Slashdot Mirror


User: oh_my_080980980

oh_my_080980980's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,592
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,592

  1. Re:Must example set of him on Florida Teen Charged With Felony Hacking For Changing Desktop Wallpaper · · Score: 0

    You feel sorry for some snot nosed kid. Really? Wow someone needs a life.

  2. Re: Must example set of him on Florida Teen Charged With Felony Hacking For Changing Desktop Wallpaper · · Score: 1

    Maybe the kid shouldn't have hacked into the teachers computer - you know - which is breaking the law. Idiot.

  3. Re: Must example set of him on Florida Teen Charged With Felony Hacking For Changing Desktop Wallpaper · · Score: 1

    Do you understand the law Potsy. That's what matters. You don't like it, then change the law. Don't go crying because the cop did their job. What the kid did also amounts to cyber bullying. Feel lucky he wasn't charged with that.

  4. Re:no side to pick. on Japanese Court Orders Google To Remove Negative Reviews From Google Maps · · Score: 1

    RTFA: "Removal of any kind of public content is troubling, particularly when the process behind it appears to be little more than an on-record denial." http://techcrunch.com/2015/04/...

    Japan can go fuck itself.

  5. Re:"Highly Qualified" on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    You need a masters in education to teach.

  6. Re:If this thread is like all the others... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    THANK YOU! Jesus pull your heads out of your asses people. This has nothing to do with education but training a segment of high school students to be code monkeys! Go grief how fucking stupid are you - never mind, don't answer your programmers so you cant think outside your own logical construct.

    Also sounds like a lot of you were ass raped by Calculus. If you can make it through a Calc I course you have problems. Though I suspect the problem is you didn't put effort into it, unlike World of Warcraft. Morons.

  7. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    Because you entered a Computer Science program with the intention of being a programmer. Computer Science is more than programmer and you posts show you abundant ignorance about the subject. The fact that you want to comment on education is scary.

  8. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    Computer Science is not about programming. Programming is not Computer Science. You don't need to take a Computer Science class to be a code monkey.

  9. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    Which you don't take in HIGH SCHOOL. That's the point. Taking programming does not benefit society. Good god low information people.

  10. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    Why? Because you need to to know how a TV or bluray player or iPad or iWatch or Google Glasses works in order to use them? Do drivers know how an internal combustion engine works or know the oil grade the engine needs to operate? No. You just need to know how to use it. In a computers case, how to turn it on, and use the program that use need to use. That's it. How the computer processes information is not relevant to the user.

    Computer Science is not a core high school subject and computer programming is not computer science.

  11. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 1

    It's not a core course and no one is stopping you from taking an elective, which programming falls under.

  12. Re:Double tassel ... on Senate Draft of No Child Left Behind Act Draft Makes CS a 'Core' Subject · · Score: 3, Informative

    And Microsoft fired 20,000 people. Fuck Off.

  13. Re:One highly-publicized case is all it took on Reason: How To Break the Internet (in a Bad Way) · · Score: 1

    Yo ass-hole http://qz.com/256586/the-insid... enough said.

  14. Re:Reason: for corporations, by corporations on Reason: How To Break the Internet (in a Bad Way) · · Score: 0

    What fucking control ass-hole. Seriously eat shit and die. You didn't bother to read the FCC Rules so fuck off. You like getting ass raped by Verizon so bend over and pucker. The rest of are tired of it. The FCC is preventing Verizon from double dipping that's all.

  15. Re:Reason: for corporations, by corporations on Reason: How To Break the Internet (in a Bad Way) · · Score: 5, Informative

    You mean like Verizon extorting money from Netflix, you mean that EXAMPLE.

  16. It make more sense... on With H-1B Cap Hit, Zuckerberg and Ballmer-Led Groups Press For More Tech Visas · · Score: 1

    ...if Microsoft had hired 20,000 people instead of fired 20,000 people an said that wasn't enough. With high levels of unemployment it's hard to make the argument that there isn't enough people.

  17. Re: With H-1B Cap Hit, CEOS Press for Outright Sla on With H-1B Cap Hit, Zuckerberg and Ballmer-Led Groups Press For More Tech Visas · · Score: 1

    Citation needed from someone who posts anonymously? Pull the other one ass-hole.

  18. Re:Lies, bullshit, and more lies ... on With H-1B Cap Hit, Zuckerberg and Ballmer-Led Groups Press For More Tech Visas · · Score: 1

    Ballmer is that you?

  19. Re:This is asinine. on First Lawsuits Challenging FCC's New Net Neutrality Rules Arrive · · Score: 1

    They have yet to prove a hardship, especially since the all the rules have not been gone into effect; which most likely means they have no standing and this lawsuit gets tossed.

  20. Re:Transparency in Government is good! on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 2

    Then no one should get excited when they don't respond since they are not required too.

  21. Re:"Most transparent administration.." NOT! on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 0

    More so than Bush. Did Cheney release transcripts of those secret meetings with the oil companies.

  22. Re:the fix to the problem on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 2, Informative

    LMOL scary when people don't read. The White House was always except from FIOA. Try again Zippy.

  23. Re:Sounds reasonable to me on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 2, Informative

    Considering the FOIA act does not apply to the White House, I don't know why you are whining.

  24. Re:The State Run Media did not report this on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 0

    Because there's nothing to be outraged over.

  25. Re:Fine. on White House Office of Administration Not Subject to FOIA, Says White House · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA jackass. Nothing heinous is going on. Offices within the White House are exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. However, the Office of Administration was the odd man out. In 2009, a Federal Court ruling confirmed that the Office of Administration is exempt from FOIA like other Offices within the White House.

    The White House is required to archive e-mails and release them under the Presidential Records Act; not until at least five years after the end of the administration.

    So the sky is not falling.