Slashdot Mirror


User: dan828

dan828's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
366
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 366

  1. Re:But Remember - on Microsoft's Azure Cloud Suffers Major Downtime · · Score: 1

    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, boy.

  2. Re:Suspicious.. on Microsoft Launches Windows 8 Consumer Preview · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps the set designers for Star Trek consulted some UI people about what UIs would look like in the future? And perhaps the people at MS study some of those same ideas when they were in school?

  3. Re:Possibly too little, too late ... on Microsoft Launches Windows 8 Consumer Preview · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps MS realizes this and figures they've got a good 9 more years to experiment before they need to make a solid desktop OS that'll be adopted by their enterprise customers? I mean, Windows 7 looks like it's going to have all of the staying power that XP did. Perhaps they're thinking they can do some radical experimenting and still maintain their user base with windows 7.

  4. Re:A new kind of copying on Microsoft Launches Windows 8 Consumer Preview · · Score: 0

    Seems a bit off-- first Mac come out in 1984, windows 1.0 was released in 1985. Anyways, they both shamelessly ripped of Xerox, and of course, the work of Doug Engelbart.

  5. Re:I dunno... on Biologists Debunk the "Rotting Y Chromosome" Theory · · Score: 1

    Seems fairly clear that that is what the reporter is saying:


    "After decoding the 25 million years old rhesus macaque, an ancestor to both chimpanzees and humans, the researchers found that the macaque Y contained just 20 genes, just one more that the human Y has lost, and although the human Y chromosome has lengthened and grown significantly longer than the macaque chromosome, the genes were mostly the same. "

  6. Re:I dunno... on Biologists Debunk the "Rotting Y Chromosome" Theory · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think the article is an Amazonian plot. One designed to further degrade basic science education in the world. I mean, it gets some of the basic concepts wrong. I particularly enjoyed the part about the rhesus macaque being ancestral to both humans and chimps. It shows that the person writing the story doesn't have any clue at all about the subject.


    Anyways, the source material is here:

    http://www.nature.com/news/the-human-y-chromosome-is-here-to-stay-1.10082

  7. Re:Steal. on The webOS Features Other OSes Should Steal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sadly, the "they did it too!" defense was struck down by moms everywhere when their children reached the age of 3.

  8. Re:oh the humanity! on Foxconn's Other Dirty Secret: the World's Largest "Internship" Program · · Score: 5, Informative

    You seem to have missed this part: "This isn’t the venerated internship of the privileged college student, building valuable work and life skills with school credit and on-the-job training in place of pay – if such an internship even still exists. Historically, Foxconn’s low-wage internships involve essential factory labor by poor students, some of whose areas of study have nothing to do with electronics, and turn the “school credit” idea on its head. According to SACOM, vocational students, including those studying journalism, tourism and languages, have had practically no choice but to participate in such internships if they want to graduate from their schools. As temporary workers, they have little legal protection or recourse in the event of injury, over-work, or underpayment. And if they complain, they could jeopardize their diplomas."

  9. Re:straight straits on Navy May Use Mine-Detecting Dolphins In the Straight of Hormuz · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never been out to sea.

  10. Re:EULAs on Sony Sued Over PSN 'No Suing' Provision · · Score: 5, Informative

    A EULA, like any other contract, is only enforceable if it's provisions don't break the law. A company can put whatever they want into them, but that doesn't mean it has legal standing. Companies don't get to arbitrarily make laws. They could add a provision that you'll give them your first born son, but I'm pretty sure that wouldn't stand if challenged in court.

  11. Re:Google versus Apple on Google Working On Siri Competitor Majel · · Score: 1

    Well, Niven never did go into detail how the State came into existence.

  12. Re:Google versus Apple on Google Working On Siri Competitor Majel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, I've been seeing Apple as the new MS. That is, blatantly using their big bucks and near monopolistic positioning to crush competition and force major players in various industries to do things their way at the expense of the consumer (eg, the whole e-books thing). I can't even look at the old 1984 commercial without thinking that Apple has become what they despised back then.

  13. Re:They found the farts of God! on Pristine Big Bang Gas Found · · Score: 0

    Well, how to you feel about a religion/philosophy that does none of that, but whose adherents just tend to act like assholes all the time?

  14. Re:Bipartisan support on Bipartisan Internet Sales Tax Bill Introduced · · Score: 1

    Option C: Light a fire under the California attorney general and drag their lying asses into court for monopolistic abuses. As it was, not only did the bastards get off scot-free, they made an outrageous profit.

  15. Re:Bipartisan support on Bipartisan Internet Sales Tax Bill Introduced · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention Grey Davis and his fucked up deal with the energy providers to pay above market prices after they screwed us on those artificial shortages they created. Yeah, Wilson laid the groundwork, but it took a complete moppet like Davis to really fuck it up.

  16. Re:Bing on Official "Firefox With Bing" Released · · Score: 0

    It's called a career in advertising, and I understand it can pay pretty well.

  17. Re:What a dumb idea on US's Most Powerful Nuclear Bomb Being Dismantled · · Score: 1

    You haven't been to a keg party in a while, have you?

  18. Re:What a dumb idea on US's Most Powerful Nuclear Bomb Being Dismantled · · Score: 1

    Oh, I get that it's just name calling at this point, I just think it's a particularly stupid one-- I mean, it's someone that's in the dominant position in a sex act meant to humiliate the one it's being done to. This is supposed to be an insult?

  19. Re:What a dumb idea on US's Most Powerful Nuclear Bomb Being Dismantled · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've never quite gotten why "teabagger" is supposed to be an insult....I mean, you'd be the one doing the teabagging, right?

  20. Re:Skeptical on Facebook: the Law Says You Can't Have Your Data · · Score: 1

    “If the law supposes that,” said Mr. Bumble, “the law is a ass—a idiot." Seems to fit. Apologies to Dickens.

  21. Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    I think you just probably just never noticed it until the repubs where pretty much already in the driver's seat.

  22. Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    Actually, it wasn't. You just never paid attention until it had already been subverted.

  23. Re:What is the goal? on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    unfortunately, at this point they've been almost complete subverted by republican interests.

  24. Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party on Ask Slashdot: How Do You View the Wall Street Protests? · · Score: 1

    Tea party was a populist movement that was subverted by republican interests. It didn't start that way. The Tea Party Express, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the repubs was formed in order to control the news about the tea party, and then given credence by major news organizations. I have no doubt that the dems will pull the same thing. And there are plenty of big money donors on the left to make sure it happens-- see George Soros.

  25. Re:If you can't on Samsung Seeking Ban of iPhone 4S in Europe · · Score: 1

    That's why everyone was pointing out up until now that the fear of this type of tit for tat patent war amounted to the old cold war MAD scenario and thus wouldn't happen. Apparently, Apple didn't get the memo.