The minimal interpretation required is that "persons, papers, and affects" would be extrapolated to phone calls if the tech had existed when it was written.
You're right that some people have a stick up their ass regarding the US government, and see conspiracy upon conspiracy in behaviors dominated by realpolitik thinking.
The unique thing about the US is the 4th amendment that prohibits such behavior with only the most minimal of interpretation.
Could always unwind it if something unforseen results.
To play devil's advocate for a position I find distasteful, but haven't yet heard a totally valid takedown of: the neo-liberal set(republicans, libertarians, you know) argue that pragmatically speaking, regulatory laws don't get unwound.
I consider myself insufficiently informed to either debunk or accept that argument, and lack a good tool to find out more.
I used to think adblock was unnecessary back when google was doing the whole "unobtrusive text ad" thing, and I saw a future with hope for ads being reasonable things. But it's been years since that was worth worrying about.
Marketers haven't learned that their obnoxiousness is a tragedy of the commons thing, and upping that factor to compete just quietly hurts the marketplace as a whole.
"Hey jerk, why don't you acknowledge this minor technicality with regard to the subject of why its a bad idea"
I'm not sure that has much bearing at all on the potential legal quagmire they'd be stepping into for the sake of supporting a notion of freedom that's unique to just one country.
Stretch goals: $10,000 Post again. $20,000 Write a book about how I posted $30,000 Exclusive backer-only behind-the-scenes documentary including interviews with all the people worked on the project, like me, and me. You will get so fucking tired of my smug face.
Please back my kickstart project: Get a +5 funny post by ironically mocking the general quality level of "art" projects on kickstarter. Goal $2,000
For $5: you will get my heatfeltfelt thanks(but I won't actually talk to you) For $10: I will let you know when I make the post so you can reply For $20: I will put your name on a website, no one but other backers will ever look at For $50: A T-Shirt with the post-ID image printed on it. For $1000: You can talk to me for a day, because the fact that I ran a kickstarter makes me interesting.
Of course it doesn't include that. One of the quiet realizations of the information age is that more powerful groups are able to leverage any given information better through their ability to acquire new information and tools to parse information rapidly.
The pragmatic reality is that this makes realpolitik the default relationship of government to technology. And it's not clear that are real demand for restraint is going to outweigh the potential leverage all that information gives intelligence workers. For all intents and purposes, it's "too easy" to grab for them to leave it on the table.
No, if you look at the Supreme Court Case [Redacted] vs. [Redacted], you'll find that Justice [Redacted] made the very clear argument that sometimes [Redacted] is necessary because [Redacted]. Honestly, how can you contest that precedent?
And while I respect TJ and the other drafters of the constitution, this was a mistake that didn't account for how badly revolution can go for tyranny instead. Revolution netted us Stalin, Mao, Gaddafi, the Islamic Republic, Bonaparte, and lots of other shitty dictators. It was a novel idea, but it turned out under, more pragmatic inspection, to be a bad idea.
Oh riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. It's me that constantly brings up the socially equalizing force of guns, and not literally every pro-gun organization within the US. Do you have any other completely uninformed insights to share?
Slashdot Mirror
It's just bundling female looking hair attachments in the same set as the scientist clothing minifigs.
Nominally you can get the female hair units by getting princesses or a few other sets that have kind of "specifically" female characters.
They do assert that things that voluntarily pass through the government controlled post office can be inspected, though.
The minimal interpretation required is that "persons, papers, and affects" would be extrapolated to phone calls if the tech had existed when it was written.
You're right that some people have a stick up their ass regarding the US government, and see conspiracy upon conspiracy in behaviors dominated by realpolitik thinking.
The unique thing about the US is the 4th amendment that prohibits such behavior with only the most minimal of interpretation.
Could always unwind it if something unforseen results.
To play devil's advocate for a position I find distasteful, but haven't yet heard a totally valid takedown of: the neo-liberal set(republicans, libertarians, you know) argue that pragmatically speaking, regulatory laws don't get unwound.
I consider myself insufficiently informed to either debunk or accept that argument, and lack a good tool to find out more.
Which is why you always do it running a mutual fund. Dangle other peoples' testicles instead.
Yeah, you communicated your own idiocy quite competently.
Nope. I re-read the argument and can't acknowledge that.
I'm sorry I parodied your absurd complaint.
In simpler terms, you're making an arbitrary and irrelevant distinction.
Nerds are supposed to be self-loathing.
But reddit is a gigantic blight on the internet and and I'm pro-shitting all over them, anytime.
I used to think adblock was unnecessary back when google was doing the whole "unobtrusive text ad" thing, and I saw a future with hope for ads being reasonable things. But it's been years since that was worth worrying about.
Marketers haven't learned that their obnoxiousness is a tragedy of the commons thing, and upping that factor to compete just quietly hurts the marketplace as a whole.
"Hey jerk, why don't you acknowledge this minor technicality with regard to the subject of why its a bad idea"
I'm not sure that has much bearing at all on the potential legal quagmire they'd be stepping into for the sake of supporting a notion of freedom that's unique to just one country.
"Oh woe is me, this website doesn't assume a US monoculture, and many places make the thing I want to sell illegal for quite reasonable reasons"
Let me ask you a question: Do you even know the US's laws regarding exporting weaponry?
Oh, looks like we met our goal.
Stretch goals:
$10,000 Post again.
$20,000 Write a book about how I posted
$30,000 Exclusive backer-only behind-the-scenes documentary including interviews with all the people worked on the project, like me, and me. You will get so fucking tired of my smug face.
Please back my kickstart project: Get a +5 funny post by ironically mocking the general quality level of "art" projects on kickstarter.
Goal $2,000
For $5: you will get my heatfeltfelt thanks(but I won't actually talk to you)
For $10: I will let you know when I make the post so you can reply
For $20: I will put your name on a website, no one but other backers will ever look at
For $50: A T-Shirt with the post-ID image printed on it.
For $1000: You can talk to me for a day, because the fact that I ran a kickstarter makes me interesting.
Of course it doesn't include that. One of the quiet realizations of the information age is that more powerful groups are able to leverage any given information better through their ability to acquire new information and tools to parse information rapidly.
The pragmatic reality is that this makes realpolitik the default relationship of government to technology. And it's not clear that are real demand for restraint is going to outweigh the potential leverage all that information gives intelligence workers. For all intents and purposes, it's "too easy" to grab for them to leave it on the table.
No, if you look at the Supreme Court Case [Redacted] vs. [Redacted], you'll find that Justice [Redacted] made the very clear argument that sometimes [Redacted] is necessary because [Redacted]. Honestly, how can you contest that precedent?
And while I respect TJ and the other drafters of the constitution, this was a mistake that didn't account for how badly revolution can go for tyranny instead. Revolution netted us Stalin, Mao, Gaddafi, the Islamic Republic, Bonaparte, and lots of other shitty dictators. It was a novel idea, but it turned out under, more pragmatic inspection, to be a bad idea.
Yeah, because a little killing is necessary, like a little eating.
Your argument by metaphor totally lacks any crucial flaws that reflect a complete lack of understanding. Good job.
Investment is automation is considered to be a good thing for the long term viability of an economy, usually.
We shouldn't be demanding that our workers live in poverty just to prevent systemic investment.
If your work is delicate or uncertain enough to require human intervention, just use humans. Oh wait, we can't, because we'll die.
Hey, let's hold off on that negativity. Let's talk about the positives here. Like HIV positive, because windows 8 is AIDS.
Their P equivalent is notably nothing like the symbol for pi, though.
Oh riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. It's me that constantly brings up the socially equalizing force of guns, and not literally every pro-gun organization within the US. Do you have any other completely uninformed insights to share?
Oh, you mean an expert in manufacture of firearms? Tell him that expertise is required to manufacture firearms?