Yeah, that's because you were a dumb kid who didn't know how to cross a river properly. An adult playing the game to win will have no trouble with anything like that.
"A man has created a work that did not entertain me. Guards, throw him in the dungeon; he clearly is used up. And bring me a baby who has never made a mistake."
Really, doesn't only the "F" part apply to this kind of lazy analysis? It doesn't cast uncertainty or doubt on things in order to reinforce the de-facto standard. Kind of a misapplication.
This is clearly a proposal oriented at earning money from businesses, not changing the world. The deceitful headline doesn't cover the blatant sales pitch in the summary. Which was more than enough to deter me from watching the video.
Amazon is the very definition of very definition of a holder of a stupid Business Method patent. I'm now afraid that reform means what copyright reform meant in 1998.
Well, I blocked slashdot's load of google analytics, which tells me they don't bother to track me themselves(unless it's a false flag). So... it's not that bad.
Also, this would be a good thread to point out that Dice seems to be intentionally collecting user statistics with the latest poll rather than using it as a basis for discussion.
I'm going to be the someone smugly pointing out that they don't use Facebook. But seriously, I can't imagine the payoff of using the site is worth the thousands things they do to track you.
Can I be the asshole that goes "whoosh" today? I can? Yay! Nothing I said there was true. It was what we typically call a "parody" an attempt to represent an over-the-top version of a common view for the purpose of humorously criticizing it.
No, but "guesses" that are basically restatements of a political party's idea of moral rectitude are to be treated with a healthy degree of skepticism.
Oh, I get it now, everything has to be about how one religion is right because another is wrong. The joke centered on the fact that oil is a driving factor of American Foreign policy coupled with a loose stereotype to drive the idea that someone could see this as a good thing.
And stereotypes or cliches are a necessary component of every joke that isn't a pun or using the old "3 repetitions" setup. Otherwise you don't have any expectations to exploit.
There's more that can be done with computing power than just make things shiny.
Only thing I can come up with is AI. And let's be honest, most of the improvements in AI in the last decade have been style and breadth increasing rather than increasing depth of behavior. Neither of those are performance hogs.
I guessed that, but I'm not sure what logical fallacy they even meant to apply to a joke. (Also, I'm not sure why they got modded up for that, but my posts that get modded up are often the ones that really don't deserve it, so whatever)
Slashdot Mirror
*As long as that speech falls into the category of things that benefits the U.S. government.
Yeah, that's because you were a dumb kid who didn't know how to cross a river properly. An adult playing the game to win will have no trouble with anything like that.
"A man has created a work that did not entertain me. Guards, throw him in the dungeon; he clearly is used up. And bring me a baby who has never made a mistake."
FYI: I'd be less lazy, but it's too damn hot and humid.
Really, doesn't only the "F" part apply to this kind of lazy analysis? It doesn't cast uncertainty or doubt on things in order to reinforce the de-facto standard. Kind of a misapplication.
Oh man, I just realized he's been typecast as a sociopath. (dragons are large, fire-breathing sociopaths for all intents and purposes)
Can't this explain the South and the Middle East all in one fell swoop?
Yes it can! But only if you're willing to be intellectually lazy and refuse to acknowledge multi-input systems. Today, I'm feeling exactly that lazy.
Next you'll tell me that sometimes budgets get cut while demands increase.
It's not even that. It's frequently just "having a CRM database".
Yeah, but if they were to lazy to implement their own solution in the first place, why would they?
Essentially. The fact that they go out of their way to disguise what they're doing is really insulting.
This is clearly a proposal oriented at earning money from businesses, not changing the world. The deceitful headline doesn't cover the blatant sales pitch in the summary. Which was more than enough to deter me from watching the video.
You first.
Amazon.com Inc.
Amazon is the very definition of very definition of a holder of a stupid Business Method patent. I'm now afraid that reform means what copyright reform meant in 1998.
I've got to level with you, U.S. propaganda acceptance is at an all-time high.
Well, I blocked slashdot's load of google analytics, which tells me they don't bother to track me themselves(unless it's a false flag). So... it's not that bad.
Also, this would be a good thread to point out that Dice seems to be intentionally collecting user statistics with the latest poll rather than using it as a basis for discussion.
I'm going to be the someone smugly pointing out that they don't use Facebook. But seriously, I can't imagine the payoff of using the site is worth the thousands things they do to track you.
Can I be the asshole that goes "whoosh" today? I can? Yay! Nothing I said there was true. It was what we typically call a "parody" an attempt to represent an over-the-top version of a common view for the purpose of humorously criticizing it.
No, but "guesses" that are basically restatements of a political party's idea of moral rectitude are to be treated with a healthy degree of skepticism.
You're going to have to level with me here. Poe's law or no?
Oh, I get it now, everything has to be about how one religion is right because another is wrong. The joke centered on the fact that oil is a driving factor of American Foreign policy coupled with a loose stereotype to drive the idea that someone could see this as a good thing.
And stereotypes or cliches are a necessary component of every joke that isn't a pun or using the old "3 repetitions" setup. Otherwise you don't have any expectations to exploit.
There's more that can be done with computing power than just make things shiny.
Only thing I can come up with is AI. And let's be honest, most of the improvements in AI in the last decade have been style and breadth increasing rather than increasing depth of behavior. Neither of those are performance hogs.
I guessed that, but I'm not sure what logical fallacy they even meant to apply to a joke. (Also, I'm not sure why they got modded up for that, but my posts that get modded up are often the ones that really don't deserve it, so whatever)
Blocked at my work, so... thanks for that one link reply where the domain trails off before telling me the point of the site.