Slashdot Mirror


African Americans and the Video Game Industry

An anonymous reader writes "African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites, yet only 2% of game developers are black. This past week, MTV's Multiplayer blog interviewed five black game industry professionals for their perspective on race in the industry. Intelligent Gamer summarizes and highlights portions of this lengthy series of interviews."

646 comments

  1. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really?

    Who cares?

    I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity.

    And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"?

    1. Re:Who cares? by spintriae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? No. Can you point out where in the article any African-Dane was referred to as an African-American?
    2. Re:Who cares? by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know, but there was a Danish documentary on the subject.

    3. Re:Who cares? by athdemo · · Score: 1

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"?
      Sure you could, if he was an American citizen.
    4. Re:Who cares? by explosivejared · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the proper term is jorka-borka-ellthing-jafrikaner-schmorker. However, I always did do poorly in Danish class. Either way, I am a fan of affirmative action. It helped quell the riots in the seventies. Ask yourself, what could be worse for your MMO than a pissed off black panther guild?

      [Eldridge Cleaver Tone] We grind and we grind all day long only to have our gold stolen from us by these white pig 'developers'. They are afraid of an empowered, 31337 black guild. They are afraid of a dark Azeroth![/Eldridge Cleaver Tone]

      Promote African-American programmers! Save Azeroth!

      --
      I got a catholic block.
    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're the race playing the most games then it would seem to me it doesnt really matter what race is making the games? Is this percentage going to increase just because another member of the same races makes the games? So i guess, who cares? Should we be telling them to get a job instead of gaming or something? That doesnt sound very nice.

    6. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Oblig Maddox. Read and agree, or read and be wrong.
    7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also could if (s)he wasn't.

      But that's beside the point. What the GP (not me, I'm a different AC) meant was whether it'd make *sense* to do so. And that certainly is valid question.

      Is a dark-skinned person that was born in Denmark and now is a citizen of and lives in the USA an African-American, a Danish-American, a Denmark-born African-American, an African-Dane (Afrodane?), or...? None of these seem satisfactory.

    8. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had points so I could mod you up.

    9. Re:Who cares? by Wavebreak · · Score: 1

      The very notion that you need a term to describe a black person that isn't just 'black' is ridiculous. The only reason the word carries a racist connotation is because people to this day continue to (perhaps subconsciously) think it *should*. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a physical description, like you might say someone is a blonde, brunette, redhead, pale, short, tall, skinny, overweight, whatever. The solution to systemic racism is to never bring race into it in the first place. The ancestry of a person shouldn't matter at all, ever. You judge a person by their own merits alone.

      The way I see it, the only reason there is still racism of any kind in the world, beyond a few deranged individuals, is that people are told that race is significant in some way. For example, every time you do a study of racial discrimination of any kind, you inadvertently perpetuate the notion that race does or might actually matter in some way. It doesn't. The challenge now is to get people to stop even *thinking* about what race a person is.

      --
      Nobody expects the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal.
    10. Re:Who cares? by JayJay.br · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be "African-European"?

      (just kidding, yeah I got your point...)

    11. Re:Who cares? by nbarriga · · Score: 1

      Is a dark-skinned person that was born in Denmark and now is a citizen of and lives in the USA an African-American, a Danish-American, a Denmark-born African-American, an African-Dane (Afrodane?), or...? None of these seem satisfactory. What about black? I mean, I'm south american, with french and spanish ancestors, but I wouldn't call myself european-south american, I think of myself as white. Disclaimer: I'm not a US citizen and not aware of what are the politically correct words there.
    12. Re:Who cares? by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a dumb article. The vast majority of *top* game designers/programmers are Japanese. With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan. Do I care if there may not be a single gaijin of any color employed in a Japanese game company? Nope. So why should it matter in the US (where the games are nearly all crap anyway)?

    13. Re:Who cares? by cybereal · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Who cares?

      I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity.

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? I demand they stop calling us "whites" and refer to us directly by lineage, I insist that to avoid racist tension, the article refer to me and my "kind" as Danish-German-French-Dutch-American!
      --
      I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
    14. Re:Who cares? by Ardeaem · · Score: 0, Troll

      I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity. Anytime you have such a huge deviation from statistical independence, it begs to be explained. Maybe YOU aren't interested in the causes, but there are many people who are. Historically, there have been similar deviations from statistical independence, caused by things like slavery, other violations of civil rights, or simply geographically inequitable distributions of resources. Some people find it interesting to study the lingering effects of these violations of equity. This sounds like a classic example.

      Just because YOU aren't interested, doesn't mean that other people aren't.

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Well, maybe it is, but it is a whole lot better than what black people used to be called. I wonder why it matters so much to you?
    15. Re:Who cares? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's no such thing. They'd be called Danish.

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups.

    16. Re:Who cares? by Krusso88 · · Score: 1

      I bet if the ti

    17. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    18. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A certain percentage of the US population is black, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American game developers are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed. The importance is not, in this case, the statistical anomaly itself, but rather in the reason for it.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    19. Re:Who cares? by Krusso88 · · Score: 1

      I bet if the ti Blame the new form!! As I was saying, I bet if this article was entitled "White's and the video game industry," /. would be getting complaints about being racist
    20. Re:Who cares? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I always did do poorly in Danish class. Mmmm, Danish class
    21. Re:Who cares? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups.

      That's utter bull. Every nation does the same, even the ones that insist they don't. If you have blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by, it's foolish to ignore that and refuse to classify them.
    22. Re:Who cares? by urbanriot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree completely. The US has so many problems with race, because they seem pay so much specific attention to racial differences and continually bring up 'problems' or 'insight' into these differences. It's especially amusing when groups that don't belong to these minorities are the ones discussing these 'issues'.

      Who cares?
    23. Re:Who cares? by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      But that's beside the point. What the GP (not me, I'm a different AC) meant was whether it'd make *sense* to do so. And that certainly is valid question. It may be a valid question, but it is kinda silly. In my experience the question is asked by white people who have no black or African-American friends. If you're wondering whether a person is African-American (in the only commonly-used sense) just ask them. If you consider it mildly unpatriotic for Americans to hyphenate their Americanism, don't pretend the problem is someone else's-- it's yours. Stop whining.
    24. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never knew there had to be any specific percentage of "African-Americans" participating in any activity.

      Clearly you have never spoken to Jesse Jackson.

    25. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by And what culture/rules do the people labelled as African Americans live by?

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism.
    26. Re:Who cares? by akintayo · · Score: 1

      I am going to guess African, they would call him/her African. What is it ?

      Most multi ethnic societies are obsessed with ethnic groups, either to conduct, redress or prevent discrimination. Some current examples would be Guyana, Malaysia, China, Germany, France, Rwanda, South Africa, Zimbabwe and India. These countries all currently have problems related to ethnic tensions, or are resolving past ethnic problems. Governments that ignore the problem on a official level, rarely observe that the problem goes away or gets better.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    27. Re:Who cares? by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A certain percentage of the US population is X: white, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American Y: Chinese Restaurant owners are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed. Maybe it's not not social "inequity", but personal choices made by all parties involved. Sure, with different values of X and Y, your mileage may vary.
    28. Re:Who cares? by spintriae · · Score: 2, Funny

      So true. There's no distinction between race in the UK, is there? Black, Irish, German and French people in English probably don't even realize they're immigrants. And the British aren't even familiar with those words. They were just invented by Americans to satisfy their obsession with the classification of ethnicity.

    29. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      The very notion that you need a term to describe a black person that isn't just 'black' is ridiculous. The only reason the word carries a racist connotation is because people to this day continue to (perhaps subconsciously) think it *should*. As far as I'm concerned, it's just a physical description, like you might say someone is a blonde, brunette, redhead, pale, short, tall, skinny, overweight, whatever. The solution to systemic racism is to never bring race into it in the first place. The ancestry of a person shouldn't matter at all, ever. You judge a person by their own merits alone.

      Oh, but you can't do that; their merits may have been compromised due to their race, religion, sex or upbringing. We should therefore encourage the incompetent because they had no choice in becoming what they are today.

      The way I see it, the only reason there is still racism of any kind in the world, beyond a few deranged individuals, is that people are told that race is significant in some way. For example, every time you do a study of racial discrimination of any kind, you inadvertently perpetuate the notion that race does or might actually matter in some way. It doesn't. The challenge now is to get people to stop even *thinking* about what race a person is.

      Yeah, right. I was told in school that when I see a person I should see their inner person before any external characteristics. Something that never left me was the quote "When I see a person in a wheelchair, I notice the person first and the chair second." Sorry but I'm afraid this is outright malarky of the worst kind. The first thing I notice when I see a person in a wheelchair is the fact that their head is several feet below mine. Then I notice that they're sitting down. The wheels are an obvious extension to same. Sometimes I even notice that they're black or Indian or female next! Imagine that! The first thing I use to form a mental image of a person is my eyes! Next is my ears to hear what noises emanate from them and my nose to smell any odours they may carry with them (pleasant or otherwise).

      You're never going to get people to stop thinking about what race a person is when they are staring them in the face, but what you can do is stop putting a decided emphasis on characteristics that are meaningless. Who cares what race a person is if they're able to do a job well? What does it matter?

      What really happens when a group is "found" to be under-represented in a particular field? Other groups get together and concoct rules and legislation to force said group to become further represented in that field. Other qualified members of that field then come to resent these formerly under-represented individuals because now they'll never be certain whether they entered due to their skills, merits and hard work or because the HR department hadn't filled their quota. Whether these factors are true or not is irrelevant - you're always going to have that disdain amongst others in the company no matter what anybody says about it. Does it benefeit the person to be labelled "an affirmative action hire"? Does it benefeit the company to hire somebody because of legislation versus skill level? How does it better society at large to pigeon hole people into positions they're not qualified for other than to encourage sub-standard quality products to be produced?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    30. Re:Who cares? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      In Australia we really dont care too much.
      Mind you we are the multi-cultural country.

    31. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      same goes for you and whatever bullshit americafuckyeah Windows games you're gay for

    32. Re:Who cares? by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be African-American by definition means to be born in Africa then become naturalized in the Americas.
      Therefore, being born in Ethiopia and naturalized a Columbian makes one African-American.

      Any other definition erodes the common language we rely upon. To simply call one an 'African-American' because of skin color implies that 'African-American' is a color which it is not but a hijacked term for what it really means. Might as well call people 'Red Armadillos', 'Striped Rhinos', or 'Musky Badgers' because they're neither.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    33. Re:Who cares? by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      Ask yourself, what could be worse for your MMO than a pissed off black panther guild? Oh, I don't know, a bunch of trolls wearing sheets and pointy hats, flocking around a grand wizard lich king?
      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    34. Re:Who cares? by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Silly example of this in an interview with black British athlete, Kriss Ababusi.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    35. Re:Who cares? by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I usually notice people hyphenating their own nationalism. Whoever is speaking tends to have their own simpler idea of their identity, it's those "other" people who are hyphenated.

    36. Re:Who cares? by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      From now on I want to be called "European-South-American". Thanks.

      --
      So say we all
    37. Re:Who cares? by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      Damn. Usually don't notice people hyphenating themselves.

    38. Re:Who cares? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, it's just a physical description, like you might say someone is a blonde, brunette, redhead, pale, short, tall, skinny, overweight, whatever. Did you ever look at an Indian (from India...), or Egyptian? They have the same skin color that many blacks have, yet you would not call him or her black, you'd say Indian or Egyptian. This doesn't jibe with your opinion above...

      The way I see it, the only reason there is still racism of any kind in the world, beyond a few deranged individuals, is that people are told that race is significant in some way. For example, every time you do a study of racial discrimination of any kind, you inadvertently perpetuate the notion that race does or might actually matter in some way. It doesn't. The challenge now is to get people to stop even *thinking* about what race a person is. This is probably very true. Unfortunately, considering that there are people of all races (I'd prefer 'ethnicity' since we're really all the same race...) who will never actually see things that way -- and will never teach their children to see things that way. Because of that, what you propose is a bit of a pipe-dream.
    39. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as I know, "black" is acceptable most of the time, but a little on the blunt side. I use it, and despite being a scrawny white guy I've never gotten my ass kicked for saying it or even gotten a dirty look.

      I've told my Ethiopian (and decidedly black) boss that the clients I'm expecting are black, or reminded him that it was the black couple I'm refering to, not the Filipino or Chinese or White couples he saw me with earlier.

      What other distinction am I supposed to make? "The tall people with dark hair and brown eyes"? From his office 40' from the front door he can observe their skin colour and estimate their height but their eyes are a tad more tricky.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    40. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To simply call one an 'African-American' because of skin color implies that 'African-American' is a color which it is not but a hijacked term for what it really means. Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      Besides, you miss the point: by classifying people in this way, we presume that they share commonalities (such as culture or "rules" as the GP puts it) when in fact these things are stereotypes.

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American?
    41. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm concerned, it's just a physical description, like you might say someone is a blonde, brunette, redhead, pale, short, tall, skinny, overweight, whatever. Did you ever look at an Indian (from India...), or Egyptian? They have the same skin color that many blacks have, yet you would not call him or her black, you'd say Indian or Egyptian. This doesn't jibe with your opinion above...

      Those weren't my words, but in answer to your question - yes, quite often. Know what I say when describing them to another person? "He looked Indian" or "The Sri Lanken gentleman" or "The Persian couple".

      FWIW, Indian characteristics and black characteristics are as dissimilar as dogs and cats.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    42. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America. Exactly like Pennsylvania Dutch, who are called "Pennsylvania Dutch" even though they aren't really Dutch and don't all live in Pennsylvania. And, check it: someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them?

      Regarding black Americans and the notion of "well, let's just call them black Americans." True, you could do exactly that. But how is it more accurate? I'd venture to say that there are extremely few black people who are truly "black" skinned, and lots who are on the pale side of brown. They're just called "black" by convention, even if it's not 100% precise. Furthermore, America doesn't equal the USA, it's two continents. We call USA-ians "Americans" also by convention. There's no escaping it, we're stuck using a non-precise moniker one way or another. "African American" is just one more, and happens to be the one that people generally find less offensive when compared with Negro, Afro-American and nigger. It leads one to wonder, is the constant self-righteous outrage over the term "African American" based on logic (I've argued here, no) or based upon an anger that the blacks among us have the gall to object to being called whatever the hell we feel like calling them?

      To answer the parent post's question directly, obviously black people in Denmark aren't African-Americans, just like Russians aren't Poles, even if they wind up in the same country. But if by chance a black person from Denmark moves to the US and gets called African-American, it's not going to cause the universe to self-destruct. Real world categories are heuristic, not absolute.

      As for the pic of Chiwetel Ejiofor, who cares? Oops, maybe some ijit misidentified him as African American. What does that prove? I accidentally called my Scottish friend Irish one day, According to Genius Maddox, I guess my dumb mistake means that Scotland and Ireland don't make any sense.

      Now, on to people of color. No argument from me: that's nauseatingly P.C.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    43. Re:Who cares? by t0rkm3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they were invented as a means to create separation so that benefits can be awarded based on a particular racial profile.

      I'm Native American therefore I am _entitled_ to certain benefits. African-Americans, Asian Americans, Native American (Non-Polynesian) are all ethno-types that are treated differently by college scholarships, gov't jobs, gov't benefits, and EOE demographics.

      Maybe if we didn't have to categorize ourselves for this that and the other, then we wouldn't spend so much time worrying about which bin we belong in.

    44. Re:Who cares? by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In Australia we really dont care too much.

      Would we get that same viewpoint from an aboriginal?

    45. Re:Who cares? by courseofhumanevents · · Score: 1

      ...and then he was just gone!

    46. Re:Who cares? by cheater512 · · Score: 0

      I thought someone would bring that up. :P

      Some Aboriginals still live out in the bush in their own little clusters.
      Thats their choice.

      But if you see a aboriginal you dont think "Hey there is a aboriginal". They are just another person.
      Along with the asians, indians, europeans, americans, etc...

    47. Re:Who cares? by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups. Wow, that's utterly insane. Please, what country are you from? Would you care to describe how your country is different? Heck, anything to support your statement would be nice.

      Since Denmark was mentioned, maybe you should read some news--there have been some major riots and political happenings there over religion/race within the past month!

      I'm by no means claiming the US is perfect--it's not. But look at Australia--beach riots a year or two ago over Muslims. Look at France--ghettoization and discontent from Muslim/African populations that is hard to find an equivalent of in America in the last several decades. Balkans--banned from soccer matches for racist taunts. Chinese--discrimination against Uighur and Tibetan citizens. And where I've come across the most openly racist (against black Africans) people--Egypt. People don't even pretend.

      Hell, if there is one constant across the world it's racism..

      FWIW, I've heard Cuba actually has a remarkably egalitarian society--at least with regards to race--but it's so hard to hear reliable things about Cuba that I don't know..
    48. Re:Who cares? by empaler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, as a Dane, I'd usually go with "black", or quite a lot more likely, their name. In one specific instance, I'd go with 'aunt', but I know that's cheating, on account of her being my aunt.

    49. Re:Who cares? by empaler · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more focused on... the other aspects of brown life. Ergh.

    50. Re:Who cares? by k3r3nsky'sr3v3ng3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. I'm not really sure how it is in the north (I live in AL) , but we had this black speaker come for our black history month assembly in February and talk to us for about three hours about "heroes of the African-American community". He, who claimed to have a degree from Tuskeegee on civil rights, always referred to blacks as "African-American". Of course, we got the usual droning on about the history of slavery and civil rights (but oddly enough, affirmative action was never mentioned). The thing that got me was that Lyndon Johnson, despite granting blacks their civil rights, didn't get mentioned once in the speech. Of course, most ordinary people still refer to blacks as blacks and whites are referred to as whites and hispanics (whose population is rapidly growing in the south) are referred to as Mexicans. Unfortunately, many of the people, black, white, or otherwise, do a very poor job of disproving stereotypes of their particular ethnic group. Many blacks drive cars with big ass rims blaring terrible rap/r&b music. Many whites drive their full-size trucks with the stars and bars stickers and straight-pipes blaring some awful country music. It seems to me that ethnic groups are compartmentalized and stereotyped because many among them do their best to be as distinct as possible. Usually its just the media and activists that try to snuff-out any intelligence by using hyphens. Its almost a double standard, people want their hyphens and recognitions and affirmative-action benefits, but they get all pissy about stereotypes.

      --
      "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." Dwight Eisenhower
    51. Re:Who cares? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      There's a lot more racial tension in France than in the US.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    52. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While advertising race relations may polarize some. The real fact is that every side needs to admit that they are also part of the problems. As well they need to make sure that each side is treated equally for their indesgresions. For Example: I was working in my cube and there was an Afracan American Person a few cubes away talking rather loudly to a family member and here is a quote. "You Just need to keep looking, I am sure you can find a Black Photographer somewhere" and this is inside a government job. If a White person said that (and switching the black to white) they would be in so much trouble.
      A good part of the racial tentions are because one group needs to walk on egg shells while the other group feels like they deserve to show their own racism on their sleeves (This is actually true for any minority group, not just race). This justice inequality is a major factor in keeping the devide, because one feels they have lost a right while the other group is allowed to abuse their own.
      Because of this devide it exagrates the problems, for both groups feel safe they will normally live and stay in areas of their own race, because people don't like living in an area where people hate them. This is the key issue. With Blacks living in Black Comunites going to Black Schools and Whites living in White Comunity and going to white school (No they are not legally seporated, but check out a City School with a suburban school and check out the numbers) Groups can push either good habits or bad ones. Black Comunites have come from a very repressed generations their Grandparents/Parents growing up before the Cival Rights erra. So the comunity they are in doesn't have the advantage of supportive groups who support education, and white collar jobs, like the white comunities do. I have a friend who works in a City School, one of his black students went to him "Why should I stay in school and do all this work, after I am done Ill only get a low paying job. Or I can quit school now and sell drugs and make good money". The American black comunity is supported by pushing failure and discoraging sucess. While the White comunity pushes more toward sucess.

    53. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A famous biologist recently got in trouble for saying this, as it was blown out as a racist statement, while he was merely making a scientific observation. I shall repeat it here, not necessarily with the belief that it is true (I don't know whether it is or not), but because it may account for the statistical discrepancy in a completely valid form:

      There is a common expectation that all races of humans of people have equivalent intelligence. There is no scientific basis for this assumption. If you feel unconvinced by it, replace the word "intelligence" with "athletic ability" and see how you feel. I do hope that this does not bring the racists out.
    54. Re:Who cares? by H0p313ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought someone would bring that up. :P Some Aboriginals still live out in the bush in their own little clusters. Thats their choice. But if you see a aboriginal you dont think "Hey there is a aboriginal". They are just another person. Along with the asians, indians, europeans, americans, etc...

      One of my classmates from high school spent five years in Alice Springs doing AIDS counseling for the local aboriginal population. He'd say you're full of it.

      You might find that the young urban population is relatively tolerant. But from everyone I've talked to non-urban Australia is one of the most racist societies out there.

      However, this is all word-of-mouth and hearsay so it proves nothing

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    55. Re:Who cares? by Malekin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think you're right, even if I wish you were.

      From the abstract of this study:
      http://dspace.anu.edu.au/manakin/handle/1885/41761?show=full

      "About 15 percent of Australians have experienced racism within institutional settings like the workplace and in education. About one-quarter of Australians report the experience of âeveryday racismsâ(TM)."

      Ignoring racism and claiming it doesn't exist is not the best way to make it go away.

    56. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Language evolves. The term "African American", like it or not, is applied to people who are black - true geo-ethnic heritage rarely comes into it (and your example is purposefully misleading - the term "African American" is not just confined to people who have been born in Africa, but also used to describe descendants of African immigrants).

      False. Ask someone from the West Indies if they're "African American" and see what they say. It's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites too afraid to say the word "black" or "negroe" and who thought "coloured" was too passe (and overly generic).

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    57. Re:Who cares? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      There is some great conspiracy by European Americans to suppress black game developers? Good grief...

      When flipped around, it seems inappropriate to use "European Americans" in the same sentence as "black" doesn't it? So why is it somehow proper to use the term "Africian American" in the same sentence as "white"? I support equality in freedom, terminology, and even game development opportunities!

    58. Re:Who cares? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I work with a guy that's African. Came to US for college straight from Ghana.

      He has no problem being called black.

      He also has no problem walking into bars declaring: "Where are da white wimmen at?". He thinks this (and the whole movie) is hilarious.

      Only once did we run into trouble. Some 2nd generation+ born in America African descendants decided he wasn't "African enough". Some native tongue (No clue what it was) and some bouncers quickly ended that.

    59. Re:Who cares? by chromatic · · Score: 1

      The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black.

      ... except for people born in Africa whose skin isn't black, including plenty of people from Egypt and South Africa.

    60. Re:Who cares? by Wiseman1024 · · Score: 1
      --
      I was about to say 13256278887989457651018865901401704640, but it appears this number is private property.
    61. Re:Who cares? by markdavis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Then why is it that "Africian Americans" refer to "European Americans" as "white"? Do you think Caucasians are any more "white" than Negros are "black"?

      I think what irritates people the most about the term "Africian American" is not that it is not particularly accurate, but that it conveys some special social standing that is not equally applied to all other racial groups.

    62. Re:Who cares? by markdavis · · Score: 1

      No, actually, you would be "European American". Despite what so many people seem to forget, Africa is a *continent* not a country.

      And yes, I would demand that I be called "European American" if the other term used were "Africian American". And "white" if the other term were "black". And "Caucasian" if the other term were "Negro".

      Term equity. It is only fair.

    63. Re:Who cares? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      From the abstract of this study:

      Does this study define "racism" in some sort of objective, measurable fashion, or is it up to the respondent to decide whether or not they have been subjected to it ?

    64. Re:Who cares? by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fact: Black activists in the 1960s started calling themselves "African-American" instead of Negro in order to connect their fight for civil rights to the various independence movements in Africa happening at the same time. It caught on more over time. Malcolm X noted the term in his autobiography.

      The term "African-American"

    65. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fact: Black activists in the 1960s started calling themselves "African-American" instead of Negro in order to connect their fight for civil rights to the various independence movements in Africa happening at the same time. It caught on more over time. Malcolm X noted the term in his autobiography.

      Fact: That still doesn't mean everybody with black skin is African-American or that the term is any less nonsensical or over-used.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    66. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 0, Troll

      You miss the point: it's not about how people identify themselves, but how others identify them. You admit it in your post - "it's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites" - the point being that it is widely used.

      I'm saying this is indicative of deep-seated prejudice.

    67. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 1

      That's my point: the term African American is used to describe people who are black, with no regard to true geo-ethnic background.

    68. Re:Who cares? by westlake · · Score: 1
      Really? Who cares?

      To begin, it might spare Take-Two and Rockstar a lot of grief if they had some social and political connection to the American inner city, however tenuous and fragile.

      Secondly, the American game developer has an extraordinarily rich multicultural - multiracial - heritage on which to draw and new markets which he must learn how to reach.

      But, for the most part, he is the John McCain of gaming. Much younger - and more aware and more adept at manipulating the technology available to him.

      But his stories, themes, characters, and settings are endlessly recycled.

      The exceptions prove the rule, of course.

      Will Wright had the wit and imagination to see that domestic situation comedy and drama - the stuff of soap opera - could anchor a successful simulation game.

    69. Re:Who cares? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Could you clarify what you mean by "race"? Of the characteristics you list one is physical and three are political.

    70. Re:Who cares? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're both right. If you need to describe someone on appearance alone, most people in the US would not object to the word "black". A certain subset of people who would be described as "black" choose to identify themselves as African-American.

      It is no more complicated than that.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    71. Re:Who cares? by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Ignoring racism and claiming it doesn't exist is not the best way to make it go away. Are you sure? It marginalizes it. Whereas creating government institutions to deal with it makes it publicly recognized reality. Skin color differences have a chance of drifting away as a meme when they are not constantly re-enforced. And, as all memes they stick, around when they are re-enforced. People "move on" because different concerns emerge -- not because they become more ethical. And having a constant reminder doesn't allow for this concern to disappear.
      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    72. Re:Who cares? by CroDragn · · Score: 1

      There's no scientific basis for believing it, there's no scientific basis for not believing it. Why? Because we have yet been able to get a real definition of exactly what intelligence is, much less a way to measure it. Is someone who struggles with basic algebra but can play the piano at a masters level smart? What about someone with 5 ph.d's but absolutely clueless when it comes to social situations? Until there's both a consistent way to measure intelligence (I.Q. tests are absolutely meaningless), I find it safer to error on the side that doesn't promote racism and believe that all races are equally gifted with brains.

    73. Re:Who cares? by Minimalist360 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah like cos it doesn't work if I'm white and from South Africa, and then I come to the US.

    74. Re:Who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With few exceptions the best games are all Made In Japan.

      Wow, that's stirring up a hornet's nest. I'm calling BS, or at best "matter of taste", on that one buddy.

    75. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every time you do a study of racial discrimination of any kind, you inadvertently perpetuate the notion that race does or might actually matter in some way. It doesn't. The challenge now is to get people to stop even *thinking* about what race a person is.

      Tell me about it. We need to get rid of that "which race are you" mentality. After all, after that we still have to go through the religions thing, and then the gender thing.... all that BEFORE the fuckin' aliens arrive.

      Damn green job-stealin' assholes (yes they have two asses).
    76. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know who moderated this up but you're an idiot. Your arguments could be used against your own arguments.

      Just call them black. There is nothing offensive about that. We call white people white.

    77. Re:Who cares? by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      First of all, bull.

      Secondly, the noun is 'Aborigine'. 'Aboriginal' is an adjective.

    78. Re:Who cares? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      That's just a load of bullshit. If you wanna say they're black, just say they are black. Spare me all the politically correct crap. They are either American or African. Can't be both.

      --

      Your head a splode
    79. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH GREAT race baiting on slashdot. If people are not interested in building games then fine, but don't sit there and say there are more whites, this reeks of the old, the white man keeps me down bull.

    80. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      term used to identify people in a specific cultural group What cultural group? Pennsylvania Dutch is a cultural group; African Americans/black people is a race. Big difference.

      It leads one to wonder, is the constant self-righteous outrage over the term "African American" based on logic (I've argued here, no) How is it any more illogical than the term white people? Not all whites come from the same place, not all blacks come from the same place. Yeah, blacks aren't pure black; neither are whites. Should we start calling whites European Americans? No, that's just stupid. So yeah, it is more accurate, because not all blacks are from Africa. If 'African American' were an applicable term, than Middle Eastern blacks in America would be Asian Americans. Not very accurate anymore, is it?

      or based upon an anger that the blacks among us have the gall to object to being called whatever the hell we feel like calling them? How do you figure? If a white person wanted to be called a European American, I'd react the same way. Of course, the whole thing can be avoided by, as my link says, simply calling blacks black and whites white, that way, mixed race people aside, the term is accurate regardless of racial origin and current nationality.
    81. Re:Who cares? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Africa is no more a "continent" than Europe is. It, Europe, Asia Minor, Asia, and India are all part of the same land mass.

      So he'd be a Eurasindiafrican American (we smartly divided our continent into "north and south" so you can still refer to it properly without resorting to portmanteau)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    82. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      67% of coke addicts are white, yet only 0.5% of coke plantators are white ;-)

    83. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "American" does equal someone from USA. There is only one country on the planet that has the term "America" in it. Anyone on the planet would understand that an American is someone from the United States and not, for instance, French Guyana.

    84. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say we've got a black guy who's parents were from Haiti but moved to France prior to this person's birth, and then the guy immigrated from France to the US. Explain to me how that guy is an African American? Because his race origionated in Africa? Guess what, so did the entire human race. If someone like that is an 'African American', so is a pale white guy like me.

    85. Re:Who cares? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to James Watson's comments? If so, that's not a direct quote so far as I can tell. Care to cite who this "famous biologist" is?

    86. Re:Who cares? by XorNand · · Score: 1

      I've always been confused by the term. I don't understand why black Americans qualify themselves with "African-" during everyday conversation. Something "blue-green" would be something not quite blue and not quite green. How is a black American anything other than simply "American?" I'm of Irish descent, but to identify myself "Irish-American" would be very odd. I've never been to Ireland, don't speak Gaelic, and didn't know what a shillelagh is until earlier today--I am 100% culturally American. Even if I studied up on Irish history, learned to play the bagpipes, and donned Celtic garb, I'd still simply be an American with an interest in my familial roots.

      Sorry, but "African-American" is just a made-up, bullshit term that is carryover from Malcom X's philosophy. It intentionally creates a devise, separatist mindset and I refuse to use it. The descriptive words "white" and "black", while woefully binary, suit me just fine on the rare occasion that I need to further classify a particular person by race.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    87. Re:Who cares? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      And only Europe is so bloody obsessed with their citizens' religion.

    88. Re:Who cares? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      I you happen to find one, you may want to go to a Chinese restaurant owned by someone of Indian decent.

      It's Chinese food kicked up a notch.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    89. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously don't live in the right place then

    90. Re:Who cares? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, right. Race itself is a pretty stupid concept, with no scientific definition.

      That said, the guy in your example would be African-American only if he self-identified as such. Not every person with brown skin living in the US wants to be called African-American.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    91. Re:Who cares? by phreakincool · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most PC people would call me African-American. I'm an American. However, if I were pushed toward a label, I would prefer either Black or Afro-American. And technically, my skin ain't black. It's a light tan color. The funny thing is that most people think I'm Hispanic or Somoan. So, I guess my point is that people have to put labels on things to make sense of the world around them. In my youth and adult life, I have had friends of all races and nationalities. I don't refer to any of them by those names. They are just my friends. Thank you.

    92. Re:Who cares? by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Yes, and your value of Y, Chinese restaurant owners, will probably show a greater percentage of people of Chinese descent, and therefore lower percentage of whites, because one would expect Chinese restaurants to hold a stronger attraction for people of Chinese descent; it's a part of their (native|ancestral) culture. So here, of course personal choices come into play.

      The question (or, rather, a question) is if the American video game industry has the same cultural draw for white American males that would account for their disproportionate representation in the industry, and if not, why not.

      I believe that it does to some extent, and I think that this accounts for much of the disparity, though there's also undoubtedly some social inequality in the mix as GP suggested. As gaming becomes more mainstream, more black people (and other minorities) are playing games - it's not just for pasty-faced basement-dwellers anymore!

      Based on my little slice of personal experience, the boom really only started taking off in the late 1990s, so a lot of minority kids didn't really dig into gaming until then, and I think it's a bit too soon to expect their influx into the industry. My guess is that within the next 5 years or so we'll see a decent increase in minority students enrolled in game design programs and entering the professional industry. (I also think that better design tools will be made available to the general public, and that you'll see almost as many people designing and releasing amateur, no-budget games as there are people putting stuff onto YouTube, but that's a topic for another discussion.)

    93. Re:Who cares? by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The vast majority of *top* game designers/programmers are Japanese. So... you're saying we should nuke black America?

      YOU RACIST! ;D
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    94. Re:Who cares? by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And I'm a white guy who was born in Africa and is now an American citizen. I have no problem referring to myself as African-American just to see the look on a person's face. Or being called white, or telling American born blacks who refer to themselves as African-Americans that they aren't 'African' enough.

      I don't know that I've vocalized it but I've often wondered where the white women were at when I walked into a bar.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    95. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing. They'd be called Danish.

      Only the US has a peculiar obsession with separating its population into ethnic groups. I'm sorry but.. Are you fucking high?

      Muslims and africans in Europe, koreans and southeast asians in China and Japan, the indigenous of Latin America, Australia, and hell just about any country that sprang from a European colony. anyone from a country ending in "Stan" in Russia, Arabs in Israel, Jews in Iran-- can I stop yet?

      Do you know what the caste system is in India? Do you understand why Iraq is such a quagmire? Do you know what's going on in the Baltics right now, or in central Africa, or in Burma? Do you know why there's so much outrage over China having the Olympics? Have you heard of World War 2?

      And who modded this insightful? Just because it slammed America? If anything, we're the country that feels the most guilt and does the most hand-wringing over our prejudices! In most of the rest of the world it's a fucking matter of government policy.

    96. Re:Who cares? by CodyRazor · · Score: 1

      If black people can be offended from being called black i can be offended from being called white.

      --
      So Skulldilocks threw acid on the schoolchildrens' faces, cause somebody from the bible told her to do it!
    97. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you ever wonder how much you could get done if you didn't spend so much time making longwinded posts about nothing on the Internet?

    98. Re:Who cares? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Unless you're a 'wog' or an 'abbo' of course.

    99. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pennsylvania Dutch are from Germany, predominantly southern Germany (hence they historically spoke low german), and generally their families trace their roots to a migration in the mid 1700's due to a recession in Europe at the time. As is so common in the history of America, the ethnic group has slowly combined with the customs of the rest of the United States. My family (who came here in 1743), for example, has not spoken low german since my great grandparents generation. Further making it harder to recognize Pennsylvania Dutch is the vilification of all things German that occurred in the 30's and 40's, causing many to change their family names. Becher became Becker, Kolb became Culp, and so on.

      Just to clear up the common misconception, the Amish are a subset of Pennsylvania Dutch with much stricter beliefs on religion and life style. While many Amish can be considered Pennsylvania Dutch, the Pennsylvania Dutch are not all Amish. In fact, only a small number are or were. /enjoys genealogy // thinks the race question should never be asked, cause it just doesnt matter /// people that bring it up normally are profiting off the controversy in some way

    100. Re:Who cares? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Of course a matter of taste is involved. My primary exception to that rule is World of Warcraft which many people despise here. There are others ...

      I prefer handhelds and maybe that will explain some of it.

    101. Re:Who cares? by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      What continent is the USA on? Any other countries on that same continent? Any other continents with "America" in the name?

    102. Re:Who cares? by Swifti · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded you insightful? People who exclusively play JRPGs?

      If you're going to argue that most American developed games are crap, support your argument. From what I can see, your claim is completely unsubstantiated. The best video games are nationally agnostic. From what I can see from the top 200 games calculated by average publication review score, the best games are Japanese, North American, and European with no regions having a preponderance of critical acclaim. How many critically acclaimed North American games do you need to play in order to conclude that good games made in America aren't just an exception to the rule?

      Tell me, have you ever played any of these great games that I have picked off the top of my head?: Gears of War, Bioshock, Portal, Diablo, Starcraft, Sam and Max Hit the Road, Grim Fandango, Freespace2, Fallout, Oblivion, X-Wing, Half-Life, Psychonauts, SimCity, Crimson Skies, Rogue Squadron, Metroid Prime, God of War, Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Burnout

    103. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite right.

      Also, lots of basketball fans are Asian. Yet there are very few Asians in the NBA.

      So who cares? Similarly, 90% of white people eat Chinese food, but 90% of the chefs in Chinese restaurants are Chinese!

      Any more pointless stats?

    104. Re:Who cares? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Please, please come to Australia and teach us to refer to ourselves correctly!

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    105. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh... are you sure about "with few exceptions" I can think of *many* exceptions. Of course, I think the last great game coming out of Japan would have been FFVII or maybe Mario 64.

      "prefers" = caption

    106. Re:Who cares? by Hucko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Direct hit. I'm a taxi driver and while I had a negative opinion of the welfare benefactors I had the same opinion as gp until I began taxi driving. Australia is racist... unfortunately. I am forever having people hop into my cab and begin a conversation with a phrase similar to "How do you put up with the Aboriginals?" I now respond in kind with a simple "Aboriginals? Nah, they are pretty good most of the time. Every troublemaker I've had with has been trouble with the Caucasians... much like yourselves..."

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    107. Re:Who cares? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      What continent is the USA on? Any other countries on that same continent? Any other continents with "America" in the name?

      North America. Yes, there's Canada, Mexico, and a bunch of small countries that I'm not going to list. Yes, South America.

      Try telling me that I'm an American simply because I live on the continent of North America. I won't yell or anything but I will politely correct you because I'm a Canadian and that's just how we roll. We still use "black" to reference a person's race because using African-American to describe a black Canadian would be confusing. Even the news and the police will use black, white, asian, or native when describing a suspect because "urban" never caught on and skin colour is an obvious part of a description.

    108. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American? Culture. Africans are different from American Blacks, mostly due to culture. Why call someone african american when you mean black? Are you going to call some guy from Barbados a.a.? How about the guy I know from South Africa?
      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    109. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Caucasians are a mostly muslim group in and around what is now Chechnya. I'm white.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    110. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Hell, if there is one constant across the world it's racism.. Not really. France, it's racism, Australia, it's intolerant muslims, Egypt, it's more like 5000 years of feuds and grudges.
      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    111. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Who cares? If you're going to prattle about how rockstar doesn't have street cred because they don't have a lot of blacks on staff, then your opinion is worth nothing. If you think that there's some bias in their hiring, then that's different. In my experience, though, we don't care what color you are, we have a hard enough time finding qualified people as it is.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    112. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, check it: someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them?

      I'd probably call him a honky, but not to his face. Those Dutch guys are mean mofos, you know?
    113. Re:Who cares? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      TFA mentions "whites", so I guess "blacks" is acceptable as opposed to the more US-centric "african-american".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    114. Re:Who cares? by Confused · · Score: 1

      More interesting than the statistic would be, if black people play more games those of other colour living in the same neighbourhood. Probably not.

      And I guess the same applies to the game producers, that the number of black game producers / programmers etc. quite well match the colour distribution of people having the right skill, training or diploma.

      Most likely, the thing should be resumed as: Well-fare people have more time to play games than others and baggers in supermarkets can't program games. Apply appropriate colour distribution.

    115. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Japanese treated white people as poorly as the Americans treated blacks in video games, you might care.

      Who's the last black character you've seen in a video game? OK, now who's the last black video game character you saw who was not a felon committing Grand Theft Auto? Sure, there are a few more. In the past 2 decades, we've had, what, 16 playable black characters. Of the 5 in the 5 past years, 2 were in GTA, and 1 was a graffiti artist. Not exactly the most accurate or flattering depiction, eh?

    116. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is a dark-skinned person that was born in Denmark and now is a citizen of and lives in the USA an African-American, a Danish-American, a Denmark-born African-American, an African-Dane (Afrodane?), or...?
      They're a nigger, that's what.
    117. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dutch Pennsylvanians of course.

    118. Re:Who cares? by empaler · · Score: 1

      If you by 'past month' mean 'some time ago', and to clarify, the storm in the teacup is about the drawings of the Prophet M[o|u]hamm[e|a]d.

    119. Re:Who cares? by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      depends, an aboriginal that lives in the city, or one of the ones in the problematic aboriginal settlements where no matter how much money the government gives them, it just gets spent on booze.

      the latter is what causes everyone else to kick up a stink sometimes, it's been documented the extreme level of rape and substance abuse. Add to that that aboringinals receive benefits the rest of us can only dream of, Aus-study you say? abs-tudy if your an aboriginal, get paid a lot more for the same thing, free housing, and so on.

      From a government help standpoint, they are treated specially and get given more than the general population by a non-trivial amount. When such aid achieves something it's not so bad, but when all the public hears about are the outback towns with alcoholism problems, it annoys people.

      Anyone who works for a living or who is studying is respectable, drunks and rapists don't deserve our respect, regardless of race, in my opinion. Let alone a heap of government subsidies.

      All I wish for is for everyone to be treated equally, how can everyone be treated equally when one minority gets such great privileges over all others, they should have the same as everyone else.

    120. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them? Dutch?

    121. Re:Who cares? by dvda11 · · Score: 1

      Could you please specify what you have read happened in Denmark? I dont recall any religion/race riots...

    122. Re:Who cares? by AdmiralAudio · · Score: 1

      Pffft. The Dutch...

    123. Re:Who cares? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... what country are you from?

      What!

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    124. Re:Who cares? by donscarletti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fact: anyone who prefaces a statement with "Fact:" sounds like an arrogant jerk, even if they are right.

      Any argument is implicitly presented as a truth, stating that it is fact is redundant.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    125. Re:Who cares? by lareader · · Score: 1

      I doubt that it was the riots and ethnical problems that the parent was talking about - I assume that they meant to say that black citizens of Denmark are not "African-Scandinavian" - they are Danish.

      This may seem little more than sophistry and playing with words, but words DO have meaning and in this case, looking at the US, you could easily get the impression that the unified nation actually consisted of a vast number of tribes, who differentiated between one another by the sort of cumbersome titles as "African-American," "Irish-American" or "Italian-American." For a citizen of a European nation, having people designate themselves as part of another nation and part of their current nation seems schizophrenic.

      Perhaps it is simply a symptom of having a huge nation that make people want to feel part of a smaller community, but from my point of view you are either American, French or Italian. Of course, if you do happen to have multiple citizenships, you might call yourself French-American, but the degrees to which people go to further differentiate themselves from being "just" American makes me think that people in the USA does not consider their citizenship as sufficiently distinctive. There are, to my knowledge, no people calling themselves "Italian-Danish" - there are probably people from Italy in Denmark who are Danish citizens, but they are called Danes.

    126. Re:Who cares? by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Individuals are different, but that doesn't prevent groups from being real.

      For example, there are tall and short japanese, and tall and short norwegians. Some japanese are taller than some norwegians.

      This doesn't mean statements such as: "Japanese are on the average shorter than Norwegians" are wrong. To the contrary, that is correct and not in the least controversial.

      Similarily, some women are taller than some men, but despite this it's correct to say that women are generally shorter than men.

      Tallness is uncontroversial, because it's so blindingly obvious you'd just be an IDIOT if you denied this obvious fact.

      Still, apply the same logic to more hidden traits, like behaviour, social norms or god forbid intelligence, and people start vigorously protesting.

      There is no doubt, statistically that Americans of African descent are in many ways statistically significantly different from Americans of for example European descent. Not saying anything about -why- (don't feel like stepping into -that- particular waspnest) but it's just stupid to pretend that there are no differences. There obviously are.

    127. Re:Who cares? by kingturkey · · Score: 1

      Who said I wasn't in Australia? There are some Australians with a proper grasp of the English language, you know.

    128. Re:Who cares? by VariableRob · · Score: 1

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America. This is my exact problem with the use of the term "African-American". Imagine two people, both "African-American". One is from a single parent home, grew up in a ghetto, had a child at 15 and dropped out of school. The other had two hard working parents who insisted on education, sent them to a private school and has set aside money for them to attend college. "African-American" assigns to both of these people specific cultural backgrounds. It suggests that, irrelevant of their personal experiences and lifestyle, knowledge of minor details of their genetic heritage gives major knowledge of their culture, traditions, customs and beliefs. That is racist. Knowing your racial heritage does not tell me anything about you, and to assume that it does is simply ridiculous.
      --
      The seriousness of the above post is not guaranteed.
    129. Re:Who cares? by phpmysqldev · · Score: 1

      False. Ask someone from the West Indies if they're "African American" and see what they say. It's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites too afraid to say the word "black" or "negroe" and who thought "coloured" was too passe (and overly generic).

      The term was made by black leaders during the civil rights movement to stop the use of more derogatory terms. And no people all over the world are not African Americans, just people with dark skin the U.S. We had a large percentage of Jamaican students at my college and they were classified as African Americans. Like it or not, in the U.S. black people are called African Americans. And yes recently many black leaders are making the push for no identifying term and just wanting to be called Americans, but we're not quite there yet

      But then again we could all be called African - X since thats where the human race began =X
    130. Re:Who cares? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      "Furthermore, America doesn't equal the USA, it's two continents. "

      No, the two continents are called THE AmericaS. North America + South America = The Americas. Not America.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    131. Re:Who cares? by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      About as hilarious as my brother in law trying to teach "Eubonics" to one of his colleagues. His colleague was from South Africa of African descent. They were a bunch of Scientists (Genetic Engineers) sitting around a table. I think they had, Danes, East Indians, German, African with the only US born being my brother in law who is of Chinese descent.

    132. Re:Who cares? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America. Exactly like Pennsylvania Dutch, who are called "Pennsylvania Dutch" even though they aren't really Dutch and don't all live in Pennsylvania. And, check it: someone might actually be from the Netherlands and move to Pennsylvania, oh no, what do we call them?

      This is total baloney. Do you somehow honestly think that black people living in Alabama have the same "overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits" as black people living in New York City, and them the same as black people living in Chicago?

      This would be totally presumptuous and ignorant. Such a statement is blatantly false since these are very different cultural groups. It would also be glossing over the important historical fact that many blacks in the north in generations past were never slaves. You can't just take a label like "African American" and slap it on all black people in the US. It is and should be degrading to many.

    133. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CNN once did a report on Africa and talked about the native "African Americans". :snicker:

      Completely irrelvent to this article.

    134. Re:Who cares? by Von+Helmet · · Score: 1

      We do it in England too. I'm White-British-English, although I normally just tick the box saying I don't want to tell them.

    135. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism. I think you folks are forgetting something. The gaming industry sells stuff. People who market stuff that they sell like to segment the market for more effective advertising and, presumably, sales.

      This works. Companies that make products that appeal to the wants/needs of particular groups tend to sell stuff more efficiently. This is not usually seen as racist so much as it is doing something good for your customer; giving them what they want.

      Presumably Black people, African-American people, whatever, actually do have some things in common. Not that every single one likes a particular thing, but that the group as a whole might, on average, prefer certain things. For example, I would guess that many black people would welcome the opportunity to play black characters in video games.

      There are most certainly other commonalities as well. It's not that white game designers are wholly incapable of figuring any of these things out as much as that African-americans are members of the group itself, so, on average, they'll have a much better understanding of the wants and needs of that particular group.

      This isn't racist, this is reality. A higher percentage of Mexican Americans really would prefer tortillas with their evening meals and a higher percentage of Black people, I'm not making this up, really do prefer hip-hop music. It's not racist to try to give your customers something you think the average consumer of that group would prefer. It's good business, and really good manners too.
    136. Re:Who cares? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      What ain't no country I ever heard of! They speak English in What!?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    137. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Pennsylvania Dutch" weren't really Dutch, because they were from Germany. The English speaking colonists bastardized "Pennsylvania Deutsch" into "Pennsylvania Dutch" either because they didn't like the spelling, or they couldn't pronounce it.

    138. Re:Who cares? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I've heard Cuba actually has a remarkably egalitarian society--at least with regards to race--but it's so hard to hear reliable things about Cuba that I don't know..

      In Cuba, citizens of all races are equally poor!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    139. Re:Who cares? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      "African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites"

      White? I'm not white! Plain bleached paper is white! Tippex is white!

      I'm English-European. Racists.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    140. Re:Who cares? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Your link misses the entire point of the term "African American," which is not a fancy P.C. word for "black people," but a term used to identify people in a specific cultural group, with certain overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits. It's come into commonplace usage because it's a unique phrase which sets that group off from other cultural, ethnic and racial groups in America.

      That's funny: one of the black bloggers I read defines it the other way around:

      Black is to African American as Catholic is to Christian. Black is a flavor. African American is a demographic description. Black has meaning, subtlety and context. African American is just a huge bunch of undifferentiated people of African descent
      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    141. Re:Who cares? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "And the British aren't even familiar with those words"

      They are however extremely familiar with, and notably fond of "wog", "nigger", "coon", "jungle bunny", "chinkie", "kike", "dago", "wop", "frog", "sprout", "pakki", "kraut", "jock", "mick", and various other charming terms for people who were unfortunate enough to have evolved from the apes instead of being created in God's image like the English were.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    142. Re:Who cares? by sfbreen · · Score: 1

      The US is a melting pot of cultures. When people come to the US, they are allowed to keep their culture. They do not have to assimilate as that is their right. (Take the city of Miami for example... most speak Spanish and do not represent the percieved view of the American culture) That said, if you live in America, you do not have to change your culture... thus the US does have sub-cultures. The US has many races and many cultures. "The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black" Your comments are obviously just your perceived view. I would bet you don't even live in the US... so how does your opinion have any credibility. Sounds like you are just trying to bash the US. BTW, How did this became a racial topic? These are just statistics. I am not sure how you derived this posting as such. Sounds like you are attempting to turn this article into something racial.

    143. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?
      US politics - Everyone goes on about how good a Christain they are.
      British Politics - Religion is rarely mentioned.

    144. Re:Who cares? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      It doesn't promote racism at all to suggest the probability distribution of being talented at and inclined to develop video games is identical for all races. (One theory I have heard for a similar issue vis a vis sexism is that men and women have the same average intelligence, but men have a wider variance, which means there are proportionally more male geniuses and more male idiots. Thus, when you go to the mathematics or physics department there are more male mathematicians or physicists than women, but there are also more men than women if you look at the opposite side of the curve. The point here is that, even without one population being on average smarter or dumber, or even on average better or worse at particular tasks, differences even in variance will affect proportions of people in a particular occupation if that occupation falls too far to either side of average.)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    145. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 1
      Did you even read this full branch of posts? The parent suggested that research into proportions of people from ethnic groups playing video games was irrelevant, and that distinguishing between "American" and "African American" is a form of prejudice.

      Sounds like you are attempting to turn this article into something racial. Have you read the title of the post? "African Americans and the Video Game Industry". I'm not turning it into anything. It is racial.
    146. Re:Who cares? by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "A certain percentage of the US population is black, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American game developers are too."

      It should therefore follow that an equivalent percentage of the US prison population is black, but strangely there seem to be disproportionately more of them. I personally blame this for the famous Crime Gene, which all black people are born with, so both the police and juries automatically know that any black person who is in possession of something that's fairly new and reasonably expensive must have stolen it from a white person, and should therefore be locked away for a long period to ensure that white property is safe.

      The same does of course apply to drugs thanks to the Dealing Gene that blacks are also born with. So while it's perfectly acceptable to send a young white person who is caught with a small amount of drugs to a rehabilitation center because they obviously have a problem, possessing the same amount of drugs while being black is evidence of dealing them, possibly to white people who would not otherwise need to waste small portions of their lives in rehabilitation centers. Locking the buggers up for a few years is therefore justified, because taking tawny dealers off the streets is the only way to prevent them from forcing innocent white people to buy and take their junk.

      "If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed."

      It's a simple matter of arithmetic, because every black person who is in jail means one less black person to develop games.

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
    147. Re:Who cares? by Winders · · Score: 1
      All I wish for is for everyone to be treated equally, how can everyone be treated equally when one minority gets such great privileges over all others, they should have the same as everyone else.

      Too bad about the previous 200 years of whitefellas destroying their society and taking their land eh?

    148. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a black American of African descent, I have become incredibly disheartened by this imbecilic herd mentality that we have to accept an appellation that is inaccurate. I'm a 5th generation Brooklynite and my wife can trace her lineage back to a plantation in South Carolina. My wife is "African American" and has green eyes and brown hair. So what do either of us have to do with Africa? Our color? Hair texture? I had a girlfriend who wore Kente cloth who did not understand that is it was as misguided as a white orphan wearing lederhosen because she could not accept her identity as an American. Slavery sucked but it is nothing to be ashamed about. Our ancestors had no choice and helped (involuntarily)to form this country and everyone seems to want to forget that. The point I'm attempting to make is that being called AA is a socio-economic classification improperly defined by one's physical attributes. My Caribbean origins and diluted culture cannot be homogenized with my wife's. My daughters culture cannot be homogenized with that of her other AA classmates so lets stop trying to create a "uniform" culture where none exists. My black friend from Alabama cannot relate to my wife's family experiences in Virginia and South Carolina but because of some similar physical attributes they are to be considered a part of a common culture? Unfortunately most blacks in this country are poorer than their white counterparts and often less educated. With that in mind why would anyone find it surprising that a minority group represents a small percentage of an industry that requires an above average level of education.

    149. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the uninitiated:

      The quote is from Blazing Saddles

    150. Re:Who cares? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      And to blame the current population for that simply because of the color of their skin is blatantly racist.

      Here's a little tidbit: my great-great grandfather owned slaves. He had a huge plantation a little over an hour's drive from where I live now. The reality of it though, is that *I* never owned slaves, and have never cracked a whip on anybody. Indeed I have many black friends and 2 cousins who are biracial (my uncle married a black woman).

      In the same regard, no African American alive today was a slave on a plantation. To judge EITHER of us based on our race's connection with past events is racist at it's heart. Let the issue go. The whites of today didn't perpetrate it nor did the blacks of today endure it. The same applies to the situation in Australia. Let history be history and lets all now just be equal people.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    151. Re:Who cares? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Actually, as a Dane, I'd usually go with "black", or quite a lot more likely, their name. In one specific instance, I'd go with 'aunt', but I know that's cheating, on account of her being my aunt. So how many aunts are working in the game industry compared to the total percentage of aunts in the population?

    152. Re:Who cares? by Hucko · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that....

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    153. Re:Who cares? by ivex33 · · Score: 1

      Why I'm Black, Not African American It's time we descendants of slaves brought to the United States let go of the term "African American" and go back to calling ourselves Black - with a capital B. Modern America is home now to millions of immigrants who were born in Africa. Their cultures and identities are split between Africa and the United States. They have last names like Onwughalu and Senkofa. They speak languages like Wolof, Twi, Yoruba and Hausa, and speak English with an accent. They were raised on African cuisine, music, dance and dress styles, customs and family dynamics. Their children often speak or at least understand their parents' native language. Living descendants of slaves in America neither knew their African ancestors nor even have elder relatives who knew them. Most of us worship in Christian churches. Our cuisine is more southern U.S. than Senegalese. Starting with ragtime and jazz, we gave America intoxicating musical beats based on African conceptions of rhythm, but with melody and harmony based on Western traditions. Also, we speak English. Black Americans' home speech is largely based on local dialects of England and Ireland. Africa echoes in the dialect only as a whisper, in certain aspects of sound and melody. A working-class black man in Cincinnati has more in common with a working-class white man in Providence than with a Ghanaian. With the number of African immigrants in the U.S. nearly tripling since 1990, the use of "African American" is becoming increasingly strained. For example, Alan Keyes, the Republican Senate candidate in Illinois, has claimed that as a descendant of slaves, he is the "real" African American, compared with his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, who has an African father and white mother. And the reason Keyes and others are making arguments such as this is rather small, the idea being that "African American" should refer only to people with a history of subordination in this country - as if African immigrants such as Amadou Diallo, who was killed by police while reaching for his wallet, or Caribbean ones such as torture victim Abner Louima have found the U.S. to be the Land of Oz. We are not African to any meaningful extent, but we are not white either - and that is much of why Jesse Jackson's presentation of the term "African American" caught on so fast. It sets us apart from the mainstream. It carries an air of standing protest, a reminder that our ancestors were brought here against their will, that their descendants were treated like animals for centuries, and that we have come a long way since then. But we need a way of sounding those notes with a term that, first, makes some sense and, second, does not insult the actual African Americans taking their place in our country. And our name must also celebrate our history here, in the only place that will ever be our home. To term ourselves as part "African" reinforces a sad implication: that our history is basically slave ships, plantations, lynching, fire hoses in Birmingham, and then South Central, and that we need to look back to Mother Africa to feel good about ourselves. But what about the black business districts that thrived across the country after slavery was abolished? What about Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, W.E.B. Du Bois, Gwendolyn Brooks, Richard Wright and Thurgood Marshall, none born in Africa and all deeply American people? And while we're on Marshall, what about the civil rights revolution, a moral awakening that we gave to ourselves and the nation. My roots trace back to working-class Black people - Americans, not foreigners - and I'm proud of it. I am John Hamilton McWhorter the Fifth. Four men with my name and appearance, doing their best in a segregated America, came before me. They and their dearest are the heritage that I can feel in my heart, and they knew the sidewalks of Philadelphia and Atlanta, not Sierra Leone. So, we will have a name for ourselves - and it should be Black. "Colored" and "Negro" had their good points but carry a whiff of Plessy vs. Ferguson and Bull Connor abo

    154. Re:Who cares? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Wrong. American politics: everyone goes on about what a good Christian they are. European politics: every social problem is blamed (sometimes even justifiably!) on Muslim immigrants.

    155. Re:Who cares? by master_p · · Score: 1

      But not all black people identify with Africa...for an American that has never been there, does not have anything to do with Africa, why should he/she be called African-American? If Malcolm X wanted to refer to himself and his partners like that, he has every right to. But not all people identify themselves as such...

      And then there is the issue of while people coming from Africa. Are they African Americans, as well?

    156. Re:Who cares? by sorak · · Score: 1

      blocks of people in your country who have a separate culture and separate rules that they want to live by And what culture/rules do the people labelled as African Americans live by? Well, have you ever heard Colon Powell or Barak Obama being criticized for "not being black enough"? I don't know if it is constructive to criticize black people who adopt the speech patterns, mannerisms, and dress patterns used in corporate America. After all, doing so seems to be reinforcing negative stereotypes (that they can't be successful at anything technical, sophisticated, or academic in nature), but there really is a black community, and it can be seen in voting patterns, music and clothing trends, linguistic trends and plenty of other ways. I'm not saying that 100% of African-Americans conform to this, or that 0% of whites do, but the trend is there.

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. You can also generalize that they are more likely to live in poverty and to have problems that come with poverty. They may be more likely to face irrational discrimination, or alienation, which may affect their outlook, career choices, financial options, and even life expectancy.

      I don't believe that every issue that affects black culture is caused by racism, but the issues do exist, and it makes more sense to look for an explanation to the correlation than to ignore it entirely.

      Then, there is the fact that African-Americans are more likely to be affected by some diseases and less likely to be affected by others. So, for medical purposes it is useful for doctors to notice if a patient happens to be black.

      Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism. Well, that's just name-calling. The whole point of the debate is to determine if we truly are a society where everyone is created equal, or if we have a class of second-class citizens. I would say that allowing the disparity to happen is more racist than actually taking notice and trying to stop it.
    157. Re:Who cares? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Africa is no more a "continent" than Europe is. It, Europe, Asia Minor, Asia, and India are all part of the same land mass. Africa is quote a lot more a continent than Europe is. Europe is nothing more than a big peninsula on the Eurasian (or just plain Asian) continent, whereas Africa is a full-blown continent with a tiny land bridge to Asia. Africa is as much a continent as North America is.
    158. Re:Who cares? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism. I would agree but it speaks to the prejudice being reversed. Blacks who buy in to this hyphenated label in effect separate themselves further. Black leaders may do this in the name of garnering some kind of respect and culture but like many of their policies they further push a wedge into American culture. It's now spread to "Irish-American," "Italian-American," and so on. There simply is no such thing and it's divisive. It speaks further to the misguided notions of tolerance. Most of the teachings on tolerance start by drawing distinctions between classes or races of people, labeling them, then moving towards notions of acceptance. Acceptance generally occurs in what we share, not what differentiates us. Therefore tolerance teaching should start with the fact that we are more alike than how different we are. Then we have the audacity to bemoan the prejudices we foster. This doesn't even get into the more sinister notions of those who deliberate foster prejudice to gain power.

      I recently watched a portion of the "Conversation on Race" on MSNBC. I found it to be one of the most bigoted attempts at discussing race I'd seen and a clear example of how we're perpetuating racism in this country.
    159. Re:Who cares? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The term was an attempt to classify a people in an increasingly smaller world. Black was not enough because as pointed out, there are Black people in India and Black people in Egypt and Black people in Pakistan, etc. So there was an attempt to differentiate by being African as opposed to Black.

      It does not matter. The bottom line is the distinction is too complicated to put a simple word on. Descendent-of-African-Slave-American is too long and hard to say. Plus, African Americans want to recognize the uniqueness of what they have been through as a group, yet maintain the connection to their African roots. Can't really have it both ways.

      The strange truth is this is likely why the term Nigger is still around. Offensive as it is, its the only term thats used historically and uniquely on this group of people.

    160. Re:Who cares? by RocketRay · · Score: 1

      The gamer is near!

      I knew a guy whose g/f was from South Africa (Afrikaaner). When she went to the DMV she checked "African-American" for ethnicity. The black DMV employee started giving her shit, until in her very SA accent she told her how she was more African cause she was actually born & raised there. She didn't have to check "white" on the form.

    161. Re:Who cares? by dajak · · Score: 1

      Classifying people in such a way doesn't make sense. The only thing you can generalise about African Americans is that their skin is black. Grouping them into a sub-culture based on their ethnicity is really stupid, and a testament to the persisting prejudice that runs through the US. This is a perfect example of modern, widely practised, racism. It's also an almost inevitable consequence of centuries of social stratification that almost completely separated black and white people in the US. There are clear differences between the two subcultures, yet both black and white subcultures in the US are as American as apple pie. There is no reason whatsoever to expect that the consequences of social stratification will immediately disappear just because slavery and racism disappear. The cat is gone but the grin lingers on. More recent immigration of people who don't fit that classification, for instance true Africans, has nothing to do with that: they are not part of that history of social stratification, and understandably don't want to be part of it.

      The US's situation in this respect should be compared to for instance South American countries or South Africa, not to Denmark. Europe is different. It does not have a history of blacks and whites living together for centuries: coloured people are a post-WWII phenomenon. Europe has to learn to either assimilate these newcomers or to successfully deal with their presence through some form of social stratification. Europe does of course have historical experiences with various forms of social stratification based on ethnicity, religion, and language , and with their negative consequences: The idea that most European countries are largely monocultural is also a relatively modern fiction.

      For instance: The historical cause for segregation, and therefore cultural difference, between protestants and catholics here in the Netherlands was a war that ended in 1648, but relations between the two religious factions only started relaxing after WWII. Lesson: Social stratification has a habit of perpetuating itself for no apparent reason until some catastrophe happens. You don't need a constant supply of latent racism to fuel a status quo: it remains the status quo because it is the status quo.
    162. Re:Who cares? by qwan · · Score: 1

      There are no black people in pakistan. The same way there are black people in north India, they are the same region. So get your facts straight. The term is wrong and racist, you can argue otherwise but the truth is that it is.(just like a person who eats egg calls himself a vegetarian and may present many arguments but the fact is that he is eating an unborn fetus) You are right though about the history of the term. They wanted to identify with their african roots that is why the term was invented AND/OR accepted by many Africans. So they really cant have it both ways. The racism is clear calling a person black or brown is racist. Take a look at India south Indians and north Indians are the same race.(or course many argue about the aryan invasion theory but that is bullcr@p) But people int he north are fair and South Indians are dark and get blacker than africans the more south you go(into srilanka). The fact is that the sun is what makes them black. Genetic links are just humbug. We hear lot of stories of people in south india having the same genetic desposition of Nelson mandela(yes that was the headline). But it is just a part of a plan to divide India racially. Our history and not spoken of any race and Indians are of the same race. North Indians may have been cross bred with Mongol /Moghul races thats it. Aryan race does not exist. Those were all wrong interpretations of the meaning of the word arya and also a conspiracy to destroy the very roots of the vedic culture. Coming back to the point the term is definately racist. And like dnoyeb they wanted to be identified with african heritage so they accepted or may have even chosen the word and now they cannot have it both ways.

    163. Re:Who cares? by sm62704 · · Score: 1

      I had a co-worker who was an African-American. He was born in Nigeria. He was a black man, but if he was white he'd still be an African-American.

      Personally if I were black and someone called me an African-American I'd be as offended as I would be now if someone called me a European American. I'm an AMERICAN, damn it, despite my Irish roots.

      Call me an Irish-American and I'll kick your ass. After I get drunk.

      -mcgrew

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    164. Re:Who cares? by Yold · · Score: 1

      I certainly wouldn't call it an anomaly. The "confounding variable" is the poverty spin cycle that afflicts a far larger percentage of blacks than whites. Bluntly speaking, the more impoverished a family is, the lower the chances of that person of graduating from college. Unfortunately, tuition grants do not seem to help to problem.

      There is less of an incentive to go to college, and overall academic motivation is far, far, lower among the poorest of American students. This article points out something that is rather obvious if you look on any college campus, there is a severe lack of participation in science/engineering programs among ethnicities outside of white, asian, and west Indian. Funny that these happen to be the 3 riches ethnic groups in America.

    165. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maddox is the Internet's Carlos Mencia.

      And for those of you who think that's a compliment, gtfo.

    166. Re:Who cares? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

      Yes the quote sounds quite different. However, caring too much about the fidelity of the quote to judge its validity is an argument of authority.

      Personally, I think that this version is quite good and has a very good point, regardless of whoever said it.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    167. Re:Who cares? by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      There are two kinds of people I cannot stand: Those who are intolerant of other cultures, and the Dutch.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    168. Re:Who cares? by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the problem -- the boundaries can never be totally clear-cut. Any journalist worth their salt will ask a person how they want to be identified for a story, even when it would be pretty easy to guess. Is "person of color" an accurate term? The only way to know is to ask the person you're referring to. And the connotations of demographic terminology are always changing; see "United Negro College Fund" and "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People". Even the preference "American Indian" versus "Native American" varies with who you're talking to. Social change is reflected in the language.

      But there's no need to walk on eggshells as long as everyone realizes demographic categorization is mostly edge cases. I guess you could say, use tagging instead of a hierarchy. The tags "black", "brown" and "white" make perfect sense for a passing reference to skin color, but to talk about American racial politics/sociology (as in TFA) you might need a keyword like "African-American" or "Latino". And of course, ask before you tag someone personally.

    169. Re:Who cares? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      And what about a white person with South African and American parents, who has spent half their life in each country? :)

      I really don't know why "black" seems to have become mildly offensive. If people objected by being classified according to visually prominent racial characteristics, I'd understand it but the "African American" categorisation does exactly the same.

    170. Re:Who cares? by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Which I find to be counter-productive to anti-segregation.

      but, that being said, I couldn't care less, and I'm not american.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    171. Re:Who cares? by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      And I'm a white guy who was born in Africa and is now an American citizen. I have no problem referring to myself as African-American just to see the look on a person's face. Or being called white, or telling American born blacks who refer to themselves as African-Americans that they aren't 'African' enough. Silly Rodesian...
      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    172. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.... Who cares whether or not game developers are black, white, blue, green or red... as long as games are being put out for the systems.

    173. Re:Who cares? by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      I prefer the term "American-American".

    174. Re:Who cares? by persicom · · Score: 1

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American? Because you're wrong. See the Italian Americans at the Columbus Day parade, the Irish Americans at the St. Patrick's Day parade, etc...

      Then again, maybe its a NYC thing - in other areas where ethnicity is not as varied, maybe there is no need/desire to subculture yourself
    175. Re:Who cares? by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it cracks me up the lengths some people go in order to avoid convenient labels. There is a group of 4 guys and 1 girl. If trying to point out the girl, they will say "The girl". If 3 of the guys are similarly colored and the 4th is completely differently colored, the same people that would say "The girl" say "The guy standing to the left of the the girl? He has on white sneakers, short hair, drinking a pint of lager?" Because to some people, publicly acknowledging differences in pigmentation is far far worse than secretly hating people of different pigmentation.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    176. Re:Who cares? by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      If you are trying to suggest that Japanese citizens from Nigeria, Brazil, Korea, China or the US are not separated into ethnic groups in Japan for example then your statement couldn't be any further from the truth. They idea that any of these people would be called Japanese is laughable and yes there are populations of Korean, Nigerians etc in Japan.

    177. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is ignorant bigotry from the black community. I heard a guy in Canada (who was an american visa student) call himself and his 'kind' african-canadians. No I will not capitalize that. They made these terms up to allow folks to understand they are children from slavery, ok I can accept that. Oh, whats this? Most blacks today are not slaves? Oh, and they move to other countries and decide to take their bastardized titles with them? They also bring their gangs and ghetto's with them. We have a large community of somalian's who are quite refreshing compared to African-Americans bigotry. How ridiculous that folks feel so inferior that they have to come up with all this bullshit. Besides this article is so factually incorrect it's amazing. I suppose all the Japanese/Korean/Chinese game developers (who where the most dominatant for many many years and still have a great hold on game development) are considered whites since obviously they are not black. Really....WHO CARES? Noone.

    178. Re:Who cares? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Indian characteristics and black characteristics are as dissimilar as dogs and cats. I agree completely; but GP was basically saying 'black' should only be used for color of the skin; and my point was that doing so would be grossly misrepresenting the ethnic background of the majority of people being so represented.
    179. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chinese--discrimination against Uighur and Tibetan citizens" -- Can you add some content to support this statement? Tibetan and Uighur citizens are actually given more privileges than Han people. Exempt from "one child rule" is one of the them.

    180. Re:Who cares? by dwye · · Score: 1

      Do you somehow honestly think that black people living in Alabama have the same "overall traditions, customs, and apparently gaming habits" as black people living in New York City, and them the same as black people living in Chicago?

      Why not? Most blacks living in the north are just two or three generations from their cousins in the Deep South. Enough moved north in the 1940s and 50s that almost every northern black family is also a southern black family.

      It would also be glossing over the important historical fact that many blacks in the north in generations past were never slaves.

      Many in the South, too; slavery ended in the 1860s, after all. As far as having NO slave ancestors, this is fairly rare. The reason that New Englanders were first against slavery was that God clearly disapproved as slaves transported there rarely survived the first winter; thus they had fairly few until escaping slaves started arriving.

      You also ignore the existance of large numbers of free and even slave-owning blacks in Louisiana in 1860, some of whom enlisted (possibly even were commissioned; I would have to check that) and served in their state regiments during the Civil War.

      You can't just take a label like "African American" and slap it on all black people in the US. It is and should be degrading to many.

      Actually, they chose it and used it, IIRC, because "Black" was considered offensively excluding those who were light enough to pass the old paper bag test (in the 1930s, light skinned blacks considered themselves the elite, and only accepted those lighter than the bags).

    181. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call it a matter of statistical probability, all kinds of games never see the light of day outside japan.

      A significantly larger gaming industry based in a region of predominantly Japanese ethnicity, would let you as a matter of simple probability assume that.

      But just in case, some Japanese game companies.

      SquareSoft (responsible for final fantasy, dragon quest, ever quest, kingdom hearts, full metal alchemist.)
      Konami (responsible for castlevania, contra, metalgear, silent hill, Suikoden, and DDR)
      Capcom. Street Fighter. Enough said.

    182. Re:Who cares? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Indian characteristics and black characteristics are as dissimilar as dogs and cats. I agree completely; but GP was basically saying 'black' should only be used for color of the skin; and my point was that doing so would be grossly misrepresenting the ethnic background of the majority of people being so represented.

      I think there's a reasonable limit to cultural acceptance we have to follow. If I call a person "black" I'm not being disparaging, I'm not belittling their cultural background or pissing on their heritage, I'm observing an overt physical characteristic; nothing more, nothing less.

      When somebody calls me white I don't get my back up and tell them I'm a mix of German and Scottish and they'd better check themselves because it doesn't matter. I know where my roots lie and I'll discuss them with a person but I won't use them as a weapon to gain sympathy in a social situation.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    183. Re:Who cares? by jmpeax · · Score: 1

      I just think that finding more ways to emphasise differences between people is the wrong way to a tolerant society. It breeds prejudice and segregation.

      By this logic no-one is American, everyone is [Insert Nth Generation of Relatives' Nationality] American. Even native Americans aren't American, they're Native American. I just think this is ridiculous.

    184. Re:Who cares? by Fivo · · Score: 1
      FWIW, I've heard Cuba actually has a remarkably egalitarian society--at least with regards to race--but it's so hard to hear reliable things about Cuba that I don't know..

      My understanding is this stems from the policy of murdering everyone the government did not approve of, or those that helped liberate the country. Take your pick. :)

    185. Re:Who cares? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasy sucks. Dragon Quest I've never heard of. Everquest sucks (although it was better before Sony got ahold of it). Kingdom Hearts sucks. "Full metal alchemist?" I think I've vaguely heard of that somewhere before.
      Castlevania is ok, so is Contra and Metal Gear. Silent Hill doesn't appeal to me at all. Suikoden I've never heard of. DDR is good.
      Street Fighter is ok.

      I like classic RPGs, the Might and Magic series, the Wizardry series, the Gold Box D&D titles. Those are all developed by Americans. My favorite FPS series is Marathon, developed by Bungie in California. Adventure and Yar's Revenge, the best games evar, was made by Atari.

      Seriously, though, this is all entirely subjective. You like Final Fantasy, I like Morrowind and Oblivion. You like Kingdom Hearts, I'd rather play something like The Longest Journey. You like Contra, I'd rather play Halo. Metal Gear? Splinter Cell. Etc, etc, etc.

    186. Re:Who cares? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Put simply, why is an American with African heritage an African American, when a white American with European heritage is simply American?


      Or just labeled white or caucasian.
      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    187. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well .. I'm a European American since my ancestors came from Europe!

      I always liked that statement. Makes me grin.

    188. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm fond of 'white boy', myself.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    189. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but my daughter's mother is from Sierra Leone, and her father (me) is from the United States, which makes her quite properly an "African-American". Yes, in my book, all those people whose parents were born in the states or have successfully integrated themselves into American culture are simply "American", regardless of whether they look Latino, Black, Oriental, Middle Eastern, European, etc.

    190. Re:Who cares? by Miseph · · Score: 2, Informative

      He must be famous for being a shitty biologist: there's no biological foundation for the social institution of race. Over a century of famous post-Darwin biologists conducting research trying to prove that race is real and scientifically significant has proven only that the entire concept is completely meaningless.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    191. Re:Who cares? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      I think you mean East Indian. My girlfriend is West Indian. It means "she's from da' islands, mon.." I know it can be confusing, I blame Christopher Columbus.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    192. Re:Who cares? by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Well put sir! Well put.

    193. Re:Who cares? by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      Believe he is using this definition. Race 2 a: a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b: a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics

    194. Re:Who cares? by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      Racism is prejudice combined with the power to enforce that prejudice. To act as if the slaveowners' descendants today are not in any way privileged over the slaves' descendents because of their historical inequities, to sweep all of that under the rug and pretend it never happened - THAT'S racist.

    195. Re:Who cares? by westlake · · Score: 1
      If you're going to prattle about how rockstar doesn't have street cred because they don't have a lot of blacks on staff, then your opinion is worth nothing.

      It isn't a question of "street cred" in so crude a sense. It is question of situational awareness. Missed opportunities. If the adolescent white male is a declining percentage of your potential market then you need to know how to reach - and not alienate - a larger audience.

    196. Re:Who cares? by toriver · · Score: 1

      There were some rioting over some newspaper printing some political cartoons allegedly depicting Mohammed (the prophet, not the million others by that name). The newspaper used "freedom of expression" defense, but probably censors a bunch of other things without anyone knowing (e.g. articles which might have put journalists in a bad light etc.)...

      However, those riots were more a continuation of earlier riots in that part of Copenhagen over the tearing down of a youth-occupied building some six months earlier.

    197. Re:Who cares? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If it's a matter of market opportunity, then the best way to get them to change is to sell it as such. This thread seems to be more about looking for hidden bias because there aren't many black programmers. Not that programmers are the only ones building games.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    198. Re:Who cares? by toriver · · Score: 1

      - Where are you from?
      - Knock Knock!
      - Who's there?
      - Yes, our glorious leader Who, and the happy citizens of Knock Knock!

    199. Re:Who cares? by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      If you look up you're history you'll see that most of the wealth of the plantation owners of the old south was destroyed during or shortly after the war. Sure the former slaves didn't have much either, but if you think that most of the plantation owners came out of the war with their nice, pretty house intact with tons of money you're mistaken. Most of them were a broken wreck. Most of the owners that managed to keep their land had just that: the land, and not really any capital funds to do much with.

      In short, the whites in the north weren't really benefiting from slave labor since it wasn't a factor there, and the entire south was so devastated after the war that EVERYONE, whites and blacks alike, had to rebuild their lives from scratch.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    200. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if there is one constant across the world it's racism.. Well, an over-generalisation. Historically in Europe class and (as you mentioned) religion are both more important than race - royalty from other countries will generally be so of higher status than the common or garden European.
    201. Re:Who cares? by fatty+bimble · · Score: 1

      Fact: Ninjas are mammals.

    202. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 1

      While I'm a big fan of McWhorter's books on linguistics, I find myself usually disagreeing with his opinions on race, which I do here as well. That is a nice find, however - a well thought-out counterargument.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    203. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 1

      It suggests that, irrelevant of their personal experiences and lifestyle, knowledge of minor details of their genetic heritage gives major knowledge of their culture, traditions, customs and beliefs.

      Well, yes, and no. I see "African American" or ANY similar term, "French", "Gypsy", "Arab," as a way to say that the people so described have a certain commonality of culture, tradition, custom or belief which sets them apart from others of ostensibly similar genetic heritage. AA's are to some identifiable extent different from other blacks. French people are to some extent different from other Europeans, Arabs different from other Middle Easterners. Not necessarily genetically, but culturally. Of course we accept that not all French eat baguettes, not all Arabs are Muslim, but even so, by and large, we can link a certain population through cultural affinity. If you move to France, your kids, despite their total lack of French racial heritage, will start adopting French customs. Barack Obama, e.g., despite his total lack of "African American" heritage (and I'm aware of the irony), attends an African American church and speaks in AA cadences. He has adopted an AA culture, not the Kenyan or mainstream American cultures of his parents.

      Knowing your racial heritage does not tell me anything about you, and to assume that it does is simply ridiculous.

      I think you're overstating your case. Advertisers make a living on the exact premise that knowing someone's racial heritage in the US and other places is likely to tell you a great deal about their cultural habits. I'm not enamored of his overall politics, but Thomas Sowell has written a highly regarded book on this very subject.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    204. Re:Who cares? by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Then why is it that "Africian Americans" refer to "European Americans" as "white"?

      The short answer to that question is that Europeans made up the term "white" to describe themselves, and non-Europeans have gone along with it.

      I think what irritates people the most about the term "Africian American" is not that it is not particularly accurate, but that it conveys some special social standing that is not equally applied to all other racial groups.

      Of course it is applied to other groups. Italian-American, Haitian-American, Asian-American, Arab American, Greek-American, Nigerian-American, Jewish American, etc. In fact, I used to belong to a bank called "European American Bank" before it was bought out by Citigroup.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    205. Re:Who cares? by paulthomas · · Score: 1

      The question was more out of actual curiosity for who said it than to assail the gp's anecdote; although, I can see how you would get the latter out of my comment.

    206. Re:Who cares? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Sure they can be both, it's just incredibly rare compared to either American or African alone.

    207. Re:Who cares? by c0p0n · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, not trying to be an arsehole here :) but could you explain to me how a black dude born in Bronx can be African? Or how a black lady from Congo in New York can be American?

      I could kind of understand a so-called african-american person if this is someone that just migrated and got the american citizenship (or the other way around), born and raised in Africa but American legally . This is the only case in which African-American is applicable IMO. Any other is just a pretentious artificial separation.

      Returning to the article, it should be "black" people, as it has nothing to do anyway with any strains of "african culture". Not "african american", not "people of colour" (as white is a color too, so is red, yellow...). Black. Let's use proper words. Nothing wrong with black. All wrong with "nigger". Black != nigger.

      --

      Your head a splode
    208. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "instead of being created in God's image like the English were."

      a typical anti 'white english' comment. YOU are part of the problem with attitudes like that. Britain is just like anywhere else. there are plenty of people of all different cultures, colours (note the 'u' - there is a world outside america) and whatever. and you know what, not one 'classification' likes the other. ask anyone in london, leeds, birmingham, sheffield, slough, swindon, cardiff or any major urban centre if there is racial harmony in their town...

      do not have this stereotypical view that Britain is the happy multicultural society our friends in the media would have you believe. it's as fvcked as everywhere else.

    209. Re:Who cares? by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      A certain percentage of the US population is black, therefore it is expected that an equivalent percentage of American game developers are too. If they are not, it indicates some sort confounding variable that might (and in this case almost certainly does) indicate some sort of social inequity that needs to be addressed.

      I hope you're not going to get around to addressing the lack of male nurses.

    210. Re:Who cares? by mink · · Score: 1

      So are you calling for reparations?
      Isn't it just as racist to assume everyone who is of dark skin to be descended from slaves and that all light skinned people are descended from slave owners?
      How many generations will payments be required to make up for the past?
      How can it be proved that the person signing up for payments is actually descended from slaves?
      Are white people exempt if they can trace back the family line and determine that they were nor involved in slavery?
      Do those whites have to prove that their ancestors also did not hire the services of slave owners?
      If a white and a black marry does this cancel out the claims of one and the obligations of the other?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    211. Re:Who cares? by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      They rebuild from scratch, but one can't argue that every aspect of society gets reset to zero, all cultural biases are eliminatd, and the slate is cleared for everyone. White people had privileges during the reconstruction period. Owning land is an advantage; knowing people with political power is an advantage; knowing everybody will do business with you is an advantage; knowing that all the cops have the same color skin as you is an advantage; being able to vote is an advantage; being able to read is an advantage.

    212. Re:Who cares? by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      I'm not calling for reparations, largely since there is no price tag one could put on the injustice of slavery. Forget the logistical implications of distributing funds to "worthy people" - there is simply not a dollar figure the government can pay and then say, "Now everything's okay".

    213. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid, when speaking about people with African ancestry in America? Oh, thanks for sharing your infinite wisdom.

      Also, nowhere is it mentioned that there "had" to be a percentage. If you read the article, no one is saying a quota must be met. However, it is a reality that there a certain amount of people that are recorded as taking part in a specific activity. Then we can look at the data and discuss it.

      Like adults. Hopefully.

      By the way, you asked, "Who cares?"

      I do.

  2. Yes please by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Use these statistics to raise the usual USA fear of racism. You'd think that the US was the only place to have slaves in its history -- get over it.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm "african american", even though I was never alive in africa. I also develop games and program as a hobby.

      The funny thing about the geeks of my generation, is that most of us don't really care about race. You're a noob if you don't know how to recompile your kernel, not because you happened to be born a specific hue.

      Didn't everyone get the memo that the media doesn't really represent the people anymore? There isn't much to get over.

    2. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The difference is - slaves in US were of a specific race, different from that of their masters. So, it is easy to recognize those who descended from slaves, and keep milking the "underprivileged" story forever. Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US. Oh well, every groups of people looks for competitive advantage.

    3. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US wasn't the only place in history, but it was fairly in late in terms of civil rights equality with African Americans...

    4. Re:Yes please by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Probably first order statistic is that few people from poor backgrounds are working as game designers with the statistic that there are few black people working as game designers reflecting this rather than anything else. Now if you wish to use this as an example that there is economic disparity between white and black americans, then it might be valid to do so though there are vastly better statistics that could be used to show that than number of black game developers (doctors, university graduates, etc). I doubt it's the case that black people are facing barriers in the game industry so much as there's a more general economic reason.

      Just to put these statistics in perspective anyway, Wikipedia tells me that black people make up about 12% of the US poopulation. So we're looking at 2% related to this.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Yes please by pembo13 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I thought the topic was about African-American in the US and was based on collected statistics? How am I offtopic?

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:Yes please by akintayo · · Score: 1

      >Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US. Oh well, every groups of people looks for competitive advantage.

      On the flip side, immigrants of European descent are able to benefit from the system of prejudice that benefited the majority white population. Right ?

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    7. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, no Irish, Russian, or Italian immigrants have ever been discriminated against on the basis of their nationality. Since they were white it was all sunshine and lollipops!

    8. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Saturation, not hue. Everyone's skin is pretty close to the same hue, but the amount of melanin changes the saturation, making it lighter or darker. This has interesting consequences for computer vision, and is also pretty much entirely offtopic.

    9. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US.

      What you're saying is that people who discriminate against black people people can tell the difference between american blacks and recent black immigrants, and do not discriminate against recent black immigrants.

      I find that highly unlikely.

      Recent black immigrants to the USA and their children are far more successful (like Obama) than blacks who have been living in the USA for generations. That strongly suggests the problems of the black community are not primarily due to discrimination.

      Oh well, every groups of people looks for competitive advantage.

      Aha. It's all about advantage for yourself, not redress of past wrongs.

    10. Re:Yes please by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      And this was how many hundreds of years ago exactly?

    11. Re:Yes please by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And this was how many hundreds of years ago exactly?

      Since the vast majority of American blacks were systematically and institutionally prevented from achieving any real measure of success? About 60 years.

    12. Re:Yes please by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      So a lot of the people who it actually occurred to are probably dead?

      Why is it still a issue today then?

    13. Re:Yes please by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So a lot of the people who it actually occurred to are probably dead?

      You're joking, right? You think your grandparents' economic and educational opportunities have no effect on where you are now? Poverty is usually multigenerational.

    14. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Depends on who you're talking to. What gets lost in these discussions is that many of the white (and other ethnicity) people that you see today were not slave owners but rather descendants of immigrants, people who came here with little or nothing. And certainly relatively recently. Many people you see today are only 3rd generation americans, if that, and those immigrant ancestors certainly did not come to a land of sunshine and lolipops. They came to a land of uncertainty, hatred, discrimination, poverty and hard work. But these people managed to rise in just 3 generations and quite successfully. Now of course YMMV and things do not always translate from one group to another perfectly. But one would expect to see a rise at least equivalent to that of most second generation americans.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    15. Re:Yes please by asc99c · · Score: 1

      Recent black immigrants to the USA and their children are far more successful

      Here in the UK the same is very much true with people of Indian descent. On the slightly dubious basis of accents, the last two doctors I have seen have been recent immigrants as are some of the software engineers I work with, while typically the Indian people working at the local supermarket speak in a broad Lancashire accent, suggesting their families have been here at least a couple of generations.

      It doesn't prove there is no discrimination, just that a lot of recent immigrants have the training and skills to overcome it. This is mainly due to the points based immigration systems and quotas now used in so many countries.

      If you assume the 'average' American is European descent and then look at the success of recent generations of European immigrants you'll find exactly the same pattern because you have to have a good degree - possibly even a PhD, just to get in.

    16. Re:Yes please by akintayo · · Score: 1

      The mere fact that you refer to Irish, Russian and Italian immigrants rather than European, highlights the difference in how the two groups have been treated, the ease with which they can be identified, and the extent to which they are separated. While there was prejudice, it decreased with subsequent generations and it rarely reached the points where the Blacks, or even the Amerindians, were better off.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    17. Re:Yes please by westlake · · Score: 1
      The funny thing about the geeks of my generation, is that most of us don't really care about race. You're a noob if you don't know how to recompile your kernel, not because you happened to be born a specific hue.

      Yes. But we are talking about video gaming - and a game is more than code. That is the fundamental reason why anything new out of iD looks and plays like a tech demo. Why the original Half-Life remains in print after ten years.

    18. Re:Yes please by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      There's a dark side to it, though. Most geeks I've met seem to think you're weird if you take any particular pride in your ethnic/racial heritage.

    19. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most humans are the same hue (maybe that's why we're called humans.) It's the saturation that varies.

    20. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I can't say that is my experience. In my experience, people love to talk about their heritage if they know about it.

      Unless you are talking about off-the-deep-end types that trace their ancestry back to the Mayflower and try to find other Mayflower ancestors to marry. Yeah, they are weird.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    21. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      keep milking the "underprivileged" story forever. You have a funny definition of "forever", since roughly half of the US population was alive during some portion of Jim Crow. My parents remember a time when segregation was rampant and things like interracial marriage were flat-out illegal in half of the country.

      Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US. Right, because racism is dead in America, right? Give me a break.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    22. Re:Yes please by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Recent black immigrants to the USA and their children are far more successful (like Obama) than blacks who have been living in the USA for generations. That strongly suggests the problems of the black community are not primarily due to discrimination. Hard to say, hard to say. You could argue that the problems of black American communities are not due to today's discrimination, but it's very hard to separate black American culture from its roots in America's past, and those roots obviously include slavery, segregation, and discrimination.

      That is not to place the blame squarely on the shoulders of historic white America, either, but you would be hard pressed to convince me that those past injustices played no role in this current situation.
    23. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      As you say, the conditions are not the same. In the 50s you could find a good paying factory job and be a good hard-working middle-class family. You could probably pay for your kids to go to college.

      Just try coming out of the ghetto with no degree and see how far you get in life today - no matter what race you are.

      I'm not trying to romanticize the 50s or anything, just trying to point out that the economic situation is much different. The service jobs available to poor inner city workers today are not anything like the factory jobs available in the same cities 50 or 60 years ago.

      Also, there ARE a lot of blacks in the US who are in the middle class now - been to Harlem lately? It's a multi-million dollar neighborhood these days. Very expensive and still very black. The black middle class is growing very, very quickly. This is, I believe, because institutionalized racism is finally on the wane.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    24. Re:Yes please by stdarg · · Score: 1
      You should check out some recent studies on economic mobility in America, like this one (pdf). The part from that report I'd like to highlight is:

      Perhaps most notable is that nearly 35 percent of the adult children of parents in the bottom wealth quintile moved up to the top three quintiles, while 41 percent of adult children with parents in the top quintile moved down to the bottom three quintiles. So your grandparents' status definitely has an effect but your economic fate is not as inescapable as you imply.
    25. Re:Yes please by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Usually, but not always. Neither of my parents graduated high school and 3 of 4 of us children have advanced degrees (1 is a dentist). No, I'm not the 1 of 4 with just a high school diploma...fortunately I'm not the dentist either (I'm not putting my hands in anyone's mouth, except my kids' to pull a loose tooth).

    26. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Melanin affects hue as well. Sorry, but pink and brown are separated by more than just saturation.

    27. Re:Yes please by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      >Interestingly enough, new immigrants from African countries get to essentially piggyback onto the same story even when they are not descendants of the slaves and were never subject to discrimination in US. Oh well, every groups of people looks for competitive advantage.

      On the flip side, immigrants of European descent are able to benefit from the system of prejudice that benefited the majority white population. Right ?

      Like the irish (aka white nigger), right? How about the italians? They weren't officially white until recently.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    28. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poverty is only multigenerational in countries like the USA where there is virtually no social welfare or safety net to speak of. In countries where health care and higher education are provided by the state poverty is an escapable trap. I know this first hand as live in Poland, a country which was up step up from the third world thirty years ago, but come look at it now. It's not rich, but opportunities are to be had and any piss poor pig farmer's daughter can get into university (and be further subsidized if she's really piss poor) and wind up a surgeon.

      What's more Poland's welfare system is pretty dire when compared to more progressive countries like Sweden.

      I think once again the American people are giving rectal exams to diagnose a headache. This " are underachieving" attitude to poverty is really just an excuse not to reform a system that's obviously long past breaking point. The USA needs to kick itself in the ass and institute the reforms that all other developed countries undertook decades ago. namely universal health care and free higher education.

    29. Re:Yes please by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, here's the complete story on skin color: First for the base. Human skin in and of itself is fairly translucent. Blood, however, is fairly red, leaving a pinkish hue. There's a brown pigment (melanin) and a yellow pigment. It's the presence of the yellow pigment that changes the hue between east Asians and Europeans, and the degree of melanin that changes the saturation.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    30. Re:Yes please by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Finding Mayflower ancestors to marry seems like a fool's errand. They're all dead. Or did you mean "descendants"?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    31. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Heh, yeah. The people seeking to mate with Mayflower ancestors are even more disturbing :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      As you say, the conditions are not the same. In the 50s you could find a good paying factory job and be a good hard-working middle-class family. You could probably pay for your kids to go to college.

      You can do that today too. The problem is, we've changed what we perceive as necessary. In the 50s, chances were you shared a room with your siblings, your house had one bathroom, your family had one car. There was one TV, food was made at home rather than eaten out, and things weren't bought new every 2-3 years. Also, most people owned their homes for longer than the 6-8 years that people these days do, when you got too much shit, you didn't move into a bigger house, you sold some stuff.

      It's not so these days. Your average house has 2 TVs, 2 cars, a minimum of 2 computers, gameboys for each of the kids, a Wii and an Xbox 360. The home audio system is a brand new surround sound system and oh by the way, all those cars, tvs and toys were bought on credit.

      Middle class living today doesn't correlate with middle class wages. And the problem isn't the wages, its the people trying to live above and beyond their means.

      Just try coming out of the ghetto with no degree and see how far you get in life today - no matter what race you are.


      I didn't come out of the ghetto, but I did come out of a lower class family (one working parent, the other sunk a lot of money into a failed business). I have no college degree (dropped out) and in 3 years I've gone from bringing in $8/hr part time to a full time middle class income. It really isn't difficult, it just takes proper budgeting, proper living and dedication to your job and task at hand.

      Also, there ARE a lot of blacks in the US who are in the middle class now - been to Harlem lately? It's a multi-million dollar neighborhood these days. Very expensive and still very black. The black middle class is growing very, very quickly. This is, I believe, because institutionalized racism is finally on the wane.

      And yet there are so many who aren't. Racism has been on the wane for quite some time now, the problem is applying one self to things. Bill Cosby goes around the country talking about this, and he's right. There are some great videos of his speeches up on line, but it boils down to one main point, no one is holding anyone down these days except themselves.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    33. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Higher education here is really easy to get. The problem is this belief that you need to go to college to succeed. Also there's this unfortunate belief that going to college means you need to go to Harvard. When I was being pushed into college, I looked into the bigger schools because the idea of going to a small school, or god forbid a community college, was unthinkable. If I wanted to succeed I needed a degree from a college with prestige. In the end, I wasted 3 years pursuing that degree before I realized it was a waste of money and dropped out. I then went a got myself a nice middle class job, and now I take classes at various higher ed places not to get a degree and get a better job, but to actually learn things that interest me. And even better I can pay for it in cash because I worked my way into a job that gives me that sort of income. And as I continue to work my way up the ladder, when I reach a position where I "need" a degree, they will pay for it.

      If you want to go to college in this country you can. And almost without fail you can do it without paying for it yourself. Someone will always pay for it, you just have to work for it.

      This belief that somehow college is unattainable in the US is false. In the absolute worst case scenario (too rich to qualify for aid, assistance and other programs, too poor to get parents to pay, too lazy to fill out scholarship apps, too unemployed to get payed by your company, and too "privileged" to qualify for minority scholarships) there are multitudes of banks all willing to lend you all sorts of money at reasonable interest rates that you don't need to pay back until you graduate. And you might say that isn't a solution because then you have to pay back the loans, but I say if getting your degree didn't enable you to pay back those loans, then it was a lousy investment.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    34. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You can do that today too. The problem is, we've changed what we perceive as necessary. No you can't... A job at Denny's as a bus boy will simply not pay as much as a job at "Generous Motors" did in the ol' days, despite the educational requirements being the same.

      One of the custodial guys where I used to work works a day job assembling umbrellas in North Philly for a whopping $9/hour and no benefits. He then commutes out to the 'burbs by bus for 45 minutes to clean the office at the same rate. The man is lucky if he pulls in $28k/year. He doesn't have a car, and he rents a place in a crappy part of town.

      I'm not saying his situation is impossible, but it's much different than having a factory income with benefits that let your wife stay home to raise the kids.

      it just takes proper budgeting, proper living and dedication to your job and task at hand. You are a success story, and that's great. Statistically, though, you are probably in the minority. Even you have the distinct advantage of not having to grow up in the ghetto. You were surrounded by role models who showed you what could be. You (presumably) did not have to support kids while making $8/hr.

      And yet there are so many who aren't. This isn't as true as it once was. Only 1 in 5 blacks live in the city anymore. Much of the blame for the dismal earnings statistics lies in demographics; blacks disproportionately live in the poor Southern states. When compared with whites in the same demographic areas, they fare quite well - actually surpassing whites in many areas. For instance, 15 years ago in Queens.

      no one is holding anyone down these days except themselves. That's not entirely true, but is becoming more and more true every day. I think that is why you are seeing a huge spike in the black middle class. It's not like there is something about black character that makes a black person more or less likely to be impoverished than someone descended from potato-famine Irish. And it's not like the Irish have completely shed their stereotypical image of being lazy alcoholics - even all these years later.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      No you can't... A job at Denny's as a bus boy will simply not pay as much as a job at "Generous Motors" did in the ol' days, despite the educational requirements being the same.


      A job at Denny's isn't a job at GM either. People got into GM to make a career. Very few people, even those poor and down and out look at Denny's as a career. If you don't intend on it being one, it won't be. But if you put yourself on a career path, you will have a career.

      One of the custodial guys where I used to work works a day job assembling umbrellas in North Philly for a whopping $9/hour and no benefits. He then commutes out to the 'burbs by bus for 45 minutes to clean the office at the same rate. The man is lucky if he pulls in $28k/year. He doesn't have a car, and he rents a place in a crappy part of town.


      And if he sets aside a little bit of money, he can save up, and in the mean time he's building experience. As long as he pays attention, he will move up in society. But if he spends all his paychecks on toys, and just does enough to keep his job, of course he will never move up. You don't move up by doing the same thing you've always done.

      You also don't get anywhere in life if you settle for the status quo. If he's not happy with the jobs he has and money he earns, he should always be on the look out for something better, and take it when it comes. During the time that I worked part time (with no benefits I might add) I spent some time every day looking at other openings out there. If one came up, I put my name in. Did I always get a call? No of course not, but I was guaranteed to not get a call if I didn't put my name in in the first place.

      You are a success story, and that's great. Statistically, though, you are probably in the minority.

      The only reason that's so is because most people don't try. You don't get born into management, you work your way there. I didn't do anything remarkable or amazing to get where I am, I just kept pushing forward. That whole saying, "you make your own success" is perfectly true. Opportunities don't come knocking, you get off your ass and find them.

      Even you have the distinct advantage of not having to grow up in the ghetto. You were surrounded by role models who showed you what could be.

      I was also surrounded by people who showed me what I could be if I screwed up. Ultimately parenting and role models play a large part sure, but at some point, you as a person have to look around you, see the people who are miserable and decide you don't want that for your life, and then do everything you can to avoid their mistakes. I didn't learn my financial management from my parents, they weren't any good at it. What I did do was see that they weren't good at it, and vowed not to be like that, and then sought knowledge elsewhere.

      At some point you have to stop blaming everyone else and take charge of your own life. If where you are, or who you associate with or what you do isn't working, then change it. Yeah, working denny's in a dead end town living out of a hole in the wall shit box sucks, so get out of the dead end town. What do you have to lose? Every town has a denny's and shit hole boxes, so move somewhere else, try for new and different opportunities. If denny's isn't paying you enough, ask for a raise or look for another job. It's not like your Denny's job is some prize that you couldn't get again. IF hanging out with the druggies is bringing you down, stop hanging out with them.

      You (presumably) did not have to support kids while making $8/hr.

      No, I didn't, but I did support an out of work, disabled fiance. But that, and kids are choices. No one forces you to have kids, and no one forced me to get engaged, but if that is a choice you make, then you should be prepared to deal with the consequences of that choice.

      Look, if you're pulling $8/hr part time while trying to support a kid on your own, I don't feel sorry for you. I feel sorry for your kids, but obviously you're messing up

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    36. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Look, if you're pulling $8/hr part time while trying to support a kid on your own, I don't feel sorry for you. That's easy for you to say if your man hasn't run out on you and he was the breadwinner while you stayed home with the kids.

      You are also ignoring the fact that people DO try just as hard as you did, but fail. Sometimes trying isn't enough. Have you ever considered that you may be a bit lucky? That some of your choices were fortunate as well as smart? That you were born with an IQ that enabled you to make good choices? That your parents didn't abuse alcohol or drugs while you were in the womb? That you didn't like in an area contaminated by lead, mercury or other chemicals?

      Try hard is good advice, but sometimes it fails. Sometimes people aren't strong enough to handle the pressure. Not everyone is physically equipped to handle what life throws at them. Depression and despair are emotions that all people are susceptible to.

      I'm not talking about a magical force. I'm talking about a very real force, measurable, called racism. If you have not experienced it, you are not looking or you live in a homogeneous place. Can you honestly say you don't know any racist people? When I've complained about neighbors, I've had people ask me if they were black.

      The very fact that we all seem to accept that Obama is "black" when his mother is white indicates a sick society - on both sides of the color spectrum.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re:Yes please by toriver · · Score: 1

      The FIRST slaves, sure. Later, less privileged ex-Europeans, and Chinese, were used as what was the rebranded slavery of "indentured servitude" where your meagre salaries were eaten up by the company store you were forced to buy goods from - and that you got a hefty debt to.

    38. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      That's easy for you to say if your man hasn't run out on you and he was the breadwinner while you stayed home with the kids.

      Move in with friends, family or co-workers. No one has to do this on their own. Again, we're talking about choices, and yes, you can't control people but don't you think its odd that a substantial number of children are being raised in single family homes? Do you really think that all of these people were just abandoned by their spouse with the kids? That there are that many people who are psychotic enough to do that? I think its choices. If you put yourself into a bad relationship, you chose that. If you have kids with someone who is untrustworthy, you chose that. And when they do leave you, if you don't move or rearrange your life to make it so that you can succeed while caring for your kids, those are again choices you make. There are always warning signs about these things. It's high time we started taking people to task for ignoring them. Yes I feel sorry for the kid, that doesn't mean I have to feel sorry for you too.

      Hows this for a true story. Teenage girl from a broken home followed her husband in the military overseas. Her husband was abusive, and a drug addict, and then abandoned her with a toddler. She continued to make mistakes, got in with a bad crowd and had another child. Then she realized what the hell she was doing, and turned her life around. She got her ass back to the states, and moved in with her ex's parents. She busted her ass, worked many jobs to the point where the doctors told her she needed to cut back or she would kill herself. She put herself in school, made friends with a co-worker and moved into an apartment with said co-worker. She never stopped, always looked for that next rung to grab. She's now a paralegal and both kids are grown up and healthy.

      The point is, I've seen a lot of varied situations. But I have never once in my life, seen a situation that could not be improved by choosing to do things a little differently. Perhaps such situations exist, in fact, I'm sure they do. But to say that it's so rampant that so many people across the country for multiple generations can't overcome it? That I just don't believe.

      You are also ignoring the fact that people DO try just as hard as you did, but fail.

      The only people that fail are those that give up. Again, you're suggesting that so many people around the country are making good decisions and something is just keeping them down. I don't buy it. Find me your worst sob story, and I can find things that you can change to make it better.

      Sometimes trying isn't enough. Have you ever considered that you may be a bit lucky? That some of your choices were fortunate as well as smart?

      Fortune and luck are only small parts, and often what seems like luck is just making the right decision. I mentioned before my fiance was disabled. She can't work jobs that are physically taxing. She also has no degree, so for the most part, physically taxing jobs (serving, retail etc) are all that's available to her. The problem was though, we kept making the wrong choice. For 2 years all we did was look into those jobs, because that's what she had in the past. Then we decided instead to try a different tack, and on the first hit landed a job that not only pays better than all of the previous jobs, but is less physically demanding and more her style. It's not luck, it's different choices.

      That you were born with an IQ that enabled you to make good choices?

      Even the smallest child knows that if what they are trying doesn't work, that they need to try something else.

      That your parents didn't abuse alcohol or drugs while you were in the womb?

      How long should one be allowed to use the failings of their parents as the reason they fail?

      That you didn't like in an area contaminated by lead, mercury or other chemicals?


      And how many of the people currently living in poverty can lay claim to all of that? As I said, I

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    39. Re:Yes please by nomadic · · Score: 1

      And if he sets aside a little bit of money, he can save up, and in the mean time he's building experience. As long as he pays attention, he will move up in society. But if he spends all his paychecks on toys, and just does enough to keep his job, of course he will never move up. You don't move up by doing the same thing you've always done.

      That is just flat out wrong. Janitorial work does not move you up in society, it doesn't give you enough money to buy toys, and it certainly does not reward good work. I'm guessing you came from a very privileged background.

    40. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Move in with friends, family or co-workers. No one has to do this on their own.

      They do this. Their friends and family are also dirt-poor and can't really help with the childcare. I think that you'll find a large number of single moms living with their single mom. Poor-as-dirt mom doesn't exactly have a nest egg herself.

      Do you really think that all of these people were just abandoned by their spouse with the kids?

      No. A lot of them are teenage mothers. There are exceptions, but teenage pregnancy is largely a problem with parenting. A teenage girl is simply not equipped to be thrown out into the world. Having a baby at 14 or 16 severely crimps your career choices.

      Yes I feel sorry for the kid, that doesn't mean I have to feel sorry for you too.

      I'm asking you to feel sorry for the kid. Or at least understand that a kid with little or no parenting is not going to have as good a chance at life as an adult.

      She's now a paralegal and both kids are grown up and healthy.

      That's great and even inspirational, but not statistically likely. A lot of people would not be able to handle that situation - simply not equipped. Expecting everyone to be able to do that is like expecting everyone to be proficient at guitar. Also, you make no mention of her background. Someone with a good background might be better equipped to pull themselves out of a hole than someone who has never been exposed to the "good life".

      The only people that fail are those that give up.

      That is simply not true. That is a platitude. Lots of people fail. Bad luck, no brains, bad health... lots of reasons. Not everyone is equipped to succeed at making money. Making money is just like any other endeavor. I can practice as much as I like - I'll never play ball professionally or play an instrument in a major orchestra.

      But to say that it's so rampant that so many people across the country for multiple generations can't overcome it?

      Who isn't overcoming it? My mother is the generation that saw the civil rights movement in the US. In her generation, she saw blacks go from so completely marginalized that they couldn't even use the same bathroom, so who knows... maybe President? In one single person's lifetime! I'm 2nd generation, and I've seen a black middle class emerge where none existed. My grandparents would have been absolutely shocked to see a black doctor or lawyer in any mainstream setting, and in just a few decades it's now so commonplace that people wouldn't even look twice. If this rate of progress continues, my daughter may see people stop talking about black vs. white incomes altogether. How can you possibly argue that blacks aren't improving their lot in life?

      EVERYONE can do better than abject poverty.

      Maybe at a Tony Robbins event, but not in the real world. Be careful with absolutes.

      I've known plenty of racist people. So what? It's just another obstacle to avoid or overcome.

      An obstacle that, in general, whites don't have to overcome.

      If you find racism is harming you, move somewhere else. Get out of there.

      Away from your family, friends, and support structure? Does that sound like the type of thing an impoverished person can easily do?

      A racist manager doesn't stop you from succeeding at another job.

      But it reduces the number of jobs you can be successful at by one per racist manager. A competing white employee rarely sees this impediment.

      A racist landlord doesn't keep you from finding another place to live.

      A whole neighborhood full of racist landlords might keep you from finding a place to live - at least anywhere nice. Thankfully, this seems to be on the severe decline.

      As Bill Cosby put it (paraphrased) "When you tell a black kid who's studying that he's 'acting white', what are you telling him about black people?"

      Nerds are

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    41. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      They do this. Their friends and family are also dirt-poor and can't really help with the childcare. I think that you'll find a large number of single moms living with their single mom. Poor-as-dirt mom doesn't exactly have a nest egg herself.

      You don't need a nest egg, you need something to lower your cost of living so that you can build a nest egg.

      No. A lot of them are teenage mothers. There are exceptions, but teenage pregnancy is largely a problem with parenting. A teenage girl is simply not equipped to be thrown out into the world. Having a baby at 14 or 16 severely crimps your career choices.

      Take away the child. Teenage pregnancy has always been a problem, but years ago, the child was taken away and adopted, either by family or by strangers. These days we let teenage girls ruin their lives and then wonder why they live in poverty. Look, I know it sounds cruel, but if a mother isn't equipped to be raising her child, then she is abusing that child and the child needs to be taken out of that situation.

      I'm asking you to feel sorry for the kid. Or at least understand that a kid with little or no parenting is not going to have as good a chance at life as an adult.

      Which is why I say take these kids away. Get them into a home where they have a chance. Let's stop pretending that if we throw money or laws at this that it will change the fact that as you said, these people aren't equipped to be parents.

      That's great and even inspirational, but not statistically likely. A lot of people would not be able to handle that situation - simply not equipped. Expecting everyone to be able to do that is like expecting everyone to be proficient at guitar. Also, you make no mention of her background. Someone with a good background might be better equipped to pull themselves out of a hole than someone who has never been exposed to the "good life".

      I said broken home, but if you would like to know what that means, try an abusive alcoholic father, who didn't want a girl in the first place and made her sleep on a cot in the kitchen because girls didn't deserve to have their own rooms.

      And really what is so remarkable about that story that no one else could accomplish? I'm not asking people to become overnight millionaires, but simply moving from unable to feed yourself to self supportive should not be this difficult.

      I don't expect everyone to become paralegals. I do expect them to better themselves, and if they CHOOSE to bring offspring into this world, set those children up for a chance to be better.

      That is simply not true. That is a platitude. Lots of people fail. Bad luck, no brains, bad health... lots of reasons. Not everyone is equipped to succeed at making money. Making money is just like any other endeavor. I can practice as much as I like - I'll never play ball professionally or play an instrument in a major orchestra.

      Making lots of money isn't required to make you more successful. You don't have to play ball professionally and you don't have to play in a major orchestra, and you don't have to be CEO of a company. When you are on the bottom rung of society, ANYTHING is an improvement, so when you're sitting there wallowing in the same filth that your grandparents, and your parents before you wallowed in, the only realistic explanation is that you have allowed yourself to fail.

      Maybe at a Tony Robbins event, but not in the real world. Be careful with absolutes.

      And it is with this defeatist attitude that people are defeated. Look the real world is harsh to everyone, some people get more second chances than others, but everyone can get somewhere in life if they work at it. Not try, but actually do. Does it mean you might have to make sacrifices? Sure, but name for me a single success story you've heard where the protagonist hasn't had to make a sacrifice. They don't exist. It's no coincidence that every success story you hear follows the same basic pattern, someone crawling hand over fist to make the

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    42. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You don't need a nest egg, you need something to lower your cost of living so that you can build a nest egg. Lower your cost of living? Below ghetto poverty conditions? I don't think you are being realistic.

      Take away the child. Now you are just being silly. Even if I agreed that it was a good idea for a government to take away people's children as a precautionary measure, it is politically impossible. I can hear the "cultural genocide" claims right now.

      Why not take your support system with you? You can't force other people to do what you want? Each of those people also has a support system which is different from yours, and they would have to do the same.

      Whole families DO leave, but it's not as easy as you seem to think it is to just pick up and leave.

      The child is not hers. Well, it's certainly not yours. Generally, the guardianship of the child would become whoever is the guardian of the mother. So if a 14-year-old has a kid, the mother of the 14-year-old becomes its guardian.

      Still doesn't help with the poverty situation.

      We all deal with it in some way or another, and only those that give up are ever truly held back by it. Right, so EVERYONE has to deal with favoritism. We are all equal when we have to deal with general favoritism. However, blacks have the ADDITIONAL burden of racism. In aggregate, this is going to serve as an obstacle, even if certain individuals can overcome it. The fact is that, on the whole, there are fewer opportunities available to blacks than to whites. ESPECIALLY when you consider that blacks are over-represented in the poorest states, where whites are also poor as dirt.

      But running around saying that you can't make it in life because you got lead poisoning or have asthma is just making excuses. A population with lead poisoning will be at a competitive disadvantage compared to a population without lead poisoning. You can shout "work harder" all you want at the disadvantaged population, but it won't change the fact that they have a disadvantage.

      Take the child away, and tie her tubes if you have to, castrate the guy. I'm beginning to think that you are very, very sick.

      But when they tease the nerd, they don't tell him he's betraying his white brethren. There's a very important distinction between calling a black kid a nerd, and calling him a whitey. As I said, our society is sick. In studies, black children prefer white kids to black kids.

      Our society is sick because we can't have an honest discussion about poverty, race and personal responsibility. Agreed.

      Because when anyone suggests that what is happening may go beyond simple racism, they're ostracized and cast out of the discussion. But you are doing the exact same thing on the other side - arguing that racism should not be an impediment at all. I agree that poverty is not caused by racism alone, but to ignore it as a component is pretty ignorant of reality. Racism is alive and well. We are going the right direction, but it is not yet extinct.

      How can we in this country have an honest discussion when this is the result of honesty? Agreed. Or when Obama talks about his white grandmother and people fly off the handle. It doesn't make any sense.

      But I think you really need to think through the consequences of you "solution" involving forced sterility and taking away people's children. That is scary, scary stuff if you've studied history. You may not be happy with the people who share your opinion.

      I think we can end the cycle of black urban poverty in the US by doing what we are doing right now:
      1. Improving education
      2. Improved housing programs (don't just "stack the poor")
      3. Improving the environment
      4. Programs such as affirmative action to identify and help combat racism.

      I'm probably missing something, but the progress that blacks have made since the late 60's is stunning.

      I'm not sure what to do about rural poverty (black or white).
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    43. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Lower your cost of living? Below ghetto poverty conditions? I don't think you are being realistic.

      Rent / 2 Now you are just being silly. Even if I agreed that it was a good idea for a government to take away people's children as a precautionary measure, it is politically impossible. I can hear the "cultural genocide" claims right now.

      Why am I being silly? What's silly about taking a child out of a neglectful situation? Why is neglecting your child somehow less bad if you do it because you're poor rather than lazy? As far as politically impossible, america needs to get over feel good bullshit and get back to doing the practical thing. The one measure that we can get hard numbers on when it comes to being a parent is being able to afford to be a parent. Why then shouldn't we as a society take the practical approach to preventing poverty?

      I know it doesn't sound like it, but I'm the last person in the world who wants more government programs and intervention, and I certainly don't relish the thought of the government determining who can be a parent. But if you are going to tell me that it's the government's job to help eliminate poverty, then we need to go all the way, none of this pussy footing around bullshit. We will stop poverty by not making more poor people. And don't give me this bullshit about reproductive rights. You have a right to reproduce if and only if you can provide for your offspring. Otherwise you are committing CHILD ABUSE. Starving your child because you are poor is no morally better than starving your child because you are a psychopath.

      You can't force other people to do what you want? Each of those people also has a support system which is different from yours, and they would have to do the same.

      If they aren't improving their lives, then certainly one would think they would want to move on too. Again it comes down to choices, if your support system is any good, it will help you, not hold you in the same place. But if you choose to make your support system a system of people that aren't helping you make your situation better and vice versa, that is your choice.

      Whole families DO leave, but it's not as easy as you seem to think it is to just pick up and leave.

      And living in abject poverty, wondering if you'll be able to afford food next month is easier? Of course it isn't easy but we're talking about your life here. What is your life worth to you? Why isn't your life, why isn't the life of your children worth that hardship? You're just making excuses again.

      Well, it's certainly not yours. Generally, the guardianship of the child would become whoever is the guardian of the mother. So if a 14-year-old has a kid, the mother of the 14-year-old becomes its guardian.

      Still doesn't help with the poverty situation.


      If the mother can't afford to care for the kid, then she doesn't get the child either. Don't you understand? The reason these people remain poor is we allow them to continue to choose to be poor AND to add more poor people to the mix. If 14 year old Jane has a kid because she's raised in a crappy home and her mom Paula can't afford to raise her own kid let alone Jane's then you get the kid out of there. A child shouldn't have to choose between their own family and a family that can support them. They should be able to get both. And if they can't, then the family who can't support them is abusing that child. Surely you agree that children should be removed from those that abuse and neglect them, so why is this any different?.

      Right, so EVERYONE has to deal with favoritism. We are all equal when we have to deal with general favoritism. However, blacks have the ADDITIONAL burden of racism. In aggregate, this is going to serve as an obstacle, even if certain individuals can overcome it.

      And this is where you and I very much disagree. I find that on the whole, racism is limited to very select and specific instances and individuals. That being the case why would you think that these sel

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    44. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Nope. I didn't. Nothing I can say will convince you of that I'm sure. But I did come from a background where I was told no one will make my life easier. My life is my responsibility and if I want it to get better, no one else will make that happen except me.

      As far as janitorial work, goes, monster.com seems to show that janitorial work across the country, entry level, not senior/management level, brings in between 20-30k/ year depending on where you live (20k being places like alabama, louisiana, and 30K being places like california, new york).

      Now, that isn't much to be sure, but for reference that's ~$9.50/hour on the low end and ~$14.50/hour. It's better than flipping burgers and serving food, and when you consider the median incomes in the country, its as good or better than the median for people with a highschool diploma. For a single person it's more than enough to support yourself and put a little bit away. Get a roommate to split the costs of living and you will live quite comfortably if you manage your money right.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    45. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1
      Okay, I'm having trouble getting past the castration/child removal thing.
      1. You are castrating/taking away kids without proof of harm. This violates innocent until proven guilty.
      2. You are giving the government permission to determine what kind of people can and cannot have kids. Do you really need me to go into why this is a slippery slope?
      3. Cast aside ideological objections for a moment. As a practical matter, this will force the people you are trying to help into hiding their kids from the government. That means no health care, no school, etc. They will be worse off than they were before.
      4. Your "solution" is completely untenable politically. Never in a million years will people sign on to this... why pursue it?

      The government should help lift people out of poverty - not eradicate it at any cost. People should always be able to reject government intervention. I mean, you could end poverty by killing all of the poor people. But just because it is effective doesn't make it the right course of action.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    46. Re:Yes please by VoltCurve · · Score: 0

      Then they will die. Natural selection is... natural.

    47. Re:Yes please by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm having trouble getting past the castration/child removal thing.

      Thats OK. I figured you would, most people reasonably would. Like I said, I don't like government intervention, so when the government has to get involved, it should be a horrible experience, so that people will do everything in their power to make it so the government won't be involved.

      You are castrating/taking away kids without proof of harm. This violates innocent until proven guilty.

      Bringing a child into this world you can not financially support is proof of harm. Take them to court if you want, but seriously, this is probably the only part of being a parent we can reasonably quantify. We should use that to our advantage.

      You are giving the government permission to determine what kind of people can and cannot have kids. Do you really need me to go into why this is a slippery slope?

      No, I'm well aware of the slippery slope, as I said, I don't relish the thought, but we're sliding down other slopes that are less effective at solving the problem and more dangerous to our rights.

      Cast aside ideological objections for a moment. As a practical matter, this will force the people you are trying to help into hiding their kids from the government. That means no health care, no school, etc. They will be worse off than they were before.

      They already have no healthcare or schooling. Besides, as I said, if you're bringing a child into this world unable to support them, you're a criminal, we don't stop pursuing criminals just because they go into hiding and try and make it more difficult to stop them.

      Your "solution" is completely untenable politically. Never in a million years will people sign on to this... why pursue it?

      To force people to pay attention and shape up on their own. Gun rights activists police their own very carefully because the threat of government stepping in for them is very real. Same with the ESRB. Society should view reproducing when you can't support kids the same way. Something to be policed carefully because the government solution is worse.

      The government should help lift people out of poverty - not eradicate it at any cost.

      And what better way to life them out of poverty than remove them from it at birth?

      People should always be able to reject government intervention.

      They can reject government intervention. Don't become a child abuser and the government doesn't intervene.

      I mean, you could end poverty by killing all of the poor people. But just because it is effective doesn't make it the right course of action.

      Well, abusing yourself isn't a crime, so killing poor people doesn't make sense, nor does it acknowledge that those people can change their lot in life. But as you said, kids are different.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    48. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      People don't die in the US from starvation. At least, it's not common.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    49. Re:Yes please by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't like government intervention, And yet you promote an unprecedented expansion of the US government...

      Bringing a child into this world you can not financially support is proof of harm. Okay, so you want to make being a poor parent a crime. Fair enough. Now, how are you going to police this? Going through hospital records won't work, because people won't go to hospitals anymore to have their kids if they have any intention of keeping them. Going through school records won't work, because they aren't going to enroll them in school if they'll get taken away - and in any event, you'd be 5 years too late at that point.

      The only way you could effectively find these kids would be mandatory government inspections, probably every year. The inspections would have to be random, or people would just hide the kids. I suppose you could sweep entire neighborhoods, like they do in Iraq when looking for guerrillas.

      Now then, what do you base the ability to raise a kid on? Income? What if you live in a rural area and grow your own food? How would you prove that you can grow enough food?

      What if a man loses his job? Do you take his kids away until he gets another job?

      Have you really thought this through? Is this a government you want to live under? It sounds like some Orwellian nightmare to me.

      but we're sliding down other slopes that are less effective at solving the problem and more dangerous to our rights. How is providing housing to the poor dangerous to our rights? How is improving schools dangerous to our rights? How is cleaning up urban environments dangerous to our rights? Fighting racism? You are wrong - our rights are not being eroded by our current approach to fighting poverty. You may be right that it isn't happening as quickly as it could, but I won't give up my rights just to fight poverty. I'm willing to help people, but not live under authoritarian rule.

      They already have no healthcare or schooling. You are wrong. They get free prenatal care. They are born in a hospital, where they are properly documented. They get free inoculations. They can walk into an emergency room at any time and not be denied care. They get free schooling through the age of 18, and the overwhelming majority stay through at least their 16th birthday.

      All of that would disappear. You would have thousands of undocumented, uneducated kids living with no inoculations in hiding. What a public health nightmare! Talk about sustaining the poverty cycle!
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    50. Re:Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend was born in Russia but raised in the US. I am a US citizen with an eastern European last name. People will treat you with prejudice, even in 2008. A lot of people in the US are still living in the cold war. I have seen that and lived that.

  3. Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why must everything be devolved down to race? I do not care if developers are black, white, green, purple, etc.. as long as they make a good quality product. The question should be, are the developers putting out a quality product? In my honest opinion, game developers fail in this task 60% of the time. It may sound like I do not want Diversity, on the contrary, I want diversity. Diversity is what helps keep things fresh and new. I just think we spend too much time worrying about race and not enough on quality. This is my opinion, like any opinion, it may not please everyone. No offense is intended or meant.

    1. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more with your opinion.

    2. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Criliric · · Score: 3, Funny

      whoa whoa whoa, lets not get to hasty here.... I don't think those weird purple people have EVER made anything decent

    3. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Now that's just libellous!

      I have myself had an excellent vodka and coke made by a perfectly ordinary drunk Irishman.

      I'm sure it was really the Atlantic sea breeze that made his complexion such a lovely purple colour.

    4. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to dismiss a real problem. You didn't read the article, did you. You know why people are worrying about race? Because it affects them personally in all kinds of negative ways. Handwaving and saying "oh quit worrying about it" is just another way of saying "get over it."

    5. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're claiming that 40% of video games are quality products? That's an amazing success rate, one to be applauded!

    6. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't hear anyone complaining that a lot of basketball teams are mostly (or at least disproportionately African-American). Chances are its that way because they have the most talent and not cause the coach hates whites. I would hope by this point any reasonable company would hire based on skills and not on some basis as ignorant as race. If there aren't a lot of African-American game programmers, its probably because there weren't any qualified candidates that applied, that there are higher caulcasian per capita in the area, or because perhaps African-Americans are perhaps less inclined to the line of work (seen arguments along these lines for women so maybe it applies here too?).

    7. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Handwaving and saying "oh quit worrying about it" is just another way of saying "get over it."


      "Stop whining" is another good one. Any of them can be applied quite well to this article, but I like it the most.

      It was a group of black developers complaining about stereotyping, and a female black developer patting herself on the back for being black and getting a CS degree.

      Because it affects them personally in all kinds of negative ways.

      That's certainly what they're saying, but I'm not seeing it. My CS and math classes started out with blacks making up about a third of each class. After midterms, over half of them disappeared. This is with left-leaning teachers who definitely were not going to be unfair to them, and with tutors and classmates who were willing to help them.

      Maybe the fact that they're convinced everyone else is out to hold them down has something to do with it?
    8. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't hear anyone complaining that a lot of basketball teams are mostly (or at least disproportionately African-American). Chances are its that way because they have the most talent and not cause the coach hates whites.

      Or, perhaps black kids tend to grow up in a culture that idolizes basketball, they see it as a desirable career choice, and they spend a lot of time playing basketball.

      A young talented athlete has many choices - do they go into track, basketball, baseball, football, soccer, hockey, volleyball, swimming, cycling or something else? It depends on many factors, many of them depending on where they grow up.

    9. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      You don't hear anyone complaining that a lot of basketball teams are mostly (or at least disproportionately African-American). Chances are its that way because they have the most talent and not cause the coach hates whites.

      I don't think the argument that black people are inherently better at basketball is any more reasonable than the argument that white (or japanese) people are inherently better programs. Both come down to socioeconomic influences. A large number of black kids grow up in housing projects where "parks" are basically basketball courts, which are cheap for the govt to provide, and all they need to buy is a ball, so it provides cheap entertainment for lower income kids. That also snowballs because kids are influence by the media, and nearly all successful black poeple on TV or in the press are athletes and entertainers.

      The video game discrepancy can be explained very similarly. Perhaps instead of giving the % population that is black, they should give the % of the population with the required level of education who is black. I'm sure that'd cut a huge chunk out the demographic gap.

      This article doesn't really present any new info, it just puts a new angle (video game development) on an old topic (socioeconomics and race).

    10. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also seem to recall reading somewhere that the average African have a slightly higher muscle density than the general population as a whole- which gives them an advantage in physical competition.

    11. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was being generous. It is about 20% in reality. I was applying the standards in a tiered format that was developed by liberals to make everyone feel good. Remember 2+2=5. It is not the right answer that gets you rewarded, but the effort that went into getting it. (If you do not understand, look into the concept of "New Math" developed in the California Soviet Socialist Republic) ;)

    12. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      The problem though, is that even with the socio-economic differences that cause people to go into different careers, some people still expect the numbers to be proportional. So, if you are looking for a government job, and a black person applies, they will get the job to fill the quota. Because X% of the population is black, therefore, X% of the employees must be black, regardless of what percentage of people who are black actually even apply. I'm not saying that this happens all the time, but it does happen.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    13. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "The question should be, are the developers putting out a quality product? In my honest opinion, game developers fail in this task 60% of the time."

      The problem is, what is a quality product and what kind of game makes money are two different things entirely. We can list all the great games that bombed on the PC financially. The massification of video games has sent quality towards the mean and most accessable: The average gaming retard.

      We see more FPS and racing games then pretty much all other genres, that should tell you a lot about the state of the indsutry.

    14. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does happen. I wasn't arguing that point, I was trying to point out that race isn't a deciding factor in whether you can be good at programming or basketball or pretty much anything else.

    15. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      The thing about "the average" is that there is still a lot of overlap, so that it only really applies to populations, not individuals in most circumstances. While this may translate into (for example) a higher proportion of black sprinters at the elite level, race can't be used to predict who will be the best players at a pickup basketball game. It'll be the people who are there every day, regardless of what colour they are.

    16. Re:Let's devolve everything down to race. by Aphrohippi · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm sick of everything coming down to race as well. Much of the problem with the low numbers of black developers (yes-black, I do not refer to myself as 'african american")is probably because many of us don't focus on the courses that would better position ourselves to get into development. Growing up, I was made fun of because I loved computers, math and architecture. I'm nearly 42 years old and that trend continues in much of black America. Sure, you'll find pockets here and there that would defy this trend, but being a geek is still not cool in much of the black community. If most of our children are focusing on being an entertainer or athlete, rather than something in a cs related field, than the parents and even the schools may be to blame for not presenting alternatives.

      I could care less that the percentage of black game developers lag the percentage of black gamers, as long as the ones who are interested in development are not kept out of the loop or steered to other career paths.

  4. It's difficult to learn programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    when you are preoccupied with marijuana, video games and have limited opportunities to affordable education.

    The amount of focus(1)and education (2) is why blacks (3) are not engaged in programming.

    1(diminished by drugs)
    2(which requires money and time)
    3(not African-American because most are native born Americans)

    Solution? Education of the elementary children on the importance of a higher education, a drug free life style and the constant involvement of FATHERS and FATHER FIGURES in the children's lives.

    (not trying to be flame bait)

  5. Is this really surprising? by pokerdad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

    1. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment. Also, poor people have less educational opportunities.

      This is not about color, this is about money.

      If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor. The games thing is just a symptom.

    2. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would venture a guess that most African Americans living below poverty level could pay a year's community college tuition for far less than the cost of a console, a few games, and accessories. They could cancel their cable TV too-- that would pay for textbooks and free up even more time for work or study.

      Oh wait. Video games and cable TV are fundamental human rights, and poor people should never sacrifice them to pay for education, healthcare, etc.

    3. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same reason as you don't see a lot of Japanese and Hindi Basketball or Football players.
      It is genetics, and also Black Ghetto Hoes are an easy lay. So, why learn to program computers, if you can be getting laid every day since middle-school?
      Code is for white trash like me, or the japs, the chinks or the hindus, because we cannot get laid so we have to find something to do with our hands, besides bruising our intimate parts...

    4. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor.

      That's easy the best rapper in the world told me the answer to why african-americans are poor (he was also the one who told me he's the best rapper in the world).

      It's really straight forward: black americans are poor because George Bush hates black people.
    5. Re:Is this really surprising? by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. You're blaming the employers but in reality it's these Marxist televangelists spitting about racial inequality and conspiracies. The effect is a depressed population who think that even if they had a degree the 'rich white man' will keep them down. Now even if that were the case, it wouldn't stop them from a start-up company but the constant negative reinforcement does. The government AND private groups will both pay for their entire education and despite popular belief A LOT of black people DO in fact have a college degree. The problem isn't social-economic it's social-expectation, they need to put away the leather coats and barrettes and just go for it.

    6. Re:Is this really surprising? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment. Also, poor people have less educational opportunities. This is not about color, this is about money.

      That certainly is a major factor, but I'm not convinced it is the only one. There is a lot of self-segregation in many industries. This is not to say that people are consciously being racist, just that race is also a social/cultural differentiator. I've worked places where one project team or division was almost entirely immigrants from Malaysia. Another place I worked had greater than 50% of the team graduated from the same University... one 600 miles away. Programming is one of those industries where people are often hired through personal networks and although I went to a university that had a large number of ethnic groups, it was not at all uncommon to see large groups that tended to associate only (or primarily) with people of the same race.

      In some of the best places I've worked the workforce was much less homogenous and I don't think that was a coincidence. Among some of the most brilliant people I've worked with I've seen a tendency to hire people based upon their intelligence, talent, and experience almost to the exclusion of any social factors. For the video game programming industry, however, a lot of the time it seems to be people who are less competent. Most of the really intelligent people I know quickly got out of the game segment as the wages were relatively low, benefits weak, hours long and stress high. It would not surprise me at all to find that such a market segment was more prone to hiring people based upon social aspects more than skills.

    7. Re:Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >> If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor.

      The real reason is rap music and BET. If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate.

      But the same thing is true of some white people with their "pro-drunk driving and wife beating music". Just look at the literacy rates of people who listen to Lee Greenwood and Toby Keith: It's next to zero.

      It's not a shock that people who listen to Toby Keith end up being jack-booted jingoists or people that listen to Jay-Z and Dr. Dre end up morally bankrupt.

      It's just simple programming:

      Garbage in Garbage out.

      Until you understand how this process works, you're not likely to be a game developer.

    8. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Isn't this the natural result of the socio-econic situation of said racial group in the US, the high cost of college in the US, and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

      Nonsense. I'm in Canada and the High School I went to was full of lower class people living in bad apartments and rooming houses. The people who moved on and did something with their lives were the ones who showed motivation and determination; nothing to do with skin colour.

      Man do I ever get tired of hearing these stories about how the poor blacks can't afford college because society is holding them down. I went to school with Blacks (African and West Indies alike), Whites, Asians, Indians (both from India and the Native Canadian variety), Sri Lankens, Pakistanis, Europeans and a whole host of every other "ini" and "ean" you can imagine. Some had their parents paying their way but most were there through part time work, savings, grants, scholarships, loans and student lines of credit. I don't care where you're from or what your background - if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain about how unfair life is.

      But hey, let's make sure to placate "visible minorities" by giving them specialized scholarships! Or, if you're not dark enough but you have the right set of genitalia you could always apply for a scholarship for women! When did scholarship money become about what a person looks like rather than their drive, ambition and abilities anyways??!

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    9. Re:Is this really surprising? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      I suspect that the most limiting factor is not so much "economic" in nature, but rather that there are strong cultural influences in many "African-American" communities which place very little value on the sort of things which are necessary to successfully pursue a college degree and subsequent employment in the video game industry.

      In short, Studying and computer-programming are generally not cool. Basketball, and sports, on the other hand, are.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    10. Re:Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

      Oh wait. Video games and cable TV are fundamental human rights, and poor people should never sacrifice them to pay for education, healthcare, etc.

      That's right. You should do the actual work to pay for their education and health care. We will collect this from you via a method we call taxation.

      Disclaimer: This message has been approved by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and John McCain

    11. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if I buy that. These days video games cost anywhere from $30 to $60 each, not to mention $200 to $400 or more for the console itself; I would not call that "very cheap". In fact, I would venture that video gaming is one of the more expensive forms of entertainment. I think it's just that these particular people have different priorities. Why do you think we see these same people paying thousands of dollars for rims while living in a shit hole and not providing enough of the right kinds of things for their families? I think it's an image or lifestyle issue more than anything else.

    12. Re:Is this really surprising? by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's what being poor means.

      Me, my dad was an engineer, and coincidentally(?) I did pretty much the same thing, went through college, and now make a middle-class living. It never really occurred to me to be a politician, or an entrepreneur, or a pro athlete. Even now I don't have a clue how one becomes those things. Could I become something different if I plunged in and figured it out? Probably (except pro athlete), but - and here's the point - I didn't. I traveled the road that was before me (which luckily put me at about the 90% percentile of earners in the US). What if I'd been born poor? How about you?

    13. Re:Is this really surprising? by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

      Largely, yes. But you have to bear in mind that, partly BECAUSE of that socio-economic situation, things may well suck for those 2% of would-be game designers who ARE black.

      The only real way to "fix" this is to (a) make sure that discrimination is illegal, which we've already done, and (b) somehow eliminate the statistical correlation between race and poverty/education, which is a lot harder and will take at least a generation (and probably a lot longer, given how much we as a society suck at addressing the issue.)

    14. Re:Is this really surprising? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >When did scholarship money become about what a person looks like rather than their drive, ambition and abilities anyways??!

      Sure, you are outraged by this, but yet you don't speak out on such things as alumni preference (at many schools it is officially part of the weighting that if your parents went to school there, you get a better chance). This has been directly shown to cause a sort of affirmative action for white people; but of course you wouldn't care about that; it isn't convenient for your argument.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    15. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain about how unfair life is.

      Or sit around and play video games, as it were.

    16. Re:Is this really surprising? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      African-Americans have more grants and scholarships available to them than whites of equal economic status.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    17. Re:Is this really surprising? by Otter · · Score: 1
      ...and the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

      For some reason, there's this prevalent myth that you become a game developer by being a particularly hardcore gamer. ("We just finished level 3 and need to tighten the graphics a little bit.")

      No one thinks that using spreadsheets qualifies you to write Excel, but people don't understand that you become qualified to code on Madden by taking lots of math, not by playing lots of Madden.

    18. Re:Is this really surprising? by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) This is about something in the US NOT Canada.

      2) There IS socio-economic relation between poverty and Blacks in the US.

      3) There IS basically ZERO students loans programs in the US.

      4) Stop applying your life experience to a country in which it does NOT apply.

      5) I am Canadian.

      But a question. Did these people that "moved on and did something with their lives" go on into the games industry? Because, that is what we're talking about after all.

    19. Re:Is this really surprising? by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

      My parents earn just enough that my family doesn't receive any government aid. My father went into public radio, my mother does clerical work. I have a part-time job.

      I'm currently on the road to study Computer Science or Mathematics, possibly both. I'm not traveling the road that was set before me, and while not poor, I'm not financially stable either.

      I may be the exception to the point you were making though.

      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    20. Re:Is this really surprising? by chunk08 · · Score: 1

      Why is parent modded troll? It is an honest and suprisingly well-thought-out opinion. Music does affect people. Many leaders (good or bad) and philosophers have recognized this.

      --
      Do away with our corrupt tax code. Support the Fair Tax
    21. Re:Is this really surprising? by maxume · · Score: 1

      ?

      A stick is a cheap form of entertainment(cause you can poke stuff with it, or see what happens when you hit that big guy with it, etc.). Or a book. Video games might be cheaper than a lot of stuff, but they aren't cheap.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    22. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's troll because it isn't politically correct. Factuality be damned.

    23. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, you are outraged by this, but yet you don't speak out on such things as alumni preference (at many schools it is officially part of the weighting that if your parents went to school there, you get a better chance). This has been directly shown to cause a sort of affirmative action for white people; but of course you wouldn't care about that; it isn't convenient for your argument.

      I didn't speak out on such things as book costs, transit routes or the mascots chosen by the institutions because it wasn't relevant to what I was discussing either. So for your strawman I present a book of matches.

      Now, to address what you've said; so? People in higher educational facilities prefer to have people in them who form some sort of heritage, or people who help fund the school and donate "wings" and libraries and the like. So?

      Do you think it's unfair that retail businesses also offer preferential treatment to their existing client base?

      A small hint for you; if you go looking for it, you can find various forms of discrimination everywhere you go. Keep looking; I'm sure you're only helping the cause.

      Rather than championing small changes, why not champion a total overhaul of your country's education system? Force the government to redirect a portion of their military budget toward education. How many people could the war in Iraq have sent through post-secondary over the same time frame? Would the country be better or worse for it? Forget any other factors; allow people to continue through the system based solely on academic proficiency.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    24. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A console shared amongst several kids/young adults, second-hand/shared games, multiplied by the number of hours of entertainment you can get out of them - it works out pretty cheap compared to other forms of entertainment.

      Not everybody buys an XBox for each sibling in a family, not everyone buys games new, not everyone gets a different game every week.

      You don't know many real poor people do you - you have no idea how they live. Count your blessings, rich white boy.

    25. Re:Is this really surprising? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > I don't care where you're from or what your background - if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain
      > about how unfair life is.

      If life isn't unfair you shouldn't complain about it? Or life isn't unfair for black people in the USA right now? What, centuries of racism just vanished in the last 40 years when lynching became embarrassing?

    26. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The portrayal of Africa, or the Caribbean, since we don't know where it's being set, as sort of this dark, dangerous continent filled with people who only want to do you harm goes back a long, long way."

      Geez, really? Africa is really a place I would love to take my family to for vacation. Maybe when we get there we can view bigotry, or a wartorn country, or go to one of the hundreds of refugee camps. Yes Africa is a lovely place.

    27. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If life isn't unfair you shouldn't complain about it?

      Complaining is intended to achieve what, exactly? Is it going to make people realize the err of their ways and usher black people into the gaming industry and anywhere else they feel slighted? Or is it intended to them give extra incentives to blacks and other minorities so that when they do enter the work force they're resented by their co-workers? "Oh, (s)he's an affirmative action hire."

      Or life isn't unfair for black people in the USA right now?

      Strawman. Life is unfair for everybody starting the moment you're born. Get over it. You have two choices; sit and moan or get up and do something to make your life more fulfilling, for whatever definition of fulfilment you may have.

      What, centuries of racism just vanished in the last 40 years when lynching became embarrassing?

      Oh boo hoo. There are still ignorant people out there. I'll ask again; does affirmative action help, or hurt the cause of minority acceptance in the work place?

      Have you ever heard an otherwise racially neutral person utter a phrase like "Yeah, it's easy to get a job if you're a ${racial_slur}!"?!? Is it more fair to swing the pendulum in the opposite direction and discriminate against the Anglo Saxon Caucasian Males because we've had it so good up 'till now?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    28. Re:Is this really surprising? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Video games are a cheap form of entertainment? On what planet? The minimum price for a console is $250. Minimum for a portable $100. Games average between $40-60 a pop. Extra controllers range from $20 for generic to $50 for name brand. So let's go with a basic, one system, one game and an extra controller. $250+50+30 = $330. I hardly call that cheap entertainment, when a paperback book is $8, and a library card is free.

      Incidentally, $330 is more than 6 hours of community college and text books around here.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    29. Re:Is this really surprising? by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      Many poor people that I see to not know how to, or don't want to make an attempt to, properly manage the money they do have. Why do I see families who don't have a phone or computer, and whose children run around in hand-me-downs, that have an XBox 360 and a 54" TV?

      Poor (American, not African/Haitian/etc) Blacks seem to be worse about this, though I've seen it in Whites as well. No, I don't think that there's some sort of "buy stupid crap instead of teaching and feeding your kids" gene that's prevalent in Blacks, but this is a problem that has a snowball effect.

      If the children could be reached, the next generation could be better. But if you give the family a computer, the kids won't get to touch it; the parents will pawn it or use it to watch porn. There's no point in giving the kids books because the parents won't read to them. I know, because this is what I tried!

    30. Re:Is this really surprising? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment. Also, poor people have less educational opportunities.

      Oh shit... we Latinos are less than poor =o(

      In Mexico, having a game console and buying games is quite expensive. Paying $5,500 MX for an xbox is not something every father can do. Therefore arcades are still a bit popular or shops where people can pay for 1 or 2 hour to play a console. If black people (are we [latins] brown?) in the USA consider playing consoles cheap then I am really jealous about you :).

      BTW, I have always found the "African American" name stupid, with that same line of reasoning, the whiteies that live in the USA now should be called "Irish Americans" or "German Americans". etc... and I would be called "Spanish Mexican". If you want to profile by skin color, then yeah, some of them are "black", the same way chinnese are "yellow" (at least that is the characterization we in Mexico give to them) and some of us (Mexicans) are brown (or "color caca"... no offense intended). But I think in the case of the African desentands living in the USA, it has been a loooong time since they became as integrated to society as the Irish desendants or the British desendants.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    31. Re:Is this really surprising? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Complaining is intended to achieve what, exactly?

      Getting people to acknowledge that the cards are stacked against black people in the USA (and elsewhere).

      > Is it going to make people realize the err of their ways and usher black people into
      > the gaming industry and anywhere else they feel slighted? Or is it intended to them give extra incentives to blacks and other minorities
      > so that when they do enter the work force they're resented by their co-workers? "Oh, (s)he's an affirmative action hire."

      Extra incentives for black people would include not being passed over for employment/promotion because of their colour. Even today, women earn less than men, regardless of their ability/background/experience. It's just that much worse for black people. Nothing to do with affirmative action (which I don't personally agree with).

      > Strawman. Life is unfair for everybody starting the moment you're born. Get over it.

      The human condition can be something negative, certainly; however, I don't agree that increased chances of arrest and longer sentences upon conviction are `the human condition` - I call that `institutionalised racism`. It's probably easier to say `get over it` when it doesn't affect you.

      > You have two choices; sit and moan or get up and do
      > something to make your life more fulfilling, for whatever definition of fulfilment you may have.

      You can do the best you can, and you can also try and highlight the unfairness of the system you exist under - it's not an either/or.

      > There are still ignorant people out there. I'll ask again; does affirmative action help, or hurt the cause of minority acceptance in the
      > work place?

      Overall it helps rather than hinders the quality of life for black people but not without cost for black and white people alike. As I've said, I don't agree with it, but it's not the most important facet of race problems, and you'd be unwise to focus too closely on it.

      > Have you ever heard an otherwise racially neutral person utter a phrase like "Yeah, it's easy to get a job if you're a
      > ${racial_slur}!"?!? Is it more fair to swing the pendulum in the opposite direction and discriminate against the Anglo Saxon Caucasian
      > Males because we've had it so good up 'till now?

      If you look at the life expectancy of black people in the USA, as well as prison population by race, average income by race etc, you can easily see that if the pendulum is moving towards a better quality of life for black people it's moving rather slowly and has yet to reach equality; the idea that it's actually in black people's favour right now is simply laughable.

    32. Re:Is this really surprising? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      Generally I would agree with you. However, anyone with any drug related conviction becomes ineligible for those student loans you were speaking about. I'm can't speak for all places, but I am aware certain counties in the state of Georgia have a law "loitering for drugs". This means one can be arrested and charged without possessing actual drugs, or even drug paraphernalia if the police determine they were in a "known drug area" - and unfortunately for many of the poor (minorities tend to make up large numbers of these, but not always) - this means you can be arrested for walking home. I know someone will say, "but such things are rare", and blah, blah, blah. How many inmates do you know? If the answer is few or none - then surely don't presume to know why and how they ended up in jails. Consider that 1 in 7 new army recruits require a waiver due to criminal records. Many people think this reflects on the caliber of people now volunteering for the Army - but it actually reflects on the nation. One in Seven young people need waivers period.

    33. Re:Is this really surprising? by Tpl2000 · · Score: 1

      well, let's see. $330 for a few hundred hours of entertainment. plus electricity costs, and let's just say that doubles the price, since i really have NO clue about electricity rates. well, shrooms, ecstasy and LSD cost a lot more, in comparison. and they could be called entertainment, no? Well, I think video games are a reasonable alternative, especially considering the routes some other people, regardless of race or origin, are taking.

      --
      Epic. Just epic.
    34. Re:Is this really surprising? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Point of order. There is plenty of money to go to college. You can't even graduate highschool before they start sending you letters about scholarships, loans, grants, easy money, not so easy money and credit cards.

      Everyone in this country can afford to go to college in some fashion or another. The problem is, not everyone should go to college, and that is something that needs to be corrected.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    35. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      Generally I would agree with you. However, anyone with any drug related conviction becomes ineligible for those student loans you were speaking about.

      My OSAP loan application had no mention of a criminal record check.

      I'm can't speak for all places, but I am aware certain counties in the state of Georgia have a law "loitering for drugs". This means one can be arrested and charged without possessing actual drugs, or even drug paraphernalia if the police determine they were in a "known drug area" - and unfortunately for many of the poor (minorities tend to make up large numbers of these, but not always) - this means you can be arrested for walking home.

      We have various laws in Ontario that are similar. Essentially they're designed to allow police officers the ability to stop and question people they feel may be involved in suspect behaviour. The way you then speak to those officers will often dictate how you're later treated. Is it right? No, but the best advice I ever received was "Yes sir, no sir, three bags full sir!" In other words - cooperate, give the officers whatever information they need (to a point, obviously) and get on with your life. When people are stopped by officers and resort to spitting on their boots and calling them pigs is it really surprising when those officers will find a way to charge them with something?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    36. Re:Is this really surprising? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Saying that video games are cheap entertainment compared to drugs is akin to saying that walking through downtown harlem with a sign that says "fuck black people" is smarter than walking through downtown harlem with a sign the says "fuck niggers". Either way it's a stupid choice.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    37. Re:Is this really surprising? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      3) There IS basically ZERO students loans programs in the US. Every American can easily get student loans to pay for any college. Most can get a large portion of those loans subsidized by the federal government.
      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    38. Re:Is this really surprising? by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      Well yes, while we're at it my father managed to enter the one of the most prestigious universities in S. Korea despite having less than 5 years of formal education. But the fact still remains that someone with spare cash would be able to spend more time monitoring their children's education (or at least pay someone to do it for them), and want their children to stay in their socio-economic niche through education.

      With enough motivation ANYTHING can be overcome, but that's irrelevant, most people aren't that self-motivated (even in the education obsessed nation of S. Korea btw). When personal drive fails, then you need parental help, and money becomes a crucial factor there.

    39. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't entirely disagree with you, but racial inequity is a complex issue which I do not believe can be entirely compensated for by hard work. First, I believe that most of the people that you speak of have voluntarily immigrated to seek opportunity in Canada, this is not a fair comparison with blacks in the US. This is not the same situation as a people who were enslaved and systematically discriminated against for hundreds of years. If you assume that all discrimination completely ended after striking down all the "Jim Crow" laws of the US. That means that black people in the US have only been on a level playing field in since the 1960s after generations of being denied economic and educational opportunities. I believe this has had a lasting impact on black people. It has ingrained a defeatist attitude and a distrust of white people, which discourages assimilation into "white" America. The scholarships you refer to are token gestures which do not fundamentally address the root causes, but as you said, placate minorities. A few examples of minority success does not necessarily indicate the progress of minorities as a whole. Also, if you read the Slashdot comments on racial issues it seems evident to me that racism still exists even within the arguably "smarter" Slashdot crowd. However, it also evident that black people cannot depend on charity and must persevere despite of the hurdles in their path. Frankly most white people really don't care about these racial issues until it impacts them. The demographics of the US are changing and in the not too distant future whites will be the minority. It will be interesting to see how attitudes may change, when no one cares about "white" issues.

    40. Re:Is this really surprising? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, are you fucking kidding? Now the problem is the *attitude* of the harassed citizen? You might have a slightly more bitter attitude towards authority if you were stopped on every corner and questioned about the crime of walking while black...

    41. Re:Is this really surprising? by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, are you fucking kidding? Now the problem is the *attitude* of the harassed citizen? You might have a slightly more bitter attitude towards authority if you were stopped on every corner and questioned about the crime of walking while black...

      You don't think I've been stopped and harassed by the police just because I'm white?!? When I was younger I was stopped all the time because of where I was hanging out, what I was wearing, who I was with, where I was going, etc.

      Are you actually saying that any given police officer will charge a polite black person merely for walking? Me thinks you've watched too many movies.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    42. Re:Is this really surprising? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >A small hint for you; if you go looking for it, you can find various forms of discrimination everywhere you go. Keep looking; I'm sure you're only helping the cause.

      As a Canadian, I don't think you could even begin to know. I invite you to come down to South Carolina and see it for yourself. We do things like redistrict black people so that their votes don't even count.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    43. Re:Is this really surprising? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      You are actually making my point. You were stopped and harassed by police while not doing anything illegal, and you are white. I'd bet anything it wasn't your lightly colored skin and politeness which kept you from being detained and charged. Cops are keenly aware who can afford lawyers, and who cannot. Class discrimination is by far the bigger problem. Oh, and I'm speaking from my personal experience with cops, judges, P.O.'s, inmates, probationers, etc, etc, etc. I'm not much for movies and TV...

    44. Re:Is this really surprising? by Tpl2000 · · Score: 1

      well...actually, it is slightly(slightly) smarter, but they are both stupid choices. and...an ecstasy pill costs some $50 each, no? one pill a week is more expensive than video game. anyways...

      --
      Epic. Just epic.
    45. Re: Is this really surprising? by PAKnightPA · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I would disagree. I think you imply that listening to music about "rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling)" makes one desire to drop out of school, join a gang, etc. This is not true. For example, A very large portion of my music library is this kind of music. I personally like it a lot. I would go so far as to call some of Dr. Dre's work classic. Yet I attend an elite university, and certainly wouldn't ever think of committing violent felonies.

      What you are saying is the same thing Jack Thompson says about violent video games. Rap music doesn't turn you into a gangbanger any more than playing Counter Strike trains you to be a violent killer. Frankly, I am surprised you were modded up by the same people who would probably mod you way down if you were agreeing with Mr Thompson. Oh well...

    46. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Why are you mad about a woman getting a scholarship? Is it your money? There are scholarships with all kinds of requirements ranging from the right last name, place of birth, time of birth,...e.t.c. Do you have a problem with them too? Or is it just the race and gender based scholarships?

      Are you familiar with institutional racism? Do you have to continually pay "hidden" taxes, like legal fees to fight stupid cases from racists cops who pull you over for DWB? What if you couldn't afford the lawyers? I could go on and on.
      Bigots have been singing your "effort and laziness" tune all the while conveniently overlooking the systematic favors and advantages they get over others.

      I suggest you read,"Privilege, Power, and Difference" by Allan G. Johnson http://www.agjohnson.us/

    47. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the parent is being sarcastic, I can see modding them +5 funny, but +5 insightful?

      He completely ignores the fact that racial economic disparities existed before rap music. In fact, not so long ago "black" music was jazz, but most blacks were still poor.

      Further, he's making the same stupid argument that gets made against violent video games.

      If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate. That applies just as well to GTA, doesn't it? Looks like we'll have to ban any hint of violence from our culture. Garbage in garbage out, right?
    48. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your comments are nonsense. If a group advocating the banning of violent video games because they promote violence in youths, you'd say that was silly.

      There are some impressionable people who think what people do on Rapcity is normal. But that goes with any show with a large following (Rock music anyone?)

    49. Re: Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I wouldn't agree with Jack Thomson, but your analogy is not very good. Music and video games are fundamentally different in the ways that they effect the nervous system. While playing video games can be addictive due dopamine being released during the process[1], they do not have nearly the same subconscious effect that music does. Furthermore, it is much easier to distinguish between fantasy and the real world during a video game since the images are all artificial. When listening to music, you get to fill in your own script to the soundtrack with whatever is going on at the time (i.e. it is much more real).

      This is a field of research that has gained a lot of attention in recent years, and a lot of good books have been done on the subject.

      This is an up-and-comer:

      http://www.amazon.com/Sweet-Anticipation-Psychology-Expectation-Bradford/dp/0262582783/ref=pd_sim_b_title_4

      There have been several studies done verifying that listening to complex, harmonious music (i.e. beethoven, bach, mozart, iron maiden, gnr etc.) sparks intelligence and creativity, while listening to someone talk over a one beat drum machine (e.g. Nelly, NAS) lowers intelligence and dulls creativity. Playing a musical instrument is even better for you. Just do a quick search:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=music+makes+you+smart

      As a matter of fact, Beethoven's 5th and 6th symphonies (opus 67 and 68 respectively) were written back to back and demonstrate the process of intelligence increase in musical form, with the crisis starting at the knocking of fate at the opening of opus 67 and traversing through the ex-stasis experience and ending in harmony in the pastoral symphony. The fact that listening to Beethoven dramatically increases intelligence has been proven time and again (http://www.amazon.com/Breakthrough-Thinking-Principles-Creative-Problem/dp/0761506489).

      People are creatures of habit and their personalities are shaped by the things that they do. You will become your rituals(see: wilson's 23rd law). Of course, your personal experience will be different from everyone else, but chances are that if you are listening to this on a constant basis it's going to have a deep, life-long effect on your personality.

    50. Re:Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

      Well, I wouldn't ban rap music or video games since I believe in free speech, but playing GTA when you could be writing code or reading a book is likely to make you stupid also. Of course, there are lots of video games that actually require thought...

    51. Re: Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does if you live the lifestyle. Maybe you don't. Some do. GTA won't turn you into a criminal, but if you play it while the console's off, guess what? The difference between rap and GTA is that, unlike in video games, there is a portion of people who listen to rap who live the thug/gansta/whatever lifestyle.

    52. Re:Is this really surprising? by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      Unless my sarcasm detector's broken, I'm having a hard time understanding how blaming music for inner city violence, illiteracy, and wife beating is +5 insightful worthy.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    53. Re:Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does (1) your socio-economic situation affect the music you listen to, or does (2) the music you listen to affect your socio-economic situation, or is it (3) more complicated than that?

      You seem to be saying (2), but I'd argue (3) with an emphasis on (1).

      I know from personal experience that one can listen to gangsta rap and be a doctor or lawyer. Hell, you don't even have to be black. That's only one data point, but there you go. My daughter watches Dora but that doesn't mean she's going to be an explorer.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    54. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's troll because it isn't politically correct. Factuality be damned. There is more than mild political incorrectness in that post.

      If you're filling your head with fantasies about rape, robbery, murder, and obscene materialism (bling bling) on a 24x7 basis, it's no wonder that you turn out violent and illiterate." Since he's talking about the wealth of black people as a whole, the implication here is that black people as a whole are likely to be violent and illiterate. Not sure if that's what he meant, but it comes across as a gratuitous insult. Which would be trolling.
    55. Re: Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playing a musical instrument is even better for you. Just do a quick search:

      http://www.google.com/search?q=music+makes+you+smart [google.com] I did. That search returns just as much information contradicting your point as supporting it. This one says:

      Here's where the Mozart madness began. In 1993, the journal Nature published an article by scientists at the University of California-Irvine. In their experiment, students listened to a Mozart sonata, a relaxation tape, or nothing at all for ten minutes, and then took a spatial reasoning test. ...

      And even after a 1999 review showed that 12 subsequent studies had failed to verify the famous 1993 one, people still believed in the magic of Mozart.
      ...

      That's right. There's a catch. In a University of Toronto at Mississauga study, music has been shown to increase IQ points in six-year-olds who took weekly singing or piano lessons. If your kids learn to sing or play an instrument, they just might become smarter.

      So, yeah, PLAYING an instrument may increase your intelligence - but most of the links in your search trying to link listening to intelligence are (surprise!) selling classical music products.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    56. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh and if you believe gangster rap causes a lot of real-life violence, I hope you believe many video games also cause real-life violence. After all, both claims are based on the same "logic".

    57. Re:Is this really surprising? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I think the reason there is so much resentment about these special scholarships is that the people who support them are also preaching from the other side of their mouths that discriminating based on race, gender, or religion is a big no-no.

      Your example of alumni preference is one that is not explicitly about race, and that's why it's generally ignored. Since you imply that it's ignored because it's to the advantage of white people, let me give a counter example: scholarships for low income people. Since poor people are disproportionately black, these are also "sort of" affirmative action. The key is the "sort of" part. People like to know that at least theoretically, the scholarship is available to blacks, whites, Asians, Latinos, women, men, smart people, dumb people, Lutherans, Muslims, Sikhs, etc. It's equal opportunity in terms of the big three categories -- race, gender, religion. Same with alumni preference. That counts for more than you seem to think.

    58. Re:Is this really surprising? by stdarg · · Score: 1

      There are no student loan programs in the US just like there's no healthcare in Canada.

    59. Re:Is this really surprising? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      I know from personal experience that one can listen to gangsta rap and be a doctor or lawyer. Hell, you don't even have to be black. That's only one data point, but there you go. The correct thing you said is that *this is one data point*.
    60. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you that, for the most part, it isn't true, but there is that sub culture of people it does apply to. I know some very smart people who like that type of music, but the fact still stands that some people live the lifestyle, and I think that's what the GP was talking about. Of course, I don't think the music is directly connected, but it certainly doesn't help.
       
      As for your video game example, lets just say a group of people decided to live GTA. Obviously, the game itself probably wasn't a major factor, but odds are it didn't help things.

    61. Re:Is this really surprising? by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      My OSAP loan application had no mention of a criminal record check.

      The US system uses a multitude of loan and grant programs including Stafford Loans, Pell Grants, Plus Loans, and state and university loans. All of them require a student fill out the FAFSA which explicitly does ask about drug use, and all students who have drug convictions are automatically ineligible for federal aid including grants.

      Thus someone who smoked a joint at 16 and got caught will have a much harder time getting funding to get through school even if they have exceptionally good academic credentials. They could still apply for some private grants or simply work harder and take much longer to get through. OTOH, their upper-middle-class peers whose families had the money to hire lawyers and beat the drug convictions can still sail right through.

    62. Re:Is this really surprising? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      Well, since you ask, when I was about, oh, two, and living in Philadelphia, I was helping my mother with baking in our apartment (to supplement our income). As such, my first word was apparently "hot" (like the oven). We couldn't even afford subway tokens (let alone a car). Now, admittedly, we were never quite at the point of poverty where we needed to have Crisco sandwiches (like I understand some of my mother's friends did as children), but I still think this was a reasonable level of "poverty".

      It's not half so much the lack of money that does anyone's future in per se. It's the environment where you grow up, upbringing, who you have for role models. Which is correlated with money, sure (highly motivated, ambitious people tend to end up with money, and as parents usually drive their children fairly effectively) but it's not the same thing. Of particular note, from a public policy perspective, it indicates that throwing money at the problem (even in some of the best possible ways) is no panacea. If you want poor, underprivileged children to learn, you need to to do more than simply provide opportunities - you need get someone in there to motivate them to do it. There's no one simple way to get this to happen, though.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    63. Re: Is this really surprising? by PAKnightPA · · Score: 1
      In you first paragraph you claim that video games have less of an effect because you see fake images, but in the case of rap music you have to use your imagination and thus your imagined images are somehow more real than the one's the playstation (or whatever) generates. Really?

      Also you claim "Music and video games are fundamentally different in the ways that they effect the nervous system." This is a very strong claim. Please at least come up with some sort of backing for your points. The only stuff you come up with MightyYar seems to to have shot down pretty hard.

      I still think my analogy is pretty apt.

    64. Re: Is this really surprising? by floodo1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      your friends turn you into gangbangers. DUH.

      but maybe you don't like to hear that, so maybe its about how the streets feel dangerous, and television makes the streets feel dangerous. probably about how television, movies, and games make it "seem cool to be in a gang." It might have something to do with very little adult guidance. It might have to do with being poor, living in the ghetto, and having nothing and nothing to do. it might be that a gang provides you with the family you never had. it might be that you can't make decisions correctly and need help.

      all of these reasons support "Garbage in Garbage Out" but also show that music is far from the only or most important factor. The parent's parent fails to realize that people might be attracted to the music precisely because they are illiterate or already have fantasies of rape, murder, or general mayhem. It's quite possible that the music represents and outlet, not an input

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    65. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how parent was modded insightful, considering this is the same type of crap that Jack Thompson spews about video games.

    66. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, shrooms, ecstasy and LSD cost a lot more, in comparison. and they could be called entertainment, no? Well, I think video games are a reasonable alternative Alternative? Don't you mean supplement?
    67. Re: Is this really surprising? by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      I call BS. How could you prove anything but a strong correlation between Beethoven and intelligence? What is the actual mechanism that makes you smart due to auditory input?

      I find it much more likely that people listen to classical music because they are smart not that classical music makes them smart. And that's from someone who isn't very smart but appreciates classical music.

    68. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the voting history of blacks in SC (overwhelmingly voting in favor of black candidates), white politicians would be suicidal to NOT try to redistrict away black votes.

    69. Re:Is this really surprising? by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      Motley Crue didn't make a generation of white kids who were unable to program, and Dr. Dre didn't make a generation of black kids who were illiterate. Sometimes music is just music.

    70. Re:Is this really surprising? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every state redistricts people that way. It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with which party people in a given neighborhood vote for.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    71. Re:Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Technically my entire post is correct :)

      I'm not aware of any research implicating gangsta rap as the cause of what ails poor black neighborhoods. And the whole notion is a bit absurd anyway, since the poor black neighborhoods existed long before gangsta rap.

      Even if there is an effect, it would likely pale compared to the effects of racist policies like redlining. In any discussion of how to help people in impoverished areas, criticizing their choice of music is at best unhelpful and at worst scapegoating.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    72. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you want something you work for it. If you don't, sit around and complain about how unfair life is."

      and then you started complaining about how unfair life is... If you believed what you said you wouldn't be bothered by any scholarships for people who don't happen to be like you and instead you would be working for it and not complaining.

      The best system is obviously one that is biased towards the person judging that system. For a white person in the U.S. the best system is one with no 'overt' mechanisms towards racial bias because there are basic, underlying mechanisms that favor them (look into the ideas of 'white privilege' and 'black tax'. All the things you decried as unfair are actually mechanisms attempting to create a level playing field.

      BTW, one mechanism of "working for it" is highlighting and correcting a system that prevents you from obtaining success.

      Disclosure: I am a male, half-caucasian, half-asian software engineer.

    73. Re: Is this really surprising? by Sethus · · Score: 1
      "There have been several studies done verifying that listening to complex, harmonious music (i.e. beethoven, bach, mozart, iron maiden, gnr etc.) sparks intelligence and creativity, while listening to someone talk over a one beat drum machine (e.g. Nelly, NAS) lowers intelligence and dulls creativity. Playing a musical instrument is even better for you."

      Good lord, I don't listen to that much hip hop and I find that offensive. Have you ever actually tried to listen to rap or hiphop and enjoyed it? Your opinion terrifies me with it's close mindedness. I had a roomate that listens to hip hop all the time, blasting it loud as he can, going down the street in his ride. He just graduated with a masters in Public Relations with honors. I find about half of the hip hop music out there to be inspiring, have amazingly clever beats and lyrics, and insightful to a culture I'll never be able to truely understand. I don't think rap or hip hop are the causes of lower intelligence (if this is the case), rather a symptom of a different caste in our contemporary society.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    74. Re:Is this really surprising? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      There IS basically ZERO students loans programs in the US.

      I'm calling MAJOR BULLSHIT on that one. There are generous loan programs available at every university and college in the U.S., even to the middle and upper class. You can even get outright grants if you're poor enough.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    75. Re:Is this really surprising? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'm in South Carolina, and much of said redistricting comes from black politicians wanting to keep their jobs in majority black districts too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    76. Re:Is this really surprising? by Speck'sBacon · · Score: 1

      Could it be he was modded troll for insulting the intelligence of black people, and hip-hop and country music fans all in the same post?

    77. Re:Is this really surprising? by bryanp · · Score: 1

      It's not a shock that people who listen to Toby Keith end up being jack-booted jingoists or people that listen to Jay-Z and Dr. Dre end up morally bankrupt.

      Gee, stereotype much?

      Some of us listen to and appreciate (now hold on to your preconceptions tightly) more than one genre of music. While rap generally isn't to my taste, there is a bit of country that I do enjoy in addition to rock, classical, jazz, older Motown and such. If you think choice of music is indicative of intelligence then you are a sad individual indeed.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    78. Re:Is this really surprising? by Eil · · Score: 1

      Exactly. More african-americans are poor, and video games are a very cheap form of entertainment.

      Say what now? A current video game system is between $150-$300 brand-new. Each game ranges from $40-$60 and it's not cool any more to have just 4 or 5 games--upwards of one to two dozen seems to be the norm. Would you explain to me please how that's "very cheap" to a minimum wage single-parent family?

      If you want to talk about race, talk about why more african-americans are poor. The games thing is just a symptom.

      I think it has less to do with why many African-Americans are poor than it does with America's insatiable hunger for entertainment. It seems like the less money a family makes, the higher their percentage of their monthly income goes towards entertainment.

      My wife and I used to be friends with a couple that is, shall we say, less than well-to-do. (And no, they're not African-Americans.) They moved into a house that was essentially given to them by a family member and what do you think was their first priority? Unpacking boxes? Getting the furniture arranged? Stocking the pantry? Nope. They pissed and moaned for _three whole days_ because it was taking _forever_ to get the cable TV hooked up.

    79. Re:Is this really surprising? by Speck'sBacon · · Score: 1

      Are you really this ignorant? I'm willing to bet you live in the U.S. on either the East or West Coast, since you're turning your nose up at what liberal elitists like to call "flyover country." This country (USA) wouldn't work without the people whose literacy and intelligence you just questioned, based solely on the music they enjoy. Other elitists traits you're exhibiting are: 1.) Thinking the average person is too stupid to think for themselves without your caring condescension (and presumably government assistance). 2.) Thinking patriotism is "jingoistic". I'm guessing you presume to think of yourself as a citizen of the world. Patriotism does not automatically mean you've checked your brains at the door, or can't see the value of certain things other countries have that we don't.

    80. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're conveniently ignoring social pressures and community-level cultures which create and perpetuate an environment where motivation and determination are cut off at the knees by hopelessness. Do a few rise above? Absolutely. You use them as an excuse for ignoring the fact that many more could have if their environment was improved. You are advocating abandoning these communities else you accuse the world of giving handouts. You are advocating the American meritocracy's equivalent of putting the unwanted on an ice float.

    81. Re:Is this really surprising? by xhrit · · Score: 1

      >The real reason is rap music and BET.

      Funny you mention BET in connection to a story about how African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites. Black Entertainment Television and Microsoft had a joint venture called MSBET; one would wonder if microsoft used its position to market the xbox to urban youth.

      One must wonder is all ov this is a page from Alexandro Jordorowsky's Technopriests: Gaming has become a tool to imprison its inhabitants in a complacent trance of mediocrity.

    82. Re:Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

      Well then I would be insulting myself since I am black.

    83. Re: Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say this is credible research or do you give it credit because it fits your world view? Is it a real study or racism calling itself research?

      Do you think it might be the modern equivalent of late 1800 'research' to prove that Africans are an inferior species because they have smaller brains? As I recall a particular researcher tried to prove this, but ended up fudging his data when he found no significant correlation. (Despite the issue that relative brain bucket size doesn't seem to have much influence on intelligence anyway)

      Did you know that many of the composers you listed were considered musical heretics of their time, and didn't gain popularity until long after their work because their music was considered degenerate?

    84. Re:Is this really surprising? by Starrk · · Score: 1
      What I said:

      Not sure if that's what he meant, but it comes across as a gratuitous insult. I just think you phrased your point badly, and that's why you got modded troll. Shrug. I wasn't the one who modded you.
    85. Re: Is this really surprising? by neuromancer23 · · Score: 1

      In you first paragraph you claim that video games have less of an effect because you see fake images, but in the case of rap music you have to use your imagination and thus your imagined images are somehow more real than the one's the playstation (or whatever) generates. Really?

      Yes. Biologically and Psychologically as far as the brain is concerned, there is no difference between experiencing an event and imagining it. You can watch the activity on an fMRI and see the same areas of the brain light up, and see the same bio-chemical reaction. On the contrary, imagined experiences are often more real than physical experiences especially during periods of deep trance, such as those that occur while been deeply engaged in a task or listening to music. I am sure your professor can validate this for you as soon as you get around to taking PSYCH101 at whatever "elite university" you are attending.

      Also you claim "Music and video games are fundamentally different in the ways that they effect the nervous system." This is a very strong claim. Please at least come up with some sort of backing for your points. The only stuff you come up with MightyYar seems to to have shot down pretty hard.

      See the previous post for recommended reading material on how music affects intelligence (i.e. neo-cortical function) or just do a search on amazon

      I still think my analogy is pretty apt.

      No it isn't. A better analogy would have been reading a book.

    86. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you actually saying that any given police officer will charge a polite black person merely for walking? Me thinks you've watched too many movies.

      I remember being a designated white guy for a group of black friends.

      3 black kids walking around at night = Police stop and take notice every time.

      3 black kids + nerdy white kid = No problem.
    87. Re:Is this really surprising? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      I do not think gangsta rap is *the* cause. I think the cause is a culture of irresponsibility, crime, and laziness. You can argue that this culture is not their fault since they are the product of their environment. The point is, gangsta rap is a result of this culture, and I believe there is a positive feedback: if you keep hearing music that portrays criminals as "macho" and policemen as enemies, "pigs", and corrupt, there is a chance your image of policemen may be degraded. You may also end up thinking that disobeying policemen (and the law), and, in general, being violent, is a sign of manliness.

      My view on the cause of poverty is probably influenced by family experience. My grandfather was illiterate, and, tough he had a big farm, he lived a very simple life, in a house without electricity, piped water, or any kind of bathroom. My father gained his first boot at age 12. Until then, he worked barefoot alongside my grandfather. Yet my father is now a researcher with a P.H.D. He achieved this with a lot of effort and study. He studied in very harsh conditions. Yet I hear people saying "Mr. Orlando is rich because he has poor people working for him".
      I also have some poor friends, and I see they spend their time watching TV, playing videogame, or otherwise wasting their time. When they become adults, they get bad jobs.

      If this is true here, I can only imagine how it is in the USA. Your GDP per capita is some 4.6 times the world average. People that travel to the U.S. tell that any healthy adult (except illegal immigrants) can easily get a job that pays $7 or $8 per hour.

      But some Americans complain that they cannot find a job. Of course they could work at McDonalds and earn $7 per hour, but then their friends would laugh at them saying that they job is "Do you want fries with that?", and $7 per hour is also "too little". They deserve more.

      "Poor Americans" need some perspective.

    88. Re:Is this really surprising? by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      People from many different walks of life listen to rap music. Are you trying to imply that successful people only listen music that is morally inspiring? Are you trying to suggest that game devs only listen to music that is wholesome and pure? Since we are on the subject of game devs what kind of music do you think they listen to? I wouldn't be surprised if half of them knew the lyrics to "nothin but a g thang". Blacks in America were in the same situation before rap music and BET. Are you going to blame Marvin Gaye for that? I'm not a game dev but my company has plenty and they tend to be more into this type of material than anyone else in the company. Whenever I go into one of their offices I feel like I'm in a teenagers bedroom, not that its a bad thing.

    89. Re:Is this really surprising? by dwye · · Score: 1

      > Why is parent modded troll?

      > > Just look at the literacy rates of people who
      > > listen to Lee Greenwood and Toby Keith: It's next to zero.

      I know many people who listen to Country Music, even if I don't particularly like much of it. None over 8 years old are unable to read well (I haven't checked the youngsters.

      Next stupid question.

    90. Re:Is this really surprising? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I think the cause is a culture of irresponsibility, crime, and laziness. But this neglects the fact that black Americans are catching up with whites. If their culture was to blame, then surely their economic growth would not be exceeding that of whites?

      "Poor Americans" need some perspective. Indeed, and I agree with you to a large extent. You have to understand, though, that a $7/hr job in the US will never let you afford a house. The cost of living is higher here. A gallon (just under 4 liters) of milk is $5 in New York City. If you have kids, you just spent an hour working for their milk. 100 of your hours just went towards your rent bill. You have to work a few dozen more for your utilities. Now you've just used up your 120 hours without buying anything to eat, so you get another job to pay for some groceries. And now you need someone to look after the kids.

      So yes, poor Americans are not starving. But neither are they all fat and lazy. You can work just as hard as your father and never do anything more in life than manage to keep your unattended kids alive.
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    91. Re:Is this really surprising? by INowRegretThesePosts · · Score: 1

      But this neglects the fact that black Americans are catching up with whites. If their culture was to blame, then surely their economic growth would not be exceeding that of whites? I'm sorry, my writing was unclear

      1) I did not mean that only black people are lazy and stupid; the whole society is. Most people admire Hollywood stars more than hard-working scientists. We geeks are often mistreated.

      2) Until a few decades ago, black people were heavily mistreated. This explains their poverty.

      That being said, I believe that, in many places, racism has nearly ended. At least in Brasil, I cannot imagine a person being refused a job just because of skin color. Black people are treated well, and naturally create friendships and relationships with white people. Many musics talk about the beauty of the "mulata" (a mixed black/white woman).

      With the end of racism, the wealth division between blacks and whites is changing, but it will take some years to reach a natural wealth distribution.

      My belief is:
      1) Most people are lazy and stupid.
      2) Those born rich tend to continue rich
      3) Those born poor can develop themselves economically if they show effort. The amount of effort varies:
      - probably very hard, sometimes impossible, in a miserable country like Haiti
      - not hard in a developing country like Brasil (except in the poorest regions, like some parts of the Northeast)
      - easy in the USA

      Of course, this varies a lot depending on a particular person's experience, including the person's health, how poor the person is, etc.

      I should add that many countries, including Brasil, have developed a lot recently. Some decades ago it was a lot harder to get out of poverty here.

      You have to understand, though, that a $7/hr job in the US will never let you afford a house. The cost of living is higher here. I have a hard time believing that. Maybe people have too high a standard for housing.

      The USA is filthy rich. Check the World Factbook. Your GDP per capita (corrected by PPP, so the cost of living is already included) is not only 4.6 times the world average, but also 40% higher than that of the EU, 34% higher than that of Germany and 36% higher than that of Japan.
      The USA also has a very high standard of living, with a HDI of 0.951 (the world's highest being 0.968).
      Also, the income distribution is reasonable: from the World Factbook, the household income or consumption of the 10% poorest is 2% of the total (and remember, the total is huge).

      I once heard a guy say "the imperialist pigs are a failure! While they have a big GDP, 12% of their people are below poverty line!". Anti-Americanism aside, the guy forgot one thing: the U.S. set the bar very high.
    92. Re:Is this really surprising? by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      All of you point out BS on the funding issue yet 1) LARGE amounts people don't go to college because of funding issues and 2) don't point to any student loans programs.

      Also, there wasn't even ONE comment on my other points. It's a kind of attempt at discrediting someone based on a corner case that's seen more and more today. It's nonsense and is indicative of an undereducated populace.

    93. Re:Is this really surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Oh boo hoo. There are still ignorant people out >there. I'll ask again; does affirmative action >help, or hurt the cause of minority acceptance >in the work place?

      Minority acceptance isn't the issue. Actually getting INTO the workplace is the issue. (Assuming you're a white male) You have been given an unfair advantage. Do you have to adopt a "white voice" to excel at a job interview? See a lot of purse clutching? Were your parents and parents' parents (and so on) subject to formal, legislated racism that, oh, I dunno, maybe financially hamstrung their communities and ensured an uphill battle for decades? Try looking a little deeper at the issue.

      >Is it more fair to swing the pendulum in the >opposite direction and discriminate against the >Anglo Saxon Caucasian Males because we've had it >so good up 'till now?

      Yes.

  6. Dadeblunts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article was bullshit. The whole resident evil 5 thing. What color do you think the people are in haiti, do you think they are asian?

  7. meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so what? i bet 98% of the executives at KFC are white too.

    1. Re:meaningless statistics by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      so what? i bet 98% of the executives at KFC are white too. And I'll bet they like chicken, too.
    2. Re:meaningless statistics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'll bet they like chicken, too. Bullshit. Only people who are too poor to afford beef like chicken.
  8. In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I gotta say, it's VERY rare I see any black people at programming related events. But.. it's also pretty rare to see women. A connection? Perhaps.

    More than any other group I've come into contact with, programmers typically seem to be socially-stunted and have personality and mental issues (particularly depression, narcissism, and semi-autistic disorders). Thankfully, these issues tend to translate well into becoming great programmers.

    In comparison, most black people and women I've come across, tend to be more outgoing and sociable. If I had the social skills most women and black folks seem to have, I probably wouldn't be a programmer either, because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people.

    So perhaps we shouldn't lament why there aren't more women, blacks, whatever, in the software industry, but feel some relief that they're not mentally damaged enough to find the industry that interesting in the first place.

    1. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You are stereotyping : 1. programmers, 2. African-Americans 3. Women.

      You seem like you have good intentions. Why don't you hush and read the comments posted by others.

    2. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..or you could stop demonizing introverts. Just because someone doesn't give a shit about what happened with the giants last night, doesn't use/fall for the use of clothing to present false images, and refuses to sugarcoat the truth for the sake of feelings, doesn't mean they don't deserve respect.

    3. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue, as a earlier poster pointed out, is probably more socio-economic. What do you need to practice programming? An expensive computer and expensive software... something that black children are far less likely to have available, due to the disproportionate number of blacks who live in poverty in the US. The same goes for Sports... why don't more blacks play golf? A sport that requires hundreds of dollars in equipment, fees for courses and other expenditures. Basketball? A Ball, some sneakers and a net... which can be found in any park in the nation.
       
      The biggest problem I have with the gaming industry and the treatment of blacks, is the same issue I have with games and women; Stereotypes. I have posted several times and ranted about the misogyny of the game industry and how they portray women... but blacks are affected the same way (Young men also have poor role models in games, but I can rant another time). Pick up any game, 9/10 any black characters are gangsters, or jive talking sidekicks. Daikatana - Superfly Johnson, Gears of War - "Cole Train", GTA, 50 Cent games... very few games have respectable, black characters.
       
      More and more I see videogames being stereotypes of popular media, big breasted women in skimpy cloths, Muscle bound badass dudes who will beat the shit out of you (because that's what a MAN does), and black characters who are jive talkin' badass gangstas. Would more black or women programmers or game developers change that? Who knows... but more male programmers hasn't changed the "tough guise" stereotype of male characters.

    4. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had the social skills most women and black folks seem to have, I probably wouldn't be a programmer either, because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people. I have to say you're doing programming for the wrong reasons if it's only because you're not sociable enough to do "lot more interesting things". What is that anyway? Meaningless chit chat with people? Because that's what 95% of the interaction with people is.

      I don't mind interaction with people, I even enjoy it on occasion. Human kind is a sociable animal. But what would make it "more interesting" than for example solving problems with programming or any other science oriented field, I have no idea. Maybe I'm just emotionally damaged nerd, but your comment seems out of touch with the reality I'm experiencing.
    5. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by piojo · · Score: 1

      Stereotypes are not completely invalid. They are "heuristic approximations." So, though it's often not reasonable to make assumptions about an individual because they are part of a group, it's perfectly reasonable to make assumptions about the group as a whole.

      This is not to say that all stereotypes are useful or valid for describing groups, but I see no reason to object to Peter's post.

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    6. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be in a very small demographic considering I am BOTH African American and a woman ... AND a programmer.

    7. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not. Stereotyping is saying "all X are Y" or "X tend to Y" where no common pattern exists.

      Quoting your own experiences is not stereotyping. Let's say EVERY black person I met was a good cook, and I said that. That doesn't mean I'm "stereotyping" black people.. merely relaying my experiences.

      Sorry for the pedantic response, but that's my own minor bit of autism coming through ;-)

    8. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I must be in a very small demographic considering I am BOTH African American and a woman ... AND a programmer.
      Based on my experience in the industry, yes, you are. Since most of us here are white male nerds (self included), what is your experience?
    9. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by akintayo · · Score: 1

      "and refuses to sugarcoat the truth for the sake of feelings, doesn't mean they don't deserve respect."
      I think this is a contradiction, you are indicating that people who are inconsiderate of others deserve respect. I am confused, as this implies we should sugarcoat the truth to salve their feelings. Do you agree ?

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    10. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > people who are inconsiderate of others

      How are introverts inconsiderate of others? If anything the inverse is true, it's the extroverts with the overbearing personalities and introverts don't tell them to fuck off exactly because we're considerate (and because we know it's usually a mask).

      Refusing to conform to shallow social pretenses and not caring for others are completely disjunct.

    11. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by ruin20 · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse! Clearly blacks like to work with women! What a connection you discovered! And clearly most of the white people I meet are introverts. I mean most people in general! What are the odds of meeting actual being outgoing and sociable. That has nothing to do with the odds of actually meeting them! And yes I will rejoice in the fact that few women and blacks (clearly no overlap there) have the capacity to work in a field that can put food on the table and feed families. I find your perceptions a bit warped.

      --
      Oh honey look... How cute... an angry slashdotter!
    12. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you are, even whites can be the minority.

      I'm taking computer science at UBC, and in my Computers and Society class (the only CS class I took last term) roughly 50/67 were non-white. The vast majority of the non-whites were Chinese or otherwise Asian, and a small percentage were Middle Eastern. There were only two blacks.

      I live in a city with a very large Asian population, but whites are still (barely) in the majority. Thus, Asians are clearly overrepresented in my class (and in the computer science faculty as a whole). The number of blacks, however, is roughly what I would expect -- they make up less than 1% of the population here.

      Now, if I was going to use the standard logic favoured by many IT industry types, I would be forced to conclude that whites are being actively discriminated against. Realistically, however, the reasons are likely much less sinister. My guess is that some cultures emphasize math and computer science more than others -- Chinese parents are apparently delighted when their kids go into the tech industry, white parents like it too (but clearly much less), and there seems to be some resistance to the idea among blacks.

    13. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 1

      Very good point my friend! As a woman, (a Jewish, lesbian woman at that) - I'd like to point out you don't see the effects of discrimination unless it's targeting you.

    14. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Not caring about the feelings of others, makes you inconsiderate.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    15. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Programming - C++ , C#, PHP, web client side, and others. College degree in Computer Information System & Web development..

    16. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      Stereotypes are not completely invalid. ... but I see no reason to object to Peter's post. The reason is that his stereotypes are invalid.
    17. Re:In other news, only 2% of rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God... that's all we need. Let's enforce ethnic quotas in hip-hop so that we give a chance to every wimpy whitey in the burbs to pose as a gansta LOL ...

      This whole discussion regarding ethnic quotas is dumb. I've seen many "Latinos" who are blond and have blue eyes (e.g., Emilio Estevez from The Breakfast Club). And yet, they are Latinos and can take advantage of any laws protecting minorities. I don't think Affirmative Action works. It only creates division and resentment within the society.

  9. Wow by Fusen · · Score: 1

    So what about all the non American black people, or the non African blacks? If you are going to say "only x% of developers are black" then why not just use 'black' in the headline instead of the PC "African American"

    1. Re:Wow by oceaniv · · Score: 1

      Uh because this SPECIFICALLY refers to black people in America specifically those from the background of slavery --> I.E. AFRICAN AMERICAN versus black indians, or black africans... etc etc African american isn't PC unlss you use it to describe people who aren't of the understood ancestry, which is something yuppies don't seem to understand.

    2. Re:Wow by Thugthrasher · · Score: 1

      What about those whose parents were, for example, Haitian? Try calling a Haitian-American "African American" and see how quickly you get slapped. Black seems to offend much less people if you're in an area where people often come from the islands. (note: I live in Florida)

    3. Re:Wow by oceaniv · · Score: 1

      but Haiti is a country of its own, the ancestors may have been slaves, but it is it's independent country... they're not "American"... they're Haitian, it's their nationality, now if haiti had a huge white population (which it doesn't) it'd probably be like South Africa which is Black/Zulu south African white English/Dutch South African Indian South African... like people from Sierra Leon, there is a large population of them that went from slavery here to colonies there. They wouldn't be called Haitian, or American, or African-American or god-knows what... they'll be Sierra-Leonean (or whatever) At the end of the day it's people's preferences though. Brown, black, blue, white, purple, grey, beige, striped, straight, gay, pansexual, etc. etc. whatever floats your boat.

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty typical. And I notice that it only happens with blacks in America. You never hear about European Americans, or African Australians, for example.

      If I ever have a conversation with someone who insists on being called African American instead of black, I'm going to insist they refer to me by my ethnic ancestry and current home the same way.

    5. Re:Wow by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      How about German Americans, Italian Americans, or Irish Americans? We're just a little bit more discrete for those of European ancestry. Although, now that I think about it, we generally just say Germans, Italians, or Irish, we just drop the American part.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    6. Re:Wow by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      Except that it SPECIFICALLY refers to black people in the US, Canada and Australia, regardless of whether they have a background of slavery. Not only not all american, but not all african either. African American is PC all the time, and is plain incorrect sometimes, which is something people who don't RTFA don't seem to understand.

    7. Re:Wow by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that Haitian programmers don't count for the sake of this article? Do they not count as black programmers, or not as programmers at all, or what?

  10. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was the parent modded as Flamebait? If anything, mod it as Offtopic. The definition of nigger is "a lazy person".. it has nothing to do with race.

  11. Here we go. by UseCase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As I read some of the post here "N#$%^ are stupid" etc.... I can't help but to think that the real reason is that the development industry in general is skeptical of a person of color's capability to design and develop software. I currently work as a senior software engineer on a few key development project in the telecom industry and to tell you the truth it has been a battle to get where I am. No matter what I want to believe about merit and talent, there is an underlying "how did you get in, here?!" sentiment floating around the development industry when it comes to blacks doing design and engineering work. It is a real shame that we as an industry can't just be above all of this a hire people based on there capability. Sad world......

    1. Re:Here we go. by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think technology has the most opportunity for women and blacks. I have developed on many projects where people had never seen a picture of me. The only reason people know you're black or a woman is if because you go and post it. Also, technology is most prevalent in areas with the least racism (and the fewest blacks), like the west coast. So really, stop playing the race card. Every socially inept programmer wants to be judged based on talent and nothing else.

    2. Re:Here we go. by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      No matter what I want to believe about merit and talent, there is an underlying "how did you get in, here?!" sentiment floating around the development industry when it comes to blacks doing design and engineering work. Yeah, unfortunately I've seen that, too, in a couple of technical fields now. Sometimes I think people showing that sentiment may not even be consciously aware of it, which makes it hard to do much about it (and it certainly wouldn't make me feel better if I were receiving the negative consequences of someone's unconscious bias).

      It is a real shame that we as an industry can't just be above all of this a hire people based on there capability. Based on what I see on Slashdot and The Daily WTF (I certainly choose high quality, un-skewed data sources, don't I?), it seems that some people making the hiring decisions can't identify skilled technical people even when they're of the same ethnic background as themselves. I can only imagine that lack of ability to identify skill gets amplified when the interviewee is of an ethnic background that the interviewer might have a bias against.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    3. Re:Here we go. by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      World? I hope that your version of "world" ends at the US boarder. Because, when I worked in IT in Canada it didn't matter one bit who you were. In fact, the shop I worked for had two women programmers and a guy programmer that was legally blind. There was also about an even split between French and English people and a couple had an appearance like they had some Aboriginal blood in them. I'll also note that in interviews for later jobs, this diversity didn't seem unique.

    4. Re:Here we go. by Swift+Kick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason you find skepticism in any industry for the capabilities of a colored person is because of the bang-up job the so-called 'civil rights leaders' have done yelling and screaming about how minorities cannot achieve anything without assistance.
      It is exactly what affirmative action has turned into; rather than give those a real opportunity to those who work hard for it, it became just another way to 'milk the system', so instead of having those most capable, you end up favoring those who are the loudest (regardless of color).

      You may refer to this as the 'soft bigotry of lowered expectations'. You might think that it's yet another racist thing, but can it be really racist when those directly responsible for it are your from your own race?

      As long as you have 'reverse discrimination' (which is what affirmative action effectively is), you cannot and should not complain that you're not evaluated on your own merits. Don't blame the industry; blame the Jesse Jacksons and Al Sharptons.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
    5. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad because the double standards we've established with affirmative action laws have actually turned around and created the exact same discrimination for a different reason.

      50 years ago a black wouldn't get hired because he was black and the world was full of bigots.

      Now blacks get looked at funny because everyone knows of the affirmative action laws and has to wonder if a black is actually qualified for the job or got in because human resources decided they needed to meet their 'black people' quota.

      Thats the real tragedy about the whole thing.

    6. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why I'm posting, but I certainly notice racism/sexism in my feelings towards some people. Not that I justify it, just notice it there as something coloring my perception. Maybe I freely admit it because I don't feel like it makes me a bad person, unless I give into the perception and treat it as fact.

    7. Re:Here we go. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      The reason you find skepticism in any industry for the capabilities of a colored person is because of the bang-up job the so-called 'civil rights leaders' have done yelling and screaming about how minorities cannot achieve anything without assistance.

      Shit, as opposed to an Uncolored Person? WTf, all those word games to try to refer to the specific popluation desendants from African immigrations are so lame.

      I am sure there are plenty of Gonzalez and Lopez game develoers and yet you do not see that kind of characterization about desendants of hispanic immigrants (they even get the USA Treasurer position!).

      You "Irish Americans" really should get over your African desendants fixation!.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    8. Re:Here we go. by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      My $.02 worth. Both of my parents have master's degrees, one brother has a bachelors, one sister has a master's, one brother is 4.0 in college and my other sister is still in high school. I have five kids, work full time, and have been going to college for the sum total of 8 years. I don't have a degree, barely have a 2.0. My wife dropped out in the 11th grade, and now has a 3.5 in nursing school. We have over 70,000 in student loans, not including huge amounts of grants every year. We've recieved wic, food stamps, free daycare. What color are we?

    9. Re:Here we go. by pxc · · Score: 1

      It might be like that in the industry, but it definitely doesn't seem that way at school. While at my school only 2 out of the 30 kids in programming are black, I think those two are probably the best and sharpest programmers. Because of this, nobody wonders why they're there: these kids are in programming because they're good at it.

      I think the problem may arise when you have a black student who is also a poor programmer, and then people start making generalizations.

    10. Re:Here we go. by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      It's sad because the double standards we've established with affirmative action laws have actually turned around and created the exact same discrimination for a different reason. Maybe it's the same reason, with a different excuse? When you're in a shop where you wonder how that one black person got that good job, it's likely that if you interact at all with him, he realizes that you consider him inferior (he's not psychic-- as a black person, he has met lots of white people who consider him inferior, and just notices the pattern). And this is what he thinks of you: if you don't consider him (the only black person there) qualified, based on his race, you probably think there is no black person in the country qualified for the job. So you must be some exceptionally gifted white guy in a field of extremely exceptionally gifted people. As since, as we all know, you aren't, the black guy just thinks you're a common racist. Moreover, the black guy is disappointed that all the average and below-average white workers get a pass (they earned their jobs) yet you only complain about him. Apparently, when an "unqualified" white guy is hired, it's an accident; but when an "unqualified" black person is hired, it's because of race, and it is morally abhorrent.
    11. Re:Here we go. by westlake · · Score: 1
      No matter what I want to believe about merit and talent, there is an underlying "how did you get in, here?!" sentiment floating around the development industry when it comes to blacks doing design and engineering work. It is a real shame that we as an industry can't just be above all of this a hire people based on there capability. Sad world......

      My sister had much the same experience in entering the tight little world of landscape architecture.

    12. Re:Here we go. by benhattman · · Score: 1

      I'm real confused here. The rest of us just get automatic passes to be senior engineers, but minorities need to work for it? If so, I need to go mention to my boss that I'm white.

      Every year, Bill Gates announces there aren't enough (cheap) programmers graduating from our colleges. I graduated from a major program only 5 years ago, and it was literally filled with minorities. I would estimate less than half the program was Caucasian.

      But guess what, essentially none of those people were black. We had tons of Asians, we had people from South America, Latinos, etc. But only like 1% of the program was black.

      Essentially everyone who graduated got a job in the field. So whatever the skew is, I doubt it's a hiring problem when it can be explained so much more accurately by looking at graduation rates.

    13. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but can it be really racist when those directly responsible for it are your from your own race? Yes, it can. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't stop it, though.
    14. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Affirmative Action is a necessary evil for society's ills that should expire in 2064, but the game industry have nothing to do with that.

      The Japanese stereotyping blacks,latins, and whites is no different than what we have been doing in our media for years, so we can't really say anything.

      Let's concentrate on making better games in the States.

    15. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad because the double standards we've established with affirmative action laws have actually turned around and created the exact same discrimination for a different reason.

      Maybe it's the same reason, with a different excuse?
      The "reason" the parent refers to in that quote is the reason for affirmative action (which is not anti-minority racism), not the reason why we question whether a black person was hired based on merit.

      When you're in a shop where you wonder how that one black person got that good job, it's likely that if you interact at all with him, he realizes that you consider him inferior (he's not psychic-- as a black person, he has met lots of white people who consider him inferior, and just notices the pattern).
      Well, I would not use the term "inferior." The point I think the parent was making is that we all occasionally run into a lazy or incompetent employee. When the incompetent is white, we don't usually think much about how they got their job, except to sometimes speculate that the lazy beauty slept her way to her current position, or if the bumbling kid is the regional manager's nephew. When the incompetent is a black, however and the employer practices affirmative action, we may wonder some of those same things, but added to that is the possibility that they got their position thanks to the discriminatory hiring practice that is affirmative action.

      And this is what he thinks of you: if you don't consider him (the only black person there) qualified, based on his race, you probably think there is no black person in the country qualified for the job.

      Right, so what if I only think this person is lazy or incompetent? If they are able to interpret something in my manner as disapproval or disdain towards them, according to you, they may attribute to a perceived pattern of racism. See, this is part of the problem. If you think you're a victim of unrelenting racism, you can blame racism for problems that lie squarely at your own feet. Maybe you even go so far as to demand entitlements to compensate for these disadvantages.

    16. Re:Here we go. by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      What playing the race card is going on? He is a programmer, presumably employed and capable. Nobody is using race as any kind of excuse for anything in this case, just pointing out that racial profiling exists in the industry and is a part of his career, not a crutch.

    17. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure your parents must be real proud of you. If you're any color at all, it's the "black" sheep of the family. If I had to guess you're white and Catholic. I'd like to introduce you to a new procedure out there called the vasectomy. You should try it sometime.

    18. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really sad thing is your race itself. So much has been done to boost up you creatures, we have fake black inventions, black 'beauty queens', blacks are overrepresented in media and mostly portrayed positively (or conflicted). The reality is in return negros have given nothing but crime, diseases, black-on-white rapes, murders, filth etc. You certainly are an exception. You should feel sad for your own race. Visit Stormfront and read a few hundred threads there. It is all very eyeopening.

    19. Re:Here we go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I did my MBA, a Caucasian woman looked at me and proudly stated that white, non-handicapped, females earn over 50% of all affirmative-action/equal-opportunity based money, grants, business deals, etc.

      Yet at the next immigration rally, Joe Sixpack will yell at me, the dark-skinned, LEGALLY ADMITTED, woman from a little southeast of the Florida Keys, and tell me that I am stealing his tax money.

      I pay 30% tax to SS, Medicare, and who the hell knows what else, and yet I cannot take any SS, Medicare, or affirmative action benefits.

      Next time you want to scream about affirmative action, look at your mother/wife/girlfriend/sister/daughter.

    20. Re:Here we go. by Lexi_the_linux_girl · · Score: 1

      I am Canadian too, and I think some Americans forget that he US is not the world. In what i considered the most red neck part of Canada (Calgary, Alberta), I went to school with, and have worked with many people of many different nationalities and descents, and both men and women. Diversity is not an issue in IT, although racism in Canada does still exist (and is targeted towards Natives more than any other group).

    21. Re:Here we go. by Lxcom · · Score: 1

      What race card are you talking about? Do you mean this card that I'm about to use to trump you for your stupid move.

      Here it is:

      You are an idiot! You suggest non-White people hide and work, as you say, "where people had never seen a picture of me."

      Who are you? People shouldn't have to hide, don't want to hide, and will not hide, in order to be accepted.

      Unless there is some preconceived bias to the contrary, every unidentified person in the USA is assumed to be White. It is the American way...because White is supposed to be synonymous with "America"...even though the fabric of America has been woven by the hands of people of many races, colors, and nationalities.

      Therefore, by hiding behind anonymity, one adopts the default label of, or pretends to be, "White."
      Who wants to be accepted as White, unless they are?

      Who are you instructing to hide?

      Imagine a White child going to kindergarten and reading in their textbooks, day-after-day, year-after-year that they came from slaves and that most Black people, the ruling class, the ones who are in the positions of hiring employees and giving job contracts, don't want people who look like them, including their mommies and daddies, in their neighborhoods, don't want them to have the same rights, and just don't like them. Imagine the effect on that child's outlook on life in this country in which they live.

      We don't need to imagine.

    22. Re:Here we go. by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

      I got news for you: I'm also a legal resident but not a citizen.

      Like you, I pay "30% tax to SS, Medicare, and who the hell knows what else, and yet I cannot take any SS, Medicare, or affirmative action benefits."

      Guess what, the opportunities I have here are far better than anything I could have done in my home country. Maybe you should consider going back "a little southeast of the Florida Keys" if it's such a burden to you.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  12. According to my local mayor... by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    ... Video games caused gangs, drugs, and gang violence in the Brockton, MA area and throughout Boston in Massachusetts. So the mayor of Boston, Thomas Menino, wanted to outright "ban" video games in many parts of Suffolk County, including Brockton and Boston.

    HELLO? Rap music, for instance, would be a much better medium to censor and show your racism.

  13. Is dis fo' real? by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong I think this is interesting, but I just don't see it. I live in an area where if I'm not a white minority then we are at a 50/50 split. But when I talk to A. American's I never hear them mention BioShock, Battlefield, Oblivion, C&C, WOW or Rock Band. I find it especially interesting that games like Saints Row which seem to almost be targeted at "their culture" are never brought up. If anything I hear some mention of Madden, but my own observations fall drastically short of the ratio that this article describes. I would love to see where these statistics come from. Now the point of this article is still lost on me. Are we saying that even though this demographic is hooked we still have untapped market potential? Or are we saying that the stigma of being a computer programmer hasn't really crossed that racial divide? Even further are they hinting at some unforeseen racism in the industry? I know people get uncomfortable talking about race and the only thing more certain to get you punched today is talking about religion but I don't care about that these statements have drawn my interest. I wonder would they have posted this if the US didn't have a black candidate for office?

  14. here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Racism, just like sexism, is so deeply ingrained in most people they're totally blind to it, and even worse, are just like the first commenters to this article- self-centered clueless twits who would rather die than listen to a different point of view, especially from someone pointing out a problem or trying to correct a wrong. (I have to wonder why y'all take it so personally, and always twitch like a gaffed fish when these subjects come up? Guilty conscience?) Nobody is asking for racial quotas, though there is always at least one guaranteed slashtwit to bring it up. Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining over the audacity of anyone who has been mistreated to actually stand up for him or herself, and try to make some changes.

    --

    we will end no whine before its time

    1. Re:here we go again by Saedrael · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. What the hell is wrong with a community that instantly rejects any suggestion of racism- mostly, I suspect, without actually reading the evidence presented? Have an open mind; maybe the people interviewed have something interesting to say.

    2. Re:here we go again by Robber+Baron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Racism, just like sexism, is so deeply ingrained in most people they're totally blind to it ...or maybe the reason we're most of us are "blind" to it is that it isn't doesn't actually exist, except in your quixotic, narrow-minded, liberal-socialist alternate reality!
      I bet you also think that white heterosexual men are solely to blame for everything that's wrong in the world too...
      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    3. Re:here we go again by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      100% correct. If anything the story is a bit absurd. If you look at the statistics for high school graduation rates, and college attendance, it shouldn't be any surprise that blacks are underrepresented in the video game development niche. As a country the United States still has a long way to go to create a level playing field, that many of the posters ignorantly believe we have.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit I wish we were allowed an edit or two!

    5. Re:here we go again by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with a community that instantly rejects any suggestion of racism NOTHING. Nothing is wrong with them, because a) we're all tired of hearing it, b) the situation is changing, gradually, but it is changing, c) the problem is often somewhere else, like equal quality of education, d) many of us "young adults" live in multi-cultural and multi-ethnic societies, and in the tech industry work with people of many races, and it is the older generation who insist on repeatedly highlighting what they see as racism, thus further fueling the segmentation of groups of people based on race and creating barriers.

      Look, there may be a low percentage of black people doing game development today. What do you want us to do, start hiring random black people? No, clearly what we should do is ensure that african americans get the same standard of education as anyone else who is ultimately motivated to choose game development as a career. Over time the issue will resolve itself naturally, without breeding resentment between races.

      Heck, we are very close to having a black president. If I wasn't a migrant worker I would absolutely vote for him over both of the white candidates, and I'm as white as they come. I'd vote for him because of his values, promises, genuineness, willingness to address difficult issues, and so forth, and not because he's black and black presidents are statistically under represented. And if I was in the gaming industry I'd hire developers because of their skills, not because they are underrepresented in my industry.

      I read TFA with an open mind, and it is clearly the same old rhetoric. If MTV wanted to do something valuable to contribute to a more balanced situation then they could have ran a show on game development featuring notable african american individuals in the industry (e.g. some of the people they interviewed) without focusing on racial issues, and this way young black adults could see that "Hey, these people are making a good life in an industry I'm interested in, and the prospect of me achieving the same doesn't seem so absurd". Obviously they decided to go with a series of interviews where a lot of the questions were "tell me your minority sob story from this angle?".
    6. Re:here we go again by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      It's probably because a lot of us computer geeks aren't racist combined with the fact that a lot of us are introverted and have a hard time understanding people having irrational thoughts different from the obvious reality. I ignore nonsense such as whether one race is superior just the same as I ignore nonsense such as which god is superior. They seem like quite pointless subjects to me, even if the majority of the world cares so much about them. I can see how this looks like being close-minded.

      That's my gut response, at least. More analytically, statistics like these have so many variables that there doesn't seem to be a way to pick out one, or even a set, of causes. So the motivation more seems to be rabble-rousing amongst the folks that like to argue or express righteous indignation about race rather than actually accomplishing anything.

    7. Re:here we go again by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Why do you think a lot of "computer geeks" are not racist ?

      I have found that they generally have a high opinion of self, that is not based in reality. I don't see any evidence that would suggest, "computer geeks" are less bigoted than the general population. And given that slashdot, one of the more popular website with "computer geeks" is full of bigoted opinions, I think that you are wrong. But I would love to hear your contradictory evidence.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    8. Re:here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone is getting the charred remains of her bra all up in a knot...

      Libtards like yourself do realize that so-called minorities are not the only ones to experience mistreatment based on race/gender/religion/etc... don't you?

      In fact, at most institutions of "higher learning," white christian males are the most likely to be insulted, demeaned and mistreated by the legions of self-proclaimed literati such as yourself.

      The next time you think about accusing someone who holds a different opinion of narrow-mindedness , you would do well to take a long hard look in the mirror. You are obviously just as narrow-minded as those you are accusing.

    9. Re:here we go again by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most of us would settle for you fine members of the "there is no problem, just quit whining" club to shut up and keep out of our way, instead of filling the heavens with your complaining

      Have you listened to yourself lately? We need a -1:Hypocrisy modifier.

      You could make the same point with less words....
      A: Shut up!
      B: How dare you tell me to shut up. You shut up!
      A: No you shut up!
      B: No you!!!
      A and B: SHUT UP!!!!

      How about we let EVERYONE have their say. Depending on the intent, the point of view that this is a waste of time may be just as valid as the point of view that something ought to be done about it. Quit telling people to shut up and state your case effectively to convince the maximum number of people that there is actually an issue. Sure would beat childish rants, even if they are modded up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    10. Re:here we go again by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      Read this article's comments at -1. Do you notice something? Yes. A shitton of people using the word "nigger" and making racist remarks.

      No, racism is not the only problem in society, and it's probably not even the biggest currently existing cause of low rates of African-American programmers, but it is around and it is real. It's not just something people make up. Go on Xbox Live sometime, then say that there's no racism. Read this thread. Look at the world around you.

    11. Re:here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think a lot of "computer geeks" are not racist ? I would have to say its because us computer geeks typically don't see the person we are interacting with.

      You post a comment to a forum, you idle on IRC, you have your IM client of choice going, and your MMO's

      And the people you interact with are typically fanciful nicknames with funny little cartoon pics representing 'them'.

      We don't see a race because we don't see the person. No skin colour, no age, no sex, not even a bad haircut to prejudge someone on.

      All you get are their ideas, the text on the screen in front of you, you cant even pin down what continent somebody is on with certainty.

      So we are already used to looking at a persons actions and deeds for indications on how to judge them, in a world where you can literally invent your image if you so choose there is no room for thought that something as banal as appearance could possibly have any relevance what so ever.

      I have found that they generally have a high opinion of self, that is not based in reality. So called computer geeks have a high opinion of self because the world shows us its justified, WARS are fought over ethnic differences, and everywhere people decry the evils of racism what we see is that we're the only ones who can actually ignore the issue completely.

      I don't see any evidence that would suggest, "computer geeks" are less bigoted than the general population. And given that slashdot, one of the more popular website with "computer geeks" is full of bigoted opinions, I think that you are wrong. But I would love to hear your contradictory evidence. I think I've just given you the evidence of why we'd be less bigoted than the general population.

      As far as /. being full of bigoted opinions (thats sure to make you popular btw) I think you are looking at it the wrong way on two counts.

      First those of us who spend most of our time in front of a monitor are usually better able to express our selves, text is a limiting medium and we must compensate for a lack of body language and tone of voice.

      Second this is the internet, there are less barriers to freedom of expression here than in a face to face conversation.

      In a personal conversation, I can be subjected to intimating looks, interruptions, shouting matches, personal humilation and public recognition to name but a few.

      But behind the screen of an AC, I can't be interrupted, you have no idea who I am, I can't be shouted down. I'll never have to fear an awkward moment in like behind somebody in the supermarket who i had a bad argument with.

      The medium is designed to draw out more and divergent opinions.
    12. Re:here we go again by akintayo · · Score: 1

      The internet allows for persons to voice there opinions without the moderating influence of society. I would suggest visiting a few of the larger sites on the internet, I am not sure the lack of moderation is positive. I also think the ability to disagree without being disagreeable, and to recognize the futility of an argument, are two skills that most people should learn, the scenario that you describe would not allow for this.

      Most "computer geeks" attend schools with homogeneous demographics, they then proceed to universities and jobs with the similar problem. They are rarely in situations where they interact with the "other", and (sometimes) when offered the chance, e.g. Slashdot postings, their comments would indicate that they are bigoted. If your assumptions were correct, the Internet would have fewer of these "extreme" opinions.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    13. Re:here we go again by EllynGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ""What the hell is wrong with a community that instantly rejects any suggestion of racism?"

      NOTHING. Nothing is wrong with them, because a) we're all tired of hearing it, b) the situation is changing, gradually, but it is changing, c) the problem is often somewhere else, like equal quality of education, d) many of us "young adults" live in multi-cultural and multi-ethnic societies, and in the tech industry work with people of many races, and it is the older generation who insist on repeatedly highlighting what they see as racism, thus further fueling the segmentation of groups of people based on race and creating barriers.""

      Wow, so much wrong, so little time...I'm soooo sorry you're tired of hearing about it. You know why you're hearing about it? Because it is still a problem. The people affected by racism don't have the luxury of going "oh, I'm so sick of this! So I won't pay attention to it any more!" I love your claim that bringing attention to a problem exacerbates it. Good logical geek thinking there!

      Yes, it is very slowly changing. Very very slowly. Change comes because people work for it and don't shush because the tender sensibilities of people like you can't handle it. Why did you even read the article, since it's not a subject you want to hear about? Or waste your time commenting? It makes you uncomfortable. But you'd rather blame people than ignore it or say "yeah, it's a problem." Nobody expects YOU to try to change things for the better- the least you can do is shut your ignorant mouth and keep out of the way.

      You did not RTFA nor do you have an open mind, because if you had you would have seen there was no rhetoric of any kind. Just thoughtful expressions of personal experiences. And here you are, and a hundred other idiotic slashdotters, claiming those personal experiences are all wrong, and you are right. That's some world-class arrogance, don't you think? Why is it so hard for you accept that people are treated poorly for extremely stupid reasons like skin color? Why does it bother you so much that you tie yourself in knots denying it? It is not a solved problem.

      --

      we will end no whine before its time

    14. Re:here we go again by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      That's some world-class arrogance, don't you think? Yes. Thanks for the compliment.
    15. Re:here we go again by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1
      Well said, AC. I'll add an excerpt from the Jargon file's Portrait of J. Random Hacker. :)

      Also, the ties many hackers have to AI research and SF literature may have helped them to develop an idea of personhood that is inclusive rather than exclusive -- after all, if one's imagination readily grants full human rights to future AI programs, robots, dolphins, and extraterrestrial aliens, mere color and gender can't seem very important any more.
      http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/demographics.html
  15. stupid by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And? If we truly want to live in a society of racial equality, we need to stop calling attention to stuff like this. Who gives a shit what whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, etc do. As long as we're not fucking each other over, who gives a shit..

    1. Re:stupid by Shados · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, TECHNICALLY, all the racial issues will go away once we ARE fucking each other over... as in, literally so :)

    2. Re:stupid by Arccot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And? If we truly want to live in a society of racial equality, we need to stop calling attention to stuff like this. Ignoring possible inequality does not lead to equality. Pointing out places where racism may be occurring allows us to look and see if that's the case, or if there is another underlying reason for the result. From there, we, as a society, can decide what to do, if anything, about it.
  16. Uh... by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    I don't know, but it sounds quite sensationalistic. I have never cared who the person behind a game is, because this is gaming, not a celebrity contest or a model show. If my favorite game is made by man or a woman of whatever race, it's not what's important. What is important are the reasons that made me like the game.
    It's like saying that the movie industry needs more midgets...it just makes no sense.
    Putting it differently, what matters of a game director/coder is the soul, brain and heart. Having those qualities, the rest is not relevant at all.

    1. Re:Uh... by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 1

      The movie industry DOES need more midgets, midgets are funny...

    2. Re:Uh... by oceaniv · · Score: 1

      for you the consumer it doesn't matter how the product comes to be, however, from a social perspective, from a power and wealth perspective, and to understand how a society functions and who is suffering from workplace inequality etc. etc. it is important to get information like this. yeah... this is not the whole picture, but it's a starting point... the next question should be why the discrepancy? is it something inherent about the specific culture or population that's causing this inequality (, or a social construction (i.e. racism).

  17. White Americans and the Hip Hop industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    White Americans spend more money and time playing and purchasing Rap music than African Americans, yet only 2% of Rap artists are white.

    1. Re:White Americans and the Hip Hop industry by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

      yet only 2% of Rap artists are white. And the black community thanks us. :)
      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  18. Does this discrepancy even matter? by afish40 · · Score: 1

    I wasn't aware that black people are only supposed to play games made by other black people.

    --
    Thanks a million. Push Start to replay.
  19. Makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Niggers are too dumb to create video games but are quite good at stealing and being lazy. Therefore, it is only natural that there would be an abundance of niggers playing stolen video games all day (when they're not busy beating their children to death with the controllers).

  20. Stop with this racial coddling by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other. It makes me angry even to see such headlines because yes racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. Why are we not discussing how there are too few Indian characters in modern-day computer games, or Phillipino's, or any other race? Because blacks are a racial crux that we like to fall back on and discuss whenever matters of race and equality come into play.

    I personally work with people of all races from all over the world, and though I can't say I have absolutely no prejudices whatsoever I certainly do not consciously discriminate against anyone because of their ethnicity. And I think a very large percentage of the current/next generation are the same - we're growing up in multi-cultural environments with mixed ethnicity and we're learning to value our differences rather than look on them negatively. It is the older generation who still wants to talk about the past, who still wants to talk about stereotyping and martyrdom. TFA does nothing to break from the conventional mold, and it's infuriating to me.

    In college [Computer Science] courses, I was typically one of maybe four black students, and I was certainly the only black female. In the industry, the makeup is pretty much the same. It's intimidating at times. I'm one of a handful, but I don't let these things hold me back. It's intimidating at times? Is it really? Were you singled out at college, or because you were too aware psychologically of your ethnicity did you single yourself out and limit your interactions between the other black students? Today, do your coworkers look at you funny when you walk down the hallway? Does the conversation stop at the water cooler when you arrive? Do you have to use a specially designated bathroom? No. Why is it intimidating? It's intimidating because you are all too aware of your race and concern yourself with the possibility of prejudice, not because it necessarily exists.

    On counting the number of black women at GDC: "The grand total was six, including myself, and I hear that [the Game Developers Conference] had an attendance of over 18,000 this year." And how many white women were there? I hazard a guess at not too many, based on the industries history of mainly male developers. Yes, women are still under-represented in certain industries, too. But if they work as hard as men and are equally qualified over time the situation finds a more natural balance.

    I think a lot of folks are just now starting to see it as a career choice. Young people are starting to realize that game development is something you can make a real living at. It's not like running off to join the circus. There are curriculums that are centered specifically around it, and the industry is looking for talent above all else. A-ha! Some intelligence. There may not be a lot of african american developers because we're only now promoting it to those teens as a viable career choice!

    I could go on. If we want to end racial bias and under representation, I support the free market model: Provide people equal opportunities not by artificially advantaging one group above another or by continually highlighting racial under-representation, but through a good education across all people, and simply let things work themselves out over time. The problem will obviously not go away tomorrow, but does that really mean we have to keep highlighting it today, over and over, repeating the same old talking points?
    1. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: Indian and Filipino are ethnic terms, both groups of people belong in the Asian racial category.

      And yes, this does make a difference, because race is a socially constructed designator used to categorize people in large yet distinct groups. Just like how someone of Brazilian descent and one from Dominican descent are both categorized in the Hispanic race designation.

      Getting back to the point, by reading your post I gather you are a white male who hasn't run into the same situations the interviewees in the article have been in, or at least haven't seen those situations from their viewpoint. The problem today is that there is a notion that everything is equal and there is racial harmony, and that racism is defined as quite clear-cut black-and-white overt hateful speech and attitudes.

      Although, yes, most of the country has progressed from extreme, overt racial attitudes, racism does still exist in an institutional sense, whereas many minorities - blacks in particular - are disadvantaged from day one because most are born into poverty-stricken areas with no access to quality education because past circumstances had placed the generations before them into a position where they could not accumulate wealth and assets that would be passed on to them, be it through inheritance of property or money, or ability to live in an area with well-funded schools to give them a quality pre-collegiate education to be able to get into top-notch schools (of which, most importantly, provide connections that make it easier to land a great job).

      So, getting to your free-market "solution" to the problem of ending racial bias and underrepresentation: it won't work unless absolutely everyone is born into the same exact circumstances and given the same level of opportunities from the minute they leave the womb.

      Until then, yes, light does have to be shed on these inequalities, so we can get to the root cause of underrepresentation within every career field. Last I checked, 12-14% of the population is black, yet in many well-to-do career fields, video games included, the percentage of blacks employed typically falls in the low-single digits. Until the job landscape accurately represents the country's racial makeup as a whole in all career fields, then inequality still exists, and is not merely "in the heads" of those who are underrepresented.

    2. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      The point is, that this is not about racism. Its about classism. It just appears to be black people in the US. In Germany they are Turkish or from East Germany. In France they are from Algeria. In the UK they are from India, Pakistan or any other place they conquered and plundered decades ago. And another example. In Germany, we have polish people. They belong mainly to the lower class. However in Poland itself they distribute over all classes. And because people would not get smarter when you move them eastwards, I assume this has something to do with the class they belong to. The point is, the real problem here is that lower class children are not becoming upper class parents. And you can see this at the US at the skin color, because a large group of poor people are black. However being poor is not their fault. It is induced by the economic and social system in the US. Also this classism is present in all capitalistic states and is not only a US problem. However a few countries are better in closing the gap than the US, UK or Germany.

    3. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Racism is the only problem I've ever seen where ignoring it is expected to somehow magically solve it.

      Were you singled out at college, or because you were too aware psychologically of your ethnicity did you single yourself out and limit your interactions between the other black students? I would guess she has been, though not overtly so. You have to have seen or experienced racism in order actually be paranoid of being discriminated against in the first place.

      (In many ways, racism is harder to deal with now than before the Civil Rights movement because it's a lot more subtle and hard to catch. This is partially because people choose to ignore the Big White Elephant in the room because it's uncomfortable to discuss, leads to flamewars, and so forth.)

      But if they work as hard as men and are equally qualified over time the situation finds a more natural balance. We tried that already.

      The problem will obviously not go away tomorrow Or ever, if you choose to just ignore it.
    4. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by urbanriot · · Score: 1
      I agree! So only 2% of developers have dark colored skin? BIG DEAL!

      I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other.
    5. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by urbanriot · · Score: 1

      What is it in Canada?

    6. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Emru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't want to read one more article about how african american people are under represented in this, that, or the other. It makes me angry even to see such headlines because yes racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. If you don't talk about it, how will people know? Talking about the problem isn't the problem; it's how people react to it. (You even seem to agree with that, in principle. As you say, "repeating the same old talking points.")

      And like everything else, discussions about under-representation aren't always economic. Right now I'm directly affected by a form of ethnic under-representation: I'm in need of a bone marrow stem cell transplant, and as a black person I have a much lower chance of finding a matching donor than a white person -- the odds of two people's human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) matching are much greater if they're of the same ethnic background, and blacks are severely under-represented in the Canadian, American and UK bone marrow donor registries.

      So should I not bring that up because it's somehow racist? It's a fact, and people can't fix it if they don't know about it. This has a direct bearing on my life, and the lives of other black people (and Asian, and Indian, and...) waiting for transplants, so I want to see more headlines about this kind of under-representation, not fewer.
    7. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by quantaman · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest problem is people tend to conform to expectations.

      I recall seeing a study a while ago (tried but couldn't find it again) where they took a group of students at the beginning of the school year, gave them "intelligence tests" that randomly told them they were smart or dumb.

      By the end of the year the students who were randomly told there weren't good students ended up performing significantly worse than the "smart" group.

      I feel this is extremely relevant to the socio-economic performance of different races. Everyone knows that black people perform poorly on tests and have trouble with gangs. Therefore if you are black, even if you're brought up well in a good environment, there's a huge cultural inertia telling you the characteristics you should have on accounts of your race.

      I suspect the way to fix that is to manage to convince young children that they're probably going to grow up to be smart and well adjusted adults regardless or race.

      How to accomplish that I naturally have no clue.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    8. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      I think the racial sensitivity that you might be describing can be observed in the summary: "African Americans" and "whites."

      Apparently, I, being a white, am less American than one of African descent?

      I dunno. If you're going to give people the "dignity" of being called a proper name like "African American," why can't I be called a "Swedish American?"

      If I'm called white, I find it entirely fair to call someone black. Frankly, I have no problem with either one, and I have black friends at college (which is primarily a white middle-class school). Of course, so is the demographic of where the school is located, so that makes sense.

      *sigh* Racism, these days, seems to mean that you're not giving a *perceived* minority group what they want... no matter what the minority group is. Even "whites."

      (interestingly, I think of eggs when I read "whites")

    9. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by akintayo · · Score: 1

      So your solution to under-representation which was due preferences being awarded to one group, is to wait and see if it settles out ? This seems like a solution that requires the aggrieved group to continue suffer disproportionately, fairness would dictate the group that benefited in the past pay more of the cost.

      I assume you are not aware of your condescending tone, and I suggest you restrict your comments until you find yourself in the position where you are in the absolute and visible minority. Reaching out to the only other Hispanic/Black/etc, in a group of 100s it is base human nature to not wish to be alone.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    10. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saddens me to see, that a response like this can get a 5 rating of insightful on /.

      The reason being that the level of arrogance in the post is so stereotypical to a debate about discrimination. It pretty much goes as follows:

      'Though not having lived your experience at all, I will tell you what your experience really is and how wrongly you see it. I can do this because I'm in the majority and therefore I'm right.'

      DigitAl56K suggests that we should just refrain from talking about any kind of discrimination and that pesky thing will just go away. Sorry, but I don't see how that is going to happen when people like DigitAl56K show such stereotypical subconscious discriminating behavior.

    11. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Roxton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your proposed solution does not demonstrate a complete understanding of the problem.

      I'm white, and was raised in a good middle-class home. My use of language, my body language, my preferred attire, my attitudes, my ethics, and my social expectations are all in line with what professional white employers are looking for, because I was raised in a similar environment to them. There's a generational difference, but it's one that any competent employer is expecting.

      People underestimate how much implicit learning goes into making someone behave the way they do. You can't just change use of language, etcetera overnight. And why should you? It's elitist and wrong to assume that someone should abandon their culture in favor of the culture that is in power.

      Now, black is not a culture, but blacks in America happen to be composed of dramatically different cultural constituents than white, so it's a useful if imperfect marker for cultural differences.

      The unintended subtext of your suggestion is that the weaker cultures will eventually be abandoned in favor of the larger, more profitable cultural hegemony.That solution may work, but I don't think it's a good one. We need to change the attitudes of the employing class towards people who are different, and we need to make it possible for different people to become a major part of the employing class.

      That's not the whole picture of course - not by a long shot - but I think it raises an important point that you've either disregarded or implicitly handled inappropriately. You have to keep driving home that a problem exists before attitudes will change.

    12. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by methuselah · · Score: 1

      blah blah blah,
      I grew up in the 70's and went to urban schools, or should I say that I dropped out of urban schools. I am short, have blond hair and blue eyes and got real tired of being beaten because someone wanted to avenge kunta kintes' honor. In all fairness the kids i went to school with certainly weren't what I encounter today. Yes people in lollipop land i still live in a neighborhood that is mostly black. Racism is a 2 way street. Its liberal soft racism, the rephrasing of things like oh, say welfare into a new thing called an entitlement via the term public assistance that has created the mess that some well meaning folks want to call racial relations. You can apologize, rationalize and grovel all you want to from your white suburb about how enlightened you are till you are blue in the face. I say you don't have the first clue what you are talking about. Every day I am expected to feel sorry for the poor black man who is under represented here and there over this and that and I am frankly tired of it. I associate with people that I have something in common with. I don't see a group of white people with shaved heads and swastika tattoos and say to myself ooh, let me run over and hang out with the white guys. The same is true with the people that I work with. If people insist on being dreadful to be around I will figure out a way to get rid of them. This may, and has included removing myself from the situation. I am so sick and tired of people trying to put the fact that some are just not willing to make any effort yet, they are shocked that no one wants to be around them or wants them around. Its not a race thing it is a behavior thing!

    13. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Stellian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      racism exists but we only fuel racism by carving out sectors of society by race and speaking to how disadvantaged they are. No amount of wishful thinking and pretends will make race inequality go away by itself. If there is a strong correlation between race and academic success - when common sense dictates that there should be no such correlation - we need to know why the hell it's that way: talking about it is a first step into fixing it.
      You position is basically like saying, disabled people in our town choose not to use the subway - the fact that there's no wheelchair access in the station has nothing to do with it.
      If there's no disabled person to be seen in the subway, and no black in a cube farm, we need to ask ourselves some questions - and simply asking the questions is not fueling discrimination, but helping us understand the problem, if there is one.
    14. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by karolgajewski · · Score: 1

      Those damned Newfies. I still don't trust them, or consider them true Canadians.

      --
      - .k. -
    15. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Why are we not discussing how there are too few Indian characters in modern-day computer games


      We've come a long way from Custer's Revenge. Just in the past few years we've had games featuring them: Prey and Turok.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    16. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by Lexi_the_linux_girl · · Score: 1

      Don't ever think Canada is a promised land without racism, it would be Natives on the bottom rung here in Canada.

      The segregation and relocation of Natives on to reserves was nothing less than Apartheid. The destruction of culture via residential schools, has left many natives not knowing their own history, faith or languages. Land claims are not respected, and rarely considered. Poverty, alcohol and drug use among the Native population is staggeringly high, and it seems when a Native does leave the reservation, the racism and stereotypes gives them little chance of gainful employment.

      It seems that persons of Native decent must completely assimilate into the dominant European culture (or be only part native and look European), if they to escape poverty. After they shed any trappings of their own culture, and are working in the cities, they will overhear racist statements on a regular basis dues to the stereotypes of natives as being lazy drunks.

    17. Re:Stop with this racial coddling by atrizzah · · Score: 1

      "Simply let things work themselves out over time". Wow. So I guess you don't mind being the guy to march into inner city schools to tell the brown kids that it's just not their time. Just kidding, believe me, they already get the point.

      I'm a black engineer who grew up, went to college, and now works in a predominantly white environment. By all rights, you'd imagine that I'd be used to being one of the few brown faces in a room, but it IS intimidating. The fact is, racism is alive and well in our society. I actually HEAR people making blanket remarks all the time about other ethnic groups, and it makes me wonder, what do they say about my ethnic group when I'm not around. It's not paranoia, it's fact: I'm judged by the color of my skin as soon as I walk in the door. At times, it's palpable.

      I'm not blaming anybody, or saying it's a white problem, because it's not. And I'm not whining about it, I'm just telling you how it is. If you don't believe me, try walking through an area you don't traditionally belong, like a poor black neighborhood, and see how comfortable you feel. But, I guess it doesn't matter much does it, because you don't have any business to do there anyway.

  21. Single elven female warrior by someme2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How much longer are we going to rely on the bald space marine? Or how much longer are we going to rely on the Elven female warrior whose armor barely covers her breasts? Is that all we can do with this medium or is there more that can be done?" I think some people just don't push themselves hard enough.

    I think it's pretty obvious that the problem is not people pushing themselves to softly... 95% of all characters in any popular media are heavily clicheed. Even though every single game designer, author, movie director, musician and whatnot would really like to do better. But you don't get project funding for better, you get funding for dependable and predictable sales. As "they" say: It's a hit driven business (with "it" being just about everything).

    Characters must always meet expectations so that no one changes the channel because they don't understand the plot anymore after fetching beer from the fridge. Consequently any clearly identifiable group is badly misrepresented in popular media.


    Also, Slashdot readers, you just have to love this quote from the article:

    I mean, there's hip-hop in Cuba, there's hip-hop in Poland, there's hip-hop in the Soviet Union;

    Knock yourselves out...

    --
    You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
    Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    1. Re:Single elven female warrior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... 'in Soviet Union, hip hops you'?

      Seriously, I've got nothing, here.

    2. Re:Single elven female warrior by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Yesh hip-hop beYisrael!

      Sorry, I had to. My favorite hip-hop group is from there.

  22. Vann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a very insightful comment from the article link that I took the liberty to copy here so more people get a chance to see it.

    Author: Areala

    Any time you bring race or gender bias into any particular medium, there's going to be problems. And while I can certainly see that there is a disparity, the first thing one has to look at is that numbers don't tell you everything.

    Being female, when I was growing up, I heard all the time about how women were paid less than men, and how terrible this was. And while the numbers are true, they don't tell the whole story. Women, by and large, simply tend to go after jobs that traditionally pay less. Female teachers outnumber male teachers in every school in the US, for example--this is not because men are being "held back" from teaching by an elite group of high-powered females in schools and universities, it's because there are more women interested in the job than men, and fewer males are getting their degrees and licenses than females are. Numbers alone are meaningless without a reason to go along with them.

    On the subject of ethnicity, the only counterpoints I can offer to the subject of "bias" against any particular ethnicity are as follows. First, the majority of gamers are male, and the majority of game developers are male; this isn't surprising considering that males (especially in the teenage demographic) are statistically more interested in gaming than females. We're not the rare birds we once were, but we're still not as common. Boys use video games as bonding experiences and social experiences. By and large, girls tend to bond and socialize in other ways. Men are more apt to enter the field of game design because, statistically speaking, they are more apt to be interested in it than their female counterparts are (remember the teacher analogy). It's not that the top-tier of every gaming company is conspiring to keep women out, it's that they're having a hard time finding any who are at all interested in the field period. Black or white, asian or european, it's going to be guys right now who are filling the ranks. And gaming isn't the garage-based hobby it was twenty years ago--with budgets of games in the next generation hovering in the double-digits of millions of dollars for a major, AAA title like Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, or Gears of War, and gaming revenue surpassing Hollywood in terms of dollars generated, gaming companies are only interested in hiring the best people for the right positions. If you can't program, or you aren't as good a designer as somebody else, or you lack the experience a company is looking for, it doesn't matter what colour your skin is or whether you have two X chromosomes: the job will not be yours. Plain and simple.

    Point two is something that an awful lot of people seem to forget about gaming when this topic comes up for discussion, and that is that video games are all about fantasy. There's a reason why Microsoft has not made a multi-platinum-selling video game about a geeky programmer who works a 9-5 job programming the next iteration of Windows; it's a fantasy that appeals to so few people that those who would be interested in playing the game are already doing it in real life.

    Fantasy in games is all about getting to do things that you can't do in real life, either because of physical, social, ethical or legal ramifications or because the universe we inhabit is not the same as the universe of a video game. No matter how hard we might want it, none of us will be able to be Joan of Arc leading an attack on the English in an effort to restore France's deposed dauphin to his rightful place on the throne. Unless we play a video game.

    Since gaming is all about fantasy, it stands to reason that the things we want to fantasize about most are the things we will never, ever get to do in real life. There's a reason Madden NFL sells millions of copies with each year's release: there are millions of people all over the world who can never themselves play a game of professional football in a r

  23. Someone call the waahmbulance by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The tech sector is the *least* racist sector ever. We're importing Indians, Chinese, Japanese, etc to fill these jobs. Do they honestly think they don't want to give the jobs to local blacks or women?

    No, you'll find women and blacks look up to their heroes like fiddy cent and Paris Hilton and aspire to have money but not do things like programming classes or taking trig and or Calc in high school. Women much rather marry an older man with money than work 12 hours a day in front of a computer.

    They don't want to work for it, they obviously rather sit around and play video games and listen to rap so they won't work in the industry and the industry will end up importing other minorities who aren't so lazy.

    1. Re:Someone call the waahmbulance by Chineseyes · · Score: 1

      Oh gosh I don't even know where to start with this one. Black people don't look up to characters like 50 cent, you need to look around more the guy has sold approximately 30 million albums and they were bought by mostly WHITE suburbanites. Anyone who sells that many albums has to have a HUGE white fanbase. As far as education... In many poor HS's (I went to one) you will be lucky if you even have a teacher who knows anything beyond basic algebra, much less calc. These classes aren't even offered and if they are they are taught by someone who just took a community college calc course and barely knows the subject themselves. When I was in HS I was teaching the calc course because the teacher did not know the material. I had to beg school administration for higher level books which the superintendent of schools pulled strings to loan from another school district. You talk as if many of these kids can just waltz into their local high school and get the education that they need. We didn't even have a computer science course in my HS but the three of us who were driven enough once again BEGGED for some access to computers and you know what we got?!? A VAX system and one ratty algorithms and data structures book from the 80s with missing pages in the FUCKING YEAR 2000. The exact same calc teacher who didn't know calc taught our computer science course. When there are two sets of children and one set has access to a higher level education by default but the other set of kids has to beg and plead just to get access to that same level of education which group is going to have a higher percentage of successful students? I grew up with people who were just as intelligent as I was but they didn't improve for one of two reasons. 1.) They didn't even know there was more out there. You may take your awareness of higher education for granted but there are people out there who don't know anyone who has gotten anything higher than a HS education, if that. When the bar is that low and the school system doesn't tell the students that they can achieve more how is a 15 year old suppose to know otherwise? 2.) They could make the cut academically but at the young age of 15 it was too much to ask that they help their parents pay the bills, take classes AND fight just to get some semblance of a decent education. As for women, my fiancée, who went to an equally inept school district and is now published (as an undergraduate) in the journal Advanced Materials says Paris Hilton was the inspiration behind all the work she did in polymer chemistry. The waahmbulance will be out next time masses of slashdotters are crying about H1B visas and offshoring.

      --
      I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

      --A wise old fart named SC0RN
    2. Re:Someone call the waahmbulance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a problem in our country. How do you improve it? IMHO you improve it by holding teachers and administrators accountable. In California, their are more administrators in a school district than their are teachers. Most of the money goes to cover the bureaucracy costs. Dean of schools, Dean of curriculum, Dean of Attendance, etc..., and their assistants, and other support staff. Teachers should be REQUIRED to show competence in the subject they are going to teach. Just because they have a teaching degree does not mean they know their subject. These things will not happen because the respective UNIONS feel that it is discriminatory to their members, nevermind the fact that they may be protecting an individual who is shorting our children in their education. Remember The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the Bureaucracy.

    3. Re:Someone call the waahmbulance by FiloEleven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh gosh I don't even know where to start with this one. Perhaps with some line breaks?

      =)
    4. Re:Someone call the waahmbulance by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      That is all well in good but if a handful of kids can get something (even if it is shit) then imagine what the parents could get if they actually pulled together and demanded those sort of things.

      I'm more than happy to admit a lot of the problem lies with the parents as well as the individual.

      But this constant finger pointing at the businesses (who, funnily enough, have the most money) is a load of BS. Yet people demand they do something about it.

      Well they don't have time to wait for high schoolers to graduate high school and uni. So they import people.

      If parents are happy that poor countries have a superior education system than they do then their kids will never be any better. That's their fault and in fact I think you'll find a lot of things are the fault of parents. They're mostly incompetent these days.

      But the individual still has to want to do something and from my experience, the presence of a math class doesn't all of the sudden make girls want to be math geeks.

      Your lady loses a lot of points for saying a Paris Hilton is inspiration for anything.

  24. Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less than 13% of the US population is black, 25% of them are living in poverty, 20% don't have a high school degree, and only 18% have a college degree. Isn't the answer obvious? Furthermore, who cares what race programmers are? OMG we need more black programmers now! Why? More than half of the programmers at my company were born in India, and we have at least one black programmer. Were they hired because they are ethnic minorities? No, there are a large number of international students here, and we hire whoever is qualified.

  25. Re:who cares by g0dsp33d · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, and all lazy persons must be stupid huh? You productivist.

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
  26. African-American by hlt32 · · Score: 0

    Couldn't some of the 5 people interviewed be say ... Caribbean in descent?

    Labelling all black Americans as "African-Americans" seems shortsighted and as racist as many other alternatives.

    "Oh ... you look black, you must be African!"

    --
    à_à
    1. Re:African-American by akintayo · · Score: 1

      If African American is the term used to identify Americans of African descent, then it is correct to use the label for Americans who are "people of Caribbean descent". As they would be Americans and they are of African descent also, likewise the term is appropriate for Americans who are from Africa. If you were to classify someone as Asian American, you don't indicate when the person migrated, so why is it applicable for blacks ?

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    2. Re:African-American by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Homo sapiens emerged from Africa. By your argument, we should call everyone in the US an African American. I don't personally have a problem with that, but I suspect that wasn't your intent.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    3. Re:African-American by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      How am I to know that someone is american at all? They may not be a citizen, and they may not care either - better to go on visible characteristics. Black covers the a.a. thing as well as avoiding the question of where they're from, which I often don't know. Asians are fairly easy to identify by physical characteristics, so why not?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  27. What a crock of **** by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "programmers typically seem to be socially-stunted and have personality and mental issues"

    Who modded this crap insighful? Where did you get that , Cliched Quotes R Us? I know plenty of coders who are perfectly normal people , in fact I don't think I've ever met one who was the alleged stereotype aspergers and I only ever met one who I'd have called socially stunted.

    "In comparison, most black people and women I've come across, tend to be more outgoing and sociable."

    Women tend to be more outgoing than men. Black people ? It varies just as much as whites or asians. Are you just making this up as you go along? sounds to me like you've never mixed with anyone and are just going by the lyrics on your Craig David albums,

    "because there are a lot more interesting things to do in this world if you don't mind interacting with regular people."

    Yeah , like not posting trite made up crap you pulled out of your arse on slashdot.

    1. Re:What a crock of **** by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I was relaying personal experience. Personal experience, by its personal nature, is not something someone else can state is false.

      You state a good case though. Your aggression and ad hominem attacks demonstrate your humanity and mental good health. Being able to debate subjects with a cold logicality is, I believe, an aberration of true human nature, and a burden I shall have to accept.

    2. Re:What a crock of **** by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "and a burden I shall have to accept."

      Before you accept it you might want to actually give it a try.

    3. Re:What a crock of **** by vertinox · · Score: 1

      You state a good case though. Your aggression and ad hominem attacks demonstrate your humanity and mental good health. Being able to debate subjects with a cold logicality is, I believe, an aberration of true human nature, and a burden I shall have to accept.

      This has been the best comeback statement I have seen for a reply in a long time...

      But I think it comes down to two people arguing anecdotal evidence.

      However, if one takes a natural selection review of who works what job, people who do not like to be social will tend to quit jobs that require them to be social and persons who enjoy being sociable will tend to keep working at jobs that have a great deal of socializing.

      But that doesn't mean there are other factors involved such as pay and location that determines if someone will work a particular career.

      On a side note, I'd argue that a certain category of persons are attracted to computer technology as a child due to the fact it doesn't involve other persons. This will later drive them towards a career in coding or computers because they are familiar with it. Doesn't mean there aren't exceptions.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:What a crock of **** by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      On a side note, I'd argue that a certain category of persons are attracted to computer technology as a child due to the fact it doesn't involve other persons. This will later drive them towards a career in coding or computers because they are familiar with it. Doesn't mean there aren't exceptions.

      This is a great point.

      It is tragic to keep calling on anecdotes, but it is certainly my personal experience that - certainly in the lower classes, in which I was raised - families with minority backgrounds socialize more with each other, both intra and inter family.

      It would take quite a bit of research, but I wonder if it could be shown that the development industry has a statistically significant number of "only children" or children separated significantly by age from other siblings versus those from larger, more integrated family groups. I'd personally believe this to be the case.

      Given this, and given that data show that ethnic minorities (certainly here in Europe) tend to have more children per family, this could perhaps add another couple of reasons for the disparity.

    5. Re:What a crock of **** by archont · · Score: 1

      I know plenty of coders who are perfectly normal people , in fact I don't think I've ever met one who was the alleged stereotype aspergers and I only ever met one who I'd have called socially stunted. That only goes to show we've learned to act normal for a time quite well. Nobody said we're stupid. Socially illiterate is another thing.. As for there being few black coders, not very surprising. White people usually got the better payed positions - I'm not sure if it was for objective or subjective reasons and I don't really care. A stereotypical geek is white ( white and nerdy, oh yeah ) so there's probably less peer pressure for white geeks than black geeks. Not that geeks would by definition give a shit but still..
    6. Re:What a crock of **** by VoltCurve · · Score: 0

      So, calling someone an idiot for being an idiot is a sign of mental health issues? I will alert Scientology at once.

  28. Rationalized view on things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copied this insightful comment from the article link. Took the liberty to post it here for some additional views.

    Author: Areala

    Any time you bring race or gender bias into any particular medium, there's going to be problems. And while I can certainly see that there is a disparity, the first thing one has to look at is that numbers don't tell you everything.

    Being female, when I was growing up, I heard all the time about how women were paid less than men, and how terrible this was. And while the numbers are true, they don't tell the whole story. Women, by and large, simply tend to go after jobs that traditionally pay less. Female teachers outnumber male teachers in every school in the US, for example--this is not because men are being "held back" from teaching by an elite group of high-powered females in schools and universities, it's because there are more women interested in the job than men, and fewer males are getting their degrees and licenses than females are. Numbers alone are meaningless without a reason to go along with them.

    On the subject of ethnicity, the only counterpoints I can offer to the subject of "bias" against any particular ethnicity are as follows. First, the majority of gamers are male, and the majority of game developers are male; this isn't surprising considering that males (especially in the teenage demographic) are statistically more interested in gaming than females. We're not the rare birds we once were, but we're still not as common. Boys use video games as bonding experiences and social experiences. By and large, girls tend to bond and socialize in other ways. Men are more apt to enter the field of game design because, statistically speaking, they are more apt to be interested in it than their female counterparts are (remember the teacher analogy). It's not that the top-tier of every gaming company is conspiring to keep women out, it's that they're having a hard time finding any who are at all interested in the field period. Black or white, asian or european, it's going to be guys right now who are filling the ranks. And gaming isn't the garage-based hobby it was twenty years ago--with budgets of games in the next generation hovering in the double-digits of millions of dollars for a major, AAA title like Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, or Gears of War, and gaming revenue surpassing Hollywood in terms of dollars generated, gaming companies are only interested in hiring the best people for the right positions. If you can't program, or you aren't as good a designer as somebody else, or you lack the experience a company is looking for, it doesn't matter what colour your skin is or whether you have two X chromosomes: the job will not be yours. Plain and simple.

    Point two is something that an awful lot of people seem to forget about gaming when this topic comes up for discussion, and that is that video games are all about fantasy. There's a reason why Microsoft has not made a multi-platinum-selling video game about a geeky programmer who works a 9-5 job programming the next iteration of Windows; it's a fantasy that appeals to so few people that those who would be interested in playing the game are already doing it in real life.

    Fantasy in games is all about getting to do things that you can't do in real life, either because of physical, social, ethical or legal ramifications or because the universe we inhabit is not the same as the universe of a video game. No matter how hard we might want it, none of us will be able to be Joan of Arc leading an attack on the English in an effort to restore France's deposed dauphin to his rightful place on the throne. Unless we play a video game.

    Since gaming is all about fantasy, it stands to reason that the things we want to fantasize about most are the things we will never, ever get to do in real life. There's a reason Madden NFL sells millions of copies with each year's release: there are millions of people all over the world who can never themselves play a game of professional football in a real stadium, but

  29. If more blacks worked hard in school... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...perhaps they might be able to get decent jobs. They don't , so they can't. Frankly I couldn't care less. Every other race manages it except them - look how many poor indians manage to get good IT jobs - but the blacks always find an excuse for their underperformance. Sorry homies , no excuses , you're just lazy, feckless, workshy idiots and the only things you're good at are pummeling each others faces in a boxing ring or shouting into a mic with your pants down by your knees.

  30. Obviously by fishyfool · · Score: 4, Funny

    They'd rather play than develop. Can't say I blame them.

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  31. Not a suprising result by prefec2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In the US black people are over represented in the lower class. This means, the percentage of black people belonging to the lower class in relation to all black people in the US is high than compared to the whole US society. In the lower class it is more common that young especially young male humans have an interest in gaming. This does not mean that in other classes young male do not game. It just says that the possibility that you like gaming and additionally do it quite often, increases when you are in a lower class. In Europe you get similar results. In Germany for example you can make the same analysis and you will get as a result: Turkish people are unrepresented in the gaming industry. But over represented in the gamers league. The cause is quite similar. If you are poor you get worse education. This is a institutional problem. Means schools treat you different when you are poor then when you are rich. So you get bad grades, which isn't helpful in getting to university or college. At least their is a way out of it. The Scandinavian found it. They help every kid. And they help the parents. But they are not on the "competition trip" like the USA, UK or Germany.

    1. Re:Not a suprising result by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      It's not that the schools specifically treat them different, it's that often the money for 'inner city' or 'ghetto' schools is sparse, meaning the options for the school to provide programs and facilities to their students is more limited than it is in the suburb or other more affluent areas. Fix the desirability of these schools to while your at it, often the teachers want more money to work at those schools. Why? Because the PTA is often a joke with 5 or 6 concerned parents for 500 students and even more often the parents and community are against you rather than for you... If little Jaquan walks out of class every day and little Jaquan's mom doesn't care, how does that make you feel as their teacher...? And how do you keep discipline, when your only tools are talking to the kids or giving them detentions they won't serve? Often these kids can't be kicked out of school either (especially if they have a IEP or are considered to be needing of more help than normal for any number of reasons). Often these kids no the school can't do crap and so behave anyway they feel like it, with the school the ones who suffer... One class I know of stole the glasses of a substitute and made fun of her while she looked for them. What did the school do? Nothing. Why? Because we can't. We aren't allowed to do more than call the police and most likely the police won't be able to find out anything about what happened and nothing will ever come of it. But would you want to work in a place like that...?

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  32. Whoops... by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

    Didn't realize I wasn't logged in... You can attribute the above to me, however.

    1. Re:Whoops... by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      The real issue, as a earlier poster pointed out, is probably more socio-economic. What do you need to practice programming? An expensive computer and expensive software... something that black children are far less likely to have available, due to the disproportionate number of blacks who live in poverty in the US.

      Nonsense. I moved out on my own early in life and worked my way through school. I always had a computer growing up because I prioritized it. Many of my friends had cell phones, drank beer and alcohol more often or had various other things (gaming consoles, nicer sneakers/boots/clothes, etc.) because they prioritized them.

      I also know a lot of people who lived in abject poverty because all their available income after basic expenses went to drugs, alcohol, cigarettes and baser forms of entertainment.

      I missed out on a lot of opportunities growing up because I had to decide where every one of my hard earned dollars went and more often than not I decided to put it towards my own self improvement for the future rather than instant gratification.

      A computer now, much like years and years ago when I was growing up, can be had for very cheap. Alternately you can have a weekends worth of partying with your friends. People make choices; stop patronizing them by saying their lives are pre-determined and out of their control and maybe people can start to learn to better themselves rather than learn to complain about their lot in life.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Whoops... by PixelScuba · · Score: 1

      Right, but you used the important word "prioritize". If you grow up in poverty, a computer is very difficult to obtain... and it is not very important. Spending money on necessities like food, rent and clothes is a higher priority than owning a computer. I think it's great that, at an early age, you chose to invest in computers, despite financial hardships. Only, you're not the norm among lower class/poor families... you're actually an outlier. A great story, but you're just one out of thousands... my argument is still valid, poor people will not usually have access to expensive equipment (yes, computer are "cheap", but to a poor family it's a massive investment).

  33. The take on GTA by IorDMUX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So "GTA III," -- a Mafioso stereotype with a huge amount of cinema fiction to support that. It's sort of a cultural joke. We all know that Italians aren't like that but we know Mafioso gangsters are. Do we remove race from it? No, they're just gangsters. "Vice City" is just '80s "Miami Vice." So even with the Cubanos and Latinos we know all Cubanos aren't like that. "San Andreas" gets scary because it's basically what people think black people are.
    So... he's saying that blatant stereotypes are okay, as long as they are not of black people? Am I missing something?

    I've seen all three games. I'm Italian. My wife is Latina. And I'm not offended by any of it. But this interviewer seems to be saying that my lack of offense is because there is some fundamental difference in the race portrayals... I thought it was that I can choose to be offended or to be entertained by any of these blatant, joking, stereotypes.

    I don't get it.
    --
    >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    1. Re:The take on GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Im half italian half argentinian, and live in miami.
      I wasnt offended by any of the GTA's
      I guess some people wont realize all black people arent zombies living in haiti with some plot involving the umbrella corporation.

    2. Re:The take on GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Didn't rtfa of course, but from the section you quoted I think he's making the difference between the mafioso gangsters of GTA3 and the black gangsters of GTA:SA by likening our perception of mafioso gangsters to our perception of, for example, witches, wizards, devils, etc; we know that's fantasy image, whereas we don't know that the gang-banging thugs from the hood are a fantasy image and are instead plagued by fears about being carjacked by a negro.

      I can understand it in those terms, though it seems more like a parody of racism rather than a legitimate argument.

    3. Re:The take on GTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, you missed the point.

      He wasn't saying you're allowed to make stereotypes or anything like that.

      Rather, that when stereo-types are made people react to them differently if they're about black people.

      You yourself found no insult to the italian and latina references, but did you find any of them accurate? Of course not, because you know better.

      What the poster is saying, is that instead of people seeing the portrayal of black characters in San Andreas as a stereo-type, they're seeing is as typical black behaviour, whereas for Italians and Latinas in similar games they're seen only as stereo-types: not every Italian you cut off on the street is going to take to you with a blow-torch.

    4. Re:The take on GTA by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      The problem with stereotypes is that it's far too easy to categorize people.

      We see it all the time with politics and well, just about any kind of organization anyone tries to do with people.

      Programmers versus Engineers.

      Women versus Men.

      the east versus the west.

      Keynesian economics versus Traditional economics.

      there are so many ways to lump people together into groups that one way is bound to be "more accurate" than another and therefore "more right". It's not, really. it's just luck when people guess correctly. you just have billions of guessers and some of them are bound to guess well.

      As a fellow Italian myself I also don't get offended by the stereotypes, but then I don't get hammered with them every day. there are apparently a LOT of people in the churches of the south and in the businesses of the south who have made it the order of the day, every day, that it's "us versus them." I don't live in an environment like that so it's not really my place to say that they're wrong.

      But you do have to realize it's like a whole different world for them.

      Frankly I hope that this kind of argument creates some new debates. I, for one, welcome any attempt to diversify the gaming environment and introduce new stuff into our games.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    5. Re:The take on GTA by Veggiesama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So... he's saying that blatant stereotypes are okay, as long as they are not of black people? Am I missing something? Yes. He's saying that most of us recognize that the idea of the "Italian gangster" is built upon layers and layers of shared cultural fiction. We go see movies about the Mob because our culture likes some of the themes that dwell under the surface--living the independently wealthy life, creating passionate alliances and rivalries, doling out vigilante justice ("Hey, nobody backstabs Tony and gets away wit' it!"), and so on.

      Most people recognize that the "Italian gangster" is mostly a fiction. We aren't afraid of getting hit by the Mob. Having a big, greasy-haired guy come up to our business demanding "protection money" is just laughable. Even old Bugs Bunny cartoons parodied the hell out of the Mob. It's become a sort of "cultural joke." Given that Italian-Americans are now pretty well-integrated in America (though it certainly wasn't the case at first), all the way to the upper echelons of business and government, even they aren't threatened by these silly caricatures. Most Italians I know love Mob flicks.

      We see the stereotype for what it is, and the GTA series does a wonderful job at parodying and satirizing concepts like the "Italian gangster."

      However, I do not believe that the majority of Americans are able to clearly differentiate reality and fiction when it comes to the portrayal of African-Americans. Our characterization of the African-American is so inextricably tied to ideas like crime, poverty, violence, saying naughty words, and so on, that we have a difficult time seeing parody when it's staring at us in the face.

      The interviewee thinks that "San Andreas gets scary because it's basically what people think black people are." While whites might laugh off the "Italian ganster," many of us whites are positively terrified of black men. He fears that we won't get the jokes, since our prejudices tell us that the jokes are funny because "that's how black people act, lol!", rather than the jokes being funny because they're overblown stereotypes of how we white people think black people act. So essentially, many of the jokes are at the white audience's expense, when you think about it.

      Take the scene where CJ and the gang narrowly survive a Ballaz drive-by and are forced to escape. While you're driving, two of the characters use their uzis to defend the car. The last character, Big Smoke, won't fight until he finishes his fast food meal, and he spends the entire time in the back seat, bitching about his food. The scene pits two black stereotypes against one another--random drive-bys and large consumption of fast food--and forces you to escape while listening to this inane, absurd argument about whether Big Smoke should eat or shoot. I about died from laughter. (Link here if you're curious) Why is this funny? To me, it's funny because I'm forced into thinking about this competition between two ridiculous cultural stereotypes, both of which are paraded around through some parts of our country as spoken-under-your-breath truths: Black people love killing each other. Black people also love fried chicken. The question the scene raises is, which do black people like more: killing or eating? The very idea of asking such a bigoted question is repulsive to most of us, yet we laugh despite ourselves.

      I loved GTA: San Andreas. I am sad that the original interviewee never completed the game, because I thought it was certainly the strongest title in the series. I will admit that the preview trailers and first hour of the game discouraged me from playing, because I was worried that Rockstar was undercutting themselves by relying too much on modern-day blaxploitation to encourage new audiences. Maybe they were, in some ways, but overall I felt that San Andreas had the most interesting and likable characters of the series, by far.
    6. Re:The take on GTA by philmack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Having a big, greasy-haired guy come up to our business demanding "protection money" is just laughable. You've never tried to operate a restaurant or small business in New York.
      The people are not necessarily big or greasy-haired. But extortion is common, and it sickens me that this happens while at the same time police are spending time and taxpayer dollars in speed traps and prostitution stings.
      ~Phil
    7. Re:The take on GTA by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Black people love killing each other.

      They do, at least more than other ethnic groups. The majority of murders are black on black; You don't have to like it, but it's hard to argue with facts.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:The take on GTA by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly reasonable to argue with facts, and once you've arrived at a conclusion, you should be be on the look-out for alternatives.

      Take the fact that there are proportionally more black prisoners in this country than white prisoners.

      Some people take the easy explanation and claim that black people just commit more crimes. They're genetically or culturally inferior in some way. That wraps it up.

      Others are more willing to look at larger cultural effects at work, or maybe they try figure out what's going on in these guys' minds. Either way, I think we can find more reasonable explanations when we take more than a simple set of statistics into the grand equation.

    9. Re:The take on GTA by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly willing to accept that there's racial bias in how laws are enforced, but not in regards to bodycount.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    10. Re:The take on GTA by sesshomaru · · Score: 1
      Yeah, my Dad was a cop in New Jersey. He hates Godfather-type movies with a white hot passion. He was grudgingly amused by The Sopranoes after a while, though he was against it when it first came on. He decided that while it took some liberties, it actually showed a lot of what these thugs were really like and wasn't glorifying them.

      Oh, and my Dad explained to me about the speed traps thing, and why cops seemed to come down harder on basically honest citizens than gangster-types. How did he put it? Oh yes, "Judges can be intimidated." No point in arresting someone if you know they are going to walk. It bothered him sometimes.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  34. Well... by khristian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I entered the CS course (Brasil), along with me came a guy from Africa. He spent a year on it, and then changed to Law school. I guess they don't want to work "underground" as programmers (it's pretty dark where I work) or something like that, they want to be recognized. Even if you come with the "they are poor", it's a public university we're talking about here. And a lot of the funding goes for students who can prove they are poor.

    Apart from that, I don't think anyone should be offended by being called "black" or "white". How would it look if I, being white as a candle, wanted to sue someone for calling me white, or even whitey?

    --
    http://derkosak.blogspot.com - That's a blog.
  35. Rationalized view on things by G3NE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Copied this insightful comment from the article link. I took the liberty to post it here for some additional views (I apologize in advance for any copies I posted by accident as "Anonymous Coward").

    Author: Areala

    Any time you bring race or gender bias into any particular medium, there's going to be problems. And while I can certainly see that there is a disparity, the first thing one has to look at is that numbers don't tell you everything.

    Being female, when I was growing up, I heard all the time about how women were paid less than men, and how terrible this was. And while the numbers are true, they don't tell the whole story. Women, by and large, simply tend to go after jobs that traditionally pay less. Female teachers outnumber male teachers in every school in the US, for example--this is not because men are being "held back" from teaching by an elite group of high-powered females in schools and universities, it's because there are more women interested in the job than men, and fewer males are getting their degrees and licenses than females are. Numbers alone are meaningless without a reason to go along with them.

    On the subject of ethnicity, the only counterpoints I can offer to the subject of "bias" against any particular ethnicity are as follows. First, the majority of gamers are male, and the majority of game developers are male; this isn't surprising considering that males (especially in the teenage demographic) are statistically more interested in gaming than females. We're not the rare birds we once were, but we're still not as common. Boys use video games as bonding experiences and social experiences. By and large, girls tend to bond and socialize in other ways. Men are more apt to enter the field of game design because, statistically speaking, they are more apt to be interested in it than their female counterparts are (remember the teacher analogy). It's not that the top-tier of every gaming company is conspiring to keep women out, it's that they're having a hard time finding any who are at all interested in the field period. Black or white, asian or european, it's going to be guys right now who are filling the ranks. And gaming isn't the garage-based hobby it was twenty years ago--with budgets of games in the next generation hovering in the double-digits of millions of dollars for a major, AAA title like Final Fantasy, Grand Theft Auto, or Gears of War, and gaming revenue surpassing Hollywood in terms of dollars generated, gaming companies are only interested in hiring the best people for the right positions. If you can't program, or you aren't as good a designer as somebody else, or you lack the experience a company is looking for, it doesn't matter what colour your skin is or whether you have two X chromosomes: the job will not be yours. Plain and simple.

    Point two is something that an awful lot of people seem to forget about gaming when this topic comes up for discussion, and that is that video games are all about fantasy. There's a reason why Microsoft has not made a multi-platinum-selling video game about a geeky programmer who works a 9-5 job programming the next iteration of Windows; it's a fantasy that appeals to so few people that those who would be interested in playing the game are already doing it in real life.

    Fantasy in games is all about getting to do things that you can't do in real life, either because of physical, social, ethical or legal ramifications or because the universe we inhabit is not the same as the universe of a video game. No matter how hard we might want it, none of us will be able to be Joan of Arc leading an attack on the English in an effort to restore France's deposed dauphin to his rightful place on the throne. Unless we play a video game.

    Since gaming is all about fantasy, it stands to reason that the things we want to fantasize about most are the things we will never, ever get to do in real life. There's a reason Madden NFL sells millions of copies with each year's release: there are millions of people all over the world

  36. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ask them! I don't know. I just know I don't want to go near that damn industry. In fact, maybe it's too much like slave labour, and they are smart enough to stay away?

  37. "than whites" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, European Americans.

    Bad! Bad! Racist! oooooohhhh!

  38. Enough african american already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You aren't special. If I'm white, then you are black. I'm not a 'western-europe' american. You aren't an african-american, unless maybe you were born in africa and moved here. Even then, if you want to be an american, then be one. We don't need to label it any further than that.

    I'm also annoyed at people who are 'proud' of shit that is beyond their control. If you want to be proud of something, be proud of what you have accomplished in life. This goes for race, country of origin, whatever.

    As for 'offensive' imagery in video games, or elsewhere. Get the fuck over it.

  39. What about blonde-haired developers? by sahonen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quick, do a study about how many blonde-haired people play games vs. develop them. The video game industry is blondeist! Seriously, why do we still use race as a primary factor in surveys when what they're looking for is economic and social factors? That's where the racism is happening, not in the hiring practices of developers.

    --
    Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    1. Re:What about blonde-haired developers? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      Considering that being blonde requires a specific combination of genes that make your hair blonde, and that they are naturally rare, I would say that your example is flawed.

      Black people aren't a minority of the world, but there are extremely few in the industry.

      Blonde people are, however, a minority of the world.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    2. Re:What about blonde-haired developers? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Considering that being blonde requires a specific combination of genes that make your hair blonde, And being black doesn't require a specific combination of genes? Anyway, my point here is that race is not any more relevant a characteristic to judge someone by than what color their hair is or any number of other superficial characteristics that someone is born with. What this survey should have done was analyze the socio economic backgrounds of gamers compared to game developers, which would produce a far more relevant comparison. Instead it took the easy way out and pulled the race card. THAT is racist.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    3. Re:What about blonde-haired developers? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Black people aren't a minority of the world

      That depends on your definition of black. If you classify ethnicity using the same system as the UK Census then they are, because the non-black Chinese and Indian populations comprise about 50% of the world population.

      However, whether they are or not misses the point. To consider the world population in the context of the videogames industry is ludicrous, because the industry is highly concentrated in a handful of countries. Moreover, given the use of the term "African Americans" it's reasonable to assume that the context is the US of A.

  40. Not enough white's in rap music by Maestro485 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Made up statistic:

    Despite the fact that a large percentage of rap music fans are white, only about 2% actually produce rap music! Seriously, who the hell cares? Some people like products of different cultures, whether music or games or anything else. This is a good thing.
  41. Re:who cares by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And being a "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into computers. Give it up. You can't change the definition of a word yourself. The overwhelming majority of English speakers have already decided the definition; and that definition most definitely has something to do with race. :)

  42. Hint: you're CANADIAN. by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

    I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

    If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

    1. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe it or not, race DOES play a different factor in a society with a huge black minority that's been systematically oppressed for most of the past 3 centuries.

      So you believe placing further stigma on a person's race relative to their career is going to help, or hurt this cause?

      I'm guessing the black people you grew up with, poor and otherwise, didn't grow up in an entirely-black-and-Latino ghetto, weren't marked by heavy urban accents, and probably didn't even have to grow up in an area with utterly failed justice and education systems.

      I'm not going to get into a pissing match over who has the worst schools because that could go on all day. Justice systems? Ditto. As for urban accents? Yes, I've seen people cling to ghetto slang to the point where they steadfastly refuse to speak anything approaching proper English. I've seen these people fail miserably. I've also seen many people from "urban ghettos" emerge with a fair to excellent command of the English language succeed in life.

      So how is it exactly that oppression is holding these people back? Are there really droves of white men going around forcing these people to call every one of their peers "bro" or "niggah" or "homie" and thereby preventing them from entering the workforce in a meaningful way?

      If you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron.

      The implied ad hominem aside; didn't you read the part where I said I completed high school in a lower class area? Socio-economic progress to these people was installing a CD player in their $200 car, if they could afford a $200 car in some cases.

      Yes, I watched groups of people who preferred to smoke drugs, skip classes or become sports obsessed jocks and also groups of people who worked hard and avoided all that nonsense. Guess which group broke free from their poor socio-economic upbringing and guess which ones now serve hamburgers (or reside in jail)? Hint: Many of the aforementioned have served me various foods and beverages since commencement. I'm sure that means I'm oppressing them, right?

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      f you honestly think that your initial economic situation doesn't have any impact on educational level and success in life, you're a moron. And if you think your initial economic situation needs to dictate your educational level and success in life you're a self deluded moron.

      Case in point. I was raised by a single parent, my mother. She barely made enough to feed us, but she rode my ass to stay in school, the worst offence I could preform as a child was to slack off in school.

      And so I payed attention, I worked hard and I did was one goes to school to do. Learn. I did so well in fact I quickly found I needed to teach my self if I expected to keep learning because I was learning faster than public education was prepared to teach me.

      Notice what I did there? I, me. I decided that the system was not preforming the way I wanted it to, so I took it upon my self to insure my own future instead of relying on someone else to do it for me.

      I now make a sickeningly large amount of money compared to what my mother made as a child, I have a larger depth of knowledge than she does. And it thrills her because I've done well with my life. She did the best thing any parent can do for a child, and kept me learning.
    3. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but it probably means you're a self-serving, materialistic asshole that has no problem stepping over people to make money.

      Actually I've been slowed in my own career advancement because I take the time to impart my gained knowledge and wisdom on new employees rather than furthering myself, but that's really immaterial to your ad hominem approach so we'll move right along.

      Nothing personal, just my observation. Those who succeed aren't smarter, nor do they work *harder*.

      So success is nothing more than exploitation? Has nothing to do with knowledge or ability to work smart or hard? Interesting.

      It's always convenient to blame poverty on behavior. The problem is I hear you saying - "If you just sell out your soul, your ethnicity, your language, your culture, and everything that makes you an individual person, you too can succeed!"

      Did I say people had to sell out their soul or their ethnicity or language? Funny, but I don't recall making that claim. However there are certain things that make people "an individual person" that are simply barriers to success in the work force. Lack of personal hygiene can be a pretty big barrier. A person's chosen vernacular and the frequent use of profanity is a distinct barrier to entry in most business and retail sectors. Is that really a problem? Seriously? You mean I should be able to approach a client and ask them "Yo mo'fucker, what's up wit' choo today niggah?" Really? Amazing. I had no idea how deeply I was involved in this systematic persecution.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    4. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by ciggieposeur · · Score: 1

      And so I payed attention,

      Apparently you didn't pay enough attention: http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/payed.html .

    5. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I watched groups of people who preferred to smoke drugs, skip classes or become sports obsessed jocks and also groups of people who worked hard and avoided all that nonsense. Guess which group broke free from their poor socio-economic upbringing and guess which ones now serve hamburgers (or reside in jail)?

      The point is that if you were in a rich school, both groups would end up successful. Some of the worst druggies and sports addicts would end up running the country.

    6. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from a rich white family. I went to a high school where 94% of the students went immediately on to a college or university. About 80% of them had degrees 5 years later.

      I screwed up pretty bad my second year of university. It doesn't effect me today because my family was able to help me sallow the extra 20K cost my mistake caused. If my family was from a poorer background I wouldn't have been able to get that degree.

      If you are proof of social mobility. I am proof of social stability. The good float, the bad sink, and the medicore stay put.

      Did your lesser peers really not deserve the generous chance I had because of their birth?

    7. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Informative

      So how is it exactly that oppression is holding these people back? Are there really droves of white men going around forcing these people to call every one of their peers "bro" or "niggah" or "homie" and thereby preventing them from entering the workforce in a meaningful way? You are right, there is nothing holding anyone back in America but themselves. The problem is a lot of them have the perception that they can't succeed, because of who they are. Everyone around them has the same perception, and no one is there to help them break out of it.

      For an example, go down to Union Square in San Francisco sometime. You will see a bunch of rich white people, a bunch of rich Asian people, and a bunch of poor black people. Imagine if you were a black kid growing up in that neighborhood. What are you going to think?

      So on the one hand, the problem isn't that racism is holding people back, but on the other hand there IS a problem that needs to be solved.
      --
      Qxe4
    8. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Until two generations back, my family was made up of a bunch of illiterate subsistence farmers who could barely afford to eat. Can I use that as an excuse when I fuck up too?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 1

      You mean I should be able to approach a client and ask them "Yo mo'fucker, what's up wit' choo today niggah?" Really? Amazing. I had no idea how deeply I was involved in this systematic persecution. You're missing the point. Why is YOUR mode of speech the "accepted" one? I'm guessing you didn't grow up speaking like that -- rather, you grew up speaking something like how you might speak to your client. You may find the "black" mode of address deplorable, but is it any less effective than: "Well hello Charles, cheerio, and a lovely day to you sir"?

      Here's the point: your perspective is that of the modern, enlightened racist. OK, so some blacks you knew were or are able to adapt to society's rules. The privileged never had to. It's just one more hurdle to jump over. Here are some other ones:
      • The fact that most whites I know seem to be terrified of blacks in person
      • The fact that people are too afraid to confront you directly, lest they seem 'racist'
      • Every time you get a good grade, or a promotion, everyone around you thinks "it's only because he's black"
      • You have to tolerate "good-natured joshing" from white people like you who seem to think they "get it", but in fact, are clueless
      • Everyone around you thinking that YOUR cultural artifacts (art, music) are "rural" or "rustic" or "barbarian" -- when everything they seem to love is bland and contentless
      This list goes on and on. I wish you had the opportunity to be looked down upon for 20+ years, explicitly or implicitly, so you could see how deeply it affects the fabric of a person's self. People like you are the worst; you think that because people CAN rise up, that everyone should be able to. Well, guess what -- you could probably be a world-class doctor, or astronaut, or artist, or whatever it is you prefer here -- but I'm guessing you aren't. Very few are, because it's exceptionally difficult. When you're black, I guarantee you have to try harder, be better, and through it all, maintain a really thick shell; you just don't get the benefit of the doubt, because your "default" societal behavior is always "wrong".

      Get it now?
      --
      -----[0_o]-----
      We are not amused.
    10. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Lexi_the_linux_girl · · Score: 1

      Yes, Canada is different but enough people have brought up assumptions and have mentioned Canada to assume that Canada has the same problems as the US that it is completely valid for us Canadians to post and let you know, North of the border is not the same.

      And yes we have a very multicultural society, there are ghettos (Jane and Finch in Toronto, Parts of North Montreal), and poor neighbourhoods that are populated by immigrants, native reservations that are no more than shanty towns, as well as the staggering staggering poverty of east Vancouver.

      Although a large percentage of Black people I meet in Canada are newer immigrants from the Caribbean, and Africa, there is a long, and interesting black history up here too (Africaville, The Colored Corps, and The Underground Railroad).

      Canada too has a history of discrimination against Natives, Asians, Blacks, East Asians, Irish, Eastern Europeans, English in Quebec, French in Ontario, etc), at some time in history nearly every non-English/non-French group - but as time goes by, race relations are getting better and although far from perfect, compared to the media and experiences visiting the US, things seem better here.

      Maybe us Canadians are posting because we feel slighted when our culture is lumped in to the US culture.

    11. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Why is YOUR mode of speech the "accepted" one? I'm guessing you didn't grow up speaking like that -- rather, you grew up speaking something like how you might speak to your client. You may find the "black" mode of address deplorable, but is it any less effective than: "Well hello Charles, cheerio, and a lovely day to you sir"?

      Now I'm going to have to ask you to back up here. We were talking about urban ghetto slang, not "black" versus "white". We're talking about people who learn to use the preferred local dialect in order to fit into the business world, not learning to speak like a bad English (from England) stuffed-shirt comedy special.

      I personally know all sorts of people who've come from a very wide array of backgrounds and they've all learned to adapt to their goals. I'm sure we all have. I had to cut my hair and start wearing suits and ties to get where I am today. Marilyn Manson t-shirts and Doc Martins aren't exactly business atire. I also used to spit compulsively and chain smoke, much of my own dialog was made up of expletives. I was a social outcast, I was harassed by the police constantly so I developed a chip on my shoulder and hated authority. I changed, adapted, evolved, and now I feel I'm successful for it.

      A friend of mine was born in Canada but her father emigrated from India. She distinctly remembers when she was younger how many hours he spent in front of a mirror trying to speak more fluently. Specifically, among other nuances he couldn't pronounce the letter 'v'. After months of practise that stigma is removed.

      Another friend is black Jamaican. He speaks perfectly fluent Canadian English and his business continues to thrive to this day. Now, when he gets together with some of his countrymen (be it friends or family) his accent and rural dialect come flying back right out of left field, but when he's speaking with his customers, suppliers and employees you'd think he was born here. His biggest pet peeve? Black people sauntering into the store with their "Yo brother, hook a niggah up!" He informs them he's not their brother, he's a businessman, he'll treat them like a client but the colour of their skin does not entitle them to a bigger discount. If they don't like it they can leave. He's worked hard for everything he has and finds the idea of handouts utterly deplorable. He and his family sleep very comfortably at night.

      Another from Trinidad who learned very quickly that in the retail sector his accent was weighing him down. He started to learn to soften it when at work and his success went through the roof. When he's with his friends, on the other hand, he's practically back on the island.

      Here's the point: your perspective is that of the modern, enlightened racist.

      I take great offence to that. If that was your intention you've succeeded. FWIW though, you're completely wrong.

      OK, so some blacks you knew were or are able to adapt to society's rules. The privileged never had to.

      The privileged never had to adapt? You mean they spoke and dressed abrasively and never changed? Or could it be that the privileged were already living under the rules of our society and didn't have to change quite so drastically?

      Put this another way; if you moved to China or France, you refused to speak the local dialect and insisted on observing your own cultural nuances on great public display without regard for the local culture - how successful do you believe you'd be?

      It's just one more hurdle to jump over. Here are some other ones:

      • The fact that most whites I know seem to be terrified of blacks in person

      Then you know some introverted, uncultured white people.

      The fact that people are too afraid to confront you directly, lest they seem 'racist'

      This is why I want to remove the stigma of race. People are people and are treated equally until they give

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    12. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 1
      To your comments about some blacks being able to adapt and talk or act white -- you're still missing the point, there. Yes, some minorities have done it, and will continue to do it. Some people have become and can become pro athletes, but most of us never will. Yes, you had to cut your hair and stop swearing, but I bet your parents basically spoke in a "business acceptable" style -- and you had a good role model or two to emulate. I bet YOU never had to stand in front of a mirror practicing your English, did you?

      I take great offence to that. If that was your intention you've succeeded. FWIW though, you're completely wrong.

      I apologize that I have offended you, but I stand by my comment. Your argument is basically this: there are successful minorities, therefore being a minority is not an impediment to success. What a horribly fallacious and racist argument! Lance Armstrong was a successful athlete after surviving cancer, therefore cancer was not an impediment to his success. And, ironically, I think that argument holds more water than the one about minorities!

      Or could it be that the privileged were already living under the rules of our society and didn't have to change quite so drastically?[. . .] Put this another way; if you moved to China or France, you refused to speak the local dialect and insisted on observing your own cultural nuances on great public display without regard for the local culture - how successful do you believe you'd be?

      Yes, exactly -- you're already living under that society's general rules, so you have a distinct advantage. In your China/France scenario, you've successfully identified another instance of unworthy bias. However, it is (IMO) much more forgivable -- after all, you did move there of your own volition. But if you're BORN into a society that rejects the very fabric of your culture, and no other society is realistically a better fit, what are you to do? It's not a matter of "refusing to adapt" -- it's a matter of being forced to do that much work that your competitors don't have to.

      What if you were born with one hand, and wanted to be a computer programmer? Eventually, you work out a one-handed typing system, after working on it for countless hours. In the end, you're almost as fast as your peers. But you always know that, if you'd had 2 hands, you would be almost twice as fast as your peers. That's fair?

      Then you know some introverted, uncultured white people.

      That's funny, but doesn't begin to address my point. Regardless of whether people I know are uncultured, I would say 90+% of white Americans are basically the same. Whether that's RIGHT or not is immaterial -- if it's true, which it is, it has a detrimental effect on the lives of affected minorities.

      So end affirmative action and all other forms of biased hiring practises and enforce a purely merit-based system of hirings, promotions and bonuses.

      Or maybe bigots should realize that people have inherent disadvantages/advantages due to race and other characteristics. Also, perhaps those same bigots should realize that an "underqualified" (by white-dominated society's definition) minority could certainly develop into an effective member of society if given the appropriate opportunity to succeed. Whereas their acclimated status quo counterparts might have already achieved social acceptability, minorities are much more likely to have untapped potential; once a disadvantaged person "figures out the game", he or she has much more room to grow than likely competitors.

      I felt the exact same way as you until I actually studied the sociology and psychology of race and ethnicity for two years, focusing on inter-group conflict. If you actually examine your opportunities and those of your peers, you'll realize that white males DO have a lot of advantages, and our collective societal handling of people from different backgrounds is wildly unfair.

      --
      -----[0_o]-----
      We are not amused.
    13. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      To your comments about some blacks being able to adapt and talk or act white -- you're still missing the point, there. Yes, some minorities have done it, and will continue to do it. Some people have become and can become pro athletes, but most of us never will. Yes, you had to cut your hair and stop swearing, but I bet your parents basically spoke in a "business acceptable" style -- and you had a good role model or two to emulate. I bet YOU never had to stand in front of a mirror practicing your English, did you?

      No, I didn't have to practise to lose a trace of an accent but I did have to learn to adapt my speech patterns to be more acceptable to demonstrate professionalism. While it's not the same thing I'll grant you I'd like to remind you that we're talking about foreign born versus American born members of non-Caucasian descent. The people I'm referring to grew up in another country with no exposure to North American (Canadian, in all three cases) dialect and had to adapt themselves when they got here with all the cultural biases intact. The difference being they didn't pay attention to those biases and chose to adapt to fit into the business world at large.

      I know a lot of people both white and non-white who still live in urban areas in varying degrees of poverty or lower class levels and I can tell you there's a distinct difference in attitude of those who want to get out of their lot in life and those who want to stay true to what they are and stick it to the man. I'm not saying it's a cake walk or that they have every opportunity but at the same time I completely disagree with the fallacy that they're being systematically held back. I'm of the firm belief that the majority of what's holding them back is themselves and their own attitudes and pre-conceptions.

      I apologize that I have offended you, but I stand by my comment. Your argument is basically this: there are successful minorities, therefore being a minority is not an impediment to success.

      That's a rather drastic over simplification of my argument.

      But if you're BORN into a society that rejects the very fabric of your culture, and no other society is realistically a better fit, what are you to do? It's not a matter of "refusing to adapt" -- it's a matter of being forced to do that much work that your competitors don't have to.

      I'd argue with the notion that North American society "rejects the very fabric" of foreign culture. While some amount of xenophobia and a general level of ignorance of foreign culture is prevalent it's the same way with nearly every country out there with a liberal immigration policy in effect. But to state that an entire country systematically decries black culture is inflammatory at best and nonsense at worst.

      There may be greater difficulty in acceptance of other cultures in Canada and America because at the core of it we really don't have a culture of our own. We're really a mish mash of cultural elements from dozens of countries around the world.

      What if you were born with one hand, and wanted to be a computer programmer? Eventually, you work out a one-handed typing system, after working on it for countless hours. In the end, you're almost as fast as your peers. But you always know that, if you'd had 2 hands, you would be almost twice as fast as your peers. That's fair?

      If you were born with two hands the determination to be twice as good wouldn't exist and you'd be all the weaker for it in the end, am I right?

      Then you know some introverted, uncultured white people.

      That's funny, but doesn't begin to address my point. Regardless of whether people I know are uncultured, I would say 90+% of white Americans are basically the same. Whether that's RIGHT or not is immaterial -- if it's true, which it is, it has a detrimental effect on the lives of affected minorities.

      That's a pretty bold statement an

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    14. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Blkdeath · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. Why is YOUR mode of speech the "accepted" one?

      Sorry I missed this point earlier and I feel it's a large part of our discussion as a whole.

      "My" mode of speech is the accepted mode of speech because this is Canada and our primary language is English with our secondary language being French. In America the primary language is English (to a slight variant of ours, which is also a slight variant of England's English) and secondary language is Spanish.

      This is the language these nations were founded on and run on to this day. There are speech constructs and accepted forms of vernacular that are part of society's accepted norms and that's just how it is. In China the primary language is Mandarin (and other dialects), in France it's French, in Russia it's Russian, in the Phillipines it's Tagalog, etc. ad nauseum.

      The notion that some blacks were forcibly born here has been diluted over the decades to the point where I'd surmise only a small fraction of American blacks can actually be tied to former slaves. That point notwithstanding, they're still living in a nation whose official language is English which is taught in all public educational facilities and is the nationally accepted mode of communication. The lowest common denominator, if you will, that allows immigrants from different nations the ability to communicate meaningfully without learning a dozen languages.

      If a person, born and raised or immigrated and naturalised, doesn't want to communicate using the local dialect when in a business environment it's their fault they're being left behind. Freedom of speech laws and our nations' recognition of cultural freedom allows people to speak in their own languages in their homes and communities so they're not by any means being held back because of the way they speak.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    15. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I work at a school in what the city refers to as the 'inner city', the ghetto in effect... And try as we might popular culture and their relatives imply they will be nothings and we try to prove that wrong... Mostly we fail because a school isn't the place to really learn that your someone and can do anything you put your mind to if you just try... Why? Because they already don't want to try before we ever get them. I've seen first graders talk about how "school is whack, I'm just goin' to go to jail like my dad and live off ya fucking white ass the rest 'o my life!"

      It's not even racial... white, hispanic, black, even the few asian kids here... all feel they will amount to nothing and so there s no sense to try...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    16. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Go watch the movie "Freedom Writers." I'm not saying you're wrong, just saying you CAN make a difference if that's what you want to do.

      --
      Qxe4
    17. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Actually last year that movie was shown to the whole staff... But unlike fiction, real life is different and for ever kid we convince they are something, 6 more fail at life... The numbers just aren't good. We try, and try, and try... and most kids just tell us to leave them the fuck alone... That they don't 'need no education' and how they want to 'be in jail like my daddy is!'. You stare at this stuff long enough and you can't help but feel it's almost helpless...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    18. Re:Hint: you're CANADIAN. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The movie is real, or as accurate as any two hour movie can be. Her problem seems to be different than yours, though: her biggest problem was teaching the kids tolerance.

      That kid doesn't want to be in jail. He has no concept of what jail is, he just knows what people around him have said. Don't let him push you around psychologically, you KNOW he's better off out in the real world, you KNOW education is going to help them, and you KNOW it's what they want, even if they don't. You gotta show it to them, let them know what they want and show them that it's REALLY POSSIBLE. You know this is true, too.

      You might want to check out the Freedom Writers Teacher's Guide, it has some good tips, although it may not all be applicable to your situation.

      The situation is hard, but it's not helpless. Keep going! There are those of us who are on your side, rooting for your success!!

      --
      Qxe4
  43. White/Black/Whatever by lorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me or are all these "problems" only problems in areas where "white" is the dominant (or substitute "white" for "male" and compare it to female)? Just let everyone do whatever it is they do that they are good at and enjoy. Nothing gets better cause you use somekinda quota to get more people in from different groups just for the sake of diversity.

  44. Attitude, not money, is keeping people uneducated. by Ayavaron · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of financial aid available to poor people given on a needs-basis. Most of the people I know, myself included, are barely paying anything to go to college. Money isn't the barrier to education it once was.

    The barrier is that people still think that only rich people can go to college. I know scads of poor people in the local high school who don't think they could ever go to college. They come up with a lot of excuses, like how their parents never went to college and ignore the possibility.

    I doubt that race has anything to do with it. Attitudes of individual communities and families are keeping people from pursuing higher education. This is the problem that needs to be solved.

  45. White Guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    WHITE GUILT!! Don't buy in to it! We owe blacks nothing anymore, they leech off of hardworking people... 1 in 9 black youths is in jail, blacks are a MINORITY yet a MAJORITY of welfare recipients, they have scholarships *just for them*, and it's easier for them to get into college thanks to affirmative action... BUT WHITES SHOULD STILL FEEL GUILTY ABOUT ISSUES SUCH AS THIS !?

  46. MTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to know that the offices of MTV are full of African Americans, and in the best jobs too!

  47. Explanation in the summary by CptPicard · · Score: 1

    African-Americans play so much video games, that they never really amount to much and thus never end up in the video game industry. Simple causation. :)

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  48. Just curious by houghi · · Score: 1

    If three grandparents came from Sweden and one came from Kenia, is the person still called an African American?
    Seriously, think about it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Just curious by Reinsarn · · Score: 1

      If three grandparents came from Sweden and one came from Kenia, is the person still called an African American? Seriously, think about it. No, for those who apply such distinctions (typically those who live a century or more in the past) they would be called 'quadroon'. Look it up, it's fun. I like the sound of 'octoroon' better, however.

      In other news, why in the name of all that is good and holy is this article considered news? I'm sick of people making a spectacle of 'minorities in nontraditional roles', whether the minorities in question are a different sex or skin tone or sexual orientation. They're all people, and I respect all of them based on what's in their mind, damn it!
  49. here we go again and again by aztektum · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    An emotionally charged rant that solves nothing and makes your cause (if one can really extract what it is from your post) look cobbled together by an ignorant tool.

    If your best efforts to look far wiser than others merely end up being incomprehensible denigration of others, you would do yourself a favor and simply shut up.

    Does racism exist? Yes. So what, oh enlightened one, if you're not suggesting quotas, are you fucking suggesting? Assuming you even have one. If your goal was to simply spout off, please save it.

    And how the fuck did this get modded to 4 Insightful so far?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  50. Simple Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you don't have/want a job, you're gonna play a lot of video games. This sounds racist, but it isn't, there are a lack of job opportunities in low income areas with a heavy black population. Sell some drugs, steal from your neighbors, and you'll have enough money to buy a console and some games. But, why then would you not go to work in the video game industry? Why bother? It's too much work, too much school, and you'll have to move away from all of your best friends. It's all really a lot harder than it sounds, most people from low income areas don't want to pack up everything and set out on a dream, which is essentially what entering the video game industry is. It's a pretty silly argument, talking about lack of opportunities in the video game industry, it all stems back to lack of opportunities in elementary schools in low income ares.

    All of that being said, I would love to hear a story about a group of black men and women who had brilliant game ideas and started their OWN game development studio in a basement and went on to make millions. It will happen eventually, with these numbers of blacks playing games it statistically must happen, it's only a matter of time. I'm kind of excited now.

  51. Race in Denmark by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

    It might be the pinnacle of irony to state this in my post, but one of the principle stereotypes in the rest of Scandinavia about Danes is actually that they are racists.

    I don't know if you're Danish or not, but Denmark is currently having some serious issues with the recent phenomenon of immigration, and I seriously doubt a black Dane would get off so easily. It certainly isn't that way for Chinese and Middle-easterners' children. There's a significant number of politicians in Denmark whose main campaign issue is reducing the number of people allowed into the country.

    One of the effects of this anti-immigration movement is that there are significant number of Pakistani/Somali/etc men who send home for a wife, but cannot get them into the country. Instead, they keep them across the border in Sweden. The social services implications (domestic violence, public health insurance, visas, etc) has risen to the point of a diplomatic tussle between the two countries.

    1. Re:Race in Denmark by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      "There's a significant number of politicians in Denmark whose main campaign issue is reducing the number of people allowed into the country."

      why is this a bad thing? name me a country which has large immigration and DOESN'T have racial tensions? that would suggest to any sane person that multi-culture doesn't work.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  52. what? by Punto · · Score: 2, Funny

    now I'm supposed to know if the person who programmed some game is black or white? I honestly don't care, and I prefer to keep not caring.

    I wouldn't mind having more women around the office tho :p

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  53. so?? by mattkime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the vast majority of rappers are black, but the majority of rap fans are white.

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  54. African American? by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Either you are an American or you aren't. If you aren't, then go back where you came from.

    No 'qualifiers' allowed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:African American? by AlgorithMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes! and LEARN OUR LANGUAGE when you come to our country, damnit!
      Especially the indians!

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  55. African-Dane, maybe? by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    All we have to do to fix the ratio is either sell less Madden/GTA games or get more African-Danes to program them. Either way is fine.

  56. You've got a point... but by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but I know no less than 3 people with their pieces of paper (degrees from engineering, psychology and accounting) who are not WORKING to their potential. My engineer friend makes home pages, my psychology friend works retail and yard care, and my accounting friend manages a gas station.

    And that, my friends, makes me sad. Those people wasted their money (and they weren't poor enough or had enough gay fathers to get grants) and are paying off huge debts with 30k/year jobs (if that). If I made what I make now AND I had my piece of paper... I'd put a gun in my mouth so fast.

  57. Racism hasn't vanished by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    The reason you find skepticism in any industry for the capabilities of a colored person is because of the bang-up job the so-called 'civil rights leaders' have done yelling and screaming about how minorities cannot achieve anything without assistance.

    It is rather easy to forget about racism when you're white. We like to imagine that there are no racial biases in operation when we get a job or are accepted into a group, but white people, and white males in particular are constantly receiving the benefits of racial bias.

    Racism exists, whether we believe it does or not. There is no particular industry to blame, but we live in a society that still makes it more difficult for African-Americans to compete, and the effects of unequal treatment in the past don't just vanish overnight.

    As just one example, conduct even the most rudimentary research on housing policy in America and you'll find that the US government systematically denied African-Americans the opportunity to buy housing in "good" areas of major American cities (meaning white areas) after WW II, which led to lower property values for African-Americans. Even after the passage of the Fair Housing Act, it's been an uphill battle for African-Americans who want to move into high-value white areas.

    There are a wide variety of other indicators of racial bias in hiring decisions, pay, and so on. It doesn't sit well with white people who would like to pretend that racism has been conquered, and that we all operate on a level playing field, but racism is still with us. It's there staring you in the face if you care to see it.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Racism hasn't vanished by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

      Housing is a completely different subject, with its own set of problems. A big part of the reason African-Americans can't buy "housing in 'good' areas" in modern days has more to do with their average crap credit history(which is a fact), rather than racial discrimination.
      You should blame this on poor personal decisions, not society is racist.
      It is no one else's fault that you have bad credit, low education, and a low-paying job, specially when there are *dozens* of ways minorities can get good educations (good, not great).
      Of course, stating that fact will be considered by many to make me 'racist'. Never mind that it's the truth.

      Not everyone can go to a Princeton or a Harvard, but everyone can go to a community college. One of current the presidential candidates is an African-American college graduate who's product of a single-parent home, and his wife is also the perfect example of how hard work and dedication is proof that anyone, regardless of color can make it.

      There is still some racial bias, but my point is that there will always be racial bias as long so-called 'civil rights leaders' can profit from stirring up discontent and shift blame.
      After all, it's a lot easier to stomach someone saying "You're poor because the white man is keeping you down" rather than "You're poor because you don't put any effort in educating yourself and don't stop spending money on stupid shit like rims".

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
    2. Re:Racism hasn't vanished by dookiesan · · Score: 1

      Do you think that the culture needs to push education and intellectualism more? This is a problem in white American culture. A caucasian in public highschool would attest that learning is often ridiculed. The view from the outside is that an African American who focuses on studying will have it just as bad or worse.

      From my experience in highschool this lack of cultural respect for intelligence is a hopeless problem. It's a vicious cycle because the same people tormenting the bookworms are also inseminating all of the cheerleaders.

    3. Re:Racism hasn't vanished by daseinw · · Score: 1

      Civil rights leaders cause bias in the housing market?

      http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/31/news/mortgage_study/index.htm/[CNN.com]

      Let's not even address the inherent bias in your argument as you discuss who "you" can't blame. Why is it that whenever I listen to a conversation about black involving non-blacks, it always shifts to why "they" can't blame others because "they" are poor, uneducated, in jail, etc.

      Many of those "they" are playing by the rules, are educated, have gone to college, have careers, etc. Is it right that even when you play by the rules, you still run up against bias? And you're saying they should blame that on civil rights leaders?

      Let me ask you this? When Microsoft or other American companies offshore jobs and lobby for increased numbers of H1Bs, do you say "we should blame the people who want to keep those jobs in the US"? One thing has nothing whatsoever to do with the other. If you have a beef with civil rights leaders, then fine. But don't use that to explain away the bias that this country still doesn't want to deal with honestly.

    4. Re:Racism hasn't vanished by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, the link you posted does not quote any sources nor has a link to the report mentioned in the first paragraph.
      However, the The Center for Responsible Lending is not exactly an unbiased source of information, since several of its board members are leading members of the NAACP and other civil rights organizations so they have a vested interest in the outcome of this study.

      Of course, it's easier to just post this link rather than look at the actual study. Here, let me help you.
      The report quoted by the CNN article is here: http://www.responsiblelending.org/issues/mortgage/research/page.jsp?itemID=29371010

      In the report, there is an interesting statement in the executive summary:

      This analysis does not allow us to estimate precisely how much race and ethnicity increase the prices charged to borrowers. It is also beyond the scope of this paper to determine definitively why these disparities exist. However, we do posit several possible causes, including the considerable leeway mortgage originators have to impose charges beyond those justified by risk-based pricing.

      What that says is "We can't really state for a fact that race/ethnicity is why they can be charged higher rates, so we're going to make shit up and claim that the white man is keeping them down." But don't take my word for it. It's at the top of page 5 in the report.

      "Many of those "they" are playing by the rules, are educated, have gone to college, have careers, etc. Is it right that even when you play by the rules, you still run up against bias?"

      Where did you see that? Nowhere in the article says anything like what you're saying, so you're pulling stuff out of your ass.
      Nevermind that historically, minorities have worse financial track records, meaning they're a higher liability, therefore lenders have to take extra precautions when lending to them. Blame that on the idiots that have screwed up in the past.

      "And you're saying they should blame that on civil rights leaders?"

      You're mixing apples and oranges. My first comment to blame the so-called 'civil rights leaders' like Sharpton and Jackson was to the fact that they constantly argue that minorities cannot succeed without help, which means that those who do succeed are always going to be viewed as not having done so by their own merits and competence, but because they were 'given a pass'.
      This had nothing to do with the other comment about housing, which was my reply to a different poster all together. Reading comprehension will take you a long way.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  58. That's the point by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    Who gives a shit what whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, etc do. As long as we're not fucking each other over, who gives a shit.

    People *are* getting fucked over on the basis of race, so actually it does matter.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:That's the point by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      People *are* getting fucked over on the basis of race, so actually it does matter. I fail to see how trivial statistics such as this where the only thing being compared is the color of a persons skin matter. I agree that we should bring attention to racial discrimination so that the person(s) responsible for it can be dealt with accordingly, but this is far from resembling anything even remotely close to that.
    2. Re:That's the point by Infonaut · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how trivial statistics such as this where the only thing being compared is the color of a persons skin matter.

      It's not trivial if you're the one being discriminated against. Discrimination takes many forms, and is often unconscious. But the effects are cumulative. Pile "trivial statistics" on each other and after a while you'll see the pattern.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  59. What about Purple Stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is that made FROM purple people? Sunny D gave it such a bad reputation.

  60. Why do we keep making race an issue? by patternmatch · · Score: 1

    The only reason race keeps coming up as an issue in the US is because PEOPLE KEEP BRINGING IT UP. I don't care what percentage of whites play games vs. what percentage of blacks, and quite frankly I don't care what the distribution is among developers. Why should it matter anyway? I am white, and I play games that are designed and programmed primarily by Asians. So fucking what?

    1. Re:Why do we keep making race an issue? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      The only reason race keeps coming up as an issue in the US is because PEOPLE KEEP BRINGING IT UP.

      Ah, the Bill O'Reilly "I'm color-blind!" argument. Too bad that your theory doesn't hold water. The fact is we all live in a racist society and there's plenty of empirical evidence to prove it e.g. in the current home mortgage crisis a Black American was far more likely to get a worse loan package (points, ARMs, percentage) even with the exact same credit as a White American. I'm not saying that race is a catch-all excuse for underachieving, but pretending that it's not an issue when you KNOW that's not true is the reason race relations have stagnated for the last 30 years.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  61. Talk about catgorazations. by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

    Who ever wrote this story needs to stop putting people into boxes of color. It does nothing but make people feel seperate from eachother.

  62. Hmmmm by doginthewoods · · Score: 1

    OK. So let's ask a few questions: What do they mean by the stereotype of "White"? Do they mean anglos? Do they mean Caucasians? Italians? French? Yugoslavian? Irish? Portuguese? Danish? Did they do a study on the number of Indians who play games and the number of Indian game creators? How about Jewish? What I see here to begin with is the all too typical stereotyping of "whites". I have a light skin, but I am mostly Italian- does that make me white? In New Orleans, at the turn of the 20th century, Italians were lynched & slaughtered by so called "white" folks. And there were a lot of mixed race people there- called Creole. You want to use your race baiting- make sure you have your bait straight. what I see here is a report that is designed to pit the stereotype of Black against the stereotype of White. There is no "white".

    --
    Republican leadership = Idiocracy
  63. guess what? by kris.montpetit · · Score: 1

    nobody cares.

    If you want to talk about statistics about where black people are in society, I would say this has a lot to do with how many more black people fall below the poverty line or go to substandard schools. You could say that resultingly not many black people end up as game developers, but still this article is redundant IMO. It puts racial questions where they ought not to be.

  64. Of course not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever seen an "African-American's" reaction when whatever it is they want is running late? But when they're late, or not there, or don't do the work, it's no big deal...

    I post this anonymously because I don't want people thinking I'm a racist, I'm just pointing out the things that I've seen from nearly every "African-American" at my school.

  65. wow by Monoliath · · Score: 1

    I am beyond appalled that Slashdot.org had a such a bad news day, that this kind of story made it on here.

    You have GOT to be kidding me...this is an even more trivial digression than that kid who got his precious signed xbox 360 cover taken away when he sent in his xbox for repair.
     
    ...and just how in the hell can five black gaming industry professionals have any kind of 'general insight' on the opinion of African Americans as a whole?

    Who cares how many white, black, yellow, pink, purple or orange people are playing video games as compared to some other ethnicity...? Why does that fucking matter? This was the last website I expected to peddle this kind of establishment driven statistically segregating fundamentally trivial bullshit.

    What an incredibly racist and ignorant article, and again I am blown away that something this stupid, childish and utterly useless made it on a site that prides itself on information technology news. How in the HELL is this news for nerds?!

    You can call me what you'd like, but this is the last of it for me...slashdot has gone to shit, and this is the pinnacle of the bullshit pile.

    ArsTechnica has my eyes for tech news.

    Please, slashdot editors...get back to the steering wheel...quick.

  66. Re:who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  67. Movies by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to compare the state of things in the video game industry to the movie industry. These complaints are very familiar to anyone who followed action movies in the eighties. Robert Townsend's Hollywood Shuffle satirized the industry at a time where the bulk of roles for blacks were pimps, criminals or, at best, the gruff sergeant. The leads were always white. Times changed, of course, and no one is surprised when movies like "Serenity" can give nonstereotypical rolls to nonwhites or when Will Smith carries a movie. From what I can tell, the videogame industry quite simply hasn't advanced as much. It's still stuck in the bad old days with the street talkin' black man. It is a bit sad that the best the industry can do is have a black man in a supporting role in something like Halflife 2 (and that is remarkable in its uniqueness) yet the summer is full of movies starring Will Smith or Denzel Washington or Wesley Snipes or a Halle Barry or...

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Movies by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Funny, I always thought Gordon Freeman was black. It's never really mentioned, though - he's jus tthe protagonist.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  68. Here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only know a couple of African-Americans who study computer science, or any sort of science, at all. The lack of African-Americans in the game industry ties back to the lack of interest in the requisite education exhibited by many (but not all) African-Americans.

  69. And the correlation between the two is? by PipingSnail · · Score: 1

    yet only 2% of game developers are black.

    And the correlation between the two is? That's right there is no correlation and neither should there be an expected correlation.

    So black people play games predominantly written by whites, great, white people consume cocaine predominantly manufactured by Latinos and white people also consume heroine predominantly manufactured by people that get the raw ingredients from exceedingly poor farmers in Afghanistan. Should I be expecting most of Columbia to be crack addicts and most of Afghanistan to be Herion addicts? No, so why should I be concerned that there is a disparity between consumption and creation of video games? Jeez, the level of thinking here is *REALLY* poor.

    This is a story about nothing.

    Breaking news today a Martian arrived on Earth that can play Pacman really well. We fully expect an invasion of Martians that can play Defender, Mr Do's Castle and Robotron equally well.

  70. My token input by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1
    A few bullets nailed the issue from my perspective:
    • On possible parallels between the music and game industry: Getting into IT is expensive. You practically need access to hardware which throws up an economic barrier.
    • On stereotypes in games: Should be pretty obvious to everyone. The Black character is usually the guy lugging around the heavy machine gun or rocket launcher.
    • On teaching kids a path into the game industry: This is the most interesting point and why I almost didn't get into IT. I programmed for fun on C64s and Amiga 500s as a kid and it never occurred to my parents or me that you could make a career out of it. I came full circle back to IT after testing the waters in other fields.
    • On gender issues vs. race issues in the game industry: I've literally had White Americans laugh in disbelief when I told them what I did for a living. I've heard coworkers dropping N-bombs and making racist comments when they didn't know I was within earshot.

    Also, I think there's an osmosis issue. Women are just now fronting their first legitimate Presidential candidate 80 years after getting the vote. It takes time for people to push through barriers and trickle into career fields they previously had no access to.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  71. Re:those weird purple people by ynotds · · Score: 1

    Fifty years ago, purple people were the staple food of a visiting alien, so presumably they at least made a decent lunch.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  72. it is like in textile industry by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    Chinese are producing 99% of world textiles, yet they are only 1/5th of textile product users. Something should be done about this; perhaps rest of the people, e.g. Danish Afro-American programmers should be permanently naked?

    Who let this dumb article on top page of /. ?

  73. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeky white guys tend to be racist pricks who are so detached from the real world they don't even realize it. This is Slashdot, home of geeky white guys. Now sure, there are exceptions such as yourself, but the common belief among middle class, suburban whites is that African Americans aren't being mistreated in today's society. They've never been to a strait up ghetto school where opportunities don't exist - schools which are in poor neighborhoods that don't collect many taxes. Most people here assume that because this is America and quality public education was available for them, it's available for everyone.

  74. why by silentphate · · Score: 1

    can't we all just get along? There is no need for any race/ethnicity to be treated any differently than any other. We are all just people and should be treated as such.

  75. Really? by Zero_Independent · · Score: 0

    I have a hard time believing that niggers play more video games than whites. I mean, everybody I encounter on live is a redneck. Maybe niggers are playing older generation systems because they have no money?

  76. Reverse Integration by Smackintosh · · Score: 1

    The only 'obsession' Americans have in regards to classification of ethnicity is the resurgence of pride certain ethnic groups feel in regards to their heritage. Back in what I would term 'the good old days' of immigration (Ellis Island as gateway to America) everyone did what they could to fit in, and adapt to their new country. Today it seems, everyone does what they can to differentiate themselves to show how special they are relative to everyone else. This has gone way overboard, in my opinion.

    The classic example of this is the term 'African American' becoming more prominently used and preferred (due to politically correct thinking) in the United States. This choice of words is more acceptable the thinking goes, than simply using the term 'black'. I believe black people prefer to use this term as it somehow sounds better, and gives the sense of some special, unique classification, or entitlement. In contrast, even though I have a varied European background (half Slovakian, part German, French, and Scottish) I have no issue with being called 'white' and wouldn't expect anyone to call me 'Slovakian American'.

    I think it's silly.

  77. Less than 1% of Gangsta Rappers are white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less than 1% of Gangsta Rappers are white despite whites comprising the majority of the audience and buying most of the albums, so that's even more unequal and thus we should address it first.

    I, for one, eagerly await my fair share of thick black booty from rap video girls.

  78. Dots, not feathers by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's a stupid politically correct catch-phrase invented by whites too afraid to say the word "black" or "negroe" and who thought "coloured" was too passe (and overly generic). Or it could be a way for black people of African descent to distinguish themselves from black people of the Indian subcontinent, who have "black" skin but far less African features.
    1. Re:Dots, not feathers by apermal · · Score: 1

      That's a completely ignorant statement: 'Or it could be a way for black people of African descent to distinguish themselves from black people of the Indian subcontinent, who have "black" skin but far less African features.' If you've ever been to India or Pakistan (which constitute the Indian subcontinent) you'll note that no one in those countries are that dark or have features that would make one think they're as dark as so-called 'African-Americans'. In fact most of the population is white, with the remaining being wheatish. That hardly constitutes as 'black people'. Get your facts straight and don't generalise based on your ignorance.

    2. Re:Dots, not feathers by murr · · Score: 1

      Not true. Southern Indians tend to have darker skin than many, if not most African-Americans.

    3. Re:Dots, not feathers by vigmeister · · Score: 1

      Naah... We're distinguished from blacks by being called brownies (which is alright by me - it's better than Apu or towelhead)

      Cheers!
      --
      Vig

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  79. 'Black' seems to be preferred by shyberfoptik · · Score: 1

    Not a single black person I know has ever said "African-American." They say "black." They will actually laugh at you if you say "that African-American guy" instead of "that black guy."

  80. You obviously are not from the US. by shyberfoptik · · Score: 1

    There IS basically ZERO students loans programs in the US.
    Those taxpayer-funded government-mandated available-to-everyone student loans I've been using to pay for tuition the last five years must be imaginary. Same goes for all my strictly need-based financial aid.
  81. Carl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be very interested to hear what people think about Carl from The Simpsons with regard to this.

  82. oh god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I had the social skills most women and black folks seem to have, I probably wouldn't be a programmer


    You must be a horrible programmer.
  83. What about white rappers? by SooDesuNe · · Score: 1

    When is MTV going to address the lack of white rappers? Entertainment is often produced by one group of people, and consumed by another. How many rap/hip-hop CDs are purchased by white kids? It's tragic.

  84. In Other News... by r0bVious · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Interestingly, 99% of people who purchase gasoline received from Big Oil aren't as rich as the people who "provided" it. Aren't statistics fun!

  85. Mod Parent Up by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    I agree, although as a straight, caucasian man I would like to add that having friends who are being discriminated against tell you of their experiences can also make you more aware of it. I believe that's why talking about this stuff is important - because in my optimistic opinion, when most people are made aware of their prejudices and the effects they have on other living, breathing, individual people (as opposed to "black people" or "lesbians" in general), they will work to change their ways.

  86. It's a racist industry by gamer4Life · · Score: 1, Troll

    Not only that, but white male protagonists abound in almost all games. Blacks are significantly under-represented even though they play a significant percentage. There are many Asian people that play and program as well, and they are significantly under-represented in videogames.

    Are white people more racist that they can't play anything else other than a white man?

    Well going online only affirms the assumption that white people are more racist - not genetically of course, but we live in a society that accepts white people as the center of the world. Nothing in the world happens without a white man.

    (You can see this in movies and TV shows too - how many blacks/asians did you see in NYC in Seinfeld or Sex in the City?)

    1. Re:It's a racist industry by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      It's all the White Man's fault.

      Wow..... You've just discovered a huge conspiracy! Videogames are a part of Whitey's evil plan to keep Blacks poor, along with gold teeth, chrome-plated automobile parts, powerful stereo systems, and expensive jewelry. I assume you've already heard about the successful Communist plot to corrupt American Democracy by flouridating water, right?

      BTW, who you play as in a videogame doesn't make you a racist. How many white/asian/black gamers play black athletes in sports games? What about Grand Theft Auto? Mortal Kombat? Double Dragon? Would a black gamer be just as racist for playing a black athlete in a sports game? What about an asian playing an asian in Mortal Kombat?

      What do you suggest next? "Affirmative Action/Rebranded Racism" laws for the videogame industry? "Race Quotas"? A Jesse Jackson march? The "Race Card" has been played out. People aren't buying that excuse any more, and it's hurting the "issue" more than helping it. Obviously, it's a non-issue, since black gamers keep buying and playing those games.

      Oh, and you say "nothing in the world happens without a white man"? So I guess that Martin Luther King, Condolezza Rice, Harriet Tubman, Nelson Mandela, Tiger Woods, Jesse Owens, Ricky Henderson, Thurgood Marshall, Clarence Thomas, Hank Aaron, George Washington Carver, Oliver Brown, and Kofi Annan never existed? How did Barack Obama become a front-running Presidential candidate if he doesn't exist?

      Racist T.V. shows you say? How about Family Matters, Moesha, Sister Sister, Fat Albert, The George Cosby Show, The Black Kings Of Comedy, Sanford & Son, The Fresh Prince Of Bel Air (show about rich black people), Keenan & Kel, and BET? I don't hear you complaining about the racism of historically black colleges (almost all black student body), the NBA and NFL (There are far more black players than white ones), or the NAACP (putting black causes ahead of everything else). Is that kind of racism o.k. because they aren't about white people?

      Next time you decide to post some "The World Is Racist And All Against Blacks" drivel, take a page from Martin Luther King..... Think before you speak.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. And so it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet more white people watch football games than blacks.

    Why aren't there more white football players ?

  89. not too many blacks in coding at all by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Since 1995 I only have come across 1, 2, 3... actually 3 black guys only who are working as programmers. Not a single black woman programmer. I really wonder sometimes are there any black women programmers?

    Does anyone know?

    At the end it doesn't matter who programs the software though, it's either working or not working but who cares who wrote it?

    1. Re:not too many blacks in coding at all by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      I actually work on a four-person team with not one, but two black women programmers, not to mention that the head DBA for my sector is a black woman who's been programming since the 1970's.

      Quite a few black guys that are programmers too -- one .NET guy and a bunch of wizened COBOL guys that I can think of right off hand (it's pretty cool, it's like working with a bunch of Morgan Freeman's that can all code circles around me).

      I guess it really all depends on where you live (for me, it's the southern US).

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
  90. Talk about tenuous by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    Look at how they collected the data and how old the study is. Also, I don't and will never buy into the idea that every industry has to reflect the overall gender/age/racial breakdown of a country, state, city, whatever. Could the game industry use more diversity? Sure, but like any industry it's up to people that want to work in that business to step up and get jobs or create companies that reflect what they want to see in games.

  91. if youre thinkin of being my brother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how the summary says "African Americans" and "whites" instead of "blacks and whites" or "African Americans and Caucasians."

  92. Maybe they just don't like programming.... by Da_Scotch · · Score: 1

    I dont't know how many black guys are in IT at all, not only in gaming, but I guess there aren't that many. I suppose it's because they just don't like it and their brains are not wired for this. I know this sounds racist - but I think it is true - poverty and lack of education is no excuse - there are many young russians, for instance, who are very good programmers with a very poor background, so why blacks are not? Because they don't like it and prefere to play various sports, various video games and do other stuff.

    1. Re:Maybe they just don't like programming.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont't know how many black guys are in IT at all, not only in gaming, but I guess there aren't that many. I suppose it's because they just don't like it and their brains are not wired for this. I know this sounds racist - but I think it is true - poverty and lack of education is no excuse - there are many young russians, for instance, who are very good programmers with a very poor background, so why blacks are not? Because they don't like it and prefere to play various sports, various video games and do other stuff. You know, it's stupid, half thought through arguments like this which make my life 100 times more difficult than it should be. You've articulated what most non-black people think but never say. So when I'm at work, when I go for a job interview etc, it's always an up hill battle, trying to prove something that I shouldn't have to prove in the first place. For some people, it's so soul destroying that they've given up trying. They probably prefer to play video games all day long. Or something.
    2. Re:Maybe they just don't like programming.... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      The black population has the same problem that the Appalachian people have.

      Education is not a priority.

      Yes, there are plenty of people in both groups that truly care about education is it just that the percentage is smaller.

  93. people care by joshsnow · · Score: 1

    And yes, "African-American" is a downright stupid appellation. Can you call a black child born in Denmark "African-American"? Are you suggesting that black people (or people of any "race") behave uniformly regardless of which society they live in? Presumably, if a black child is born in Denmark, they wouldn't be American. Obviously, when classifing people of African extraction in the USA, it makes sense to call them African Americans. If this were a study of White Americans, or Latino Americans, no doubt it would have been labeled as such.
  94. Smoke, Drink, Drive Cars and play sports by FatherOfONe · · Score: 1

    So what percentage of the above do each race participate? Now take that list and throw it away because nobody cares.

    --
    The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    1. Re:Smoke, Drink, Drive Cars and play sports by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, in the USA almost everybody DOES care. Racism is getting worse rather than better, and paranoia about racism is making it worse as well. Every racial statistical difference is assumed to be a RACIST statistical difference. Nobody seems to be questioning this, and the marketing companies are promoting it as a way of subdividing the market and selling more.

      They shouldn't care. None of it matters. Everyone would be better off if they just got on with their lives and quit worrying about it all. HOWEVER, that's not the reality of 21st century America.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  95. Reaping the rewards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why were Somalis or Pakistanis allowed inside at the first place? There is no shortage of decent countries from which to import toilet cleaners, yet these Europeans have this weird fetish about importing muslims from Pakistan and Somalia in large batches.

  96. This proves by Opr33Opr33 · · Score: 1

    that one race can successfully program for another race.

  97. Big fucking deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love how this always comes up at least once to twice a year for a specific industry. The reason there are no X-group in Y-industry is that X-group is not studying/applying for Y-industry.

    Last I checked you needed a specific type of education for a specific type of field.

    Also just because someone does something as a hobby/past-time that DOES NOT MEAN THEY WANT TO DO IT FOR A LIVING.
    I play Dungeons and Dragons about 20 hours a month, but I do not want to work for Wizards of the Coast.

    And lastly how many people who filled out the survey actually listed their race? Also even better, about 50% of the population is female, yet 11% of people working in the game industry are women. Why isn't anyone complaining about that?

  98. Aren't we all humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What difference does it make if a developer is Asian, Caucasian, African...etc? We are all humans. This type of discussion is absurd in my opinion.

  99. Whut? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this study drawing in game developers who are not from the US, because if they are it's kind of silly, only, to draw in black gamers from the US.

  100. Why I'm Black, Not African American by ivex33 · · Score: 1

    It's time we descendants of slaves brought to the United States let go of the term "African American" and go back to calling ourselves Black - with a capital B. Modern America is home now to millions of immigrants who were born in Africa. Their cultures and identities are split between Africa and the United States. They have last names like Onwughalu and Senkofa. They speak languages like Wolof, Twi, Yoruba and Hausa, and speak English with an accent. They were raised on African cuisine, music, dance and dress styles, customs and family dynamics. Their children often speak or at least understand their parents' native language. Living descendants of slaves in America neither knew their African ancestors nor even have elder relatives who knew them. Most of us worship in Christian churches. Our cuisine is more southern U.S. than Senegalese. Starting with ragtime and jazz, we gave America intoxicating musical beats based on African conceptions of rhythm, but with melody and harmony based on Western traditions. Also, we speak English. Black Americans' home speech is largely based on local dialects of England and Ireland. Africa echoes in the dialect only as a whisper, in certain aspects of sound and melody. A working-class black man in Cincinnati has more in common with a working-class white man in Providence than with a Ghanaian. With the number of African immigrants in the U.S. nearly tripling since 1990, the use of "African American" is becoming increasingly strained. For example, Alan Keyes, the Republican Senate candidate in Illinois, has claimed that as a descendant of slaves, he is the "real" African American, compared with his Democratic rival, Barack Obama, who has an African father and white mother. And the reason Keyes and others are making arguments such as this is rather small, the idea being that "African American" should refer only to people with a history of subordination in this country - as if African immigrants such as Amadou Diallo, who was killed by police while reaching for his wallet, or Caribbean ones such as torture victim Abner Louima have found the U.S. to be the Land of Oz. We are not African to any meaningful extent, but we are not white either - and that is much of why Jesse Jackson's presentation of the term "African American" caught on so fast. It sets us apart from the mainstream. It carries an air of standing protest, a reminder that our ancestors were brought here against their will, that their descendants were treated like animals for centuries, and that we have come a long way since then. But we need a way of sounding those notes with a term that, first, makes some sense and, second, does not insult the actual African Americans taking their place in our country. And our name must also celebrate our history here, in the only place that will ever be our home. To term ourselves as part "African" reinforces a sad implication: that our history is basically slave ships, plantations, lynching, fire hoses in Birmingham, and then South Central, and that we need to look back to Mother Africa to feel good about ourselves. But what about the black business districts that thrived across the country after slavery was abolished? What about Frederick Douglass, Ida B. Wells, W.E.B. Du Bois, Gwendolyn Brooks, Richard Wright and Thurgood Marshall, none born in Africa and all deeply American people? And while we're on Marshall, what about the civil rights revolution, a moral awakening that we gave to ourselves and the nation. My roots trace back to working-class Black people - Americans, not foreigners - and I'm proud of it. I am John Hamilton McWhorter the Fifth. Four men with my name and appearance, doing their best in a segregated America, came before me. They and their dearest are the heritage that I can feel in my heart, and they knew the sidewalks of Philadelphia and Atlanta, not Sierra Leone. So, we will have a name for ourselves - and it should be Black. "Colored" and "Negro" had their good points but carry a whiff of Plessy vs. Ferguson and Bull Connor about them, so we will let them

  101. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the original article it says that African Americans spent more money and time than the average gamer. That does NOT equate to "African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites". Not to mention this is only measured on how much people are REPORTING they spend on video games... Besides, even if it did equate to "African Americans spend more money and time than the average white" that still may not impact the gaming community if only 2% of the gamer population is African American.

  102. Questionable figures... by BlueF · · Score: 1

    Blacks spend more money and time playing video games than whites

    Nielsen Entertainment also did a study on the demographics of video game players in 2005 and found that African Americans are spending more money to purchase games and more time to play them compared to your average gamer. Am I the only one who finds this highly unlikely, given population percentage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_American#cite_note-2?!?
  103. This can't be true, I cry BS by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    African Americans spend more money and time playing video games than whites...

    This is a bullshit statement. African Americans in the USA are only 9-12% of the population and half of them are in the very low-income bracket. In the target demographic (15-34 year old males), 5-10% of African Americans are in jail. They don't have Play Stations in their cells.

      Whites (including Spanish speakers) are 80% of the USA population. They are concentrated in the high income brackets. The highest percentage of video game media and equipment

      So how the hell could a population that is only 12% be spending more money in an area where the other 88% has more money to spend? Even if all the blacks were spending ALL their time and money they wouldn't be spending more money and time on video games than all the whites.

      The statement must mean that African Americans spend a higher percentage of individually disposable money and time playing video games than white people do. But it doesn't say that. It says African Americans spend more money ... This statement is totally transparently bullshit. So why is it a Slashdot headline?

  104. self-motivation ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can take a horse to water but you can't make him drink.

    Same thing with education. You can make it available but if they choose to not take full advantage of it then that is a decision, and we all must accept responsibility for our decisions.

    Bill Cosby is right.

  105. Re: Err... by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

    Err, there is more power and wealth to be had for the average programmer as a non-game programmer then as game programmer. The game industry is not a path to power or riches for most who work in it (sure that isn't to say there aren't some folks who do make it big, but they are the exception not the rule). From my own personal experience there simply are not a lot of folks of African decent in the software industry at large in the US and again from my own personal experience this goes back to college. If the percentage of degrees relevant to the game industry among degree holding Americans of African decent is lower then that of degree holding Americans of Europeans decent why does it even matter?

    --
    Software Inventor
  106. for whom is it difficult to get a degree? by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    the fact that most employers in said industry want a college degree?

    I suspect that in many cases one of the reasons they require it must be for limiting the social mobility of those who cannot afford one, ie blacks with no wealth.

  107. Haha.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blacks are only like 15% of the population and are represented about 50% of the time. There's always a black in TV commercials and he's always the smart one or the boss. There's an ongoing phenomenon now. No minority in a commercial will be ridiculed - It's always the white male. I have been tracking this for a while and it's been long and annoying research. I have been writing down every commercial I see for 1-2 hours of TV a night. 95% of the time if there is a minority in a commercial vs. a white male the minority will either be in a position of "power", as in the boss, or he or she will be the "smart" one - as in the person making the right choice by using the product the advertiser is marketing.

    There is a huge exaggeration of what the black population represents and who they are in the mix of the US population.

    Who gives a shit if they are 2% of the gaming industry? They are 80% of the sports industry and no one says a word. It's accepted and that's all there is to it. Blacks, or Afro-Americans, or African Americans, or whatever they want to be called need to be remembered for what they have done - not what was done to them. It's been a free-pass for too long. I didn't have slaves and I'm not racist, but I am constantly held accountable for something I never had a part in. It's simply an excuse for failure. You can blame rap music, or ghettos, or "bling bling", but until the black community solves its own problems they will always struggle.

    Remember Katrina? Ever see any pictures of white people? Ever even hear about white people? There were almost as many whites displaced as blacks. Who cares about the whites though.. It's all about the blacks.

    Get over it.

  108. No problem, I'll explain it to you... by Omega · · Score: 1

    As long as you have 'reverse discrimination' (which is what affirmative action effectively is), you cannot and should not complain that you're not evaluated on your own merits.

    Imagine you're running a marathon, and one group of people get a 300 year head start. Now we let the rest of the people start running and we try to call it a fair race? It's not enough that we're all running, the people who were held back need an opportunity to catch up.

    That's what affirmative action is. It's much harder to change economic classes than it is to stay where you are in them. Affirmative action is about letting people catch up so they can advance beyond their parents' social and economic class.

    And if you think your parents' socio-economic status has nothing to do with your own, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.
    1. Re:No problem, I'll explain it to you... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Imagine you're running a marathon, and one group of people get a 300 year head start. Now we let the rest of the people start running and we try to call it a fair race? It's not enough that we're all running, the people who were held back need an opportunity to catch up.

      That's a fine analogy, but what makes blacks special? You know another group that doesn't have the same head start as the leaders? The poor. Another group? The poorly educated. A third group? The fresh-off-the-boats. All those people are disadvantaged in comparison to the leading group. Why don't they get affirmative action?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    2. Re:No problem, I'll explain it to you... by Swift+Kick · · Score: 1

      Let me fix your analogy for you, because it is decidedly broken.

      Imagine you're running a marathon, and one group of people get a 300-year head start.
      At some point in time, things change, so you take all those people that weren't allowed to compete before, move them up so they're with the rest of the pack. You hire personal trainers and coaches to teach them best running practices.
      You give them extra energy drinks and powerbars, and provide breaks from the marathon only for them, so they can get used to the pace.
      Even though they now have several advantages to make them competitive, they decide that it's more interesting to running backwards. They also claim their sneakers and shorts are not of the right color, and the wind is blocking them. Every attempt to show them that everyone else is dealing with the same problems is met with them covering their ears while yelling "LA-LA-LA-LA-LA".


      That's what your analogy should really have been.

      "Affirmative action is about letting people catch up so they can advance beyond their parents' social and economic class."

      Explain to me why immigrant families face much bigger obstacles than other minorities, yet they thrive? The majority of them don't have a higher education, and will be lucky to have finished 12th grade. The parents often need their children to explain fairly basic things like bill statements, job and loan applications, etc.
      They also can't apply for the same types of loans or government assistance like natural-born citizens, because they're not entitled to them. They have to work extremely hard to make ends meet, sometimes working multiple jobs, yet a lot of them own their homes, have cars, save enough to send money back home, etc.
      Immigrants have to work ten times as hard as any natural-born US citizen to get the same things, yet somehow, affirmative action is needed for 'minorities' to catch up, "so they can advance beyond their parents' social and economic class."

      Right.

      --
      "We'll need 2000 crickets, 4 cans of Easy Cheese, and the fluid from 18 glowsticks for this plan to work...." - ph0n1c
  109. as someone already said, not enough white rappers! by Teriblows · · Score: 1

    blacks are over represented in sports and music and entertainment in general. i guess they should not exceed the 10% or so they are of the total population otherwise it smacks of unfairness and depriving others of opportunities.

  110. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, I hate how everything is placed on "white" guys. Dude, are you kidding me? Capcom is an Asian-based company, but this is about how white people don't let enough black people into the gaming industry.

    Alot of different people with different background buy video games, who cares what their skin color is or where they live.

    I always get a little frusterated when somebody thinks others are getting treated unfairly. I do not care what your skin color is. You want to change the gaming industry? Ok, show me what games you have been working on in order to do that. Oh wait, you haven't worked on any games? So then, why should I care?

    I have busted my "buns" to get a college degree, and yes, I grew up in a rough neighborhood polluted with drugs and poverty. What did I do, I got a college degree in Computer Science.

    Product of you environment so you can't go to college?!? Uh, obviously you did not read a single word that I just said.

    There are no handouts in life. Stop playing video games, and go to school and learn to make them, and then you can put out your game. If it is not your game, then be quiet. I don't listen to country music, but I also do not complain about the lack of black people in country music. If you think you are being stereotyped in San Andreas, then why would you continue to play it?

    For the Record, I am black and grew up in the heart of Chicago. When I do not say anything, people assume I am white. Why? I do not know.

    Do I think video games are being racist and stereotype people? No. Uh, zombies, hello?!? Let's not forget about Resident Evil: Code Veronica where I was getting slaughtered by white people. Oh wait, we can talk bad about white people all we want and not be racist. Stop that. I do not like when people think it is alright to talk bad about ANY other race, and think because they are called a "minority" that it is alright.

    You use RE5 as an example, remember, it is an Asainn-based developer, so go ahead and tell those guys they are racist, and not white people.