Slashdot Mirror


Russian Mock Mars Mission

sdriver writes "CNN reports that Russia is attempting a 500-day mock Mars mission. The article goes on to say, "six volunteers will depend on a preset limit of supplies, including about 5 tons of food and oxygen and 3 tons of water." Also, "Experiment participation is not solely reserved for Russian volunteers, institute officials added."

333 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mars comes to cosmonauts!

    (Sorry, I had to.)

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1, Funny

      Our new insect overlords welcome, for one, YOU!

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "(Sorry, I had to.)"

      Why? Are you on a mission to make sure the joke is never funny again?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "where did that joke come from anyway?"

      It comes froms from a joke that Yakov Smirnoff (sp?) made. I can't quote the joke. Something like "In Soviet Russia, the party holds YOU!" or something like that.

      Part of me wonders if the resurgence of this joke came from an episode of Family Guy where Peter bought a car with a GPS featuring Yakov mode.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:In Soviet Russia... by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Theres also a Simpsons episode where bart and grandpa go to Branson,Missiouri and see a play called Thats Familiar with "performers that you though were dead, like bonnie franklin and adrian zmed..." and at the end Yakov comes out and says "In soviet union review watches you"

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
  2. Heh by bigjocker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, if the US mocked the moon landing, I suppose it's time for the russians for their share of airtime!!!

    --
    Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      When they are done mocking Mars, they can move on to the other minor gods, then move up to Jupiter and Saturn!

      Doesn't seem like a great idea, but at least they have a plan.

    2. Re:Heh by Lokni · · Score: 1

      At least the Russians are being honest about it though.

    3. Re:Heh by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Please, if NASA was attempting this, everyone on slashdot would be shouting WASTE OF MONEY!!!!! SPEND IT SOMEWHERE ELSE BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!

    4. Re:Heh by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Mocking the God of War doesn't seem like a good way to start any plan.

    5. Re:Heh by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      Mocking the God of War doesn't seem like a good way to start any plan.

      Exactly, just see what Saddam got out of it...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    6. Re:Heh by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I wasn't the only person who read that story as "Russians mock mars mission"

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  3. soviet mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    On Soviet Mars, they mock Russia. "HA! Weak humans."

  4. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Mars Mission Mocks YOU!

  5. Hasn't this been done before by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 1

    "Capricorn One" anyone?

    1. Re:Hasn't this been done before by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Reminds me more of BioDome, actually. Will Pauly Shore take part in this?

    2. Re:Hasn't this been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new reality show...

  6. Given enough bandwidth... by GrAfFiT · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...it's ok for me !

    1. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can have all the bandwidth you can eat, but, the simulated latency, it's gonna suck, dude.

    2. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by El · · Score: 1

      Yes, but for realism your reading of /. will have a 2-week latency...

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    3. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by GrAfFiT · · Score: 0

      You can have all the bandwidth you can eat, but, the simulated latency, it's gonna suck, dude.
      Ho shit, then no zero-gravity CounterStrike...

    4. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by GrAfFiT · · Score: 0

      Well at least i'm avoiding the /. effect.

    5. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yes, but for realism your reading of /. will have a 2-week latency...

      So while we're all reading dupes, he'll still be just getting the originals.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    6. Re:Given enough bandwidth... by metlin · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should send over John Carmack. With a rocket launcher ;)

      I hear he's good at those things.

  7. ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    six volunteers will depend on a preset limit of supplies, including about 5 tons of food and oxygen and 3 tons of water





    But how is that any different from regular russia?

    1. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shorter lines.

    2. Re:ummm... by temojen · · Score: 1

      no women.

    3. Re:ummm... by Jesrad · · Score: 3, Funny

      The bottled air is cleaner I hear.

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    4. Re:ummm... by DanteBlack · · Score: 4, Funny

      More food and water

      --
      I am invisble, and you can't see me.
    5. Re:ummm... by metlin · · Score: 1

      ...instead of Vodka :-(

    6. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be Perriair(tm) air bottle ?

    7. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Perrier is filtered tap water, I guess you're correct.

    8. Re:ummm... by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      > six volunteers will depend on a preset limit of supplies, including about 5 tons of food and oxygen and 3 tons of water

      But how is that any different from regular russia?

      In regular russia, the food and water consume YOU!!!

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    9. Re:ummm... by berns · · Score: 1

      like the Perrier scandal a couple of years ago... i wonder how many russian astronauts remember that one.

      --
      http://www.bernsonline.com/
    10. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says they all have to be male? If there is a female in that tube, I don't care how hot or ugly she is, in 500 days she will end up sleeping with someone.

    11. Re:ummm... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      In regular Russia, they're not volunteers

    12. Re:ummm... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      Not only can women be there, but non-Russians can volunteer. They may be hoping for mail-order American brides.

    13. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA. No women.

    14. Re:ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No women. RTFA.

  8. Supplies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5 tons of hershey bars
    3 tons of Jolt cola..

    1. Re:Supplies.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      5 tons of hershey bars
      3 tons of Jolt cola..

      And 490 days of playing d00m, quake and all other sorts of video games.

      "fragski, iz my turn take pictures of earth again? Bah!"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Supplies.. by Skinkie · · Score: 1

      They probably also simulate the network lag from being further from earth.
      But then again, a ultra-low powered PC+Flatscreen with Internet, why not :) Since stasis is not an option entertain the kids.

      --
      Support Eachother, Copy Dutch Property!
    3. Re:Supplies.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you do the math - 3 tons of water comes out to less than one quart of water per person per day:

      1 Gallons [US] = 8.3452641 Pounds
      6000 Pounds / 8.3452641 = ~718.97 gallons
      718.97 gallons / 6 people = ~119.83 gallons per person
      ~119.83 gallons per person / 500 days = ~0.23965 gallons per day (or a little less than one quart or 4 cups).

      I think I'll pass on that one thank you.

    4. Re:Supplies.. by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming once it's consumed it's gone. They'll probably recycle much of it.

    5. Re:Supplies.. by bursch-X · · Score: 2, Funny

      Leonid: "Ivan, dis waterr taste like piss"
      Ivan: "Wellll, you know..."

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  9. New on MTV Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is the true story of six volunteers, picked to live inside a capsule and have their lives taped to find out what happens when people stop being polite, and start being real. The Real Mars.

    1. Re:New on MTV Russia by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 1

      Naah... most of the reality shows center upon "who wins the prize, or how much they won" part -- as someone else said, there has to be a lot of "voting off" stuff to be there to be a reality hit.

      S

    2. Re:New on MTV Russia by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I don't remember any voting in The Real World- just a lot of illicit sex and gossiping behind people's backs.

      Then again, it wasn't exactly a hit....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:New on MTV Russia by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I don't like man on man action, and that's going to be their mistake. 500 days with 3 women and 3 men and well, oh wait. Okay, either the 3 men need to be sterile or the 3 women do. Unless they're simulating a colonization of mars.

    4. Re:New on MTV Russia by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Which sounds more plausible:

      "Would anyone like to volunteer for a little stint in a cramped fake space capsule for six months?" OR...

      "You've just been volunteered to spend the next six months in a cramped, fake, space capsule."

      I've always maintained that a volunteer is someone who hasn't understood the question.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    5. Re:New on MTV Russia by nizo · · Score: 1

      After a few days it would just degenerate into them sitting around in their underwear farting and scratching themselves all the time (what else is there for them to do with no women and no booze?) Actually in a way I guess that would be the most accurate reality show of all, since that is probably what the audience would be doing too.

    6. Re:New on MTV Russia by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Who said no women?

      who said no booze?

      Really, just because its "manned space flight" doesnt mean men only. We need our seven of nines and our t-pols.

      It would be more like Big Brother, with the loser each week being voted out of the airlock.

      Luckily on the first series, it will just be an isolated cold tundra, future series will use the vacuum of space to boost viewing figures.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    7. Re:New on MTV Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when have Russians been polite?

      Disclaimer: I am a Russian, so I know what I'm talking about.

    8. Re:New on MTV Russia by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      6 people can travel too Mars.

      But once they land, they discover that the return vehicle can only have one passenger.

      "5 people enter, one person leaves!"

    9. Re:New on MTV Russia by magarity · · Score: 1

      Who said no women?

      RTFA:
      Russian space researchers will lock six men in a metal tube for more than a year

      Note to mission planners: Comprise mission of equally mixed genders; must be complete hedonists with no emotional baggage between each other. Do NOT, repeat, do NOT send married couples if survival rate above 50% desired.

      As far as the reality TV idea goes, this is actually a pretty good one to get some commercial sponsorship. The first Mars rover paid for itself in toy merchandizing. A manned mission should at least get a fair percentage covered.

    10. Re:New on MTV Russia by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Where does, err, one volunteer? :)

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    11. Re:New on MTV Russia by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Funny
      And following the tradition of MTV 'Real World', the six choosen would be the following:
      1. A Chechnian Rebel
      2. A Hard Line Communist
      3. A 'liberal' reformer
      4. A Finn
      5. A Lithuanian
      6. A red army Soldier
    12. Re:New on MTV Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and with couples you could pay for the mission with adult toy merchandizing.

    13. Re:New on MTV Russia by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Your right, I thought I had rtfa as well!
      When I first read this (outside of slash) the version I read never mentioned men only, so I just glanced over it here.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    14. Re:New on MTV Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Born after an american way of life won in Russia, aren't you?

    15. Re:New on MTV Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing that most Finns only know how to say "Hands up" in russian, it might be fun to watch.

  10. Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by netsavior · · Score: 4, Funny

    oops I mean, no I didn't see that, nobody saw that movie

    1. Re:Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by raitchison · · Score: 1

      No I didn't see it either.

      I'm off to weez some juice.

      Or was that from Encino Man? (a different movie I didn't see)

    2. Re:Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by niczon · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they'll have to use recycled cigarette filters to fix their damaged air supply after having a wild party with Mock Martians.

    3. Re:Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by gphinch · · Score: 1

      Nothin to be ashamed of, BioDome was a totally radical movie bro.

      --
      in bed.
    4. Re:Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by tidge · · Score: 1

      the cheese is old and moldy

      where is the bathroom

    5. Re:Welcome to BioDome buuuuudy by Uncle+Jimmy · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the place I'm going to drain my lizzurrrrd!

  11. Good idea by s4m7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    better to find out now the likelihood of cosmonauts going nuts and killing each other when crammed in a tin for 500 days, than in the black depths of space.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:Good idea by DA-MAN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You think 100,000's bad, try having one in the 10,000's. . .

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    2. Re:Good idea by subl33t · · Score: 1

      In this case the cosmonauts should be replaced by Bush, Kerry and their seconds...

    3. Re:Good idea by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 1

      Valery Polyakov spend 438 days in space in a single continuous mission on the Mir space station from January 8, 1994 to March 22, 1995.

    4. Re:Good idea by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Offtopic it was, but I've got Karma to burn baby...

      Bring on the assault!

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
  12. Mocking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can mock it all they want. I still think it is a good idea! Damn rooskies.

  13. Human survival by usefool · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will this be a true test of human survial though?

    Since volunteers is allowed to quit the experiment if they develop a severe ailment or psychological stress, most likely they won't try hard enough to survive the journey.

    However in real life-and-death situation, people tend to do amazing things just to stay alive.

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Human survival by phreakmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Since volunteers is allowed to quit the experiment if they develop a severe ailment or psychological stress, most likely they won't try hard enough to survive the journey.

      I agree. Furthermore- the knowledge that you are "safe" if anything goes wrong will grossly affect your behavior. For instance, walk on a three inch wide beam that's resting on the ground. Most people can do it without even flinching. Now do the same thing suspended 20 feet above concrete.

      Since a lot of this experiement is to see how well the people cope with being in this environment with each other, I question some of the validity. I'm sure there is data that can be gathered, but I would imagine that most of that isn't long-term stuff. I'm betting that the further into the 500 day mission we get the less accurate the reflection of human behavior in that environment is going to be.

      Of course, if the whole idea is just to see how well the food, water, O2, &etc rationing works, then I stand corrected- but it seems that an extrapolation model based on a, oh, 150 day mission would be a little more reasonable. {shrug}

      -PM

    2. Re:Human survival by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The funny thing is that the latest National Geographic's Adventure contained a question from a hiker who had asked if he could train himself to have less water. The question was answered by a seasoned Everest explorer who also happened to be a doctor.

      Apparently, it does not make any difference because your body releases certain chemicals under those stressful situations that helps you adapt, and there is no way you can artificially force your body to release those. He also mentioned that while you may try living on a colder condition to prepare for an Arctic exploration or try living in hot weather to prepare yourself for a desert situation, your body's physical needs (water, food, etc) cannot really be altered that much.

      Those are largely dependent on food habits you were raised on, your body mass and a lot of other things. Can't seem to find the article online, though.

    3. Re:Human survival by KitFox · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is very accurate. The end results won't be accurate. When you KNOW that you have an out, your psyche isn't affected nearly the same.

      It can also happen the opposite of what you indicate. You say that they may not try hard enough to survive, and thus will succumb to the stress more easily. It may also REDUCE the stress, knowing that if you ever decide that you want out, you can get out, so you take things more with a grain of salt. No panic of knowing that if something goes wrong, you're utterly doomed.

      The downside is that doing a true test would involve putting peoples' lives in danger. Or at the VERY least, having a single blind test, in which the people going into it are absolutely convinced that reality says that if something goes wrong, nobody can save them. (You can still go in and save them, but they must have NO way of knowing that you can or will.)

      --

      @Whee

    4. Re:Human survival by usefool · · Score: 3, Interesting

      having a single blind test, in which the people going into it are absolutely convinced that reality says that if something goes wrong, nobody can save them.

      Ahhh.. that's actually possible, just send those volunteers in for a couple of days, then violently shake the facility, maybe some sparks and whatno, and inform them that the entrance's jammed tight, and "we are working on it" for the next 500 days :)

      --
      Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    5. Re:Human survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree. Furthermore- the knowledge that you are "safe" if anything goes wrong will grossly affect your behavior. For instance, walk on a three inch wide beam that's resting on the ground. Most people can do it without even flinching. Now do the same thing suspended 20 feet above concrete.
      I'm tired of hearing this argument. Try comparing one foot off the ground with twenty feet off the ground.
    6. Re:Human survival by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      It will be different, but it will also incrase our capabilities of risk management for those situations.

      .
      -shpoffo

    7. Re:Human survival by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Or put the whole pod underwater, and claim that the government hasn't given the funding for wetsuits or scuba gear....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Human survival by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      However in real life-and-death situation, people tend to do amazing things just to stay alive.

      I agree, but I don't think a Mars mission should rely on such things. It would be more prudent to make sure that it is possible to survive without needing to really dig deep into those kind of psychological resources. Then, you know that you still have them as a backup in case things go really wrong in unexpected ways.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    9. Re:Human survival by Toresica · · Score: 1

      Try comparing one foot off the ground with twenty feet off the ground.

      I've only got two feet. I can't hold twenty of them above the ground and still walk...

      All joking aside, good point. However, it is still harder to do something if there isn't a nice safety net below.

    10. Re:Human survival by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Since volunteers is allowed to quit the experiment if they develop a severe ailment or psychological stress, most likely they won't try hard enough to survive the journey.

      Kind of reminds me of the whole Biosphere fiasco, where eventually, they had to throw open the doors. I believe that there where also reports that participants where sneaking in and out, and that some of the females became pregnant.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    11. Re:Human survival by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work. In space there are no laws, but in Russia there are laws. They'd have to declare the tin can a no-law zone where ANYTHING goes. Want to murder someone? Go ahead, they wouldn't be able to be arrested though, otherwise it wouldn't simulate space.

    12. Re:Human survival by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      New rule, if you come out before 500 days, they will shoot you.

    13. Re:Human survival by plover · · Score: 1, Interesting
      the knowledge that you are "safe" if anything goes wrong will grossly affect your behavior

      Then tie a different incentive to the project.

      "You will be given honor, $1 million American dollars, and your family will be able to live in this nice house, and they will be fed and cared for by the government till the end of their days -- if you last all 500 days in the capsule.

      If you are kicked off or have to leave before the 500 days are up for any reason whatsoever (sickness, family crisis, national disaster), you will get no pay at all, you will be publicly shamed, your family will be evicted from the house, and you will be expected to pay the back rent."

      If you should happen to die while in the capsule, your comrades may elect to eject your body out the airlock. If this happens, your family will receive the same benefits as if you had lasted all 500 days.

      Carrots and sticks -- there's always incentive.

      --
      John
    14. Re:Human survival by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Plus you get to be the first human corpse in space.

    15. Re:Human survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey... I've already seen SeaLab 2021.

    16. Re:Human survival by Boronx · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about a double blind test where we don't know we can help them, either? That way there won'te be any subliminal, inadvertant tipoffs from researcher to subject.

    17. Re:Human survival by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      That is very accurate. The end results won't be accurate. When you KNOW that you have an out, your psyche isn't affected nearly the same.
      Many /.er's seem to be making the claim quoted above.. . And I have to say it's BS.

      I've been in a similiar situation, and guess what? The effect quoted above was utterly absent. This isn't a bunch of video game 'experts' in that tube, but a collection of (presumably) trained volunteers. As such, the mindset going in is very different, and the existence of an 'out' essentially doesn't occur to you.

    18. Re:Human survival by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Will this be a true test of human survial though?"

      Why should it be? It's a test to see if people can spend 500 days on Mars. If this test can't be passed without a MacGuyver in the group, then they should not be going to Mars. It's one thing if the situation turns sour causing survival instincts to kick in, it's another when the situation starts out that way.

      Don't get me wrong, I think you make a good point, I just don't see why, in this case, it has to be a test of Human survival ingenuity.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:Human survival by mikkom · · Score: 1

      > $1 million American dollars

      Just curious, why do you think that Russian would define their prizes in American dollars?

    20. Re:Human survival by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      Here's the article you mentioned:

      Ask Adventure

      I've heard that polar explorers can condition themselves to freezing temperatures before an expedition. If I'm desert bound, should I prepare for thirst by drinking less water? --Nicholas, St. Paul, Minnesota

    21. Re:Human survival by metlin · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you.

      That was indeed the one I was talking about.

    22. Re:Human survival by MacGod · · Score: 1

      OK, but look at this as a starting point. If the volunteers can withstand this, try a more hardcore, dangerous experiment with no help to sweep in and save the day. But if we find people crack under this pressure, we know that the tougher one is right out.

      You don't have to start at the hardest, most-likely-to-kill-each-other level. Work up to that.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    23. Re:Human survival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because right now US Dollar is a national currency in Russia. Sad but true.

    24. Re:Human survival by PrincipiaMathematica · · Score: 1

      On that note: around about 200 million people have managed to live in Russia, for quite a few years, without anyone coming in to save them.

      So why not Mars?

      --
      (:-L~
    25. Re:Human survival by plover · · Score: 1
      The stability of the currency. Even in its current rough shape, the American economy is still more stable than Russia's, and the dollar is more likely to hold its value over time.

      This used to be much more of an issue in Soviet Russia, where the rouble was not even accepted outside of the Soviet Union. My understanding is that U.S. currency was the preferred "hard" currency of the time; and even though it wasn't "legal" tender it was accepted in the black markets. I suppose today that the euro would probably be more amenable to the average Russian than a greenback, since it's pretty easy nowdays to pop over the border and spend it.

      So, if they instead promise their intrepid "tubeonauts" a million euros, or even the equivalent in roubles, will that make it enough of an incentive to last the 500 days?

      --
      John
    26. Re:Human survival by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
      OK, but look at this as a starting point. If the volunteers can withstand this, try a more hardcore, dangerous experiment with no help to sweep in and save the day. But if we find people crack under this pressure, we know that the tougher one is right out.

      You don't have to start at the hardest, most-likely-to-kill-each-other level. Work up to that.

      Sure... but a 500 day "easy" mission? Then what? another 500 day "harder" mission? By the time they're done with their testing they can call us on Mars and let us know they're coming. :-)

    27. Re:Human survival by drouse · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the experiment just needs some varients. We will use the first one as a control and then:

      A) Volunteers will be allowed to leave at night for nookie and beer, but only if they feel stressed.

      B) Volunteers will not be rescued if anything goes wrong.

      B) Volunteers will *all* be killed, one every 100 days.

      C) Volunteers will be told 500 days, researchers will open capsule at the 560 day mark.

      All experiments should involve tasks that might disgust or endanger the volunteers -- so we can look at how chance of rescue influences behavior.

      Hey! We can pay for it by making it a reality TV show!

      --
      -- I browse at +5 with stripped sigs ... Ha! Ha!
    28. Re:Human survival by danila · · Score: 1

      There is actually a short sci-fi story about exactly this problem. After a number of mock-up long-term mission the space command told two astronauts that the next one will be a max-realism simulation. Eventually the austronaut (the surviving one) found out that this must have been a real one. :) Sadly, I don't remember neither the title, nor the author.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  14. Heh ... by Poietes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read this as "Russian mocks Mars mission" and pictured Alexander Putin dancing around a table making fun a NASA scientist.

    "Oh yes, we land on Mars, yes, aren't we clever? I'm so clever with my MIT degree, I'm a clever little scientist. Those Americans think they're so smart with their advanced rocketry. It makes me so mad. Get me a vodka, Yuri."

    1. Re:Heh ... by El · · Score: 1

      Uh, isn't his name actually Vladimir Putin?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:Heh ... by metlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bah, once you unleash the power of the Awesome Russian Vodka (TM), Alexandar, Sasha, Dmitry, Vladimir are all one and the same.

      I mean, almost every other Russian guy I've known is either a Vladimir or a Dmitry or an Alexandar (Sasha). And boy, I know atleast 5 Russian women named Anastasia. Must be the Vodka, am sure.

    3. Re:Heh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget

      In soviet russia, Mars mocks you!

    4. Re:Heh ... by Poietes · · Score: 1

      No, no, Alexander Putin the president's cousin, author of The Putins Kin. Did you think I meant the president?

      No, I definitely meant Alexander. Definitely.

    5. Re:Heh ... by dynamo · · Score: 1

      And I read it as "Russians Mock Mars Mission" - as in, the Russians as a country are laughing their asses off at America's "president"'s brief mental sidetrack a while ago into sending americans to mars -- aka a sad attempt at diversion.

      Mars, bitches!

    6. Re:Heh ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know 'bout two americans and they both have Bush surname.
      When your presidents will be able talk clear and fluent in three languages except bullshit-english, we'll continue this barkling.

  15. I recall hearing about something like this by magefile · · Score: 4, Funny

    That happened maybe five years ago. Don't know what the duration was, though. I'm pretty sure it was only a few months.

    They could probably fund this by doing a reality TV show, heh. And if you RTFA, they say that no women will be allowed to volunteer - so it'll probably be just like a /.'ers every day life: no women, stuck in a tiny room in front of a computer screen, food in granola bar form (Oblig. Simpsons: "if you put food in bar form, you unleash it's awesome power"), no social contact, etc.

    1. Re:I recall hearing about something like this by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

      I can understand not wanting to have mixed groups, by day 100 all the women will be pregnant, by just before day 400 they'll be giving birth, and I doubt that there's a maternity ward on any spaceship pre-24th century.
      Particularly with all those cute Russian women, er, um, I didn't say that. The only other solution would be filling the 'women' slots with the likes of Ann Widecombe, but, alas, I fear the whole mission would never get off the ground.

      I see no politically correct reason why an all-female group couldn't go though. Politically incorrect (and probably just plain incorrect) reasons would include:
      -Women are physically weaker than men
      -Women are psychologically weaker than men
      -Women are stupid
      -The sheer weight of tampons/make-up/perfume/hair conditioner/exfoliating rub that would have to be added to the luggage
      -Not on Earth to make babies for the glory of the great soviet motherland, or something.

      As you see, there are myriad good reasons why men are better than women... (note to self: don't go into research, work for SCO instead, they like watertight arguments)

      Perhaps they should run simultaneous tests...

      --
      FGD 135
    2. Re:I recall hearing about something like this by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      I can understand not wanting to have mixed groups, by day 100 all the women will be pregnant, by just before day 400 they'll be giving birth, and I doubt that there's a maternity ward on any spaceship pre-24th century.
      IIRC birth control pills have been around since the sixties. And those work pretty good. (my gf hasn't yet been pregnant. At least I hope so. I'll know after the weekend. Yes, *that* time of the month. Sigh! Periods. Such a bloody waste of fucking time.)
  16. Dont be surprised by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you are not trampeled to death in the rush to volunteer for this.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Dont be surprised by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Why don't they just take six lifers from prison and actually launch them into space? That would be more accurate. We get to whatever failure condition occurs out to completion instead of the usless guesswork of extrapolation.

  17. Mocking Mars by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

    Mock not the Planet Mars,
    For it is large and red
    And contains the gateway to Hell!

    --
    "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    1. Re:Mocking Mars by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Why else do you think we're training legions of people to be skilled in battling the forces of the burning hells?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  18. Locked in a metal tube with a bunch of guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    including about 5 tons of food and oxygen and 3 tons of water . . . . .Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers.

    Doesn't sound terribly exciting . . . No prOn?

  19. Male only by usefool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers.

    Geezz I wonder why. And they'll probably get a similar result just by looking into any male-only student flat :)

    --
    Uselessful technology (Air-Charged
    1. Re:Male only by csimpkin · · Score: 1

      I imagine there a concerns about how much room is available. Have you ever seen a woman pack for a weekend? Could you imagine how many suitcases would be needed for 500 days?

    2. Re:Male only by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't sexual withdrawal present itself as an issue? It's a normal part of life - not for us nerds, though - and should be factored into the equation. Or hell, the men will resort to homosexuality. Problem solved. Disregard my post.

    3. Re:Male only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No women! That's terrible. Everyone knows that Mars needs women.

    4. Re:Male only by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

      Minus the empty pizza boxes, but pretty much, yeah.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    5. Re:Male only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 straight religous guy's and one gay russian sailor!

    6. Re:Male only by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      They're going to put 6 men in there, and get back 3 couples. :)

      The Navy. Where 400 men go out, and 200 couples come back.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:Male only by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Paraphrasing from Neil Stepehson:

      Don't get me wrong, they're het. It's just that after being out at sea so long, they'll go after anything warm and concave, you know?
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  20. What will the volunteers do? by rmadhuram · · Score: 1

    but what are they going to DO for 500 days?? There would probably be no experiments to run in the mock capsule..

    1. Re:What will the volunteers do? by GrAfFiT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Trying not to kill each others or get killed by some buggy onboard computer would be a good start.

    2. Re:What will the volunteers do? by Homology · · Score: 1
      but what are they going to DO for 500 days?? There would probably be no experiments to run in the mock capsule..

      They proably will spend alot of time just to keep things running smoothly, besides their experiments. On a real Mars mission, the participants will be highly trained, and most (if not all) of them will have PhD. Boredom will be a serious issue, and so will the noise level.

    3. Re:What will the volunteers do? by DeathoP · · Score: 1

      I'd take a Gameboy Advance and all the games (RPGs mostly) I could carry. I'm sure I'd need some other source of power besides the Li-Ion battery. I'd have to take an extension cord for the tests and find some sort of "solar gba power adapter" for actual space travel. ...oh, and headphones for even more isolation.

      -C. Kessel

    4. Re:What will the volunteers do? by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well they're Russian, so they'll probably get drunk, and then after a long time of being around no women, they'll start making out.

    5. Re:What will the volunteers do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to american males who will not need alcohol at all to start fucking each other.

  21. In Soviet Russia... by scoser · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...Mars mocks you!

  22. It's the biodome by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's the biodome, the biodome. The BIO DOOOOOOOOME.
    yak.

    Really, who wants to do it for 500 days?

    What if the other volunteers are hot chicks?

    1. Re:It's the biodome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously didn't read the article.

    2. Re:It's the biodome by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Actually I did, but I just couldn't find anything better to say, it reminded me of that stupid Biodome movie with Pauly Shore.

  23. reality tv by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, this would make a good reality tv show, and maybe even gather public support for a mission...

    However, in space, I don't know how well being "voted off" would go over...

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
    1. Re:reality tv by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Oh, c'mon, that's not a problem. Instead of injecting them into space, you just eat them. That solves the problem of food in space. The last person to remain will use the penultimate player as a lifeboat once they land back on earth. It literally writes itself!

    2. Re:reality tv by aurb · · Score: 1

      Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers. I don't think it would make an interesting TV show...

  24. make sure there ain't by ndrtkr · · Score: 1

    no one in the team lastnamed *betruger*... he might bring DooM on earth instead of mars...

    --
    - live from Costa Rica !
    1. Re:make sure there ain't by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      " no one in the team lastnamed *betruger*... he might bring DooM on earth instead of mars..."

      Don't worry, we got lots of Swann and Cambell =)

  25. Other deprivations? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In addition to the limited supplies of food, air, and water, I would think the experiment would want to mimic the other deprivations the crew might experience on the way to and from Mars. Most notably, I'd think, they'd want to emulate the lengthening communications lag between Mission Control and the "ship". Start with the sort of glitch experienced in orbit, and drag it out to the full 6-10 minutes.

    Also, you'd want to make the communication link have a realistic bandwidth. Whatever is the state of the art at "launch" is what they're stuck with for the duration of the trip.

    Now, if this were an episode of "Survivor: Mars", you'd throw in a monkey wrench... maybe a Galileo-style communications system error, where their phat pipe gets cut down to 300 baud, and the men fight over which supermodel pr0n picture to download each week.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Other deprivations? by mschiller · · Score: 1

      You mean what was State of the Art ten years before launch don't you?

      Even if the Government pushes the state of the art in the design phase, by the time Government get's around to fully funding, building, and deploying the item in question the technology is 5-10 years old...

    2. Re:Other deprivations? by EinarH · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Some keywords on stuff that can seriously fuck up ones mood; artificiall light, constantly flashing/blinking light, random blackouts, rationed power, damaged food, long and boring repairs in the scheduled sleeping time and loss of even the most basic entertainment.
      And don't forget uncertainity like telling them halfway through the experiment that the government must cut the space budget and decided to start with the sallaries for the 500 days project.
      Random change in mission plans and procedures are also classics.

      Fun for the people planning the exercise though..

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    3. Re:Other deprivations? by b1scuit · · Score: 1
      And even if they could spec actual state of the art equipment for the trip, would you trust it? I damn sure wouldn't. I'd want equipment that had crappy bandwidth but was also nearly bulletproof as opposed to whatever new cuteness was available on launch day that might flake out in the 17th month.

      I'd be worried if they weren't spec'ing decade old hardware.

    4. Re:Other deprivations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is only the initial anouncement. My guess is they will incorporate the communications delay and many other things as we progrss to 2006.

    5. Re:Other deprivations? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      like, put some nerds on there?

      and then they'll start bitching at one point of the hell of a lag their irc has.

      seriously though.. bring a laptop and couple of game programming books.. fun for everyone and no time wasted!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Other deprivations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but can you bring enough batteries to keep the laptop powered through 500 days?

    7. Re:Other deprivations? by SiggyRadiation · · Score: 1

      Communications error?!? You mean, like;

      VOICE OF BILL GATES COMING FROM LAPTOP
      Hello, Boris, can I have a word with you?

      BORIS WALKS TO THE
      COMPUTER.

      BORIS
      Yes, MS-MarsMockup, what's up?

      MS-MarsMockup
      It looks like we have another bad A.O. unit. My FPC shows another impending failure.
      --
      This unique sig is intended to make this user more recognisable.
    8. Re:Other deprivations? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'd want equipment that had crappy bandwidth but was also nearly bulletproof as opposed to whatever new cuteness was available on launch day that might flake out in the 17th month.

      Um, 500/30 is only 16.6... So there's no 17th month problems at all to be expected.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Other deprivations? by b1scuit · · Score: 1

      Because, you know, these things always hum along right on schedule.

  26. Hmmmm by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    make it 3 tons of Vodka and I'll go.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:Hmmmm by unixbugs · · Score: 0

      how about 3 tons of Hustler Magazine...

      --
      You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
    2. Re:Hmmmm by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a joke. Three astronauts are going to spend 2 years on a space station, and are allowed to bring 120 pounds of personal cargo with them. The American astronaut brings his 115 pound wife, the Japaneese astronaught brings 119 pounds of math and physics textbooks, and the russian astronaut brings 120 pounds of fine cuban cigars. Two years later when they return, the american and his wife get out of the spaceship with their new baby daughter. The Japaneese astronaut gets off with a notebook full of new theoritical physics equations. The Russian comes off the ship and yells "DOES ANYONE HAVE A FREAKING MATCH???"

    3. Re:Hmmmm by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      make it 3 tons of Vodka and I'll go

      Make it 3 tons of Vodka, and all of Russia would go..

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    4. Re:Hmmmm by tftp · · Score: 1

      Well, even assuming that the cigar dude is too dumb to think on his own, why couldn't he ask the Japanese physics genius to make some fire? :-)

    5. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Two years later when they return, the american and his wife get out of the spaceship with their new baby daughter.
      Daughter was half asian, right? Because no Russian will want to fuck 115 pound American woman.
    6. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they bring 3 tons of McDonalds food all of America will go too.

  27. Ooh! Alliteration! by physicsphairy · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Many merry migrant mynocks mock mock Russian mars mission management.

    Sorry... English class really messes with your head.

    1. Re:Ooh! Alliteration! by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      Try this:

      Many merry migrant mynocks mock Muscovite mock mars mission management.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Ooh! Alliteration! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost always avoid annoying alliterations!

  28. less water than food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 tons of water but 5 tons of food? hmm... something seems wrong.

    1. Re:less water than food? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya.. where's the vodka?

    2. Re:less water than food? by b1scuit · · Score: 1

      You can't recycle food. I mean, even if you could, would you want to?

    3. Re:less water than food? by ctime · · Score: 1

      Someone, obviously, hasn't seen the Lion King. I eat other animals poop every day; atleast that's what the movie insinuates. In Addition, I eat my own poop.

    4. Re:less water than food? by b1scuit · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that should have read: You can't recycle food without a planet.

  29. This has been done before ... sort of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it didn't work that well. The original Biosphere tried to create a totally self-contained environment that would support life. I don't remember how long it lasted but there were lots of problems.

    What scares me is that to be on the safe side, the mission should have a lot of redundancy. I bet they don't get it.

    http://www.bio2.edu/

    1. Re:This has been done before ... sort of by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      This is completely different. The biodome was about creating a self sustaining ecosystem. There is no such goal here. It's just "Can they budget their food and live with the stress".

      Lot of redudency is not needed at all.

  30. No Women? by oborseth · · Score: 1

    "Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers." This will fail.

    1. Re:No Women? by wibs · · Score: 1

      "Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers." This will fail.

      Because we all know that Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins were actually female. That's the real lunar landing government coverup - they all had sexchange operations in transit to ensure the mission's success.

      --
      If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
  31. Buuuddyyy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll give 2 to 1 odds against that Pauly Shore is a volunteer, to promote his new movie, "B2: Biodome", the second in his masterpiece trilogy.

  32. Why is it men only? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recall reading sometime ago that US Navy studies for crewing submarines showed women coped much better will prolonged living in confined quarters than men do and an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Why is it men only? by metlin · · Score: 1

      It's the woman helping woman thing, trust me. You know? When they have that time of the month and stuff, it's easier for a woman to "emphathise" and provide certain types of support, that you know, we all see in those nice reality shows.

      Right, boys?

    2. Re:Why is it men only? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      It'll also make for happier participants.

    3. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And make for a great plot for a porno.

    4. Re:Why is it men only? by Raindance · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is quite a difference between a study showing that women coped much better in living in confined quarters for a prolonged period of time, and your assertion that "an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew."

      I don't have the foggiest whether women or men would work better in this, personally, but I'd like to make the point that better individual psychological reactions to confined quarters don't strongly imply better homogeneous group reactions to confined quarters.

      RD

    5. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's true, could you imagine the hot lesbian sex after a few months.

    6. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *gulp*

      In Soviet Russia, lesbian sex comes to YOU!

      ~m

    7. Re:Why is it men only? by ctime · · Score: 5, Funny

      In related news, an all female crew with the sole addition of one male counter part resulted in the highest rated moral ever encountered by the Armed Forces. I, for one, welcome our all female crew ovarylords.

    8. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone else seen the all-female teams on reality tv, whoever said that an all-women crew would be better is obviously dilusional, or a feminist (no wait, thats the same thing)

      Coward, A.

    9. Re:Why is it men only? by Orne · · Score: 1

      What you are insinuating will occur between the mixed-sex crewmates is hardly high morals ... however, the morale of the crew would be quite high.

    10. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew."

      It's morale , you NSMF. In no way do females in general have a higher moral standard than men (and vice versa).

    11. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think i saw some anime about that once.

    12. Re:Why is it men only? by Ablar · · Score: 5, Funny
      In related news, an all female crew with the sole addition of one male counter part resulted in the highest rated moral ever encountered by the Armed Forces. I, for one, welcome our all female crew ovarylords.

      Just wait until the womens' cycles synch up, they all have PMS at once, and the poor guy has nowhere to run...

    13. Re:Why is it men only? by marko123 · · Score: 1

      In Australia, I heard that when two women were first included in a submarine tour, they were at each other's throats. They now put more than two on one sub (more like six because the bed compartments are in groups of six)

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    14. Re:Why is it men only? by sielwolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      This was a popular research result (so much that Crichton borrowed it in Sphere). The problem: much of the evidence was ancedotal. The teams were asked their opinions. The men were blunt about their situation, the women put up a unified front. When later tests were done on performance it turned out that the men, though overt in their bickering, worked just as well as women.

      There is a parallel in Rosalind Wiseman's Queen Bees and Wannabes (the basis of much of Tina Fey's Mean Girls): most of the research into [junior]+ high school bullying dealt with boys. Because the boys were open about it, more willing to make an issue of it. The girls, both victims and victimizers, concealed their activities, often in passive-aggressive ways (causing many sociologists to assume it wasn't there). Girls would bond into groups that, when asked, would uniformly reply with "best friends forever" to researchers. Observation noted that this was not the case. There were obvious social heirarchies (even among "friends") where the lower girls were humiliated, and nettled endlessly.

      Of course this all just showed that the sexes approaches to group dynamics were different, not better. Both have members who demonstrate all the sort of behaviors you don't want in a closed space (depression, group disruptive behavior, passive-aggressiveness, etc).

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    15. Re:Why is it men only? by magefile · · Score: 1

      They covered something like that in Crichton's book Sphere - that groups of 3 are inherently unstable, 'cuz someone's always left out of the alliances. That's actually true, not just something he made up.

    16. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least until they synch.

    17. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall reading sometime ago that US Navy studies for crewing submarines showed women coped much better will prolonged living in confined quarters than men do and an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew

      Great excuse to be cheap and make your significant other live in a small box. "But honey women are better at living in cramped little hovels!".

    18. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmph, like women could be astronauts.

    19. Re:Why is it men only? by dcam · · Score: 1

      ... an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew

      Unquestionably, particularly as women tend to be more moral than men.

      --
      meh
    20. Re:Why is it men only? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      I recall reading sometime ago that US Navy studies for crewing submarines showed women coped much better will prolonged living in confined quarters than men do and an all female submarine crew would probably have higher moral than an all male crew.

      Yeah but you'd be able to pinpoint the sub underwater by the strength of the sound of bitching and backstabbing emanating from the hull.

      Men just try to kill each other under stress, women let the venom for each other ripen in the cauldron of their black, black hearts - that poison never goes away.

    21. Re:Why is it men only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! *high five*

    22. Re:Why is it men only? by fraxinus-tree · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the womens' cycles synch up, they all have PMS at once, and the poor guy has nowhere to run..

      nothing new. Most women are at full moon or at empty moon anyways.

  33. Memory problems by Engineer-Poet · · Score: 1
    He seems to have conflated Vladimir Putin and Alexander Pushkin.

    (Hey, they're both Russian, they all look the same from the USA right? Dead poet, live almost-dictator, can't be bothered with trivial distinctions.)

  34. Re:Obligatory: "In Soviet Russia..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory: RTFcomments

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1255 56 &cid=10518263

  35. Could it be? by MacFury · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Gee, I know what would be clouding my thoughts every minute if I were stuck in a confined space for prolonged periods of time without any women around...

    I don't think women are as...driven...

    And no jokes about me not getting any. I have a gf :-)

    1. Re:Could it be? by eln · · Score: 1

      And no jokes about me not getting any. I have a gf :-)

      Let me guess...she lives in Canada, and I wouldn't know her?

    2. Re:Could it be? by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      If you mean sexually then i think you are wrong, you havn't met the right women yet.;)

    3. Re:Could it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me guess...she lives in Canada, and I wouldn't know her?
      Well, my girlfriend lives in Canada, and you wouldn't know her. But then, I also live in Canada and you wouldn't know me. Welcome to the Internet.
    4. Re:Could it be? by FurryFeet · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no jokes about me not getting any. I have a gf

      You misspelled "gif". And we all have LOTS of them.

  36. Since we get so much programming from overseas... by comrade009 · · Score: 0

    How long until TV Execs figure out how to make this a reality show. Chills, thrills, and exciting chemical spills, it's all on Survivor: Mars!

  37. Flying cum in zero gravity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like, ewww, dude. You DON'T want pr0n in that setting.

    1. Re:Flying cum in zero gravity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if I'm a fucking faggot who likes big fat things up my ass, you insensitive clod.

  38. new members by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    1. Re:new members by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to tell me if you find out. I'd fucking sign up for that.

      Shit, imagine having "Survived 500 days in isolation for the Russian Space Program" in your CV.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  39. No suprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that russia would think of this, because Americans always have to be "politically correct" it oftens halts progress. cough stem cell research cough. Keeping people in metal tubes, volunteers are not, would never be allowed/considered ethical, in the us.

    1. Re:No suprise by Peyna · · Score: 1

      You mean something like this?

      --
      What?
  40. Day 14 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Day 14 in the Bolshoi Komrade House, and Gregori has been getting to grips with failing last nights challange, the effect of martain gravity on plant life... as a result the Bolshoi Komrade team have only 16 rubels to spend on food and water supplies this week.

  41. more than a year! by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    Russian space researchers will lock six men in a metal tube for more than a year in [...] The 500 Days experiment...

    That's closer to "one and a half years" than "more than a year".

    Is it so bad with the post-MTV generation that they can't cope with something happening in the future? *ducks*

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  42. The worst part... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
    Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers.

    That's probably for the best, as they are not equipped to handle childbirth, but that's gonna be one mighty lonely metal tube.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:The worst part... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, women are equipped to handle childbirth. Well, more so than men, anyhow.

  43. Obligatory ISR joke by Dirtside · · Score: 0, Troll

    According to the article, in Soviet Russia, Mars missions mock you.

    Alternatively, in Capitalist America, uh... Mars missions are real? No, that can't be right...

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  44. Oh, goodness, not another one... by BarakMich · · Score: 1

    In the US, they'd make it a reality TV show.

    Then again, could this be a means to an end? Help out NASA by making "Mars Survivor" and
    a) testing the feasibility of people living on Mars
    b) donating some money from advertising revenue?

  45. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Mars mission mocks you.

  46. Communism on Mars by unixbugs · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Experiment participation is not solely reserved for Russian volunteers, institute officials added."

    Also included will be non-volunteers.

    Brings a whole new meaning to the term "The Red Planet".

    --
    You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  47. title jumble by scottking · · Score: 1

    anyone else read that title and think, "the russians are making fun of the mars mission?" ?

    --
    scott king
    1. Re:title jumble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was an http://theonion.com/ article.

      I too thought the Russians were mocking our Mars Mission.

  48. Where do I apply? by benchbri · · Score: 1
    I'd like to know where to apply for this. In 2006, I'll be a year out of school, and this seems like a great way to defer paying back my student loans for a year and a half.

    Even though I'd be crammed in a concrete bloc(oh, there's a pun!) shed for a year and a half, with 5 other guys, and after a week probably only rasin-toilet wine to drink, I'd still go. I've been wanting to go to the Aumandson-Scott reaserch station to work over the winter, but my future career probably precludes that. Might as well donate my body/time to space exploration. I doubt they'd have to pay me.

    Anyone who wants me, knows where to contact me....

  49. The current record by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    You'd have to be pretty dedicated to simply give up over a year of your life to live in a cramped environment with bad food, no privacy and not even get you cosmonaut wings at the end.

    According to the arictle, Valery Polyakov (Russian, of course) holds the current record for the longest continuous time in space with 438 days aboard the Mir. That's pretty darn close.

  50. I misread the headline: by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    I wasn't the first one who misread the headline, and thought the Russians were making fun of our Mars mission.

    Which really, they have a right to do. I mean, what is a year or so in a tiny capsule, with only a little bit of food stuck in the cold dark depths of space? How is that different from living in a utilitarian concrete 50s era apartment in Archangelsk?

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  51. Red Rover by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The Russian space program has come a long way down from its threat to bury us with ICBMs, the first satellite and animals in space, and the "no problem" attitude of decades of the Mir space station. Now if they could just retool their "nested wooden dolls" technology...

    But maybe this is all a trick to distract us from their takeover of the rest of the solar system, while we're obsessed with landing on a planet that apparently was too hostile to life, if it ever existed there? They've got solar sails, and they're working on surviving in an ark. Maybe they know something we don't?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  52. Politcal Candidates Allowed? by notcreative · · Score: 1

    May I suggest Dubya, who wants to go to Mars anyway?

  53. Obligatory ISR joke... by Elyjah · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, Mars Mission Mocks YOU!

    1. Re:Obligatory ISR joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, that joke has been said half a dozen times already with that exact same wording and everything. Let's remember the karma-whore rules...

      1) if copying a post that already exists because you think it's insightful or funny or whatever, remember to post your copy in a thread near the top of the page so people see it first and think the other one is the imposter.

      2) if you're going to copy a post, be sure to check who you're copying it from. If you're copying it from half a dozen anonymous cowards, the joke probably isn't very good to begin with.

      Seriously. Be original, or be funny, but don't be unoriginal and unfunny.

  54. No vodka by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    and no lines for the food!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No vodka by ralphcringely · · Score: 1

      Food lines went away about 5 yrs ago. >

      --
      Tell me again, who knew Mary was a virgin, and how did they know?
  55. Fox Counters with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Survivor Mars

  56. How relevant? by HappyRonin · · Score: 1

    I wonder how relevant this really is, having some significant differences to a real Mars trip?

    * Stressors related to truly being at risk are not present

    * Non of the hassles of prolonged weightlessness (eating, excreting, loss of bone density/muscle mass, etc)

    * Motivation of doing something truly bold/adventurous is lacking. Pretending to go to Mars is not going to Mars. Once we go, who is going to remember the crew of the pretend mission?

    Not trying to disparage the project, but I'm thinking we've gathered more relevant data from extended stays on MIR and the ISS

    1. Re:How relevant? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Actually, you just answered your own question. All three of those things have been tested excessively on space station missions, like SkyLab, MIR, and the ISS. What hasn't been tested to any relevant extent (relevant to such a potential mission) is the interaction of human beings in a confined space. The psychological aspect is very important in something like this, if not paramount.

  57. Effects of weightlessness? by rmadhuram · · Score: 1

    Weightlessness would have psychological and physiological effects on humans: http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/SP-4026/ noord28.html I wonder how these effects can be incorporated in the results of this experiment.

  58. Russia Mocks Mars mission? by rleibman · · Score: 1

    Man, I read the title all wrong. Why would Russia be mocking the mars missing? What's funny about it?

  59. In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Slashdotters mark this message as -1 Troll.

  60. Mars Society seems much more practical to me by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    While it might be a nice stunt, I really feel like Zubrin's Mars Society is going about the whole mars station research thing in a much more realistic fashion.

    They have much shorter missions, but they also try a lot more things to see what works. What kinds of suits work, what tools work with the suits, what kind of mobity wrks best for exploration, what crew mixtures work best. Even what kinds of toilets work best! Those are the kind of nuts-and-bolts things you really need to know to maximize chance for succces in a Mars mission.

    The Russian effort is just another Bioshpere, how much was really learned there?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Mars Society seems much more practical to me by kippy · · Score: 1

      I'm a member of TMS but I'm glad that the Russians are doing this because TMS really cannot. Don't get me wrong, I'm a dues paying member but this is quite a bit different from TMS activities.

      The MDRS missions are great for simulating certain aspects of a Mars mission on the ground but what they haven't done is lock 4-6 people in a studio apt for 8 months to see if they tear each other apart. The cramped living conditions with nowhere to go is probably one of the biggest obstacles to overcome on a manned mission.

      Since TMS is volunteer, they are unlikely to find even a couple people who are able to carve 8 months out of their lives to sit in a tuna can. What the Russians are doing here is an invaluable proof of concept.

  61. Mod him up! by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    So while we're all reading dupes, he'll still be just getting the originals.

    It's funny because it's true.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  62. BioSphere III by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

    Does anybody else think this sounds kind of like a repeat of the Biosphere experiments? Except with less living space and fewer windows...

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
  63. Americans have already tried something like this.. by jangobongo · · Score: 1

    ...the Biosphere 2 in Tucson, AZ.

    The experiment, under management of Columbia University, was for a group of eight men and women to live for two years in a sealed environment, growing their own food and recycling their water, with no outside supplies. They couldn't make it all the way through without fresh supplies and all the participants lost a lot of weight during their two-year stint.

    Quote from wikipedia: "Despite expenditure of over $150 million, this attempt at a new biosphere [could] not sustain eight humans, [even] for a limited time..."

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
  64. Russian "Mock Mars" Mission by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    Yes, that's right, Russian comedians will spend over 16 months shouting things such as:

    "Ha! Mars has such a wispy atmosphere!"

    "Lenin and Stalin could make a better Red planet than that... and they're dead!"

    "You call that an ice cap?"

    "You couldn't support life anymore even if your life depended on it!"

    "I wouldn't touch Mars with a 10-foot Pole!"

    "Martians drink American vodka!"

    "Even Afghanistan was nicer than Mars!"

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:Russian "Mock Mars" Mission by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Geez, man, you call that humour? Where's the "In Soviet Russia, Mars explores YOU!!!" joke?

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
  65. Biosphere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, the Biosphere in Arizona anyone?

  66. Memories... by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ah man, this story brings back good memories for me.
    When I was about, oooh 14 years old or so, I went to a "Space and Science Camp" one summer. We did all sorts of crazy stuff related to space. My favorite was trying to design "crash modules" to protect an egg from a two story drop (that was hella fun).

    Anyways, one of the special activities we did was a mock Moon base mission. Basically we spent one day cutting black garbage bags open and duct taping them together into a series of domes and tunnels for our "base". It had two openings: one was a sealable flap (our "airlock") and the other was an open hole that they put a big fan in to inflate the entire structure (worked really well too). Oh and some small ventillation holes in each room. Anyways, the next day we went on our "mission", which was basically a dozen or more of us stuck inside this inflated garbage bag, in the middle of a gymnasium with the lights turned off. We were divided up into teams and everyone given certain tasks. I was a communications officer, which basically ment I got to sit there and communicate with "earth" (our supervisors) on an old macintosh. We were also responsible for general coordination of the base. Another team was our Medical branch. They had some generic tests/experiments to try while we were 'on the moon', in addition to being responsible for the health of the entire staff. Theirs was actually the only 'serious' mission, because they had to test everyone regularly for signs of CO2 poisioning while we were effectively trapped inside a plastic bag for six hours straight. We also had an exploration team that got to do "moonwalks", which was basically tying a rope around one guy, blindfolding him, and shoving him out into the gymnasium to see what he could find. They came in very important (more later). The only other team I remember was our "Engineering" team, who was responsible for maintaining the base's structure, armed with nothing but some spare garbage bags, some knives, and enough duct tape to wrap an army. They even got around to making a couple of small additions to the base. Those guys had lots of fun.

    The cool thing about our "mission" was, in addition to trying to complete the tasks given to us by Earth base, our supervisors fucked with us at every possible opportunity. They did shit like "solar activity disrupting communications" (disconnected our Mac from the LAN) so we were on our own for an hour. They walked around with knives and poked holes in the bags to keep the engineering team busy... VERY busy. When we were done, our base looked like someone had taken a piece of swiss cheese and put tape over all the holes. They were cruel. About 20 minutes after our engineering team completed a tunnel connecting medical to communications, I hear this slicing sound and feel air rushing past my face. I turn around, and the bastards had cut a three foot gap in the new tunnel! Engineering runs over and starts trying to tape it up, but its not gonna be airtight... so the creative bastards rip off their paper medical jumpsuits (we even had mission stickers, names, rank, etc on them) and use them to seal off the tunnel. Heh that was cool. Even cooler though, was when the "alien" got into our base through the same gap. One of the engineering guys opened up the tunnel to see about further repairs, and he finds the supervisors have slashed it (AGAIN!) and dumped a plastic turtle in the gap as an "alien". The whole base erupts in panic. Engineering shows up in force as they're the only ones with knives. Medical runs in and tries to start bossing people around because "this is a biological matter". It was hillarious. We eventually figured out (with Earth's help) that the alien was dead, and medical got the goahead to start an autopsy on it. Very cool.

    By far the most exciting event in the mission was our "catastrophic power failure". Everyone's working allong happilly... computers chirping, people talking, fans humming... and then no humming. People kind of looked around at eachother real slowly like "Uhh, wa

    1. Re:Memories... by magefile · · Score: 1

      Damn, that sounds like fun. What's the upper age limit to attend? (I can't be the only one thinking that).

    2. Re:Memories... by CaptainAvatar · · Score: 1

      Outstanding, you were one lucky little geek! I would have killed to go to something like that when I was a kid ...

      --
      The real Captain Avatar is a fictional character, so I suppose he doesn't mind if I impersonate him.
    3. Re:Memories... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I remember doing that too, way back in the mid 80s, but my experience was a little more intense.

      We actually got to go into the real shuttle to sit in the cockpit during an engine test. During the test, there was some "computer error" or something (I'm a little fuzzy on the details), which made it appear there was a malfunction, and the people at mission control had to actually launch us into space.

      I don't remember much about it, since I was a little kid and I've had a lot to drink since 1986, but there was something about a gay robot and having to tell this annoying kid to "use the force" in order to save everyone's life.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    4. Re:Memories... by standsolid · · Score: 1

      What's the upper age limit to attend? (I can't be the only one thinking that)

      well... you might be...

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    5. Re:Memories... by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Man - I saw that when I was a kid... did I ever want to go to camp the next summer! But my inner geek told me not to be silly (being a geek while young cuts down on some day-dreaming) so I started going to /. instead. *sighs and increases bandwidth payments*

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    6. Re:Memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn, that sounds like fun. What's the upper age limit to attend? (I can't be the only one thinking that).

      You have people who run around on weekends bashing each other over their heads with plastic swords. You mean you can't get a bunch of people to play Mars base for a few hours?

    7. Re:Memories... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Gosh, that was like seven years ago! I don't quite recall. I think the oldest guys we had around were only like 16 or 17. The youngest was 12 I think. Most kids were around my age at the time, eg 14-15. It was just some goofy "space camp" that the local observatory/science museum put on. I doubt they even run the program anymore. But it was definitly one of my favorite summer camps ever. :)

      The only other one that comes close was a loooong time ago at some university. I don't even recall what the camp was about, I just remember it was the very first time i'd seen work from or heard of a little tiny company known as "Pixar". I think that was the moment, watching a little red lamp play with a beachball, that I knew I wanted to do digital art and animation. :)

      Anyways, yeah sorry I can't really answer your question accurately. If you're really interested, maybe check out what your locale has to offer for your age group. Maybe you'll find something that you really like. Good luck!

    8. Re:Memories... by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't even know how lucky I was at the time.

      Of course, it wasn't MY doing. I chalk it up to being a hyperactive young child with two parents working full time to support the familly. Every summer, mom would just throw me into like half a dozen different camps to act as a babysitter while school was out. Some of them sucked. Others were good. This one was probably the best. :)

    9. Re:Memories... by magefile · · Score: 1

      Heh, it was more of a joke than anything else ... I realize I'm beyond that age. And I, too remember my first exposure to animating/modeling software. Are you doing digital art and animation now? I'm thinking that's a possible career once I've graduated.

  67. Bitch fignt anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is the reason for no females

  68. Then again... by Ghostgate · · Score: 1

    You'd have to be pretty dedicated to simply give up over a year of your life to live in a cramped environment with bad food, no privacy

    Then again, if you still live with your parents, there's not really a whole lot of difference.

  69. Methods for doing this; Russia good as any place by justanyone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought about this concept for a while.

    It seems likely that a significant fraction of a prolonged Mars mission would be spent inside a habitat building. That building would be functionally isolated from the outside. Also, simulating the trip there and back would also be valuable.

    I would like to suggest a mineshaft. Several parallel shafts could be used to monitor the progress of the team and provide emergency egress (exits).

    If the shaft were dug in a suitably solid rock, it could be sprayed with concrete, then some kind of waterproofing plastic compound. This would seal it and allow good simulation of water and air consumption. Other options, like "sealed" metal containers, might be more expensive to construct, but it's another option.

    Food, other consumables, oxygen, water, yes, these are valid simulations. I'd also like to see what the options are for running a hydroponics lab to oxygenate the air and cleanse sewer waste, though not to eat necessarily since this would involve a fair amount of work.

    Just some ideas. Biodome was obviously a learning process from the "sealed in" perspective and from the biodiversity perspective as well. I just wonder if there's a lower tech method for doing this experiment, and if so, I have confidence that the "plucky" Russian improvisational character stereotype is up to the challenge.

  70. Must stop misreading titles by Vornzog · · Score: 1
    Or maybe the titles should be better written. I was sure that said 'Russians Mock Mars Mission'.

    "Stupid Americans, going to Mars. If they want cold and barren, they should just go to Siberia. At least they have vodka in Siberia."
    <obl. quote>In Soviet Russia, Mars missions mock YOU.</obl. quote>
    Er, sorry for that. I'll stop now.
    --

    -V-

    Who can decide a priori? Nobody.
    -Sartre

  71. Entertianment by Rip+Van+Winkle · · Score: 1

    What the hell are these people going to do when they've watched their porn DVDs to death?

    I wonder if this is going to be like biosphere where they get their weekly allocation of Macdonalds!

    --

    Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are not the responsiblity of the user, as I probably stole them anyway
  72. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by magefile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this will have a better chance of success than Biodome. First, because of funding, second because we're not worried about total internalization/sealed-in-ness, just for extended periods (500 days for now, maybe longer later) - so we're not worried about, say, jettisoning waste, or not stocking a food supply of a certain type because, "it'll run out after 2 years anyway".

  73. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by randomiam · · Score: 3, Informative
    Food, other consumables, oxygen, water, yes, these are valid simulations. I'd also like to see what the options are for running a hydroponics lab to oxygenate the air and cleanse sewer waste, though not to eat necessarily since this would involve a fair amount of work.

    NASA ran a demonstration project called "Breadboard" starting back in '86. It's still active, I think. The goal of the project were to:

    1.) Develop a sealed environment plant growth capability (which is much harder than simple hydroponic farming).

    2.) Develop the systems needed to control atmospheric contaminants, b) collect and regenerate condensate water, and c) recycle solid wastes.

    3.) Integrate all of the systems in point 2 with the growth in point 1.

    Here's a link to a page that gives a decent 'least you need to know' overview of the project.

    http://www.permanent.com/s-ce-nas.htm

    Of course, NASA hasn't made it to including humans yet, but since as per /. protocol I haven't RTFA, I don't know if the russians are 'cheating' on all of these mundane details.

  74. In soviet union by benjonson · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Union, Mars comes to you!

    --
    =-+
  75. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by flechette_indigo · · Score: 1

    I think it would be much cheaper to do it like this:

    1) Send a robot to a handy asteroid between here and mars.

    2) Have the robot base-ize the asteroid (via solar-melt-iron-bubble technology) and fil it with air and some easy food-crop (algae?).

    3) THEN send some people to this base to do the final construction. Use it as a starting point for forays to mars and beyond.

    It might be cheaper and safer to do it this way. Faster? Maybe, I haven't done the math. Biggest hurdle I see is getting tons of crap out of our gravity well. Maybe a hurdle we should avoid. There's lots of nice nickel-iron and sunlight out there. Avoiding heavy-lifting unnecessary resources strikes me as key.

  76. finally they are admitting its all fake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when's the US going come clean that the moon landing was faked in a warehouse in Arizona...

  77. Port Linux by Citizen+Gold · · Score: 1

    Port the linux kernel to that PDA from Doom3.

  78. NASA did this a while back.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing a doco about it. I think the ship was called "Capricorn 1"..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  79. Mars Society by Keebler71 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Mars society has conducted similar research during these experiments although the Mars society research focuses less on duration and psycological effects and more on requirements analysis. (i.e. not can we survive, but what will it take to survive and accomplish useful science.

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  80. Gives purpose, maybe pride by ralphcringely · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "living your life is like riding a bicycle. its easier to keep your balance if you're going somewhere". I forget who said that. Voltaire? Erving Goffman? Fritz Perls? Anyway, it's true for countries too. I applaud Senor Putin. Set a goal. Get everyone to push for it.

    Is'nt that what Senor Kennedy did for us with the moon? I mean, why did we go there except to have a goal?

    --
    Tell me again, who knew Mary was a virgin, and how did they know?
  81. Russian Reality TV by siriuskase · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's nice to see the Russians getting into the reality show thing.

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  82. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I join ?!!!?? I'll put off suicide until after the experiment, this is my chance to survive this lingering depression !

  83. Will they name it Capricorn Onesky? by csoto · · Score: 2, Funny

    But be sure to check out Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy site for fact-checks.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:Will they name it Capricorn Onesky? by profzoom · · Score: 1

      Oooh! Will we be treated to another heartfelt performance by O.J. Simpson?

  84. this is somewhat close... by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...to what long duration voyage submariners go through. 500 days is a long time though, I don't think any totally submerged and all sealed up submarine voyage has lasted that long, I think something like 6 weeks is more normal.(could be wrong on that, any knowledgeable folks please correct me) I am sure there are tons of scientific studies already about the physiological and psychological impacts of long term close quarters living, where you can't just "get out" and all your existence is self contained, more or less. The subs though can make their own fresh water and O2, so that makes it easier in many ways. Also no weightlessness to contend with. But....similar.

    Hmm, sorta like jail, too, in a way.

  85. Robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they have their own HAL?

  86. FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by spineboy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    One way to more effieciently store food for the journey is to have fat astronauts. A pound of fat contains about 3500 kcals of energy - roughly a day and a half energy supply for an average weight male. So a 75 pound overweight astronaut would have roughly 120 days of stored, packed on food - or 25% of the trips food requirements (About 2 tons!!!). It is a MUCH, more efficient way to store "food" weight for the journey.

    Yes this does appear to sound quite funny, but I think that this is very doable, without much of a health risk at all to the astronauts.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      is to have fat astronauts.

      Better, really, to have small astronauts. No one more than 4 feet tall. They'll need less food to stay alive, a smaller habitat, and less air to heat.

      Could pick em short + fat, I guess...

    2. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      How are you supposed to get the fat austronauts into space?

    3. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell them there's a new Krispy Kreme opening on Mars.

    4. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by joggle · · Score: 1

      So your suggestion is to put some fat, smelly (sorry, fat does stink in and of itself), hungry astronauts for an extended mission in a very confined space. I wonder how many would return.

    5. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by mrjb · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight. First they'd let the astronauts go on an overcaloric diet so they'd gain weight. Once they're all nice and chubby, BAM! They're off to Mars, and they're not supposed to (a lot) because their fat is supposed to be the main part of their supplies. I guess they'd only be popping vitamins to stay healthy?

      I for one wouldn't want to be an astronaut if I wouldn't be properly fed on my trip- I already get moody if my meal is a few hours late. Of course, to save weight, they *could* bring highly caloric foods (and not just tons of butter). Peanuts would be great- highly caloric and (almost?) no saturated fats. And yummy too :)

      Still, it wouldn't harm for the astronauts to have some body fat for emergency situations. At least it would help them to get back alive, should the food get stolen by aliens.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    6. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      There was a disturbance in the force, like a million /.er voices all cried out in unison: "Yes!"

      --
      -Styopa
    7. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only problem with this plan really, is that fat astronauts would have all sorts of health problems that would prevent them from being able to even set foot in the launching craft. You see, besides the fact that the food is such a small amount of the mass required (water + oxygen are the big ones, and being fat increases your dependency on these), you take say someone who's 75 pounds overweight, right? They launch under what, 5Gs or so? Say they're ideal weight is 150, so they weigh 225. During launch they'll weigh 1125 pounds until they hit orbit, at which time they'll be in free fall.

      Do you know any fat guy whose heart can take that sort of change? Furthermore, do you know of any fat guy who, after going through the training program so that they can take the normal amount of weight during launch, will still be fat?

      Or is this some sort of CowboyNeal joke? You know, send HIM to mars so we don't have to deal with his silly polls anymore?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  87. Re:Americans have already tried something like thi by nytes · · Score: 1

    IIRC:
    According to the doctor that was in B2, the weight loss was expected due to the diets that they were following (calorie restricted) and by and large, the crew was actually happy with the weight loss.

    The reason that they had to open the doors and bring in supplies was that they didn't count on how fast the bugs would take over. The bugs started eating everything they could grow, and also were using up the oxygen.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  88. A lesson in Grammar ... by gradji · · Score: 1

    I read the headline "Russian Mock Mars Mission" and was all ready to fire up a "Red, White and Blue" post!

    How dare the Russians mock U.S. Mars missions!!!

    I must be channelling GW ... I almost started another international incident!

    --

  89. Re:About you sig... by NorthDude · · Score: 1

    By definition : fair = good and unfair = bad, right?

    We could say that fair tend to be good to the infinite and that unfair tends to bad minus infinite, right?

    So if I understand your sig, you say that the trick is to do anything possible so your life tends to be infinitly bad? Wouldn't the trick be to make it more unfair towards other, so to make it fair for you (assuming that there is a finite suply of fairness that is).

    I was just wondering... I was trying to take a break from my calculus homeworks ;)

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  90. Where's the robot? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Seems it would be MUCH harder to create a robot to perform the tasks you suggest, than to use human-power to build it.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Where's the robot? by flechette_indigo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it'd be alot simpler than a lander-rover. No gravity or atmosphere-entry to contend with.

      Here's the scenario. I'm I'm totally ripping off Larry Niven Here.

      Assuming that we can find an asteroid with the desired consistancy and orbit we'd need the following operations to be performed:

      Make big curved mirror: Blow up balloon. Spray foam over it. Puff a little vaporized silver inside it. Cut it in half.

      So you got big big heater/cutters now.

      Drill the asteroid.
      Throw in a chunk of ice (gotten off a neighboring asteroid, sealed within a big prefab exploding can).
      seal the hole.
      Melt the asteroid into a big molten ball
      explode the can.
      Let bubble cool.
      Drill hole.
      Slap in prefab airlock..
      throw in more ice.
      Heat it up to 72 degrees or whatever.
      Electralysize some of the water for atmosphere.
      grind up some of the rock for soil.
      Innoculate the soil...

      ok, maybe it is kind of involved.

      How about just a power station ( temperature-differential generators? ) and a pile of refined minerals. It'd be a nice step. You'd melt the ball (no exploding can)and spin it. When it cools you got refined strata.

      So now the robot's gotta:
      Fling out a sheet of electricity-making fabric/grid/whatever.
      Blow up a balloon, spray foam over it (maybe the balloon could handle this itsellf), squirt the silver.
      Cut it (again, maybe the balloon. Maybe the mirrors could make themselves).
      Spin the asteroid (ion rocket-pack?).
      Aim the mirrors.
      (Could the robot process molten metal into thousands of miles of wires for the generator? Controlled-splash it? Vaporize it and spin it on magnetic fields?)

      Would this power-station / resource-dump be feasable?

  91. OK... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who read this as "Russia mocks mars mission" ? I thought they were making fun of the US again.

    1. Re:OK... by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Yep.. when I first read the headline, I could have sworn it said "Russians Mock Mars Mission".

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
  92. I misread the post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the story of six volunteers, pickled alive inside a capsule and have their livers taped to find out what happens...

  93. Me too. :-) by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 1

    I reread the headline several times trying to figure out why the Russians are mocking us.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  94. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think this has a better chance of success than Biodome because Pauly Shore is so annoying.

  95. not the first time... by hamishmorgan · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember reading about this happening before, around the time that Soviet rule was ending in Russian. They took two volunteers and made them lie in a bed for months, simulating long term space travel. One of them gave up but the other went insane and eventually died of a genetic heart condition exacerbated by not getting any exercise.

  96. Why does this sound like a '60s sitcom? by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Just sit right back
    and you'll hear a tale
    A tale of a faithful trip.
    That started in this frosty port
    Aboard this tiny ship

    The mate was a mighty cosmonaut
    The Skipper brave and sure
    Six volunteers blasted off that day
    For a 500 day tour
    A 500 day tour.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  97. Food and Water by amokk · · Score: 1

    Zdravstvuite Comrade!

    Finally, something worth standing in line for!

    --
    I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
  98. Russians Mock Mars Mission by jafiwam · · Score: 1


    HAH HaH!

    While pointing.

  99. Russia Mocks Mars Mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia: Have at you.
    U.S.: You are indeed brave, sir knight, but the fight is mine.
    Russia: Oh, had enough eh?
    U.S.: Look, you stupid bastard. You've got no arms left.
    Russia: Yes I have.
    U.S.: Look.
    Russia: Just a flesh wound!

  100. Great "Reality show" by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's really just an experiment on how much attention they can get. If enough interest is shown, they'll have quite a few seasons worth of "Reality TV" out of it.

  101. all gay crew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they could sing the "YMCA" song...a lot.

    they could add 500 lbs. of body oil, poppers and ectasy to load and get rid of half the food

    the new spacesuit could be a biker outfit with leather chaps and exposed buttocks, or maybe an indian head dress.

  102. Air, Water, and Food. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Food, other consumables, oxygen, water, yes, these are valid simulations. I'd also like to see what the options are for running a hydroponics lab to oxygenate the air and cleanse sewer waste, though not to eat necessarily since this would involve a fair amount of work.

    I'd thought about the air and water recycling problem when running a different thought experiment (was planning what amounted to a single-person spacecraft with a 1-2 week nominal mission duration capacity).

    It turns out that if you're only going out for a couple of weeks, or if you have a significant mass budget, recycling isn't important at all. The mass of food consumed is surprisingly low, and we have plenty of experience keeping it light and compact (think "MRE"s; the military has a vested interest in food that keeps and is easy to transport). Oxygen consumed will at most be enough to burn that food - the part of that food that's not already oxidized (water-based). Water consumption is relatively low - a couple of litres per day for a comfortable allocation. So you have a few pounds of supplies used per day, and can easily store a year or more's supplies without the supplies outweighing the rest of your expedition's equipment.

    For recycling, air and water are the most important. Water because you go through a significant amount of it, but it's still fairly easy to recycle, and air because you go through a _lot_ of it (2-3 times the dry weight of your food). Both of these turn out to be easy to do if you have _power_. Brute force chemical processes and (for water) techniques like distillation come to the rescue. While 100% recycling of water is hard to do, even 80-90% would have a huge impact on your supply mass, and air recycling is very nearly perfect.

    A biologically based recycler has the advantage of being able to turn solid waste into food, but that's about its only advantage. System efficiency vs. energy in (light) is actually pretty poor, and it takes a lot of space and a lot of mass, even if you use something like algae that's near the bottom of the food chain and has low infrastructure requirements.

    Biological recyclers are useful when you can afford a large facility mass, and when you have a lot of people to feed. These are true on a large space station (think "colony") or planetary base (again think "colony"), but not for most spacecraft.

    Still very interesting to think through the options for.

    1. Re:Air, Water, and Food. by grudy · · Score: 0
      Elements of the experiment have been attempted previously -- Do we remember that mockery of BioSphere 2? (no, not the appauling Paulie Shore movie, "Bio-Dome") This site does a nice job of outlining the requirements of a viable biosphere or otherwise self-contained environment.
      The thing that will prove interesting is whether or not the Russians will employ any of the information they learned from their CELSS experiments in the 60s , improving on the technology and science -- esp since the CNN article makes no suggestion of traditional CELSS techniques.
      One of the things I found most curious about their proposed experiment is the sheer volume of material they intend to "bring along"... If I'm doing my math right (no guarantee there), 12 Tons of payload (assuming the need to protect the raw material and the need to divide the raw material into reasonable payload weight (per Arian 5 current specifications) (not including the habitat and its associated sundries) in current terms equates to, about $300M. That's just launch cost, and says nothing about development, storage, maintenance, docking, or any of those other fun things, bringinng the ticket (less development costs) close to $13B (figure another $30-50B for development costs). The other item of concern is the processing of waste.. If they're BRINGING their food, and not growing it, there's the associated packaging that goes hand-in-hand. Last I checked, that plastic baggie burried in my back yard with my dearly-departed hampster from 3rd grade is still intact.
      I'd also be interested in finding out if they intend to simulate conditions and catastrophes a la MIR in their experiment. Or the effects of that mysterous space fungus , or bombardment by cosmic radiation. The record for space endurance is still held by Cosmonaut Valeriy Polyakov following his 438-day mission aboard MIR -- the long-term effects of cosmic radiation exposure are still unknown, and Russia is renowned for under-reporting ill effects.
      As with many of my generation, the dream of cosmic exploration by the commomn-man is quickly being usurped by the likely reality that perhaps our grandkids or great-grandkids will have that chance. That said, I am hopeful that perhaps this will lead to private venture a la Ansari to egg our governements on to partner with private industry to actually move us beyond our 30-year-old boundaries.

      Ok.. Sorry to do it, BUT... "Well, can you at least make it taste like chicken? Otherwise, I'm gonna shrivel up like a super model"

    2. Re:Air, Water, and Food. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Elements of the experiment have been attempted previously -- Do we remember that mockery of BioSphere 2? (no, not the appauling Paulie Shore movie, "Bio-Dome") This site does a nice job of outlining the requirements of a viable biosphere or otherwise self-contained environment.

      The point is that this _isn't_ a self-sufficient environment, and what I was trying to show in my post was that it doesn't _have_ to be. They're bringing enough supplies to easily last them for the alotted time with no recycling at all. Brute-force recycling using proven technologies can extend that time by a factor of 5 or more (though it's only practical to do so when the mass of your recycler and its power plant are less than the mass of the extra supplies you'd otherwise have to bring).

      So, we don't need the kind of closed-loop biosphere that Biosphere 2 and other experiments have tried to produce, and the Russians aren't testing one (instead, they're testing a disposables/consumables scenario more or less in line with a Mars trip).

      If I'm doing my math right (no guarantee there), 12 Tons of payload (assuming the need to protect the raw material and the need to divide the raw material into reasonable payload weight (per Arian 5 current specifications) (not including the habitat and its associated sundries) in current terms equates to, about $300M. That's just launch cost, and says nothing about development, storage, maintenance, docking, or any of those other fun things, bringinng the ticket (less development costs) close to $13B (figure another $30-50B for development costs). The other item of concern is the processing of waste.. If they're BRINGING their food, and not growing it, there's the associated packaging that goes hand-in-hand. Last I checked, that plastic baggie burried in my back yard with my dearly-departed hampster from 3rd grade is still intact.

      Your own numbers show that the cost of lugging the supplies is a very small part of the mission cost. Designing and building any kind of one-off man-rated spacecraft is horrifically expensive, especially if it's a government job.

      As the cycle isn't closed-loop, reclaiming wastes (like packaging) isn't an issue. Even with the air and water recycling schemes I illustrated, it wouldn't be an issue, because dry waste is still disposable.

      A system that tried to recycle dry waste would either have to do it biologically and use waxed paper or otherwise biodegradable packaging, or else would use a more complicated brute force and ignorance chemical recycler that reduced everything to oxides and hydrides (giving you metal oxides from metals, and water and methane and either elemental nitrogen or ammonia from CHON-type hydrocarbons). These simple chemicals would be further processed into useful forms (methane can be turned into methanol, which can re-enter the food chain and be turned into something edible, for example).

      Both biological and non-biological solid waste recyclers are complicated enough, energy-intensive enough, and heavy enough that I don't think they're worthwhile to put into a spacecraft. You can carry enough extra supplies to last years or decades instead, so they'd only be used for missions that were to _last_ decades without easy resupply windows.

  103. Different kind of stress. by hooqqa · · Score: 0

    I'd hate to be the cosmonaut that ruins everything on day 400. It's not like there are millions of cosmonauts, some of them probably wanted to be in this project but were turned down, etc? It would be even worse if they actually believed they might have a shot at an actual Mars mission in their lifetime.

  104. Big Brother by subzerorz · · Score: 1

    This must be Russua's version of Big Brother.

    --
    Subzerorz
    More Articles
  105. egress (exits) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are going to define a word right after you use it, don't bother using it. If people want to know what the word means, they'll look it up. M

  106. Already done by Mars Society? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Isn't this already being done by the Mars Society's Mars Analog Research Station project? I'm kind of surprised that the Russians don't just collaborate with them.

  107. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by neolegobuck · · Score: 1

    That idea would work better with the moon and not an asteroid. Then moon would be easier then to track an steroid and is closer to earth, making it easier to set up a base.

  108. You wanna find a way to pay for a mars mission? by io333 · · Score: 1

    Make it five hot chicks and one guy. Then charge for the web feed and PayPerView.

  109. Russians Mock Mars Mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title says it all...

  110. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by flechette_indigo · · Score: 1

    I think the asteroids are much resource-richer than the moon. Big chunks of good iron-mixed-with-rocks. Negligible gravity too.

  111. No chicks by Sindri · · Score: 1
    Don't worry guys:
    "Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers."

    You slashdoters can join up without having to worry about feeling awkward the whole time.

  112. last time round... by pvanheus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the CNN article: "Polyakov told Interfax reporters that the 500 Days experiment will not include female volunteers."

    I wonder if this is related to what happened last time they tried something like this. From space.com:

    "Canadian physician, Dr. Judith Lapierre, tells a different tale. She was in the chamber for 110 days. "Somebody pulled me by my arm and tried to kiss me. Of course, we are not talking about [rape], but for me it was a high level of sexual harassment and if women don't stand up, the next thing that happens is usually that. I pushed the guy, but then I was told that in Russia I just should just give him a slap in the face. However, it is not my way of handling such things.""

    If this (sexual harassment problems) is their reasoning behind the decision to exclude women, I think its a pretty poor reason. Why not rather exclude men?

  113. Re:Me too. :-) by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    I reread the headline several times trying to figure out why the Russians are mocking us.

    Yeah, me too. Last I checked, Russia was a powerful industrialized nation that had still failed utterly to develop a sense of humor.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  114. BigBrother mocking the Mars Mission by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Think about it - all these Big Brother shows where they lock up people for a year in a container really do simulate the social and psychological aspects of a mars mission.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  115. Swimming the Bering straits by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1
    Lynne Cox is a good example for standing extreme cold.

    She swam the Bering strait.

    Although she trained a lot in cold water, the article also says she has a natural tendancy to enjoy cold water.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    1. Re:Swimming the Bering straits by metlin · · Score: 1

      Man, she seems simply awesome!

      She swam the Antarctic in 25 minutes? I do not think any amount of preparation can really prepare you for that.

      A lot of it probably has to do with her own body's physiology rather than anything else. Incredible neverthless.

  116. If they allowed American women on this mission... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then food (for fat American women) and alchohol (for spoiled Russian men who will face those ugly broads all the time) reserves should be increased al least 100 times.

  117. Putin don't drink vodka by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He drinks Chateau Petrus and Romanee-Conti every day.

  118. Re:Me too. :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Russia every day someone dies of laughter at general american stupidity.

  119. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by Grab · · Score: 1

    Mineshaft ain't a good solution. One of the things you'll get on Mars and during the trip is light. If you don't need artificial light running your hydroponics, that's a bunch of energy budget saved. Being able to look out of a window will also help stop your subjects going crazy with cabin fever. :-)

    Also, if you're going to spray the walls with concrete and some plastic, I don't see why a normal building isn't an option. It's much, much cheaper to put up a building than to excavate a tunnel.

    Grab.

  120. Re:FAT ASTRONAUTS!! - yes you can! by RazorBlack · · Score: 1

    You don't have to launch 'em fat. You can feed them in a space station, where it's easi(er) to get food to. Then send 'em rolling to Mars!

  121. Re:Methods for doing this; Russia good as any plac by hesiod · · Score: 1

    > 1) Send a robot to a handy asteroid between here and mars.

    1.5) Hope that asteroid matches the orbits of Earth & Mars well enough to make sure that after 3 years it isn't on the opposite side of the sun as the destination.

    I don't know enough about planetary orbits to say if that's a valid concern, but it seems to me that it would be.

  122. Habitat design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tons of food and water, 6 volunteers.... ...just how big is this Russian mayonaise jar anyway?

  123. Space exploration. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

    As with many of my generation, the dream of cosmic exploration by the commomn-man is quickly being usurped by the likely reality that perhaps our grandkids or great-grandkids will have that chance. That said, I am hopeful that perhaps this will lead to private venture a la Ansari to egg our governements on to partner with private industry to actually move us beyond our 30-year-old boundaries.

    The main barrier to the common man exploring space, and even to things like a Moon or Mars mission, is that getting into space is very expensive. This is due to physical laws (delta-v required is much higher than any chemical rocket's exhaust velocity), so it isn't likely to change any time soon.

    Better materials for rockets will drop the costs by a factor of 10 within my lifetime, at minimum. Other technologies like laser launchers or space elevators have the potential to drastically reduce launch costs, but it remains to be seen whether or not they actually _will_.

    If costs drop to the point where lifting a minivan-sized spacecraft to orbit costs no more than a year or three's salary, we'll see the common man in space (and doing with duct tape and baling wire what costs the government billions and industry tens or hundreds of millions, at the cost of much greater risk to the common men doing it).

  124. It's a fake by Jay+L · · Score: 1

    The Russian mock Mars mission is a hoax perpetrated on the public by the Russian government - they really went to Mars! You can tell by the shadows in the photograph.

  125. Health problems by spineboy · · Score: 1

    I'm a surgeon and see plenty of people much heavy than that who can take stressful situations (surgery!) As far as the stress of lift-off it's greatly exagerated. I'm not trying to sell obesity- but astronauts are so vigorously trained, that I bet you can get overweight, cardiovascular in shape people to easily withstand liftoff.

    The amount of weight saved this way is significant, and yes I know the water and O2 are important - but these will be recycled.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  126. Re:Quote by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving."

    Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

  127. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is funny, not a troll.

    The poster is "performing a mock" Mars mission. It's funny, laugh.