You post on Slashdot and can't think of a reason why? iPhones with GPS help updating Apple's database by reporting precise information about nearby routers to Apple's database. Now you don't want your phone to report the same information over and over and over again. Like my phone sending exactly where my neighbours' routers are every five minutes. And all the routers on my way to work twice every day. So how do you avoid this? You keep a list of known locations that you have sent, and don't send that information again.
Why would an iPhone need to know about routers? Doesn't it use 3G?
Hmm, if I remember corectly, the philosophy would be that it is too bad if you don't want someone to link to your text, that should not be your decision to make.
But that isn't the issue. Current HTML allows linking to text. What I asked about was two-way linking, which I guess is different. As for the technical issues of two-way linking, how does it deal with 404?
For instance, he discussed that links embedded into documents are a bad idea because they get broken and can only be placed there by the owner of the document. He discusses that links should always be two-way.
What if the owner of a document doesn't want two-way linking? And as others have asked, how do you implement two-way linking?
If an idea is not falsifiable, it is by definition not science.
That may be fine with universal claims, but what about existential claims? We have Newton's Third Law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Slashdot Mirror
Doesn' s eem to be a problem on my phone. And how can you triangulate cell towers with a single phone?
As opposed to the hivemind opinion that Apple can do no wrong?
Of course, the opposite is true. You could leave your phone somewhere to provide evidence that you were there, rather than the crime scene.
You post on Slashdot and can't think of a reason why? iPhones with GPS help updating Apple's database by reporting precise information about nearby routers to Apple's database. Now you don't want your phone to report the same information over and over and over again. Like my phone sending exactly where my neighbours' routers are every five minutes. And all the routers on my way to work twice every day. So how do you avoid this? You keep a list of known locations that you have sent, and don't send that information again. Why would an iPhone need to know about routers? Doesn't it use 3G?
So Indian schools are no better at teaching English than American schools?
Because there's more to life than striking it rich?
Perhaps something was impeding his understanding?
Ayn Rand made a mistake because she was only human, despite what some randroids may think.
Or she may have wanted the royalties
But how much does it cost Google to get that revenue?
Correcting apostrophe errors on Slashdot is, in the words of Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now, like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.
Does he know that Barnes and Noble has its own e-reader? Or that Amazon had one before the iPad?
So Internet Explorer supports MathML?
But that isn't the issue. Current HTML allows linking to text. What I asked about was two-way linking, which I guess is different. As for the technical issues of two-way linking, how does it deal with 404?
What if the owner of a document doesn't want two-way linking? And as others have asked, how do you implement two-way linking?
The math part of the Harvard test looks harder.
Did Harvard even teach astronomy in 1642?
Do you realize that people could typeset entire books with two-sided justification in the 1860s?
That's why you have a solar-powered calculator as a backup.
No. Portable document format file lacks the redundancy of automated teller machine machine.
Does the law say that it holds everywhere, or somewhere. The former, that's why it's a universal law.
It isn't infinite?
But the laws of gravity are not existential claims. How can you falsify something that requires an infinite search?
But to fail to find the equal but opposite force might require an infinite search ("you can't prove a negative").
Or this
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109127/
If an idea is not falsifiable, it is by definition not science.
That may be fine with universal claims, but what about existential claims? We have Newton's Third Law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.