When a tie happens the House of representaives votes (1 vote per state) to elect the president. If they tie then the Senate chooses a president to serve until the House comes into agreement. I can't remember the details completely, somehow the vice president candidates are involved (perhaps these are chosen to serve temporarily?)
The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote
And from amendment 20:
If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified
As a final note; if you live in the US, be willing to read your constitution.
Vote for 10 of them at The New Voters Project Presidential Youth Debate. You don't even need/. mod points--just a valid email address!"
I don't need no valid email adress; I use Mailinator. You can give the spammers anything and check it on the Mailinator site. Everything's public, though, so avoid confidentials.
I like how it highlights your buddy's names in the buddy list with color codes depending on current messaging status: green if they're currently typing, blue if they've typed something into a window you haven't checked since then, etc.
I agree that it is nice, but Gaim does it was well.
I'm pretty sure that the situation is you pay a maximum of $50 towards bills the thief racked up before you called to cancel, and none towards anything charged after you call in.
(5) "True name and address" means information that accurately identifies the name of the person who is disseminating the commercial recording or audiovisual work, along with his or her valid e-mail or mailing address.
So it looks like you may choose either an email or a mailing address.
An analog signal is nessacary only for the step directly between the machine and us. Everything prior to that step, extending even to the speakers can be made digital and DRM'd. The increased quality of digital signals will push analog devices out of the market, and if MS, the *AA, etc. have their way, digital devices will be locked down with strong encryption-based DRM. So perfect DRM is possible, and by the time it comes analog copying will no longer be possible.
I'm sorry I didn't RTFA (excuse, excuse: their server was overloaded) but now I have and I see that you're right. Point 10 addresses my question exactly.
As an aside, it's not that I was "sitting at [my] computer thinking [I] had foiled this system that a bunch of very smart people invested a ton of time and money in" but that I was confused (obviously) about the way the system worked, and wanted clarification.
My Apple//e shipped with a native resolution of 40 characters. My grandfather had an 80-column addon card, but as the display is a TV-screen, 80 columns was fuzzy. I still use my//e, as a dumb terminal off my linux box.
But the inconsistency with the way you've discribed the system is that it is supposed to be computationally cheap to verify a problem/solution pair. So there would be no benifit to holding onto pairs to use as challenges in the future because it would be both more secure and eficient to generate a new problem every time (to which the anwser is not known, but a solution can be easily verified).
I can't attach it to multiple messages? Whyever not? Imagine I get a token in a message from someone, I attach it to a new message, and send it on to someone else. That is the way reusable tokens are supposed to work, right? But let's say instead that I attach that reusable token to two outgoing messages. Without some central DB of token usage, the recipients can only determine that the tokens I have provided are valid, not that they have not been used for other messages. So this does not prevent spam.
If I recieve a token from someone else, can I copy it and attach it to multiple messages? If so, what's to stop spammers from calculating one token and attaching it to a large number of messages?
Slashdot Mirror
Is to write"
This is not a great soltion, though, as you might as well just write:
The point here is that this was delt with with interfaces, and this isn't where generics help.
Perhaps you might find the 12th amendment illuminating.
From amendment 12:
And from amendment 20:
As a final note; if you live in the US, be willing to read your constitution.
And why not break the anti-counterfitting portion into two separate parts? It can't recognize five dots when the image only has two or three.
I don't need no valid email adress; I use Mailinator. You can give the spammers anything and check it on the Mailinator site. Everything's public, though, so avoid confidentials.
I agree that it is nice, but Gaim does it was well.
You might get even better results if you tried using the video card's outputs.
I'm pretty sure that the situation is you pay a maximum of $50 towards bills the thief racked up before you called to cancel, and none towards anything charged after you call in.
In response to your sig, TANSTAAFL!
re sig: interest (cbr2702 to yahoo d0t com)
Not to be nitpicky, but if he made no modifications to the ffmpeg source then he was not required to distribute it at any point.
The default fonts look nice, though.
I don't see how this is an Anti-bush article. Where would you get that idea?
One could be using Firefox on a corporate intranet for some web-based accounting software, could one not?
Nickel can also be magnetic (though 1/20th the amount of iron). So a nickel might work.
This used to happen in Windows 95/98 too when the color depth was 256.
An analog signal is nessacary only for the step directly between the machine and us. Everything prior to that step, extending even to the speakers can be made digital and DRM'd. The increased quality of digital signals will push analog devices out of the market, and if MS, the *AA, etc. have their way, digital devices will be locked down with strong encryption-based DRM. So perfect DRM is possible, and by the time it comes analog copying will no longer be possible.
</paranoia>
In MA, the RMV charges $25 per road test and $15 per permit test.
How? Everyone knows those Open Sores hippies stole everything anyways.
Sure. $250 for the first and $25,000 for the second.
As an aside, it's not that I was "sitting at [my] computer thinking [I] had foiled this system that a bunch of very smart people invested a ton of time and money in" but that I was confused (obviously) about the way the system worked, and wanted clarification.
My Apple //e shipped with a native resolution of 40 characters. My grandfather had an 80-column addon card, but as the display is a TV-screen, 80 columns was fuzzy. I still use my //e, as a dumb terminal off my linux box.
But the inconsistency with the way you've discribed the system is that it is supposed to be computationally cheap to verify a problem/solution pair. So there would be no benifit to holding onto pairs to use as challenges in the future because it would be both more secure and eficient to generate a new problem every time (to which the anwser is not known, but a solution can be easily verified).
I can't attach it to multiple messages? Whyever not? Imagine I get a token in a message from someone, I attach it to a new message, and send it on to someone else. That is the way reusable tokens are supposed to work, right? But let's say instead that I attach that reusable token to two outgoing messages. Without some central DB of token usage, the recipients can only determine that the tokens I have provided are valid, not that they have not been used for other messages. So this does not prevent spam.
If I recieve a token from someone else, can I copy it and attach it to multiple messages? If so, what's to stop spammers from calculating one token and attaching it to a large number of messages?