Since its publication, it has been acclaimed all over the world by thinkers as diverse as Sigmund Freud,[2] Albert Einstein,[3] Ludwig Wittgenstein,[4] Martin Heidegger,[5] Cormac McCarthy,[6] Kurt Vonnegut[7] and Pope Benedict XVI[8] as one of the supreme achievements in literature.
Yeah, the Pope is really into novels that trash religion.
But the problem with this whole "internal locus of control" meme is that it's false. You cannot control having a job. You can control how well you do it, but even people doing a good job can get fired by assholes. We cannot control reality.
However, if you consider that a large part of perception is really projection,
Take a look at the Bacteria flagellum. You'll see a full motor inside of it. 27 unique parts that none can have a purpose outside of it being an entire motor.
I'll see your Michael Behe and raise you some scientists who actually understand evolution.
(Darwin stated in his own theory that if it could be proven someday that there is some irreducible complexity of an organism, that his theory would fall apart. That has been found.)
Cite please. And in any event, saying "God did it" is not an explanation.
When you take what we know today, the reason stands that there is something that has brought everything into existence with intelligence. You must now deny the evidence that there is God by providing it. There is proof that there is intelligent design behind everything.
Intelligence is the awareness of antecedent facts; intelligence presupposes existence, not the other way around.
The difference between the two (on multiple machines, across multiple versions, with multiple operating systems) is that on a system with 12gb of RAM and one to two dozen tabs (just averaging, here), Firefox grinds to a halt.
I have 25 tabs open with only 3 gb of physical RAM. I also have 6 gb of swap, very little of which is being hit.
I just found etherape, which can display download speed graphically.
Why would Kevin Costner do that?
Yes. I have her rendition of "The Star-Spangled Banner" on the official CD. I also like her cover of Chaka Khan's "I'm Every Woman".
Nor on OpenSuSe 11.4. But using ethertool isn't going to help, as it isn't even in the repos. :-(
Did it really mean to trash religion?
According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brothers_Karamazov
Since its publication, it has been acclaimed all over the world by thinkers as diverse as Sigmund Freud,[2] Albert Einstein,[3] Ludwig Wittgenstein,[4] Martin Heidegger,[5] Cormac McCarthy,[6] Kurt Vonnegut[7] and Pope Benedict XVI[8] as one of the supreme achievements in literature.
Yeah, the Pope is really into novels that trash religion.
Did the German government as a whole get to discuss the treaty?
Dostoevsky
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Fyodor_Dostoevsky
The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.
But the Acton quote is also correct
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Lord_Acton
The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free is the amount of security enjoyed by minorities.
Given that there is only one command to move/rename a file, what would you call it? You could always do
cd /bin
ln -s mv ren
Why does an app need to "expect" multiple desktops? What compatibility problems?
Even if it is a crude hack, is it worse than not having it?
I can't use LaTeX on the computers at work, either, but you'll get my laptop copy when you pry my cold, dead hands off it.
I may be using ethertool, but I only have to type ifconfig.
Multitasking is sort of prevented but most people,
Except that Unix has multiple consoles.
But that's not how my mind works.
Why doesn't it work that way?
and in my mind, a location in the file system is a folder.
Files are locations in file systems. They're where the bytes are.
Bullshit. I created my own job. I have control over my own life.
Until nobody buys your product.
Which is why people who take responsibility for their own lives and future succeed, and those who blame everything on everyone else fail.
Do you have any data on this? George W. Bush seemed to blame other people, but he succeeded.
But the problem with this whole "internal locus of control" meme is that it's false. You cannot control having a job. You can control how well you do it, but even people doing a good job can get fired by assholes. We cannot control reality.
However, if you consider that a large part of perception is really projection,
That does apply to your own perception?
You've been reading too much Onion
http://www.theonion.com/articles/microsoft-patents-ones-zeroes,599
That doesn't spell anything. How do you expect people to pronounce "POICTPKP"?
Now, Ably Protecting People from Listening Erroneously to Popular Internet Entertainment. What US politician is going to oppose APPLEPIE?
Not the University of Colorado at Boulder?
The part I cited was in the article.
and urged citizens to use Windows' Auto Update feature to keep their PCs abreast of all OS security fixes.
Windows Update can apply Linux kernel fixes? Damn, I'm impressed!!
Perhaps the GP posted anonymously because of a previous moderation?
Take a look at the Bacteria flagellum. You'll see a full motor inside of it. 27 unique parts that none can have a purpose outside of it being an entire motor.
I'll see your Michael Behe and raise you some scientists who actually understand evolution.
http://www.talkdesign.org/faqs/icdmyst/ICDmyst.html#bactflag
(Darwin stated in his own theory that if it could be proven someday that there is some irreducible complexity of an organism, that his theory would fall apart. That has been found.)
Cite please. And in any event, saying "God did it" is not an explanation.
When you take what we know today, the reason stands that there is something that has brought everything into existence with intelligence. You must now deny the evidence that there is God by providing it. There is proof that there is intelligent design behind everything.
Intelligence is the awareness of antecedent facts; intelligence presupposes existence, not the other way around.
Unless every read does a checksum ( they don't or it would kill performance )
How does that relate to using the journal checksum option on ext4?
The difference between the two (on multiple machines, across multiple versions, with multiple operating systems) is that on a system with 12gb of RAM and one to two dozen tabs (just averaging, here), Firefox grinds to a halt.
I have 25 tabs open with only 3 gb of physical RAM. I also have 6 gb of swap, very little of which is being hit.
I wasn't claiming that those cities didn't deserve it.