I have been using SELinux on my homeserver without having to do any custom rules. I would imagine that if I was using it as a pure server, and not also as a MythtTV terminal, it would work even better.
There is no good solution to this problem -- that fixing something makes it easier to find old problems. At some point, users need to be responsible enough to apply updates.
I doh know. I disagree. Taxes deprive me of cash. I don't really consider myself a victim to the tax man though.. even though I am paying three taxes (/me grumbles)
Ubuntu can take over market wise, however, doing so will divert funds away and directly hurt Linux and Linux based OSS. Because Canonical (normally) looks after Canonical. RedHat codes for all.
Is not like RedHat isn't already spending money on the "Linux Desktop". Or do you think all those fancy stuff people from @redhat.com write and find their way to the Ubuntu desktop get all reinvented and rewritten from scratch. Fedora is free to the user, but not to RedHat.
Ubuntu is okay and all that, but I believe that RedHat does more than their fair share for the community. If they feel they don't have enough resources reaming to package a proper desktop distro, then so be it. If Ubuntu people want to use this as a reason to kill of RedHat, then I hope they are poised to feel both their own position in the community AND RedHat's
If this is true, could the editors please alter the article title accordingly? Or at least point directly to the above comment? These articles get indexed.
Forgetting for awhile the obvious play on words when naming OOXML. How can both OOXML and ODF exist? They seem to be analogous to two trees planted in the same area, competing for resources. OOXML, coming from Microsoft, regardless of its flaws, has quite a head start and will simply kill off ODF. It isn't as if they both start on the same footing and so the better standard would win.
The chances of Microsoft implementing any changes ISO makes is slim to none. And no business or government agency is going to (collectively) believe that Microsoft doesn't follow its own "international standard". Which means that OO.org, Koffice, Abiword, etc all need to follow the Microsoft way, as some have already begun to do.
Capitalism is an extremely powerful force. It empowers the powerful and takes full advantage of those willing to simply follow. You may not like communism, but it didn't lose to capitalism because it was weak.
Is that registrars have don't care who has a domain. They will happily forget to send you an email and have your domain expire and sell it to a spammer.
Slashdot Mirror
I have been using SELinux on my homeserver without having to do any custom rules. I would imagine that if I was using it as a pure server, and not also as a MythtTV terminal, it would work even better.
Major difference? Well I can't enumerate them, but I can generalize things you'll see in Fedora compared to Ubuntu
There is no good solution to this problem -- that fixing something makes it easier to find old problems. At some point, users need to be responsible enough to apply updates.
From the outside, it looks like a company that hates you was dragged kicking and screaming to come and help?talk to you
I doh know. I disagree. Taxes deprive me of cash. I don't really consider myself a victim to the tax man though.. even though I am paying three taxes (/me grumbles)
By wanting you to use a secure browser that works on your platform?
Spanked by Ubuntu? Is Ubuntu selling a server product? Because I don't think RedHat is selling a desktop product.
Ubuntu can take over market wise, however, doing so will divert funds away and directly hurt Linux and Linux based OSS. Because Canonical (normally) looks after Canonical. RedHat codes for all.
This isn't a one way street. Windows doesn't have many of the apps that I need either.
Is not like RedHat isn't already spending money on the "Linux Desktop". Or do you think all those fancy stuff people from @redhat.com write and find their way to the Ubuntu desktop get all reinvented and rewritten from scratch. Fedora is free to the user, but not to RedHat.
Ubuntu is okay and all that, but I believe that RedHat does more than their fair share for the community. If they feel they don't have enough resources reaming to package a proper desktop distro, then so be it. If Ubuntu people want to use this as a reason to kill of RedHat, then I hope they are poised to feel both their own position in the community AND RedHat's
I think they mean COMMERCIAL desktop
If this is true, could the editors please alter the article title accordingly? Or at least point directly to the above comment? These articles get indexed.
I like MySQL, I have no real issues with it. But if it's going closed source, I say let it be. Time to put energy behind Postgresql
... let this one go.
Forgetting for awhile the obvious play on words when naming OOXML. How can both OOXML and ODF exist? They seem to be analogous to two trees planted in the same area, competing for resources. OOXML, coming from Microsoft, regardless of its flaws, has quite a head start and will simply kill off ODF. It isn't as if they both start on the same footing and so the better standard would win.
Well if you want to talk objectivity, then how do a few pixels prove anything to you?
African-Americans have more grants and scholarships available to them than whites of equal economic status.
I thought the topic was about African-American in the US and was based on collected statistics? How am I offtopic?
Use these statistics to raise the usual USA fear of racism. You'd think that the US was the only place to have slaves in its history -- get over it.
So you're saying color travels further than odor?
The chances of Microsoft implementing any changes ISO makes is slim to none. And no business or government agency is going to (collectively) believe that Microsoft doesn't follow its own "international standard". Which means that OO.org, Koffice, Abiword, etc all need to follow the Microsoft way, as some have already begun to do.
Capitalism is an extremely powerful force. It empowers the powerful and takes full advantage of those willing to simply follow. You may not like communism, but it didn't lose to capitalism because it was weak.
Kill all bot nets. Seriously. And have companies who sell operating system take some financial responsibility for future security.
I didn't say GoDaddy was at issue.
Is that registrars have don't care who has a domain. They will happily forget to send you an email and have your domain expire and sell it to a spammer.