It's you property and it has a lot of value which you are not being compensated for, pure and simple. If they want your data bad enough they should be prepared to pay for it.
Which is how it's suppose to be. Pure fairy tales if you think companies are not profiting off of your data. It more than covers the cost of using the apps.
Only for simpletons that need things spelled out for them.
"You're free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film -- and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level -- but I don't want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he's missed the point."
Google doesn't sell data to anyone? Really? Tell me again how YouTube or Google Maps makes money. Tell me again who Google doesn't sift through your email if you have a gmail account.
The OP is 100% correct. Taking "normal" people, people who have not committed violent acts, DOES NOT tell you this procedure would stop someone who WOULD commit violent acts. Obviously there's a difference between someone who commits a violent act and someone who doesn't.
"Under Made in China 2025, unveiled by China’s State Council in 2015, China wants to catch up with rivals in sectors including robotics, aerospace, clean-energy cars and advanced basic materials. "
"The strategy is at the core of China’s efforts to move up the value chain and achieve Xi’s vision of turning the country into a global superpower by 2050. "
"Under the plan, Beijing wants Chinese suppliers to capture 70 percent of market share by 2025 for “basic core components and important basic materials” in strategic industries."
"Other targets endorsed by senior Chinese officials include ensuring 40 percent of smartphone chips are domestically made by 2025. "
"Following its customary stance, Symantec did not directly blame the Chinese government for the hack. It said the hackers launched their campaign from three computers on the mainland. In theory, those machines could have been compromised by someone elsewhere. "
Corporation don't care about hardware and certainly don't wait for generations. Corporations focus on cost. They swap servers and swap vendors on a regular basis. So if AMD has the product they need, they'll drop Intel.
"In a release, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said unlawful disclosure of classified intelligence “can pose a grave threat to our national security, potentially endangering the safety of all Americans.”
"William F. Sweeney Jr., head of the New York FBI office, said Schulte “utterly betrayed this nation and downright violated his victims. As an employee of the CIA, Schulte took an oath to protect this country, but he blatantly endangered it by the transmission of classified Information.”
Classified information on her personal email servers in violation of the Espionage Act (no children intent is not required).
And according to the recent FBI report, her servers were hacked and the classified information was accessed by a foreign entity.
Not too mention Clinton did not have approval from the State Department to use a personal server.
"Zenith measured media by how they are transmitted or distributed, such as broadcasts via TV signals and newspapers in print. Watching videos on the web through platforms like Netflix and YouTube, or reading a newspaper's website, counted as internet consumption."
"For the video codec community to innovate more quickly, and more accurately, automated video quality measurements that better reflect human perception should be utilized."
Yup because innovation is at a stand still and new technologies don't get created to solver an actual problem. Hey wait a tic, they do.
Hmmm, so what's your fucking problem again? Could it be you want adoption of your codec but your codec doesn't pas the standard testing suites. So the solution is not to improve your codec - that would be too much work - just re-write the tests to say the codec is just good enough. Problem solved.
Actually the article is a lot less interesting. It's about the lazy mans approach to video coding. Can't past video standards test. No problem. Base them on human perception. As long as people "believe" they are seeing HD the codec does not need to pass the test that says it delivers HD.
Combating fake news with Wikipedia ? Surely you jest....
You can fuck off about the free bullshit.
It's you property and it has a lot of value which you are not being compensated for, pure and simple. If they want your data bad enough they should be prepared to pay for it.
Ah the moron who buys the "it's free" nothing is free Virginia and you're getting shafted.
Which is how it's suppose to be. Pure fairy tales if you think companies are not profiting off of your data. It more than covers the cost of using the apps.
Only for simpletons that need things spelled out for them.
"You're free to speculate as you wish about the philosophical and allegorical meaning of the film -- and such speculation is one indication that it has succeeded in gripping the audience at a deep level -- but I don't want to spell out a verbal road map for 2001 that every viewer will feel obligated to pursue or else fear he's missed the point."
I believe the DNC is doing just that.
Google doesn't sell data to anyone? Really? Tell me again how YouTube or Google Maps makes money. Tell me again who Google doesn't sift through your email if you have a gmail account.
Moron....
It's not, see the journal abstract. http://www.jneurosci.org/conte...
The OP is 100% correct. Taking "normal" people, people who have not committed violent acts, DOES NOT tell you this procedure would stop someone who WOULD commit violent acts. Obviously there's a difference between someone who commits a violent act and someone who doesn't.
Read the Reuters article https://www.reuters.com/articl...
"Under Made in China 2025, unveiled by China’s State Council in 2015, China wants to catch up with rivals in sectors including robotics, aerospace, clean-energy cars and advanced basic materials. "
"The strategy is at the core of China’s efforts to move up the value chain and achieve Xi’s vision of turning the country into a global superpower by 2050. "
"Under the plan, Beijing wants Chinese suppliers to capture 70 percent of market share by 2025 for “basic core components and important basic materials” in strategic industries."
"Other targets endorsed by senior Chinese officials include ensuring 40 percent of smartphone chips are domestically made by 2025. "
If it quacks like a duck....
You're willing to blame the Russian government?
"Following its customary stance, Symantec did not directly blame the Chinese government for the hack. It said the hackers launched their campaign from three computers on the mainland. In theory, those machines could have been compromised by someone elsewhere. "
Corporation don't care about hardware and certainly don't wait for generations. Corporations focus on cost. They swap servers and swap vendors on a regular basis. So if AMD has the product they need, they'll drop Intel.
"In a release, U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman said unlawful disclosure of classified intelligence “can pose a grave threat to our national security, potentially endangering the safety of all Americans.”
"William F. Sweeney Jr., head of the New York FBI office, said Schulte “utterly betrayed this nation and downright violated his victims. As an employee of the CIA, Schulte took an oath to protect this country, but he blatantly endangered it by the transmission of classified Information.”
Classified information on her personal email servers in violation of the Espionage Act (no children intent is not required).
And according to the recent FBI report, her servers were hacked and the classified information was accessed by a foreign entity.
Not too mention Clinton did not have approval from the State Department to use a personal server.
And yet Hillary Clinton is the only one who violated federal law (the Espionage Act)....
Recent FBI report and admission that Trump's campaign was being monitored. https://www.nationalreview.com...
Obama:
Went from 2 to 7 wars.
Ran out of bombs.
Made Bush tax cuts permanent.
Pushed for the TPP.
Yeah that's pretty right wing.
Oh heaven forfend, I have to pay for something before I leave the store. Will the horror never end...
"Zenith measured media by how they are transmitted or distributed, such as broadcasts via TV signals and newspapers in print. Watching videos on the web through platforms like Netflix and YouTube, or reading a newspaper's website, counted as internet consumption."
So watching YouTube on TV counts as....
LMOL TV is broadcast....ok Potsy....
You mean there won't be a release schedule for new programming....who knew....
"For the video codec community to innovate more quickly, and more accurately, automated video quality measurements that better reflect human perception should be utilized."
Yup because innovation is at a stand still and new technologies don't get created to solver an actual problem. Hey wait a tic, they do.
Hmmm, so what's your fucking problem again? Could it be you want adoption of your codec but your codec doesn't pas the standard testing suites. So the solution is not to improve your codec - that would be too much work - just re-write the tests to say the codec is just good enough. Problem solved.
Moron.
Actually the article is a lot less interesting. It's about the lazy mans approach to video coding. Can't past video standards test. No problem. Base them on human perception. As long as people "believe" they are seeing HD the codec does not need to pass the test that says it delivers HD.
fucking twaddle.
And what exactly are you installing that you need Google to protect you.....
That's a fancy way of saying he's right....moron...
Seriously, just fuck off. Just fucking die already. None of this bullshit you are pulling was asked by anyone.
Why do you dick around with your users? Because you get an erection? Are your dicks that small that you need to jerk others around?
It's time for FTC to step in and break up Google. Sorry you fucked people over for too long. You got big and sloppy and provide NO VALUE to the user.
You've turned into Microsoft. People use you NOT because they prefer you, but because they're too lazy to use anything else.
I await the day of your demise.
Again, fuck off.