Once again, you speak from a position of authority which is completely devoid of evidence. How many people are currently using self-driving cars without the ability to operate a vehicle? How many of those same people have been involved in accidents?
Can you provide an argument without inventing fantasy arguments with no basis in reality? Yeah, I thought so.
So your supposition is that the only people involved in accidents have been 80 year old women? How about some numbers which demonstrate that even a single innocent 80 year old male or female have been the victims of accidents in self-driving cars? The extreme absurdity of your point makes it clear that you don't wish to have rational dialogue on the subject. Many (not to be confused with most) accidents have been DRIVER error, not computer error. This would back my original statement which you seem to grasp but lose in your "poor old lady" appeal to emotion.
I learned long ago that I cannot prove anything on the Internet.
Then perhaps you should consider that your knowledge and opinion are not well founded. I demonstrated here that there are no right wing groups attempting to squash first amendment rights with violence, and you have not been able to refute that point. In fact you simply dropped it because you can't provide any such evidence so realize your opinion is based on delusion. I gave the correct scientific answer to gender and sex, to which you make another false claim about perception meaning more than facts.
I'd agree that I can't make you provide or listen to facts, but that has nothing to do with Internet. That is your failure to adhere to logic and reason. Those same short comings are found all over, and I have no problem pointing out those failures when I see them. I further don't bend my own opinions based on "feels" over facts.
People buy the cars knowing what they are getting, so the majority of the insurance should be on the consumer. However, there should be a split between Manufacturer and Consumer in the case of a defect. For now at least, self-driving an option on a car and not a mandatory feature. I think there are numerous legal challenges, especially if the option becomes mandatory for any reason.
This will probably slow manufacturing of self driving cars. Cost will translate into massive fees on cars and "maintenance", which means people won't buy them. Government subsidies are just a way of waving hands and moving the fees to all tax payers instead of consumers.
Hey man, it's the Internet and I'm at work. I don't have the time nor inclination to buttress every point. I'm stating my opinion, nothing more.
I call bullshit. If there was a right wing group out causing riots and shutting down free speech you would name it off the top of your head, or at least name affiliations. I can name 6 Democratic groups off the top of my head, and when you are home you can search the web for them.
You are confusing sex with gender. Sex is biological, gender is sociologic..
I hate to break it to you, but you are the one confused. Gender and Sex are both biology. I don't care who you want to have sex with or what you want to wear, you are still either male or female. We could argue the finer points of which of those things and under what conditions they are mental disorders versus a difference in morality, but you can't just make up stuff and say "science". That is not how science works.
As for the rest, the right has people like James O'Keefe making shit up and misrepresenting people to make his point. A number of people on the right claim to think discrimination against white people is as much as issue as that against minorities. So there's your analog to seeing discrimination that doesn't exist.
Well, now I'm wondering if you are truly just a brainwashed fool or a troll. O'Keefe brought down the corrupt organization called Acorn, brought down illegal super-PAC activity in the Democratic party, revealed top DNC operatives conspiring to not just rig the election but commit acts of terrorism (to which there have been 5 arrests made). Progressives will claim that he edited video of Planned Parenthood undercover work, and yet O'Keefe released all of the videos in full to prove no editing. The leftist media of course ignored the "rest".
Hint: Stop believing what you hear on MSM and relying on them for information. They are not there to inform, they are there to brainwash. This was admitted by not just Rachael Maddow (or however you spell it) on air, but by the VP of CNN. WP and other papers have stated that they will behave with bias against Republicans without any attempt at fairness. President Trump was not the only target of their claims, but any and all people who threaten the oligarchy.
If that's the case then why are they constantly talking about overturning Roe v. Wade? That is, after all, the case that put the question back to the states. Are you really saying that the Republicans and the right in general do not want to outlaw abortion? Really?
Which part of "NOT A FEDERAL ISSUE" was hard to understand? Roe vs Wade keeps control of the law in Federal Hands. That decision did not give complete control of abortion issues to States, it only gave a portion of those issues back.
Cats are not really pack animals but understand social hierarchy. If you let a cat rule the house they will, but if you are dominant (not to be confused with being an asshole) cats are fine. Dogs are pack animals who similarly need structure with you on top of the social structure. Social needs like playtime and grooming time have to accompany the normal duties of food, water, and litter/walks.
I see plenty of cat and dog owners that let their pets run the house. They tend to complain about how "bad" their pets are, in between excusing bouts of bad behavior.
Animal psychology is really not that difficult, but as with many subjects people don't educate themselves. A similar, if not same, type of person will often treat their kids like adults and want to be their friends instead of parents. Problems always tend to be directed at the external entity instead of themselves.
Who will be filing the most complaints? The people with money to pay astroturfers and sockpuppets? That is what we have everywhere else, so why would Google's app be any different?
What will the complaints be about? Same thing we see everywhere else, which is anything not pro communist/extreme leftist?
So you are saying that people only ever use language to establish stable beliefs in propositions, and that they never say anything purely to achieve emotional effect?
No, I never said anything resembling that statement. I stated that people either tell the truth, or they lie.
Your statement claimed that a dishonest statement claimed to be "bullshit" is not a lie. Which is _wrong_. If you claimed that in an alternative plane of existence it may be the truth, you are lying further.
You attempted to make a distinction between bullshit, lies, and honesty. I claimed rightfully that bullshit is a lie.
Fair enough, but I still think you are being a bit blind to what goes on on the right. I'll agree that the whole gender issue has been blown out of proportion. We seem to need perhaps more than two genders, but not 72.
Baseless allegation with no supporting facts, followed by a complete denial of science. I study the right as much as the left, so your claim is not only lacking supporting facts it has no place in reality. There are no "Right" wing platforms performing any of the actions I listed for the Left. The last bit is quite telling, since there are only 2 biological genders. If you claim that you need more, you are denying science and living in delusion.
Yeah, but again, I see the same on both sides. The Republican position on abortion is certainly "Live like we demand and the Government should punish you if you don't". They're even talking about restricting birth control now, which is just pants-on-head retarded to my mind.
The Republican position on Abortion is that it should be a State issue, not a Federal issue. Federal funding of abortions and birth control is not within the Federal Governments Constitutional Powers. What people rallied against recently was the Federal Government stopping the funding of Abortions overseas through planned parenthood. So your tax dollars were not simply supporting people here, but people across the world. That fiscal irresponsibility should really bother people. We are broke as a Country, with an accumulated debt of 240Trillion dollars. We have poor people of our own, poor education, and a massive amount of unemployment and underemployment.
For the State issue, I'd recommend the study what a Federation of States really means, and why we are not a big blob Government like England, or China, or France, or Russia. I would highly recommend as reading, the Federalist and anti-Federalist papers.
And when it comes to Abortion, Justice Anton Scalia said it brilliantly. I'll need to paraphrase a bit, but here goes. The act of abortion is not new to our century, in fact the practice goes back through thousands of years of history. Yet the founding fathers did not place any mention of abortion in the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, or anywhere else in our Founding documents. If the Founders thought the issue was worth mandating or denying through Federal powers, it would have a place in those documents. The fact that it's not there means that the power is a State issue. States can create laws independent of the Federal Government as long as they do not assume powers _from_ the Federal Government. The States should decide which is right and which is wrong, and the people who live in those States should be the ones who decide.
You have not described a "phenomenon", you made a false claim. Instead of admitting you are wrong, and caught in the act, you attempt to play word games. Cowardice at it's finest.
You are the only one that mentioned equality of outcome, which is an anti-American theme. The only way to ensure equality of outcome is to violate other people's rights.
The Declaration may not be "Law", but it is _the_ single most important document in American History. The Declaration of Independence is what founded the country. The document provides both the reason for discarding rule from England
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
And the principles that the Country should, and would, have.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
I'd recommend reading the whole Document. The Constitution is the Law used to protect the rights declared.
False equivalency. The push for equality is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. Conflicts after the Civil war are just as likely to have quelled movements toward equality as well as helped them.
So you are attempting to assert that "bullshit" is not a lie under certain circumstances? No, I'm not going to read a book about Bullshitting about lies. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. No matter what the purpose, no matter what the context, dishonesty is the exact opposite of honesty. Perhaps in your strange world, a person can be "almost" guilty of a crime too.
Sorry, but you are the one confused. There is no difference between "bullshitting" and a "white lie", which are both forms of lying. Both are dishonest, and the only argument you could attempt to use is that certain lies cause no harm.
If I told you that I drank 50 gallons of beer, I am bullshitting. That happens to also be a lie.
If your partner/spouse asks if they are fat and you say "no", and they happen to be fat.. you are telling a white lie. That happens to also be a lie.
So much for people being able to think critically today. Being dishonest is somehow not lying.. go figure.
As someone else said, lies are pretty easy to detect but you have to go find sources. It is amazing how media today does not provide actual sources, but layers of links to other sites repeating the same lie they themselves repeat. It is very time consuming to find actual truths, but I find it necessary today. Media has become masterful, sadly, at removing context to create a narrative based on a sliver of truth. Unfortunately, that is not the only way they lie (see below).
You are right that good bullshit appeals to emotion, but it's not quite as simple usually as reading an appeal to emotion fallacy. I think the telling thing is how people react when you suggest that people look for full sets of facts or provide a contrary opinions/conclusions. The hostility, especially from the left today, should set off people's bullshit meters.
This is an education video on how the media lies. This is also true of Politicians, just to be clear. A funny note here is that Sargon is a left of a true Liberal. I disagree with him at an intellectual level, but we could debate the disagreements. The leftists however, tend to hate him and slander him. "Dangerous thoughts" and all that.
You invented an exclusion that I never provided, but I'll bite since your response was polite. While there are certainly liars on the right, the difference is in a platform versus individuals. The Left running around claiming 72 genders, discrimination which does not exist against women, claims of bigotry when none exists and even creating hoaxes to back the invalid claim,claims of crime which do not exist among some groups and denying crime from others, and an overall loss of using facts for all of the above. There is no dialogue on the left, it's become pure Alinsky tactics.
Again, I see it as a difference in a really F'd up platform and individuals who lie. Long ago I was Democratic leaning and certainly believed in the principles of Liberal like "Live and let live". The progressive takeover of the Democratic party makes it a fascist communist movement, not "Liberal". It's no longer "Live and let live", it's "Live like we demand and the Government should punish you if you don't." Many in my family were also Democratic leaning, which should explain my early leanings. The Democrats have lost all support from everyone I know because of the fanaticism and loss of reality and facts.
You gave no evidence in your claim, you simply made up a fairy tale to back a broken assumption.
For your belief, basic evidence is being avoided. Outside of personal choice (based largely on biology), Aptitude and Skill Assessments are the largest factor in determining a degree track for both men and women. I seriously hope you are not going to attempt to claim that the same tests keeping men out of certain fields are biased against women, but hell... you probably will.
90% of school teachers are women. Are women brain washing kids away from certain subjects? That's a big part of your "theory". You don't consider evolutionary biology, just claim bias.
That to argue for rational dialogue and facts for consideration, people need to state things like "Please understand that I am not in any way saying that harassment in the workplace is OK." In an intellectual space the disclaimers should go without being said. Sadly, intellectuals are not the only ones in this space. I understand why you did, just pointing out something obvious for mass consideration.
Which are alleged to exist but nothing, not even a redacted screen shot, was provided. Have you links to Screenshots and Formal complaints that TFA does not provide, or are you just trolling?
Haha! You are funny! Romney and McCain are not a Conservatives, they are RINOs. Using Politifact, an extremely left wing organization, to debunk my claim is just sad. Funny though, that the Mitch McConnell link yields mostly trues. I'd honestly have to fact check your fact checker, because as mentioned they are grossly biased and remove context to make political claims. Nope, you are not paying me to be your researcher so won't happen. If you want to talk cash, leave contact information.
I don't know anyone on the Right who assumes someone is honest, even on their own team. We have to debate each other as much as we do the left. Gowdy and Chavez question Republicans just like they do the Dems. Meanwhile, the "Left" is still claiming women make 70c on the dollar. I won't get into their other lies, the list is way too long and not relevant to the conversation.
Doctors does not assume "medical doctor", but if you had bothered to read the link you would see that 70.8% of Medical Doctors Degrees are earned by women.68.9% are Education,etc... READ THE DAMN FACTS!
Your complaint is that women are not choosing to go into CS, Physical Sciences, or Engineering. I thought you were pro woman you bigoted simpleton! Nobody is forcing women into a specific career field. People like you are attempting to force them into it.
Slashdot Mirror
Once again, you speak from a position of authority which is completely devoid of evidence. How many people are currently using self-driving cars without the ability to operate a vehicle? How many of those same people have been involved in accidents?
Can you provide an argument without inventing fantasy arguments with no basis in reality? Yeah, I thought so.
So your supposition is that the only people involved in accidents have been 80 year old women? How about some numbers which demonstrate that even a single innocent 80 year old male or female have been the victims of accidents in self-driving cars? The extreme absurdity of your point makes it clear that you don't wish to have rational dialogue on the subject. Many (not to be confused with most) accidents have been DRIVER error, not computer error. This would back my original statement which you seem to grasp but lose in your "poor old lady" appeal to emotion.
I learned long ago that I cannot prove anything on the Internet.
Then perhaps you should consider that your knowledge and opinion are not well founded. I demonstrated here that there are no right wing groups attempting to squash first amendment rights with violence, and you have not been able to refute that point. In fact you simply dropped it because you can't provide any such evidence so realize your opinion is based on delusion. I gave the correct scientific answer to gender and sex, to which you make another false claim about perception meaning more than facts.
I'd agree that I can't make you provide or listen to facts, but that has nothing to do with Internet. That is your failure to adhere to logic and reason. Those same short comings are found all over, and I have no problem pointing out those failures when I see them. I further don't bend my own opinions based on "feels" over facts.
People buy the cars knowing what they are getting, so the majority of the insurance should be on the consumer. However, there should be a split between Manufacturer and Consumer in the case of a defect. For now at least, self-driving an option on a car and not a mandatory feature. I think there are numerous legal challenges, especially if the option becomes mandatory for any reason.
This will probably slow manufacturing of self driving cars. Cost will translate into massive fees on cars and "maintenance", which means people won't buy them. Government subsidies are just a way of waving hands and moving the fees to all tax payers instead of consumers.
Hey man, it's the Internet and I'm at work. I don't have the time nor inclination to buttress every point. I'm stating my opinion, nothing more.
I call bullshit. If there was a right wing group out causing riots and shutting down free speech you would name it off the top of your head, or at least name affiliations. I can name 6 Democratic groups off the top of my head, and when you are home you can search the web for them.
You are confusing sex with gender. Sex is biological, gender is sociologic..
I hate to break it to you, but you are the one confused. Gender and Sex are both biology. I don't care who you want to have sex with or what you want to wear, you are still either male or female. We could argue the finer points of which of those things and under what conditions they are mental disorders versus a difference in morality, but you can't just make up stuff and say "science". That is not how science works.
As for the rest, the right has people like James O'Keefe making shit up and misrepresenting people to make his point. A number of people on the right claim to think discrimination against white people is as much as issue as that against minorities. So there's your analog to seeing discrimination that doesn't exist.
Well, now I'm wondering if you are truly just a brainwashed fool or a troll. O'Keefe brought down the corrupt organization called Acorn, brought down illegal super-PAC activity in the Democratic party, revealed top DNC operatives conspiring to not just rig the election but commit acts of terrorism (to which there have been 5 arrests made). Progressives will claim that he edited video of Planned Parenthood undercover work, and yet O'Keefe released all of the videos in full to prove no editing. The leftist media of course ignored the "rest".
Hint: Stop believing what you hear on MSM and relying on them for information. They are not there to inform, they are there to brainwash. This was admitted by not just Rachael Maddow (or however you spell it) on air, but by the VP of CNN. WP and other papers have stated that they will behave with bias against Republicans without any attempt at fairness. President Trump was not the only target of their claims, but any and all people who threaten the oligarchy.
If that's the case then why are they constantly talking about overturning Roe v. Wade? That is, after all, the case that put the question back to the states. Are you really saying that the Republicans and the right in general do not want to outlaw abortion? Really?
Which part of "NOT A FEDERAL ISSUE" was hard to understand? Roe vs Wade keeps control of the law in Federal Hands. That decision did not give complete control of abortion issues to States, it only gave a portion of those issues back.
Cats are not really pack animals but understand social hierarchy. If you let a cat rule the house they will, but if you are dominant (not to be confused with being an asshole) cats are fine. Dogs are pack animals who similarly need structure with you on top of the social structure. Social needs like playtime and grooming time have to accompany the normal duties of food, water, and litter/walks.
I see plenty of cat and dog owners that let their pets run the house. They tend to complain about how "bad" their pets are, in between excusing bouts of bad behavior.
Animal psychology is really not that difficult, but as with many subjects people don't educate themselves. A similar, if not same, type of person will often treat their kids like adults and want to be their friends instead of parents. Problems always tend to be directed at the external entity instead of themselves.
Who will be filing the most complaints? The people with money to pay astroturfers and sockpuppets? That is what we have everywhere else, so why would Google's app be any different?
What will the complaints be about? Same thing we see everywhere else, which is anything not pro communist/extreme leftist?
This is a promotion of fascism, not freedom.
So you are saying that people only ever use language to establish stable beliefs in propositions, and that they never say anything purely to achieve emotional effect?
No, I never said anything resembling that statement. I stated that people either tell the truth, or they lie.
Your statement claimed that a dishonest statement claimed to be "bullshit" is not a lie. Which is _wrong_. If you claimed that in an alternative plane of existence it may be the truth, you are lying further.
You attempted to make a distinction between bullshit, lies, and honesty. I claimed rightfully that bullshit is a lie.
is Funny! :)
Fair enough, but I still think you are being a bit blind to what goes on on the right. I'll agree that the whole gender issue has been blown out of proportion. We seem to need perhaps more than two genders, but not 72.
Baseless allegation with no supporting facts, followed by a complete denial of science. I study the right as much as the left, so your claim is not only lacking supporting facts it has no place in reality. There are no "Right" wing platforms performing any of the actions I listed for the Left. The last bit is quite telling, since there are only 2 biological genders. If you claim that you need more, you are denying science and living in delusion.
Yeah, but again, I see the same on both sides. The Republican position on abortion is certainly "Live like we demand and the Government should punish you if you don't". They're even talking about restricting birth control now, which is just pants-on-head retarded to my mind.
The Republican position on Abortion is that it should be a State issue, not a Federal issue. Federal funding of abortions and birth control is not within the Federal Governments Constitutional Powers. What people rallied against recently was the Federal Government stopping the funding of Abortions overseas through planned parenthood. So your tax dollars were not simply supporting people here, but people across the world. That fiscal irresponsibility should really bother people. We are broke as a Country, with an accumulated debt of 240Trillion dollars. We have poor people of our own, poor education, and a massive amount of unemployment and underemployment.
For the State issue, I'd recommend the study what a Federation of States really means, and why we are not a big blob Government like England, or China, or France, or Russia. I would highly recommend as reading, the Federalist and anti-Federalist papers.
And when it comes to Abortion, Justice Anton Scalia said it brilliantly. I'll need to paraphrase a bit, but here goes. The act of abortion is not new to our century, in fact the practice goes back through thousands of years of history. Yet the founding fathers did not place any mention of abortion in the US Constitution, Bill of Rights, or anywhere else in our Founding documents. If the Founders thought the issue was worth mandating or denying through Federal powers, it would have a place in those documents. The fact that it's not there means that the power is a State issue. States can create laws independent of the Federal Government as long as they do not assume powers _from_ the Federal Government. The States should decide which is right and which is wrong, and the people who live in those States should be the ones who decide.
You have not described a "phenomenon", you made a false claim. Instead of admitting you are wrong, and caught in the act, you attempt to play word games. Cowardice at it's finest.
You are the only one that mentioned equality of outcome, which is an anti-American theme. The only way to ensure equality of outcome is to violate other people's rights.
The Declaration may not be "Law", but it is _the_ single most important document in American History. The Declaration of Independence is what founded the country. The document provides both the reason for discarding rule from England
When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
And the principles that the Country should, and would, have.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
I'd recommend reading the whole Document. The Constitution is the Law used to protect the rights declared.
False equivalency. The push for equality is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence. Conflicts after the Civil war are just as likely to have quelled movements toward equality as well as helped them.
So you are attempting to assert that "bullshit" is not a lie under certain circumstances? No, I'm not going to read a book about Bullshitting about lies. A lie, is a lie, is a lie. No matter what the purpose, no matter what the context, dishonesty is the exact opposite of honesty. Perhaps in your strange world, a person can be "almost" guilty of a crime too.
Sorry, but you are the one confused. There is no difference between "bullshitting" and a "white lie", which are both forms of lying. Both are dishonest, and the only argument you could attempt to use is that certain lies cause no harm.
If I told you that I drank 50 gallons of beer, I am bullshitting. That happens to also be a lie.
If your partner/spouse asks if they are fat and you say "no", and they happen to be fat.. you are telling a white lie. That happens to also be a lie.
So much for people being able to think critically today. Being dishonest is somehow not lying.. go figure.
As someone else said, lies are pretty easy to detect but you have to go find sources. It is amazing how media today does not provide actual sources, but layers of links to other sites repeating the same lie they themselves repeat. It is very time consuming to find actual truths, but I find it necessary today. Media has become masterful, sadly, at removing context to create a narrative based on a sliver of truth. Unfortunately, that is not the only way they lie (see below).
You are right that good bullshit appeals to emotion, but it's not quite as simple usually as reading an appeal to emotion fallacy. I think the telling thing is how people react when you suggest that people look for full sets of facts or provide a contrary opinions/conclusions. The hostility, especially from the left today, should set off people's bullshit meters.
This is an education video on how the media lies. This is also true of Politicians, just to be clear. A funny note here is that Sargon is a left of a true Liberal. I disagree with him at an intellectual level, but we could debate the disagreements. The leftists however, tend to hate him and slander him. "Dangerous thoughts" and all that.
You invented an exclusion that I never provided, but I'll bite since your response was polite. While there are certainly liars on the right, the difference is in a platform versus individuals. The Left running around claiming 72 genders, discrimination which does not exist against women, claims of bigotry when none exists and even creating hoaxes to back the invalid claim,claims of crime which do not exist among some groups and denying crime from others, and an overall loss of using facts for all of the above. There is no dialogue on the left, it's become pure Alinsky tactics.
Again, I see it as a difference in a really F'd up platform and individuals who lie. Long ago I was Democratic leaning and certainly believed in the principles of Liberal like "Live and let live". The progressive takeover of the Democratic party makes it a fascist communist movement, not "Liberal". It's no longer "Live and let live", it's "Live like we demand and the Government should punish you if you don't." Many in my family were also Democratic leaning, which should explain my early leanings. The Democrats have lost all support from everyone I know because of the fanaticism and loss of reality and facts.
You gave no evidence in your claim, you simply made up a fairy tale to back a broken assumption.
For your belief, basic evidence is being avoided. Outside of personal choice (based largely on biology), Aptitude and Skill Assessments are the largest factor in determining a degree track for both men and women. I seriously hope you are not going to attempt to claim that the same tests keeping men out of certain fields are biased against women, but hell... you probably will.
90% of school teachers are women. Are women brain washing kids away from certain subjects? That's a big part of your "theory". You don't consider evolutionary biology, just claim bias.
That to argue for rational dialogue and facts for consideration, people need to state things like "Please understand that I am not in any way saying that harassment in the workplace is OK." In an intellectual space the disclaimers should go without being said. Sadly, intellectuals are not the only ones in this space. I understand why you did, just pointing out something obvious for mass consideration.
Which are alleged to exist but nothing, not even a redacted screen shot, was provided. Have you links to Screenshots and Formal complaints that TFA does not provide, or are you just trolling?
Haha! You are funny! Romney and McCain are not a Conservatives, they are RINOs. Using Politifact, an extremely left wing organization, to debunk my claim is just sad. Funny though, that the Mitch McConnell link yields mostly trues. I'd honestly have to fact check your fact checker, because as mentioned they are grossly biased and remove context to make political claims. Nope, you are not paying me to be your researcher so won't happen. If you want to talk cash, leave contact information.
I don't know anyone on the Right who assumes someone is honest, even on their own team. We have to debate each other as much as we do the left. Gowdy and Chavez question Republicans just like they do the Dems. Meanwhile, the "Left" is still claiming women make 70c on the dollar. I won't get into their other lies, the list is way too long and not relevant to the conversation.
Your information is way out of date, at lesat for US information. 78% of Medical Doctors are Women. https://www.aei.org/publicatio...
Doctors does not assume "medical doctor", but if you had bothered to read the link you would see that 70.8% of Medical Doctors Degrees are earned by women.68.9% are Education,etc... READ THE DAMN FACTS!
Your complaint is that women are not choosing to go into CS, Physical Sciences, or Engineering. I thought you were pro woman you bigoted simpleton! Nobody is forcing women into a specific career field. People like you are attempting to force them into it.