I think include files simulate namespaces nicely. Well, as nice as anything in the C language.
Re:Backgrounds of the PHP developers.
on
PHP 5.1.0 Released
·
· Score: 1
You can write perl like that --I do-- but that's really against the Perl culture. Like assuming $_ for many operations. Sure you can state it explicitly but the custom and culture is to assume it. Perl is meant to be written in a 'clever' manner. When I have to write Perl I write it similarily to the way I write my Java code, but that's not really kosher. I once saw code written in Java but in the style of LISP and it was painful. So in summary: writing neat readable Perl code is possible but it is not usingthe language as it was intended to be.
There are no morals beyond self-interest. I think it pretty much follows from there. She also has very 'low' standards of what is required as moral behaviour. While perhaps she doesnt' actually suggest it directly, her ideology condones it.
You can skip the book and head straight to the neurotic wind-bag who wrote it. Ayn Rand and her Objectivism is the cold hearted selfish ideology that inspires NeoCons today (their union with the religious right is self-serving and only mildly ideological)). What is interesting that Alan Greensapn was affiliated with Ayn Rand. Frankly these people are worse than Scientologists.
Who is John Galt? A bloody fucking idiot.
Nice! The confirmation word I had to type is 'satanic'.
I'm afraid that would qualify as sexual haraassment and I bet Google could track your IP. After all it says that your personal details are deleted "shortly"
Over at WikiPedia that have an image of a Blu-Ray disc in a cartridge. That should go a long-ways to prevent scratches. I really felt more comfortable carrying around DVD-RAMs... but unfortunately that format lost out. Hopefully if Blu-Ray wins there will always be a market for cartridged discs, being the same format and prob the same physical disc should go a long ways.
You are assuming there are only two states... rarely thats the case. There are prime numbers and there are composite numbers... and yet there are numbers that are neither (namely one and zero).
I think the language portability is fine. In English it's a little rough around the edges buttry rereading the article as Swahili: much better then. Overall I give it 4/5.
The fact that other compilers can compile the Linux kernel or GCC code is irrelevant. When IE adds another tag or non-standard behaviour it is still "embrace and extend" and proprietary. Now, Firefox adds support for that tag... it's still proprietary. And people on Dillo probably will have more trouble rendering your site than they should.
There are many compilers that don't support these extensions(and you can't fault them for it since they aren't standard). While MSVC might compile them what if I wanted to compile the code while debugging with TinyC(for example) to have a faster turn-around and then only use an effecient one when producing RELASE binaries? Extensions can inhibit that.
To sum with with my opening analogy: a web-page is still proprietary even if another browser can render it if it uses "extensions".
And if you find these points idealistic then remember the context is about "freedom"
Now with that flamebait title I should get some curious readers:D.
The most un-open thinkg about open-source I'd have to say is GCC. It encourages you to use it extensions*. To me one of the core concepts of freedom is portability/being free from vendor lock-in... well GCC does not provide that. IIRC Intel's CC can't compile the Linux kernel... so now you are locked into using GCC. How this is any different from Microsoft's "embrace and extend" I cannot fathom; nor do I assume RMS to have any nobler intentions than Bill Gates from that matter (both insane genius off on self-serving crusades which may accidently benefit others).
What if I'm on a platform not supported by GCC or one for which GCC produces poor binaries or I have special tools for a particular compiler etc?
*(I've read release notes where they begrudged removing an extension when becoming more compliant and there is a comment about not trying to check for ANSIness in the man page)
if you know frank why don't you ask him to post a statement to inform the community or at least make some of templates available on an ftp server for the meantime.
Looking at the site in the http://www.oswd.org/">WaybackMachine it looks like I could have really used that site in the past. Apparently it was a collection of website designs with the HTML/CSS/JS posted. I love doing web-development (especially the back-end XML processing etc) but I'm not the most creative person out there so having a an entire collection of designs I could flip through all in one play wwould be handy for me to slap-together a oook of my own when I need to. I'm book marking that site just incase it comes back. Heres to hoping.
I believe that there is a concurrent garbage collector in Sun's JVM that while not as effecient over-all but runs continously preventing pauses and bubbles associated with traditional garbage collectors.
I'm my Java in a Nutshell 4th Edition (p. 246) one of the java(the interpreter) arguments is:
-Xincgc
Uses incremental garbage collection. In this mode the garbage collector eun continuously in the background, and a running program is rarely if ever, subject to noticeable pauses while gharbage collection occurs. Using this option typically results in A 10% decrease in performance overall, however. Java 1.3 and later.
As this book was written for Java 1.4 I'd bet it was fine-tuned and enhance for 1.5 and even more so for the upcoming 1.6. Might be worth trying out.
They'd get boycotted and it would ruin the marketability of the characters nowadays. I wish I could see them now too... but from a companies perspective it's just not worth it.
And to think I had jsut used my last mod point. *sigh* I definitely agree. AI had moments when you can tell Speilberg blunted what Kubrick would have done. The scene where the android undress I think is the most blatant one. Speilberg stops the undressing... where as I believe Kubrick would have the others carry on and snicker and she would be naked and oblivous and the point would have had much more impact. As for the shining: King makes great books... or at least become great when rewritten by someone else to add depth, The Shining is a prime example.
Frankly I think hopme photo printing is only useful for one-offp prints like long-lost friends dropping by unexpectedly and you grab a group shot with your digi and ant them to have a copy before they leave. Or if you only have one or two photos you want and the extra 80cents is worth the less hassle or if a photo is needed in a hurry. Perhaps it also has some commercial value in theme parks or cruises when you pay for photos.
Frankly I don't ever see home printing being cheaper than store printing since it is by its nature ineffecient since you are duplicating infrastructure instead of sharing the costs of a development machine. Very are the savings supposed to come from?
Slashdot Mirror
I think include files simulate namespaces nicely. Well, as nice as anything in the C language.
You can write perl like that --I do-- but that's really against the Perl culture. Like assuming $_ for many operations. Sure you can state it explicitly but the custom and culture is to assume it. Perl is meant to be written in a 'clever' manner. When I have to write Perl I write it similarily to the way I write my Java code, but that's not really kosher. I once saw code written in Java but in the style of LISP and it was painful. So in summary: writing neat readable Perl code is possible but it is not usingthe language as it was intended to be.
I have read and own a copy of "Capitalism the Unknown Ideal" oh most learned coward.
911 - 4527 feel free to call. Don't worry about area code... you'll get through anyway.
There are no morals beyond self-interest. I think it pretty much follows from there. She also has very 'low' standards of what is required as moral behaviour. While perhaps she doesnt' actually suggest it directly, her ideology condones it.
You can skip the book and head straight to the neurotic wind-bag who wrote it. Ayn Rand and her Objectivism is the cold hearted selfish ideology that inspires NeoCons today (their union with the religious right is self-serving and only mildly ideological)). What is interesting that Alan Greensapn was affiliated with Ayn Rand. Frankly these people are worse than Scientologists.
Who is John Galt? A bloody fucking idiot.
Nice! The confirmation word I had to type is 'satanic'.
I'm afraid that would qualify as sexual haraassment and I bet Google could track your IP. After all it says that your personal details are deleted "shortly"
Heh, I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers this.
i take maybe a half-hour to learn the syntax, but if you name the transition arrows you'll get great graphs. http://www.graphviz.org/
Over at WikiPedia that have an image of a Blu-Ray disc in a cartridge. That should go a long-ways to prevent scratches. I really felt more comfortable carrying around DVD-RAMs ... but unfortunately that format lost out. Hopefully if Blu-Ray wins there will always be a market for cartridged discs, being the same format and prob the same physical disc should go a long ways.
You are assuming there are only two states... rarely thats the case. There are prime numbers and there are composite numbers... and yet there are numbers that are neither (namely one and zero).
The fact that there are losers doesn't mean there are winners.
I think the language portability is fine. In English it's a little rough around the edges buttry rereading the article as Swahili: much better then. Overall I give it 4/5.
The fact that other compilers can compile the Linux kernel or GCC code is irrelevant. When IE adds another tag or non-standard behaviour it is still "embrace and extend" and proprietary. Now, Firefox adds support for that tag... it's still proprietary. And people on Dillo probably will have more trouble rendering your site than they should.
There are many compilers that don't support these extensions(and you can't fault them for it since they aren't standard). While MSVC might compile them what if I wanted to compile the code while debugging with TinyC(for example) to have a faster turn-around and then only use an effecient one when producing RELASE binaries? Extensions can inhibit that.
To sum with with my opening analogy: a web-page is still proprietary even if another browser can render it if it uses "extensions".
And if you find these points idealistic then remember the context is about "freedom"
Now with that flamebait title I should get some curious readers :D.
The most un-open thinkg about open-source I'd have to say is GCC. It encourages you to use it extensions*. To me one of the core concepts of freedom is portability/being free from vendor lock-in... well GCC does not provide that. IIRC Intel's CC can't compile the Linux kernel... so now you are locked into using GCC. How this is any different from Microsoft's "embrace and extend" I cannot fathom; nor do I assume RMS to have any nobler intentions than Bill Gates from that matter (both insane genius off on self-serving crusades which may accidently benefit others).
What if I'm on a platform not supported by GCC or one for which GCC produces poor binaries or I have special tools for a particular compiler etc?
*(I've read release notes where they begrudged removing an extension when becoming more compliant and there is a comment about not trying to check for ANSIness in the man page)
if you know frank why don't you ask him to post a statement to inform the community or at least make some of templates available on an ftp server for the meantime.
Why was this modded funny?
Looking at the site in the http://www.oswd.org/">WaybackMachine it looks like I could have really used that site in the past. Apparently it was a collection of website designs with the HTML/CSS/JS posted. I love doing web-development (especially the back-end XML processing etc) but I'm not the most creative person out there so having a an entire collection of designs I could flip through all in one play wwould be handy for me to slap-together a oook of my own when I need to. I'm book marking that site just incase it comes back. Heres to hoping.
no text
I believe that there is a concurrent garbage collector in Sun's JVM that while not as effecient over-all but runs continously preventing pauses and bubbles associated with traditional garbage collectors.
I'm my Java in a Nutshell 4th Edition (p. 246) one of the java(the interpreter) arguments is:
As this book was written for Java 1.4 I'd bet it was fine-tuned and enhance for 1.5 and even more so for the upcoming 1.6. Might be worth trying out.things never mature till they are released and live in the real world... just like the 2.6 kernel
They'd get boycotted and it would ruin the marketability of the characters nowadays. I wish I could see them now too... but from a companies perspective it's just not worth it.
And to think I had jsut used my last mod point. *sigh* I definitely agree. AI had moments when you can tell Speilberg blunted what Kubrick would have done. The scene where the android undress I think is the most blatant one. Speilberg stops the undressing... where as I believe Kubrick would have the others carry on and snicker and she would be naked and oblivous and the point would have had much more impact. As for the shining: King makes great books... or at least become great when rewritten by someone else to add depth, The Shining is a prime example.
Most ppl don't care about that either. Buisness will but private individuals don't give too shits for the most part.
Frankly I think hopme photo printing is only useful for one-offp prints like long-lost friends dropping by unexpectedly and you grab a group shot with your digi and ant them to have a copy before they leave. Or if you only have one or two photos you want and the extra 80cents is worth the less hassle or if a photo is needed in a hurry. Perhaps it also has some commercial value in theme parks or cruises when you pay for photos.
Frankly I don't ever see home printing being cheaper than store printing since it is by its nature ineffecient since you are duplicating infrastructure instead of sharing the costs of a development machine. Very are the savings supposed to come from?