Slashdot Mirror


Self Contained Water Cooled Radeon X1900, Retail

Spinnerbait writes "Graphics cards are all the rage in the Enthusiast Computing community, where overclocking standard off-the-shelf components is commonplace. Recently innovative cooling solutions have been brought to Graphics cards in an effort to tame the thermals of their power hungry GPUs. It looks like some of the major vendors have taken it up a notch in this area, with this ATI-based Sapphire Graphics card that employs a self-contained water cooling system. Not only does the card have potential for serious overclocking but it should do so relatively quietly as well."

129 comments

  1. More Power! by cosmotron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how much power this uses if you have your own water cooling for everything else, then a seperate system just for your video card?

    --
    Ryan - http://www.thecosmotron.com/
    1. Re:More Power! by hador_nyc · · Score: 1

      I use a Zalman reservator1 for the watercooling in my system. My processor and videocard are cooled in the same water circuit, with pleanty of extra cooling capability to spare considering I have both chips (CPU and VC) heavily overclocked. All of this is cooled via the standard 5W pump; which is basically a fish tank pump. The truth is that I am using fewer total watts then before considering I have removed 3 case fans and the stock fans on the processor and video card. The whole PC is now much quieter considering only the PSU has a fan on it now.

      Mind you this is not an advertisement for Zalman, I'm just trying to describe in detail what I actually own.

      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    2. Re:More Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the water cooler uses a small fan... move along

  2. But does it run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, no, it's from ATI, nevermind.

  3. Water cooler? by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    Man, I've always wanted a water cooler in my PC. Maybe now if I press "Tab", I really do get a Tab?

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
    1. Re:Water cooler? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Man, I've always wanted a water cooler in my PC.

      The main problem is finding stores that carry those little tiny jugs of antifreeze.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Water cooler? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  4. What a shitty submission. by Spazntwich · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "article" is a shitty little blurb with a few pictures. Not a single performance number or any bit of useful information.

    My first instinct? Check the link for the submitter's webpage. Oh, what a coincidence.

    Look, I'm not one to normally complain about poor stories and worthless submissions, but this one takes the cake. It's the most obvious grab for clicks and advertisement revenue that's been posted on /. in a while.

    For shame, CowboyNeal.

    1. Re:What a shitty submission. by apollosfire · · Score: 1

      Aha, but his site's been slashdotted!

    2. Re:What a shitty submission. by Chapium · · Score: 1

      Please...

      Just because its his site doesn't make it any less news.

    3. Re:What a shitty submission. by Spazntwich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't complain if he waited until they ran benchmarks, tried overclocking it, or had some actual news to report.

      You know, the kinds of details that usually make it into a news article. This is "Hey, look. It's a videocard with a waterblock on it. Betcha never seen one of them before!" and the fact that it's shameless self-promotion only makes it worse.

    4. Re:What a shitty submission. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, get a life will you? This is a very informative short pictorial. It shows this brand new and rather interesting product in good detail. Yes, no benchmarks or tests, so what? They said they're going to follow-up with a full article. What just because it's a post with a bunch of detailed pics, it's no good??

      And of course the author is probably from the site... why not? It's still very much newsworthy in my opinion.

      Get off your soapbox.

    5. Re:What a shitty submission. by tinkertim · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO! Its on a shared web hosting server to boot it seems. Seems MySQL isn't available .. but the banners seem to load just fine .. hmmm.

      (mental note to add no self slashdotting to AUP on my hosting sites).

      List to do today :

      1 - Shoot self in foot
      2 - Self Slashdot
      3 - Find new web host (looks like he got suspended? Just re-checked and getting a blank)
      4 - Make static pages

      The card itself is a great idea (Not a huge fan of ATI but I'll wait for the specs), idea itself sounds solid and kinda neat. Too bad a few million people now equate it with:

      Service Unavailable

      (sigh..) Buddy, ATI didn't need your help for that :)

    6. Re:What a shitty submission. by Heembo · · Score: 1

      Isn't this called Slashertising or something like that? Shouldn't we charge a fee, boil him in oil, DRDoS his server, or tar and feather the boy?

      --
      Horns are really just a broken halo.
    7. Re:What a shitty submission. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot Hardware's reviews tend to suck. I used to handle stories for a fairly high-traffic hardware site, and Hot Hardware's articles were almost always pretty crappy.

    8. Re:What a shitty submission. by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the site is called HOThardware, and they're reviewing (if you want to call it that) a water COOLed graphics card.
      Besides, all the fancy graphics hardware in the world can't prevent the Slashdot Effect!

      --
      Register the editry.
    9. Re:What a shitty submission. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For shame, CowboyNeal.

      What else?

    10. Re:What a shitty submission. by Filiks · · Score: 1

      Since the /. article blurb is accompanied by the "tagging beta" that says "slashvertisement", who really deserves blame here? Not the submitter, but either /., or the readers who clicked anyway and then complained.

  5. nice teaser by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Since the article is really only a teaser, there isn't much to be said about it. However, assuming this thing works well, it's a nice direction to see the high-end GPU market head towards. Now if only I could afford one...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:nice teaser by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      I like how the slashdot tag already says 'slashvertisement'. That just gets it over with, if you don't like these articles, you can skip it!

      Anyway, I thought it interesting enough to look at it, there are several things I don't understand:

      - There's still a fan in there! Why does this thing help reduce noise? Doesn't it just places all the heat to another place, using a just as noisy fan there to get rid of it? Is there anyone who can say something useful about this

      - This is a very silly trend of course. If every device had its own complete water cooling system, your pc case would become pretty full with those bulky water cooling pci cards. Seems like not very good for the airflow in the case to me (or don't you need airflow then anymore?). If you're into water cooling, just make one cooling system to cool all. They'd better make a card with only the watercooling in/outlet connections built in so you can integrate it into your water cooling system.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  6. Thats all great but... by Monkeys!!! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Overclock all you want and you are still playing the same game as everyone else.

    I'm not trolling, I'm just bitter that everyone is focused on pushing the graphical boundaries of games and leaving the game play for later. I remember a time when it was about hours of game play not frames per second.

    *goes off to play Deus Ex*

    1. Re:Thats all great but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not trolling, I'm just bitter that everyone is focused on pushing the graphical boundaries
      >of games and leaving the game play for later. I remember a time when it was about hours of
      >game play not frames per second.

      Make yourself a gift and go buy a Gamecube, Zelda Windwaker, Metroid Prime, Metroid Prime 2, Pikmin and Pikmin 2.

    2. Re:Thats all great but... by Aqws · · Score: 1

      Glad to see i'm not the only one who still plays that game!

    3. Re:Thats all great but... by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Overclock all you want and you are still playing the same game as everyone else.

      Rendering power is overrated when talking about game graphics. If you look at World of Warcraft, the game looks incredible. But it looks incredible on lower-end systems too... the art direction is just spot on across the board. Half-Life 2 uses some neat graphical tricks, but in general the game looks amazing because the artists had a clear vision of what they were creating and ensured that every pixel that went on the screen supports that. Look at the detail in the tree leaves... they're not super high-poly, they're just beautiful.

      If your graphics card is good enough to run all of today's games, your graphics card is good enough. There really is no reason to spend 300 dollars every two years when spending 80 every two would be sufficient. If you want better looking games, look to lead artists, not to GPU engineers.

    4. Re:Thats all great but... by hador_nyc · · Score: 1
      Overclock all you want and you are still playing the same game as everyone else.
      True, but I think most of us overclock for the sheer fun of it. I agree, though, these days there is hardly the use for it that there once was; if there ever was.
      --
      - Mike
      Once you've lost your temper, you've lost the argument - Me
    5. Re:Thats all great but... by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Ah, but getting 210,000 frames per hour is so much better than only getting 205,000 frames per hour!

    6. Re:Thats all great but... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      People associate overclocking with fancy cooling systems, but if this runs at normal operating paramaters hot enough to require a water cooling system, it's not exactly ideal for overclocking... it's already up toward the limit of heat dissipation at the default retail speed.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  7. I'll Pass... by evilviper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really don't want graphics cards with better cooling systems. I want them to RUN COOLER in the first place. Water-cooling a device just allows you to push the problem back a little further, before it really starts causing problems. Pretty soon you'll have to upgrade your power supply and home airconditioner to use a shinny new GPU.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:I'll Pass... by iamplupp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. And all it takes is lowering the frequency by maybe 20% and you will be able to run it on much lower voltage and thus less power. And who needs that extra 20% anyway, really?

  8. External PCI-X connector by Twillerror · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it is about time to start thinking about the GPU as a device, like a cd-rom or harrdrive instead of a card.

    They already require an external power supply in some cases, and with SLI are using a special type of connector.

    I'd like to see a GPU that comes in the form of a 5.25 bay expansion, with a pci-x card that connects it via a cable to the mobo.

    Then I think the industry could come up with a standard cable for all cards. Or not, given that nvidia or whoever could come up with just about anything. I could see a card that interfaces through the memory slots ( if your motherboard had enough realastate). A GPU directly connected to Hypertransport anyone?

    1. Re:External PCI-X connector by thebes · · Score: 2, Informative

      As cool as that would be, the frequencies, data rates and low latencies required for a video card would cause the cable to be prohibitively expensive in order for the error/corruption rate to be comparable to a plug in card.

    2. Re:External PCI-X connector by rjmars97 · · Score: 1

      while you have an interesting idea, i don't think anything like that will be made in the near future for amyn reasons. first off, it would go against an industry form factor (PCI type expansion slots) that has been in place for a lomg time, and companies like nvidia and ATI would not want to risk making a venture outside such a long standing form.

      another problem with changing the form for graphics units is comaptibility, as i for one do not have a free 5.25" bay in which to put something (i already have 3 5.25" hard drive bays and a DVD drive, as i ran out of 3.5" slots). this is also link to the fact the the current pci type clot is a long running standard. making a cable from an external device would be tricky, but would probally work if heavily shielded.

      a video card interfacing through the memory bus? highly unlikely, as there are significant differences between the memory bus and a video bus. you would have to create a hybrid bus that could handle both data types, which would complicate things and just make everything slower. the GPU fetches a lot of data from the main memory, but placing the entire GPU on that memory bus is a bad idea.

      currently, video cards are not at the point where such measures need to be taken, and i hope that time does not come. as i'm sure other people have said on here, i think there should be more work on making cards run cooler and use less power. everything has been a chase for performance without much concern for heat and power use. when it reaches the point where the cards are just getting too hot, i think they will making more of an effort for make the more efficent. the new geforce 7900 cards did this by performing better with LESS transistors than the previous generation. i think once heat and power use become too much of a factor for the cards to sell, the companies will start to make them cooler and more efficent.

      --
      Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    3. Re:External PCI-X connector by brwski · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'd like to see entirely modular computers. Implement it like legos: bricks stuck to each other. The interconnects would be awful, but if it could be done, and made hot-swappable, it would be way cool --- and would allow nearly eternal upgrades. Why replace the CPU each year when you can just slap a newer one on and have them all going? And so forth.

      --

      brwski
      "Because without beer, things do not seem to go as well''

    4. Re:External PCI-X connector by rjmars97 · · Score: 1

      well CPU's are modular, you can put a new one in so long as its compatable. i have a socket 939 motherboard and have many upgrade options as my needs change. sure socket 939 will be phased out when a better format comes along, but by the time i run out of 939 options, i'll want something new to begin with. computers are very modular and upgradable, its just that new upgrade options are coming out so frequently. i still use my 166MHz thinkpad laptop everyday because it works great for what i use it for (web browsing and word processing do not need a powerful computer).

      while i agree when things are modular it makes things easier, i think computers have done a good job so far of making things interchangable. today you can buy any kind of PCI card and not have major hardware issues (software is another thing), where as in the 80's and early 90's, everything was hardware specific. take a look at an old windows 95 era compaq or similar and try to see how many standard parts are in it... basically none.

      currenty, things can be improved somewhat, but for the most part, i'm happy with the level of upgradeability offered. many companies realized that propriatary formats for hardware are a bad idea... if only software companies would realize the same thing.

      --
      Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer
    5. Re:External PCI-X connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to mention it:

      http://matrox.com/graphics/extio/

      So there is a small PCIe card that plugs into the computer and looks awfully like a PCIe to fiberoptic bridge. The other end is the box with a graphics chipset, multiple DVI ports, and some usb/audio connections. Now the thing to note is

      1) This is likely going to have a 4 price tag
      2) It's a Matrox video card that runs off a x1 PCIe connection.
      3) Enthusiast video cards are likely going to want at least a x4 PCIe connection
      4) Last time I looked at fiber interface modules, I got the impression that the raw parts are going to run in the $100's for something that can do x1 PCIe bandwidth (2.5 GBits/sec, full duplex), never mind something that would target a higher end video card.

    6. Re:External PCI-X connector by icedcool · · Score: 1

      Phhbb... pretty soon your not going to hook your vid card to your pc, you'll hook your pc to your vidcard.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    7. Re:External PCI-X connector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see a GPU that comes in the form of a 5.25 bay expansion, with a pci-x card that connects it via a cable to the mobo.

      -The reason this isn't done is because of the length of the wires. The bandwidth to the video card is crucial. The longer the wires, the slower you can clock them and the lower the bandwidth. This is why you will find the AGP slot has the prime position right next to the Northbridge on most motherboards, and the slower PCI slots will be further away.

      Then I think the industry could come up with a standard cable for all cards.

      -They do, it's called AGP (or PCI Express these days).

      I could see a card that interfaces through the memory slots ( if your motherboard had enough realastate). A GPU directly connected to Hypertransport anyone?

      -Again, there is a good reason they don't do this. A memory bus is designed to connect memory, not graphics adapters. It lacks the multitude of features (most notably a suitable form of error correction/detection) to connect a graphics adapter.

  9. Water? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It could be someting other then water, like antifreeze.. Woudl be able to use a peltier block and run it even colder then you can with water.

    Or even sodium. So what if it breaks and the user dies ;)

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Water? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 3, Informative

      antifreeze conducts heat worse that water does. its possible the extra chill would be wasted by the fact less heat was being absorbed from the chip.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    2. Re:Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even sodium.

      Which is a worse coolant and solid at room temperature, nuthead.

    3. Re:Water? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Since when is a HOT cpu at room temperature?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heat sink is at room temperature. You cannot circulate a coolant that is frozen in the heat sink. Sodium melts at 98C; that's not the temperature of a HOT cpu, it's the temperature of a BROKEN cpu. And besides not working at all, sodium is still a worse coolant than water, dumbass.

    5. Re:Water? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I was going to actually respond, but after you decided to resort to name calling, decided you arent worth it.

      Try getting a life.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  10. Why water? by bogaboga · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have always wondered:

    Does it have to be water to cool these GPUs? Is it water because of its relative hight Specific Heat Capacity, or because it's cheap and readily available?

    I can see slashdotters increasing the capacity of the "tank" that stores water on these GPUs to make sure the GPU stays cool.

    1. Re:Why water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's because water is cheap and readily available. It's also non-toxic, an important consideration for overclocking types who accidentally trip over the hoses they use to run their machine 0.2% faster than stock. As for increasing the water capacity of the system, unless you're planning on increasing it to infinity it won't make any difference - at some point the water will start coming back hot unless you've got a method of cooling it in the loop. Hint: water cooling isn't magic, it's just heat transfer over long distances.

    2. Re:Why water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.2% faster eh? I know thats why I water cooled, for that extra 4mhz on my 2ghz proc. Oh, and the other 550mhz :P.

    3. Re:Why water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If more water = larger tank then you get larger surface area.
      Also, more water = longer time to reach a given temp. If the system isn't on 24/7 this could make a difference.

      Some may not be overclocking but just wants their system to be more quite and less noisy.

    4. Re:Why water? by NittanyTuring · · Score: 1

      Like the above posters said, water is readily available and non-toxic, but the high specific heat capacity certainly does help. I think the only liquid with a higher specific heat capacity is ammonia.

    5. Re:Why water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does that make your PC appreciably faster? Do a blind test - have someone flip a coin and either leave it as is or set it back to stock speed while you're not in the room. Then they leave, you come back, use the computer for a few weeks. See if you can figure it out without using benchmarks.

    6. Re:Why water? by Tarwn · · Score: 1

      Ah man, now I really want to put some watercooling on my old P4 rig. I mean, the 30% overclock is nothing compared to a 0.2% increase...

      P4 1.6a that has been running at a 30% overclock on aircooling for 3 years. It gets maybe a few hours off per year and has so far outlived a motherboard and PSU and is still running strong. Thanks for playing...

      --
      Whee signature.
  11. Too embarassing by Expert+Determination · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember when that company introduced cryogenically cooled PCs? I got one at work. It was amazing - it ran at 1GHz and I had the fastest machine in the building. But a few months later it was no longer the fastest in the building but it was definitely the dumbest machine in the building - especially with the 5 minute wait for it to cool down before booting. I won't make the same mistake with water cooled graphics cards.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
    1. Re:Too embarassing by deft · · Score: 1

      So I take it those 5 minutes to boot weren't made up during the day with your screamingly fast computer?

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:Too embarassing by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1
      So I take it those 5 minutes to boot weren't made up during the day with your screamingly fast computer?
      In CPU time yes, in psychological time no. You can imagine how it is: you get to work and want to read your email. You have to sit there waiting fof the compressor to get going and watch the temperature on the gauge slowly drop. It's a fun novelty thing for the first week or two and after that it's annoying. On the other hand, suppose I trim 5 minutes off a 1 hour fluid simulation (which is what I was doing some of the time). Am I really going to appreciate those 5 minutes? And of course I only had that benefit for a couple of months.
      --
      "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  12. Self contained and silent? by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it actually self-contained if you have to refill it?
    Is it actually silent if it still has a fan?

    I think what TF[A|S] actually ment was 'pre-fitted water-cooled ATI'

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
    1. Re:Self contained and silent? by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      A fan doing 18/26dBA at 2000/2500RPM is effectively silent.

      A pin drop is around 10db & a whisper is about 20db

      As long as you don't sleep with the tower right next to your head, I doubt it'll be an issue.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  13. Thank GOD by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny


    The last publicity pictures I saw of this card had a couple of "Models" showing it off. The blonde one looked like they had picked her up off of W124th and Lennox at about 4AM.

    Shudder.

    --
    sig?
    1. Re:Thank GOD by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      Got a link? For, you know... educational purposes...

    2. Re:Thank GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here you go.
      Needless to say X-Bit Labs rocks! They actually asked the boothbabes to pose with the hardware. Great idea, because that is the reason they are there anyway.

      http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/editorial/display /cebit2006-3_2.html

  14. Silence or? by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I looked at the pictures, my first thought was that it would not be more silent, since it still would have to move the same heat, while it might be good for overclocking. But I guess that there is a possibility of it running quietly since there are a bigger surface area for the air to move the heat than on a normal GPU cooling fan and heatsink.

    I made my own PC watercooled about 1½ year ago with the purpose to make it more silent. My idea was to cool the CPU and GPU using both passive and active cooling.
    I got a radiator from Innovatek.de for passive cooling inside and a small deep one for the inside for active cooling with a Papst fan.
    Then I got a microcontroller that can run on its own, measure the water temperature and control fans, as well a a emergency shutdown if the water gets too hot or the pump fails.
    The end result were fantastic, the PC runs almost silent when doing anything than playing games(which I don't do much anymore) but when playing games it still have the power. It manages to run mostly with passive cooling when not playing games. It is so silent that you have to look at the power LED to make sure that you have turned the PC on. When I do play games and the water starts heating up, the microcontroller starts the watercooling fan and adjusts the speed to keep the temperature down.
    On mistake that I did make was that I went into it with my usual approach of reading tons of reviews on the internet to find the best cooling CPU/GPU heads and generally getting parts from different vendors that I determined would make the best solution. Exept from the internal radiator that was deeper than any other I could find, I can now see that it didn't matter which parts I used when I was not going to do overclocking.
    It is better to stick with parts from one vendor so you don't have problems getting them to fit or work together. Like different sizes of tubes etc. Also the microcontroller from one vendor could not monitor the pump for another.

  15. Budget alternatives? by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to recommend a $100 non-AGP graphics card? I'm looking to upgrade from integrated graphics on a new system, and don't have the coin for a high-end choice. I'm not expecting to get 7800-level performance; just wondering what might offer good bang for the buck.

    --
    That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    1. Re:Budget alternatives? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      By non-AGP do you mean PCI or PCI-E?

    2. Re:Budget alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newegg, XFX 6800 XTreme.

      Yeah, you have half the normal pipelines of a regular 6800, but you did say "bang for the buck" and at right around $100 for dual digital out + 256MB PCIE, I think this qualifies. Yes, you CAN put these in SLI.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustRatingReview.asp ?DEPA=0&Type=&Item=N82E16814150130&Pagesize=100

      -theGreater.

    3. Re:Budget alternatives? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      GeForceFX 6200 256 meg 8x AGP CompUSA = 129 (I got a $20 rebate so just right at your price range, if they still offer he rebate. Not a bad card IMHO, even in my 4X AGP slot.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    4. Re:Budget alternatives? by TastelessGarbage · · Score: 1

      Either PCI or PCI-E is ok.

      --
      That ain't liver; that's beef kidney!
    5. Re:Budget alternatives? by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

      I got an ATI Radeon X1300+ for $150, it's PCI-e and it works great.

      --
      The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    6. Re:Budget alternatives? by smartsaga · · Score: 1

      6800XT (an XFX 6800 Xtreme) at newegg.com for $135.

      I just got it last week. Kicks ass with all my games at 1440x900 all settings maxed out and 4X anti-aliasing.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82 E16814150130

      Have a good one.

      --
      ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
  16. 7900GTX watercooled retail card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The EVGA GeForce 7900GTX CO 512MB Black Pearl is water-cooled, but not self-contained.

  17. Where's the bling? by Glacial+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Funny

    This card looks very boring. My quad fan card with state of the art stealth cooling fins and racing stripes looks way better. If they added some gold and diamond dust to the water to increases this cards bling I would consider buying it.

    1. Re:Where's the bling? by eebra82 · · Score: 1

      I hope I don't offend you by saying that the majority of all people buy graphics cards based on performance, features and possibly game packs. I understand that you probably have a see-through case, but the people who actually give a squat about such things is outnumbered and almost insignificant. I think the majority who buy this card expect great performance and not too much noise. Look at the size of this thing. It's not really taking up much space, so it could be a decent HTPC component!

      On the other hand, I think it's rather sad to see new cooling solutions added to graphics cards. I don't want peltiers, huge fans, big blocks of copper or whatever the engineers come to think of. I want the source of this problem to tackle it. Take the approach of Intel, to increase performance per cycle instead and make such chip mainstream and then let the rich gamers have their noise makers. :) I remember the times when a CPU was a fanless construction, and prior to that, even no heatsinks. Where's the technology going and how long do we have to wait before the Bush administration admits that the global warming effect is in fact caused by overheated computer components?

    2. Re:Where's the bling? by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      I pretty sure he was joking.

    3. Re:Where's the bling? by DigitalHammer · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Type R sticker. :)

    4. Re:Where's the bling? by leenks · · Score: 1

      You mean slashdotters have evolved the ability to make JOKES?!

  18. A little more info by Daath · · Score: 4, Informative

    On Sapphire Technologies there is a little more info, but not much.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  19. Water cooler huh? by linguizic · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe now I can play Doom 3 with the graphics settings all the way up!

    --
    Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
  20. Most obvious question: by WillerZ · · Score: 1, Informative

    What keeps the graphics RAM chips cool? Usually air is blown down onto the processor whence it goes across the RAM chip coolers.

    In the photos, the RAM chips still have cooling fins, and they're still aligned radially around the core; however, since there is no airflow there they're surely going to overheat...

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
    1. Re:Most obvious question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memory cooling fins are a total scam. They're not meaningful in any way.

    2. Re:Most obvious question: by jftitan · · Score: 1

      My best guess, would be to say, Memory wont need the cooling devices that CPU/GPUs require. As for this situation, Because the GPU doesn't have a fan to blow the hot air towards the memory, the memory themselves won't be in trouble. Most cooling fans, usually blow air towards the heat sinks, then that air gets blown to the sides where the memory resides. When all that hot air to blown towards to memory chips, then they would be in the need for the cooling element.

        Since watercooling takes the heat directly away from the GPU to a radiator, then no actual heat is transfered towards the surrounding elements (chips, transitors, or queso, and sourcream & onion)

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    3. Re:Most obvious question: by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Surely you're right and every time the company tests their prototypes crashes are a huge problem because they didn't think of this.

    4. Re:Most obvious question: by Lord+Crc · · Score: 1

      In the photos, the RAM chips still have cooling fins, and they're still aligned radially around the core; however, since there is no airflow there they're surely going to overheat...

      All I can say is that my watercooled 7800GT has the same sort of cooling fins on the RAM, low air circulation inside the case, and so far no troubles. Remember that since the GPU is not heating up the air inside the case, the air is a lot cooler.

      Main problem I can see with this card is that many case designs would have the PSU sucking the hot air this card blows out right back into the case.

    5. Re:Most obvious question: by thealsir · · Score: 0

      The memory chips also use the PCB as cooling. Since the PCB is cooler, less airflow is required over the ram chips.

      --
      Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  21. This post is too embarassing by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    Watercooling doesn't require you to wait for anything to cool down.

    1. Re:This post is too embarassing by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Watercooling doesn't require you to wait for anything to cool down.

      Yes, your post is very embarassing indeed. The parent was obviously talking about the systems with built-in phase change cooling (e.g. Prometia) which do take several minutes to get down to the right temperature.

      But because you've never heard of those, you assumed he was talking about water cooling and made a tit of yourself flaming him.

      It's pretty hard to think of anything more embarassing than that.

  22. Re:And the really funny thing is... by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Once you get past a certain number of frames per second, it doesn't freaking matter. It's not going to one bit more for the quality of the experience.

  23. They grow up so fast by Joebert · · Score: 1

    One day, graphics cards will be able to do soo much on their own, they won't even want me to play the game with them anymore.

    They grow up soo fast. =P

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  24. External PCI-X connector-KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I think it is about time to start thinking about the GPU as a device, like a cd-rom or harrdrive instead of a card."

    Do you feel the same way about your processor?

    "They already require an external power supply in some cases, and with SLI are using a special type of connector."

    PCIe doesn't require an extra connector.

    "I'd like to see a GPU that comes in the form of a 5.25 bay expansion, with a pci-x card that connects it via a cable to the mobo."

    Violates the KISS principle.

    "Then I think the industry could come up with a standard cable for all cards. Or not, given that nvidia or whoever could come up with just about anything. I could see a card that interfaces through the memory slots ( if your motherboard had enough realastate). A GPU directly connected to Hypertransport anyone?"

    Nvidia already has on-board video.

    The smartests thing is ASUS's putting the GPU on the OTHER side of the PCB, even if it violates the specs.

  25. Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by mOOzilla · · Score: 1

    Why do ATI give Mobile chipsets the finger? Acer is one OEM that is not supported in their mobility, why can NV provide Unified driver sets and ATI cannot, is it too technical for ATI? ATI as usual, let down their end users by drivers in favour of OEM's. Money from OEM's, Finger to the end user. My next laptop is a dual core AMD but most likely they will be ATI mobility chipsets and as such if it is Acer im screwed out of the box.

    1. Re:Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by mOOzilla · · Score: 1

      I can only get ATI 4.x to work modded on my Acer 9700 Ferrari, the 6.x drivers mod but do not work, BLANK SCREEN. And anyway, that only fixes the effect, not the cause.

    3. Re:Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by modemboy · · Score: 1

      Try omega drivers:
      http://omegadrivers.net/ati/win2k_xp.php

      Workd great with my x220m.

      But I agree with you that the drivers for laptop gpu's are horribly managed. Unless I misunderstand you, nv isn't any better, their unified drivers are only for desktop and a few highend laptop gpus, most laptop chipsets are stuck with manufacturer provided drivers, as is my HP laptop with ATI x200m so I think Acer is not the only one...

    4. Re:Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by mOOzilla · · Score: 1

      Omega makes some games not work, Tribes 2 for example :)

    5. Re:Pitty ATI do not support Acer laptops by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Unless I misunderstand you, nv isn't any better, their unified drivers are only for desktop and a few highend laptop gpus

      No - it is only ATI that pull this shit. Don't let anyone convince you that it is normal. You can always workaround the issue by making sure you don't buy a laptop with an ATI chipset. Then you wouldn't have to use hacked drivers just to get it working.

  26. A very ugly worst-case scenario... by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 0

    Remember that spate of stories we were getting about the new 1000W = 1KW power supply units [PSUs]?

    Here are a few of them:

    New 1 Kilowatt PSU - Too Much Power?
    Monday, August 22, 2005
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/ 22/2157244

    Thirty Four PSUs Tested - Is Biggest Best?
    Monday, September 26, 2005
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/ 26/1052233

    A Kilowatt of Power
    Wednesday December 28, 2005
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/12/ 28/0353252

    Now consider, for example, the specs on the PC Power & Cooling Turbo-Cool® 1KW PSU:
    Turbo-Cool® 1KW Power Supply Specifications
    Current: 15A @ 115V
    WARNING: PDF DOCUMENT
    http://www.pcpowercooling.com/products/assets/TC1K W/specs.pdf
    Now suppose three things:
    1) You're a l33t gamer, and you install a PC Power & Cooling Turbo-Cool® 1KW PSU, drawing 15 Amps @ 115V, and

    2) You're a l33t gamer, and you install a Sapphire Graphics Water Cooled Radeon X1900, and

    3) Your water-cooled Radeon springs a leak.

    Okay, now do like Sponge Bob and Patrick in the box, and use your I-M-A-G-I-N-A-T-I-O-N, keeping in mind how Death was stalking Chad Donella's character in Final Destination I:
    INT. WAGGNER HOUSEHOLD. BATHROOM. NIGHT. Tod picks up a razor and puts it to his face to shave. The water begins to leak from the toilet and slowly makes its way to where Tod is standing. He puts the razor to his face and instantly cuts himself. In the mirror?s reflection, a black mist floats across. Tod spins around. Nothing there. The water edged closer. Tod puts the razor down and picks up scissors instead and begins to cut the hairs from his nose. He then picks up a plug, thinking it?s the electric razor but it turns out to be the radio. The water edges closer to Tod?s feet. He?s unaware but pulls the radio plug out in time. He moves away from the mirror but the leak follows him.

    http://www.allstarz.org/~final/transcriptdoc.htm

    PS: I assume the folks at "Sapphire Graphics" have never heard of this thing called The Association of Trial Lawyers of America...
    1. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wtf are you babbling about? How many fucking watts is an electric oven? Don't know? Thousands. What the fuck do I boil on my stove? Water, idiot. I don't care how much wattage you have a 12V, the max a PC power supply puts out, it won't hurt you. And the 110V/220V feed (depending on where you live) is always there in a 50W or 1KW power supply. What about an electric trolling motor for a boat? OMFG!! How many watts is a car battery capable of that you leave outside in the rain? Sorry for the flame, but you're just fucking stupid. Jump into the bath with your toaster.

    2. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by moro_666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      you obviously have never touched the wires of the 'safe 12v' car electricity system when you're starting the engine, go try it out, i promise it will be fun. probably not lethal, but fun enough.

        but you're right about the ovens and cars, if they are built the right way, it won't really be dangerous to you, but then again, you don't beat the battery connections in the car or the wiring of the oven when you miss a frag do you ?

        the electric cow fences run at a moderatly low voltage, but the current strenth in it so large that if you touch it with bare hand, you'll remember it for the rest of your life (i remember it pretty well :s). if currents inside the computer continue the rise, we have to find methods to make the connections safer.

        i on the other hand am looking around for machines with mobile cpu's or even built ontop of the via or transmeta cpu's, because the eletricity bills are starting to get really large if you have a lot of boxes running and an alternative must be found. sure the via cpu can't do what amd or intel does, but 3 boxes of via will do better on my threaded stuff than 1 p4 box, and will consume less energy at the same time. for a quite and economical multiprocess server machine , a 4 way via or transmeta box would be much much better than a stupid p4 box which takes more energy and does less.

        ofcourse gamers will continue on the gigahertz race unless somebody totally redefines the 3d engines in the way that it can be run on many many economical cpu's instead of one that blows your fuses.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    3. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by Tolookah · · Score: 1

      " the electric cow fences run at a moderatly low voltage, but the current strenth in it so large that if you touch it with bare hand, you'll remember it for the rest of your life (i remember it pretty well :s). if currents inside the computer continue the rise, we have to find methods to make the connections safer."

      if the current was high, you'd be dead, its a high voltage line, with current limiting circuits to not kill things. yeah, you could do it the other way by having it a high current with limiting voltages, but well, 100mA will kill someone if applied right.

      if high voltages killed people, shag carpets would be illegal due to the static buildup.

      As for the rest of your post, some processors nowadays do step down their speeds when they aren't in use to save power. Also, a 1KW PSU will not always draw the max wattage, it depends on the load inside (like starting up a drive)

    4. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by moro_666 · · Score: 1

      electric fences for the cows in the ussr didn't really have any protective measures, i can promise you that. ofcourse it wasn't deadly, my post wouldn't be here if that would be the case.

        and from the eager time of my youth, repairing of home electronics, i can also tell that this wasn't nowhere as 'harmless' as a regular shot from a 220v line. that fence hurt as hell and definetly leaved a blue trace for at least a month on my arm. maybe it really was high voltage mixed with weak current, but it certainly didn't feel like ac. and all the safety claims for the 12v computer lines here presume that the hardware&electronics work correctly, but if you've got a 1kw fuse and something goes wrong (and according to murphy it does), you should know that 100mA@12V isn't always the case.

        ps. as for the rest of your comment, the cpus suck at stepping down if they get peak loads over 5 second intervals for 1 second. it's a hopeless attempt to up/downscale a server cpu if the server is used in similar style to one that a http server would be used. peak there , peak here, stepping just wont cut it. ofcourse in laptops it works fine, i give you an A on this one.
        but on servers you need something that keeps itself down on the wattage drainage all the time and still manages to do the work. i think the person who administrates google network electricity bill would agree too ;)

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    5. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrocute

      100 V measured across the human heart can kill.

      meaning if you stick two of your fingers across a car battery, you might be safe, but if you use both hands, you could die.

      Not that you should try that.

      Nevertheless, putting water, electricity, and flammable materials in the same space is very dangerous, and any lawyer can spin that into a multi-dodacadewhateverploillion monetary-unit-of-your-choice verdict. As the person you responded to pointed out.

      The idea of a water-cooled piece of computer equipment is dangerous, and "Performance" should come second in any endeavor like that.

      TAKE NOTE THAT
      the article says it's "liquid-cooled"...

      but the slashdot headline says "water."

      this is how controversies are born, ladies and gentlemen...

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    6. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      to get a dangerous current through the body without going to implanted electrodes you need a high enough voltage. 12V simply isn't sufficiant to do this (note however that some parts of a cars electric system are at far more than 12V the ignition system contains a step up transformer).

      static shocks are high voltage and high current but very short duration and so do not have enough total energy to do any real damage.

      i think electric fences also generally work on the short duration shock principle (it gives plenty of pain with little risk of harm). its possible the ones in the USSR were rather cruder and/or set higher than the ones we see in the west though)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Actually, just sitting in a tub of water with a toaster is likely not to hurt you. Only if you become the shortest path to ground (IE get out of tub). Else the power will just arc in the toaster (just where the power cord is soldered into the board)

      I think. No, I won't test it out :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:A very ugly worst-case scenario... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why do you assume they will be putting electrolyte in the water?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  27. Budget alternatives?-Videocard DB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    A handy database for those shopping for a videocard.

  28. ATI need to refocus their design... by mOOzilla · · Score: 1

    ...onto more efficient chips rather than just bolting on cooling to the problem. That goes for the entire processor industry too.

  29. But does it run...The $1 jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot jokes have one thing in common with the hole drilled in the girl's locker room wall. It's all about a cheap thrill.

    1. Re:But does it run...The $1 jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about a cheap thrill

      And your point is???

    2. Re:But does it run...The $1 jokes. by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Cheap thrill? You clearly weren't the guy who drilled the hole.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  30. Seems an odd design? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always thought the problem with cooling a PC was in getting the heat OUT of the PC case. Air can be a good cooler but the problem is that it is so hard to direct the cold air in and the hot air out. Escpecially in a PC case wich is usually cramped and filled with great big walls wich block the airflow.

    CUE watercooling wich takes the heat via the water outside of the case where you can have a slow unobstructed fan get rid of the heat.

    Almost every design I seen always gets the hot water out of the case to be cooled down by large unobstructed fans.

    Yet this setup seems to pump the water from the hot graphics card to a spare PCI slot in your PC where the fan will be blowing the heat away right inside your computer.

    If you unlucky right back onto your gpu.

    To be efficient the cooler would have to be outside your case, with the water cables coming out of the back of the gpu and the cooler not having a PCI mounting but something that is easily attached to your case.

    It is not the first time I seen this mistake, people put the nicest fans inside their case but never spend any time considering that all that does is blow the hot air around if you do not somehow setup a flow to carry it out. Oh and another to get cool air back in.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Seems an odd design? by Theobon · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is how this works. It also has the advantage that it doesn't have the radiator outside the case. The radiator sits in a spare pci slot cooling down the water and blowing the hot air right out the case. The biggest problem I have had with cooling video cards is that cases were not designed to move air through the video card and thus the fan just blows air into either the powersupply or another card and then sucking it in agian. It creates hots spots in the case to the point that I can have a 20C temperature gradiant in the case. This fixes that by moving the heat directly outside the case. I don't know where it is getting the fresh air from though. My guess is it is from inside the case which is dissapointing as that will be hotter than outside air but it will still be better than my current settup.
      This isn't designed to replace full water cooling rigs which would be better but it does bring water cooling benifits to those that don't feel safe building there own.

  31. Hot Hardware... by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1

    Is this some sort of lame pun?

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    1. Re:Hot Hardware... by cciRRus · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I haven't read the article, but does it really hold water? Or all the good stuff they have said, are just hot air?

      --
      w00t
  32. another use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tight spaces that don't allow enough airflow is a definate use. There's a Shuttle box with an SLI setup that I love the specs on, I became a serious Shuttle fan after building one recently. The downside is all the reviews love it but point out overheading issues if you use one of the video card slots even if it's in a single card configuration. One of these cards could solve the problem.

  33. No clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how some of you guys are all so pious and complain. Do you sit in front of your machines all day with nothing better to do than rip on slashdot posts?

    I actually know the folks over at HotHardware and their content is typically pretty strong, and I know their host setup as well, dedicated front end servers and database servers.

    Yep the slashdotting like that is pretty tough for any server to handle sometimes but at least they have a lot of good content on a dynamically generated site that easier to navigate than most out there.

    1. Re:No clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just think their articles tend to suck. I'd rather /. pick other sources for stories.

  34. Your water cooling system needs to be better too. by temojen · · Score: 1

    Check out this picture. It looks like it just dumps the heat inside your case... great...

  35. 1 card, 3 slots... by rtechie · · Score: 1

    That was my first reaction. This thing eats up a lot of room in a case, more than an SLI rig I would think (which strikes me as the competitor). Are you better off with this or with 2 X1600s in CrossFire?

    1. Re:1 card, 3 slots... by GeekDork · · Score: 1

      A properly cooled SLI rig would use four slots... Those thin stock coolers are (1) loud as hell and (2) don't work.

      --

      Fight hunger. Filet a politician and send him to a 3rd world country of your choice.

  36. Transparent fans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read on Silentpc.com that transparent plastic makes more noise than opaque plastic. Graphics card makers should use opaque plastic and large fans to keep the noise down.

    1. Re:Transparent fans by 16777216 · · Score: 0

      Yup...
      That's 'cause the noisy fariy-elves don't like see-through things and avoid them like pop-corn!!

      --
      I am. Lower your shields and power down your weapons, they are useless. Your biological and technological distinctivenes
  37. Re:Your water cooling system needs to be better to by NeMon'ess · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Look again. It dumps half the heat in the case, and blows the other half out. That's the sacrifice for a near-silent, 2-slot water cooled solution. If the cooler card took up 2 slots by itself I'm sure the fan could blow the air out the back. But then that's 3 slots total. The 120mm case fan(s) should handle this card just fine.

  38. Won't overclock for diddly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you MAY get the GPU up some, but who cares when your memory has NO HEATSINK AT ALL!

  39. Who can see who by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Overclock all you want and you are still playing the same game as everyone else.

    If I can see you but you can't see me, are we really playing the same game?

    If I can turn and point faster than you can, are we still playing the same game?

    That's the whole point behind the video card race, and why I went to console gaming. Becuase at least there, more people are indeed playing the same game (not as true now that some people play in HD and some not).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Re:Your water cooling system needs to be better to by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1
    Look again. It dumps half the heat in the case, and blows the other half out.
    I don't even think it does that. That looks like a standard laptop CPU fan, which sucks air in at both sides, and sends it out in a disc from the blades, absent any directing plastic bits. It looks like a standard squirrelcage fan, which will blow all the air out the back of the slot. As a bonus, it gets some hot air out of your PC case, too.
    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  41. Re:Your water cooling system needs to be better to by NeMon'ess · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Some jackass modded me redundant, which I wasn't, so I'll post again with more info. From Sapphire's Press Release:
    Air is extracted from the case by an integral transparent blue LED fan, passed through the radiator and vented out of the case at the rear mounting bracket.

    As you can see from the other photos, one end of the cooler vents out of the case while the other end is closed.
  42. slower to warm... slower to cool by ianalis · · Score: 1

    I would like to remind everyone that the reason why water or whatever fluid is inside it helps cool down the card is because of its high heat capacity. This also means that its slower to cool it down when it's already very hot.

    1. Re:slower to warm... slower to cool by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      Poor conclusion. The high heat capacity allows for lots of heat transer, in either direction. Without enough information about the copper waterblock and radiator on the cooling end you cannot make an assuption that it will cool slower. Simply this all depends on the design performance.

  43. An AC on AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC current doesn't just arc inside something. Because the current is going back and forth, it makes charged waves in whatever medium the wire is touching.

    This is why downed power lines are so dangerous. If they were DC, they'd just hit the ground and spark, possibly lighting whatever they hit on fire, but otherwise not particularly threatening anyone. You'd have to touch one to be hurt.

    A downed AC power line, though, pushes electrons out and then pulls electrons in. This makes a kind of ripple of alternating positive and negative charge radiating out from the point where the line is touching the ground. There is an actual voltage difference in the earth itself around an AC line.

    If your right foot is further from the wire than your left foot, you become the shortest path for this voltage. You're a better conductor than the ground is. The current arcs out of the ground, up through you, and back into the ground.

    I know this is the case for downed lines. I would assume the danger of a toaster in the bath is the same. Your body, being full of salts, is a better conductor than the bathwater. There are voltage differences within the bathwater, and parts of your body become shorts for these differences.

    1. Re:An AC on AC by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i'd imagine it would depend on the bath. If the bath and the waste plumbing plastic you'd probablly get away with it. The bath water would oscilate in potential but you would just ride up and down with it and i can't imagine there would be any significant current outside the toasters case.

      now if there are other paths out of the bath for electricity thats when things could really get nasty especially if the toaster didn't have an earthed metal case.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  44. Re:And the really funny thing is... by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

    Not exactly true. Anyone who's ever played a shooter can tell you that your FPS mileage may vary depending on what's going on around you. If you're running at 40 FPS when there's two guys on screen, but 20 FPS when they start shooting, the game ends up being choppy during fire-fights and that could get you killed.

    Case-in-point, I saw an Anandtech review of some new hotness video cards and they tested F.E.A.R. on the highest settings, and they averaged about 50 FPS, until some explosions went off and their framerate dropped to zero. Having more FPS means that when shit happens, you don't take a hit that will kill your experience.

    Granted, that doesn't justify buying an expensive-as-a-game-console video card.