Apparently there is nobody on slashdot with any experience with the ethical requirements of doing psychological studies. Psychology is just not STEM-y enough, maybe.
You could be being silenced by the conspiracy to keep people from realizing that energy and wealth have an equivalency. (That conspiracy wants you to believe the economy is a thermodynamically closed system of labor and capital.)
Apparently what makes a crucial difference is the length of the delay: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
But your logic does not explain why the length of the delay makes a crucial difference: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
Apparently, it's only illegal if there is not a sufficient delay: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
And you will be wrong, because what will actually happen is firms will be forced to use their employees in a higher-productivity way (through various types of investments).
This is how it's supposed to work. A higher minimum wage forces firms to use their employees more productively (by training, investing in equipment, etc). Workers will rise in productivity to meet the minimum wage, since using workers in a low-productivity way is no longer a legal option.
However, it doesn't work the way around: greater productivity has *not* led to higher wages, for the 99% in the last 30-40 years, the way we learned it in Econ 101. That truism has been proved false with recent experience.
Anyway, this is my own innovative theory, but I stand by it empirically.
I thought the whole point of Tesla was to make luxury sports cars. Is the Nissan Leaf a luxury sports car? If not, what is the point of this obvious comparison of non-sports car features?
Off topic: Some comments appearing on beta slashdot as serif typefaces is a bug not a feature. The font-family is "Helvetica sans-serif", which doesn't actually exist. Maybe there should be a comma in there.
Hitler was a nationalist, not an internationalist. So your point makes no sense.
Problems of the commons cannot, by definition, be solved by the actions of individuals.
"Syntax error on token "=", = expected" or "ReferenceError: Invalid left-hand side in assignment"
Apparently there is nobody on slashdot with any experience with the ethical requirements of doing psychological studies. Psychology is just not STEM-y enough, maybe.
Asian women still count as women though, presumably.
Because white privilege, duh.
Asians are the invisible demographic.
Asians are invisible, I guess.
You could be being silenced by the conspiracy to keep people from realizing that energy and wealth have an equivalency. (That conspiracy wants you to believe the economy is a thermodynamically closed system of labor and capital.)
Apparently what makes a crucial difference is the length of the delay: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
But your logic does not explain why the length of the delay makes a crucial difference: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
Apparently, it's only illegal if there is not a sufficient delay: "Justice Breyer stressed that the decision said nothing about downloading a TV program in order to recover it and keep it on hand for somewhat later viewing."
It's ASU, not University of Phoenix.
You mean who hacked his luggage.
And you will be wrong, because what will actually happen is firms will be forced to use their employees in a higher-productivity way (through various types of investments).
This is how it's supposed to work. A higher minimum wage forces firms to use their employees more productively (by training, investing in equipment, etc). Workers will rise in productivity to meet the minimum wage, since using workers in a low-productivity way is no longer a legal option. However, it doesn't work the way around: greater productivity has *not* led to higher wages, for the 99% in the last 30-40 years, the way we learned it in Econ 101. That truism has been proved false with recent experience. Anyway, this is my own innovative theory, but I stand by it empirically.
Any instance falsifies "all", so "all" is falsifiable, or at least as much as any specific instance.
More than surprised: perplexed, puzzled, annoyed, contemptuous.
I thought the whole point of Tesla was to make luxury sports cars. Is the Nissan Leaf a luxury sports car? If not, what is the point of this obvious comparison of non-sports car features?
Off topic: Some comments appearing on beta slashdot as serif typefaces is a bug not a feature. The font-family is "Helvetica sans-serif", which doesn't actually exist. Maybe there should be a comma in there.
The next world's fair will be in Milan, Italy, 2015. http://www.milanworldsfair.com/