The headline says they're replacing "Window Phone" with "Windows", but this is totally wrong.
They're replacing "Windows Phone" with "Microsoft Lumia", and dropping the Nokia name completely as fast as possible.
Interesting thought experiment: how do you differentiate a non-profit competitor from a merely poorly run competitor that doesn't set prices to maximize profits?
Let's take this one example. In Macroeconomics 101, there is the formula: MV = PY
M = money supply, V = velocity of money, P = price level, Y = real GDP
So an increase in P (inflation) could be many things, not just an expansion of M (money supply). Even your knowledge of the model is wrong. How much more so your understanding that reality demands more complex models as the reality you're investigating is more complex.
You did not code your argument in a series of logical steps to arrive at the desired result of demonstrating your conclusion that something here is "insulting". Perhaps that is because you believe such a thing is not to be done with a method of communication!
Makes as much sense as Lucas's claim that the robots flying around on Mustafar in Revenge of the Sith are "energy collectors", collecting energy from the lava. Because they are hot, I guess. So you want to collect... the lava because it is hot.
For an associate professor, you're not so good with explaining concepts. What you need is an example of genetic variance in a population of sheep and an example of environmental variance, that fits with ordinary reality. As the influence of environmental variance approaches zero, the additional nuance of the environment's influence on genetic variation is insignificant.
Slashdot Mirror
That's like calling spam "free advice".
The headline says they're replacing "Window Phone" with "Windows", but this is totally wrong. They're replacing "Windows Phone" with "Microsoft Lumia", and dropping the Nokia name completely as fast as possible.
Tips fedora.
As a man, I say speak for yourself, "sausagefest" does not offend me whatsoever.
Civ III. Civ V doesn't permit military stacks of death.
That doesn't lock out USB connections.
I don't want to eat insecticides.
What would a ruler want with an entire population of peasant women?
Interesting thought experiment: how do you differentiate a non-profit competitor from a merely poorly run competitor that doesn't set prices to maximize profits?
Why not pump from rivers instead of lakes?
The U.S. exports its water now, in the form of food. So your concern-trolling is disproportionate to reality.
What about the NDK, which most apps use?
inflation is expansion of the money supply
Let's take this one example. In Macroeconomics 101, there is the formula: MV = PY
M = money supply, V = velocity of money, P = price level, Y = real GDP
So an increase in P (inflation) could be many things, not just an expansion of M (money supply). Even your knowledge of the model is wrong. How much more so your understanding that reality demands more complex models as the reality you're investigating is more complex.
You did not code your argument in a series of logical steps to arrive at the desired result of demonstrating your conclusion that something here is "insulting". Perhaps that is because you believe such a thing is not to be done with a method of communication!
Money spent on space used to be dual-use (civilian and military). Now it's single-use (military), and the civilian stuff is private.
More population = more people to keep from starving
Makes as much sense as Lucas's claim that the robots flying around on Mustafar in Revenge of the Sith are "energy collectors", collecting energy from the lava. Because they are hot, I guess. So you want to collect ... the lava because it is hot.
As are their opposites for gene propagation. Or else aggression would hypertrophy, which it doesn't.
For an associate professor, you're not so good with explaining concepts. What you need is an example of genetic variance in a population of sheep and an example of environmental variance, that fits with ordinary reality. As the influence of environmental variance approaches zero, the additional nuance of the environment's influence on genetic variation is insignificant.
Wait, did you just imply that it's security via obfuscation?
In reality, it's the advertisements that serve the role of promising to make us happy.
You're making a political argument, to which there are political counter-arguments.
Actually, what we need is to sufficiently reduce the corruption of politics by money everywhere. But this is impossible.
> let's fight gravity! The analogy would be closer to fighting obesity.
China's government is more corrupt than the U.S. government. This is true. Corruption of politics by money everywhere is the root problem.