Slashdot Mirror


User: Zemplar

Zemplar's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
486
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 486

  1. Re:Any reason to switch? on FreeBSD 6.1 Released · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Any notable reasons to try FreeBSD?"

    Sure, it's better than GNU/Linux, IMHO. Additionally, FreeBSD is a complete OS, not just a kernel.

    If your preference is for structure and good engineering, you'll like FreeBSD. However, if you use hot glue and duct tape to fix everything, stick with Linux. This isn't a bash on GNU/Linux, since both work, but merely a quick idea of their "personality".

  2. Re:Outfoxed? on How IBM Out-foxed Intel With The Xbox 360 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm glad someone else caught that. Goodwill != Market Capitalization, and any such comparison between the two between companies (X Goodwill to Y Market Cap) is meaningless.

  3. Re:The best cure for such spam is... on Next Generation Spam Zombies Will Use Data Mining · · Score: 1

    "But besides that, maybe an ISP should by default block all but a few outbound ports unless the user requests them specifically..."

    I certainly don't think ISP's should be the one's responsible for trying to secure the internet. IMHO, ISP's should not block any ports and should only provide connectivity services...all of them.

    Where's Mr. Internet (Al Gore) when you need him? We need a law passed that requires anyone connecting to the internet is required to received a state license, and an international license if they wish to use internet outside of their own country. Additionally, I'll startup my own insurance company selling government mandated "internet insurance". And no, *collision* isn't covered!

    Anyone found breaking the good Samaritan laws of the internet can be fined (except for speeding) and have their license revoked. BUI (blogging under the influence) is actually encourage to better increase the quality of most blogs.

    Repeat violators will we forced to work the help desk for the worlds largest Microsoft-only enterprise.

  4. IE: "Billions and Billions Served" on IE The Great Microsoft Blunder? · · Score: 1

    And just like the fast-food compliment, IE also leaves a bad taste in your mouth...

  5. Re:Memory bank? on Start-up Could Kick Opteron into Overdrive · · Score: 1

    Just a guess, but after RTFA, the include photo shows and Opteron CPU with populated memory banks and the DRC product's memory banks empty. Perhaps this is a hint?

  6. Re:neural networks or java? on Start-up Could Kick Opteron into Overdrive · · Score: 1

    "...Servers running on java, anyone?"

    Why not? This sounds perfectly complementary to me since most Sys Admins also run on java.

  7. Re:Question for the hardware techies on Timeline Set for Intel/AMD Antitrust Trial · · Score: 1

    Make that >1 or >=2

  8. Re:If it works now on Windows to Linux Migration - File Server Security? · · Score: 1

    I'd sure hope anyone subject to BSA audits would use Solaris or some other Vendor supported version of Linux (RedHat, Novell, etc.)! Keeping on topic, Microsoft software should not be accounted in as an asset but as a liability, especially in this industry.

    SOX is just to far-reaching to try to save a buck by going the Redmond route...hire real professionals.

  9. Re:slower to warm... slower to cool on Self Contained Water Cooled Radeon X1900, Retail · · Score: 1

    Poor conclusion. The high heat capacity allows for lots of heat transer, in either direction. Without enough information about the copper waterblock and radiator on the cooling end you cannot make an assuption that it will cool slower. Simply this all depends on the design performance.

  10. Re:No newbie guides on Top 5 Reasons People Dismiss PostgreSQL · · Score: 1
  11. Re:Number 1 (missing) reason on Top 5 Reasons People Dismiss PostgreSQL · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there is still time for you all to attend the PostgreSQL High-Availability Webinar on March 23rd?

  12. Re:Great name choice! on SCO Offers Up The 'SCAMP' Stack · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just prefer the first "SCAM" definition name for short.

  13. Re: VMware okay, but VERY limited on No EFI Support for Vista · · Score: 1

    Call me crazy, but generally I would think that the best developers for any given platform also use the same platform for development?

  14. Re: VMware okay, but VERY limited on No EFI Support for Vista · · Score: 1

    VMware does make a good product, but by not making a generic UNIX host (Solaris 10, Apple, & Linux) I believe this limits their uptake. I'm not "downgrading" to Linux from Solaris to run VMware but would buy a copy today if I could run VMware on a Solaris host.

    Fortunately, the innovations in Solaris such as Brandz (formerly "Project Janus"), may enable a Linux version of VMware to run anyway.

    Who really wants to purchase VMware to run Solaris or Linux guests on a Windows host???

  15. Re:Blame [& Pay] Bill on The Microsoft Salary and Review System · · Score: 1

    "Bill Gates obviously thinks 64k should be enough for anybody."

    With the obvious exclusion of Bill himself!

  16. Re:Sgt. Irony, reporting for duty, sir! on Are Marines Censoring Web Access for Troops in Iraq? · · Score: 1
    Indeed, we're prepared for everything.

    USMC & Navy Rules for Combat

    USMC Rules for Combat

    • Bring a gun. Preferably, bring at least two guns. Bring all of your friends who have guns.
    • Anything worth shooting is worth shooting twice. Ammo is cheap. Life is expensive.
    • Only hits count. The only thing worse than a miss is a slow miss.
    • If your shooting stance is good, you're probably not moving fast enough nor using cover correctly.
    • Move away from your attacker. Distance is your friend. (Lateral and diagonal movement are preferred.)
    • If you can choose what to bring to a gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun.
    • In ten years nobody will remember the details of caliber, stance, or tactics. They will only remember who lived.
    • If you are not shooting, you should be communicating, reloading, and running.
    • Accuracy is relative: most combat shooting standards will be more dependent on "pucker factor" than the inherent accuracy of the gun.
    • Use a gun that works EVERY TIME. "All skill is in vain when an Angel pisses in the flintlock of your musket."
    • Someday someone may kill you with your own gun, but they should have to beat you to death with it because it is empty.
    • Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.
    • Have a plan.
    • Have a back-up plan, because the first one won't work.
    • Use cover or concealment as much as possible.
    • Flank your adversary when possible. Protect yours.
    • Don't drop your guard.
    • Always tactical load and threat scan 360 degrees.
    • Watch their hands. Hands kill. (In God we trust. Everyone else, keep your hands where I can see them).
    • Decide to be aggressive ENOUGH, quickly ENOUGH.
    • The faster you finish the fight, the less shot you will get.
    • Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
    • Be courteous to everyone, friendly to no one.
    • Your number one Option for Personal Security is a lifelong commitment to avoidance, deterrence, and de-escalation.
    • Do not attend a gunfight with a handgun, the caliber of which does not start with a "4."

    Navy Rules for Combat

    • Go to Sea
    • Send the Marines
    • Drink Coffee


    Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
  17. Re:Logs on U of Wisconsin's Mac OS X Security Challenge · · Score: 1

    Yep, I even thought of this later after I finished my cup of coffee. It wouldn't be "real-time" but could be sufficiently close to be useful.

  18. Re:Logs on U of Wisconsin's Mac OS X Security Challenge · · Score: 1

    True, but would not the access from another box provide another potential breach point and statistically skew our security findings?

  19. Re:Traffic growth -- really exponential? on U of Wisconsin's Mac OS X Security Challenge · · Score: 1

    The exponential growth factor was pulled out of the air and was based on the probability of growth [human interest] of such a cool contest with live logs. Nothing more.

  20. Re:Logs on U of Wisconsin's Mac OS X Security Challenge · · Score: 1

    In effect, that would turn into a DDOS quite quickly once the logs grow and site traffic increases exponentially. Still, the idea would be cool to see...perhaps if hosted on one of Sun's 8-core Niagara chips instead of a Mac Mini.

    A hybrid solution would be a summary of the logs and perhaps a popularity percentage and other "smart" metrics.

  21. Re:This is surprising how? on Will MacIntel Kill Apple Open Source Efforts? · · Score: 1

    It may have once been an ugly step child, however, "Snapple" (as some have coined this idea) could make great in-roads into the corporate environment. Perhaps the Sun/Apple collaboration could allow terms that Apple serves the Home/Home Office users and Sun serves (and sells support contracts for) the large corporate users.

    "A synergistic Win/Win"

  22. Re:This is surprising how? on Will MacIntel Kill Apple Open Source Efforts? · · Score: 1

    "actually, if this really happened it wouldn't suck. solaris 10 has quite a lot of good stuff in it (DTrace!!!)."

    I totally concur that Solaris is fantastic but this idea doesn't, as you so elegantly phrased, "suck". Imagine all of the goodness of Solaris with a easy to use GUI for those that want/need it. Then again, [this is the part that doesn't "suck"] all of the CLI tools and Solaris specific features and advantages would remain intact! Very cool if you ask me.

    Another cool thing. Users start with the GUI and are immediately productive and can learn or master the OS's full potential at a later time, IF they desire...not because it's necessary to do anything useful with the OS.

  23. Re:This is surprising how? on Will MacIntel Kill Apple Open Source Efforts? · · Score: 1
  24. Re:This is surprising how? on Will MacIntel Kill Apple Open Source Efforts? · · Score: 4, Funny

    [throws gas on the fire]

    This is because Apple is moving from Darwin to Solaris 10 x86 as its GUI code base!





    Okay, okay, not stop spreading nasty rumors and get back to work!

  25. My first computer wasn't nearly so fancy... on What Was Your First Computer? · · Score: 1

    This was my first computer.