Slashdot Mirror


User: Khashishi

Khashishi's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
3,289
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 3,289

  1. Re:Smart Holsters! on Hardware That Recognizes You · · Score: 1

    If you are scared of that not working, I suggest you don't drive a car since A)The cars electics could fail or B) Traffic lights could fail.
    They can and often do fail. The difference is that the odds that it's an emergency situation are a hell of a lot lower in the case of the car and traffic lights.

    Well it may not be an emergency before your car fails, but it may very well be one after it fails.

  2. Re:WHY DON'T WE BOMB THE DRUG FIELDS? on Round-Up Ready Coca Plants · · Score: 1

    then we'll get mutant, explosive-resistant, man-eating coca plants which will take over the world

  3. Re:like anti virus companies on Anti-Spyware Vendor Partners with Spyware Company? · · Score: 1

    So, are you saying that anti-spyware companies will have their business destroyed as well? Or are lusers too dense to make the connection in this case?

  4. Re:Let's Get Some Facts in This Biatch =) (formatt on Election Day Discussion · · Score: 1

    Sure we know Bush is an idiot. The problem is that we know that Kerry is an idiot also.

  5. I feel bad for the guys on Spam-maker Hormel Spends to Reclaim Name · · Score: 1

    but they will never reclaim the name

  6. condorcet is broken on Pre-Election Discussion · · Score: 1

    Condorcet voting strongly favors the middle.
    Given parties A, B, and C, where A and C have opposite views and B has moderate views, most A voters will choose B over C and most C voters will choose B over A. What this means is if A and C are mostly balanced, B will win. This is the case even if A or C actually had the majority and B had very few top votes.

    What this means is that you will end up with all serious candidates acting the same, vying for the middle, trying to displease the fewest number of people, by having no strong position on anything.

  7. why do we need top level domains at all? on Two New TLD's Near Approval · · Score: 2, Insightful

    couldn't it just be www.google or http://slashdot?

  8. I'll sell you my pentium 1 for $100, ballmer on How Cheap Can A PC Be? · · Score: 1

    I'll even pay for shipping.

  9. simple solution on Keeping Computers (And People) Warm In Winter? · · Score: 1

    remove heatsink

  10. miscategorized on Secure, Portable, Virtual Privacy Machine · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is more of a gadget than a your-rights-online

  11. Re:Librarian Annoyer becomes TV DoS device on The Universal Off Button · · Score: 1

    What you really need is a remote-control-remote-control. That way you can control your hidden remote control remotely.

  12. Re:Where did the oil come from? on Zero-emission Power Plants Proposed · · Score: 1

    Geez, on that scale rocks are impatient.

  13. Re:Human survival on Russian Mock Mars Mission · · Score: 1

    New rule, if you come out before 500 days, they will shoot you.

  14. Re:The shortcomings of SQL on An Alternative to SQL? · · Score: 1
    SQL syntax is far too wordy that it really hurts usability. It's not _too_ painful when you are writing a software interface, but when you just want to make some quick queries at the prompt, it's godawful to have to type lines which wrap around the text window. Seriously, couldn't we change
    select (id, desc, name) from mytable where flag = 1
    to something like (a lot of options here)
    mytable(id,desc,name):flag = 1
    and
    select * from a left join b using id where a.foo = 'bar'
    to
    (a*b|id):a.foo = 'bar'
    and
    insert into baz values (1,2,3)
    to
    +baz(1,2,3)