Rubbish. Religion was removed for them to be despotic authoritarians. Read Marx for pity sake, see what happened in the founding of Mao's China, Lenin and Trotsky's Russia (and the continuation under Stalin), Pot's Cambodia, Castro's Cuba, etc.. etc.. etc.. Those are facts backed in history
You then cherry pick a specific "religion" in the DPRK to argue against the validity of actual facts and history with Judea Christian societies. I can't tell if you are really that much of an idiot, or believe your own bullshit.
Sorry, but I refuse to attempt to argue against someone who repeats the same lie and ignores facts. I gave you the ammunition you need to cure ignorance if you choose. As they say, you can lead a horse to water. Here is a hint: Listening to paid for communist speakers like Nye or Kraus does not make you smart. It makes you a moron.
I said that the "Noble Lie" aspect of Religions is important. Stop inventing statements I never made. If you are not smart enough to understand my premise, ask and learn instead of arguing from ignorance and cherry picking.
Atheistic States have demonstrably more corruption among at all levels and in all aspects of society compared to a Religious society. That corruption is needed for ideologies like communism (and any other deposit authoritarian system) to function.
Religious texts and stories, at least in terms of most Religions in the World are at least historical items dating back at least a couple thousand years. (Yes, even Muslims recognize the Old and New Testaments though they are a bit younger and don't believe the same things.) So it's not "fake news", it's history at a minimum.
Fact facts. Even if you don't recognize a Religion as valid, to deny the "Noble Lie" aspect of most Religions is pretty foolish. Don't murder, don't steal, don't sleep with your neighbors wife, etc.. are all messages and morals resulting in positive society. Bastardizations are an issue, but those issues are much more prevalent in an atheistic society (USSR, China)
In the other part of this thread you said you didn't want debate. Now when someone plays your ad hominem game against you we are supposed to believe you really want a debate? Haha, you are an idiot.
It's all about the social control. You don't have any study at all, so have no facts. I'm not upset at all, I'm pointing out key points in caps since its easier than tagging bold. Of course you don't want a debate, you have 0 facts to debate with. You chose a religion, and argue just like every other cult member we have seen.
People would not poison AI because "F*$& Google", they would poison AI for the same reason we see all sorts of criminal activity. Personal Gain and Money! That means the priority is exactly opposite your odd prioritization. Odd because it does not match crimes in _any_ market of any society.
In terms of AI, there are too many possibilities to contemplate in a/. post. A simple few: Union funded AI corruption to maintain income, worked by people who are interested in corrupting AI to keep a job. White hat hackers who want jobs, black hat hackers who want blackmail money, and grey hat hackers who's NGO funds them to disrupt. That list, as stated above, could go on and on and on.
This is the number 1 problem with most of IT. Despite all evidence pointing to the contrary, many people assume that all use and development is always altruistic. Utopians are buffoons who refuse to learn any history at all, and if people bring it up they deny or play def.
Great book, but not really relevant to this issue. At least not in the way you presented. US companies are subject to the same regulations as VW, so this isn't really favoritism for financial advantage to US companies. What you could say however, is that it pushes along the fall of Europe to fascist communist rule, since the actual people responsible are not facing charges or jail. Those people remain free and wealthy, while the lackey gets jack booted.
False equivalency and appeal to ignorance, followed immediately by another appeal to ignorance. We DO NOT HAVE any long term studies from this artificial meat. The future is definable once we have facts, but you have NONE! There are no long term studies on animals for eating this stuff either. Perhaps you are so stupid you believe that diet has no impact on children, but we have SCIENCE that proves that it does have impact. Here is a very simple product for you to investigate to prove me correct and you an ignorant and inconsiderate prick who is fine with people being harmed by your belief in religion. prenatal vitamins
You then jump right to a false equivalency, and repeat the same appeal to ignorance that can be proven wrong with SCIENCE. How about comparing this meat to a product like Cigarettes, which were advertised for the better part of a century as beneficial to your health. Do you see how ingesting cigarette smoke, or perhaps red dye #5 might be more similar to eating food grown in a lab? Oh, probably not. Your priest class may burn your eyes out for reading such heathen speak.
You follow that brilliance up with a flat out lie. I'll bet you start bragging about your 80 IQ to back that crystal ball reading statement up though. Perhaps you read it in one of your religious pamphlets your masters gave you to worship. I'm sure they told you all about their prophesy that naysayer heathens would speak out against your religion.
You then move to another false claim, and you demonstrate it's falsehood in your second sentence (though you are probably not smart enough to understand that part). Another false claim, and the grand finale is the old appeal to emotion. Your masters surely know what's best for you, no need for self think and all that.
Really there Mister claims to be from science, where are your long term studies of impact from the artificially grown mean? You don't have any, because the "food" has not been around long enough to have any such study! You don't delve into science at all, you practice religion!
If you really "delved" into science you would know about things like Coca-Cola, cigarettes, butt-loads of food dyes, and other processed foods which underwent massive propaganda campaigns like you are attempting to spread all of which proved to be very harmful to people. You are right that science can be used for good or bad, but your religion does not allow you to question which side you are on. You have no facts. Go on back to your grand wizard Gates and suck them salty balls.
We KNOW from this thing called SCIENCE that diet impacts the development of humans. In fact we can see that today because we have people and countries in extreme poverty who have crap diets. We know from evolutionary biology that diet has played a role in our evolution, and have plenty of SCIENCE to back the impact.
I never claimed that this lab meat would cause mysterious illness, you pulled that statement out of your ass because you believe in a religion and rational thought is scary to you.
I said I would wait for the science to see the impact because we lack any such science at this time. You on the other hand believe your deities and religious leaders. Hence your attempt at insinuating that wanting to see real science on the subject is "pseudoscience". Proving that you know a word, but have no clue what it means.
You eat it, we'll wait a few hundred years to see how evolution treats your kids. You never know, they could have the IQ of Socrates and be amazingly athletic. Then again, they could have the IQ and athleticism of a turnip. Why do we have to be your guinea pig?
Science says lots of things are good, and it's not always true. Perhaps try cracking some books and reading history on the subject.
Yeah yeah look eco-authoritarian, when you harvest and clean all of the fruits and vegetables you eat, planting it and harvesting it with tools you made yourself, cooking and canning it over an open fire and wear it's skins while you gather nuts and berries, then come back and act all vegan on us.
That garbage works both ways. I did have the decency to fix your spelling error with "fire" too.
I should have been more direct because TFA says all you need to read.
Should four collisions in the same geographical area be chalked up to coincidence? Could a military vessel be hacked? In essence, what if GPS spoofing or administrative lockout caused personnel to be unaware of any imminent danger or unable to respond? The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) says there's no reason to think it was a cyber-attack, but they're looking into it: "2 clarify Re: possibility of cyber intrusion or sabotage, no indications right now...but review will consider all possibilities," tweeted Adm. John Richardson.
I happen to love good Conspiracy theory. Like the Magic Bullet for JFK, lots of good questions about 9/11. The difference between the good theories and this is that the good ones have facts you need to really think about and chase down.
I find it much more likely that the ship lost power and made a classified distress call, but backup could not get there in time and they didn't want to notify the cargo ship to change course (or made that call way too late).
There's no slope here. If Antifa mutates into an armed thug battalion, something which has never happened,
Well now, your bias is showing. Antifa has caused many millions of dollar in property damage, assaulted thousands of people, yet been given a free pass by democratic politicians.
I get rule of law just fine, you are simply blind to any facts which harm your side. (There are many dozens of examples like Berkley, but you don't care.
Once again proving that you have no interest in actual science and won't listen to experts in subjects like evolutionary biology. You are an anti-intellectual bigot!
A person who lacks any professional training in Psychology or Psychiatry and refuses to read or acknowledge professionals in the field. Fact facts, you are an irrational bigot. You deny science because it may hurt your feelings.
The investigation into "collusion" has been going on for nearly 14 months. Not one charge filed against a single person. At what point would you agree it's a witch hunt, and would that match your perception of a witch hunt against someone on "your" team?
The State is not supposed to "change", confused AC. The State is supposed to be a body established by rule of law. This is why we have a Constitutional Amendment process which we are supposed to use to change the role of the State. Authoritarians can not exist following the rule of Law in the USA. We have this thing called a Separation of powers, which can only be omitted when people start talking about a "living constitution" which is directly opposing "rule of law".
Slashdot Mirror
Rubbish. Religion was removed for them to be despotic authoritarians. Read Marx for pity sake, see what happened in the founding of Mao's China, Lenin and Trotsky's Russia (and the continuation under Stalin), Pot's Cambodia, Castro's Cuba, etc.. etc.. etc.. Those are facts backed in history
You then cherry pick a specific "religion" in the DPRK to argue against the validity of actual facts and history with Judea Christian societies. I can't tell if you are really that much of an idiot, or believe your own bullshit.
Sorry, but I refuse to attempt to argue against someone who repeats the same lie and ignores facts. I gave you the ammunition you need to cure ignorance if you choose. As they say, you can lead a horse to water. Here is a hint: Listening to paid for communist speakers like Nye or Kraus does not make you smart. It makes you a moron.
I said that the "Noble Lie" aspect of Religions is important. Stop inventing statements I never made. If you are not smart enough to understand my premise, ask and learn instead of arguing from ignorance and cherry picking.
Atheistic States have demonstrably more corruption among at all levels and in all aspects of society compared to a Religious society. That corruption is needed for ideologies like communism (and any other deposit authoritarian system) to function.
Bastardizations are an issue, but those issues are much more prevalent in an atheistic society (USSR, China)
Yeah, now show me how great the mentioned countries are in comparison.
Religious texts and stories, at least in terms of most Religions in the World are at least historical items dating back at least a couple thousand years. (Yes, even Muslims recognize the Old and New Testaments though they are a bit younger and don't believe the same things.) So it's not "fake news", it's history at a minimum.
Fact facts. Even if you don't recognize a Religion as valid, to deny the "Noble Lie" aspect of most Religions is pretty foolish. Don't murder, don't steal, don't sleep with your neighbors wife, etc.. are all messages and morals resulting in positive society. Bastardizations are an issue, but those issues are much more prevalent in an atheistic society (USSR, China)
Remove the word talent and we can talk.
In the other part of this thread you said you didn't want debate. Now when someone plays your ad hominem game against you we are supposed to believe you really want a debate? Haha, you are an idiot.
It's all about the social control. You don't have any study at all, so have no facts. I'm not upset at all, I'm pointing out key points in caps since its easier than tagging bold. Of course you don't want a debate, you have 0 facts to debate with. You chose a religion, and argue just like every other cult member we have seen.
People would not poison AI because "F*$& Google", they would poison AI for the same reason we see all sorts of criminal activity. Personal Gain and Money! That means the priority is exactly opposite your odd prioritization. Odd because it does not match crimes in _any_ market of any society.
In terms of AI, there are too many possibilities to contemplate in a /. post. A simple few: Union funded AI corruption to maintain income, worked by people who are interested in corrupting AI to keep a job. White hat hackers who want jobs, black hat hackers who want blackmail money, and grey hat hackers who's NGO funds them to disrupt. That list, as stated above, could go on and on and on.
This is the number 1 problem with most of IT. Despite all evidence pointing to the contrary, many people assume that all use and development is always altruistic. Utopians are buffoons who refuse to learn any history at all, and if people bring it up they deny or play def.
Great book, but not really relevant to this issue. At least not in the way you presented. US companies are subject to the same regulations as VW, so this isn't really favoritism for financial advantage to US companies. What you could say however, is that it pushes along the fall of Europe to fascist communist rule, since the actual people responsible are not facing charges or jail. Those people remain free and wealthy, while the lackey gets jack booted.
False equivalency and appeal to ignorance, followed immediately by another appeal to ignorance. We DO NOT HAVE any long term studies from this artificial meat. The future is definable once we have facts, but you have NONE! There are no long term studies on animals for eating this stuff either. Perhaps you are so stupid you believe that diet has no impact on children, but we have SCIENCE that proves that it does have impact. Here is a very simple product for you to investigate to prove me correct and you an ignorant and inconsiderate prick who is fine with people being harmed by your belief in religion. prenatal vitamins
You then jump right to a false equivalency, and repeat the same appeal to ignorance that can be proven wrong with SCIENCE. How about comparing this meat to a product like Cigarettes, which were advertised for the better part of a century as beneficial to your health. Do you see how ingesting cigarette smoke, or perhaps red dye #5 might be more similar to eating food grown in a lab? Oh, probably not. Your priest class may burn your eyes out for reading such heathen speak.
You follow that brilliance up with a flat out lie. I'll bet you start bragging about your 80 IQ to back that crystal ball reading statement up though. Perhaps you read it in one of your religious pamphlets your masters gave you to worship. I'm sure they told you all about their prophesy that naysayer heathens would speak out against your religion.
You then move to another false claim, and you demonstrate it's falsehood in your second sentence (though you are probably not smart enough to understand that part). Another false claim, and the grand finale is the old appeal to emotion. Your masters surely know what's best for you, no need for self think and all that.
Really there Mister claims to be from science, where are your long term studies of impact from the artificially grown mean? You don't have any, because the "food" has not been around long enough to have any such study! You don't delve into science at all, you practice religion!
If you really "delved" into science you would know about things like Coca-Cola, cigarettes, butt-loads of food dyes, and other processed foods which underwent massive propaganda campaigns like you are attempting to spread all of which proved to be very harmful to people. You are right that science can be used for good or bad, but your religion does not allow you to question which side you are on. You have no facts. Go on back to your grand wizard Gates and suck them salty balls.
Replace it with veganazi, or what ever you prefer. I tried to be a bit more generic since so many people bitch for so many reasons.
We KNOW from this thing called SCIENCE that diet impacts the development of humans. In fact we can see that today because we have people and countries in extreme poverty who have crap diets. We know from evolutionary biology that diet has played a role in our evolution, and have plenty of SCIENCE to back the impact.
I never claimed that this lab meat would cause mysterious illness, you pulled that statement out of your ass because you believe in a religion and rational thought is scary to you.
I said I would wait for the science to see the impact because we lack any such science at this time. You on the other hand believe your deities and religious leaders. Hence your attempt at insinuating that wanting to see real science on the subject is "pseudoscience". Proving that you know a word, but have no clue what it means.
You eat it, we'll wait a few hundred years to see how evolution treats your kids. You never know, they could have the IQ of Socrates and be amazingly athletic. Then again, they could have the IQ and athleticism of a turnip. Why do we have to be your guinea pig?
Science says lots of things are good, and it's not always true. Perhaps try cracking some books and reading history on the subject.
Spam
Yeah yeah look eco-authoritarian, when you harvest and clean all of the fruits and vegetables you eat, planting it and harvesting it with tools you made yourself, cooking and canning it over an open fire and wear it's skins while you gather nuts and berries, then come back and act all vegan on us.
That garbage works both ways. I did have the decency to fix your spelling error with "fire" too.
That is "2SN!!!!111ONE!!!!1!" you insensitive clod!
I should have been more direct because TFA says all you need to read.
Should four collisions in the same geographical area be chalked up to coincidence? Could a military vessel be hacked? In essence, what if GPS spoofing or administrative lockout caused personnel to be unaware of any imminent danger or unable to respond? The Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) says there's no reason to think it was a cyber-attack, but they're looking into it: "2 clarify Re: possibility of cyber intrusion or sabotage, no indications right now...but review will consider all possibilities," tweeted Adm. John Richardson.
I happen to love good Conspiracy theory. Like the Magic Bullet for JFK, lots of good questions about 9/11. The difference between the good theories and this is that the good ones have facts you need to really think about and chase down.
I find it much more likely that the ship lost power and made a classified distress call, but backup could not get there in time and they didn't want to notify the cargo ship to change course (or made that call way too late).
Conspiracy theories activate!
There's no slope here. If Antifa mutates into an armed thug battalion, something which has never happened,
Well now, your bias is showing. Antifa has caused many millions of dollar in property damage, assaulted thousands of people, yet been given a free pass by democratic politicians.
I get rule of law just fine, you are simply blind to any facts which harm your side. (There are many dozens of examples like Berkley, but you don't care.
You are a bigot!
Once again proving that you have no interest in actual science and won't listen to experts in subjects like evolutionary biology. You are an anti-intellectual bigot!
A person who lacks any professional training in Psychology or Psychiatry and refuses to read or acknowledge professionals in the field. Fact facts, you are an irrational bigot. You deny science because it may hurt your feelings.
The investigation into "collusion" has been going on for nearly 14 months. Not one charge filed against a single person. At what point would you agree it's a witch hunt, and would that match your perception of a witch hunt against someone on "your" team?
The State is not supposed to "change", confused AC. The State is supposed to be a body established by rule of law. This is why we have a Constitutional Amendment process which we are supposed to use to change the role of the State. Authoritarians can not exist following the rule of Law in the USA. We have this thing called a Separation of powers, which can only be omitted when people start talking about a "living constitution" which is directly opposing "rule of law".
You are defending a kill switch because you agree with it's use. This time... Shame on you!