree and don't feel the need to keep pumping money into the school after graduating. They're thinking more intellectually about their college experience than emotionally. But, like I said, that last bit is a bit out on a limb.

    As for engineering being a dead-end or low-paying job, I'm not sure where you're getting your statistics. All of the engineers I've kept up with after graduating are doing quite nicely for themselves. They got well-paying jobs after school, often with companies they interned with, and paid off all of their student loans within a year of graduating. I do know there are people who don't succeed, but I wonder how many of those people entered engineering not because they enjoyed it, but because they heard it was high-paying or that engineers are "always in demand." Too, I know some people who initially had trouble after graduating because they approached their engineering classes more from a theoretical standpoint than a practical one. *wry grin* As one of my Circuits professors said, "there's no such thing as an ideal resistor and wires do have resistance, inductance, and capacitance." The one friend I had in engineering who ran into that is now on his doctorate and will probably be a professor, God help him...

    As for "there's no such thing as greater experience making you more valuable," I don't know that I could disagree with you more. Greater experience is really the majority of what makes you hireable in the engineering job market. The problem most engineers (or at least those who haven't been co-oping or doing a part-time job on the side) have on graduating is a lack of experience. And once you become an expert on a system, you will always be able to find a job so long as that system continues to exist. Heck, my Granddad still earns a decent sum each year being an expert witness on a particular series of boilers. You also, of course, have to pick up new knowledge so that you can adapt when the system you're expert on retires, particularly if you're determined t

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  99. If you're stupid enough to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you MUST stay to complete your degree, even if you can't finish before the deadline. It'll all work out OK, because they'll fix it all better for you.

    Seriously. This university has expressed open hostility toward your chosen program of study. Get out as fast as you can. Anything else gets you what you deserve.

  100. Worth of Degree by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    So you like paying big money for a degree? Jeezus man you've got OSU, Miami of Ohio, Univ of Cinci and a host of other schools around (with the exception of Wright State.. wrong university) along with Purdue next door in IN and you went there?
    Actually, I'm from Kentucky. And my top choices were actually MIT and CMU. UD was my backup school which my parents had me apply to because they wanted me to apply to at least one Catholic school. *sheepish grin* And I got my applications in late for MIT and CMU. In the end, it worked out. UD is not a top tier school for engineering, particularly in the area of computing, but they do have strong ties with the Air Force, so getting hired upon leaving school was not difficult. And as for cost of schooling, I had all of my school loans paid off within a year of getting out, so I'd say that the job I received upon leaving was up to compensating for the cost of education.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  101. Meh by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Almost done with mine in a year and a half... and I'm working full time with a family. Grad school is a cakewalk if you like what your doing. No pesky general electives or bullshit prereqs just classes in the stuff you enjoy doing (and if you don't enjoy doing it you shouldn't be going for it...)

    -everphilski-

  102. Metaphor man says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half the time it was like pulling teeth even before the storm.

    ...checkmate!

    1. Re:Metaphor man says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you live outside the US, under a rock inside the US, or you're just an absolute numbskull, but there was an actual - not metaphorical storm - that physically damaged Tulane University. It was generally known as Hurricane "Katrina."

  103. hmm fire er hurricane sale? by i_c_andrade · · Score: 1

    I wonder what will happen of all that equipment that all the engineering and medical programs wont be using. Is it just me or did none of the Liberal and Fine Arts programs get the axe like Engineering and Medical? Anyway, there might be some sweet stuff for sale

  104. engineering by sundy58 · · Score: 1

    Come up to Kansas University in beautiful Lawrence Kansas. We would love to have you. We are going to need a couple of good CE post grads in a year or so. http://www.cresis.ku.edu/flashindex.htm As an aside I have been told you should get your under grad one place masters another and PHD yet another.

  105. SAVE TULANE ENGINEERING by aradler · · Score: 1

    We are here to prevent this from happeneing. The teachers, students, and allumni unit at www.SaveTulaneEngineering.org. Show you support by signing the pledge and read about what has been done and will be done. -Anthony Radler Senior Tulane ME/CS Major '06

  106. Re:Where are you now? Transfer and finish early. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They shut down and told every college not to accept us Tulane students. They now are kicking us out. Some school still won't accept us. Basically we have been knocked down, given hope by the University, and then kicked while we are still cripple. (and some people laugh at that) Get a full story at www.savetulaneengineering.org

  107. Engineering Program by Go+Roos · · Score: 1

    For any students who are being cast aside by Tulane University and The Engineering Department. Check out The University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Computing and Engineering. Civil, Mechanical, Electrical and Computing Engineering programs they offer. The School is ABET accreditated of course and could be a great option. Good Luck to the students that must deal with yet another issue because of Katrina.