I noticed just the opposite. I have a website called seamlessvision.net, a web forum board. Searching for "Seamless Vision" on MSN search yields my page as the third result, after two stupid microsoft.com ones. On Google, my site is around 28 or so. The server runs Apache.
Wrong. In VA Beach, I had a knife pulled on me. I called the cops, and was willing to press charges. I later changed my mind, and dropped the charges. The dude also hit me, so it was assault and battery charges.
I just don't think that the reduction in income to the politicians will fix this situation. If anything, they will just borrow more, or scrap useful government projects. How would you suggest fixing the corruption issue?
Perhaps my biggest problem with your plan is that I would be one of the first to go homeless/lose my job. I am already considered below the poverty line, and as the bread winner, cannot agree with your plan. You would rather millions go unemployed, just to take care of excess government spending? What would you do to take them out of office, which is a better idea? If you take them out of office, and somehow write-in provisions curbing government spending/taxes, and abuse of power, that would be ideal.
Cutting out the $ will not kill government corruption, it will just make the powers that be more pissed off.
If Americans start cutting back on spending, jobs will be cut back as well as salaries. Unemployment will rise, and the government will just tax the hell out of those still paying.
The server in question was for a small buisness. It was running SBS 2003. I explained this to the client numerous times that this was not a good idea, to no avail. I don't think a big warning message would have deterred them.
Then they whine about how they can't surf from their server (had a client who I had to disable the "Enhanced Security Configuration" because they couldn't do that).....lose/lose situation I'm afraid.
Apply Windows 2000 Default Internet Explorer Security Settings If Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration is enabled on your server, you may decide to use the default Internet Explorer security settings used by Windows 2000.
To do this, follow these steps: 1. Open Control Panel, click Add or Remove Programs, and then click Add/Remove Windows Components. 2. Select Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration, click to clear the selection, and then click OK. 3. Click Next, and then click Finish. 4. Restart Internet Explorer to apply the changes.
Windows SBS Server 2003 is indeed faster, and requires less RAM than SBS 2000. With SBS 2000, a server needed about a gig and a half with Exchange running on a tiny (10 users or more) network without bombing. With SBS 2003, 512 MB RAM is more than enough, only swapping out about 256 MB. Don't know the logic behind that one, but you can't complain!
If you can't find the licenses, they are not legit. The BSA will not care how they were installed if you don't have those little stickers/pieces of paper.
That would fuck over the economy though, kinda like dropping a nuke as opposed to a precision bomb. Besides, lets face it: not even 1% of Americans would do what you said. And, if the government was getting hard-pressed for cash, they'd just raise taxes to make the people who still paid taxes pay more.
I seriously doubt there is a non-violent solution.
eth0 public IP address
eth0:1 192.168.0.1
It's not really the most secure in the world, but if your client IP is 192.168.0.2, you can route traffic from eth0:1 to eth0. It's kinda a hack, but hey, if it is a controlled environment, it works.
And what can we do about this? Seriously people- what can we do about this? Sending letters to our representatives is a futile effort, at best. Revolution? How would you change the system? I'm serious here folks- email me with your ideas!
Slashdot Mirror
The "western" one is in fact Monty Python themed, it appears.
You don't work as a Guidance Engineer for the Geek Squad- do you?
Best Buy does not give commission to their employees. They are just trying to be helpful...
Makes you wonder, how many cases are still pending? The U.S. judicial process takes quite a bit of time...
I noticed just the opposite. I have a website called seamlessvision.net, a web forum board. Searching for "Seamless Vision" on MSN search yields my page as the third result, after two stupid microsoft.com ones. On Google, my site is around 28 or so. The server runs Apache.
My prediction is that this will turn into a patents war, since I know that MS at least has quite an arsenal stocked up....
Wrong. In VA Beach, I had a knife pulled on me. I called the cops, and was willing to press charges. I later changed my mind, and dropped the charges. The dude also hit me, so it was assault and battery charges.
SPAM= meat in a can
spam= junk email
Don't give SPAM a bad name (not like it had a terribly good one to begin with, but still).
I think he meant jackals.
Because we all know that there is no such thing as a corrupt judge. It's a lot harder to buy off 12 people, vs. 1.
And from the same day, as well. It's an April Fools dupe though!
I just don't think that the reduction in income to the politicians will fix this situation. If anything, they will just borrow more, or scrap useful government projects. How would you suggest fixing the corruption issue?
Perhaps my biggest problem with your plan is that I would be one of the first to go homeless/lose my job. I am already considered below the poverty line, and as the bread winner, cannot agree with your plan. You would rather millions go unemployed, just to take care of excess government spending? What would you do to take them out of office, which is a better idea? If you take them out of office, and somehow write-in provisions curbing government spending/taxes, and abuse of power, that would be ideal.
Cutting out the $ will not kill government corruption, it will just make the powers that be more pissed off.
They want the actual licenses. I had a client audited before, they want the stickers/pieces of paper.
Hate to break it to you....
If Americans start cutting back on spending, jobs will be cut back as well as salaries. Unemployment will rise, and the government will just tax the hell out of those still paying.
The server in question was for a small buisness. It was running SBS 2003. I explained this to the client numerous times that this was not a good idea, to no avail. I don't think a big warning message would have deterred them.
Then they whine about how they can't surf from their server (had a client who I had to disable the "Enhanced Security Configuration" because they couldn't do that).....lose/lose situation I'm afraid.
You can disable it.....
Apply Windows 2000 Default Internet Explorer Security Settings
If Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration is enabled on your server, you may decide to use the default Internet Explorer security settings used by Windows 2000.
To do this, follow these steps:
1. Open Control Panel, click Add or Remove Programs, and then click Add/Remove Windows Components.
2. Select Internet Explorer Enhanced Security Configuration, click to clear the selection, and then click OK.
3. Click Next, and then click Finish.
4. Restart Internet Explorer to apply the changes.
Support for 2K Professional has not been dropped yet:
Clicky
For the impatient, Win2k Pro will be dropped (mainstream support) on June 30, 2005.
Bah, it warned of a "higher security limitation" (i.e. it was locked down), not that it was installed. Troll.
Windows SBS Server 2003 is indeed faster, and requires less RAM than SBS 2000. With SBS 2000, a server needed about a gig and a half with Exchange running on a tiny (10 users or more) network without bombing. With SBS 2003, 512 MB RAM is more than enough, only swapping out about 256 MB. Don't know the logic behind that one, but you can't complain!
If you can't find the licenses, they are not legit. The BSA will not care how they were installed if you don't have those little stickers/pieces of paper.
That would fuck over the economy though, kinda like dropping a nuke as opposed to a precision bomb. Besides, lets face it: not even 1% of Americans would do what you said. And, if the government was getting hard-pressed for cash, they'd just raise taxes to make the people who still paid taxes pay more.
I seriously doubt there is a non-violent solution.
eth0 public IP address eth0:1 192.168.0.1 It's not really the most secure in the world, but if your client IP is 192.168.0.2, you can route traffic from eth0:1 to eth0. It's kinda a hack, but hey, if it is a controlled environment, it works.
And what can we do about this? Seriously people- what can we do about this? Sending letters to our representatives is a futile effort, at best. Revolution? How would you change the system? I'm serious here folks- email me with your ideas!