Slashdot Mirror


Tesla's Having Issues Charging In the Cold

cartechboy writes "It's winter, and apparently meteorologists have just discovered the term Polar Vortex, as that seems to be the only thing they can talk about these days. But seriously, it's cold, and apparently the darling child of the automotive industry, the new Tesla Model S electric car, is having issues charging in the cold weather. It's being reported that the charging cables that come with the car are unable to provide a charge when the temperature dips below zero. As you can imagine, this is an issue in a country like Norway where the Model S is one of the most popular cars. In fact, it seems this issue has already left one Model S owner stranded with a dead battery nearly 100 miles from the nearest charging station. Other owners are reporting issues charging. Tesla's European sales chief Peter Bardenfleth-Hansen apologized for he inconvenience owners are facing, and said it's 'trying hard to resolve' the issue. Apparently the issues are simply down to the differences in the Norwegian network as Norway uses a slightly different charging adapter than other countries in Europe."

476 comments

  1. units please by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "below zero' Kelvin? (is that you, Frank Herbert?) Centigrade? Farenheit?

    1. Re:units please by sabri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "below zero' Kelvin? (is that you, Frank Herbert?) Centigrade? Farenheit?

      Considering it's Europe and the fact that water freezes at 0 Celsius, my guess would be C.

      --
      I'm not a complete idiot... Some parts are missing.
    2. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One of the linked articles is more clear that they are talking 0 degrees Celcius.

      Tesla owners are complaining about problems recharging the cars in Norway, especially when temperatures drop well below the freezing point.

    3. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 0

      Norway is metric... it's not hard to figure out. The summary just quotes the article.

    4. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go out on a limb here, since I'm not from Norway, and guess that it's in Centigrade. It's in Europe, and very few countries in the world use Fahrenheit. I know, I know... it's completely a guess, and we only like to see facts on this site.

    5. Re:units please by Vanderhoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      0 deg C is the freezing point. Well below is at least -20 deg C to most people in Canada. Heck in the spring when the temperature gets up to -10 deg C people pull out their shorts and t-shirts. It'd be nice if they were just a bit more specific.

    6. Re:units please by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Below zero is a turn of phrase that means freezing, so 0C.

      You also could have looked it up:
      "Liion batteries offer reasonably good charging performance at cooler temperatures and allow fast-charging in a temperature bandwidth of 5 to 45 C (41 to 113 F). Charging should be performed within this temperature range. Below 5 C, the charge current should be reduced, and no charging is permitted at freezing temperatures" from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

      So again, 0C

    7. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not that much of a llmb to go out on... there are 7 nations in the entire world that use Fahrenheit... one of them is the USA, and half of the remaing ones are US territories. The other three are all in the Carribean, iirc. Norway is not in the Carribean.

    8. Re:units please by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      "below zero' Kelvin? (is that you, Frank Herbert?) Centigrade? Farenheit?

      FRANK: Is that you Leto, or has the Kumquat Haagen Dazs finally arrived?

    9. Re:units please by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I don't think they'd work too well at 0F either.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    10. Re:units please by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the article-linked site uses U.S. units. it's hard to figure out

    11. Re:units please by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Centigrade? Farenheit?

      Sometimes it doesn't matter. From Futurama:

      • Leela: Our car broke down and we're low on oxygen. Can we borrow some?
      • Moon Farmer: Borry? Listen here, city girl. Oxygen doesn't grow on trees. You'll have to work it off doing chores on my hydroponic farm. You can go back to your precious park at sun-up.
      • Fry: I guess we can do chores for a few hours.
      • Leela: Fry, night lasts two weeks on the moon.
      • Moon Farmer: Yep, drops down to minus-173.
      • Fry: Celsius or Fahrenheit?
      • Moon Farmer: First one, then the other.
      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    12. Re:units please by tgd · · Score: 1

      "below zero'

      Kelvin? (is that you, Frank Herbert?)
      Centigrade?
      Farenheit?

      Does it matter, relative to the story?

    13. Re:units please by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      They'd do even worse at 0K!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    14. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "below zero'

      Kelvin? (is that you, Frank Herbert?)
      Centigrade?
      Farenheit?

      That's absolute zero my friend.

      Those damn Norwegians and their proprietary weather systems.

    15. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The article linked site quotes from a Norwegian newspaper, "The English News", and Norway uses metric.

    16. Re:units please by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 3, Informative

      yes, many people in the world would be much more concerned about electric car with 32 degree F problem versus one that appears at 0 degrees F (-18 degrees C) Since the problem appears at 0 degrees C, that isn't very cold at all. It was -26 degrees C last night here

    17. Re:units please by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 1

      you have no point at all, that linked site greencar usually converts all measurements to imperial from quoted articles

    18. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i would think that as well, but the mix-n-match doesnt help:

      "dead battery nearly 100 miles from the nearest..."

      So zero Celsius and 100 miles?

    19. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original article doesn't say "zero" it says "below the freezing point" (of pure water, I'm assuming), so I believe it's zero Centigrade.

    20. Re:units please by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Below zero is a turn of phrase that means freezing, so 0C."

      Just no. "Below zero" is a turn of phrase that means "below zero". It is used as much in the United States to mean below 32F as it is elsewhere to mean 0C.

    21. Re:units please by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      They'd do even worse at 0K!

      Actually 0K would make it easier to get superconductive chargers. But your hand would snap off and shatter on the ground when you plug it in. It's probably not a good trade off. ;-)

    22. Re:units please by cs668 · · Score: 1

      In MM when someone says "below zero" it means below 0F. Not sure what it commonly means in the rest of the US though.

    23. Re:units please by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Apologies. Typed too fast. I meant "It is used in the United States to mean below 0F (-17.8C), just as much as it is elsewhere to mean below 0C."

      The point being that the phrase "below zero" means just that... the units you use are irrelevant.

    24. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't. In the U.S. "5 degrees below zero" is not 27 degrees F.

    25. Re:units please by cs668 · · Score: 1

      Damn, not MM, but MN as in Minnesota. Apparently my brain doesn't work when it's below 0. We woke up to -21F this morning :-(

    26. Re:units please by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Just to finish the sentence: ...people pull out their shorts and t-shirts and get them ready for when the temperature goes above 0.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    27. Re:units please by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      0F is "well below the freezing point". 0C is the freezing point.
      So which is it again?

    28. Re:units please by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      Unless the laws of physics have recently been warped by the polar vortex, 0c is NOT "well below freezing" 0F is.

    29. Re:units please by operagost · · Score: 1

      Call us needlessly literal, but in America "below 0" means 0F, which is not "freezing". That's why the units were requested.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    30. Re:units please by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "No, it isn't. In the U.S. "5 degrees below zero" is not 27 degrees F."

      It was a typing mistake. I had already corrected myself. See above.

    31. Re:units please by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      We woke up to -21F this morning :-(

      And how much is that in degrees? :p

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    32. Re:units please by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      0F is "well below the freezing point".

      ...of what?

    33. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do battery cables have to do with the freezing point of water? If they're getting water inside them then they're seriously defective and should not be used at any temperature.

    34. Re:units please by jythie · · Score: 1

      Easily solved by a pair of warm mittens.

    35. Re:units please by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I can't remember where I saw the comic, but it was -10 C Fall vs. Spring. I found a similar one for farenheit, but it's not the one I was thinking of. http://i.imgur.com/qzIm7y1.png

    36. Re:units please by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Just as much???

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      The much warmer 0C is very commonplace throughout every winter in Europe

      Add to that the fact that 0C has some significance (snow and ice threshold), whereas 0F is an insignificant temperature.

      Plus the fact that fahrenheit is used in very few countries. The vast majority of the world uses Celcius.

      So, no, it's certainly not used "just as much". Though a small minority of times the phrase "below zero" is used it might be fahrenheit, worldwide, it far more often means celsius.

    37. Re:units please by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      0 degrees Fahrenheit is well below the freezing point of water at 32. I would not consider "at the freezing point" to be within the statement "well below the freezing point".

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    38. Re:units please by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

      Well as the story is about the temperature in Norway, your antiquated temperature units and meaningless zero level is neither here nor there.

    39. Re:units please by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Rain and puddles tends to be the most significant for drivers.

    40. Re:units please by Pope · · Score: 3, Funny

      3M is headquartered in Minnesota, so it's clear the 3rd one just froze off from the cold.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    41. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is 0 Celsius.

      "Tesla owners are complaining about problems recharging the cars in Norway, especially when temperatures drop well below the FREEZING POINT"

      BTW. Nobody outside US has this dilemma.

    42. Re:units please by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Pretty much everything if you want to be stupid about it

    43. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 0

      That one can't be bothered to check the original story that was being referred to, when a link to it is right there in the story on the greencar website is hardly the fault of anyone but a person who is too lazy or indifferent to check said link.

    44. Re:units please by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Informative

      In fact, it seems this issue has already left one Model S owner stranded with a dead battery nearly 100 miles from the nearest charging station.

      Your quote from Futurama is amusing, but there's something even more amusing, or sad, depending on how you look at it. It's that one dude's car died, and somehow this is a reflection on the entire model line? I live in Minnesota, in the coldest major city by average temperature and up here, every cold snap results in thousands of dead batteries. The number one call out for tow truck companies out here isn't a flat tire but a dead battery. And simple physics provide plenty of explanation for why this is; Yet somehow, out of the thousands of cars that wouldn't start (to the point that it's a running joke: "Come for the low unemployment rate and good schools, stay because your car won't start")... one dude got selected and they say his electric car is somehow defective because of this?

      Dude... if ONE car dies during a cold snap out of the entire model line, that's not a problem, that's an engineering success up here of epic proportions when it comes to cars. Maybe you've heard about our roads? We only have two seaons: Winter and road construction. Believe me... if a line of cars can survive up here and only one of them goes tits up in the cold, then someone's doing it right.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    45. Re:units please by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      "Below zero" is a turn of phrase that means freezing to 96% of the world's population. It is used in the United States to mean below 0F.

      FTFY

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    46. Re:units please by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      0F is the lowest temperature where salt will melt ice.

      On the roads that does matter.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    47. Re:units please by Zcar · · Score: 1

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      Quite a bit, actually. In my hometown in New York in January the average daily low is just above 0F and it was often colder than Anchorage or Fairbanks, Alaska. It wasn't unusual to have daily high temperatures below 0F. The record low was -37F. I'd say below 0F isn't at all unusual above about 40 degrees north latitude in the US except in coastal areas; you're probably talking about 1/3 of the continental US.

    48. Re:units please by cs668 · · Score: 1

      -29.4444C

    49. Re:units please by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      "Pretty much everything" in the universe is hydrogen (well, not counting dark matter, which also doesn't seem to freeze much) --- which you won't find frozen at 0F in many places.

    50. Re:units please by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Myanmar and Liberia are in that august company too.

    51. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's for the same reason that the interwebs are slow in the winter. The pipes get frozen. That's why everyone wants a fat pipe, so there will be some unfrozen space in the center where the bits can flow easily.

    52. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, maybe not. But I've never heard of a gasoline engine car's battery bursting into flames. It's just dangerous to put a giant lithium ion battery into something on the road. Give me safe, leaded gasoline any day!

    53. Re:units please by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      Everywhere I've lived in the US 'below zero' means 'below zero, which is a number, and that number is not 32'.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    54. Re:units please by cs668 · · Score: 2

      Because of the continental climate many of the north central US cities are colder than those in Alaska.

      Were I live in MN for example the average low for January is 3F(-16C), in Embaras MN it is -8F(-22C), the average for Anchorage AK is 8F(-13C).

    55. Re:units please by Timmmm · · Score: 2

      Welcome to England?

      It's actually really annoying that no apps (Google Navigation, MyTracks etc.) let me have distances in miles and metres. It's either miles and feet, or kilometres and metres.

    56. Re:units please by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of a gasoline engine car's battery bursting into flames

      Really?

      https://www.google.co.uk/searc...

    57. Re:units please by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Never mind, totally misread.

    58. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're stranded 100 miles from the nearest charging station, it means you didn't pay attention to the fact that your car wasn't fully charged before you drove off AND you didn't pay attention to the dwindling charge as you drove. This isn't a Tesla failure.

    59. Re:units please by MickLinux · · Score: 2

      Welcome to the era of Rome. 100 miles is 100.000 paces, which is very a very appropriate unit when you are asking OUT OF CHARGE!!!?!?!

      --
      Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    60. Re:units please by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      What does any of this have to do with Mr. Tesla, and what is he charging at?

      Surely he's dead.

      --
      No sig today...
    61. Re:units please by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Go to the original post on http://www.newsinenglish.no/20... and you will find...

      One Tesla owner found himself stranded on Christmas Eve with a dead battery, 150 kilometers from the nearest recharging station.
      ...
      Tesla has confirmed the problems with recharging the cars when thermometers fall under zero, and online debate pages have been full of owners’ problems with the cars’ recharging cables.

      And use a sample site http://met.no/English/Climate_... should now give you an idea which unit they are using. ;)

    62. Re:units please by ls671 · · Score: 1

      They'd do even worse at 0K!

      Wrong! At this point, they achieve superconductivity which tends toward infinite conductivity ;-)) hehe...

      "An electric current flowing through a loop of superconducting wire can persist indefinitely with no power source"

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    63. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norway doesn't use miles either.

    64. Re:units please by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Depends how you interpret it. Hydrogen is one element. There are many more. The majority of elements are solid at 0F

    65. Re:units please by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?"

      You would probably be surprised just how often it is. (Especially now, in the coldest winter in the Eastern U.S. in decades.) Even here, it usually gets below 0F at least one day each winter, sometimes more.

      Your point is taken that there are probably more people in Europe who experience 0C than there are in the U.S. who experience 0 degrees F. But even people who don't experience it still talk about it.

      I am left with the impression that you deliberately tried to find a loophole in my comment, just to argue.

    66. Re:units please by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between needing a set of jumper cables to get going again, and the Tesla's inability to move itself with a cold (dead) battery though. I keep jumper cables in my car because my battery is weak to begin with.

      --
      LRN 2 SWM
    67. Re:units please by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Counting by "number of elements," though, seems pretty arbitrary. Atomic matter only represents a small portion of the kinds of particles that can exist in the universe --- it's arbitrary to count trace elements in the ``freezable stuff'' category, but exclude the fact that you don't get neutrino crystals or Higgs boson clods icing up the freezer. Doing the count by mass-energy doesn't require so many arbitrary categories of which kinds of objects to count or ignore.

    68. Re:units please by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Just as much???

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      The much warmer 0C is very commonplace throughout every winter in Europe

      Add to that the fact that 0C has some significance (snow and ice threshold), whereas 0F is an insignificant temperature.

      Plus the fact that fahrenheit is used in very few countries. The vast majority of the world uses Celcius.

      So, no, it's certainly not used "just as much". Though a small minority of times the phrase "below zero" is used it might be fahrenheit, worldwide, it far more often means celsius.

      There are places in the US that quite regularly get below 0F; the northern Great Plains are cold (and windy) as hell in the winter.

    69. Re:units please by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if troll:

      I have heard of a gasoline engine car's main energy storage mechanism bursting into flames. It happens pretty often.

    70. Re:units please by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      In Denver (middle of the country) it gets well below 0F a few times a year at least, in January - sometimes for a week or two at a time.

      In the mountains it is often at 0F or colder during the winter.

      0F may not seem like a distinction to those used to 0C, but it is a distinction anyway as people take the cold much more seriously than somewhere below freezing. With the sun out the range of 20F - 40F can feel pretty similar, nothing makes 0F feel that warm.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    71. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you're a hit at parties.

    72. Re:units please by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      The trick is finding the right parties. I pity those who can't gain admission to the kind of party that might, at any instant, break out into a debate on particle physics, philosophy, and beer.

    73. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 1

      No... but what part of the article mentioned miles?

    74. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum gas goes below absolute zero

      Ultracold atoms pave way for negative-Kelvin materials.

      http://www.nature.com/news/quantum-gas-goes-below-absolute-zero-1.12146

    75. Re: units please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Nothing. The problems were discovered in August and apparently have nothing to do with the temperature.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    76. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other three are all in the Carribean. IIRC, Norway is not in the Carribean.

      I prefer to punctuate that slightly differently.

    77. Re:units please by alva_edison · · Score: 1

      If you're stranded 100 miles from the nearest charging station, it means you didn't pay attention to the fact that your car wasn't fully charged before you drove off AND you didn't pay attention to the dwindling charge as you drove. This isn't a Tesla failure.

      We do not know if the car was fully charged or not.

      Also, I could be mistaken, but I believe the Tesla only reports the expected range not the charge level.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
    78. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell if troll:

      I have heard of a gasoline engine car's main energy storage mechanism bursting into flames. It happens pretty often.

      Nonsense, we don't build cars out of self-fissionable material, we use steel. Well, steel, plastic and aluminum anyway. So the main energy storage in that sense is the same for gas and electrics.

      The other guy linked to petrol station fires, we don't have that crap in America, we use safe gasoline - hence him realizing his error. I even add lead to my gasoline to keep it classic formula style for extra safety and power. Besides there are powerplant fires too, which electric cars can only increase.

      The primary store of dangerous ELECTRICAL energy, like lightning bolts from heaven, is in a nice safe lead acid battery in a real card. Those electrics are dangerous - they used Ion batteries to shoot at star destroyers in movies - no reason to have that in a car - an AK47 or AR15 is good enough. Also, in case it's still too subtle, the sought after mod was funny.

    79. Re:units please by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It just sounds utterly ridiculous that the car would be unable to charge at 0 degree Celsius. You don't need to go to Norway to find those kinds of temperatures. 0 F (-32 C), now, sounds more reasonable.

    80. Re:units please by dwater · · Score: 1

      right...stupid apostrophe use again...

      --
      Max.
    81. Re:units please by laie_techie · · Score: 1

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      Northern Utah went below 0F for a couple of days in December. I must admit, though, that sub-zero and below-freezing are more common terms here.

    82. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well ... you're assuming we're counting by mass.

      I rather thought the GP was counting materials. So, yes, the hydrogen and helium won't freeze at at 0F, that's 2 things. Then there's lead, and diamond and graphite and buckyballs and polyvinyl chloride - they're all solid at 0F. And red leicester, Jarlsberg, cheddar, mucus ... so on....

    83. Re:units please by femtobyte · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but if we are counting distinct structures without reference to frequency, then I can cite every arbitrary configuration of fundamental fields that bobbles in and out of vacuum fluctuations --- the majority of which special beasties are not particularly freezable. For every variety of leicester in the universe, there are a near-innumerable number of arbitrary configurations of photons and neutrinos. Without imposing a rather circular definition that the only things that count towards "pretty much everything" are those things which are generally solid, there's far more kinds of ephemeral "everything" than enumerated cheeses.

    84. Re:units please by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I punctuated it the way I did because from my recollection, all of the nations that are not US territories and which use Fahrenheit are in the Carribean.

      Do you know something about Norway and the Carribean that I do not?

    85. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That restriction seems weird. Sure, the chemistry itself might not indicate charging at low temperatures, but this is an engineering issue. why not just have electric resistance heating surrounding the batteries to keep them in the optimum temperature band? If you're charging, you have access to electric power. I doubt it'd be a whole lot lost once up to temperature, depending on how well insulated they can be (they need to reject heat while discharging and charging in the summer, I guess, so that's a design constraint) and how much heat is generated from internal resistance during charging itself.

      If storage at cold temperatures isn't an issue, charging shouldn't be a problem.

      Of course, we live in a world where laptop manufacturers still don't include automatic hardware cutoff to protect the battery from overcharging, instead asking users to disconnect the power supply when fully charged. Including on devices that are advertised as "desktop replacements" where such a charging profile would result in vastly increasing the number of battery discharge cycles, shortening the life anyway.

    86. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the story also states that the problem seems to be isolated to the Norwegian charging cable. Which means most people, even most Tesla owners, can ignore it.

    87. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the stuff on this planet freezes at much higher temperatures. Somewhere between 600 C and 1500 C, typically.

    88. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped caring after the first apostrophe. The one dumped for no reason into the middle of the word Teslas.

    89. Re: units please by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      In what world is zero f negative thirty two c though? The plot thickens.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    90. Re: units please by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I've never heard it used that way, though freezing can mean as high as 45f in my experience, below zero is clearly below 0f

      Perhaps in areas where it never gets that cold things are different (we get 1-3 nights below 0f in a typical year here).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    91. Re:units please by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Probably, I would be shocked if the Tesla has a charging issue at 0c. If it does then someone needs a swift in the rear. Odds are it is 0f. If it is 0k then forget about global warming the sun has gone out and we are all doomed.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    92. Re: units please by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      My apologies, I can never get this conversion right (even though I know the definition of either units). Yes, it's -18 C. But the point still stands.

    93. Re: units please by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the article started the confusion.

      Even at 0f it should be fine if the battery isn't fucked.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    94. Re:units please by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Thats the problem of 2 types of measurement. In the UK if its cold the general public tend to use celcius because 0C looks "colder" than 32F and if its hot we use Fahrenheit because 90F looks "hotter" than 32C.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    95. Re:units please by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      have you heard of a gasoline tank bursting into flames????

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    96. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that /. is US-based, the use of Fahrenheit in the summary would be equally valid.

    97. Re:units please by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      EVs are actually better in cold weather if you can keep them plugged in. They can keep the heat on low to maintain a reasonable temperature for both driver and the battery pack without sacrificing any range.

      The problem here is with the charging system, it's not a general problem with EVs or EV batteries.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    98. Re:units please by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      But I've never heard of a gasoline engine car's battery bursting into flames.

      And I've never heard of an electric car's gas tank bursting into flames.

    99. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference here is that you can still easily get that dead battery ICE car started and running. The same cannot be said about this dude's Tesla.

    100. Re:units please by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      Miles and yards would do, but I agree miles and feet (or miles and 0.1 miles) is just irritating.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    101. Re:units please by CadentOrange · · Score: 1

      I've never seen anyone use Fahrenheit in the UK, certainly not in the way you suggest.

    102. Re:units please by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. I have not the slightest idea what Fahrenheit temperatures are other than a few fixed points that I know map to particular points on the Celsius scale (-40, 32, 212). You rarely hear the weather forecasters mention Fahrenheit these days. Maybe older people think like that, but anyone under 45 at a minimum is going to have been exclusively taught in metric units.

    103. Re:units please by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      if you read the papers especially when there is a freak heat wave, you will notice. i've lived here for long enough to fall into that trap

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    104. Re:units please by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      ever tried reading the tabloid headlines during a freak weather event i.e. heat wave? i do agree though that it is an old school thing, the UK has been metric for a long long time now and its got to wait until the "old school" die off before Fahrenheit is forgotten

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    105. Re:units please by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I'm UK, and I haven't seen or heard anyone use Farenheit in as long as I can remember. And that includes in the (dead tree) papers I read (which would, indeed, talk about the temperature breaking 30, 35, 40, etc.)- maybe I'm just reading a better class of paper?

      Last time anyone I knew was talking about temperatures in Farenheit was back when my parent's home (my childhood home) had a Farenheit-labeled themostat dating from when the house was built in the early 70s. That thermostat was replaced a decade and a half ago. Since then, not even my grandparents use it anymore...

    106. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need a large pipe, just keep a lot of alternating 0s and 1s, like '010101...' for a while.
      Packets like this have substantially higher-than-normal friction, thus gradually defrosting the pipe.

    107. Re:units please by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      We've had highs of -3 for almost 2 weeks of the last month in Wisconsin, too. But what really kills you is the wind chill :P

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    108. Re:units please by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Except that oxygen kind of literally *does* grow on trees...

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    109. Re:units please by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I came to the comment section to see how long it took somebody to mention this. DICE seems to have it out for Tesla.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    110. Re:units please by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      A) Even though the article is about Norway, are they expecting Americans to read it and catering to their temperature scale? But more importantly,
      B) Have the "editors" managed to fuck it up even if the article got it right (very likely)?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    111. Re:units please by aestrivex · · Score: 1

      A: The Tesla model S cannot charge below 0 K.
      B: The sun has gone out and we are all doomed.

      Worth noting that in the quantum sense neither of these propositions have much meaning, but let us take them in the Newtonian sense. In this sense a reasonable person would probably assent that A seems like it is probably true and B seems like it is probably false.

      I do not see how the proposition (A->B) follows?

    112. Re:units please by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      If the Tesla in Norway was having trouble charging at 0k then the sun must have gone out. Actually the Tesla can not charge at 0k because one can not reach 0k.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    113. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0 deg C is the freezing point. Well below is at least -20 deg C to most people in Canada. Heck in the spring when the temperature gets up to -10 deg C people pull out their shorts and t-shirts. It'd be nice if they were just a bit more specific.

      This past week, we reached -40C or -40F, when you include the windchill factor. At that temp, you are advised to have a face mask, and a hood. My car started just fine.

      Teslas problems are problems that arise after becoming apparent with first-time user experiences. Tesla will iron out the bug, and yes, it is an inconvenience to first-in buyers. The battery may require extra charging current to warm it up during the charging process until the battery is warm. Thats my guess.

    114. Re:units please by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      In fact, it seems this issue has already left one Model S owner stranded with a dead battery nearly 100 miles from the nearest charging station.

      Your quote from Futurama is amusing, but there's something even more amusing, or sad, depending on how you look at it. It's that one dude's car died, and somehow this is a reflection on the entire model line?

      Yes indeed, this issue is an indictment of the entire Tesla line of cars, and shows that Electric cars are an abject failure, because of cold.

      We just won't talk about gelled diesel fuel, or motor oil, or starter batteries, or diesel starting issues that affect the "Real Vehicles" in the cold - that's different?

      For those of us who have never experienced sub-zero weather, the colder it gets, the more weird stuff you have to do to keep any vehicle running. Crankcase heaters, battery heaters, radiator restrictors, and a few other items. Many large truck owners just don't turn their trucks off when it's cold.

      I've heard of - but never seen - truckers who have to build small fires under their oil pans to heat their engines enough to turn them over when their engines assume ambient at these temps. I did have one experience where my van refused to turn over at -23 degrees (Yes Farenheit) The oil was so thick at that temp that the starter couldn't turn it over.

      So rather than a fatal flaw of the Tesla, it just shows that a small refinement is needed in cold weather. That might be that at a certain point, a battery heater might be needed, Just like in "Real Vehicles" And that perhaps some sort of magik devises, like the plugs that people with "Real Vehicles" plug into to provide some electricity for heaters, perhaps this isn't actually much of a problem at all.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    115. Re:units please by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Never mind, totally misread.

      There is this:

      http://archive.firstcoastnews....

      Wasn't in the car, but it did go kaboom. Burned the guys legs ad did a lot of smoke damage to the house.

      Those old school lead acid batteries can pump out a lot of current if allowed to.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    116. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whilst the USA might be having an unusually cold snap, how often is the temp below 0F there, other than Alaska?

      Plenty of other people have already pointed out that many places in the northern US regularly experience sub-zero temperatures, but I'd like to add that even in the middle latitudes the apparent temperature (adjusted for the effects of wind chill and humidity) is quite often below 0F in the wintertime.

    117. Re:units please by palion · · Score: 1

      Hey, I live in Switzerland, and 0 degrees is not uncommon in winter (you nonmetric folks call that "32 degrees fahrenheit"). No cable gets unusable at this temperature. It gets a bit more stiff, but that's all.

      If I go outside in winter I get a bit more stiff too.

      --
      Well, well
    118. Re:units please by palion · · Score: 1

      Now 0 fahrenheit are 18 degrees celsius and that's quite cold. But it's not uncommon to get that cold in winter in the mountains. In the regions where the rich people have their winter houses it gets that cold often, and these are the common Tesla clients. I am sure that in St. Moritz there is more than one Tesla driving around.

      --
      Well, well
    119. Re: units please by palion · · Score: 1

      That's right. For exactly this purpose the "ReheatCable"-encoding was invented at polar university in Hammerfest, Norway, where each 1 is transmitted als 101010101010 and each 0 as 010101010101.

      --
      Well, well
    120. Re:units please by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I watch BBC news at least twice a day, and I don't even recall the last time I heard Fahrenheit mentioned.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    121. Re: units please by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      The cold causes any oxygen present to liquify which in turn causes the packets to skid.

      This is why Monster Cables are best.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    122. Re:units please by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You don't know 98.6F?

    123. Re:units please by Zynder · · Score: 1

      I reject your notions, partly because they are a debasement of science, but mostly because I don't get invited to those sort of parties.

    124. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey there bud. Even though you have a six digit UID, it isn't low enough for you to use the word "august" in any other fashion than referring to the month.

      signed, Slashdot Old Farts.

    125. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I get is static on 98.6F. But what's another 100khz to you insensitive clods!

    126. Re: units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People constantly ask me if i'm feeling 0k when i have a cold.

    127. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the UK has been metric for a long long time now...

      Is that why we in the UK have to walk miles to get a pint? ;)

    128. Re:units please by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How many Farad is that?

    129. Re:units please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Below zero in the U.S. is below 0F.

    130. Re:units please by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      "The number one call out for tow truck companies out here isn't a flat tire but a dead battery"

      The number one callout for rescue services _everywhere_ in a cold snap (even when it isn't freezing) is a dead battery. People don't think to maintain/check the things and so they get caught out.

    131. Re:units please by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Brine

  2. Self-solving problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Funny

    People disincentivized into buying electric cars, increasing CO2 emissions, raising planetary temperatures until electric cars work.

    1. Re:Self-solving problem by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      People disincentivized into buying electric cars, increasing CO2 emissions, raising planetary temperatures until electric cars work.

      Is that how Dick Cheney logic works?

    2. Re:Self-solving problem by Talderas · · Score: 1

      But then temperatures rise, electric cars become prevalent and then temperatures drop and they cease working. Then we have to break out all the gas powered cars until the temperature rises enough that electric works again.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:Self-solving problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Since we're pretending this isn't just a joke:

      I think you're overestimating the rate at which life on the planet can consume atmospheric carbon dioxide. It's actually quite slow, compared to which burning fossil fuels can put it out.

    4. Re:Self-solving problem by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I have a bridge in Canada to sell you.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    5. Re:Self-solving problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Blithely accusing others of naivety, in defense of the scientifically unfounded: an activity I'm tired of dealing with.

    6. Re:Self-solving problem by Talderas · · Score: 2

      As Mune, from Chrono Trigger, once said, "I'm the wind! Whoosh!"

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    7. Re:Self-solving problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm going to plead justified ignorance. I have no clue what you're talking about.

    8. Re:Self-solving problem by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      does this (ice)bridge lead to merry siberia?

    9. Re:Self-solving problem by Talderas · · Score: 1

      Very well, I shall ruin the joke by explaining it.

      My original response was not serious but rather intentionally absurd, in line with your own absurd joke. You, erroneously, took it as a statement of truth. To that I responded with "I've got a bridge in Canada to sell you" which is an idiom traditionally opened with the line "If you belief that." I believe you correctly saw the idiom but since you had believed my original reply to be serious rather than a joke you incorrectly interpreted it as suggesting that I was calling what you were saying bullshit. I then responded with a quote by the video game character Mune, from Chrono Trigger, where he pretends to be the wind and wooshes about thus suggesting that my comments wooshed by you as per standard when someone doesn't get a joke.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    10. Re:Self-solving problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "disincentivized" isn't a verb.
      "disincentivized" doesn't actually exist, you made it up...

      I think you mean "discouraged from", not "disincentivized into" - LOL....

      You Americans...

    11. Re:Self-solving problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If CO2 emissions actually caused the temperature to go up, then your idea would work.

    12. Re:Self-solving problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you clearly knew what he meant, eurofag.

    13. Re:Self-solving problem by spitzak · · Score: 1

      He said "Since we're pretending this isn't just a joke:" at the start, so he obviously did not think it was serious.

    14. Re:Self-solving problem by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Please note, changing from gasoline cars to electrical cars has no effect, one way or the other, on CO2 emissions.

    15. Re:Self-solving problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      So, my idea works! Yay!

  3. Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What's with all the anti-Tesla articles?

    1. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      News you don't like is still news.

    2. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by mark-t · · Score: 0

      It's less about news that we don't like and seems more like news that doesn't like Tesla. Which can be hard to call unbiased and objective.

    3. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      Really? This is the first submission I've seen that includes articles from greencarreports.com that aren't completely apologetic to Tesla.

      Not to mention, just because you don't like the facts the news presents doesn't mean it's not news.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      But it's okay to report on a flaw in an Intel chip or a software patch which breaks a person's system, right?

      This has nothing to do with being biased. It's reporting on a known issue which affects those who bought a Tesla, just like people who bought that certain Intel chip or installed the patch.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re: Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just brain gas from people who are jealous of actual Tesla owners.

    6. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by OhPlz · · Score: 1

      News you don't like is still news.

      Is that the new Fox News motto?

    7. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, sometimes it is not. For example, the recent reporting on Microsoft removing a version of TOR that was used maliciously...much of that was actually hysterical nonsensical reporting that failed to note what was actually happening in favor of the hyperbole ridden claims of Microsoft destroying TOR!

      The same applies to some reports about Intel bugs.

    8. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is it news to report "the sky is blue", day after day after day?

    9. RE: Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was actually the Tesla owners that took this to media after spending month(s) with this issue only to be ignored by tesla. But I guess you rather want such news to be censored even though it is a very real issue.

    10. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Even if it's a single case of it happening to a Tesla and if you do the numbers, you're way more likely to have the same problem with gasoline vehicles. Which has almost always been the case so far.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:Someone's got a hate on for Tesla by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But it's okay to report on a flaw in an Intel chip or a software patch which breaks a person's system, right?

      This has nothing to do with being biased. It's reporting on a known issue which affects those who bought a Tesla, just like people who bought that certain Intel chip or installed the patch.

      The reporting isn't the issue.

      What is at issue is the smug self serving folks that apparently think this is a fatal flaw, while at the same time people are plugging their crankcase heaters and batttery heaters, and sometimes leaving their gasoline and diesel powered vehicles running all night.

      All vehicles have issues in the cold. The colder it gets, the more issues..

      Although in some small defense of the idea that there are people who wish no well on Tesla, we really don't seem many stories about someone that has trouble getting their car started because of gelled fuel or a dead starter battery, do we?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  4. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because they are awesome from a technological standpoint? And there is a large crossover between computer geeks and people who like cars?

  5. Cold Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Batteries are having trouble charging in the cold!?! Nah, that never happens! /sarcasm

  6. Blaming the cables? by hubang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd think the batteries would be the problem. Running serious current through the wires should keep them warm even in cold weather. Plus, conductivity should go up with colder temperature.

    Now the batteries on the other hand.... Batteries don't hold charge very well in the cold. It's been one of the two big problems for electric cars since the 19th century.

    1. Re:Blaming the cables? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thing is, a number of people have indicated that they have used third-party cables and those have solved the issue.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    2. Re:Blaming the cables? by Mryll · · Score: 1

      Hmm maybe the plug/interface on the cable is failing with size contraction somehow?

    3. Re:Blaming the cables? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      As I understand the chemistry, they do in fact hold the charge just fine. They just become unable to release it as well. Easily demonstrable with a cell phone using similar Li-ION tech - take it outside and let to go to minus 20C and you'll see the charge indicator go low after usage that would normally only use about half of the charge in normal condition. Get it back inside and let it warm up and charge indicator goes back up to show the about half of the charge that remains.

      I live in Finland and use one of the older nokia phones that has to survive the cold-warm environment switching on daily basis, so I'm quite familiar with the mechanics.

    4. Re:Blaming the cables? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Thing is, a number of people have indicated that they have used third-party cables and those have solved the issue.

      Does using a third-party cable void the warranty, or violate the EULA?

      Funky cold Medina, did I just say "violate the EULA" when talking about a fucking car? That is kind of depressing...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now the batteries on the other hand.... Batteries don't hold charge very well in the cold. It's been one of the two big problems for electric cars since the 19th century.

      Actually, batteries tend to hold charge very well when cold. Cool/cold and dry is typically the recommended (below freezing or not varies).
      The problem is that they aren't very willing to let go of, or accept new, charge when cold - just as most any chemical process slow down when it's cold. This makes it hard to draw current to run the car or to charge the batteries back up.

    6. Re:Blaming the cables? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Looking a little deeper than the summary (or really the linked articles for that matter). It appears to not really have much of anything to do with the cold. According to Tesla it has to do with the charging system having difficulties interfacing with the Norwegian electric grid--which is evidently different from the rest of Europe and North America. These difficulties have apparently been on going for a while now. The problem just happened to make headlines since it's all nice and cold now and people are stranded when *gasp* their car doesn't have the charge they assumed it had (but didn't pay attention). Around the world in similarly or much colder climates drivers are not experiencing this problem.

      Evidently, the system for detecting whether or not to send current to the pack is tripping early leaving them uncharged. Attentive owners are able to unplug then reinsert the charging cable and proceed to charge. Unfortunately drivers either not paying attention or using convenience features--such as charging at particular times--are expecting the car to be charged when they head out and finding otherwise--sometimes too late into their trips.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    7. Re:Blaming the cables? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      This has always been my concern with electric cars. Batteries do not work well in the cold. I live in the part of the USA where Norwegians settled because it reminded them of home. Except we were having a heat wave at the time, and now it's colder. A warm gasoline or diesel engine will generally keep running no matter how cold it gets, so by the time you are any distance from the safety of your home, you have the safety of a running car with a working heater until you run out of fuel (assuming you have not filled with #2 diesel, which turns to gel in the cold). An electric car that relies entirely on batteries will get you just far enough from home to be in danger when the batteries have, due to temperature, become unable to move the car or to provide heat for the occupants.

      I think an electric car would be great for the summer months. Maybe they should market electric motorcycles. But in the winter, living in a rural area where the ambient daytime temperatures are often -15C and occasionally -45C or worse, electric vehicles have a long battle to prove that they are as safe as their gasoline and diesel powered counterparts.

    8. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually not a problem for any connector with some amps flowing through it. However, Tesla charger firmware is designed to detect this problem and reduce current or shut down, So the bad junction doesn't get a chance to heat up.

    9. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would think the kind of person who can afford a Model S could also afford a space heater for their garage...

    10. Re:Blaming the cables? by sribe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thing is, a number of people have indicated that they have used third-party cables and those have solved the issue.

      So it's obviously that the skin-effect electrons are out of phase with the ones in the middle, or that the wire is in the cable backward because, as everybody knows, the electrons flow through wire more easily in the same direction in which the wire was extruded. And that, of course, is why Monster brand charging cables would solve the problems ;-)

    11. Re:Blaming the cables? by Nos. · · Score: 1

      I can see it being the cables. Having lived in one of the colder parts of southern Canada all my life, I can tell you that the extension cord you use matters. It's not as big of an issue now as it used to be, but I remember plenty of times thinking I've plugged my car in only to come out in the morning and realize it wasn't when I tried to start it. In these cases, I believe the issue was that the cord, and specifically the plastic around the female end contracted making it every difficult to force the male end in. Sure, once current was flowing there would be some heat generated, though I'm not sure it would be enough to help.

    12. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.
      Lithium ion batteries are actually stored for long term by being charged up to half and frozen.

    13. Re:Blaming the cables? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Actually this has been a concern with ALL cars. ICE cars don't work all that well in cold either. Ranging from cars refusing to start, lead batteries dying out and not supplying power to starter, fuel lines freezing, fuel filters failing, computer systems dying from condencation/corrosion damage and a vast multitude of over issues, northern climate proves a massive challenge to automotive industry even today. Not to even mention the whole "diesels don't work in the cold" issue we had until very recent times, I'd say this argument has been done to death and then some.

      Batteries themselves actually fare pretty well in general.

    14. Re:Blaming the cables? by guantamanera · · Score: 1

      Now the batteries on the other hand.... Batteries don't hold charge very well in the cold. It's been one of the two big problems for electric cars since the 19th century.

      The charge still is in the battery, and it does not just magically disapear. Batteries release of power is a chemical reactions, and that reacction happens to slow down as it gets colder. But the power does not magically just vanish.

    15. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% correct. It isn't the cables but the batteries. EVERY battery has an effect temperature range from which it will charge best and worse, and all that I know of do NOT work well in cold weather.

      I thought any high school student knew this. What are they teaching kids in schools these days, besides how to put a condom on a banana?

    16. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no! It's exactly the same problem that only true audiophiles can appreciate. Clearly, they are using some inferior cable that is incapable of accurately reproducing the highs and lows of the electrons. Are the cables make of oxygen-free copper? With gold-plated connections? Are those cables decoupled from the ground? The last thing you would want is to run those precious electrons across a cold ground. In a pinch, you can use these cable elevators to improve the fidelity of your power... http://www.musicdirect.com/p-971-cable-elevators.aspx It worked for my $7000 HDMI cables...

    17. Re:Blaming the cables? by NewWorldDan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Electricity is a funny thing. Had a problem with a piece of electronics that we make. The CPU wouldn't boot up if it was colder than about 20F. It turns out that the CPU has an internal voltage regulator that relies on an external capacitor. My engineer used an electrolytic cap, and at around 20F, the series resistance of the cap exceeded the tolerances of the CPU's voltage regulator and it went into a perpetual brown-out reset. Now, if the chip was up and running, it was happy and kept running, even if it got cold. So it's fixed now, but for some older hardware in the field with the problem, we don't send firmware updates between December and March. That's just one of many bits of stupid we've encountered over the years. In short, every piece of electronics you develop needs to be tested in the most absurd conditions you can find. And even that won't be enough. Never underestimate the creative stupidity of your customers.

    18. Re:Blaming the cables? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I have found that batteries fare very poorly in general in the cold. That includes the starting battery on my car, the battery in my phone, the battery in my camera, and every other battery of any chemistry that I have exposed to the cold. The difference is that an internal combustion engine warms up as you get farther down the road, reducing the risk of failure due to the cold. In other words, cold-related failure of a gasoline car is most likely to occur in your driveway where you can walk inside and survive. It seems that electric cars increase the risk of failure as you drive away in the cold. People who become stranded in a gasoline powered car with adequate fuel and do the right thing by staying with the car tend to survive. Electric cars that accomplish the same results are certainly possible, but not yet proven.

    19. Re:Blaming the cables? by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Solid state batteries based on Ni-MH and Li-ION fair quite decently in cold actually. It's the liquid state ones, such as lead batteries that have severe problems.

      Also internal combustion cars have severe problems with hot engine and cold fuel lines leading to it among other things. Just because your engine is running warm doesn't mean that things like fuel lines are. Not to even mention that you need completely different fuel and fuel filters on diesels to even run in the cold.\

      As for electric cars proving this, I'm afraid this has already been proven. Priuses have been sold here for about a decade now. They work fine. This is no longer cutting edge new technology, but one that has been in the wild for a good decade and survived the test of time. Hybrids are only becoming more and more popular here in Nordics due to even increasing fuel prices and their excellent fuel economy. To an extent they are actually more reliable in the cold than pure ICE cars as they have less problems with cold starting, especially when compared to the other fuel economy car option which is turbo diesel.

    20. Re:Blaming the cables? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      My experience with solid-state batteries differs significantly from yours. Maybe it's just colder here in North Dakota. :)

      Also, the Prius's heater uses engine coolant. It apparently has an auxiliary electric heat source and water pump to keep the cabin heated when the gasoline engine is shut off, but if they put the car together in a remotely sane manner that should result in redundancy rather than an additional point of failure. If the batteries or the gas engine fails you in the Prius, you still should not freeze to death.

      In a Tesla, though, if the batteries fail you then you will freeze to death. While the same is true for the fuel line and pump on a gasoline car or, much greater risk because of fuel gelling, on a diesel car, I have not personally witnessed a properly maintained gasoline car that started and reached operating temperature fail because of fuel delivery issues, in a climate where -40C happens at least annually and for roughly three consecutive months each year the temperature does not exceed -10C on more than a small handful of days.

      And that's what I mean about the Tesla being unproven. We have a century of gasoline and diesel engine experience so we know how to keep them working in extreme cold and the risk of problems is a known quantity. We also have a solid understanding of how to survive in the event of various problems that can arise. (As an example, if you are stuck in the snow but the engine is running, you ensure that the exhaust is clear so it can escape to atmosphere and then you stay in the car for warmth and safety.) For a hybrid like the Prius, the risks should be both similar to those in a gas car and also mitigated by intelligent engineering of redundant systems. They are still uncommon here, but that is likely more because they have low ground clearance than because they are hybrid. For a purely electric car, though, we have no experience keeping them running in extreme cold and the risk of problems is an unknown quantity. We also do not have a good understanding of how to survive if a problem arises. What do you do if you are stranded in cold weather by a dead battery and help will not arrive until morning?

      Everything I have identified as a risk of electric cars can surely be quantified and likely be mitigated. But with gas cars we have a century of experience to draw on. It will be a long time before the same can be said for electric cars. And during that time, I will let people in populated areas where help or alternative transportation is within a 5-minute walk at all times learn and fix the problems before I incur the risk of a frozen battery leading to my own freezing to death.

    21. Re:Blaming the cables? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I have a Pentium 4 desktop I can ship to the arctic circle - shipping might cost a bit though.

    22. Re:Blaming the cables? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      First of all, li-ion covers a very wide range of batteries. Automotive batteries generally can function in around -20 to -30 celcius temperatures, although their capacity dimishes. This is nothing new - a lot of things like mining equipment and such includes high capacity batteries that must function in extreme cold for prolonged periods of time.

      Once again: this is NOT untested technology, even though a lot of people with agenda like to claim it is. And it's true that some li-ion batteries are downright dysfunctional in cold. One case that comes to mind were apple's iphone batteries from 1st and 2nd gen iphones, which they actually had the balls to sell in Nordics with a statement that you could not use them in temperatures under 0C. They got hammered for it by consumer protection agencies which pointed out that law required them to sell products fit for local climate, and most Nordics hit -30C during winters.

      At the same time nokia used li-ion batteries that work just fine in the cold, party because a lot of testing was done here in Finland, in the cold climate. Which is why my old nokia, while it does indeed lose some capacity while out in the cold, it will continue to function just fine. Just recently we had -25C and I took about hour an a half walks to my local sports hall and back, which means that it went from ~25C to -25C, worked in -25C for about 45 minutes, went into ~20C while I was playing, then hit -25C for another 45 minute walk. And I am a person that likes to watch videos off my phone while walking, which due to my phone not supporting proper hardware acceleration drain the battery in about three hours in the summer climate. When I am arriving home, the phone usually shows that it has about 20% capacity left in the battery. After it warms up back to the room temperature, it shows I have over 40%.

      So it is indeed quite possible that batteries sold to you included chemistry not intended for cold weather. But there are batteries that are indeed designed to be able to operate in cold weathers, and as far as I know, automotive batteries do in fact belong in that category.

      I would like to emphasize this one more time. This is NOT new and untested technology. Neither various Ni-MH nor various Li-ion technologies are anything new in use in cold climate. And just because your specific battery happens to not work well in cold doesn't mean that all batteries are like that.

    23. Re:Blaming the cables? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      " electric vehicles have a long battle to prove that they are as safe as their gasoline and diesel powered counterparts."

      i think they've already proved they are safer than gasoline, they've only got to prove as good in the cold and get a longer range.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    24. Re:Blaming the cables? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      They do have a battery heating system. So once the car is "running", it will be OK. The problem here was just charging it, apparently.

    25. Re:Blaming the cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that, in this case. Norway has an unusual no-neutral electrical wiring system where all phases are live, and ground is locally provided. Because of that, the apparent voltage difference between ground and live can be variable and unsteady; the Tesla charger incorrectly interprets this as a grounding fault and shuts down.

      (The actual phase-to-phase voltage is, as I've understood it, solidly in spec and one of the better in Europe.)

    26. Re:Blaming the cables? by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      Thanks for one sensible answer, more than half way down the thread. Now, can we all guess what is it about Norwegian supply that is so different? Different rules for things connected? Current limitations when most distribution is overhead, or run from more distant step-down, different lengths for charging leads... or what?

    27. Re:Blaming the cables? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I live in Finland

      I feel pretty secure taking advice from Finns on the cold, as I like to tell people that you know Finns are badass when you find out they fought the Russians in the Winter War and the *Russians* were freezing to death!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    28. Re:Blaming the cables? by notonthegrid · · Score: 1

      Cables used to recharge electic cars don't work very well after you have
      driven over them a few times with your dually diesel one-ton pickup truck
      because your wife left them drapped across the gravel driveway.

    29. Re:Blaming the cables? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the Tesla, but my Ampera (the European version of the Chevrolet Volt) has a conditioning system for the batteries that cools or heats to keep them in the optimum range either when plugged in or when driving (although the latter also costs battery capacity). You can tell the car at what time you leave in the morning so that it can pre-condition the batteries for the ride.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

      I'd be surprised if the tesla wouldn't have something similar.

  7. Edgar Hansen Was Right by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Apparently the issues are simply down to the differences in the Norwegian network as Norway uses a slightly different charging adapter than other countries in Europe.

    There is a right way, a wrong way, and a Norwegian way. --Edgar Hansen, Northwestern, Deadliest Catch

    1. Re:Edgar Hansen Was Right by Shinobi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, as the joke goes here in Sweden:

      Why are there no mental asylums in Norway?
      It'd cost too much to put walls and a roof over the whole country....

    2. Re:Edgar Hansen Was Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unlike what we say about Georgia in the US:
      Too small to be its own country, too big to be its own insane asylum.

    3. Re:Edgar Hansen Was Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd cost too much to put walls and a roof over the whole country....

      Wonko the Sane says "You're doing it wrong."

    4. Re:Edgar Hansen Was Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, that was my first thought too!

      Captcha: simplify

  8. batteries? Inefficient in the cold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm shocked I tell you! Well, not really because it's cold out and the batteries aren't charged.

  9. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by xlv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    newsflash: batteries generate electricty from stored chemical energy

  10. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    How do think a battery works exactly?

    Or is this years model S using some sort of super capacitor now?

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  11. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am reminded why most lifeforms has been storing energy chemically, as opposed to electrically, for billions of years.

    But... batteries store energy as chemical energy.

  12. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by anyanka · · Score: 1

    ...and how do you suppose a battery works?

  13. In Norway this is a problem by kaliann · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, it's related to the cold, but it also appears to be related to the specific issues of Norway's grid.

    Some speculation is that the problem involves too-extreme fluctuations in the electricity provided by that grid and a charger-side software-mediated shutoff of charging. If that's the case, then this might be another charger issue that can be solved with an over-the-air "patch" like some of the previous problems.

    While this is definitely a concern for Tesla and their Norwegian customers, it doesn't seem to be relevant to cars in North America.

    1. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because the American power grids are rock steady and it never gets below freezing here.

    2. Re:In Norway this is a problem by PIBM · · Score: 1

      And have you seen reports of this problem around here ? Which makes it looks like it really is what they say it is..

    3. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because it also fails sometimes doesn't mean it fails the same way.

    4. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the actual problem isn't that the system stops charging (you need to protect your expensive car), but that it doesn't start back up again until a human intervenes. If you went to bed assuming you'd have a full charge in the morning, only to find that it only charged for 10 minutes before shutting off, you'd think that the charger was broken.

      dom

    5. Re:In Norway this is a problem by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      If you went to bed assuming you'd have a full charge in the morning, only to find that it only charged for 10 minutes before shutting off, you'd think that the charger was broken.

      If it only charged for ten minutes before shutting off, the charger is broken.

    6. Re:In Norway this is a problem by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Unless you connected it to a supply that operates outside the design limits. Then if it did anything but shut off, it's broken.

    7. Re:In Norway this is a problem by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Unless you connected it to a supply that operates outside the design limits. Then if it did anything but shut off, it's broken.

      Unless those design limits we set without regard to reality.

    8. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is an actual difference in how the electricity is wired in Norway and Sweden ( I believe this is also the way it is done in the rest of Europe) for 3 phase connections.
      In Sweden we use 4 wires (1,2,3 and neutral) in Norway they only use 3 wires (1,2,3).
      I think this corresponds to the Wye and Delta configurations in Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-phase_electric_power#Three-wire_and_four-wire_circuits )

    9. Re:In Norway this is a problem by TyFoN · · Score: 2

      We have standard european 230V grid.
      I've never had issues with anything using an european plug.
      My guess is the cold. It's been bad lately.

      Another thing is the number of teslas here. I see them _everywhere_.
      With my Toyota I had to pay $25000 as a one time tax, yearly taxes, road tolls, gas at $9/gallon.

      The tesla and other electrics are completely tax free. Not even VAT. No yearly taxes. You pass for free in the toll roads, and electricity is about 16 cents/kWh.
      I could also drive past the traffic in the bus lanes and save one hr compared to driving, 30 mins compared to bus/train.

      I'm seriously considering selling the toyota and getting a tesla, or buying a leaf as a 2nd car.

    10. Re:In Norway this is a problem by EmperorArthur · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's related to the cold, but it also appears to be related to the specific issues of Norway's grid.

      Some speculation is that the problem involves too-extreme fluctuations in the electricity provided by that grid and a charger-side software-mediated shutoff of charging. If that's the case, then this might be another charger issue that can be solved with an over-the-air "patch" like some of the previous problems.

      While this is definitely a concern for Tesla and their Norwegian customers, it doesn't seem to be relevant to cars in North America.

      Well the last patch tried to prevent fires by assuming that if there was too much fluctuation then the contacts were bad.
      My predication is the next anti Tesla story reads "Norway Tesla's more likely to catch fire" or something equally stupid.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    11. Re: In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people in Norway and Sweden actually have 3-phase run to their homes? In the US typically 2-phase is run to homes. A high current device will either be wired up as (1,2, protective ground) or (1,2, neutral, protective ground)

    12. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Confusador · · Score: 1

      Poorly designed != broken.

      Only one of the problems can be fixed by installing a new unit.

    13. Re: In Norway this is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Historically, the typical Norwegian wiring is three-phase with 230V between the phases, local ground, and no neutral; all sockets will connect you to two live phases + protective ground. Running two or three phases to a house wouldn't really change much, so I believe they typically get two live phases (and provide their own ground).

    14. Re:In Norway this is a problem by Zynder · · Score: 1

      You paid 25 THOUSAND dollars as a sales/VAT/use tax! Holy shit! The Toyota probably didn't even cost $25K. How is this absurd tax justified? I think my state, Tennessee, has a roughly 8% sales tax on vehicles. If I paid 25k just in tax, I would have had to pay roughly $315,000 for the car. I don't even believe Toyota makes a vehicle for $300K+ any more. I am hoping, at least for your sake, you meant $2,500 and not 25,000. I feel very very sorry for you if you really did pay $25k.

  14. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by multimediavt · · Score: 2

    I am reminded why most lifeforms has been storing energy chemically, as opposed to electrically, for billions of years.

    Oh, you mean like this? Coming soon to an electric car near you! lol

  15. Were having some trouble adapting them to the cold by Terko · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then we'll have to go out on Tauntauns

  16. Well, that's why Edison won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla was having issues charging.

  17. Biased? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    Nope, no bias in the summary at all. I couldn't possibly imagine anything other than a "just the facts" linked article.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:Biased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying something you don't want to hear is not bias. You Tesla fangirls need to stop gettkng your panties in a knot over any story showing an issue with Tesla.

    2. Re:Biased? by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Actually, the linked article is considerably better. The headline of TFA is more accurate: "Tesla Grapples With Charging-Cable Troubles In Norwegian Cold".

      The article came to prominence via the New York Times, who published that rather scurrilous piece last year on Tesla, but this was a different writer and the Times' summary of it is reasonably neutral.

  18. Sick of Tesla's Positive Spin on Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should be more like the japanese: underpromise and overdeliver!

  19. It's almost as though cars need winterizing by sandbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Weird, eh?

    I used to work in Northern Canada where all the US and some of the European manufacturers used to do cold weather testing. (The toolsets and options differ in North America which is why separate testing was done for Europe.) The Asian manufacturers were also doing cold testing there but their labs and warehouses ended up with all of the crappy real estate.

    Did anyone seriously think the cold wouldn't be an issue? People need to get out of California and see what the rest of the world is like.

    --
    ---- The above post was generated by the Turing Institute. Maybe.
    1. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      As noted in the OP, the issue is not so much the battery tech but the Norway-specific cable that doesn't work. It charges in cold weather in other countries using different cables and it charges in Norway using a third party cable. But first party cable in Norway is apparently dysfunctional in the cold.

      Reason given is that Norway has a different spec for the cable for specific local reasons.

    2. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did anyone seriously think the cold wouldn't be an issue? People need to get out of California and see what the rest of the world is like.

      Merely pointing out that a world exists outside California is enough to blow a fair amount of minds, I'm afraid.

      Even worse, you can extrapolate that to include, "outside 'Murica" for a large portion of the populace.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by PRMan · · Score: 1

      This is even more true in other countries. When I was in New Zealand, I couldn't find a single person that had even been to the other island! Many had never left the area around their major city. Most Californians have at least been to Oregon, Nevada and Arizona. A fair number have been to Mexico (before it got "too dangerous") and about half the middle-class to wealthy families I know have at least flown to Hawaii once.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      This is even more true in other countries. When I was in New Zealand, I couldn't find a single person that had even been to the other island! Many had never left the area around their major city.

      I'm going to try and remember that, the next time some foreign entity starts blathering on about how 'Muricans are unique in our lack of global understanding...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      Merely pointing out that a world exists outside California is enough to blow a fair amount of minds, I'm afraid.

      I see you've met the US Customs agent I had the other day.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    6. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to do in the South Island.

    7. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Same issue with cell phones. Touch screen phones don't work with gloves. This is a serious usability issue for any place that gets significantly cold temperatures. Apparently some Nokia phones have solved this issue. No surprise with a company headquartered in Finland.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    8. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      NZ is so far from any place else that that's not surprising. Australians sometimes call their country Oz, but I've no idea what NZ'ers could use.

    9. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm...

      I suppose as an Aussie I should look for any opportunity to put the boot into our mates across the Tasman...but I feel that I have to stand up for them here. While I can't offer any solid evidence either way, your statement immediately triggers my "that doesn't sound right" sense. I haven't spent a huge amount of time in NZ myself (about a month), but I feel that in their travel habits they are similar to Australians, who are huge travellers (both within Australia and overseas). 70-75% of adult Australians have a passport and they use it too, with roughly a quarter of the population of the country travelling overseas in any given year (unlike the US, Australia has both incoming AND outgoing immigration checks, so we have very accurate statistics on this stuff).

      Now to be clear, I'm not saying that:

      - Your observation isn't true; or

      - That Kiwis are the same as Aussies (culturally or otherwise).

      But something doesn't add up here. The two countries are located in the same area of the world, with similar migrant and historical ties to Europe and other areas of the world. Both have a 'gap year' tradition where overseas travel is almost a rite of passage for kids after finishing school. Both have similar entitlements in terms of annual leave/vacation, long service leave (which IMO is the #1 reason Americans don't travel more - they get much less time off than other OECD nations), etc. So your observation is a bit puzzling.

      However, one thought I did have is that "going to the other island" or going overseas requires a flight in NZ (with the exception of those living close to a car ferry or alternative way of linking the two islands). Californians may have visited OR, NV, AZ and Mexico ... but they can just get in a car and ... go. The middle-class/wealthier families have flown to Hawaii, and I think THAT is the apt comparison as it requires a (comparatively expensive) flight. Car travel is less of a barrier than air travel, even disregarding price. Requires less planning and organisation. Less documentation too. That might explain it to some extent. I wonder what's the percentage of people in CA that have been to HI, versus the percentage of NZers who have been to the other island?

      Anyway yeah ... your anecdote surprises me I have to say. Never thought of NZ as insular at all...

    10. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      No need for a world outside of California, just a world outside of LA and SF. California's Truckee is often one of the coldest places in the country.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      The Southern Alps are beautiful, and some guys seem to have a special fondness for sheep.

    12. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      You can buy gloves that do work with touch screens. (And not just Nokia touch screens either.)

    13. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh bullshit. 1300 Miles from Christchurch to Sidney v.s. 2900 miles on I-80 from San Fransisco to NYC.

    14. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      show a map of the world to a New Zealander and ask him/her to point to Germany on it, do the same to an American, compare, discuss

    15. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Kiwi, I'd like to thank you for standing up for us and not taking the opportunity to put the boot in. I'm not sure I'd have been as noble in your place...

      In terms of travel, you are absolutely correct in saying the Kiwis have similar habits to Aussies. It is definitely a tradition to have a big OE (Overseas Experience) at some point in your life, even if you don't do a gap year. The big thing about going to the other island is that it is often not too far off going to Australia in terms of costs for taking a holiday- a lot of Kiwis will just go on holiday to Australia instead. That has been changing a bit with cheaper airfares becoming a lot easier to get recently.

      I'd say that most Kiwis who have traveled will have visited the other island at some stage - I personally don't know anyone who hasn't been to the South Island at least once, and I live in the North Island. I'd be interested in finding out where PRMan went to in NZ - some smaller towns can be a bit insular (as in any country), but the majority of the population and the larger centres are definitely not.

    16. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      1300 miles and you're in Oz. Nice place, but still Oz. BTW, where's Sidney?

    17. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I've never really bought into the animosity (good-humoured or otherwise) between Australians and New Zealanders. I mean, I just don't get it. When I was in NZ, it seemed at every opportunity, my hosts were jumping to compare things to Australia or make some snarky comment about Australians. As if they think we spend all our time over here thinking we are superior or comparing ourselves to you, or something.

      I'd make "US vs. Canada" comparisons, but it's not really the same: New Zealand and Australia are far more similar than the US and Canada. (I've lived in both - the accents might be similar but the people and ideologies are very different). NZ is the only foreign country I've ever been in (I've been to 20+ countries) that didn't "feel" like a foreign country at all. Wandering around a NZ city feels just like Australia ... same brand names/company names, same 'look and feel' in urban design, hell, even the traffic signals at crossings make that same "slow beep for stop, chirp followed by fast beeping for walk" that I associate with home...

      But the average Aussie doesn't really think about NZ in the same was as many Kiwis seem to regard Australia. I never thought about NZ to a huge extent before I went there ... every now and again, sure, but not to the extent NZ seems to be obsessed with comparisons to Oz. I always just thought of NZ as our very close brothers across the Tasman - the other half of the ANZACs, the only other country to which we extend special reciprocal rights (living here without a visa, access to each others' healthcare systems, etc.) We don't extend any of those courtesies to anyone else, even the Brits and Americans.

      So I was a bit shocked at the fact that a lot (not all, but a lot) of New Zealanders seem to hate the place! Well maybe not hate, but their attitude definitely went beyond a bit of a good-natured ribbing. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't universal, but it was a noticeable theme in my time there (which was on a work assignment for a month, in and around Wellington, NOT a holiday). OTOH I've never heard Aussies say a bad word about NZ (outside of the context of sport, at least).

      Anyway, it's no big deal, and maybe the sense of humour over there is a little different and I'm just a bad judge of what's 'serious' or not. But it certainly caught me off guard, and left a bit of a bitter taste. I always saw NZ as equal and close friends and now ... I dunno, I get the impression that the feelings don't go both ways. A bit of an eye opener. And honestly, I'm not sure what we've done in the past to deserve it.

      Having said that, NZ is a beautiful place and I'll still visit again one day (for a proper holiday, not work). Who knows, might even retire there (hey, I'm a Canberran so I prefer the cooler weather to the blazing heat than infests most of the rest of Australia!).

    18. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by mjwx · · Score: 1

      (unlike the US, Australia has both incoming AND outgoing immigration checks, so we have very accurate statistics on this stuff).

      To be fair, the US has both incoming and outgoing immigration checks. I went through them twice last year.

      With people are giving crap to Californians, the only time I've ever met anyone who knows where Perth (Western Australia) is was a TSA agent who checked my passport on the way out of LAX. He even mentioned Freemantle, I was absolutely flabbergasted that news of Perth's existence had reached outside of Perth.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      For US residents/citizens, there is no outgoing immigration form to fill out, nor a desk you have to line up at and be let through, like in Australia (where you have both the green and yellow forms, one of incoming, one for outgoing).

      Surrendering your I-94 or other temporary document upon leaving the US is not the same as a proper, compulsory immigration check upon departure.

      BTW I'm Australian but live in the US and have done so for the last decade. I travel between the two regularly. So I do have some experience in this area.

    20. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being from New Zealand I thought I would back you up here. I grew up in a small town, I don't know of any one in my class that by the last year year of high school hadn't travelled overseas. But since that is just anecdotal evidence so I went to Statistics New Zealand's Website to get figures, like Australia NZ has immigration counters both coming in and going out which gives very accurate figures. In the year ending November 2013 (the latest figures are available for) there were 2,189,032 short term departures by NZ residents, people going away on trips (the population of New Zealand was approximately 4.47 million), so the average New Zealander leaves the country every second year.

      There is a reason that the New Zealand passport has 48 pages for visas when it only lasts 5 years.

    21. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the stats ... confirms what I thought. Both AU and NZ are big travellers.

      The Aussie passport also has 48 pages but lasts 10 years, interestingly. You can choose to get a double-length 96 page one for a small extra fee though.

    22. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by mjwx · · Score: 1

      For US residents/citizens, there is no outgoing immigration form to fill out, nor a desk you have to line up at and be let through, like in Australia (where you have both the green and yellow forms, one of incoming, one for outgoing).

      Surrendering your I-94 or other temporary document upon leaving the US is not the same as a proper, compulsory immigration check upon departure.

      BTW I'm Australian but live in the US and have done so for the last decade. I travel between the two regularly. So I do have some experience in this area.

      They do still check passports. They're doing an immigration check, just not collecting a outgoing passenger card.

      I didn't have to fill out an outgoing form leaving the US, but still had to submit to a passport check. As for the information that they collect, that was all submitted electronically. If you book a ticket into or out of the United States, the airline is required by law to give all the details of that ticket to the US govt, so they already knew where I was going.

      The Australian govt really needs to take the outgoing passenger card online, it would be great if I could fill it out before going to the airport, link it to my passport and just scan my passport through an autogate (similar to the ones you can use when entering Australia). This would help kill long immigration lines.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by 2sheds · · Score: 1

      Just to back up the surprise, my experience of NZ (as a Brit) is pretty similar to yours, and having spent a fair bit of time in both countries I'd broadly validate your assumption about the similarity of Aussie and Kiwi travel habits. If nothing else, the Interislander between Wellington and Picton works pretty well, it's only 90-odd km on the water and you can pretty much get the train straight through!

      --

      Absit Invidia
    24. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 1

      Norway has a different system for electric power.
      Most countries use what is called TN, where you have one live wire and one neutral.
      Norway uses mostly what is called IT, where you have two live wires and no neutral.
      (some regions of Norway have converted to TN, presumably there is no problem there, but those are also the warmest regions so it may be hard to tell)

    25. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Zynder · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about! There is the entire Middle Earth down there. Go slay some orcs, ride with Rohan, burn some Ents, whatever man. If you can't find anything to do, you've got no imagination! Now excuse me but we are sieging Helms Deep. BRB :D

    26. Re:It's almost as though cars need winterizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, as a New Zealander I wouldn't be surprised if most had never been to the South Island. 80% of the population is in the North Island, 30% in one city. Australia is the most popular travel destination.

  20. Cable issue not Tesla issue by RichMan · · Score: 1

    This is like saying a car is bad because the gas hose does not fit when it gets cold.
    It is not an issue with the car.

    And "dips below zero" would be a poor threshold.
    We have windshield washer fluid that is rated to -50C (-58F) for a good reason.

    1. Re:Cable issue not Tesla issue by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      This is like saying a car is bad because the gas hose does not fit when it gets cold.
      It is not an issue with the car.

      That's like saying that when a 3D game won't run because they rely on driver bugs which don't exist in our driver, it's the game's problem. That might well be true, but everyone using our GPU will blame it on us.

      Similarly, no-one will care whether it's 'the cable's fault' when they're stranded in the middle of nowhere at 40 below zero and unable to recharge their car.

    2. Re:Cable issue not Tesla issue by EvanED · · Score: 1

      This is like saying a car is bad because the gas hose does not fit when it gets cold.

      Yes, if the company that designed and manufactured your car also designed and manufactured the gas hose in a way that was specifically engineered to work with your car. Then it would be like that.

    3. Re:Cable issue not Tesla issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      That's like saying that when a 3D game won't run because they rely on driver bugs which don't exist in our driver, it's the game's problem.

      Sounds accurate. It's NOT good programming practice to rely on undocumented and/or unintentional functionality, and if it was intentional, it would work across drivers (well, excluding incompetent driver programmers and subsequent miss in testing, admittedly).

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  21. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

    All we need is develop a car that runs on fat cells and we can use the liposuction from North Americans (Canadians included) to run the worlds transportation system indefinitely.

  22. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we are shown what a cretin you are.

  23. Re:Who Cares? by DarkOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because many of us are interested. Tesla, love'em or hate'm are trying to sell a pure electric car without the compromises at a price at least a segment of the mass market can afford. There are ton's of technical hurdles to doing that and its interesting to watch theory and design encounter real world conditions.

    Tesla is somewhat unique in this area too, Yes there is all electric Leaf and that strange i-Miev thing but neither of those comes anywhere near offering the range and performance characteristics of what most of us Americans expect from our ICE powered vehicles, in other words they make compromises, where as most Slashdoter's would be quite pleased with the Tesla compared to their current ride, provided it continues to live up to expectations.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  24. OWESOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another product the manufacture didn't bother to actually test in the conditions the average person might expect to use said product.

  25. Meteorologists by necro81 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    apparently meteorologists have just discovered the term Polar Vortex

    No, meteorologists have understood the term Polar Vortex for decades. Weathermen, newscasters, and ratings-minded producers have only just discovered the term.

    1. Re:Meteorologists by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      apparently meteorologists have just discovered the term Polar Vortex

      No, meteorologists have understood the term Polar Vortex for decades. Weathermen, newscasters, and ratings-minded producers have only just discovered the term.

      It gives the MSM a way to explain extreme cold that can be attributed to Global Warming.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    2. Re:Meteorologists by geogob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed. Working with a meteorology research center that has been studying the polar vortex year after year for many decades, I find that remark in TFS quite out of place.

      News meteorologist are quite fond of playing with hype... Just wait until one "figures out" that there is a link between the polar vortex and the ozone hole *gasp*

  26. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they are awesome from a technological standpoint?

    Howso, please? They're brilliantly marketed, but I fail to see how they're technically awesome. What do you consider impressive about them? Be specific.

    And there is a large crossover between computer geeks and people who like cars?

    Disagree. You might as well say, "There's a large crossover between jocks and people who like cars." You know, fast cars, loose women, etc. lol stereotypes.

  27. why is everyone always snide about Tesla? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative

    apparently the darling child of the automotive industry

    What's with the snide side commentary? Tesla isn't the "darling" of anyone. Snide, obnoxious comments like this are pretty much du jour in any coverage. Everyone's gunning for them, simply because they're odd kid on the block.

    A Tesla catches fire after hitting a piece of massive road debris or getiting into a crash, and it's a fucking national emergency, their stock tanks, electric cars are suddenly "unsafe", etc.

    Meanwhile: do you drive a Ford SUV made in the 90's? Twice, Ford weakened the roof and support pillars to save money, against the recommendation of their engineers.

    Drive a 90's Ford? Their ignition switches were substandard and could short out, causing your car to catch fire at random. 8.6 million vehicles: http://articles.baltimoresun.c...

    Drive a recent GM truck? They've also got a "randomly burst into fire" problem; 370,000 vehicles: http://money.cnn.com/2014/01/1...

    Just google "GM recall fire" or "Ford recall fire" and read page after page of recalls that affect hundreds of thousands if not millions of vehicles.

    1. Re:why is everyone always snide about Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And yet, any time something bad happens involving Tesla, hordes of folks like yourself immediately charge to their defense. It sure gives the impression that they're someone's darling, anyway...

    2. Re:why is everyone always snide about Tesla? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Some of us just like fairness.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:why is everyone always snide about Tesla? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you've been paying attention, I'm pretty sure we charge to the defense of anything tech-related that's being pummeled by the press or astroturfers unfairly.

    4. Re:why is everyone always snide about Tesla? by jomama717 · · Score: 1

      Relevant quote from the movie Moneyball:

      ...I know you've taken it in the teeth out there, but the first guy through the wall. It always gets bloody, always. It's the threat of not just the way of doing business, but in their minds it's threatening the game. But really what it's threatening is their livelihoods, it's threatening their jobs, it's threatening the way that they do things. And every time that happens, whether it's the government or a way of doing business or whatever it is, the people are holding the reins, have their hands on the switch. They go bat shit crazy. I mean, anybody who's not building a team right and rebuilding it using your model, they're dinosaurs...

      --
      while [ 1 ]; do echo -n -e "\xe2\x95\xb$((($RANDOM&1)+1))"; done
  28. Cold is Hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My conventional engine pickup won't start when it's cold. Heck, I'm having trouble getting up myself this winter. This old man doesn't really see the issue here.

  29. Cables? by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ...the charging cables that come with the car are unable to provide a charge when the temperature dips below zero.

    Um, Dear Editors (Slashdot and Green Car Reports), The "cables" can't provide a charge?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cables are unable to provide the connection neccessairy to complete the circuit to allow electromagnetic energy to flow. You are picking nits.

      It appears that the connectors are shrinking and not forming a positive connection... based on what little information the article provides (mostly the fact that different connectors do work)

  30. Quick to Blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really tired of these articles popping up before the issue is fully diagnosed. I understand the media's need/want to be the first to break the story, but what story is really here?

    All we know is that the car is possibly having charging problems in an isolated area. With none of the variables worked out, or the root of the problem fully diagnosed, why is the media once again so quick to blame the Tesla?

    1. Re:Quick to Blame by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      I'm really tired of these articles popping up before the issue is fully diagnosed.

      Would you feel the same way if the story was about a problem with Apple or Microsoft gear?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  31. Re:Who Cares? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    provided it continues to live up to expectations.

    What do you mean "continues"?

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  32. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Why is every Tesla fart reported on ./?

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    So its necessary to point out every liability about this new fangled electric car so that buyers put that silly idea out of their head. Besides, big auto will take advertisements in your newspaper, blog site, etc when you have Tesla failure stories. Now double check those jumper cables, then go crank it over while I spray some ether down the intake.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  33. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by ziggyzaggy · · Score: 1

    but batteries depend on a current carrying path from anode to cathode for the "half -cell" reactions take place. Not quite like most living things

  34. Re:Who Cares? by pr0fessor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The name Tesla also holds a special place in geek culture. Choosing that as name for an electric car manufacture puts a greater expectation on the product.

  35. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My car ran out of gas the other day when I was way, way out in the boondocks in freezing Norway. Not a gas station within 100 miles. Is slashdot going to report on that? Oh no, that's not a Tesla, and we're only interested when Tesla cars run out of gas, oops, I mean electricity.

    The question was why is every Tesla _fart_ coming up on slashdot. The news on Tesla, GM, or Edsel really needs to be saved for important issues, and not just someone running out of fscking gasahol.

  36. Fix here break there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am thinking the new Wall Chargers and/or the Software update are causing problems. When it gets cold electrical junction tended to shrink away from each other. The junctions rarely open but instead loose current carrying ability. Normally though this isn't too big a deal because they under go ohmic heating when the current gets high enough. Some Wattage is lost maintaining the temperature at the junction but it's usually very small and self regulating.(More heat causes less resistance in this case making a self regulating loop) I have even see this happen at room temperature where the junction would heat fixing it self. However, Tesla has made it so that charging system checks for bad junctions and if it detects them it ether turns off or charges slowly. Obviously, this prevents the junction from heating up and fixing it self.

  37. Really? by xplosiv · · Score: 4, Informative

    What's next, are we going to post about a gasoline car not starting (am actually trying to help someone jumpstart their ICE right now, maybe I can get featured too)?

    Anyways, just last week, someone made the trip from NYC to LA in his Tesla Model S, seen temps in the -20F range, and the car was just fine. I'm driving my EV in these same temps, no issues either (ignoring the lower range).

    This is not a battery issue as some people seem to indicate.

    1. Re:Really? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Amazing that there aren't any supercharger stations on the I-44/I-40 corridor. I'll bet that would have cut their trip time down significantly.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Really? by xplosiv · · Score: 1

      There should be a station closer to that route by the end of next year. They only finished this east-west corridor very recently, so they have a lot more building to do.

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very interesting to read about that trip. It seems that the only reason they didn't have issues is that the charging stations were close enough together. In the really bad weather they used twice as much energy as they otherwise would (532Wh/mi in MN), getting to charging stations with just a few miles of range left. If I were in a snowstorm in the middle of nowhere with 20 miles to the charger and 40 miles of indicated range, I'd have some pretty bad range anxiety!

      The cold weather also makes charging take much longer, such that at times they may have spent as much time charging as driving.

      I would also note that the direct route is 2800 miles, while the route between charging stations is 3600 miles. A team (one sleeping, one driving) driving an ICE could make the trip in 2 days because stopping for gas only takes an hour a day. This will likely only be possible in an EV with battery swapping.

      dom

    4. Re:Really? by Mryll · · Score: 1

      How much does using the heat trash your mileage when it's that cold?

    5. Re:Really? by xplosiv · · Score: 1

      In 2013, Nissan started offering a heat pump as an option, which has lowered the impact, but it can still make a big dent. I have the system set as 'cool' as possible, but the system still uses around 3.5kW when hitting single digit temps.

      The nice thing about electric cars is that most of them offer heated seats, and in case of the LEAF, even heated steering wheel, so you don't need to use the regular heater as much.

  38. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. They don't generate electricity, they store energy. Learn more Thermodynamics. Additionally: Some batteries store power as EM fields. A high density battery (gang) of capacitors is known as an ultracapacitor, but it's just a battery.

  39. I call bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...on the slightly-different-connector-excuse, and here's why:

    - The voltage is the same (230V@50Hz)
    - The connectors are interchangable (The only difference being the layout of the grounding pins, but support for both are required)
    - If Tesla has supplied adapters that operate differently based on the socket in use (Scandinavia vs (most of) rest of Europe) they are breaching EU regulations (Yes, those regulations cover Norway, despite not being an EU member)

    This is like a paper manufacturer experiencing problems with people using red pens instead of blue on their white cellulose based product.

    As much as i like Tesla and their cars, this explanation is just lame.

    1. Re:I call bullshit by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 5, Informative
      The Norwegian power system is actually very different from the rest of Europe. The three phase system in Europe has 400 V between the phases and 230 V between each phase and the neutral wire which is grounded. Such a system is called a TN system (Terra Neutral).

      Norway, on the other hand, has 230 V between the phases and is completely isolated from the ground. With a perfectly balanced load you can expect ~127 V ground-phase, but the voltage can stray far away from that. This is an IT system (Insulated Terra). The Tesla charging cable is quite picky with the grounding, so it isn't working as it should.

      This has nothing to do with the connectors, which are the same in Norway as in Germany or France.

    2. Re:I call bullshit by skeib · · Score: 1

      While your description of our grid is spot on, you are actually wrong about the connector. Norway _does_ have its own charging connector that's different from the ones shipped in the rest of Europe. Our works everywhere, while the european version does not work in Norway.

    3. Re:I call bullshit by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 1

      By connector I mean the plug that goes into the wall as that is what the post I replied to assumed. This is the same. The UMC, the small box on the charging cable that is not a charger at all, is supposed to be designed specifically for Norway to accept the strange grounding (as in finding 0 V between any wire and ground is a very bad sign!). Obviously, they didn't quite succeed. However, reports from the Norwegian EV-forums seem to indicate that a firmware update of the car itself has solved the problem for most people.

  40. Re:Who Cares? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    It's not a 'starting problem', it's a 'refuelling problem'. I've refuelled my car at 40 below zero before, with no problems.

    And it starts at 30 below zero if I forget to plug the heater in, though it's not very happy about that.

  41. This is why nobody reads the articles by T.E.D. · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd advise Slashdot readers to take their typical tack, and not read the linked articles. They are crap. However (again, much like Slashdot), the comments can be enlightening.

    What I'm seeing there is:

    a) This is not about the cold, or winter at all. Its been a problem since they started delivering vehicles in August.

    b) Due to all the bad press (from poor journalists such as these) over fires from improperly overcharged batteries, Tesla charging cables now try to detect when a battery is fully-charged and stop the charging process.

    c) They do this by looking for changes in the current flow through them.

    d) Norway's power grid is so dirty that it is fooling the cables. That's the issue, near as I can tell.

    1. Re:This is why nobody reads the articles by terjeber · · Score: 2

      d) Norway's power grid is so dirty that it is fooling the cables. That's the issue, near as I can tell.

      Not really, no. The power grid is perfectly "clean" and significantly more stable than in most places in the world. This is solely a wiring problem. Tesla didn't know that the wiring in Norway was slightly different than in the rest of Europe, and they are erroneously detecting ground faults when there are none.

    2. Re:This is why nobody reads the articles by Lucky_Norseman · · Score: 2

      I'd advise Slashdot readers to take their typical tack, and not read the linked articles. They are crap. However (again, much like Slashdot), the comments can be enlightening.

      What I'm seeing there is: .....

      d) Norway's power grid is so dirty that it is fooling the cables. That's the issue, near as I can tell.

      The power grid is not dirty, but uses a different system with no neutral wire and the voltage will therefore be floating with respect to earth. Tesla cables detect this as an earth-fault and disconnect.

    3. Re:This is why nobody reads the articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah... can't we mod you down for spoiling the fun here on Slashdot ?

  42. If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Simonetta · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you live in Norway, stick with proven technology. Like gasoline engines. Let's face it. Norway is often very cold in the winter. Cold enough that people die from cold unless they have machines to keep them warm. When you live in places that have extreme weather, you HAVE to accept that proven working technology like gasoline-engines-for -transportation overrides any emotional feelings of needing to serve as a test site for so-called green technology. In California it doesn't matter. But Norway's not California. If you fuck up and buy a 'green' car that won't start in the cold, then you die in the cold. Act accordingly. Nobody in California gives a shit whether or not you freeze to death because their technology failed.

        This very expensive automobile has demonstratively failed to meet the needs of people who live north of the 55th meridian. Norwegians should not buy it. Buy a Volvo: Swedes understand cold and their cars can be coaxed to start in extremely cold weather.

        And there is this briefly mentioned problem of the fucking Norwegian electrical connectors not mating with standard electric car connectors... You'all need to find the guy responsible for this, strip him to underwear, and dump out into the snow. Be sure to leave him with an electric heater that has a plug that just quite doesn't fit into the socket needed to stay alive. If he lives, then he won't be doing stupid shit like this any more. If he dies, well, just one more soul sacrifice to the Viking gods.

    1. Re: If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you live in Norway?
      Do you have any basis for making recommendations for what Norwegians should do?
      The Tesla actually provides a very good value proposition in Norway because of the way petrol-based cars are taxed (and electrical cars are not). Hence the Tesla being so popular in Norway.
      Also, diesel-based cars can struggle in cold weather. For instance p, whenever I go on a mountain trip in winter in Norway I need to make sure that I fill petrol in the cold part of the country as the diesel being sold there is adjusted to handle the cold, whereas diesel from my hometown probably won't work below minus 15 degC.

    2. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And stick with all the problems that come with using oil too. I would rather not be controlled by the oil cartels.

    3. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'all need to find the guy responsible for this, strip him to underwear, and dump out into the snow.

      Your weird sexual fetishes with frozen corpses aside, you realize that people do that for fun?

    4. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 4, Informative

      My Nissan Leaf works perfectly during the Norwegian winter, and the Tesla owners I know here in Norway are very satisfied with their cars. They have had some charging problems, though. This has nothing to do with the connectors (which are the same as in Germany and France), and everything to do with the strange grounding system used here. In short: Both wires are live, we have 230 V between the phases (all three), and ground is, well, somewhere, who knows really. This is what seems to confuse the Tesla charging cable as it believes it has detected a ground fault and shuts down. As third party charging cables work perfectly, Tesla probably needs to redesign the charging cable in Norway and give a new one to every customer.

      Perhaps you shouldn't give such strong advice on topics you are not that familiar with?

    5. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

      Let's face it. Norway is often very cold in the winter.

      Not particularly cold, given how far north we are due to the Gulf stream and particularly if you live near the coastline - and Norway is a lot of coastline. In the capital, the lowest temp last year was -17.2C, just above 0F, the average in the winter months is just below freezing. True, if I pick one of the coldest cities on the coldest nights it might be -30C, but that's rare.

      If you fuck up and buy a 'green' car that won't start in the cold, then you die in the cold.

      Oh please, it might be a big inconvienience calling a tow truck but nobody's going to die. If you're at home and it won't charge, stay home. If you're at a charging station there will be houses nearby. And if it breaks down in the middle of nowhere on a night with -30C then you're equally screwed as in an ICE car.

      And there is this briefly mentioned problem of the fucking Norwegian electrical connectors not mating with standard electric car connectors...

      Here we're talking about quite regular home connectors, we use the "Schuko" plug used in most of Europe or alternatively the IEC 60309 industrial plugs for faster charging, both very standard in Europe but different than the US. I guess that's what they're talking about since there's few other Teslas on the road in the colder parts of Europe.

      The charging problems mentioned here have by the way been solved in a software patch already, Norwegian papers covered that on last saturday. With charging stations popping up in more and more places, rather abundant and cheap electric power and very nice tax breaks on electric cars I can assure you Tesla will continue to sell well in Norway.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by kbolino · · Score: 1

      This very expensive automobile has demonstratively failed to meet the needs of people who live north of the 55th meridian.

      Nitpick: A meridian is a line of longitude. A line of latitude is called a parallel.

    7. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gothenburg isn't much colder than Detroit, no need to rely on the Swedes.

    8. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, it's Norway. We're (by a huge margin) a net oil exporter, and the largest company is state-owned.

    9. Re:If you live in Norway, stick with proven tech by skeib · · Score: 1

      I live in Norway and I've ordered a Tesla.

      You are wrong on so many levels I don't even know where to start.

      1) Electric cars are a proven technology. Simple as that.

      2) The Tesla works great in the cold. There used to be a charging problem on dirty connections (fixed now!), but that's it. The car works great in -30.

      3) Where I live (Oslo) winter means temperatures hovering between 0 and -10, with very rare dips down towards -20. Using electric cars in the Norwegian climate is a non-problem as long as you do not drive across the entire country on a regular basis. Which very few people do - we fly instead.

  43. Tesla's? by Drew617 · · Score: 1

    So, the company is having trouble charging?

    One Tesla is having trouble charging?

  44. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    most Slashdoter's would be quite pleased with the Tesla compared to their current ride, provided it continues to live up to expectations.

    Its interesting that living up to the expectations is something the Tesla pretty much takes in stride, and all we hear about are the corner cases of Tesla glitches.
    Fires after devastating crashes, charger issues, etc.

    Similar (and worse) problems in ICE vehicles are scarcely mentioned, Gas line freezes, gas tank ruptures, just refusing to start in cold weather.
    There seems to be a media preference for reporting problems, no doubt fueled by all the advertising done by the big auto makers. Of course nobody will admit this, or that advertising influences their story in any way, and yet they will sandwich this news between car ads from 4 or 5 different automakers.

    So geek interest plus big-auto nay-saying to dealership hostility all conspire to make sure you hear every bad thing regardless of how small.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  45. Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

    FTFA: "The issues are simply down to differences in the Norwegian network that Tesla has not experienced elsewhere"

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      FTFA: "The issues are simply down to differences in the Norwegian network that Tesla has not experienced elsewhere"

      So, when my software doesn't work in Norway, I can just say 'the issues are simply down to differences in Norway that we've not experienced elsewhere', and everyone will be happy?

      No, didn't think so.

    2. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your software depended on having a 100Mb/s pipe and they tried to run it over a 500Kb/s DSL line, nobody would be shocked if you announced "We required 100Mb/s and never tested it on a DSL line. As it turns out, it doesn't work correctly. We'll release a patch for that use case shortly." Generally, people will be pretty pleased with that.

      There's more to electricity than "wall outlet" and "battery." As it turns out, the electrical grid in Norway doesn't meet the specs that Tesla designed a safety feature around. It failed safe, and if the owner was paying any attention at all it only produced a slight inconvenience. All told, not a bad showing on Tesla's part.

    3. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No, you'll have to fix the locale specific bug. Just as Tesla will.

      BFD.

    4. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice shill there dude,

      "Apparently the issues are simply down to the differences in the Norwegian network as Norway uses a slightly different charging adapter than other countries in Europe"

      So Tesla supply a slightly different charging adapter and yet according to your logic it's very little to do with them..at all.. again?

    5. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by Confusador · · Score: 1

      Everyone who's not in Norway, yes. You'd be surprised how little care people give to others' problems.

    6. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and that's why Tesla has made a special connector for Norway that handles our crazy grid (it's us and Albania using the same strange standard, chosen because it's cheap and tolerant of earth faults).

      However, the Norway-specific cable did not function 100% before one week ago, when a new software version was pushed out. Now it works perfectly.

    7. Re:Very little to do with Tesla. At all. Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't think at all.

  46. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    Someone haven't driven a diesel in sub zero temperatures without a block-heater.

    The charging issue is a problem but not an unsolvable one. The battery just has to be warmed up before charging.

  47. can't trust these electric cars! by shadowrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    good old gas and diesel cars always work when it's below freezing.

    1. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 2

      Not always, gas and desil cars have had problems over the years requiring multi-viscosity oils (W winter rating), additives to diesel to prevent gelling, batteries with cold crank amp ratings and engine block heaters. Many decades of R+D has help iron out the issues with gas and diesel cars in very cold weather and yet people still have cold morning start issues when the car is no longer in top condition. you could argue instead that with a hundred years of issues we should have stuck with the horse.....

    2. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well not always. at minus 50, minus 60 and beyond? (Siberia, Antarctica)?

    3. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Unless the battery freezes. Diesel isn't that great at -50 either

    4. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should just stay inside when it is below freezing.

      Horses die from exposure too. Gas cars have problems and get horrible mileage, they don't always start either.

    5. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if serious...

      I was traveling during that deep freeze last month. The motel I stayed at was insanely noisy, know why? Because every trucker who stopped nearby left his big diesel truck running all night. I asked why they'd do that. Turns out diesel gels at -30C or so. There's no way in hell that those trucks were going to start again once they'd cooled down.

    6. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by fnj · · Score: 1

      Forgive me for this, but whoosh. I barely avoided the whoosh myself. I bet a lot of readers got whooshed.

    7. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good old gas and diesel cars always work when it's below freezing.

      Gas and diesel engines run in the cold fine as long as they're running. At -40 to -50 C, it only takes 6-8 hours for the oil in the block to freeze, the wet battery to freeze, the fuel in the fuel line to freeze (since E15 gas has more water in it), and even the antifreeze to freeze. Everybody here in the Canadian North has to plugin the vehicle to run the *block*, *battery*, and *cabin* heater. Failure to do so will make your vehicle a popsicle at best, or a hunk of junk because the engine block is cracked.

      SO what's so different about an electric vehicle? Plenty. You charge a EV which will keep the batteries warm and a cabin heater would be simple to install. The batteries themselves, if frozen, will not be damaged. There's no engine block to crack, frost plugs to pop, oil coolers, or fuel lines to freeze/rupture.

      I've lived up north, I'll take an electric vehicle any day....

    8. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That whooshing sound is not a tesla driving past you...

    9. Re: can't trust these electric cars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. We need "funny but in all seriousness" mod :)

    10. Re:can't trust these electric cars! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      At about -40, gasoline won't light in a car engine. If you are in the middle of nowhere with a cold engine, you'll be stuck for a while. Diesel will work better when cold because you don't have a diesel car without a heater inside the chamber.

  48. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    It's not a 'starting problem', it's a 'refuelling problem'. I've refuelled my car at 40 below zero before, with no problems.

    And it starts at 30 below zero if I forget to plug the heater in, though it's not very happy about that.

    Yeah, and I've had gas line freeze at 10 below, 20 minutes after filling the tank, cars that simply refuse to start, fought for head block heater parking spaces at work, etc. Anyone who has lived in cold country who doesn't have a cold weather car horror story doesn't own a car.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  49. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.
     
    Started my ICE at -12f (-24c) today and refueled it enough to go about 400 miles in 3 minutes yesterday at -8f (-22c). No issues either time. My car is 7 years old and has nearly 120k miles on it.
     
      So its necessary to point out every liability about this new fangled electric car so that buyers put that silly idea out of their head.
     
    Just like it's necessary to point out a change in iOS7's icons about a dozen times to give the Apple fanbois something to defend and Fandroids something to mock? Welcome to Slashdot.

  50. Norwegian Issue by smack.addict · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am in the middle of the polar vortex (-13F today) and haven't been having any issues charging my Tesla. I also haven't heard of anyone else in MN having charging issues. This really appears to be a Norwegian issue moreso than a general Tesla + cold issue.

    1. Re:Norwegian Issue by smack.addict · · Score: 2

      As a side note, the battery on my wife's BMW is reporting issues and she's having to leave it running :)

      Gas cars have batteries too!

      Summary: Tesla doing fine in the cold, BMW having issues

    2. Re:Norwegian Issue by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Is Norway like Australia? Do batteries fall up or something there?

    3. Re:Norwegian Issue by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      hmm...

      C = 5 * (F - 32) / 9

      (-13 - 32) = -45
      -45 / 9 = -5
      -5 * 5 = -25

      so -13F = -25 Celsius

      I wish these Americans would start using standard units, rather than the archaic Imperial Units!

    4. Re: Norwegian Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate snide comments about units of measure. One is as good as another. This post is communicating temperatures in MN, where temperatures are measured in F.

    5. Re:Norwegian Issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      How about you guys switch to the metric calendar for awhile and tell us how well that works out for you.

      Metric is not the be-all, end-all. Temperature in colloquial use is easier in Fahrenheit.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    6. Re:Norwegian Issue by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      Metric calendar would be daft!

      I was brought up using the Fahrenheit scale, but I but I now think that in both colloquial & scientific use, Fahrenheit is also daft!

      http://www.straightdope.com/co...
      [...]
      Everybody knows 0 degrees on the Celsius scale is the freezing point of water and 100 degrees is the boiling point. On the Fahrenheit scale, however, freezing is 32 degrees and boiling 212. How on earth were these numbers arrived at? Do 0 and 100 degrees Fahrenheit mean anything?
      [...]

    7. Re:Norwegian Issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Metric calendar would be daft!

      Yes, that was my point.

      Fahrenheit has better granularity for describing temperature ranges IMO. A 10 degree difference in Fahrenheit is only ~5.5 degrees in Celsius.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

      0 Fahrenheit was based on the freezing point of a water-salt mixture, and 96 on the human body temperature, and degree sizes were based on another guy's scale for nice human divisibility (par for the course for U.S. units).

      Do you have any arguments why Celsius is better for colloquial uses? If you were brought up with Fahrenheit, you have the numbers memorized already.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    8. Re:Norwegian Issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Both systems pick arbitrary values for the calibration points; Celsius is just the metric people's hard-on for factors of 10 and trying to force it on everybody else.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    9. Re:Norwegian Issue by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      Even if I know off by heart what the temperatures in Fahrenheit are for the freezing and boiling points for water, it is no reason to inflect that on future generations. Besides, the values (32 & 212) always seemed somewhat strange.

      In colloquial use the size of the unit is no big deal, and if I need to express the temperature in any finer granularity I have no problems with using a decimal point.

      Also the extensive use of Fahrenheit makes it harder or people to understand energy and related concepts in Science. It is also far simpler to have one common system for both science and ordinary use.

      The Americans seems to be moving backwards on Science, looking at the problems in some states pushing Creationism and other superstitions as facts in text books.

    10. Re:Norwegian Issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      In colloquial use the size of the unit is no big deal, and if I need to express the temperature in any finer granularity I have no problems with using a decimal point.

      Well, you're entitled to your opinion, but I'd find having to use a decimal point in that context fundamentally wrong.

      Also the extensive use of Fahrenheit makes it harder or people to understand energy and related concepts in Science. It is also far simpler to have one common system for both science and ordinary use.

      That's not an argument against Fahrenheit per se, but rather against using both. We could switch to Fahrenheit for scientific applications, too :)

      The Americans seems to be moving backwards on Science, looking at the problems in some states pushing Creationism and other superstitions as facts in text books.

      I get the feeling DICE is making this out to be a bigger deal than 90% of the population thinks it is by constantly posting articles about it.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    11. Re:Norwegian Issue by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      I notice that all your arguments involve using both scales or the arbitrariness of their fixed points, which only supports the validity of my opinion that Celsius is only marginally--if at all--superior to Fahrenheit in any objective measure.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    12. Re:Norwegian Issue by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

      Well using 0C and 100C seems more logical than 32F and 212F.

      Also, it would be good for the Americans to join the rest of the world in properly adopting Celsius.

      It is ironic, that it was an American text book (on Physics) in year 12 at school, that did most to convince me of the superiority of the metric system. Mind you, I was not liking the convoluted ways required to work with the Imperial system for some years prior.

    13. Re:Norwegian Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -13F isn't even winter so wtf are you talking about?

      sincerely,
      puzzled Norwegian troll

      P.S. yes really, I'm the genuine article! Feel free to touch me :D

  51. "Norway. Powered by nature." by westlake · · Score: 1

    'below zero' Kelvin?

    Winter

    In winter much of Norway is usually transformed into a snow-clad paradise.

    The lower inland areas, both in the southern and northern parts of Norway, can have very low mean temperatures in winter. Temperatures can reach below -40 F/-40 C in the inner areas of Finnmark, Troms, Trondelag and Eastern Norway, even if this does not happen each winter.

    By contrast, the coastal areas have comparatively mild winters. However, gales, rain and clouds can be frequent and heavy.

    Seasons and climate in Norway

    It doesn't matter whether you measure temperature in degrees Fahrenheit or Centigrade. What matters is whether you can keep your Tesla on the road through a Nordic winter.

    1. Re:"Norway. Powered by nature." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the guy above said, it's typical for batteries to die in very cold weather, so stop coloring this as a failure of the Tesla.

    2. Re:"Norway. Powered by nature." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problems in Norway are not being seen in the US in places which are much, much colder than 32(F). The article actually says the issue seems to be with the charging adapter used in Norway, not the battery itself.

  52. I care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a Chevy Volt at present. This recent cold weather snap has made it MORE expensive to drive around than my 2 year old gas car. It went from 44 miles on a charge to just barely making it to 25. I am interested if the Tesla has a similar reduction in range, and certainly in what else gets effected in the severe cold.

    1. Re:I care by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But is the lower range because the motor uses more electricity at lower temperatures (i.e. more expensive per unit distance?

      Or is it because the battery has a smaller capacity in cold weather. (i.e. same electricity cost per unit distance)

      I suspect the second.

    2. Re:I care by rajanala83 · · Score: 2

      Might also be the electric heating.

    3. Re:I care by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he turned on the heat? There are times when the "inefficiency" of an item becomes a benefit, such as the heat of an ICE when it's stinking cold out, or the heat from incandescent bulbs in the winter (in which case, for those of us with electric heat, they aren't really costing more that a CFL/LED, they're just helping out our heater).

    4. Re:I care by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you're still getting 25 miles before the gas engine comes on, how the heck is it more expensive than any regular gas car on a per-mile basis? The only way that makes any sense is if you're factoring in depreciation, and comparing it to a subcompact economy car that you bought used.

  53. Re:Who Cares? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has lived in cold country who doesn't have a cold weather car horror story doesn't own a car.

    Wow. Apparently I don't own a car. I must have imagined driving it this morning.

  54. Re:Who Cares? by mlts · · Score: 1

    Because they are electric cars that look good, and not the hideous little bubbles that a number of previous electric vehicles looked like.

    Plus, Tesla vehicles are interesting. They have a pickup truck in the works, and being to put together something like that is something no company has even attempted yet. GM has tried to make a hybrid Silverado for a few years, but gave up the effort. If Tesla can pull this off, it would provide a lot of utility, from not having to have a generator on site (just a heavy duty PSW inverter to handle power tools) to max torque at 0 RPM, there are a lot of advantages to an electric pickup.

  55. Offtopic? Really? Time to start metamoderating by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    I complain about the submission author's bias and general bias against Tesla, and you mod it offtopic?

    Time to start meta-moderating more.

  56. Re:Who Cares? by hendrips · · Score: 1

    When I last checked, the lowest priced Tesla available was $80,000 (Tesla's website says $70,000 but that seems to be assuming $10,000 in tax credits). I'm struggling to see how that's affordable to any segment of the "mass market." That's not to knock Tesla - it's an extremely nice, very expensive luxury car. But it is still a very expensive luxury car.

  57. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not reporting on your running out of gas in Norway because it didn't happen.

  58. Tesla's what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Third grade grammar: learn it. Nerds are not supposed to be illiterate.

    1. Re:Tesla's what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla is having problems charging in the cold.

  59. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    Someone haven't driven a diesel in sub zero temperatures without a block-heater.

    Or someone doesn't recognize sarcasm when its cold outside?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  60. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Where did I say that EVERY trip included a horror story?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  61. BS Summary anyway by DarthVain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some example of a guy stuck 100 miles away from a charging station as a result... AWAY.

    If it was a charging issue, then shouldn't he still be at the charging station? If his voltage meter? was indicating the wrong amount, this has nothing to do with the charging station. If it was reading correctly as "low" and he opted to drive 100 miles into the middle of nowhere isn't that the fault of a stupid driver?

    Anyway I think you summarized all the points, but I am still left wondering why (how) that left a man stranded 100 miles from a charging station...

    1. Re:BS Summary anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's obviously a stupid driver. I mean he was dumb enough to buy an electric car in the first place.

    2. Re:BS Summary anyway by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Well, no. Its actually a very good summary of a crappy article (or even more technically, a good summary of an article that is itself a good summary of a third very crappy article). Both the summary and TFA were OK, but the ultimate source was garbage so the result was simply well-communicated garbage.

  62. Re:Who Cares? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    We need a "-1 Whooooosh!" mod.

  63. Re:Who Cares? by EvanED · · Score: 1

    My car ran out of gas the other day when I was way, way out in the boondocks in freezing Norway.

    Because you're dumb and don't know to plan ahead with your gas purchases, while the Tesla is a design or build problem with the car (charger)?

  64. prog paradox by BlazingATrail · · Score: 1

    Going on inside a prog's mind: my environmental car won't charge unless it's warmer, but global warming will fix my car. Mind gets stuck in a paradox loop and head explodes. Rest of the planet returns to normal.

  65. greengrocer's apostrophe by cecom · · Score: 1

    To the editors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
    http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/...

    It is either "Tesla is..." or "Teslas".

    1. Re:greengrocer's apostrophe by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Where I am from,
      "Tesla's having"
      is a perfectly cromulent contraction of
      "Tesla is having".

  66. Yes, but... by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

    "Have you solved the icing problem?"
    - Tony Stark

  67. The anti-Tesla marketing machine is amazing by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Mercedes bursts into flames on the freeway? Doesn't make the news.

    Tesla bursts into flames on the freeway? Front page of Slashdot!

    Chevy won't start when it's minus 40 degrees? "Yup. They do that."

    Tesla won't charge when it's minus 40 degrees? Front page of Slashdot!

    Whatever the shadowy consortium of conventional car dealers is paying you guys, it's worth every penny. Keep it up.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  68. Re:Who Cares? by operagost · · Score: 1

    Well, I've had a car that BARELY started after multiple tries at about 20F because the battery was 5 years old, and I've been stuck in the snow and ice three or four times... does that count? Because I've never had my fuel lines freeze up, even with a 1976 Ford in an upstate NY winter.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  69. Re:Who Cares? by jythie · · Score: 1

    Tesla is kinda at the vanguard of mass market general purpose electric vehicles and people are watching them closely to see how it goes. Are they going to be another failure, or a model of future development? Many are curious and wish to see how it pans out as various highs and lows occur.

  70. You'd have a point if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... you would have stated that the gas pumps were inoperable when you tried filling your tank. This isn't about an end user being a moron who left himself stranded 100 miles from the nearest gas station. It's about an end user left without the expected charge functionality of the car due to the cold. Two decidedly different issues. I'll leave you to guess which one is the actual moron.

  71. Proof that electric cars can never work by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Why is every Tesla fart reported on ./?

    Because there are people who do not want to see non-internal combustion cars succeed. For various reasons.

    And the reason this story is in the news is because internal combustion engines never have problems in cold weather.

    Who do you think pumps more advertising dollars into the media? Companies that are focused on electric cars or companies who primarily make cars that are driven by internal combustion? Do you expect to see more commercials during the Super BowlTM for the Tesla or Chevrolet pickup trucks? And what's the over-under on how many of those Chevy Silverado commercials will be blatantly homoerotic to appeal to the red-blooded, tight jeans and flannel shirt wearing, hairy-chested, gun toting, Red State macho men who want Peyton Manning to bend them over a lay-z-boy and hit the hole in a off-tackle trap to their 2 gap. On one. Omaha.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Proof that electric cars can never work by DarkOx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the reason this story is in the news is because internal combustion engines never have problems in cold weather.

      I don't think most people are unaware or haven't experienced cold weather related problems with traditional ICE powered cars. We also know most of the time (modern cars anyway) they work just fine even in very cold conditions. On the other hand many of us have little or no experience with pure electric cars. So the failure modes and frequencies are in fact interesting whatever they may be, because my guess is at some point many of us will own an all electric car.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Proof that electric cars can never work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the reason this story is in the news is because internal combustion engines never have problems in cold weather.

      You are either ignorant, a liar, or are attempting to convey sarcasm. Those of us in the north have to take precautions with our vehicles because internal combustion engine vehicles do have problems in cold weather.

    3. Re:Proof that electric cars can never work by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Those of us in the north

      I live in Chicago, Illinois, where the outdoor temperature last night was -15 F. Windchill, -40F.

      I had to promise my car that I'd wax it every weekend this summer if she would just start this morning.

      My wife's car, 10 years newer than mine, did not start at all. Heavy snow followed by deep freeze is hell on internal combustion engines that are not kept in a heated garage overnight. I was sarcastically trying to make the point that suddenly these journalists have discovered that cars don't do well in record cold temperatures, but only the electric ones. I don't feel like reading this press release, but I'll bet the story didn't mention that probably 1/3 of the cars in Chicago couldn't start this morning.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Proof that electric cars can never work by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      "We also know most of the time (modern cars anyway) they work just fine even in very cold conditions."

      Modern is the operative word here, its taken 60/70 years of development to get the ICE to the state of reliability. Now everyone is expecting Electric cars to be at that state of development in a very short time. THey are doing a fantastic job considering the development timescale so far, once the battery issue is solved to give a long range of driving then it'll be great.

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  72. Re:Who Cares? by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Because if a Tesla can't charge below 0, then it is useless for most of Europe and North America for most of the winter months.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  73. Re:Who Cares? by OakDragon · · Score: 1

    Slashdot's slogan : "Please scroll down at least half way to read relevant comments"

  74. Re:Who Cares? by jythie · · Score: 1

    Mass market is a fairly relative term, but while 80k is expensive it is still within the range of the upper middle class, so a potential market of millions of families as opposed to tens of thousands. In cars the non-mass market ones would be the custom 'we build your car from scratch when you order' sports cars and such.

  75. Re:Were having some trouble adapting them to the c by operagost · · Score: 1

    Plus you have a nice warm, smelly emergency shelter. Don't forget your lightsaber.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  76. Don't make fun of the POLAR VORTEX by HellCatF6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a must see link for us weather nerds...

    http://earth.nullschool.net/

    make sure to tune into the 10 hPa setting and watch the polar vortex do its thing.

    Thank you supercomputer...

    1. Re:Don't make fun of the POLAR VORTEX by hey! · · Score: 1

      Interesting, but I have no idea what I'm looking at.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  77. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    arcflash: electrical contactors can create blinding plasma when stuck in partially-conducting states

  78. Re: Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, give me a fucking break. Yes, ICEs were hard to start in the cold 30 years ago when most cars had finicky carburetors, weaker ignition systems, and rudimentary electronic controls. I haven't owned a car in the last 20 years that I've ever had to do anything more than turn the key to get it to start, even in -20 degree Fahrenheit or maybe even colder. Modern EFI and advanced computer systems have made "spraying ether down the intake" a quaint historical memory.

    If you really know anything about cars, you're being disingenuous and you know it.

  79. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, they would have gotten away with something like http://gimp.org.

  80. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Well, there is that bit about it being the most popular car sold in Norway in September. So it's not THAT niche.

  81. Re:Were having some trouble adapting them to the c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But your Tauntaun will freeze before you reach the first marker!

  82. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tesla (and battery powered cars in general) being fundamentally broken in cold weather...

    A problem unique to the Tesla charging cables supplied in Norway is not "fundamentally broken" let alone having any significance to battery powered cars in general.

    Tesla just needs to fix the problem and distribute new cables to Norwegian customers. Big fucking deal.

    Methinks you have an axe to grind, and truth isn't important to you.

  83. "In Norway" Headline wrongish --only in Norway by ourcraft · · Score: 1

    n/t

  84. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    I guess you've never seen truck drivers having to start fires under their diesel fuel tanks in order to start when it gets really cold. I have. So you're wrong.

    For sure, these days diesel usually comes with additives appropriate to the region and season to it doesn't usually gel up. This is the nature of engineering, whether in internal combustion vehicles or EVs - over time, engineers mitigate the issues.

  85. From Siberia with love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siberian peoples with local minus 40 Celsius smile and wave. :)

  86. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Sorry, missed the sarcasm on first read.

  87. Re:Who Cares? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    ..and as such, it's being sold to people who are in the market for other cars in that price range (or a little below that range, plus the benefit of no gas, and status of "OMG! Tesla").

    The Nissan Leaf is the poor man's Tesla.

  88. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You just haven't owned it long enough. Anecdotes do take time to accumulate.

  89. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sticking a bunch of heavy, low density batteries into a car and attaching it to a traction motor is not, in any way, "awesome". It's boring, predictable, and rather rubbish.

  90. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop calling the tesla a luxury car. It's nothing more than an over priced loaded camery.

  91. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but he's using am electric grinder in winter.

  92. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Because its firggin obvious no internal combustion engines have starting problems below freezing.

    I guess you've never seen truck drivers having to start fires under their diesel fuel tanks in order to start when it gets really cold. I have. So you're wrong.

    I guess you've never seen sarcasm on the internet.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  93. Re:Whenever I hear about electric car failures by EvanED · · Score: 1

    You're nitpicking.

    For instance, by your argument there's no such thing as an electrical generator at all. For example, those big things in a hydro dam? They don't generate electricity, they merely convert energy.

  94. Oh for fux sake by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 3

    Let's see...Norway has a crappy grid that's giving Teslas problems, it's cold in Norway, so let's title this "Teslas Having Issues Charging in the Cold". Journalistic ethics, how do they work?

    Look, I think Elon Musk is a jerk, I'll probably never own a Tesla, but the Tesla-bashing hype is getting old. And stupid.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    1. Re:Oh for fux sake by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Love to know why you think he's a jerk. He's one one of the most honest, upfront, ambitious, and transparent CEOs I've ever seen. Heck, they're not overcharging double unlike all the other car companies for the Chinese market, because he wants to be fair, even if the Chinese market would happily pay more. He wants us all to pay pennies for mileage instead of pounds for gas, and have almost zero maintenance for our cars instead of hundreds of dollar repair jobs each year.

      His main motive is in fact not money, but switching the world to electric, and (whether global warming is real or not) helping to stop CO2 from wrecking the planet. And he wants to push us towards a base on Mars so we don't die on this rock. He's doing the work of a hundred companies.

      He's the exact OPPOSITE of what you think of him.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    2. Re:Oh for fux sake by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      http://www.marieclaire.com/sex... Sounds kinda jerky. Steve Jobs was a jerk too, but I like a lot of his products. As far as his main motive, I'm curious as to how you think you know what motivates him.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    3. Re:Oh for fux sake by Twinbee · · Score: 1
      Thanks for your reply. I read the whole of that. I never knew of the story, and it made me think a little less of him. But only a little. And the reason why is because throughout the whole of that saga, it seems Elon was so tied to his work he couldn't make much time for his wife. That's very sad, but the good that he's doing for the world is so immense that I would say it takes priority. Personally, when I worked really hard on a certain programming project, I practically ignored everything else including my family. I regret that deeply, but I was getting little sleep, and it was very frustrating what I was working on (as well as being quite addictive). If I could go back in time, I'd force myself to take more breaks.

      Elon gave his old wife an ultimatum, which seemed a bit cold. But I would say that's better than leaving her point blank. She does indeed seem bitter, but not incredibly so. I quote:

      Although I am estranged from Elon — when it comes to the children, I deal with his assistant — I don't regret my marriage. I've worked through some anger, both at Elon for rendering me so disposable, and at myself for buying into a fairy tale when I should have known better. But I will always respect the brilliant and visionary person that he is.

      You said:

      As far as his main motive, I'm curious as to how you think you know what motivates him.

      I've seen countless interviews of him. Lots and lots, so you kinda get to know the way he ticks. For example, when Tesla and SpaceX were dying and very almost went bankrupt, he invested his own personal money to keep them alive (they only just pulled through). He does go on about 'saving the planet' and 'global warming', but he's not 100% sure that we ARE wrecking it, but he thinks it's a good idea not to find out, given that obviously even if there's a 5% chance we are wrecking the planet, it's best not to risk even that small chance.

      He's an engineer as well as a CEO of course. You can hear that technical passion when he talks about SpaceX and Tesla, and making an electric car that has all the advantages of a gas car and then some. His Hyperloop idea was brought about because he thought the plan for a $68 billion bullet train in California was horrendously expensive and less advanced than the Hyperloop (which would come closer to more like $6 billion). He doesn't currently have the time to pursue it because of Tesla and SpaceX, but he's put the whole idea into the public domain in the hopes that someone else will do it.

      And as I said his pricing for the Tesla Model S in China definitely goes against the idea that he's in it for the money too. Supercharger stations (which can get about 100 miles of range in only 15 mins of battery charge) are and will be free of charge to fill up (he uses solar power to help power the superchargers).

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  95. dead batteries and winter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thousands of dead batteries are on old cars that have batteries out of warranty, that will start with just a jump, and can recharge the **old** dead battery enough to run for a while in 5 minutes. This is not a $100K toy who's main selling point is a brand new battery that runs it.

  96. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote] Ok, I'll play. For one thing, Tesla owns its own software stack, rather than kludging together all manner of disparate electronics boxes. They're the only automaker to do so. Their software actually works, as opposed to being metastable. [/quote]

  97. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    I'm not the only one to miss the sarcasm. You might consider the /s tag. Otherwise sarcasm isn't a very good communication strategy on the web. People can't hear the tone of your voice.

    Besides, I already pointed out I missed your sarcasm 18 minutes ago.

  98. Re: Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't owned a car in the last 20 years that I've ever had to do anything more than turn the key to get it to start, even in -20 degree Fahrenheit or maybe even colder.

    Bullshit. My 10 year old car had trouble starting this morning, and even had trouble changing gears. The washer fluid also froze up in the tubes, but that one I'll chalk up to my own stupidity. And this was in friggen Annapolis Maryland! If I had to put up with this weather all the time like they do further north, I'd have to actually get my car modded with heat pads designed specifically to keep certain parts of the car from freezing overnight.

    You either know jackshit about ICE cars and cold weather, or are deliberately trying to spread lies. So which is it?

  99. Re:Who Cares? by Timmmm · · Score: 1

    Are they implying it will be outlandish and impractical?

  100. Re:Who Cares? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

    Where the hell do you drive that your gas line freezes? Diesel can gel, but any sane driver of a diesel vehicle will also put an anti-gelling agent in their tank when the weather turns cold (and I'm sure in the colder of those places there's an anti-gelling compound already mixed in by the distributor to keep the pump from getting stopped up).

    Gasoline, on the other hand, doesn't stop flowing nicely until it's way colder than what your average vehicle will handle... Chances are your water cooling system for the engine will freeze up long before then (even when properly filled with an antifreeze mixture).

  101. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Fairbanks AK ring any bells?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  102. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cut the guy a break. "ICE cars don't have problems in cold weather" is one of the "facts" that electric car FUDers trot out, so it wasn't real clear that you were trying to be sarcastic.

  103. why mom invented metox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oil etc.. addiction

  104. No Apostrophe For Plural by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Teslas

  105. Re:Were having some trouble adapting them to the c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your tauntauns will freeze before you reach the first marker.

  106. the darling child of the automotive industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you mean the darling child of old rich people who never drive further than 50km in any direction? The tesla isn't helping anyone besides tesla.

  107. Re:Who Cares? by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

    Because you're boring and anonymous.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

  108. Re:Who Cares? by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Dicedot page hits.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  109. Re:Who Cares? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Howso, please? They're brilliantly marketed, but I fail to see how they're technically awesome. What do you consider impressive about them? Be specific.

    Are you really that stupid? Please point to any cars which actually compete with them technically, in terms of available horsepower and all-electric driving range.

  110. Easy warm fix by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    Just warm it up by having a battery fire. Easy to do I hear ;-)

  111. Re:Were having some trouble adapting them to the c by ausekilis · · Score: 1

    Then we'll have to go out in Tauntauns

    FTFY

  112. Re:Who Cares? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Gasoline has a very, very low freezing point. The only way you can have gas lines freeze at -10 (any temp) is if you have a bunch of water in your gas.

  113. Re:Who Cares? by nephilimsd · · Score: 1

    Well of course an electric car fails in the cold compared to an ICE powered car. In my experience, ICE is most prevalent in the cold!

  114. Batteries dont like cold - not fatal by mtpaley · · Score: 1

    Batteries don't like the cold. This is inevitable and just physics/chemistry in action. If battery powered cars are going to work in cold conditions then then preheaters of the batteries will be required. For combustion based engines preheaters of the engine block are required but they do at least have the theoretical option of burning fuel to heat the engine upto a usable temperature. This is just something that battery based vehicles are going to have to deal with. If they need to have a feature to dump some power to heat things up then so be it - that is just the way that batteries are going to work but it is not a show stopper - just something that needs to be designed in.

    1. Re:Batteries dont like cold - not fatal by smack.addict · · Score: 1

      It is designed into the Tesla.

    2. Re:Batteries dont like cold - not fatal by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's not a battery failure, combination of Norway's unique electrical grid and the cold temperatures confuses the charging system into thinking there is a problem and it cannot safely charge

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  115. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    Well DUH!

    Come on, for pete sake, this has been known since the 20s.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  116. Re:Who Cares? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    I believe you are referring to pop culture surrounding the name as he is portrayed as a mad scientist.

    In geek culture we think of an electrical engineer at the forefront of his field as it is just starting out.

  117. phone too has problem with cold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after a day outside at -20C, i plug my samsung note 1 and got the message "charging pause, battery too cold"

  118. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In geek culture we think of an electrical engineer at the forefront of his field as it is just starting out.

    It is hard to understate the importance of the man who was the father of the modern electric grid...you know that whole AC thing we use, and the motors, and the generators.

  119. Re:Who Cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    That it will loose it's mind? that it will have followers who make shit up about it?
    If that's true, I expect in a few years here will be claims thew car used to fly and make rainbows until ' they' took it away..

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  120. Why the solution is simple! by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Let's use the battery to heat the system so we can charge it!

    Oh wait...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  121. Re:Who Cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    In nerd culture, we think of him as some one in the for front of his industry and then lost his mind, sadly. We don't shy away from actual facts.

    We also know what he actually did instead of the made up crap spread by ignorant people trying to look cool in their little pop culture and largely fictional universe.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  122. Re:Who Cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It's a design flaw, the gas tank wan't large enough~

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  123. you got it wrong too by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    The cable doesn't know anything about the battery state. The cable is a souped-up extension cord with some protection and detection. The charger in the car does the charging, it knows the battery state. The EVSE (the proper name of this cable) is not supposed to shut off when the current goes down, the charger in the car will take care of that.

    The car has always stopped charging at full, since trickle charging a Li-Ion battery is a great way to put excess wear on it.

    Tesla's EVSE may be cutting off due to power problems. While it may not be Tesla's fault specifically, this would be an issue Tesla has to address.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  124. Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It could be Mr. Tesla who's having problems charging in the cold, probably because he's dead.

    It could be Tesla the company which is having problems charging in the cold. (Tesla's an American company, and American English treats a company name as a singular noun, unlike British English which treats it as a plural noun.)

    It could be that the author meant that Tesla Cars are having issues charging in the cold, and mistakenly pluralized them as "Tesla's" instead of "Teslas".

    It could be that the author meant that the Tesla S is having issues charging in the cold, or that Tesla S Cars are, and really mistakenly punctuated it.

    I'm guessing the third was most likely.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by dwater · · Score: 1

      > I'm guessing the third was most likely.

      Agreed.

      --
      Max.
    2. Re: Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be a contraction for "Tesla is" with a few words left out of the sentence: "Tesla is having issues with their cars charging in the cold"

    3. Re:Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      But it's only a *guess* and you you had to alter the punctuation to get there...

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can bitch about anything can't you?

    5. Re: Multiple Choice's Apostrophe abuse's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In any case, this leads up to an apostrophe catastrophe.

  125. Battery chemistry and safety by Narrowband · · Score: 1

    Depends on battery chemistry. Most electric/hybrid cars seem to be congregating around Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) batteries, which generally shouldn't be charged in the cold... it can cause lithium plating to accumulate on the anodes and if done repeatedly can eventually compromise the safety of the battery packs. Discharging (using) them below freezing is OK, but charging is not.

  126. Re:Who Cares? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    So we can expect Elon Musk to eventually go mad and fall in love with a pigeon?

  127. Re: Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been working on cars, as a hobbyist/shadetree mechanic mind you, for more than 2 decades. The last car I had any real trouble getting to start and run in below-zero temperatures was my 1984 Buick LeSabre with a 4 barrel carburetor. Mind you, I could generally get it to start and run, but not without a slew of attempts at doing so, first. Also, I got it in 1991 with 110k on it, so it wasn't exactly new. It would start and run like a champ once I rebuilt that carburetor. I'm not trying to be a dick, or show you up. I'm just saying that every car I've owned since then has never failed to start on me in the cold short of having a worn-out battery that should have been changed (operator error).
     
    I don't think it's any coincidence that every one of them also has had multi-port EFI, which gives the ECM precise control over the air/fuel mixture to allow it to start and run efficiently, regardless of the ambient temperature. It was actually -18 here this morning, and both my 1995 Toyota with over 250k on the clock, and my 2006 Toyota with 160k both started and ran like the day they drove off the lot. Just sayin'.

  128. Re:Who Cares? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    Norway is a niche in itself, offering subsidies to electric vehicles.

    Contrast that to the eurozone, where sales of said Tesla were about an 1/8 of that in nearby Germany, despite a population 15 times bigger.

  129. Re:Who Cares? by Petfish · · Score: 0

    For whatever reason, Anonymous Coward seems to hate Tesla with a passion.

  130. Re: Already established by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously haven't actually been in one. It is the best car ever made. Pretty straight forward.

  131. Re:Were having some trouble adapting them to the c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just avoid the Tauntaun Model S. It fails to eat at any zero degrees.

  132. Re:Who Cares? by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    This might help once its out in the wild, http://www.theengineer.co.uk/p.... It'll make all vehicles lighter and probably easier to manufacture bring down weight and costs.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  133. In Soviet Russia, you give cars a blowjob! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > in Minnesota every cold snap results in thousands of dead batteries. The number one call out for tow truck companies out here isn't a flat tire but a dead battery.

    Soviet made cars (including Lada, a licenced, modified copy of the italian Fiat 124) are equipped with a hole in the front fender, for hand-crank attachment, to start the engine in battery-killing cold. Their trucks also feature a hand-crankable flywheel and / or a compressed air tank that can rotate the diesel engine until compression-based self ignition starts.

    The famous T-34 battle tank features all three for its 30 liter engine: heavy-duty batteries, comp. air tanks and a hand-crankable flywheel. That's how one was paraded in the streets of Budapest during the 2006 revolution. The batteries and the crank-arm were removed, but a pensioner remembered the beast can also be started via air tank.

  134. Re:Who Cares? by xorsyst · · Score: 1

    No, the Nissan Leaf is the "still rich enough to spend a huge chunk of money on a low-range toy" man's Tesla. There is no poor man's electric car, or even a lower-middle-class man's electric car.

    --
    Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
  135. Re:Who Cares? by jodio · · Score: 1

    Gas lines can freeze when it gets colder (-20C or colder) not because the gasoline freezes but because of condensation in the gas tank. The small amount of water will freeze when it comes in contact with the cold gas line restricting the flow of fuel. This can be avoided by keeping your gas tank full, limiting the amount of condensation.

  136. Re:Who Cares? by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

    If you are going with a conspiracy theory it would be that it had a wireless charging method that worked on free energy no matter where you were all with a battery the size of a double "A". Until of course "they" buried the patents {in some secret classified facility} and slipped Elon something that made him go mad to discredit him and keep him under control. All this because of a secret pact between politicians, the oil, and power industry motivated by profit and world domination.

  137. Re:Who Cares? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    The Leaf is available as a $240 (after tax) lease with fuel costs under $20/mo. It's hardly expensive.

    USA Today tells me the average new car purchase price in 2013 was about $31,200 - about $10k more than a an entry level Nissan Leaf after the tax credit.

    It's hardly a low-range toy.

  138. In love with my IBM PS2 Keyboard by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    I have purchased multiple keyboards over the years, and as the lettering or dirt soils the unit, I replace same. Most of these are not deep dished on the keytops, and have that grating feeling when depressing a key.

    My IBM keyboard with the ps2 plug was borrowed by my grandchild, and the plug was damaged by her, when she tryed to reinsert the plug into the socket.

    Is it possible to just snip off the ps2 plug and put on a USB2 one in its place, or is there a big difference between keyboard electronics manufactured with one or the other?
    My other option, probably what I may do, is open up the keyboard, and replace the full cable. Before I regret taking the wrong action, your advice would be appreciated.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  139. Is the cold no problem for the batteries? by doccus · · Score: 1

    I have similar batteries - LiFePO.. I assumed, because I read it everywhere on the net, that the cold could destroy them, or ast least affect it's ability to contain a charge, so I have delayed replacing my lead acid batteries on my bike because of that. Was that an old wives tale then? Or is that the reason that Teslas use the (potentially) more dangerous Lithium Ion batteries, because they're better in the cold? And please, no snarky comments about how Lithium Ion are "safe" They are, *unless* a spike is driven through them or they are improperly charged, when they can explode.

  140. This should come as no surprise to by Kubla+Kahhhn! · · Score: 1

    ...anyone who has taken a laptop or cellphone on a cold mountain camping trip. But then I read the comments above by those much more learned than me, and I realize I probably don't know what I'm talking about!

  141. Re:Who Cares? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

    Yep - I know a few people there... Not cold enough to freeze gasoline, sorry.

  142. Tesla's Having Issues Charging In the Cold by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

    Tesla's Having Issues Charging In the Cold

    It is, is it?

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  143. Re:Who Cares? by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

    Hmm... Condensation. A few problems with this...

    1) If it's that cold out, why wouldn't the condensation freeze in the tank? I've never seen a heated gas tank...
    2) Most of the really cold places I've seen put 10% ethanol in the gas... this should help dissolve any condensation nicely into the fuel, letting it just run through the system without freezing up.
    3) Really Cold also means Really Dry, which should mean little to no condensation. The condensation happens when warm, moist air hits really cold things or air. Unless someone's making out with their gas tank, there shouldn't be much opportunity for warm, moist air to enter.
    4) Anyone who has a major problem with condensation should consider using additives (methanol/ethanol) to take care of the problem. These are plentiful and cheap - I believe last time I bought the Walmart version I paid $0.50/pint (clearance after winter last year).

  144. Re:Who Cares? by icebike · · Score: 1

    So gas line freeze is a scientific impossibility?

    Hint: for the totally clueless: Water in the gas freezes, blocking fuel. Even a fifth grader understands that.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  145. Re:Who Cares? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Norway is a niche in itself, offering subsidies to electric vehicles.

    Many or possibly most countries in Europe offer EV subsidies and other incentives. As do many US states. So no, that doesn't make Norway a niche.

    Contrast that to the eurozone, where sales of said Tesla were about an 1/8 of that in nearby Germany, despite a population 15 times bigger.

    I'm not sure what you mean, given that Germany is a Eurozone state. Thus the sales in the Eurozone can't be less than the sales in Germany.

  146. Gore, Nobel Prize Winner, No Worries by TheGAGLine · · Score: 1

    In 2008 Gore assured the world that the northern polar ice cap would be gone. Gore also said we will reach the point of no return regarding global warming by 2016. So no worries EV owners, keep believing and your dead cars will be dead no more. As for me, a wool sweater and a car with an Internal combustion engine-

  147. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Leaf is OK for the price but it's seriously range limited. It really is a city car. The iMIEV is a lot better but the cost is painfully close to the Tesla which is in every way a better car for most people.

  148. Re:Who Cares? by jodio · · Score: 1

    1) If it's that cold out, why wouldn't the condensation freeze in the tank? I've never seen a heated gas tank...

    It probably does and won't cause a problem in that case.

    2) Most of the really cold places I've seen put 10% ethanol in the gas... this should help dissolve any condensation nicely into the fuel, letting it just run through the system without freezing up.

    Not always.
    3) Really Cold also means Really Dry, which should mean little to no condensation. The condensation happens when warm, moist air hits really cold things or air. Unless someone's making out with their gas tank, there shouldn't be much opportunity for warm, moist air to enter.

    I Should have been clearer here. I have had it happen to me when the temperature went from -5C to -20C (approx). Plenty of opportunity for condensation to occur.

    4) Anyone who has a major problem with condensation should consider using additives (methanol/ethanol) to take care of the problem. These are plentiful and cheap - I believe last time I bought the Walmart version I paid $0.50/pint (clearance after winter last year).

    Doesn't refute my point that it can occur and when it happened to me it was a rental car

  149. Block heater? by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    It's kinda surprising that there aren't EV equivalents of block heaters to keep the batteries warm and not waste charge warming up the cabin.