Re-read the GP's post. This bug has been fixed. So what do you do if you find a different bug? You submit it to the maintainer of the program, and they'll try to fix it. That is the exact same thing you'd do with a closed source product. As for support contracts, if you want one, you can usually find someone who will sell you one.
Thurgood Marshall flat-out invented the concept of Judicial Interpretation
Judicial Review was an idea that had been discussed some in the Federalist Papers before John Marshall used it in M vs M. It was supported mostly by the Federalists. Part of what made Marshall's solution elegant was that the Anti-Federalists won a round with Marbury's loss, but the Federalists got what they really wanted, Judicial Review.
They could also constitute a Court of Constitutional Intrepretation directly under the Supreme Court, using the power granted in Article I section 8.
I take it you mean I.8.9: "To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court". Yes they can make tribunals, and they can delegate any congressional powers to them, but they would not function as a check on Congress, as they would be appointed by Congress. And such a tribunal would still be under the Supreme Court, so it would not be an improvement.
All this would be pertenent if 321Studios' product had been making straight, byte-for-byte copies of the DVDs. But it did not. To add the screen at the beginning saying that the DVD was a copy and giving the unique ID number, they had to break the encryption on the DVD and then re-encrypt it. That violates the DMCA.
While no USB keyloggers appear to be available online, that does not mean they do not exist. They should not be very complicated to make. An on-screen keyboard is still more secure. Alternatively one could type the letters out of order, and then use the mouse to rearrainge them.
I don't see why someone couldn't make a KeyKatcher-like device that would record both mouse and keyboard events. To combat this, they could have you enter your numbers in a calculator that darts all over the screen...
Knoppix with Mozilla ought to be fine for the software end of things, but the hardware could be compromised too. Someone could have a hardware keylogger such as the KeyKatcher . Building your own computer from scratch is the only way to really be sure. And by "from scratch" I mean from the raw ore.
All the Constitution says about patents or copyright is that "Congress may for a limited time secure to inventors the exclusive right to their inventions". This means that all patent and copyright law, including dispute resolution law, is made by the legislature and so can be changed by them.
If you're average user can't go to the store and buy a program for Linux, they're going to find an OS where they can.
Why do we assume that the average user would rather go to the store and buy the program? The average user now has internet acess and soon will have boadband, and going to the store is a bother. With a distro like Lindos/Linspire with its simplified version of apt-get, you can look at a wider selection of programs in a wider selection of categories than you can in a store, and then get the one you want for free. Updates/upgrades are very simple and can even be scheduled. Buying software at a store is inneficient and outmoded.
The '.' is used in the NetBIOS system to separate the name of the computer from the name of its domain. But this could work most of the time. Does anyone know how IE deals with this?
I seem to remember from Statistics class that the confidence interval of an estimate (aka "margin of error") depends solely on the sample size, and not the population size.
So you are saying that if I conduct some survey and ask 1000 people out of 100,000, my confidence interval is the same as if I ask 1000 people out of 1000? I would expect it to depend roughly on the ratio of the sizes of the sample and the poplation.
I know many might say that employers own the intellectual property that you generate while working for them, but I don't agree. If I develop something innovative whiile working there, it's mine.
Unless your contract says otherwise, any code you write for your employer is theirs under copyright law as a "work for hire". So if you want your innovative work to be yours, you should make sure your contract says so.
If I come up with a solution for a problem am I supposted to forget the solution and never use it again if I go elsewhere?
Unless the company patents the solution, you can use it. You just can't reuse the code. But if you write a reimplementation while having acess to the original code, you might have trouble convincing a court that your new code is not a derived work.
What I don't understand about all of this is how all these piracy apologists here justify downloading by claiming "it's ok because it is open source". It is immoral to copy someone else's work and this tecnical programmer's babble of "proprietary vs free" software is just bunk. When you download Linux you hurt the economy by taking money from Microsoft. When you download the Gimp you hurt Adobe. I'm sick of all these people who think that just because they can write programs they have the right to drive these US Industry Leaders out of business. As I learned in copyright school, downloading is just wrong.
He advises people to use the form to arrainge a more secure method of communication, not to send confidential information with. And while https is moderately secure, I doubt the US and other gov'ts have a very dificult time with it.
I am moved by your plight and would sincerely like to help however I can. Would you please leave your contact information so I know where to to send the money?
To a lot of people, Internet Explorer/is/ the internet. So the e becomes the symbol for the internet. But the goal here should be in part to educate, not decieve, people so perhaps labeling the firefox logo with "Internet" would be best.
As federal air-marshals they are allowed to bring their guns/cannon through security. And a 500mm bullet gives a better chance of hitting the terrorist due to the larger bullet radius.
Slashdot Mirror
Re-read the GP's post. This bug has been fixed. So what do you do if you find a different bug? You submit it to the maintainer of the program, and they'll try to fix it. That is the exact same thing you'd do with a closed source product. As for support contracts, if you want one, you can usually find someone who will sell you one.
Do you work for them?
Judicial Review was an idea that had been discussed some in the Federalist Papers before John Marshall used it in M vs M. It was supported mostly by the Federalists. Part of what made Marshall's solution elegant was that the Anti-Federalists won a round with Marbury's loss, but the Federalists got what they really wanted, Judicial Review.
They could also constitute a Court of Constitutional Intrepretation directly under the Supreme Court, using the power granted in Article I section 8.
I take it you mean I.8.9: "To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court". Yes they can make tribunals, and they can delegate any congressional powers to them, but they would not function as a check on Congress, as they would be appointed by Congress. And such a tribunal would still be under the Supreme Court, so it would not be an improvement.
If the data on the card is at all encrypted, then the DMCA applies and all three of your acts are illegal
All this would be pertenent if 321Studios' product had been making straight, byte-for-byte copies of the DVDs. But it did not. To add the screen at the beginning saying that the DVD was a copy and giving the unique ID number, they had to break the encryption on the DVD and then re-encrypt it. That violates the DMCA.
And then 0 is for ION
whatchya got? Esp HDs & PC2100 184-pin ram
I've found that if you set up both to use software flow control you can get by with only two pins.
While no USB keyloggers appear to be available online, that does not mean they do not exist. They should not be very complicated to make. An on-screen keyboard is still more secure. Alternatively one could type the letters out of order, and then use the mouse to rearrainge them.
I don't see why someone couldn't make a KeyKatcher-like device that would record both mouse and keyboard events. To combat this, they could have you enter your numbers in a calculator that darts all over the screen...
Knoppix with Mozilla ought to be fine for the software end of things, but the hardware could be compromised too. Someone could have a hardware keylogger such as the KeyKatcher . Building your own computer from scratch is the only way to really be sure. And by "from scratch" I mean from the raw ore.
Nope. They are both reserved for testing. example.* and invalid.* are as well.
I don't believe patents are under common law, so patent challenges wouldn't qualify as "Suits at common law".
All the Constitution says about patents or copyright is that "Congress may for a limited time secure to inventors the exclusive right to their inventions". This means that all patent and copyright law, including dispute resolution law, is made by the legislature and so can be changed by them.
Why do we assume that the average user would rather go to the store and buy the program? The average user now has internet acess and soon will have boadband, and going to the store is a bother. With a distro like Lindos/Linspire with its simplified version of apt-get, you can look at a wider selection of programs in a wider selection of categories than you can in a store, and then get the one you want for free. Updates/upgrades are very simple and can even be scheduled. Buying software at a store is inneficient and outmoded.
The '.' is used in the NetBIOS system to separate the name of the computer from the name of its domain. But this could work most of the time. Does anyone know how IE deals with this?
So you are saying that if I conduct some survey and ask 1000 people out of 100,000, my confidence interval is the same as if I ask 1000 people out of 1000? I would expect it to depend roughly on the ratio of the sizes of the sample and the poplation.
Unless your contract says otherwise, any code you write for your employer is theirs under copyright law as a "work for hire". So if you want your innovative work to be yours, you should make sure your contract says so.
If I come up with a solution for a problem am I supposted to forget the solution and never use it again if I go elsewhere?
Unless the company patents the solution, you can use it. You just can't reuse the code. But if you write a reimplementation while having acess to the original code, you might have trouble convincing a court that your new code is not a derived work.
What I don't understand about all of this is how all these piracy apologists here justify downloading by claiming "it's ok because it is open source". It is immoral to copy someone else's work and this tecnical programmer's babble of "proprietary vs free" software is just bunk. When you download Linux you hurt the economy by taking money from Microsoft. When you download the Gimp you hurt Adobe. I'm sick of all these people who think that just because they can write programs they have the right to drive these US Industry Leaders out of business. As I learned in copyright school, downloading is just wrong.
He advises people to use the form to arrainge a more secure method of communication, not to send confidential information with. And while https is moderately secure, I doubt the US and other gov'ts have a very dificult time with it.
I am moved by your plight and would sincerely like to help however I can. Would you please leave your contact information so I know where to to send the money?
-- Clive Bannister
Perhaps this is what you were thinking of? It's not a book, but it has been one of the most useful and practical pieces of writing I've ever read.
To a lot of people, Internet Explorer /is/ the internet. So the e becomes the symbol for the internet. But the goal here should be in part to educate, not decieve, people so perhaps labeling the firefox logo with "Internet" would be best.
Imagine if MS did something like this? We'd all be screaming bloody murder!
As federal air-marshals they are allowed to bring their guns/cannon through security. And a 500mm bullet gives a better chance of hitting the terrorist due to the larger bullet radius.