There was, and I don't know why you're pretending there wasn't. Someone pretended a statement was equally a description of two parties. I suggested it wasn't. You disagreed with the most tangential argument I've ever heard. Then you pretended you didn't. Please don't do that, then act all morally superior about it. It's obnoxious.
Regardless of the level of cynicism you have invented for yourself to make yourself feel better about the wretched state of US politics, the above quote does not apply to both parties identically.
Adobe products are an interesting case of trying to solve systemic problems, and inevitably creating new, worse ones. Except photoshop. Photoshop is software that is just useful and nothing else.
Yeah, you've isolated what bigotry does wrong here: judging individuals from a group, while judging that group from different individuals.
And that's all well and good except gang-bangers don't run the local government, in a way that suggests a persistent cultural problem. There's something wrong with the state as a whole, even if you can say it's only because of a scant majority of those that happen to vote.
I guess all these self-taught programmers don't actually know basic logical principles.
I mean, I taught myself a lot of what I know(only one language out of dozens through formal education), but there's no substitute for a lot of the academic knowledge I've gained through schooling(how to build thread safe constructs, big O notation, core common data structures, application of design patterns, engineering process principles, heuristic algorithms like a*, and those are just big categorical things off the top of my head).
Or: how involuntary bulimia solved the nation's obesity epidemic. Valve's CEO awarded Nobel prize in medicine. Quoted as saying "bluuuuuuuuuuarg *pant* *pant* blaeearrargh"
I got a rift dev kit, and this sounds like a good leap forward on its design. Hopefully the consumer rift and this are both compatible with some sort of core software principals. The last thing the emergent VR economy needs is splintering.
I might just be cynical, but I never really saw that as fundamentally different that burning people, tossing their ashes into the ocean, and eating the fish that eat the algae that eat their body. It's all just matter at that point.
Eating people is only wrong on two factors. #1 obvious human pathogen risk #2 disrespect to those that cared about the deceased.
In the world of Soylent Green, no one cared about those that elected suicide, and they got processed by algae that ate their corpses, limiting the pathogen risk.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't know what world you live in where Japan has a healthy work culture. Abuse of psychology for net harm of workers is considered normal.
treat people like adults.
Well, sure, they will, but those that work for a living aren't really people, are they?
but since a point isn't really being debated here
There was, and I don't know why you're pretending there wasn't. Someone pretended a statement was equally a description of two parties. I suggested it wasn't. You disagreed with the most tangential argument I've ever heard. Then you pretended you didn't. Please don't do that, then act all morally superior about it. It's obnoxious.
for no regulation
Regardless of the level of cynicism you have invented for yourself to make yourself feel better about the wretched state of US politics, the above quote does not apply to both parties identically.
Can we put one between us and marketing. We don't have to hear their bad ideas to tell them they won't work for practical reasons.
I'm thinking about how flash "solved" the dynamic web page problem. Or how acrobat "solved" the persistent document problem.
Adobe products are an interesting case of trying to solve systemic problems, and inevitably creating new, worse ones. Except photoshop. Photoshop is software that is just useful and nothing else.
I'd find that a more tolerable comparison, yes.
Sunlamps, water recycling, underground nuclear power plants. The thousands of people that could sustain is all you need to "win".
They were clearly arguing it was a past fad, I'm not sure why you asked.
No, they didn't. You can disagree, but there's nothing intrinsically incorrect about the accusation they've leveled.
Yeah, you've isolated what bigotry does wrong here: judging individuals from a group, while judging that group from different individuals.
And that's all well and good except gang-bangers don't run the local government, in a way that suggests a persistent cultural problem. There's something wrong with the state as a whole, even if you can say it's only because of a scant majority of those that happen to vote.
So, my idea works! Yay!
I guess all these self-taught programmers don't actually know basic logical principles.
I mean, I taught myself a lot of what I know(only one language out of dozens through formal education), but there's no substitute for a lot of the academic knowledge I've gained through schooling(how to build thread safe constructs, big O notation, core common data structures, application of design patterns, engineering process principles, heuristic algorithms like a*, and those are just big categorical things off the top of my head).
A universal claim backed by absolutely zero evidence? Why, I never.
We'll never be satisfied. We're freaking technophiles who always want more neat technology crammed into everything. You're just in denial about it.
Or: how involuntary bulimia solved the nation's obesity epidemic. Valve's CEO awarded Nobel prize in medicine. Quoted as saying "bluuuuuuuuuuarg *pant* *pant* blaeearrargh"
Patch notes:
*To improve immersion, the headset turns into a headcrab and turns you into a zombie when your heath reaches zero
I got a rift dev kit, and this sounds like a good leap forward on its design. Hopefully the consumer rift and this are both compatible with some sort of core software principals. The last thing the emergent VR economy needs is splintering.
You forgot "Mortal nemesis of Cold Fjord"
NOT installing the Facebook app
You think that's a choice?
Because they're useful tools of modern society, you damn luddite.
If our previous 20,000 years of history is any indication, there is mostly no Internet or cars.
Such ideas are clearly silly, and limited only to nincompoops.
It varies from municipality to municipality. Some directly drain into local streams, others go into sewer systems, and some have separate systems.
I might just be cynical, but I never really saw that as fundamentally different that burning people, tossing their ashes into the ocean, and eating the fish that eat the algae that eat their body. It's all just matter at that point.
Eating people is only wrong on two factors.
#1 obvious human pathogen risk
#2 disrespect to those that cared about the deceased.
In the world of Soylent Green, no one cared about those that elected suicide, and they got processed by algae that ate their corpses, limiting the pathogen risk.