Of all the hundreds of games that come out, a generic, free-to-play money grubbing MMO is the one that gets coverage on slashdot? One that really brings nothing interesting or new? And in spite of that gets an extremely positive summary that addresses no flaws?
It's like you think we're too damn stupid to see when content is replaced with ads. Can't you stop insulting our intelligence enough to mark sponsored content? Please?
I have an available online grocery store, but it's a local affair that can't afford decent software for their site, which makes searching/sorting/filtering down to what you want difficult. I can tell it needs a big-money push.
Because when I code, I always want to use a totally unwieldy UI and no text to do it. It's like when we code for robots, how a hobbyist robot you program by directly writing on the embedded chip, using the robot's sensor's as inputs.
How about we code on a machine that's usable for coding? I can still design neat things for my phone that way. I promise.
How could anyone trust an encryption algorithm provided by an organization whose purpose is decryption and interception? That will always be the craziest part.
No, cults tend to have a stronger socio-pathic center that engages in knowing manipulation. Religions tend to have the ability to self-sustain in the absence of the cult leaders. And misusing the word delusion to mean "thing you believe that's untrue" does you no service; it only serves to cloud your statement in rhetoric.
We care when we're treating people, because we're trying to help people appropriately. Thanks for your lack of concern though. I'm genuinely touched by how little you care.
Well, I guess I expect a deeper philosophical examination of such a far-reaching decision than most people are willing to put forth. That makes me a little sad.
Rather than debate a religion I don't believe in's dogma, I'll just say that my CONCLUSION would be that there is plenty of scriptural reason for you to never assume you are capable of judging another person vis-a-vis hell.
"This is not supported by observation" is the premise of your proof by-contradiction(that's what the cool kids are calling sarcasm now) that is flawed. Observing again and seeing things that you lost sight of is a means of (non-absolutely) demonstrating the validity of the belief.
Hey, you find a way to end violence as a means of settling human disputes, and I will commit my life to helping you. Torture has long had a special place as being understood to be unnecessarily cruel.
Slashdot Mirror
Of all the hundreds of games that come out, a generic, free-to-play money grubbing MMO is the one that gets coverage on slashdot? One that really brings nothing interesting or new? And in spite of that gets an extremely positive summary that addresses no flaws?
It's like you think we're too damn stupid to see when content is replaced with ads. Can't you stop insulting our intelligence enough to mark sponsored content? Please?
Like amazon, they're starting in a big west-coast city as an experiment. I'm an eastcoaster.
I have an available online grocery store, but it's a local affair that can't afford decent software for their site, which makes searching/sorting/filtering down to what you want difficult. I can tell it needs a big-money push.
Well, oops.
Rabies isn't a virus. There's your first problem.
Secretly, regular people who live in SI countries don't use or understand Newtons unless they're scientists.
Bayesian analysis of ATMs out versus store register in gives a pretty good model. They don't need to know for sure; they just need a good guess.
Because when I code, I always want to use a totally unwieldy UI and no text to do it. It's like when we code for robots, how a hobbyist robot you program by directly writing on the embedded chip, using the robot's sensor's as inputs.
How about we code on a machine that's usable for coding? I can still design neat things for my phone that way. I promise.
Should gas about half the population.
And it's normal people who are the problem?
How could anyone trust an encryption algorithm provided by an organization whose purpose is decryption and interception? That will always be the craziest part.
Extrajudicial killing is a subset of warfare here. It's not something I approve of, but it's not fucking torture.
Yeah, that's totally why he capitalized internet, and why his post practically sweated contempt.
Because existential judgement allows for an unreasonably taken life to receive "another chance"
Your need to include a metaphor has muddied whatever your point was beyond recognition. What do you mean?
Except that's not normal. That's quite irregular.
Psychology isn't medically diagnostic in nature.
No, cults tend to have a stronger socio-pathic center that engages in knowing manipulation. Religions tend to have the ability to self-sustain in the absence of the cult leaders. And misusing the word delusion to mean "thing you believe that's untrue" does you no service; it only serves to cloud your statement in rhetoric.
That's not a very good way to go about psychiatric care. People often don't have a good sense of their own sanity.
We care when we're treating people, because we're trying to help people appropriately. Thanks for your lack of concern though. I'm genuinely touched by how little you care.
Well, I guess I expect a deeper philosophical examination of such a far-reaching decision than most people are willing to put forth. That makes me a little sad.
Rather than debate a religion I don't believe in's dogma, I'll just say that my CONCLUSION would be that there is plenty of scriptural reason for you to never assume you are capable of judging another person vis-a-vis hell.
"This is not supported by observation" is the premise of your proof by-contradiction(that's what the cool kids are calling sarcasm now) that is flawed. Observing again and seeing things that you lost sight of is a means of (non-absolutely) demonstrating the validity of the belief.
Yeah, too bad republicans didn't let Obama shut that place down. Lindsey Graham is an inhuman monster.
Um... okay... that would be the point you clarify to the poor idiot who clearly didn't understand.
Hey, you find a way to end violence as a means of settling human disputes, and I will commit my life to helping you. Torture has long had a special place as being understood to be unnecessarily cruel.