Post cards do not have envelopes and so can be unintentionally viewed. An e-mail would require the sysadmin or employee to actually intentionally retrieve it from their system to read it.
Correction, a mailbox you're paying for that someone else owns. I don't "own" the physical box at my local post office, but they aren't allowed to read all my mail on a whim either.
Iraq Body count includes violent deaths (or "related deaths" by any means. For all they care those 15033 deaths could've been all natural causes and still blamed the US. Look at some of the listings. I believe I once saw the death of an elderly man due to a heart attack which they blamed on "hearing a gunshot" (whose gunshot? a neighbor's AK-47 or US marines or insurgents?) They also blatantly list killings of police officers by terrorists (police officers are civilians?) or foreigners by terrorists (foreigners are Iraqi civilians?). They also were throwing in scores of people who were wounded by simply gunshots (they don't know who, could've shot themselves in the foot or been robbed...US's fault though). Please.
The difference between repeating false information and lying is intent. If the UN really thought there were no WMD or other violations in Iraq, they wouldn't have continued sending inspectors to look for them. Oh wait, they DID find banned weapons which Iraq was destroying (or not since they apparently had SOME that were ready to fire at us when the invasion began).
They were more than likely hiding something; be it plans for a renewed weapons programs in chemical, biological or nuclear weapons or leftover samples for use in those revived programs. I don't think anyone truely believed that Iraq was clean. We found out later that they weren't.
Even John Kerry won't stand up and say Bush is a liar. He simply states that Bush "misled" America. Misled is a neutral term applicable to either a liar or someone that mistakenly leads another astray. Blair might very well be in the same situation. He said Iraq had weapons that could be fired within 45 minutes. Considering Iraq's attempts to actually make people think their units had the weapons and would use them against invaders (they were apparently issuing orders on the use of imaginary WMD), I don't see why we should think Blair lied. He probably just didn't know he was feeding the UK incorrect information.
We know now that Saddam likely didn't give a rat's ass whether sanctions were lifted in his lifetime since the Oil for Food program was a corrupt assortment of bribe takers that would let him do whatever he wanted with the money anyway.
No, that was actually mostly politicians screaming about Clinton getting BJs. A large number of "ordinary" folk just didn't give a shit and wondered why Bill Clinton getting BJs was worth millions of dollars for investigations and Senate trials.
You do realize that the Jewish people in Israel are not the only Jewish people on the planet, right? I know that the Palestinians aren't aware of this either, but why act as if every Jew on the planet has blood on their hands because of the Middle East?
It's generally the *intense* radiation released from the blast that causes the initial thermal damage so the answer to the thermal part is "quite easily". As far as sonic bursts without a medium (atmosphere) to travel through, there would be none or very little if the blast displaced some (at this point thin) atmosphere towards the satellite.
It would be the EMP that takes it out at a distance beyond the nukes destructive blast radius.
Did you download a fresh copy sometime yesterday? I noticed that there was a new PR release when I went to download a copy for another PC. I noticed "0.10.1" rather than "0.10" in the directory name and that tipped me off. They made no other mention of it except a little blurb on the front page and continued calling it just 1.0PR.
The PATRIOT Act actually rolled back various intelligence reforms that had been made after various abuses had been uncovered. Unfortunately, our Congress did not read the document, nor did they have the time to research the changes before voting on them. They couldn't possibly vote it down for risk of political suicide (career suicide for a politician) due to being "soft" on terrorism. The people who drafted the legislation knew this and tried it again with PATRIOT II when the Iraq ware started.
It's currentl a criminal offense punishable by fines and threat of lawsuit. The government wants to make it possible for them to come after people and throw them in jail themselves.
Truth be told, OJ didn't lose as much as the media let on. He still gets money from his football pension or whatever that nobody can touch. He also moved and they can't touch him where he's at now.
The point is still valid, however. OJ's case was a case of white America getting revenge for its inability to put him in prison. It's kind of ludicrous to think a criminal court found him *not guilty* and a civil court could actually find him *probably guilty* afterwards.
Normally, a civil case goes completely to hell once the accused is found not guilty by a criminal court. In OJ's case, the jury completely ignored the criminal case and just wanted to award money regardless of the source being guilty or innocent.
Just don't look or listen. Try ignoring it. What if I tried to say I had the right not to be forced to be exposed to minorities? Should I have them coralled into death camps so I won't have to ever see them again?
Freedom of Religion is not Freedom from Religion. You have the right not to practice a religion, but not the right to prevent others from practicing where and when they want. You can't just tell people to stop being a Jew, Muslim or Christian when they step out of their home or place of worship.
Prove to me that a minority group that is primarily impovrished and thus has a higher rate of crime than other groups is not disproportionately more harmful as a whole than other groups. If you can't, please begin construction of the death camps so we can solve the problem.
Slashdot Mirror
Facing down the Cyberdemon? The space marine comes up to his ankle ;p He BETTER shoot first.
They just don't want someone coming along and stealing the name so they fake working on movies to keep people from using their trademark, obviously.
Post cards do not have envelopes and so can be unintentionally viewed. An e-mail would require the sysadmin or employee to actually intentionally retrieve it from their system to read it.
Like letting the free market deal with white only restaurants and white only employers. The free market is the answer!
Correction, a mailbox you're paying for that someone else owns. I don't "own" the physical box at my local post office, but they aren't allowed to read all my mail on a whim either.
That's been the situation for decades =)
Iraq Body count includes violent deaths (or "related deaths" by any means. For all they care those 15033 deaths could've been all natural causes and still blamed the US. Look at some of the listings. I believe I once saw the death of an elderly man due to a heart attack which they blamed on "hearing a gunshot" (whose gunshot? a neighbor's AK-47 or US marines or insurgents?) They also blatantly list killings of police officers by terrorists (police officers are civilians?) or foreigners by terrorists (foreigners are Iraqi civilians?). They also were throwing in scores of people who were wounded by simply gunshots (they don't know who, could've shot themselves in the foot or been robbed...US's fault though). Please.
The difference between repeating false information and lying is intent. If the UN really thought there were no WMD or other violations in Iraq, they wouldn't have continued sending inspectors to look for them. Oh wait, they DID find banned weapons which Iraq was destroying (or not since they apparently had SOME that were ready to fire at us when the invasion began).
They were more than likely hiding something; be it plans for a renewed weapons programs in chemical, biological or nuclear weapons or leftover samples for use in those revived programs. I don't think anyone truely believed that Iraq was clean. We found out later that they weren't.
Even John Kerry won't stand up and say Bush is a liar. He simply states that Bush "misled" America. Misled is a neutral term applicable to either a liar or someone that mistakenly leads another astray. Blair might very well be in the same situation. He said Iraq had weapons that could be fired within 45 minutes. Considering Iraq's attempts to actually make people think their units had the weapons and would use them against invaders (they were apparently issuing orders on the use of imaginary WMD), I don't see why we should think Blair lied. He probably just didn't know he was feeding the UK incorrect information.
We know now that Saddam likely didn't give a rat's ass whether sanctions were lifted in his lifetime since the Oil for Food program was a corrupt assortment of bribe takers that would let him do whatever he wanted with the money anyway.
No, that was actually mostly politicians screaming about Clinton getting BJs. A large number of "ordinary" folk just didn't give a shit and wondered why Bill Clinton getting BJs was worth millions of dollars for investigations and Senate trials.
You do realize that the Jewish people in Israel are not the only Jewish people on the planet, right? I know that the Palestinians aren't aware of this either, but why act as if every Jew on the planet has blood on their hands because of the Middle East?
The treaty doesn't ban anti-satellite weapons so there's no need to withdraw.
Yeah, the damn Brits repulsed our attacks.
It's generally the *intense* radiation released from the blast that causes the initial thermal damage so the answer to the thermal part is "quite easily". As far as sonic bursts without a medium (atmosphere) to travel through, there would be none or very little if the blast displaced some (at this point thin) atmosphere towards the satellite.
It would be the EMP that takes it out at a distance beyond the nukes destructive blast radius.
The browser relies on a trusted sites white list for execution of the type of files in question.
Your virus scanner nuked your inbox because it contained an infected file.
Did you download a fresh copy sometime yesterday? I noticed that there was a new PR release when I went to download a copy for another PC. I noticed "0.10.1" rather than "0.10" in the directory name and that tipped me off. They made no other mention of it except a little blurb on the front page and continued calling it just 1.0PR.
uh oh, 4 GB of downloaded files gone...
The PATRIOT Act actually rolled back various intelligence reforms that had been made after various abuses had been uncovered. Unfortunately, our Congress did not read the document, nor did they have the time to research the changes before voting on them. They couldn't possibly vote it down for risk of political suicide (career suicide for a politician) due to being "soft" on terrorism. The people who drafted the legislation knew this and tried it again with PATRIOT II when the Iraq ware started.
If you are paying someone huge sums of money to fill their airtime with it rather than your opponent's, then yes.
How many of them do you think READ the PATRIOT Act rather than voting HELL YEAH to look strong on terrorism?
It's currentl a criminal offense punishable by fines and threat of lawsuit. The government wants to make it possible for them to come after people and throw them in jail themselves.
Truth be told, OJ didn't lose as much as the media let on. He still gets money from his football pension or whatever that nobody can touch. He also moved and they can't touch him where he's at now.
The point is still valid, however. OJ's case was a case of white America getting revenge for its inability to put him in prison. It's kind of ludicrous to think a criminal court found him *not guilty* and a civil court could actually find him *probably guilty* afterwards.
Normally, a civil case goes completely to hell once the accused is found not guilty by a criminal court. In OJ's case, the jury completely ignored the criminal case and just wanted to award money regardless of the source being guilty or innocent.
Keep your opinions to yourself, why should others have to listen to your gospels?
Just don't look or listen. Try ignoring it. What if I tried to say I had the right not to be forced to be exposed to minorities? Should I have them coralled into death camps so I won't have to ever see them again?
Freedom of Religion is not Freedom from Religion. You have the right not to practice a religion, but not the right to prevent others from practicing where and when they want. You can't just tell people to stop being a Jew, Muslim or Christian when they step out of their home or place of worship.
Prove to me that a minority group that is primarily impovrished and thus has a higher rate of crime than other groups is not disproportionately more harmful as a whole than other groups. If you can't, please begin construction of the death camps so we can solve the problem.
I think Stalin killing millions of people in order to control the rest through FEAR (terror) qualifies as terrorism.