Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft is Working on Technology That Would Eliminate Cashiers and Checkout Lines From Stores, Says Report (reuters.com)

Microsoft is working on technology that would eliminate cashiers and checkout lines from stores, in a nascent challenge to Amazon.com's automated grocery shop, Reuters reported, citing six people familiar with the matter. From the report: The Redmond, Wash.-based software giant is developing systems that track what shoppers add to their carts, the people say. Microsoft has shown sample technology to retailers from around the world and has had talks with Walmart about a potential collaboration, three of the people said. Microsoft's technology aims to help retailers keep pace with Amazon Go, a highly automated store that opened to the public in Seattle in January. Amazon customers scan their smartphones at a turnstile to enter. Cameras and sensors identify what they remove from the shelves. When customers are finished shopping, they simply leave the store and Amazon bills their credit cards on file. Amazon Go, which will soon open in Chicago and San Francisco, has sent rivals scrambling to prepare for yet another disruption by the world's biggest online retailer. Some have tested programs where customers scan and bag each item as they shop, with mixed results.

253 comments

  1. And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Don't mind me, just walking in and out with nothing but physical money to pay for my goods.

    1. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe the stores will just refuse to accept cash? It's becoming more common.

    2. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash will be outlawed.

    3. Re: And cash is handled... how? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the stores will just refuse to accept cash? It's becoming more common.

      Well, that would not seem wise, to be voluntarily shutting yourself off from a large amount of potential business, just to not take cash.

      And hey, not everyone has a smartphone, you know?

      Not everyone has a credit card...

      I myself prefer to use cash, I take out my weekly amounts I plan to spend on normal expenses (food, etc)....and like to do this so that I have a very good idea on my spending for the week. Credit Cards abstract you from your money much like casino chips do and makes it easy to overspend or buy crap you really don't need.

      I have plenty of credit...I could use, but I also would rather buy with cash and not have my purchases associated with my identity as much as possible.

      I"m certainly not alone with wanting to use cash for one of any number of valid reasons, and I can't imagine a business wanting to bar itself from a large amount of potential revenue.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re: And cash is handled... how? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      About the smartphone part... it will probably require an application, so I guess they're going to shut out people with old, not-up-to-date smartphones too?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:And cash is handled... how? by Kulahan · · Score: 4, Informative

      I was curious about the legality of refusing all cash payments, so I did a little research.

      Apparently, so long as the policy is stated *before* any debts are incurred, any business may set any monetary policy it desires. That's why it's legal to say things like "no bills larger than $20" or whatever. The only time this isn't the case is if there's a state law in place that requires businesses to accept cash or something along those lines.

      The more you know, I guess

    6. Re: And cash is handled... how? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are a minority. And one banks and government would like to eradicate. There has been a concerted effort for the last 20 years if not longer to eliminate physical cash. If you search "war on cash" you'll find an abundance of articles over the years on it. There are numerous reasons for this. First, the government wants to know your every move and tracking your spending is one of the easiest ways to do this. They say it's to root out illicit activity but who's to say HOW they actually use it? Second, if you have physical cash you don't need a bank. You can transact directly with anyone without a bank getting a percentage of the transaction like they do when you use a credit/debit card. It's also why banks and governments are fighting blockchain currency tooth and nail as it is digital but it removes the two reasons they wanted to go digital in the first place.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    7. Re:And cash is handled... how? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Paying cash is perfectly doable in such a system. You have a bill acceptor in store that "refills" your account after you touch your smartphone or smart card. Same as a contactless transit card or even refill systems for pre-paid phone accounts.

      Since it refills the account and isn't a means of payment, it can be very simple -- it doesn't have to give change, just take 5's, 10's, and 20's.

    8. Re: And cash is handled... how? by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      so what if you dont plan on coming back again? bring a pocketful of excat change? oh no change is too hard so i guess it is better not to go in the first place

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it say something on our cash about how it is valid for all debts both public and private. I guess if I go into the store and get stuff and they don't take my completely valid cash, then the stuff is free then! Sound good to me!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    10. Re: And cash is handled... how? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      That might be one of the attractions of having such a bill acceptor (for stores) -- keeps customers coming back. Or just use a pre-paid debit card bought with cash linked to the account.

    11. Re:And cash is handled... how? by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      You can't pay in cash in the Amazon Go store. You can't even walk into the store unless you have an Amazon account.

    12. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit Cards abstract you from your money much like casino chips do and makes it easy to overspend or buy crap you really don't need.

      This.

    13. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy a Gift Card - oh wait.

    14. Re: And cash is handled... how? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You are a minority. And one banks and government would like to eradicate. There has been a concerted effort for the last 20 years if not longer to eliminate physical cash. If you search "war on cash" you'll find an abundance of articles over the years on it. There are numerous reasons for this. First, the government wants to know your every move and tracking your spending is one of the easiest ways to do this. They say it's to root out illicit activity but who's to say HOW they actually use it? Second, if you have physical cash you don't need a bank. You can transact directly with anyone without a bank getting a percentage of the transaction like they do when you use a credit/debit card. It's also why banks and governments are fighting blockchain currency tooth and nail as it is digital but it removes the two reasons they wanted to go digital in the first place.

      While I agree with you on why govt's would want this....which countries have gone this way in enough of a manner to show up on the radar?

      I've heard on /. about the Swiss being in this category and moving fast there, but where else...isn't this more of a EU thing?

      I've not seen this manifest in any meaningful way in the US wherever I've traveled.

      I've yet to encounter a non-cash business in meatspace.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Purchasing goods at a store isn't paying a debt - you are not paying for goods or services after delivery. If you are in a restaurant, the bill comes after the delivery of the goods/services so there is a debt. The restaurant can accept the cash or they can consider the debt paid if they don't. Notice how bars and restaurants still accept cash? This is part of the reason why.

    16. Re: And cash is handled... how? by houghi · · Score: 1

      The Swedish government is trying to have cash as an option. Too lazy to find the recent /. Story on my phone.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, pretty much everywhere, you pay at least a 1% premium for using cash anywhere that accepts cards unless they are offering you a specific discount. Things being as tight as they are, that 1% matters. Everyone's racing to the cards that get you cash back, if they can.

      It annoys me more than slightly that the media has not seemed to connect the cashback cards and excessive cc payment fees charged to merchants with reduced access to these kinds of cards for the nation's poor. You'd think someone would push for some laws to put a stop to this kind of keep-the-poor-out-of-it feedback loop by now. It's unfortunate.

    18. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of small mom and pop shops where I live in my small town either only take cash, or you have to pay an extra 1$ to use a card on your purchases to cover the card fees imposed on them for using the cards. Cash is the way to go in small town rural America still. Also going to the local apple orchard to buy some fresh produce, or going to a farmers market, cash is king.

    19. Re: And cash is handled... how? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You'd think someone would push for some laws to put a stop to this kind of keep-the-poor-out-of-it feedback loop by now.

      Hahahahahahaha. You must be new to the US. In the US, the corporations write the laws and pay the politicians to vote on them. Visa/MC and the banks get up to 3% of every single card use. That's at least a percentage point or two of the GDP. That's more money that I can imagine. Unless we get money out of politics, we'll be cashless soon.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    20. Re: And cash is handled... how? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      It's part of the globalist agenda so any place that wants a one world government/economy is on board. The first place I heard it was implemented was South Africa IINM. To spur the countries adoption of electronic cash One of the banks handed out cards to anyone who wanted one. Everyone wanted one because the first year's purchases would be forgiven at the end of the year! This was well over 20 years ago. Stronger economies are using a slowly introduce the idea until most people are desensitized to its implications approach. Once they reach critical mass they will simply force anyone not on board to get on board or go off the grid.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    21. Re: And cash is handled... how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a minority.

      Yes, minors generally do not have credit cards. What is your point?

      (Yes I know you didn't mean "minority" as in "someone who is under the age of adulthood", but I figured an age-based angle was better to argue since it eliminates all attempts at claiming a particular angle is by-choice.)

    22. Re: And cash is handled... how? by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I suspect they don't care. If you can make your goals without servicing particular segments of the economy why bother? Especially if not serving that sector saves you money.

      Not taking cash means not having to worry about robbery or keeping money in a safe. No night deposit, with the risk of getting robbed. And of course in this case not needing cashiers at all. No cash registers, receipt printers, or change. It also keeps certain segment of the population out of your store (though cheap, available pre-loaded credit cards do expand the number of people who can live without cash.)

    23. Re: And cash is handled... how? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Mall*Wart tends to cater to the same "segments" most likely to use good, old-fashioned, cold, hard cash, though.

    24. Re:And cash is handled... how? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "no bills larger than $20"? They are just opening themselves to me paying for my $100 grocery bill in pennies. Don't think I won't do it...

    25. Re:And cash is handled... how? by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they'd accept it?

    26. Re:And cash is handled... how? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Try another store somewhere else. Maybe you might even find someplace which accept paper checks.

      Were you talking about food stamps or cash? Weren't food stamps moved to using some sort of card now?

      I wonder if these stores will have payment systems in place to support food stamps.

    27. Re:And cash is handled... how? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I have 6,000 one krone pieces in a some jars. That's about about $800 US. I've been tempted to buy a computer using them

    28. Re:And cash is handled... how? by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      You'll only get one chance before a new policy is in place.

  2. Amazon Has A Pentant On This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And It Is Employeed At Its Whole Foods Brand Stores.

  3. Re:This already exists downtown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your editors are too STUPID and YOUNG to realize this. Fail, Miss Mash. Fail, Beau.

  4. Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by dryriver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know who Microsoft think they are. First the murky telemetry in Windows 10 that cannot be switched off. Then Microsoft Office becomes a cloud only tool. Next, Microsoft's CEO is pushing all sorts of "YOU OWN NOTHING" cloud crap - your games, apps, software all go cloud-only. And now I go to a bricks-and-mortar store and Microshaft of all companies tracks what I'm putting in my shopping cart? F you, Microsoft. Privacy invaders. Data thieves. Conscience free arm-twisters. Cleptomaniacs. I am not shopping at ANY store that has the Microsoft system in it.

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
    1. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by DogDude · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Microsoft is not in the business of data mining. Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, all ISP's, and all credit card companies are. You don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft is not in the business of data mining. Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, all ISP's, and all credit card companies are. You don't know what you're talking about.

      So all those ads they have on Bing are just served up at random? Pro-Tip: Everyone is data mining.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    3. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      BULLSHIT SHILL.

      Microsoft is being the most egregious non-opt-out-able data-miner.

      they have a monopoly the windows OS, and they steal your information from a product you are paying for -- no method to opt-out.

    4. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      You can still purchase Microsoft Office outright and not use any cloud features. I enjoyed your Haddock-like rant, though.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re: Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Order_66 · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is blatant surveillance at this point.

    6. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Good point. I forgot about Bing.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not in the business of data mining. Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, all ISP's, and all credit card companies are. You don't know what you're talking about.

      Oh, so all of the telemetry data Microsoft collects is just for fun?

      Given US corporations history of data mining, it takes a certain level of blind ignorance to assume Microsoft isn't doing exactly what every one of their competitors is doing, and for the same damn reason.

    8. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I will grant you Google, Amazon and Facebook because we've seen it in the past, but show me where and how Apple are doing data mining about the individual users?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    9. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by gtall · · Score: 1

      For the moment...

    10. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is in the business of data mining??? what are you smoking??

    11. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that they do, considering you need an Apple ID to use an Apple Phone and Apple Pay. All Apple Pay information is given to the credit card companies, too, so I would imagine they do some serious data mining.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    12. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Having experience with Microsoft products. It won't work well anyway. When I tell my PC to do something and it dose the opposite, (just happened this morning with an update I said to delay for an hour the proceeded to shut down all my work immediately for reboot) I know they have no clue about usability. When each window an a PC will have it's own keyboard layout. Because anybody in the world would want to type QWERTY when in notepad, but DVORAK while using the browser?! You can tell they don't use their own products and see how un-usable they actually are.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    13. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you did. You just ignored it to shill for Microsoft. Scumbag.

    14. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Solandri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I own my own domain so I can create my own email addresses. I assign every company I deal with its own forwarding email address. So for example, I sign up for Microsoft services using microsoft@mydomain.com. Banks, online shopping sites, topical forums requiring an email address, services like Roku and Plex, etc. - they each get their own email address. I'm at over 700 different email address now. 700+ different companies I've signed up for services with over 15 years. The vast majority of them adhere to their privacy policy promising not to sell my email address to marketers.

      The two notable exceptions are Microsoft and Adobe. I began receiving spam at both of the email addresses I'd assigned to them. The Adobe one began getting spam shortly after they were hacked, so I suspect they didn't sell me out (at least not deliberately). The Microsoft email however got several waves of spam, about 4-12 months apart, indicating it was continuously being sold. It's remained quiet the last few years, but after my past spam experience with them I've been assiduously avoiding signing up for anything with Microsoft (e.g. all my Win 10 accounts are local accounts).

      Make of that what you will.

    15. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about Windows 10 as well.

    16. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in your head Apple does it, and with no proof you put them at the same level as Google Amazon Facebook which those we know for a fact do data mining.

      You must be American, so I imagine you're a redneck who shoots at everything he sees with his many guns.

    17. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they will provide you with all your data they have you'll find its virtually nothing.

    18. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also forgot about Edge being hoisted onto users, dark patterns used to create a Microsoft account to login with, Edge browsing history and Cortana searches automatically uploaded to Microsoft by default that are then used to target ads.

      You forgot a lot.

    19. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bing? Crosby?

    20. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I don't know who Microsoft think they are.

      A company on the fast track to becoming one of the most valuable in the world?

    21. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is not in the business of data mining. Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple, all ISP's, and all credit card companies are. You don't know what you're talking about.

      So what you're saying is they have no incentive to protect the data they gather from other prying eyes?

    22. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's scary about this tech is that the usual approach that many of us have been using for years to achieve a modicum of privacy in our (physical) purchasing - always pay in cash, avoid all "loyalty" programs and never, ever give real information or show ID if asked - breaks down when the store starts combining face recognition, rfid tracking for goods and surveillance to work out what you've put in your cart, what you looked at, which aisles you went down, where your "dwell time" was longest etc etc.

      So what can you do? Avoid all supermarkets (and all shops as the tech filters down)? Aggregate your shopping with friends on a random basis to add noise to the data? Give up on privacy entirely and shop online?

    23. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      I don't know who Microsoft think they are.

      Uhh the entire software industry starting from videogame companies and phone making companies have been doing this for over 10 years now. Walled gardens started over 20 years ago with the rise of mmo's like everquest, ultima online and world of warcraft. As soon as corporations saw how ignorant the average gamer/computer user was there ultimate plan was to have a generation of people accepting of non ownership of games/software and that's exactly what we have with STEAM and the rise of onlin drm.

      I bet 9 times out of 10 most people complaining about privacy have a steam account or also were at once point subscribed to an mmo. As soon as everyone did that, companies were given the green light to do the rest. As soon as you paid for a piece of software you didn't own or control and was on companies servers, you gave up your right to any privacy in that very moment.

    24. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      You're so cute...

      Hey... did you ever buy one of those really cool mattress gun racks which let's you keep your AR-15 properly accessible next to where you sleep?

      BTW... you already shop at plenty of stores which are using Microsoft's systems to track your every movement. Dynamics 365 is a pretty hot product.

    25. Re:Microsoft Is NOT Getting My Shopping Data by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      I do the same thing. Dropbox and GoDaddy are my worst offenders. I realize DropBox was hacked, but I changed my GoDaddy account email contact twice now and I still get Spam on it.

  5. How about by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    How about solving problems that actually exist? We already have "self checkouts". Is that a major problem that needs addressing?

    1. Re:How about by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the average self checkout sucks. If you go to the Amazon Go store you will see how much better that experience is - you literally walk in, take something off a shelf, and walk out.

    2. Re:How about by DogDude · · Score: 1, Informative

      That only works if you're a good little Amazon and Google or Apple drone.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:How about by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      Self checkouts are just a normal checkout where they make the customer do all the scanning and bagging, and their verification system uses precise weights of the product, which is a pain in the ass and fails rather too often. They're more a cost-savings for the store than a convenience for the customers. That's not remotely the same thing as being able to walk right out of the store with purchases, which would drastically improve the shopping experience.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    4. Re:How about by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      The self-checkout lets me check the price of each item as I add it. The number of errors I catch is pretty high. I'm not looking forward to keeping a separate receipt on a calculator, comparing it to the insta-charge and then finding the one employee to complain.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    5. Re:How about by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well if you are assume adoption of a technology makes you some sort of shill, it does make it sound bad.
      They are trade off in nearly any technology. But normally we would agree the worse part of the shopping experience is having to wait in line to purchase it.

      You don't necessarily need to be fan of the company, to want technology to better manage your shopping experience.

      Most people don't care if it is Amazon Google Apple or Microsoft that is offering the positive experience, it is just the experience they want.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:How about by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I normally prefer using the self checkout for small orders. Mostly not having to wait as long in line, and if I don't feel like getting in an conversation.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:How about by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The thing is that it's more than a simple adoption of technology. Just using one of these companies' services, automatically engages an individual in their entire corporate machine. Get an iPhone or an Android phone, and right away, everything you do is tracked and sold. All you have to do is to turn the thing on, and all of your privacy is immediately gone. Shop with Amazon, and you get the same thing, while at the same time, contributing to one of the largest, far-reaching corporations the planet has ever seen, and contributing the downfall of who knows how many competing businesses.

      It's a lot to exchange for the sake of a little bit of convenience. The fact that "everybody is doing it" doesn't make it any better, functionally, or ethically.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:How about by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Oh heaven forfend, I have to pay for something before I leave the store. Will the horror never end...

    9. Re:How about by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      What will be worse is if they implement it as described. The "system" keeps track of what you put in your cart. So, you pick up an item, go look for something else, and while shopping decide you didn't want that first item after all. Will it accurately detect you removing it from the cart? Will it detect at all if you do as many people do when they change their minds -- simply put it on the nearest shelf, even if it was a clothing item and they are now in automotive?

      I don't owe anyone any money until I am ready to walk out the door. Anything that can charge me for picking something up to look at it is broken design.

    10. Re:How about by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      That's not remotely the same thing as being able to walk right out of the store with purchases, which would drastically improve the shopping experience.

      Until you get the bill, or rather, a one line charge on your credit card that contains no information about what you bought. The "shopping experience" might be great, but the "reconciling the bill against what you actually walked out the door with" will be hell.

    11. Re:How about by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      For me, checking accuracy of prices has suffered greatly from self-checkout. With a cashier I watch every single item as it's scanned and if it doesn't look right to me I can question it.

      With self-checkout I just go as fast as I can occasionally glancing up if an item should be on sale. It's very poor spot-checking. Often I find myself scanning my receipt as I walk out trying to figure out how I spent that much. And it's almost always because I bought one or two more expensive items that I don't usually purchase.

  6. Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure let's put more lower educated people out of work. Why not, heck WalMart has already eliminated half their human checkouts for self check. So why not just put them all out of work? Pretty soon we will have robots stocking shelves too.

    1. Re: Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over-educated morons came up with the idea. You can buy anything these days, even an MBA from Harvard like "strategery" Bush or a law degree from Yale like "I didn't know the email server was illegal" Clinton. You don't need brains, you don't even need to know what the meaning of the word "is" is.

    2. Re:Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better not be driving yourself in a modern automobile or you're putting buggy drivers out of work.
      You'd better not ever take an elevator as you're putting elevators out of work.
      You'd better not be buying your own milk/eggs at a store or you're putting the milk/egg delivery person out of work.
      You'd better not be using an icemaker in your home or you're putting the ice delivery person out of work.

      This is how technology works. If you don't like that, go live in a cave on your own, hunt your own food, make your own clothes.

      Otherwise, shutup and deal with the fact that progress has this as a side-effect.

    3. Re:Let's put more low educated people out of work by ole_timer · · Score: 2

      it's not Walmart's job to employ anyone...if you don't like their employment practices don't shop there. but be quiet already.

      --
      nothing to see here - move along
    4. Re: Let's put more low educated people out of work by Order_66 · · Score: 1

      They're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist, there's a big difference between progress and changing something and calling it modern just to line your wallet.

    5. Re: Let's put more low educated people out of work by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      The only thing you can't buy these days is the 11" MBA, Apple dropped it in 2016.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why not, heck WalMart has already eliminated half their human checkouts for self check.

      Yeah, to no avai. Most people avoid the self-checkout, so Walmart is still forced to assign cashiers to help those reluctant customers through them, plus one or two that just stand there to make sure they're not getting ripped by customers failing to scan their items. I can't really see that its helped Walmart save on labor that much.

    7. Re: Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every one of those listed was a problem that didn't exist. They were all solved in other ways that didn't need people replaced with technology. We did anyways.

      There are plenty of times where people have to stand and wait for very long periods of time in line due to 5 checkers in 26 lanes. That slows us all down, robbing of us time to spend on other areas.

      That might not mean anything to you, but it means plenty to others.

      Unless you're disabled, you can just take the stairs vs the elevator. You don't need ice. You don't need milk as an adult. You don't need a car.

    8. Re:Let's put more low educated people out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The walmart where I live has an area (separate from classic checkouts) where one lineup is served by with 6 cashiers operating in parallel.
      It's got to be the fastest arrangement of cashier-checkouts I've seen, the line is always moving, there isn't any feeling of a need to hop to another line.

  7. Credit Card Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add item to cart
    Remove item from card
    Re-Add item to cart
    System Crash

    99999 Cans Campbell soup @ 99.99
    -1 Box cereal @ 9.99
    33333.3333g grapes @ 9.99/kg

    Your total: $3849784.34

    Properly calculated by Intel, Verified by MSFT.

  8. Hooray... by CyberKender · · Score: 1

    One more way for Walmart to not pay employees...

    --
    CyberKender
    Apparently Appointed Lord Mayor of There
    1. Re:Hooray... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naturally I assume you're also super-concerned about all the poor buggy manufacturers put out of work by the advent of the automobile?

    2. Re:Hooray... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Because what we really want is a world where everybody's stuck in a horrific retail job because that's where they're needed.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  9. lol and also lol by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    So customer takes two items off the shelf together, scans one, and puts them in their bag. Super difficult to catch.

    Put a RFID tag with a UUID on every package that comes into the store. Sign customers in via various and/or appropriate methods, whether their phone or just an RFID sticker they can place on something else in their wallet. Scan customers aggressively on their way out, perhaps making them walk a circuitous path to enhance scan time and opportunity. Perform inventory scans frequently; since you can do them by just walking around, they can actually be done continually.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:lol and also lol by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      Sign customers in via various and/or appropriate methods

      So now I have to be validated just to enter the store?

    2. Re:lol and also lol by Kristoph · · Score: 1

      The customer does not 'scan' anything. There is a camera ( and in some cases a shelf sensor ) that understand who picked up what from where and automagically charge you for that item.

      The only practical way to cheat the system is by picking up a low cost item, picking up a high cost item, and returning the low cost item in place of the high cost item. Even then machine vision would ultimately solve this problem.

      RFID has never worked as a replacement because, as practical matter, when multiple individuals are existing a store at the same time it's hard to tell who has what.

    3. Re:lol and also lol by gtall · · Score: 1

      No, you'll just have an RFID implanted in one of the anterior lobes of your posterior. You need not do anything to be validated, it will all be handled for you. Oh, and don't get a suntan back there, it tends to make the RFID go a bit haywire and a red flag pops out just to let you know you have a problem.

    4. Re:lol and also lol by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      If it's going to let you just pick up items and leave the store then yes, it does need to know who you are to be able to bill you for the items you took.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    5. Re:lol and also lol by mikael · · Score: 1

      Still too expensive, even at $0.25 an RFID tag. Given that billions of items are going to be purchased and sold, that price for an RFID tag gets multiplied by a billion.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:lol and also lol by DogDude · · Score: 1

      That's true. With the retail race to the bottom, margins are slimmer than ever before in history, I'd imagine. $0.25 per item is much too expensive. You'd have to increase sales by quite a lot to see any savings from not having cashiers.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    7. Re:lol and also lol by mikael · · Score: 1

      Supermarkets in the UK already get their customers to operate as checkout clerks in the supermarkets. Get the trolley to the checkout area, pick out each item one by one, put it through the scanner, and place it on electronic scales which correlates the item barcode with the weight. You only get to process the next item once the current item has been processed successfully. For security, certain items still have to be audited by a member of staff. Razor blades are usually in plastic boxes with a security tag. Some items are age limited like alcohol and tobacco. Other restricted items that need security clearance include bottles of Mountain Dew.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:lol and also lol by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      So customer takes two items off the shelf together, scans one, and puts them in their bag. Super difficult to catch.

      Put a RFID tag with a UUID on every package that comes into the store. Sign customers in via various and/or appropriate methods, whether their phone or just an RFID sticker they can place on something else in their wallet. Scan customers aggressively on their way out, perhaps making them walk a circuitous path to enhance scan time and opportunity. Perform inventory scans frequently; since you can do them by just walking around, they can actually be done continually.

      I have shopped at a store that has a scanning app, where you scan each barcode and it records the item and price. When I am done I select checkout and it charges my debit card. On the way to, they scan the payment barcode from the app, double check my cart matches the receipt and out I go. It's a lot faster than waiting in line or self checkout.

      One side effect of such tech is it allows vendors to change prices dynamically based on buying trends, for example if you notice more water is sold on hot days or on Fridays you could bump the price a few cents.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    9. Re:lol and also lol by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Yup. We've got that in the US, too. Luckily, we can still choose to have a cashier do it at every grocery store I've ever been to.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    10. Re:lol and also lol by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Even more costly than the price of the RFID sticker is the labor to attach them to all the products. Until you get every manufacturer of the items you want to sell to add them at the beginning.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    11. Re:lol and also lol by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Until you get every manufacturer of the items you want to sell to add them at the beginning.

      Walmart has the chops to do that. If you want your product sold in a Walmart, you WILL do things the Walmart way. That includes changing your packaging because a 16 oz package of your product costs too much, so make it 13 oz for 10% lower price ... keep them prices rollin' back!

    12. Re:lol and also lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir must have worked with RFID. Attach cost is roughly $.10 to $.15 per item
      Remember, you have to attach the RFID tag and then program it and update the datebase accordingly. Takes a few seconds per item.

    13. Re:lol and also lol by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Why buy those premium $0.25 RFIDs? A quick look and you can get them for under $0.01 on Alibaba.

    14. Re:lol and also lol by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Yes, you get the manufacturer to attach them, as they also get used in the logistics train.

    15. Re:lol and also lol by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      You are thinking retail RFIDs, not bulk manufacture during product creation.

    16. Re:lol and also lol by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      In the UK, at least, the price would need to be marked before sale in some way, even if it was just a scanner telling you the price.

    17. Re: lol and also lol by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Right. But that isn't happening yet. Is it cost effective? Does it actually work? I read somewhere in this slashdot page about how pallets of shampoo block the signal. If you can't read every tag it is no good. Plus, if two people leave the store at the same time, you can't tell who has what.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    18. Re: lol and also lol by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Right. But that isn't happening yet. Is it cost effective? Does it actually work?

      If you poke around, you'll find some grocery products already have them, but it's only a small proportion at present. If the retailers demanded it, I expect it would happen. It's not without issues, though, but cost of adding them to products isn't a big concern. As noted, you can get 10000 RFIDs from Alibaba for $0.01 each. If it's built into the label of the product, it's likely to be even cheaper (and buried in the label is where I have spotted RFIDs in my shopping).

    19. Re:lol and also lol by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Yup. We've got that in the US, too. Luckily, we can still choose to have a cashier do it at every grocery store I've ever been to.

      My kids always badger me to use those self checkout lines. I tell them that if I wanted to scan and bag groceries, I'd get a job there and get paid for it. I ask them if they feel like volunteering to corral all the carts in the parking lot and stocking the shelves for free too.

  10. Spybook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is merely a Spy Apprentice. If you want to know the secrets of a true Spy Master, head over to Spybook.

  11. Greed doing what Greed does best. by geekmux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cashiers rank among the top jobs in the US by numbers employed. Is Microsoft also working on technology that will eliminate the problems they're planning on creating when they make millions of jobs obsolete? Not to mention the fact that a lot of consumer spending and business revenue depends on millions of people being employable.

    Once again, Greed is doing what Greed does best; doing whatever it takes to create revenue quickly without giving two shits about any long term impact.

    1. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Low hangiing jobs.

      If it's easy to automate or bypass, it will be automated or bypassed. That's how technology works. There will be both expected and unexpected consequences by any such change, but we won't know what the dominant trend is until it happens, and the dominant trend may be to abandon the idea for the near future.

      Fast-food kiosk ordering also had all the same "this will kill employment" panic, but it ended up having a (small) net increase in employees needed as reducing the bottleneck of cashiers allowed the companies to take orders fast enough to exceed their previous food-assembly capacity. Even the most kiosk-enthusiastic McDonalds I have seen still has at least one cashier and no steps have been made to automate the drive-through.

      Maybe this is a good idea, maybe it is a horrible idea. I would be quite surprised if it was suddenly implemented everywhere instead of slowly rolling out at some stores in some regions to test the effects.

    2. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by gtall · · Score: 1

      Yep, all those unemployed people can now be retrained as computer programmers...or something. They've merely been hiding their skills for this new opportunity.

    3. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we certainly shouldn't subsidize stupidity, since whenever you subsidize something, you just get more of it.

    4. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Bernie Sanders School of Economics already plans for this eventuality where a growing number of people are considered unemployable at any wage and there just aren't enough jobs around. Typically considered a Universal Basic Income or some recommend a Negative Income Tax.

      You must be thinking of the Conservative School of Economics where they just cover their ears, close their eyes and pretend the problem doesn't exist and just calls everyone lazy. Graduate from here and you can be one of the most fiscally irresponsible people around to call themselves fiscally responsible. And no level of hypocrisy will be too much for you to bear.

    5. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how everybody can agree that automation will reduce jobs, but nobody seems to realize how dirt-cheap it'll make the price of everything too. UBI will be unnecessary (which is good because the math doesn't check out anyway).

    6. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your only useful skill in life is pushing buttons at a register.. Then you're not overly useful to begin with and were always going to be put out of work.

    7. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Riceballsan · · Score: 1
      Why's Bernie Sanders the one you think is dumb for this... Sander's policies are 1. Raise minimum wage. If a job still needs to be done, the people being paid to do it need to be able to survive. People are still going to be replaced by machines even if we somehow got them to work for free. 2. Free college tuition. As these jobs are going away, we need to make sure these cashiers have some education if they want to actually move away from things. We have to get rid of the financial barrier towards having the option to get a decent job.

      those 2 things have kind of been centerpieces of bernie's campaign for ages. Longer term we are going to need to work towards something like UBI etc... but to my knowledge those are the best bandaid fixes I can see. Compared to the current model of "pay them crap... allow education to be out of the price range of anyone who doesn't have wealthy parents,

    8. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Seriously? You think the greed that's driving automation as quickly as possible is going to also drive down pricing to the consumer? Really? Have you not noticed how prices on nearly EVERYTHING goes up over time? No? Have you done any shopping in the past ten years?

      So much stupidity surrounding this topic. Good grief.

    9. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever thought about why higher education got to be so expensive in the first place? Hint: it's not from a *lack* of government intervention in the market!

    10. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Is Microsoft also working on technology that will eliminate the problems they're planning on creating when they make millions of jobs obsolete?

      Would that be like when we made millions of farm jobs obsolete by introducing tractors and combines and such? Or how about the jobs that were rendered obsolete when we replaced sailing ships with steamships? Or when airplanes replaced steamships as the way to cross the Atlantic/Pacific oceans?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why downvote this guy? It's true. You (metaphorically) don't keep jobs around *just because*. Anyone here who thinks otherwise does not understand economics. I hear so very many people who worship at the alter of *Scandinavian democratic socialism*. I *know* people who live there; some are actually in my family. It's not nearly as rosy as it's made out to be. Any government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take it away. And besides, people should not be waiting for government to do anything for them. This is not how the founders envisioned America. Men and women are supposed to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, not stick their paws out waiting for big daddy government. The last generation and current one are replete with people who have the entitlement syndrome. Wake up! Government owes you nothing except: protect your borders, ensure free trade, prevent monopoly. Full stop. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Stop playing the game. Go forge your own path. Don't go the overly expensive college and pay $20k semester just so some college asshat admins can live in high cotton. Do learn a skill like welding, plumbing, electrical and make your own way. All of those fields pay more than IT. I know welders here in Texas that do seasonal work in Alaska for 4 months and make $90k doing so. They sit on their ass the remainder of the year. I know plumbers who make between $1500-2500 in a single day (average gig $2-300). I know electricians who average $100k and they are working M-F, never nights, never weekends, no on-call BS, nothing. These gigs cannot be outsourced to Turdistan. Is the work physical? Why, yes, yes it is. Physical work means you will live longer. You won't be sitting in an office stuffing your face full of donuts while drinking some feminine latte.

      I would far rather be the captain of my own ship and decide my own fate. Self-employed people are generally happier, more stable mentally and physically, and while there is real work involved, you make your own hours, work at your own pace, all while doing your best at whatever you do. You make it on your own.

    12. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, automation will reduce costs for the manufacturer but they will not necessarily reduce prices for purchasers. The manufacturer will pocket as much of the difference they possibly can. Prices are not set by costs of manufacturing, they are set by how much the buyer is willing to pay.

    13. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free college tuition

      Most jobs can be done without a college degree, and many people aren't suited to completing one as it is. One of the huge problems that has developed is this idea that a college degree is now the modern equivalent of the high school diploma.

    14. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by chispito · · Score: 1

      Cashiers rank among the top jobs in the US by numbers employed. Is Microsoft also working on technology that will eliminate the problems they're planning on creating when they make millions of jobs obsolete?

      I don't know, did Amazon work on those problems? You never shop online, right?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    15. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by labnet · · Score: 2

      There was an interesting Jordan Peterson podcast recently where says the US military has determined if your IQ is below 83, you cannot add any value to the military. This turns out to be 10-15% of the population.
      So while automation is great and all, how are we going to keep dumb people gainfully productive in society. Its a difficult problem.

      --
      46137
    16. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Well we certainly shouldn't subsidize stupidity, since whenever you subsidize something, you just get more of it.

      You were born with a certain level of mental capacity. That capability is at a level compatible with society, hence you succeed and survive.

      There are many on this planet who were born with a mental capacity that is not very compatible with any level of society. When you say we shouldn't "subsidize stupidity", I hope you're willing to support the congressional candidate who will properly represent your fuck-em-let-em-die social/welfare policy for the 1 in 10 humans affected by it.

    17. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      AFAIC there shouldn't be any income or wealth taxes and any form of forced redistribution by any form of a collective at all. I am against government as a general concept, so supporting a congressional candidate to reduce the government is not just futile, it would also be hypocritical. However if I find a candidate like that I would still support him or her of-course.

    18. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by rkordmaa · · Score: 1

      Pro-tip, when you find yourself in a obsolete job, get out while the getting is good. Progress doesn't backtrack, if a job becomes unnecessary it will go the way of the dodo and there is nothing anyone can or will do about it.

    19. Re:Greed doing what Greed does best. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's idiotic. If we abolished government, it would immediately be replaced by a bunch of feuding warlords trying to accumulate personal dictatorial power. Your choices become a) slave away for the nearest warlord or b) a blindfold and a cigarette.

  12. Rich companies should be job CREATORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the whole "we rich companies are job creators" meme. Microsoft has billions in the bank. It should be giving people jobs not trying to take them away. I hope any Micromarts that pop up get vandalized.

    1. Re:Rich companies should be job CREATORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the whole "we rich companies are job creators" meme. Microsoft has billions in the bank. It should be giving people jobs not trying to take them away. I hope any Micromarts that pop up get vandalized.

      We can't even get US megacorps to pay their fair share of taxes. Not sure why you think they're going to ever agree to your approach of forced wealth distribution.

    2. Re:Rich companies should be job CREATORS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not being mean to you when I say you have no clue what you are saying. No one owes YOU or anyone else anything. YOU are the captain of your own fate. Stop sticking your hands out in expectation. Do something.

      I have friends who own electrical, plumbing, and welding companies, all small companies. The electrician employs about 8 guys and 2 gals. He makes about $100k clear for himself every year. He built this business. He employees others. He has created jobs. You could do the same.

      My plumbing buddy makes between $1500-2500 day on his own, not mentioning the 4 or 5 guys that work for him that do the same. He gives them 60% of what they make. He built this business. He employs others. He has created jobs. You could do the same.

      My welding buddy welds pipes for the oil companies up in Alaska. He works 4-5 months a year (seasonal) in Alaska's warmer months. He made $90k already this year. He is a company of one. A solo contractor. He hunts and fishes and sits around the house for the rest of the year. You could do the same.

      Be the captain of your own ship. No one owes you anything.

  13. I pay with cash by DogDude · · Score: 3, Informative

    I pay for things with cash. If a business doesn't take cash, they don't get my business.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:I pay with cash by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I pay for things with Canadian Tire money. Let's just say, there's not a lot of places that get my business.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:I pay with cash by michiganbob · · Score: 1

      I like how this comment immediately gets voted +5 Informative. Clearly there are enough people on /. that care about your spending habits.

    3. Re:I pay with cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, walk in, accidentally slip and knock a few bottles off a shelf, apologize profusely, walk out. Cost the "cashless" business some doubt.

    4. Re: I pay with cash by houghi · · Score: 1

      I pay with card.I live in Belgium and the Credit Card company can see where you bought it, but not what amd they are not allowed tp use it for marketing. Not even the fact of you bought online or at a store.

      I do not use a store card.

      The CC company is allowed to use it for security so they can deetect fraude and blick your card if your pattern suddenly changes. But no "You bought a lot of porn online, why not buy some tissues, as you seem to be out of them." messages.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:I pay with cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so. How many tons of soylent green is Microsoft ready to prepare in the process?

      Because you paying cash to a machine does not solve the problem of all the displaced cashiers. If Microsoft introduces a technology to get rid if cashiers, they better follow though completely, or be prepared t pay basic income to every person who lost their job because of their "invention".

      All those tech companies should follow though completely when they "get rid of" of some or another thing or profession, not just make it SEP.

      Capcha": mitigate

    6. Re:I pay with cash by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they are hurting as a result.

    7. Re:I pay with cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon customers scan their smartphones at a turnstile to enter.

      I will never own a cell phone. I actually enjoy freedom when away from a computer.

    8. Re:I pay with cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the opposite, I never carry cash. If I can't pay by card they don't get my business.

  14. Re:Apple already tried/did this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have had it in the UK for at least a decade. A supermarket called Waitrose allows you to take a hand scanner and scan your stuff as you put it in your trolley. They are still doing it so the fraud must be at an acceptable level, as with self-service checkouts.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Not shopping at any store with MS? by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    "I am not shopping at ANY store that has the Microsoft system in it"

    I hate to break the bad news to you mate, but you won't be shopping anywhere then. 99.9% of point of sale front end systems (known as tills to non geeks) are microsoft windows based and have been for decades. Before that it was DOS with the occasional OS/2 based system. The backend could be linux or something else non windows, but tills almost exclusively run Windows.

    1. Re:Not shopping at any store with MS? by ideadman · · Score: 1

      "I am not shopping at ANY store that has the Microsoft system in it"

      I hate to break the bad news to you mate, but you won't be shopping anywhere then. 99.9% of point of sale front end systems (known as tills to non geeks) are microsoft windows based and have been for decades. Before that it was DOS with the occasional OS/2 based system. The backend could be linux or something else non windows, but tills almost exclusively run Windows.

      That's not really true, there are TONS of POS's that don't run MS systems at all. That includes every standalone portable POS system which there are a great many. Majority of small business don't use the large bloated POS systems you are referring to.

    2. Re:Not shopping at any store with MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as you pay cash and avoid loyalty cards this is immaterial... for now.

    3. Re:Not shopping at any store with MS? by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      True story...

      I was at Red Robin and the power went out for about 60 seconds during the busiest part of the dinner rush. I was sitting at the bar waiting on a table. When power was restored the computers rebooted into some "Aloha" software from NCR under Windows 7. I left after 30 minutes because the computers still had not recovered and they couldn't take any orders, couldn't cash anyone out and couldn't seat anyone (since their seating reservation software was down and they had no idea who was next). 60 seconds of power failure and apparently they didn't even have a simple UPS for their critical systems. I suppose the table management data was totally lost since I never got my "table is ready" text message.

    4. Re:Not shopping at any store with MS? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      The smaller tills are just calculators on steroids and probably don't run much of an OS at all.

  16. YAY! FREE STUFF! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    This is Microsoft talking about, so look forward to randomly not being charged for your purchases up until about version 3.
    Unfortunately, you'll also sometimes be double-charged for things, too.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:YAY! FREE STUFF! by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      And don't forget all the problems that will occur if you dare put something blue in your shopping cart.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:YAY! FREE STUFF! by gtall · · Score: 1

      And periodically your shopping history will get exported to those nice lads from Nigeria along with your credit credentials. It's nice that they'll have it all in one package and not have to scour the internet for more details. Hell, MS ought to put a price on the service, no sense in providing it for free.

    3. Re:YAY! FREE STUFF! by Kulahan · · Score: 1

      This is Microsoft talking about, so look forward to randomly not being charged for your purchases up until about version 3. Unfortunately, you'll also sometimes be double-charged for things, too.

      I will return to resolve one of these problems.

    4. Re:YAY! FREE STUFF! by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      I can remember a long time ago shopping at a store where there were just cards instead of products. One would take the cards to the checkout and pay for those products. Then the products would appear on a conveyor belt and be put if bags for the customer. Walmart now has a pickup place where one can preorder items and someone will shop for you and you just have to pick them up and pay for them. I think this will lead to a virtual store where everyone will shop online either using a phone or computer and a location at the store where one could use a store owned computer. In any case, one would not enter the store where the merchandise was located. If the merchandise was picked up by robots than the merchandise could be stacked to the ceiling and the isle could be made very narrow. I would think they could store all of the merchandise in less than half the space now needed and if a lot of people shop elsewhere and just pick up their items than they could get by with a lot smaller parking lot too. I would look forward to having stores with about a third of their space and more products and a more convenient way of shopping.

    5. Re:YAY! FREE STUFF! by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      I think this will lead to a virtual store where everyone will shop online either using a phone or computer and a location at the store where one could use a store owned computer.

      People can do that already. Most of us don't want to. Browsing actual items is a lot more fun than ordering off a screen, especially for food, especially if you want to be sure you're not getting certain things near their expiration dates.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  17. idiots doing what idiots do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cashiers rank among the top jobs in the US by numbers employed.

    when will they do something about that goddamned water so it doesn't run downhill all the time

    you are just bitching, ignorant fool

    1. Re:idiots doing what idiots do best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, such a well-reasoned and evidenced reply! Do you have a newsletter?

    2. Re:idiots doing what idiots do best by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Cashiers rank among the top jobs in the US by numbers employed.

      when will they do something about that goddamned water so it doesn't run downhill all the time

      you are just bitching, ignorant fool

      There's not a damn thing you can really do to prevent water from running downhill, so your analogy is stupid and irrelevant. There is something that can be done to ready ourselves for a considerable shift in human employment. It's called proper planning. And you can bet your ass Greed will bypass any step that gets in the way of making money quickly.

      And once again, people should learn from history. We've gone through several revolutions before. What everyone conveniently forgets is none of them were painless and easy transitions for those employed in industries made obsolete. People struggled. Many died. The ignorant fool is the one who fails to learn from this. Not everyone is cut out for higher education or even retraining, and automation and AI are also targeting educated jobs, so the old "go get an education" fallback is also become obsolete, which is the main difference with this revolution.

  18. Sounds like the loser's club had a meeting by swb · · Score: 0

    Desperate Microsoft who sees Cortana being ignored and Azure not attracting cloud business in talks with Wal Mart who sees Amazon eroding their market and leaving them mostly as the butt of jokes as the place where the strange dregs of society shop.

    I'd like to see the negotiation between them. Microsoft enforcing ridiculous licensing and Azure rates, Wal Mart tell them the new deal is half of whatever Microsoft wants to charge and half-off again next year.

    1. Re:Sounds like the loser's club had a meeting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azure not attracting cloud business? Azure hosts more Linux instances alone than almost anyone else after AWS. They just bought GitHub. They have their hands in about every pie out there. Their cloud business is making them record profits. They exceed expectations every quarter the last several years. Why? Azure and Office 365. Everything is now about SaaS and PaaS. Love them or hate them (I'm ambivalent), Microsoft is making tons of money. They were recently valued at more money than Alphabet. Only Apple is bigger. Microsoft is doing what IBM did, but bigger in every way: they are becoming a services company. This, in light of "cloud" computing, is the right choice.

      I've been in IT now for exactly 20 years. Companies are happily moving themselves to the cloud to save money. Think about it this way, for better or worse... If you can avoid hiring 20 additional workers at $50k a year ($1M), the licensing fees on Azure are a pittance in comparison. Love or hate the cloud, but it is changing the IT landscape for better or worse. I'm ambivalent about this because I plan on leaving IT and going into the trades (welding/plumbing/electrical) and adding the edge of my IT skills to create a unique approach. I want to be the captain of my own ship, not at the whims of losing my job to the cloud. You cannot outsource the trades to Turdistan. IT as we know it will have fewer and fewer jobs over the next 10 years. Even coding jobs are on the chopping block, as AI is already coding better and faster than humans. All of these boot camps @ $20k for 10 weeks are just low-hanging fruit jobs. I know guys that did this and they are always asking why they did it. They are given the janitorial coding jobs, the worst jobs in coding, which is maintaining someone else's code. I know, I've done it and it sucks. Be the captain of your own ship.

    2. Re:Sounds like the loser's club had a meeting by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      To be able to renegotiate that sort of deal, Walmart would need to be able to walk away. This would be very difficult once invested in a particular technology. If you go 'big bang' and move away, the risk of failure and loss of revenue is too great. Trialing other technologies means adding complexity and cost in the medium term. Designing things to be platform agnostic is a large upfront cost, even assuming the technology is sufficiently well-developed to create something that is platform agnostic. So it's not as simple as you suggest for a company to renegotiate, which is why we see a lot of expensive legacy items in production.

    3. Re:Sounds like the loser's club had a meeting by swb · · Score: 1

      I've been in IT for 26 years, currently at a consulting outfit.

      Most established companies are not happily moving themselves into the cloud "to save money", in fact I have worked on two large scale projects to return cloud-migrated services back on site because the costs associated with cloud are high, the pricing is opaque and the service and support is awful.

      I deal with a lot of customers who *want* to go to the cloud, but in a wishful thinking way because they have zero idea of the cost and don't understand that their work processes are bound to complex interdependencies that require multiple complete systems to be moved to some kind of virtualization host at minimum, if not complete re-engineering of applications, migrations to other applications, etc.

      Usually the motivation seems to be driven by short-sighted managers who merely look at potential cost reductions related to staff and/or capex -- they count those savings without understanding the costs they will no absorb, every month for every user, essentially forever and at the whim of their provider.

      Email is the one service that seems to have the most cloud traction, despite the fact that it's generally cheaper over 50 users to run it on-premise given the now-standard assumptions of on-premise virtualization (ie, the marginal infrastructure cost is zero) and reasonably competent IT staff.

      Cloud does make sense for organizations adopting a new application which is expansionary, with all of the usual cautions about cost stability, vendor stability and the extreme lock-in and difficulty in not using that platform in the future should a change become necessary.

      It probably also makes some sense for entirely new businesses that are built around the web or mobile, where core infrastructure and processes are tied to the web anyway and the systems can be engineered for cloud and cloud limitations. It's a lot easier to start a business and ramp it up quickly when you can add demand-based infrastructure vs. on-premise infrastructure.

  19. Missing the problem by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Can we work on eliminating shoppers from the stores? They're the real problems.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Missing the problem by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Hasn't Amazon already done that?

  20. how does it work for real food? by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

    like buying meat and produce by the pound? Or taking stuff out out of place?

     

    1. Re:how does it work for real food? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What, you mean people will just go in these stores and start messing things up by picking items and leaving them in other random shelves just to mess things up?

      Let's just hope this doesn't become a thing! #RandomizeAutomatedStores

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:how does it work for real food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like buying meat and produce by the pound?

      Easily solved by providing packages containing all different amounts.

      Or taking stuff out out of place?

      For the first time, customers that ruin ice cream by reshelving it in the cereals section will be charged for the ice cream that they destroyed since the sensors will reject the reshelving. This is a positive, right?

  21. $200 on Ben Richards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Running Man, here we come!

  22. No retail, no driving, no food service by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    except maybe in the ultra high end where you're paying so you can tell the girl you're dating there's a real chef. Heck, we've already replaced most Sports & Finance writers with algorithms.

    I keep saying this, but we're heading for another industry revolution, and there was 70 years of unemployment, poverty, social strife and wars after the last one that didn't end until new tech caught up with new jobs. It's easy to destroy something, it's harder to create. Jobs are the same way.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:No retail, no driving, no food service by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

      And yet as of today, we have the fewest people out of work aince 1973.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re: No retail, no driving, no food service by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      No you have the fewest people looking for a job since 1973.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:No retail, no driving, no food service by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      And yet as of today, we have the fewest people out of work aince 1973.

      If you look at the real unemployment number, not the "We're only counting people who actively reported looking for work while being out of work in the last four weeks" the unemployment in the US is 40%.

      http://fortune.com/2015/09/14/...

    4. Re:No retail, no driving, no food service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, that 40% includes my 85-year-old grandparents who are, frankly, too sick to work at this point, along with quite a lot of high school students. Is a low employment rate among high school sophomores a crisis?

      Caveats aside, I agree with you that the "official" employment numbers are misleading. OTOH, the unemployment in the US is actually 37.7% by your measure, not 40%: https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

      Also, what does that figure mean? That figure was more like 32% in the late 90s, 36% in the mid-80s, and 40-41% in the 60s. Talking about 40% as the "real" rate compared to a reported rate in the 4-8% range is misleading unless you're saying that the economy is broken until we send my grandparents back to work!

  23. Don't forget JRD... by garryknight · · Score: 1

    So J Random Doofus picks up item A then later on decides that item B is better, and so puts item A back in the wrong place. Doubles my shopping time because I have to double-check that what I've picked up is actually what the label on the shelf says it is. If MS can solve this one (maybe by giving JRD a shock at the time) I'll sign up.

    --
    Garry Knight
    1. Re:Don't forget JRD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JRD J Random Doofus

      Are you trying to make this a thing? Needs work.

    2. Re:Don't forget JRD... by garryknight · · Score: 1

      Yes. J Random Doofus is unemployed. ;-)

      --
      Garry Knight
  24. Re:Apple already tried/did this by mikael · · Score: 1

    The items tend to be a bit pricy:

    https://thetab.com/uk/2017/08/...

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  25. Something went wrong . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please reinstall Windows 10 to complete transaction. Pending charges will remain until installation is completed . . .

  26. M$? M$ IS EVILL!!1111 +6 Insightful by Merk42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't RTFA or even RFTS but it's teh MiKKKRO$OFT so therefore bad!

    1. Re:M$? M$ IS EVILL!!1111 +6 Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reaction is so well-practiced that it comes directly from the spine at this point. Brains, the little lizard ones and the bigger, evolutionary newer ones are bypassed.

  27. Didn't I see Amazon had already been doing this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't I see where Amazon was already testing similar technology in some test brick and mortar stores sometime earlier this year? It identifies you when you walk in, what you pick up, and automatically charges you when you walk out. The tests were limited to Amazon employees. Not sure if they expanded it to the general populace yet.

  28. More surveillance.. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    ..more tracking, more data-mining of personal information, and since it's inherently 'cashless', more opportunities for data breaches stealing your payment information and identity information. Fuck that, fuck Microsoft, fuck 'cashless', fuck having every aspect of our lives 24/7/365 cradle-to-grave surveilled, logged, tracked, analyzed, scrutinized, and monetized. Get the FUCK out of our lives.

  29. Still needs ID checkers! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Still needs ID checkers!

  30. Already there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Microsoft is Working on Technology That Would Eliminate Cashiers and Checkout Lines From Stores, Says Report
    I think they already mastered that one years ago and tested out in their own stores.
    Did anyone see any lines for brown Zunes for example?

  31. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Kristoph · · Score: 1

    This isn't the same thing. You don't 'scan' anything. You come in, you take some things and put them into your bag, and you walk out.

    The premise - at least at the Amazon Go store - is that you must first identify yourself to the store ( using your Amazon account ) and it then tracks you as you move through the store using machine vision. A combination of machine vision and shelf sensors watches as you pick stuff up and adds it to your virtual cart.

    By the time you are ready to leave the store your virtual cart is full - you can optionally check it on your phone - and you then simply walk out and Amazon charges you in the same manner as they would for an online order.

  32. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Kristoph · · Score: 1

    his isn't the same thing. You don't 'scan' anything. You come in, you take some things and put them into your bag, and you walk out.

    The premise - at least at the Amazon Go store - is that you must first identify yourself to the store ( using your Amazon account ) and it then tracks you as you move through the store using machine vision. A combination of machine vision and shelf sensors watches as you pick stuff up and adds it to your virtual cart.

    By the time you are ready to leave the store your virtual cart is full - you can optionally check it on your phone - and you then simply walk out and Amazon charges you in the same manner as they would for an online order.

  33. RFID by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    This is an idea as old as RFID tags! Seriously, when RFID first came out, this is what they said it would be used for.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally disagree. RFID has changed the world in a VERY SMALL way.

    2. Re:RFID by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      This is an idea as old as RFID tags! Seriously, when RFID first came out, this is what they said it would be used for.

      Walmart doesn't want to deploy RFID tags until they can be used for warehouse inventory too. That way they can use the same tracking system for everything. The problem is liquids. An RFID reader, reading a pallet of shampoo doesn't get a positive read on every bottle in the pallet.

  34. Slashdot Shills for microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just look at the post frequency of stories trying to push microsoft goods/services/don't judge us by our past judge us by what we do now crap.

    You can't buy my love microsoft. No matter how much you pay or how many companies you buy.

  35. Cash isn't always efficient by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Well, that would not seem wise, to be voluntarily shutting yourself off from a large amount of potential business, just to not take cash.

    That depends heavily on what you are selling and who you are selling it to. I guarantee the Apple Store isn't doing a lot of cash transactions. Amazon seems to be doing alright and the vast majority of what they sell doesn't involve paper money at all. Other companies like McDonalds or Walmart do rather a lot of cash business. Cash isn't inherently good or bad but companies shouldn't be obligated to handle it if it reduces their profits.

    And hey, not everyone has a smartphone, you know?

    No but the number of people who do is a huge number - presently around 77% of Americans. It's plausible that the money saved by not having to handle cash more than makes up for the lost customers. Honestly I don't know anyone in my personal life who dogmatically uses cash. Most I know use it when they have to but don't prefer it.

    I have plenty of credit...I could use, but I also would rather buy with cash and not have my purchases associated with my identity as much as possible.

    That's fine as long as you recognize that the vendors are under no obligation to sell to you if they prefer to be paid with credit cards or some other form of payment. I think you are being a little paranoid but I understand valuing privacy and respect the impulse.

    I"m certainly not alone with wanting to use cash for one of any number of valid reasons, and I can't imagine a business wanting to bar itself from a large amount of potential revenue.

    It's not about the amount of revenue. It's about the amount of PROFIT. Not all revenue generates equal profits. Cash transactions tend to be small in value so you need a lot of them to make handling cash worthwhile. Many businesses fit this profile but many others do not. For my company cash would be a LOT more hassle than checks or credit cards since most of our transactions with our customers are thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars.

    1. Re:Cash isn't always efficient by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Per my other post....I've yet to see in the US, a non-cash business in meatspace.

      Do we know if the amazon store does NOT take cash?

      It may take over..but I don't see it going fully that way in my lifetime.

      And honestly, I don't know if it is a good idea, especially with recent news about banks and whole POS systems going offline and losing business, if no cash that's loss of all business during down time. If the power grid is terrorist attacked.....what will you buy things with before it comes back if it is down an extended period of time?

      I tend to think this move, so far, is mostly outside the US, I mean, we still write and take checks here.....you know? While that isn't exactly cash, it is cash equivalent and doesn't require a network connection to accept and deposit.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Cash isn't always efficient by lgw · · Score: 1

      Do we know if the amazon store does NOT take cash?

      The Amazon Go store has no checkout or register of any kind. You check in, pick up what you want, and walk out.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Cash isn't always efficient by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I've see many businesses that take cash refuse to do business if their computer system is down. For some business that are corporate that is actually a policy, to prevent pilfering, because they don't trust their own employees.

      They also refuse to take checks during that time, because they can't check for verification.

      I never expect to see cash disappear in the U.S.. It's too hard to hide bribes, buy or sell on the black market or laundry cash if you get ride of cash. Considering our businesses and government they will never allow cash to disappear.

  36. Yes MS is in the data mining business by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is not in the business of data mining.

    Bullshit they aren't. Bing gets its revenue from ads. Linked-In gets lots of money from data mining. Microsoft sells data mining tools. Your faith in Microsoft on this topic is wildly incorrect.

  37. Checkout adds zero value and costs lots by sjbe · · Score: 1

    How about solving problems that actually exist? We already have "self checkouts". Is that a major problem that needs addressing?

    Yes it is a major problem because it's a major cost for retailers. Most retailers have fairly thin margins and anything they can do to reduce headcount and other costs in the checkout process is something worth considering. There is NOTHING value added about the checkout process. It's necessary but it does not add value to the customer or the product. If anything it makes the shopping experience notably less pleasant. It's a cost center for the retailer which they would happily get rid of if they could.

    1. Re:Checkout adds zero value and costs lots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Mr. MBA over here, with his "thin margins" and his "cost centers".

      I don't give a flying fig about how much profit my local megamart makes in a given day! I want to shop at a store run by humans, who can answer questions and otherwise be helpful. I am already paying way too much for most products, because of all the faceless corporations in the supply chain who all complain about "thin margins" but are still able to offer 50% discounts when the warehouse is full. Please, make me care about profit!

    2. Re:Checkout adds zero value and costs lots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you say you are paying too much, but you want the retailers to have higher costs. How is this going to help you pay less?

    3. Re:Checkout adds zero value and costs lots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have confused "price" with "cost". The price is what the market is willing to pay. Cost is the amount the seller has to recover to break even. Price minus cost equals profit. What do I care if retailers can lower costs, since they certainly aren't going to pass the savings on to me? And if increased profits come with the negative impact of an unpleasant shopping experience for the consumer, I might have to lower the price I am willing to pay - oh boo hoo, profits have gone down again!

  38. Purchase Microsoft Office outright? by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    Sort of . $149.99 (one-time purchase) gets you Office Home & Student 2016 for Win7 and later, includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote but doesn't include Outlook or Access.

  39. Cashiers add no value by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Cashiers rank among the top jobs in the US by numbers employed.

    It is true that a lot of people are employed as cashiers. This is unfortunate because the job of cashier is not a value added job. It doesn't make the product better, it doesn't improve the shopping experience, and it's a large cost to both the retailer and the customer.

    Is Microsoft also working on technology that will eliminate the problems they're planning on creating when they make millions of jobs obsolete?

    No and nor should they. You're typing this on a computer and you don't see the irony in your argument? Should Microsoft have been subsidizing Smith Corona typewriters because PCs reduced the need for clerical staff? Should Ford have been worrying about what happened to people who ride horses? The job of cashier adds NO value. It's necessary to ensure the transaction takes place but it doesn't benefit the customer or the retailer and it certainly should not be maintained as a jobs program if we can do away with that task. All it does is add cost to the transaction for everyone involved. That is not a job worth protecting.

    Not to mention the fact that a lot of consumer spending and business revenue depends on millions of people being employable.

    They remain employable - they'll just be doing something else.

    1. Re:Cashiers add no value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is true that a lot of people are employed as cashiers. This is unfortunate because the job of cashier is not a value added job. It doesn't make the product better, it doesn't improve the shopping experience, and it's a large cost to both the retailer and the customer.

      I disagree re: human cashiers not improving the shopping experience, but more to the point, you should be careful with such assertions, especially if you work in the tech sector: Large swaths of highly skilled workers in our society are actively *subtracting* value. At least cashiers are mostly benign.

  40. Re: Apple already tried/did this by houghi · · Score: 1

    They do that in several supermarkets in Belgium. Double winner, because people must use a storecard, so they can see you buying habbits and they can fire some people.
    Fraud it defeated by checking people at random. Toomuch failure and you probably are nit allowed to use it anymore.

    I do not use it sopeople keep their job and my data is more valuable than my time. And the more vallue my time is, the more my data is valuable.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  41. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Jhon · · Score: 1

    Yeah. The premise is great! But seeing as we're a mostly "service based" economy now, what's the consequences when we only need to hire a fraction of the people currently working *IN* services?

  42. Sure you do... by sjbe · · Score: 2

    I pay for things with cash. If a business doesn't take cash, they don't get my business.

    Really? You never write a check? Never use a credit or debit card? You make your house payment in cash? Pay your utilities in cash? You purchased your PC in cash?

    Yeah I don't believe you are telling the truth. If you are then I kind of pity you.

    1. Re:Sure you do... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I pay in cash where ever possible, yes. My bills are paid via my credit union's free bill pay service. Is it really that surprising to you that somebody would value their privacy enough to be slightly inconvenienced?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Sure you do... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Many utility companies allow you to pay in cash through affiliated stores. Typically pharmacies, corner grocery stores, money transfer places.

      Why not buy a PC in cash, especially used? It's a few-hundred-dollar purchase at most these days -- they've become a commodity item.

    3. Re:Sure you do... by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Many utility companies allow you to pay in cash through affiliated stores.

      I'm aware though few people actually do this. Most who do are people who cannot get a proper bank account or credit card.

      Why not buy a PC in cash, especially used?

      Because acquiring and carrying a wad of cash that large is more than a little inconvenient. I cannot remember the last time I walked around with more than about $200 cash on my person. And none of the PCs I would actually buy cost an amount of money where a cash transaction makes much sense.

      It's a few-hundred-dollar purchase at most these days -- they've become a commodity item.

      One only has to walk into an Apple store to disprove that. A cheap PC that is worth half a shit costs $400 and they go up steeply from there.

    4. Re:Sure you do... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The only thing that walking into a Crapple store proves is the quote about fools and money, and the one about suckers and minutes.

      As far as PCs, I've usually bought second-hand off Craigslist, and $100-150 is my price point. For a decent few-year-old laptop like a Thinkpad X-series at that... the things depreciate like rocks.

    5. Re:Sure you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You never write a check? Never use a credit or debit card? You make your house payment in cash? Pay your utilities in cash? You purchased your PC in cash?
      Yeah I don't believe you are telling the truth. If you are then I kind of pity you.

      Everything you listed, and many things you didn't, are still very possible to pay cash only.
      I can easily believe it to be true as I used to do the exact same thing. I still do pay with cash to an extent but no longer to an extent I'd claim "cash only"

      Paying utilities in cash is the most trivial and easy you have listed. All of the major grocery chains around have a dedicated place inside to do exactly that, and as I need groceries it isn't even something out of the way.

      Beyond that, I am fortunate enough to live in a city with a Microcenter store, so buying computer gear there with cash works out great. Their selection is huge and really only topped by Amazon.

      I did make my house payment for many years in cash, although admit it was a bit of a special situation in my case. I only changed to the check writing service of my credit union after the person I'm repaying the loan to moved out of state.

      Even then, I have no actual checks for my checking account.
      I have no credit cards but do have and use a debit card on occasion and a prepaid card though a service that is specifically geared towards online shopping.
      They allow you to create "virtual credit cards" with a fixed dollar limit and a given expiration date (2-12 months anyway), and once a merchant charges to it, the card is locked to that merchant.
      If the number and info is intercepted, it is no good to anyone as the automated charge locked who can use it. For reoccurring payments that is useful as well, plus I can disable any number as needed to stop future charges.

      I used to have my pay split between a smaller amount direct deposited and the remainder kept under the limit so they could pay out in cash. (Over 1000 and they must cut a check, which would need to go through a bank so might as well direct deposit it all at that point)
      Only a couple years ago when the company changed to ADP did they go to direct deposit only.

      I've found there is nothing I *need* that can't be purchased with cash, and quite a lot of things I *want* just the same, with the vast majority of the rest possible to buy in cash but with some amount of inconvenience in doing so. (Ex I'd need to go to the store instead of click a button on Amazon and have it show up on my doorstep)

      I'm not sure why you would pity someone simply because we choose to live our lives differently, and most importantly in a way that doesn't effect you in any way.

    6. Re:Sure you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checks (cheques) are dead as the dodo in most places outside of the US.

      I use cash only for any and all purchases under $1000-2000. That Includes my utilities (not sure about the US, but in this country you can do that at your local post-office). Rent is an envelope of cash taken to the agent once a fortnight, though the deposit was done electronically (annoying legal requirement).

      I built my PC from parts I purchased for cash. I used cash to purchase my laptop (and gave fake information when asked). My phone was secondhand (cost $0), and I recharge with those cards you buy at the supermarket (for cash).

      I do very occasionally make purchases on ebay and the like, so I do have a credit card, but those are few and far between.

    7. Re:Sure you do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because acquiring and carrying a wad of cash that large is more than a little inconvenient. I cannot remember the last time I walked around with more than about $200 cash on my person. And none of the PCs I would actually buy cost an amount of money where a cash transaction makes much sense.

      This genuinely surprises me. As I sit in front of my computer I have (checks pocket) $234.85 on me right now. $200 is not so much that you walk around in fear of being robbed, not so little that you end up having to pull out the credit card for exceptional-but-not-too-exceptional expenses (say your car broke down and you need a tow, or you want to do the week's grocery shopping on the way home or whatever).

      Let me put it another way. A coffee costs, what, $3 min? Lunch/snacks/whatever - say in the range $0-$30/day? Petrol... I don't know, *at least* $40/week? We're already in the ~$150-ish range. That doesn't include randoms (I don't know: pens, a book, whatever). Plus you don't want to get caught short - you want $20-50 on you at all times (absolute minimum) for "just in case" expenses. Assume you withdraw cash once a week you're talking $200+ at the very least - then you need to factor in groceries, clothes etc - you're looking at $400-500 withdrawal, in your pocket for at least the time it takes to get from ATM to supermarket.

      But then I'm guessing you're a credit-card by default type person. Which is fine, but try to keep some perspective.

  43. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >so the fraud must be at an acceptable level, as with self-service checkouts.

    Huh, no wonder. Waitrose uses Gestapo lever intimidation tactics against accused shoplifters:
    Handcuffed in Waitrose: the innocent man in search of justice
    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/nov/26/innocent-man-handcuffed-waitrose-mistaken-identity-nightmare-christopher-seddon

    They seized me, then handcuffed me with my arms behind my back, stating that they were arresting me on suspicion of shoplifting 17 days earlier, in spite of the fact that on that day I hadn’t even been in Chesham. The security guard thrust a mobile phone in my face [with a CCTV still on it] and screamed ‘do you deny this is you?’ at me. All this was going on in front of dozens of shoppers.”

    He says he was not allowed to call his mother, who he knew would be distressed when he inexplicably failed to return.

    What a lovely place to shop.

  44. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you're coming in with multiple people, like, say, a mother with her 3 kids? the mother signs in with her prime account, but her kids don't. If the kids take items off the shelf and puts them in mom's bag, does an alarm go off? Are they apprehended by store security if they leave? Or is the "machine vision" smart enough to charge the items to mom's account?

  45. Sams' Club leading the way by jmcwork · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am not sure I understand how this would be different from the Sam's Club 'Scan and Go' app I used the other day. I scanned each item (who really needs a 2 gallon jar of mayo??) and put it in my cart. When I was done, I told it to pay with my credit card and it generated a upc code and a receipt. The person at the door looked at the receipt, scanned the code and I was gone. No waiting in line. Yes, there is the risk of putting an item in you cart without scanning. I would assume that if you are buying an iPad or other expensive item (that could possibly be hidden) they would do something like 'Hey, let me scan that for you to make sure it comes up with the correct price."

    1. Re:Sams' Club leading the way by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I am not sure I understand how this would be different from the Sam's Club 'Scan and Go' app I used the other day. I scanned each item (who really needs a 2 gallon jar of mayo??) and put it in my cart. When I was done, I told it to pay with my credit card and it generated a upc code and a receipt. The person at the door looked at the receipt, scanned the code and I was gone. No waiting in line. Yes, there is the risk of putting an item in you cart without scanning. I would assume that if you are buying an iPad or other expensive item (that could possibly be hidden) they would do something like 'Hey, let me scan that for you to make sure it comes up with the correct price."

      Don't you scan a card and you pick it up after you've paid? That way, small high value items are hard to steal because there are none on the shelf, only a stack of cards showing the item and its barcode. What sucks is you can't scan and go alcohol and have them check your ID on the way out.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:Sams' Club leading the way by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Blame the stupid American government for this -- pushing states to be serious about drinking age laws. In most civilized countries, drinking age is 18, and a suggestion at that, not a firm rule.

    3. Re:Sams' Club leading the way by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Blame the stupid American government for this -- pushing states to be serious about drinking age laws. In most civilized countries, drinking age is 18, and a suggestion at that, not a firm rule.

      Yup; they are stupid laws that just push underage drinking into teh shadows and cause more problems. Sam's doesn't want to risk its liquor license by accidentally selling beer or wine to a minor.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  46. Accepting cash by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Per my other post....I've yet to see in the US, a non-cash business in meatspace.

    Yes you have but I think you mean retailers. Most (though not all) retailers accept cash but many other businesses do not as a general practice and the number is increasing. Heck my company pretty much never deals in cash. We could in principle but it would be wildly inconvenient and cost a lot more because we aren't a retailer.

    It may take over..but I don't see it going fully that way in my lifetime.

    I would agree with that though I do think you will see increasing numbers of businesses that find cash to not be worth the bother. It really comes down to whether the increased revenue and profits offsets the added cost of handling the cash. For most businesses it does but not all. But if companies could do away with checkout counters and their costs in exchange for not handling cash anymore I think some of them will take the plunge.

    I tend to think this move, so far, is mostly outside the US, I mean, we still write and take checks here.....you know? While that isn't exactly cash, it is cash equivalent and doesn't require a network connection to accept and deposit.

    Writing checks sort of speaks to how backwards our system is here in the US. And yes checks do require a network connection at some point albeit not necessarily at the point of sale. Many retailers will not accept them unless they can verify them electronically. Frankly checks are hugely annoying and expensive to the retailer. Younger people tend to use a lot less of them. I can't remember the last time I saw someone under the age of 50 using a check at the grocery store.

  47. Re:Apple already tried/did this by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with that steak?!

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  48. They've got bill feeders by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    at the self checkout lanes. You can still pay with cash.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  49. Re:Apple already tried/did this by lgw · · Score: 1

    Yeah. The premise is great! But seeing as we're a mostly "service based" economy now, what's the consequences when we only need to hire a fraction of the people currently working *IN* services?

    They move on to new services, which people can now afford because other things are cheaper. There are successful startups now for (internet shopping-style) lawn mowing, car washing, dry cleaner pick-up/delivery, all sorts of recurring business like that. Stuff you could easily do yourself, but hey, if it's cheap enough, why not have someone else do it?

    As with every historical displacement of workers, new jobs are created because the middle class can afford more, normally goods or services that only the rich could afford before. There are lots of well-funded start-ups getting investor attention right now for just such services. Guess what will be popular and make your own millions from your start-up.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  50. Vast difference between doing and thinking by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Amazon Go is actually in the real world today, learning what works and where the edge cases are.

    No amount of planning or thought process or technology will make a working system, until Microsoft has some trial stores up and operating like Go does, I don't think they are a very serious contender in this space.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  51. they can free in store ones to rent like self scan by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    they can free in store ones to rent like the self scan stores.

  52. old ideas keep coming back around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when we starting putting RFID tags in everything? The promise was that you could roll a shopping cart through a reader and the contents of the entire cart would be scanned at once. That was before we had NFC payment systems.

    What ever happened? I have yet to see a retailer that can scan more than an item at a time, manually, in spite of this technology forecast being decades old.

  53. cash what about WIC, food stamps, EBT? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    cash what about WIC, food stamps, EBT?

    1. Re:cash what about WIC, food stamps, EBT? by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      In many areas those programs have changed over to using a card. I know SNAP (the current version of Food Stamps) uses a card that works through the same terminals as credit/debit cards.

    2. Re:cash what about WIC, food stamps, EBT? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      just look at the WIC - Vendor Training video each state has it's own rules and in some case WIC must be done as it's own transaction some times 2 for one order.

  54. There goes another basic job. by X!0mbarg · · Score: 1

    I already avoid the Self Checkout Lanes like the Plague that they are.
    Any store that tries this will loose me as even a potential customer.
    No sense in going to a store that will likely be having me stock the shelves as I browse next.
    Frankly, I can easily see Amazon buying out a Goliath like Walmart, and having a fleet of delivery drones, small cars and vans, with minimal store staff, and a discount option of "pick it yourself" for keeping the Brick and Mortar part of the store open to the people that just have to see an item before they purchase.

    'Nuf Sed.

    1. Re:There goes another basic job. by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      No sense in going to a store that will likely be having me stock the shelves as I browse next.

      This is a brilliant idea. In fact if you have certification with a pallet jack or fork lift you can get a 10% discount for each trailer you unload.

  55. studen loans with no bankruptcy, trades being push by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    studen loans with no bankruptcy, trades being push down by schools, and to many jobs that want an college degree but then say people with college degrees don't have the right skills.

  56. It's just a deli by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    The impact of this tech is always exaggerated.

    Basically, they are just saying they can automate check out at 7-11 and other convenience stores and delis.

    Meanwhile, people like me will continue to pay with cash and if you automate my checkout, you lose me as a customer.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  57. speaking of Amazon Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of Amazon Go, where is the big story about how wonderful and fantastic it is? Still working out the kinks, I suppose. Not a big success, I suppose.

  58. they're stopping half way by sxpert · · Score: 1

    They should go ahead and also eliminate the concept of money, finally getting us to a star-trek like society where no one is either hungry or homeless !

    1. Re: they're stopping half way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a star trek society number only 200 million people. I can stand behind that - you and your family go away first

  59. and customers too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs to get rid of customers too...it needs only corporates...

  60. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the exact same thing in the US, only we put things in carts instead of trolleys. That's not what the article is about.

  61. Loss on several levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loss of jobs and human dynamics.

    I work with computers all day. When I shop, I avoid yet another interaction with a machine. Don't like automated voice when I call customer support or billing either.

    It's not just the loss of human interaction, in both cases, the data exchange rate with machines is too low.

  62. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

    It's ridiculous how concerned people are about eliminating the most horridly unpleasant jobs in a time of historically low unemployment. Get rid of those supermarket checker jobs nobody actually enjoys and either the freed labor will go to something more pleasant or -- in your nightmare scenario which there's no evidence of whatsoever in all of history and so much evidence against in the present -- we can all work 30 hours weeks to share the miraculously decreased need for work.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank
  63. Re: This already exists downtown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes. Glad I'm not the only one that has noticed, your editors are TOO YOUNG. It exists in supermarkets, too. And guess what? They still have a ton of employees on the floor. Sigh. I miss the good Slashdot.

  64. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They move on to new services, which people can now afford because other things are cheaper.

    It depends on the rate of change. If enough people lose their jobs in short order you end up with a depression, and people aren't spending anything on cheaper stuff because they are broke.

  65. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may sound odd to you, but I've met people who have enjoyed working on checkouts.

    30 hour weeks for everyone is unlikely, as 40 hour weeks for some, and 0 hours for some is cheaper for firms, at least at any given point in time, even if overall 30 hours for everyone might lead to a better economy.

  66. windows phones = Ghosttown by stooo · · Score: 1

    >>Microsoft is Working on Technology That Would Eliminate Cashiers and Checkout Lines From Stores, Says Report
    Yeah. The report doesn't say it also eliminates customers from the stores.
    Perhaps they try to sell windows phones, and transform the surrounding of these stores into a Ghosttown.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  67. Cops by stooo · · Score: 1

    >>You come in, you take some things and put them into your bag, and you walk out.
    Works for me.
    Then some cashiers with strange uniforms and weapons come and put you down on the floor before taking you to the nearest prison.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  68. fraught by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what happens when a customer changes their mind and removes an item from their cart and leaves it on a shelf - not necessarily the shelf it came from?
    What if a customer wants to pay with cash?
    What if a customer wants to pay with a credit card not on file with Amazon (or whoever).
    What if a customer needs to do separate transactions for some items?
    What if a customer is shopping and they get a text from someone, say an emergency, and they have to leave the store and they just leave the filled cart behind?
    I could go on and on and on... Are computers really capable of being programmed to handle every possible scenario?

    1. Re:fraught by CrazyCaps · · Score: 1

      Yes, computers can be programmed to handle many scenarios like that. There will also be a few people in customer service that can deal with the issues that arise.

      --
      Drive it like you stole it!
  69. Useless work by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    Is Microsoft also working on technology that will eliminate the problems they're planning on creating when they make millions of jobs obsolete?

    We already have the necessary technology. You split the people into two groups and give them shovels. The first group digs holes and the second group fills them back in.

  70. I am NOT a cashier. F Walmart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They add plenty of value. I don't work for Walmart. I'm not checking out my own products. I'm the asshole that makes them open a line or I leave 3 buggies of stuff thawing out in the middle of the floor. How much money did they "save" then?

  71. Self-serve checkouts? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    We have those, and have had them for some years.

    In both supermarkets and department stores.

    I detest and avoid them.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  72. I pay with card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay for things with my check card. If a business doesn't take my check card, they don't get my business.

    I refused to pay my water bill to our water co-op (Hillsville Utility District) for over a year because they wouldn't take a card. They wanted me to mail in a CHECK or drive down to pay cash. What kind of 80s bullshit is that? Every time they cut my water off, I walked my happy ass outside and turned it back on. When they wanted to get bitchy about that citing laws and other such nonsense threatening to sue, I gave them the business card of my lawyer and told em to bring it. They never brought it.

    This customer is always right...and is an asshole.

  73. Nespresso does this by Beechmere2000 · · Score: 1

    Our Nespresso shops already do most of this. You walk in, grab a paper bag, then place all the covfefe sleeves you want into the bag. Then you put the bag in a scanner bin which reads the RFID info on each sleeve and tells you how much you will pay. Then you swipe or tap your smartcard, get a receipt printed out and walk out. Obviously, the next step is to have your phone recognised as you walk in, and an app automatically activates which informs you how much your're buying. Once you walk out of the store, your purchase is registered and your account is debited. The receipt appears as an SMS. You might probably have to scan each sleeve to make sure you're buying your own items and not the person near you.

  74. Re:Apple already tried/did this by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    The consequences are simple... people will either have to create new jobs based on vanity as we'll cover necessity. Or we'll have to work towards some form of communism.

    There is such a thing as an "eye brow plucking shop"... no shit... it exists.. they're all over and they exist because we ran out of jobs that meet the needs of the people and now we focus instead on making people into social workers for the elderly and unemployed.

  75. Loss prevention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cashiers that this technology replaces will become the new loss-prevention personnel.

  76. This was my idea!! by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    I already designed and setup this very type of system. I demoed it to Wal-Mart about 10 years ago. They thought it was too-far ahead of its time, customers would not like it, and were not interested at that time. Time to dust off paperwork. Microsoft and/or Wal-Mart better not be stealing what I showed them!

  77. Re:Apple already tried/did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i would make mistakes every single time

    well i already do them anyway, everytime i have to press a button with the prince in a bag of the same kinds of fruits, for some reason i always make the mistake and select the cheapest one, its great because its just a mistake, I like people working in my stores, less mistakes that way

  78. Re:they can free in store ones to rent like self s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Rent" - sounds like a money grubbers wet dream. I'm sure you don't mean "rent" as in you pay to use this, but more or less, "rent" as in, you borrow this, but be assured, some business is going to make people pay for the usage.

  79. Re:Apple already tried/did this by KingBenny · · Score: 1

    unless you ban technology this is inevitable ... the only solution is to stop breeding or to actually colonize space ... but if i were evil as "them" i'd derive some pleasure from seeing all those "hard workers" going down into a zone theyve never been before . I'd almost say KARMA'S A BITCH BITCH

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  80. Why pay cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have fun with that.
    I'll enjoy my 2 months of interest free time to pay before the bills hit my high interest savings or brokerage accounts. 1 year of extended warranty and 2% - 30% of all my purchases going towards my next vacation
    Plus I can honestly tell panhandlers and shady cab drivers that I have no cash.
    Plus I have my cache of anonymous gift cards for when I want anonymity.
    The interest I make between putting a purchase on my credit card to the time that it actually gets paid out of my assets is about 140 dollars a year for literally nothing. The credit card rewards I make are thousands of dollars a year.

    What exactly is it that you're getting from paying with cash?