There is no way to suppress this even if they were to somehow take down all of wikileaks.
They can't take it down completely, Wikileaks will always be availuble by IP address, but like the bank people, they will go after the domain. Wikileaks really needs to transfer the domain to a "safe" registrar.
What legal expenses? The reason for the injunction in the first place was that they did not answer the case.
Not entirely accurate as to how it transpired. But in any case, the key words in your quote are: The reason for the injunction in the first place...
Clearly as the case progressed there where legal expenses. In the end, it turns out Baer had no case, at least to where they filed their legal action. So it was "frivolous", yes? Therefore they should pay the legal expenses.
100 years from now. Do you thing proprietary software has a chance in hell? It just is not sustainable to have every business, school, and government paying 1 provider of software for an operating system.
Holy Mother of Gary Gygax! Are you for real?
Proprietary software will be around as long as smart coders figure out they can live higher on the economical ladder by commercializing ("charging for") their creations. We don't live in a socialist utopia, and we will NEVER live in a socialist utopia.
Of course it's bullshit. But what is eNom to do? They are in the same spot as any other American company. What we should be doing electing politicians that have the sanity to ignore the screeching Cuban expats in Miami, and scrap the embargo, which if anything only keeps the Castro Brothers in power.
But, this travel company has learned another lesson: Don't buy domains from eNom, they suck in so many ways....
Board late in first class (assuming an aircraft boarding through a door forward of that cabin) and you're likely to find a fraction of the overhead bin space occupied by F passenger bags, and the remainder occupied by coach passenger bags.
I can assure you that coach baggageis not stowed in First Class. It certainly would never displace First Class luggage. Never ever. When I pay a $1000 premium for my seat, you can safely bet my carry-on is stowed directly above my head (except my jacket, which is hung on a hanger in the coat closet).
That research lab at Alberta is know for releasing under-researched findings before complete testing is applied.
Is it? The parent is "insightful" for making unsubstantiated accusations of acodemic impropriety with their research, yet provides no links or another kind of support, yet it's "insightful"?
The question is rather like those proposed by./ readers who wonder if "Slashdot" is not being inconsistent when there are multiple, often contradictory, opinions offered - by slashdot users - on various topics (patents, copyright... ).
Not at all. Wikipedia is an on-line encyclopedia, which to be taken seriously as an on-line encyclopedia needs to be strictly NPOV. Getting involved in local politics is not NPOV.
Something I haven't seen here and will probably be wildly explained away, is: Is it Wikipedia's place to be a forum for news reporting and political social change? Is that outside the scope of an "encyclopedia"? Is this type of content really relevant is an encyclopedic article on Florence?
Obviously it's a conflict of interest for the mayor of Florence, but how is it relevant in an encyclopedic article on Florence?
If Wikipedia wants to include this type of political activism the will have to accept the consistences.
But the summary goes a little far. The soldiers aren't limited to what blogs they can read. It simply limits which ones they can register for and/or post info.
Here at McChord, that's not true in a practical sense. They filter for key words in the URL such as "blog" and "webmail" and several others. Also, spacific sites *are* blocked, while "friendly" blogs may not be. Also, well known proxies are blocked, as are most p2p, torrent, mp3, and other media sites.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm sorry, but if when setting up server services the admin "forgets" to lock down FTP, they need to be canned. That is all. NEXT.
The IT labor "shortage" is a profit issue.
Clearly as the case progressed there where legal expenses. In the end, it turns out Baer had no case, at least to where they filed their legal action. So it was "frivolous", yes? Therefore they should pay the legal expenses.
IANAL.
Can Wikileaks recover any legal expenses?
Did someone get ahold of an old Popular Mechanics or something?
But, this travel company has learned another lesson: Don't buy domains from eNom, they suck in so many ways....
Obviously it's a conflict of interest for the mayor of Florence, but how is it relevant in an encyclopedic article on Florence?
If Wikipedia wants to include this type of political activism the will have to accept the consistences.
I ignorant of the organizational relationship, but a friend of mine is Washington Air Guard, and attached to these people at McChord.
At least that's my experience here.
From what I can tell here at McChord, the filter for key words in the URL. "blog", "webmail", and so on.
I work for the Air Force, both state-side and at deployed locations, and have not seen any message traffic on this at all...