Slashdot Mirror


Secure, Portable, Virtual Privacy Machine

solcity writes "Looks like an online privacy company, Metropipe, are planning to release a secure linux virtual privacy machine that runs from a USB stick. The image contains a pre-release of their new 'Metropipe Tunneler' product and also contains Firefox, and Thunderbird with the Enigmail/gpg extension. Looks like the whole thing is based on damnsmalllinux and uses qemu to boot on Windows or Linux without any installation or configuration. Very interesting use of qemu and damnsmalllinux, and all 100% GPL."

168 comments

  1. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  2. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Link to an 82MB zip file! At least I got mine before the wave hit :)

    1. Re:Nice! by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, they've provided a torrent too, which seems quite well seeded for the moment. So, should not be a problem!

  3. How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    64megs? 128? 256? 512? A gig? Memory sticks come in lots of sizes.

    1. Re:How big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The zip is 82MB. Probably want to run this on a 256MB or larger key so you have room to store data as well...

    2. Re:How big? by Dan+Yaeger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dell is offering a 1GB Mini Cruzer for $50.96 after MIR. This should be plenty of storage for your needs. With 1GB at USB 2.0 speeds you can do more than use this as a toy. Link http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.a spx?sku=A0290872&c=us&l=en&cs=19&category_id=2999& page=external

    3. Re:How big? by Charliems · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uncompressed it is 122MB, a 128MB USB FOB would just make it with very little room for additional storage. 256MB would be more than enough.

  4. Correction by jesuscash · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think they mean PGP, not gpg

    1. Re:Correction by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, PGP is a commercial, non-GPL'd product.

      They mean GPG, open source software that works in the same way.

      --
      Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
    2. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, The PGP zone is for loading and unloading of passengers, there is no stopping in the gpg zone.

    3. Re:Correction by jesuscash · · Score: 1

      My mistake, I even use that at home.

    4. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PGP = Pretty Good Parking?

  5. And yet... by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And yet I am tunneling through SOMEONE ELSES proxy (which isn't free) to do my "secure" work.

    I'm sorry but I cannot bring myself to trust my cookies, settings, and information to travel over anyone else's network. It's not safe unless *I* am the one controlling the proxy and the tunnel between the two.

    SSH, Putty (for Windows users), and squid on your own machine is what I use. Yeah, you still can't avoid keyloggers and the like but at least you know that you are controlling what is being logged and where.

    1. Re:And yet... by Orthanc_duo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I read it wrong, but it seemed to me you only needed to use their "annonamous" proxy if you want to. All the rest could be done through a direct connection or any other proxy you wanted.

    2. Re:And yet... by garcia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I haven't yet finished the download so I can't tell. They do seem to promote their anonymous proxy though and that's what worries me.

      That aside...

      Sure, it's nice to have your cookies and whatnot stored on a USB key but that data is still traveling to your USB device via their hardware. It's NOT secure and they shouldn't infer that it is.

    3. Re:And yet... by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From the README.TXT
      +++WARNING+++
      -------------
      This is a technology preview and comes with NO SUPPORT, NO WARRANTY
      and NO GUARANTEE for any purpose.

      Windows Instructions:
      Double click on 'boot-win.bat'

      Linux Instructions:
      run 'boot-linux.bat' from the command line


      Now what I find funny is that boot-win.bat doesn't exist and I believe what they meant was qemu-win.bat.

      I just can't trust my data to a piece of software that claims no responsibility and doesn't even have the correct filename in a 491 byte README.TXT.

      I'll stick w/my current methods TYVM.

    4. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't trust my data to a piece of software that claims no responsibility

      So you'll avoid just about every piece of software written, then?

    5. Re:And yet... by 26199 · · Score: 3, Informative
    6. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because my God, if anyone got a hold of your top secret Star Trek fan fiction before it was ready for release, holy crap, there would be hell to pay!

    7. Re:And yet... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      You laugh but you have no idea how hard it was to
      • integrate the light saber battle between Yoda and Guinan;
      • write the witty exchange between Data, C3PO, and Marvin;
      • explore the deeper relationship between Zaphod and Captain Kirk after their ballroom brawl over this green skin hotty who had recently escaped some Jabba's;
      • and write a steamy love scene between Janeway and Legolas.

        So While I can see how it would be easy to poke fun at a Warp-Time bubble causing the intersection of the Enterprise (in all its incarnations simultaneously), Voyager, a Star Detroyer, and the Heart of Gold to land next Mount Doom; I would assure you that you cannot comprehend just how difficult it is to do without sounding ludicrous. I know because I did it!

        PS, I can't tell you who Luke's real father is, but I can tell you it rhymes with Crestley Wusher;-)

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    8. Re:And yet... by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      that link says nothing about how to avoid key loggers.
      it tells you how to not give away your permanent password while on an insecure machine.
      everything you type during your session can still be key logged.

    9. Re:And yet... by Ifni · · Score: 1

      So? Don't use Metropipe's proxy. It's a fully operational Linux - configure SSH to connect to your preffered proxy server and use that.

      Of course, from there on out it STILL goes over someone else's network (your ISP's network and your destination's ISP's network at a minimum). But bottom line is that their tool simply automagically configures that proxy. If you have the knowledge to configure your own (which it sounds like you are already doing), then do so, and use the tool for its other features (which I've already gone over in another post). Or don't - I just wanted to make sure you weren't passing up a potentially useful tool just because you weren't aware of a way to circumvent a single feature you didn't like.

      --

      Oh, was that my outside voice?

    10. Re:And yet... by Ifni · · Score: 1

      Heh - you aren't a big fan of open source, are you? Poor/inaccurate documentation and a disclaimer of all responsibility abounds, even on some of the most trusted OS security software (SSH/SSL, GPG, etc).

      --

      Oh, was that my outside voice?

    11. Re:And yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA you fuck

    12. Re:And yet... by 26199 · · Score: 1

      Of course. But the most damaging use of key loggers is collecting passwords. I don't particularly care if someone logs me hacking at some code, writing an email, or printing out work in one of my uni's computer labs. But if they get my password they can compromise my machine, and that I do care about.

    13. Re:And yet... by geg81 · · Score: 1

      One-time passwords don't completely protect you from that either, since a compromised machine can intercept and alter what you type. So, among other things, it can install some kind of back door during your session.

    14. Re:And yet... by r2q2 · · Score: 1

      If you are that paranoid just use a software based keypad. Also program it to randomize the key's if you are super paranoid. Make sure to put it in a faraday cage for TEMPEST

      --
      My UID is prime is yours?
    15. Re:And yet... by 26199 · · Score: 1

      True. Does that actually happen? It sounds like it'd be technically a lot harder to do than keylogging... and since few people use one-time passwords, there wouldn't be all that much point.

  6. What algorithm? by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 1

    Is this the Apple Wavelet Encryption technology they debuted back in 1999 with Mac OS 9?

    1. Re:What algorithm? by usfGPM · · Score: 1

      No, it is AES-128.
      Details available at http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/filevault/

    2. Re:What algorithm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. And watch that debutting. That's illegal in 11 states.

  7. miscategorized by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is more of a gadget than a your-rights-online

    1. Re:miscategorized by daxxar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh, you don't find this useful?
      I find any gadget which enables me to boot a decent Linux distro useful ('decent' being relative), if it can increase your privacy it's just an added treat.

      Signed email is pretty handy, and setting up that stuff is a bit tiresome if you have to do it for *each* workstation you come to.

      I'm assuming you can 'preconfigure' it, or atleast that it stores your settings? (in contrast to your average LiveCD)

      --
      Kindest regards, daxxar.
    2. Re:miscategorized by serutan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is a gadget, but one that seems likely to stir up more controversy about online privacy vs. the US government's perceived need to know everything. My first reaction to "Virtual Privacy Machine" was, uh-oh, don't they mean "Virtual Terrorist Machine?" Because that's how the Homeland boyz view privacy of any sort. Americans have privacy only in the sense that the government promises not to do anything improper with its unrestricted access. Will devices and software that hide anything from prying eyes survive much longer?

  8. Re:Who's privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Depending on what else is included in the distro... Yes. But there are already distros that let you do that NOW. There's even Windows live CDs that will let you do it to other windows systems. Google is your friend.

  9. So what's your point? by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The data on the laptop is insecure. Anyone with physical access to a machine can read the unencrypted data on that machine. It has been that way forever. The existance of this product doesn't make it any less secure than it already was.

    However, the person with this USB fob has increased his security. Thus a net gain in securtity. If you want to be secure you need to take care of yourself. Sticking your head in the ground is not a viable security plan.

    1. Re:So what's your point? by mukund · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually you could argue that trusting a method is worse than not trusting it at all. Trusting a unknown key for example, for the sake of security, and sending out private encrypted data protected by it is worse than not trusting the key at all.

      Personally, I think carrying your own laptop around is a far better approach (for what the author is trying to achieve) as you don't have to trust others' computers which may contain software to thwart the security of devices such as this USB key by reading all data off it.

      You could find flaws with what I've said too---good security is not easy.

      --
      Banu
    2. Re:So what's your point? by mbrx · · Score: 1
      Yes,using this method is a *little* bit secure. However, don't be tempted to believe it's secure unless you can guarantee that the computer you are sticking it into (insert joke about safe sex here) is guaranteed "safe".

      Admittedly, since the system runs on a virtual machine loaded from the memory stick it's difficult for a process on the host machine to access it's data but it's not impossible. Unless you can actually boot completly (no windows bootstrapping) from the usb stick and know that there's nothing evil in the bios it's just no saef enough for me. / Mathias

    3. Re:So what's your point? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but there are situations where having such a tool around would be quite handy.

      The problem is that one cannot always carry one's laptop all the time, wherever they are. Often times, you end up needing your laptop at a time and place when you are least prepared for it -- I'm sure those of us here who need to shuttle all over the place to meet clients have encountered this.

      And besides, the laptop is an insecurity in and of itself. Thieves view it as something that can be stolen, and it is a device that can be physically bugged.

      True, you don't necessarily trust a computer off an airport in Paris. However, using that computer with your safe-toolkit is probably a whole lot safer than using your laptop with a bug in it -- hypohetically, ofcourse :-)

      So, I suppose this is a good security tool. Not the solution to all the problems, but a good tool neverthless.

      Or maybe I'm just being too paranoid. And that black helicopter outside my apartment probably belongs to that hot chick across the street. Who knows! ;)

    4. Re:So what's your point? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Can't the person with the laptop just run a keyboard sniffer at the bios level? Why would you trust someone else's hardware to be secure?

    5. Re:So what's your point? by cthrall · · Score: 1

      But...if your end goal is to connect to another computer of yours on the net and you wanted to make sure that connection was encrypted and you weren't going to leave traces on the "temporary host," this seems like a good way to do it.

      For example, if I want to connect to my IMAP server securely without this device, my option is web mail over SSL...even then, who knows what keystroke loggers are running on the public machine I might be using. Plug in this, reboot and unless there's some Van Eck device around, chances are much better I'm going to have a secure transaction.

    6. Re:So what's your point? by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      Not *all* computers. If this ran on a Mac and a user had FileVault Enabled they couldn't read the home directory of that user.

      Of course, that's a Mac, but I'm sure similar utilities exist for Linux or Windows.

      Filevault works by transparently putting your home directory onto an encrypted disk image and mounting it at /Users/username. Files are encrypted/decrypted as they are written to/read from the folder.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    7. Re:So what's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This is exactly why OSX has FileVault. It allows you to encrypt your entire home directory. So when the computer is off your data is safe. I unfortunatly used this with my developer version last summer and it corrupted everything. Luckily the powerbook was brand new and i didn't have anything on it. It should be rock solid now.

    8. Re:So what's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are always hardware key loggers that can capture your keystrokes. When was the last time you checked the keyboard port for one on an untrusted computer?

    9. Re:So what's your point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It boots an emulator to run it's OSes. You still have to trust that there's not a software keylogger, etc. in place in the host OS.

    10. Re:So what's your point? by nolife · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a reason to use SSH with public and private keys? Without a private key locally like on the USB memory stick and matching authorized public key remotely, the typed in passphrase is not immediately useful to someone that captures the keystrokes.
      I am no expert in this area and not claiming to be one, if I have a conceptual error, be gentle.

      For years, I've been using a similar method with fetchmail to get my email via IMAP with SSH preauth from my shell provider through a cron job. Of course for this to be non interactive, I have a blank passphrase but still exponentially better then transmitting a plain text password down the line every five minutes.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  10. Re:Who's privacy? by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Presumably, if they were concerned, they'd have encrypted their files.

  11. OK, let's think this through by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, let's think this through:

    As I read it, this is a Linux session running in a virtual machine under the host operating system - the idea being that any "sensative" data resides in the virtual session, so the host has no visibility to it.

    Except that the host is providing all the screen and keyboard access, so if the host is comprimised and is running VNC the attacker can see where you are going, and what your password is.

    True, *IF* the password is only the SSH keyphrase for a private key that is only accessible to the virtual machine, then *maybe* it does him no good.

    But since the virtual machine needs to access the media through the (comprimised) host OS, the attacker can copy that data as well.

    It sounds to me like this is just giving you a false sense of security.

    1. Re:OK, let's think this through by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      besides than that..

      you can buy dongles that record keypresses(that go into the cable).

      if it's someone elses computer and you're _really_ paranoid.. then just forget about using it.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:OK, let's think this through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't computer security based on the notion that nothing is impossible? Doesn't this make your data just a little bit harder to access? Even fully configured MLS operating sytems have been compromised by those with the know-how. No data is totally secure unless it's never been written down or stored electronically.

    3. Re:OK, let's think this through by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if the host is running Google Desktop Search, you are safe from having your data indexed.

  12. Trust is the Key Word by ifreakshow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basically a USB hard-drive that auto configs ssh and your browser so novice users can access proxyies.
    A very cool idea but only "secure" if you trust the company. They say they don't keep logs, but you never know. Also a yearly fee with a limit on transfer.

  13. Not all GPL... by non-poster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The ./ story, as well as the link (Portable Virtual Privacy Machine), say that it's 100% GPL, but at least the Mozilla parts (Firefox and Thunderbird) are under the Netscape Public License.

    Should I believe anything else these folks say?

    1. Re:Not all GPL... by graveyhead · · Score: 2, Informative
      Mozilla parts (Firefox and Thunderbird) are under the Netscape Public License
      I hate to be pedantic (well, ok no I don't, this is slashdot...) but Mozilla is now released under the MPL, the Mozilla Public License. The NPL is considered a "historic document". Grok.
      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    2. Re:Not all GPL... by juhaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      The ./ story, as well as the link (Portable Virtual Privacy Machine), say that it's 100% GPL, but at least the Mozilla parts (Firefox and Thunderbird) are under the Netscape Public License.

      Huh? NPL is Gone. Dead. Buried. Mozilla has been (mostly, and the exceptions should be BSD etc. GPL-compatible) LGPL/GPL/MPL tri-licensed for quite a while now, the new licensing policy is over three years old.

    3. Re:Not all GPL... by non-poster · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing out the same thing as the previous post.

      Anyway, my point was that the thing claims to have 100% GPL'ed software, but not everything on it is GPL'ed.

    4. Re:Not all GPL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's tri-licenced and one of the licenses is the GPL. Fucking troll.

    5. Re:Not all GPL... by non-poster · · Score: 1

      ... and the other two licenses are not.

      All licenses must be adhered to.

    6. Re:Not all GPL... by lordpixel · · Score: 1

      No, you get to *choose* which one of the three you accept the code under. If they chose the GPL then they're using it under the terms of the GPL.

      If you're just trolling then I guess I'm wasting my time, but it really seems like you don't get it.

      --

      Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
      A little bigger on the inside than out

    7. Re:Not all GPL... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for pointing out the same thing as the previous post.

      The previous post whas not there when I clicked "reply".

      And besides, it was wrong too, since Mozilla is not just MPL, but GPL and LGPL too, whichever fits you.

      Anyway, my point was that the thing claims to have 100% GPL'ed software, but not everything on it is GPL'ed.

      Except that you chose to drive that point with an example that is in fact GPL'd, so shouldn't you find another one before the point will stand?

      Sure, it might, but I for one don't care enough to dl the thing and see what it has eaten.

    8. Re:Not all GPL... by non-poster · · Score: 1

      Except that you chose to drive that point with an example that is in fact GPL'd

      Except that it's not GPL'd.

      And besides, it was wrong too, since Mozilla is not just MPL, but GPL and LGPL too, whichever fits you.

      No, whatever fits an author, not a user. And, I assume that this distributor didn't actually write code for the project, but is just using the project, so they aren't dictating the license to be used.

    9. Re:Not all GPL... by kelnos · · Score: 1

      The MPL, GPL, and LGPL cover distribution rights, and by distributing the code, the this project is indeed accepting the license.

      Mozilla (Firefox, Thunderbird) are indeed GPLed. Period. If any user can take the app, modify it, and release it under the terms of the GPL, then that does indeed count as the app being GPLed. At any rate, from a simple user's perspective (that is, a person that just wants to run the software, not modify and/or distribute it), it's totally irrelevant what the license is, as long as the person they get it from has the right to distribute it.

      Free Software licenses give you the right to distribute the code, whether you modify it or not. It doesn't matter if the distributor wrote any code or not, it's still licensed under the GPL (and in Mozilla's case, under two other licenses, that a potential developer/user/distributor/whatever can use at their option to license a derivative work).

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  14. Re:Who's privacy? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it is using QEMU, then it's just another normal process with the same privileges (or lack thereof) as any other. QEMU's basically a PC emulator, albeit a pretty fast and compatible one.

    There is the risk that processes on the host machine can peer at its memory and fish out the unencrypted data without any way of it knowing - unlikely that someone would develop such a thing, but if you're being paranoid there's always the possibility.

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  15. Something like the stealthsurfer? by LocoMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was reading about something like this on a PC Magazine sometime ago called the stealthsurfer (http://www.stealthsurfer.biz/). I guess it's like this except that this one uses GPL software (stealthsurfer uses a personalized version of netscape 7)

  16. Isn't this an LFC spinoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    DMT, LESE, Orlingrabbe.com, et.al?

    1. Re:Isn't this an LFC spinoff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but since Metropipe took over the Mailvault, is has been in unresponsive and unmaintained - shame, mailvault used to be excellent and I still like their interface (apart from the metropipe logo). DMT is also under a new management since a few days..

    2. Re:Isn't this an LFC spinoff? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Argle Bargle Morble Whoosh?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  17. only limited protection by jeif1k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Such approaches give you only limited protection: if you don't trust the systems you plug into, you may still be subject to key logging, screen recording and other attack.

    1. Re:only limited protection by a24061 · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's a very good point. According to the http://pvpm.metropipe.net/ link, PVPM runs from an OS that could have who knows what installed on it, so this would not protect you from someone like that guy who installed keyloggers in the Kinko's computers.

      This is more secure than nothing (although there is the danger of a false sense of security!) and it would allow you to use portable encryption on machines that belong to people you trust, but that's all.

      It would be much better to boot a secure OS from the key. Something like Tinfoil Hat Linux (following the link is worth it just for the Tux picture), but with more features (Tinfoil runs from a 1.4MB floppy, I think). Tinfoil can play text output as Morse Code through the keyboard LEDs, however, to prevent Tempest attacks.

  18. Nope by RealProgrammer · · Score: 5, Informative

    RTFA: it's run on the qemu emulator. You first boot the host OS, and your qemu session is just a process under that, with no more rights than otherwise.

    If you had a boot CD, now that would a problem. Would I let someone boot my laptop from Knoppix? Not unless I would trust them to sysadmin my laptop :-).

    As the above poster says, security accepted wisdom is that physical control implies vulnerability.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  19. Re:Who's privacy? by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would only work if the person was logged in and had access to the USB ports (which I understand some places are locking down now).

    I don't believe that you can get a program to run at the login splash screen.

    So shame on them for leaving their computer logged in.

  20. Can be subverted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Didn't somebody prove a while back that virtual machines could be subverted by flipping a few bits in memory? As I recall, it was a story on Slashdot a year or more ago. Anybody remember that?

    1. Re:Can be subverted by julesh · · Score: 1

      Err. Yeah. If you start messing around with the hardware, there's not a lot that can't be subverted, to be honest with you.

    2. Re:Can be subverted by pkhuong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, it doesn't apply here. The research was made on the JVM, showing that its security was vulnerable to gamma rays, etc, which isn't a big surprise. I'd expect the same for any other program. However, they also managed to craft their program in such a way to basically escalate the program's (class?) privilege level reliably. QEMU has different goals than JVM's security, and it being vulnerable to mutated data isn't more critical for it than any other program. You might be referring to another study. though; that's all IIRC.

      --
      Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  21. Sweet by ptlis · · Score: 0

    I've already got copies of the windows binarys for portable firefox, portable thunderbird and filezilla on my USB memory stick; this sounds like just the ticket for cross-platform goodness. I'd certainly be willing to paypal the creators of this when a final version is released.

    --
    There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    1. Re:Sweet by metlin · · Score: 1

      I'd certainly be willing to paypal the creators of this when a final version is released.

      Paypal is now a verb, too?

      Their website seems kinda slow now, but they mention somewhere that they do not accept Paypal.

    2. Re:Sweet by ptlis · · Score: 0

      Heh, brain burp, what I meant to say was that i'd be willing to use paypal to make a donation to the people who came up with this, but I think you know that.

      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    3. Re:Sweet by metlin · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm quite well aware of that. I just meant to say that they do not accept any payments through Paypal. Wasn't nitpicking, just offering information.

  22. Oh, man ... by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Secure, Portable, Virtual Privacy Machine


    I'm reading that headline thinking I finally have a cone of silence with tinted windows I can carry around, and it's just same dorky VM. ;-P

    Sheesh. Next you'll tell me I still don't get my flying car and robot sex-slave^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hmaid any time soon.

    =)
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Oh, man ... by Airplane-Flyer · · Score: 1

      I was thinking exactly the same thing, but you beat me too it. I still don't have a shoe phone yet either.

  23. Life span? by Remlik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought USB type keys were limited to 100k writes before failure. How many times or how long can you use this device before wearing out the key?

    --
    Apple free since 1990!
    1. Re:Life span? by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many times or how long can you use this device before wearing out the key?

      Well, if you set up a RAM disk and only store personal settings on the USB key -- then I suspect that it would last for quite some time. If you don't care about saving settings, then you can boot off the key as a read-only media and never write back to it. So I don't think this would be a major concern.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    2. Re:Life span? by Fencepost · · Score: 4, Informative

      The limitation on the number of writes to a particular area of memory has been known since flash memory first started to appear. Most devices or drivers should account for the issue by either rotating writes to avoid overusing one particular region or by remapping failing sections into other areas. Remapping failing areas will cause the available capacity of formatted flash devices to gradually shrink, while rotating writes will attempt to keep any areas from wearing out too fast (making it more likely that multiple areas will start to fail around the same time). Someone who's done more looking into this should be able to give a good idea which technique(s) are most widely used.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    3. Re:Life span? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your description is conceptually good, but let me correct and add to it.

      - The maximum number of writes a particular area of flash can sustain has been increasing as the technology has matured. Better manufacuter are now promising, in writing, endurance in the 100,000's and even 1,000,000's of erase/write cycles.

      - Better manufacturers do both the "rotating," called wear-leveling, and "remapping," called spare sectors management or sparing.

      - Flash memory modules already come with reserved spare sectors that are not included in the capacity usable by the host. In other words, as spares are mapped in to replace failing areas, the usable capacity does not decrease. The amount of spares decreases, obviously. Once the spares are gone and a new one is needed, the write will fail. It will be read-only after that but the capacity will be the same as when it was first used.

    4. Re:Life span? by kelnos · · Score: 1

      Interesting... do most flash drives actually have the capability to "remember" how often a particular area has been written to? Seems to me that it would require a fair amount of storage just to do that. You can't do this at the driver level, since there's no guarantee that the device is going to be used in the same machine all the time (of course, using the device in only one machine kinda defeats its purpose).

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
  24. secret decoder ring by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I'd like to be able to send, along with my "ring", a crypto client to the person I call (or equivalent in email). So our messages can be end-to-end authenticated and encrypted, without relying on any other party or infrastructure. I could use different security protocols and secrets for each message, by sending different clients.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  25. hail open source! hail freedom! by museumpeace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good bye Carnivore?
    James bond wants one of these. The FBI, when they finally figure out what this is, will want it banned. I have dreamed of doing something like this with an applet but this is much slicker and more powerful.
    Next questions, can I tunnel through with VOIP? How "special" does my correspondent/recipient have to be for the trail for eavesdroppers to go cold on both ends of the connection?

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:hail open source! hail freedom! by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No.

      You are still trusting the person at the other end. After all this, if the spooks could install sniffers at the other end, your data is still compromised.

      Why go that far, the spooks need install stuff on just your machine, or use other means.

      Carnivore will never entirely go out of the pictures, it's always a Cat & Mouse game. If this becomes widespread, something else would come up to counter it.

      Besides, all this is good only until QC becomes viable and widespread, and at which point your existing encryption systems become quite moot.

  26. whats the root passwd? by Delta-9 · · Score: 1

    Started messing around and some things require root, so who wants to figure out the passwd for everyone?

    1. Re:whats the root passwd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just boot into single user mode and change the password.
      At the boot prompt, type

      dsl single

      then change the root password. :)

    2. Re:whats the root passwd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the desktop, open up a root shell, and change the password, XShells->Root Access.

  27. The Netherlands and Germany privacy friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A quote from there website:

    "MetroPipe's proxy servers are located in the privacy friendly jurisdictions of The Netherlands and Germany."

    The Netherlands and Germany privacy friendly? Yeah, sure, compared to China maybe.

    The Netherlands is known as the country where the most phone-taps are placed.

    Germany and The Netherlands are preparing Europian legislation to log every email message you send, to log every url you are visiting for at least a year "to fight terror".

    Europe is getting even worse compared to the US; everyone is a suspect from now on.
    Freedom of speech is only guaranteed when you agree with the majority.

    Wake up my friends!

    1. Re:The Netherlands and Germany privacy friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, that last statement applies to Slashdot itself in SPADES!

    2. Re:The Netherlands and Germany privacy friendly? by geg81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Germany and The Netherlands are preparing Europian legislation to log every email message you send, to log every url you are visiting for at least a year "to fight terror".

      Well, as opposed to other nations that are doing that, at least they are passing legislation... :-)

    3. Re:The Netherlands and Germany privacy friendly? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Actually, the dutch government has changed it's mind on that subject and will be voting against that part of legislation.

      I know, because I'm dutch (and have read a lot of articles etc about the demonstrations about this subject)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  28. Waaaaaait. by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, lemme get this straight.

    You take this USB key and plug it into an untrusted machine (since, if you had a trusted machine, you wouldn't have to go through these hoops). It fires up a virtualized PC that runs Linux and lets you get out to the web using an encrypted proxy.

    I fail to see the utility of this. You're running QEMU on the host. If the host is compromised (and it's best to assume that any untrusted host is), it has full access to your keystrokes, I/O, and the entire memory image of your system.

    Good crypto software for Unix makes sure to prevent its sensitive data from going out to swap by negotiating with the virtual memory system. This keeps your passphrases and keys from showing up in a swapfile if the machine is compromised. This type of system has no control over that -- if the host decides to swap the emulator out, foom! your entire system image is now on disk. A disk you don't trust.

    Not to mention that processes on the host could simply read through your memory in real time.

    So, in short, an untrusted computer is still an untrusted computer. While this sounds useful for encrypting one's network connections, it seems like an awfully complex solution to reinvent the concept of a VPN.

    1. Re:Waaaaaait. by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a compromise. It's more difficult to modify the hardware than the software. And the software can easily be compromised without even the owner knowing it by various spyware.

      A computer at an internet cafe is likely to have spyware on it, but it would take more work for them to install a physical keylogger. So if you sit down at one of those, you should at least check it for one of these.

      So this will protect you when you're borrowing a friend's computer or dropping in on a client or customer. Probably. It can't reduce the trust to zero. You can get closer to zero by borrowing an Ethernet cable and using your own laptop, but it would certainly be convenient to have to bring along nothing more than a tiny USB key than having to schlep around your own processor, monitor, and keyboard.

    2. Re:Waaaaaait. by bfields · · Score: 1
      If the host is compromised (and it's best to assume that any untrusted host is), it has full access to your keystrokes, I/O, and the entire memory image of your system.

      Yes, of course. I think they're not very clear about what this meant to protect against. I can think of a set of assumptions under which it could be helpful, though. Assume you trust the host machine not to be compromised (so whoever administers it is not out to get you and, in addition, does timely security updates, keeps people from installing hardware keyloggers, etc.). But assume the host doesn't have any of the privacy-protecting software you normally like to use installed. Then this gives you an easy way to ensure you always have, for example, an ssh client with you.

      How useful that would be in practice, I don't know--I'd think that it'd be difficult to maintain a typical internet-cafe kiosk host that was both sufficiently secure and that would run programs off of USB sticks....

      --Bruce Fields

    3. Re:Waaaaaait. by julesh · · Score: 1

      It's a compromise. It's more difficult to modify the hardware than the software. And the software can easily be compromised without even the owner knowing it by various spyware.

      But... this is still susceptible to software compromises. Keyloggers will still work on it. Memory dumps might be able to get sensitive information out of it. Sensitive information might still be written into the OS's paging file.

      It's nothing like as good as it sounds like it should be.

    4. Re:Waaaaaait. by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      What if the entire flash was encrypted with a small partition on it with a decryption routine that also pointed where to start?

      It'd make it slower (probably a lot slower if you're operating in the USB stick only), but adding an encryption scheme would at least slow down someone that wanted to image your USB stick.

      A keylogger would still get stuff though. Hmm...

    5. Re:Waaaaaait. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I can see the intent of this distro. Web surfing and reading email on Windows leaves many traces on the harddrive, IE and Outlook Expess being the prime examples. This tool prevents you from leaving those traces on the harddrive *except* for (as you point out) when the system memory of the VM gets swapped to disk. It can't stop the host kernel from snooping on the memory of the VM either. The webpage also doesn't talk about disk encryption, so your user data is *probably* sitting unencrypted on the flashdrive. It's an interesting concept, but too many holes at this point in development to entrust it with your privacy.

      If I were building this I'd try something faster like coLinux, but only if there was a way to keep system RAM from being swapped to disk. A virtual machine can always be snooped from the host OS. If I was worried about that, I'd just boot into a livecd distro, but then you'd still have to worry about hardware keyboard loggers.

    6. Re:Waaaaaait. by Ifni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The simple answer as to what utility this has is that it solves a number of issues all at the same time.
      First, all of your settings are immediately available - your bookmarks, your cookies, your saved emails, etc, on any computer anywhere without any complicated configuration.
      Second, it is very portable - much moreso that a laptop. And as they say, you don't have to demonstrate that it isn't a bomb to the airport security guard.
      Thirdly, it leaves no lasting record of your activities on the host machine. Yes, if the machine is compromized with memory scanners and key loggers and remote viewing applications (oh my!), this provides no appreciable increase in security. But if you go to your local library's computer you don't have to remember to clear the browser cache, you don't have to be restricted by their web filter, and you don't have to configure their mail client to check your pop3 account (and remember to have it not delete messages it checks for fear of wanting to keep a message that you have now deleted from the server when you checked your mail account). So, for a computer that you have a reasonable level of assurance that it is not compromized, this provides some nice utility.
      Plus, this gives you a portable version of Linux that you can use even if surrounded by Windows machines, and it fits in your pocket more conveniently than a CD. It provides a significant amount of utility in a small, portable package.
      Is it perfect? No. Is it circumventable? Yes. Should you rely on it explicitly? No. But if you don't know what layered security is, this is STILL a better solution than none at all.
      My question is whether or not the QEMU image is encrypted or not, should I lose my USB key and it end up in the wrong hands.
      If you want a solution that is more resistant to the vagaries of untrusted machines, boot the computer off of your own Knoppix CD, then run this from a terminal window. You have eliminated the possibility of any spyware in the machine compromizing your session, and you still have a nice modifiable virtual playground to keep all of your passwords, cookies, email messages, etc. Just be sure to make sure no one is looking over your shoulder and that there are no hardware keyloggers hooked up to the machine.
      For me, it can provide a convenient way to keep commonly used data available to me whether I am on my work laptop (which I have complete control over) or my home computer (which I also have complete control over). That is why I bought the USB key in the first place - to move data back and forth between these two computers and keep some commonly used software/documents available when working on client computers. This just makes parts of that easier.

      --

      Oh, was that my outside voice?

  29. Re:Who's privacy? by general_re · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Stick one of these into someone else's laptop and don't you circumvent the default OS thereby having full access to their filesystem?

    Go into the BIOS settings, set a boot password, and then disable USB boot devices. No, it's not totally impenetrable, but it's better than nothing - at least your attacker will be forced to haul out a screwdriver. And for laptops, probably a soldering iron too, which sort of obviates a quick hit-and-run attack while you're away from your desk ;)

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  30. Slow as hell by joshv · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just tried this on two reasonably modern machines, and it's slow as hell. Unusably slow. QEMU claims to be a 'FAST!' emulator. It is not.

    Why not use Cygwin instead? Almost all of the apps in this distro has have been ported to cygwin, and I doubt there'd be much trouble porting Firefox if someone got serious about it.

    A cygwin based distro could pack a minimal installation (including X) on a USB keyfob that would provide all of the same functionality, but running the apps as native code, at near native speed (minus the small cygwin/POSIX to win32 api translation penalty).

    Now of course this solution won't work on a Linux machine, but I think it would be rare that you'd encounter a Linux machine that you'd want to run this on. Most likely you'd be at a friend's house, or in a computer lab where everything runs windows.

    1. Re:Slow as hell by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      Were you running it on a USB 2.0 stick or a 1.1 stick?

      Just checking.

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
    2. Re:Slow as hell by joshv · · Score: 1

      I was running it off my hard drive.

    3. Re:Slow as hell by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      dude firefox runs on windows AND linux

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    4. Re:Slow as hell by joshv · · Score: 1

      Not under cygwin.

      What I am talking about is a cygwin installation with a full X server. Many of the apps in the distro mentionned in the write-up have cygwin ports (much easier than a full Windows port). As far as I know no one has yet ported Firefox to cygwin. I imagine you could run the native windows version from your keyfob, but that nixes some of the nice encapsulation cygwin provides.

    5. Re:Slow as hell by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      sorry I should RTFP ;-)

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    6. Re:Slow as hell by kelnos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure what the point would be of running it using cygwin. The idea here is to run the entire "secure environment" inside the virtual machine that qemu provides. As others have noted, there are still some problems with this approach, but if you're going to run it in cygwin, you might as well just run the normal native apps. Then basically you'd just have a thumb drive with some privacy-related apps (such as thunderbird+enigmail) on it, which you can make in your spare time; no need to have this productised.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    7. Re:Slow as hell by bhsx · · Score: 1

      Because cygwin has registry hooks. It's not "mobile" or "portable" enough for a USB stick. Find a link to a mobile cygwin that can run on USB or CDROM and I'm all with you!

      --
      put the what in the where?
    8. Re:Slow as hell by Effugas · · Score: 1

      http://www.doxpara.com/apps/cdcygssh

      (in ie, non sp2)

    9. Re:Slow as hell by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      2.2 ghz machine with 512MB and it is slow here too. pretty much unusable

  31. neat-o, but slow... VMware is speedier... by quinxy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Last week I was thinking about exactly this question. I've been using VMware to do the same sort of thing form my laptop, but it has the disadvantage of being costly, non-portable (no easy or possibly legal installing to usb drives/etc.), and not pre-configured for the purpose of this VPM. But in my experience VMware is quicker, feeling almost like the emulated computer was the host computer.

    At any rate, I installed and ran this VPM software, and it certainly seems to deliver, and has a very nice collection of pre-installed apps. Sadly the performance is about as poor as you might expect (that's running it off a HD, not a USB drive). Every operation takes a while to complete, click on Firefox, and wait 40 seconds for it to ask which profile you want to use (this is after first use). Type in a URL and wait at least 30 seconds for any signs that it's coming up. My laptop is only P4M 1.8Ghz, so no doubt performance would be much better on a more recent machine.

    Still, pretty neat, though not entirely usable for me.

    quincy

    --
    Don't vote for Eugene Papansanovich for Congress!
  32. FYI by broothal · · Score: 1

    A similar product has just released a new version as well. Check out Feather Linux

  33. Re:Somewhat OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should they? The risk of pissing off elections officials, voting equipment manufacturers, and disability rights advocates is really not worth it to throw a bone to the techie crowd. Oh, yeah, and the legitimacy of our democracy--pschaa, like that's a high priority for either of them.

    Unfortunately, both D's and R's (in general) are alarmingly complacent with the current state of electronic voting.

    Really, the best you can hope for is to divide the government (federal AND STATE) between the D's and the R's so that they have to compromise on everything, any nobody can ram through a grossly unfair law that would, say, require audit-free electronic voting in all (coincidentally) Hispanic districts, to improve the odds of the party in power.

    That said, I guess my suggestion would be to vote for Kerry (who is a lying flip-flopping rat bastard). Hold your nose if you have to. That's what I'll do. And remember to try to balance the D's and R's in your state government too.

  34. Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Nothing new, Primedius WebTunnel http://www.primedius.com/ already has a USB version, and you don't need to boot into a new OS. Works with your existing desktop.

    I like Primedius because it's much more powerful than what I hear Metropipe is....let's you use HTTP, SOCKS, NTTP, etc.

    Plus they have some sort of peer network that allows you access to sites that have been blocked/censored. Rumor has it that they have a huge overseas userbase.

    1. Re:Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some more info from their website....

      + No need for administrator or account privileges for installation or use.
      + Installs directly on removable/portable media.
      + Take WebTunnel to office, cafe, airport, any network or use it at home.
      + Stealth launch frees you from downloading and installing limitations or restrictions.
      + Leaves no footprint on your PC.
      + Portable WebTunnel can be used with any portable drive.
      + It is compatible with any USB flash drive, Zip or other removable drive.
      + Works with any Windows OS.

    2. Re:Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've tried anonymizer, metropipe, megaproxy, and primedius, and so far, primedius seems to be the fastest of the lot. a little cheaper than the others as well. oh yeah, and their socks and nttp service rocks!

    3. Re:Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Primedius appears to be headquartered in the US. Wouldn't trust the various three-letter agencies with their new found PATRIOT (ha) act to keep their hands of Primedius' servers (and customer data) if the shit really hit the fan.

      Primedius' application appears to be only stored on a USB, and run on a host machine. This will result in history, cookies, etc. being recorded and placed on the host machine - a fairly serious threat to privacy. The Metro VM thing would keep this information on the USB drive.

      A peer network sounds real interesting - but then you're trusting some random stranger with your privacy. Admittedly, trusting a company is similar, but at least they have an interest in establishing and keeping a reputation for honesty and keeping out of their customer's business.

      MetroPipe appears to support HTTP/S, FTP, and SOCKS v5 (which would include just about every protocol). From their products page:

      "Fully functional HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and SOCKS v5 proxies available for any of your Internet applications that support proxies."

    4. Re:Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they have a 'file-shredder' type of product too, that completely nukes your cache.

      Primedius also supports SOCKS 4 & 5...

    5. Re:Primedius USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Primedius looks OK, but I simply do not trust US-based services nowadays. They may have the best intentions, but when the thugs show up...

  35. Complications- by Commander+Trollco · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Unfortunately, that flash fob is of very limited lifespan.

    The limitation on the number of writes to a particular area of memory has been known since flash memory first started to appear. Most devices or drivers should account for the issue by either rotating writes to avoid overusing one particular region or by remapping failing sections into other areas. Remapping failing areas will cause the available capacity of formatted flash devices to gradually shrink, while rotating writes will attempt to keep any areas from wearing out too fast (making it more likely that multiple areas will start to fail around the same time). Someone who's done more looking into this should be able to give a good idea which technique(s) are most widely used.
    Short lifespan translates into disposability; this creates a security problem: what to do with the old drives?

    --
    http://persianews.on.nimp.org/?u=Tar_Baby
    1. Re:Complications- by homer_ca · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Unfortunately, that flash fob is of very limited lifespan."

      That's not really a problem. Damnsmalllinux is a livecd distro and the concept is similar when you boot off a flashdrive. The boot media is mounted readonly and the OS actually runs in a ramdisk (these days it's called a shared memory filesystem). The only writes would be user data which is very little compared to the OS.

      As far as disposing of a broken flashdrive, I'd say take a hammer to the thing and be sure to smash up the flash chips very well.

    2. Re:Complications- by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      Uhh, moderators -- parent is a troll. An obvious troll at that.

      If you read what he is saying, you'd realize that it does not make any sense whatsoever, and has absolutely no relation to the original poster's response.

      Please mod parent down.

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
    3. Re:Complications- by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      Bah, iPod's don't use flash based hard drives. I'm installing it right now!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  36. Re:Who's privacy? by Pantheraleo2k3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please RTFBlurb. It uses QEMU to run on top of Windows or Linux. Therefore you do not circumvent the default OS.

  37. Dynamic Forwarding by engine+matrix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why do so many people continue to only use Squid/SSH for proxying when it is not required anymore? SSH supports dynamic port forwarding.

    SSH basically includes a builtin socks proxy. Download putty and create a dynamic port on locahost:1080 and say goodbye squid.

    Of course there are still advantages to having a local squid proxy, but in most cases it's not worth the effort anymore.

    1. Re:Dynamic Forwarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSH basically includes a builtin socks proxy. Download putty and create a dynamic port on locahost:1080 and say goodbye squid.

      file and ad blocking.

    2. Re:Dynamic Forwarding by engine+matrix · · Score: 1

      Firefox adblock plugin.

    3. Re:Dynamic Forwarding by NTT · · Score: 1

      Huh. Sounds intriguing. What do you mean "dynamic" port. A HOWTO please... Thanks.

    4. Re:Dynamic Forwarding by engine+matrix · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are using putty simply create a dynamic tunnel on 127.0.0.1:1080 and forward it to your remote ssh server. If you are at work and they block http connects you should have the ssh server running on 443. (another advantage or tunneling over 443 is that people expect to see encrypted traffic, so you'll be flying under the radar)

      Now in Firefox, Thunderbird, Trillian, whatever... tell it to use a socks proxy on 127.0.0.1:1080.

      Before dynamic forwarding you would need to have squid and/or manually forward all of the ports you wanted to connect to.

  38. Re:Who's privacy? Why the term "circumvention"? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    This is from a F/LOSS/Linux user perspective:

    We need to get out of the habit of calling this circumvetion. If we don't then this usage will lend further credence to ms and furter reinforce some badly-written legislation. If Linux is to be used (as it is now and can be in the future), this notion of "hijacking a box" should be described more discretely.

    Putting Linux on a box and being able to "see" the file system is not a guarantee that useful passwords will be found or enable a malicous log in. True, the "rogue" OS (even another windoze USB/stick) can ask for a DHCP address, but the MAC filter list combined with a valid login, and some OS fingerprinting could protect locked-down environments.

    Now, let's take San Jose State and the MLK Library: If I or any student or visitor should use the computer with a Mandrake stick, is that circumvention, so long as it is a publicly-available desktop intended for surfing and printing? Users already are discouraged or prevented from saving personal information to the disk. When they print, it goes to another desktop (a Dell acting as a windoze-based file server, it seems) and they use a mag card and swipe it, then enter a password to retrieve their docs at the print station.

    Whupps.. have a meeting... will continue...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  39. Could pave the way by farlcow · · Score: 1

    Could pave the way for the separation of software and hardware. Imagine if all motherboards were able to boot from USB. They already have USB pens more than capable of holding an OS, all your apps, and your data (except for games I can do everything I need to do with 4gb which is the size of the biggest USB pens). Everyone could carry their favorite OS distro, their settings, and all their data with them.

    It seems silly to still be locking ourselves into a single set of software for a particular set of hardware. I think if this type of system were to catch on it would only increase the use of Open Source. By letting each person choose their own set of OS and apps for every computer they use I think we'd find a wider range of software being used (because people can make choices based on personal preference rather than avilability of software). This would encourage software developers to make their programs be more universally compatible and this seems to go against what many current closed developers practice.

  40. Double sweet by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Sure, he verbed the word. You don't have to grammernazi him over the fact.

    The site is probably slow because it's being slashdotted...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Double sweet by metlin · · Score: 1

      You don't have to grammernazi him over the fact.

      Grammernazi is now a verb, too? :)

      And yes, I'm quite aware that the site is down because it's being Slashdotted.

    2. Re:Double sweet by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

      No it isn't, but it wouldn't be ironic humor if I used a proper verb. Similarly, the word, 'slashdotted' is also an example of a noun that is being turned into a verb for humorous...oh never mind. *sigh*

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  41. Re:Who's privacy? by general_re · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, it's not even a bootable device.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
  42. I must be gettin' old... by kippa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I read...
    Secure, Portable, Virtual Piracy Machine

  43. Article text - http://pvpm.metropipe.net/ by the+JoshMeister · · Score: 1


    Here's the full text of http://pvpm.metropipe.net/ in case of the Slashdot effect (it took me a couple tries to get in):

    ---
    MetroPipe - Portable Virtual Privacy Machine - Technology Preview PR1.0
    Mirror Node: pvpm.metropipe.net
    MetroPipe High Speed Bittorrent Tracker and Dedicated Seed
    pvpm.metropipe.net http://pvpm.metropipe.net/metropipe.net-portable-v irtual-privacy-machine-PR1.0.zip.torrent
    Size: 82M
    HTTP Mirrors
    pvpm.metropipe.net metropipe.net-portable-virtual-privacy-machine-PR1 .0.zip
    Size: 82M

    The Portable Virtual Privacy Machine Home Page
    http://www.metropipe.net/ProductsPVPM.shtml

    ABOUT

    The MetroPipe Portable Virtual Privacy machine contains a complete portable virtual Linux machine with privacy-enabled Open Source Internet applications.

    No installation needed - just plug the drive into any Windows or Linux computer, and click on the Virtual Privacy Machine icon and you're ready to go.

    Carry your Internet applications, email, bookmarks, history, web cookies, download files in your pocket.

    Carry your entire Internet communication system on a tiny USB drive.

    Runs on any rewriteable media (USB drives, Flash Memory cards, Secure Digital devices, iPods, etc.)

    Includes:
    Mozilla Firefox Browser
    Mozilla Thunderbird News/Email Client
    Enigmail GPG (PGP Encrtytion program for Thunderbird)
    Persistent home directory
    Demo MetroPipe Tunneler

    Perfect for travellers - nothing to be scanned, started, poked, or prodded at the airport.

    Get English keyboard support no matter what computer you use.

    The VPM's network connection will auto configure and run seamlessly on any machine with a working internet connection.

    All Internet session data (cookies, history, downloads, etc.) are stored on the VPM, not the host computer.

    This PR1 release runs on Windows and Linux - final release version will also run on OS X.

    Includes Mozilla Firefox browser, Mozilla Thunderbird News/Email client (with Enigmail plugins for PGP email encryption), persistent Home directory, a demo version of the MetroPipe Tunneler.

    Created from 100% Open Source GPL code and binaries.

    INSTRUCTIONS:
    Unzip the file, and read the README

    Runs in full screen mode (press SHIFT-CTRL-F. SHIFT-CTRL captures and releases focus.)

    Core Ingredients:

    Damn Small Linux - Business Card Sized Live Linux based on Knoppix http://www.damnsmalllinux.org

    QEMU - CPU Emulator http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/

    Released by MetroPipe

    MetroPipe Network Services - http://www.metropipe.net/

    MetroPipe Tunneler - Encrypted Anonymous Web Browsing

    The Portable Virtual Privacy Machine Home Page

  44. Will it get me around Websense? by 3nuff · · Score: 1

    The man is keepin' me down...

    --
    "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
    1. Re:Will it get me around Websense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Primedius WebTunnel http://www.primedius.com/

      They have an anti-censorship peer network for getting around such firewalls/filters.

  45. Re:Do anyone use good grammar anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic... I think you meant to say, Does anyone use good grammar anymore?

  46. jepurdee by gosand · · Score: 1
    Alex: People who wear tinfoil hats are concerned with protecting this.

    *bing*

    Alex: AC?

    AC: Who's privacy?

    Alex: Judges? .... Yes, we'll accept that. Technically the correct question would have been "What is privacy?" Select again.

    AC: I'll take "your and you're" for $200 Alex...

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  47. Windows on USB Flashdrive? by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1
    I want a way to launch Windows98se (that has been pared down to a minimal amount required files) on a Linux or Mac OSX machine so that I can run IE and whatnot without having to reboot!

    Anyone make that?

    1. Re:Windows on USB Flashdrive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QEMU? Just install only what you need, then go and delete all the crap (like help files).

  48. handy virtual PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has much less to do with privacy than it does being able to be relocated from cube to cube instantly.

    The virtual PC can be compromised by the host system.

    The virtual PC enables you to go to any Windows box and run your machine instead.

    From a Facilities group standpoint, this is great for certain employees. From a certain employee's standpoint it could be pretty ugly.

  49. might be better built around Colinux by geg81 · · Score: 1

    QEMU is nifty, but it's an emulator and apparently a bit slow. Colinux lets you run a Linux kernel directly under Windows as an application, without the slowdown of an emulator. It even comes with ready-made Fedora and Debian disk images.

  50. Re:Who's privacy? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    (Note: there are 4 parts/acts here, separated by equal signs... I hope you find them interesting...)

    OH, before if forget:

    == Prologue==
    The stick OR bootable CDs are a GREAT way to test laptops at stores. Hell, NOW you can test a laptop for ACPI and other problems. You can TRY before you BUY, as long as a CD/DVD or USB port are installed and working... And, the best part is that as long as it's a demo rig, is not connected to a LAN, and has no wireless to inadvertently sniff the store, then the store REALLy should NOT complain. Hell, if the test satisfies the geek, or knowledgeable shopper, the store will likely seal a sale. (Or, could that be "Tux a deal"?

    == ACT I ==
    OK...

    So, back to my interrupted post...

    The main contention I have with the word "circumvention" is the legal aspect.

    If a person finds the stick to be useful (maybe not today, due to stick or bus speed, then but maybe tomorrow, if there is a bootable, external HDD with it's own power supply... something doable as long as the disk is not damaged, and as long as it is shrouded properly...), and then plugs into, say a machine at Fry's, or a university where there is a contract that says "microsoft lends or donates or "gifts" you these computers with the understanding that all users or shoppers will only SEE or USE ms windows, and that they will not be dual-boot (I bet, however, these ms tricky-dicks haven't yet gotten around to prohibiting boot-stick OS's that are non-windows & non-Mac) capable and if a "foreign"/"excluded" OS is used, its user will be separated from the machine so there is a consistent, harmonious, anti-competitive and non-competing, windows-only 'educational' or sales environment...."

    It is not inconceivable that ms, desperate to contain and asphyxiate the "Linux/Open Source Virus" will do anything--including rewriting donations documents-- to prevent the sight of Linux. Heck, back in mid-2001 I was told by a MicroCenter employee that they or bound by contract with the laptop and desktop manufacturers to NOT install onto the computers' disks ANY OS that did not ship from the factory. Even tho most Linux distros have no such licensing restrictions. He further said they are not even allowed to let the user stick in their ownd disk to test the computer before buying it, NOT EVEN with the DEMO/DISPLAY laptop!

    == ACT II ==

    WHEW!, so...

    I go to the library, and I make SURE my Linux desktops on my laptop are visible to passersby. When people have DHCP problems, I help them log their windoze laptops onto the net, but the price is I give them a minute or two of Linux, and show them my laptop if they are adjacent to me. I so far "verbally infected (ok, informed)" 10 or 15 people about Linux. I do so at Kinko's, too. Even on the VTA (Valley Transit Authority) buses, showing my LNX sticker on the lid, reading my LXF, Linux Magazine, and other Linux books in plain view on the bus, making sure Tux is smiling back at the inquisitive. Not ALL the time, but sometimes.

    At some point, I think, it will be a sad day when microsoft or some dipshit in various government agencies will, in a precipitous and draconian fashion, declare, "booting into/ont or penetration of a computing device not owned by the user, however slight, constitutes circumvention, and is a federal offense punishable by... X months in prison or jail...X months of community service... forfeiture of equipment connected to the circumvented machine and forfeiture of any computing devices or materials carried on person or adjacent to or under control of the circumvention-initiating person who is apprehended and detained...a 5-year banning of use of computers or computing devices, whether or not connecte to the 'Internets' (a jab here...'intranetS'), ..."

    Will it come to that? Will ms effectively "buy the law and rewrite it" just to maintain a goddam, indefensible, artificially-coopted percentage?

    Let us hope not...

    == ACT III (LONGGGGG) ==

    OK, explan

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  51. A PDA with Wifi will work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Computers in internet cafes have keystroke loggers.
    Laptops are heavy and get stolen.
    My Palm Tungsten C stays safe in my pocket and communicates using Wifi. Easy to intercept, but who cares, if it's encrypted?
    Or am I missing something?

  52. notsosmall linux by elhedran · · Score: 1

    I have seen Gnu/Linux put on devices at sub 6MB, 50 MB is not damn small, in fact its obese in some circles (embedded devices).

    Nearly spat out my cofee when I saw that 'damn small' was as big as 50 MB.

    See the familiar distribution. for more.

  53. Re:Who's privacy? by cortana · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then how can it possibly be considered secure? You have no guarantees that what you see isn't being manipulated by the system you are running it from.

    Of course, you shouldn't be using someone else's computer anyway, god knows what kind of keyloggers or whatever it has lurking in it... :)

  54. People! This is NOT 100% GPL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The C library used is LGPL!

  55. strange? by yeffel · · Score: 1

    So I installed and started running this totaly private distro...I tunneled to my ultra secret eu server and filled out an online form...and guess what the form told me that I am already signed up....how did it it know...something stange ...of course i used a different name...so I wonder what happened...

  56. Not secure by photon317 · · Score: 1


    It wouldn't be very hard at all to write a trojan that waits on the host machine and compromises your "Secure" data once the qemu vm boots up.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  57. Sex pervs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is really a bad idea. think of those sex pervs with kiddie porn. think what this product will allow them to do. hide their nasty porn on these small sticks and they can hide them anywhere.
    god, am i seeing a day when these pervs will hire mules to transfer crap across the boarders?

    1. Re:Sex pervs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I agree! we should ban cd-roms and diskettes too, in fact ni'm starting a campaign to get computers banned except to licensed people.

  58. Reply from within this distro by Bruha · · Score: 1

    I downloaded it and got me a USB key (Been meaning to do that for awhile) It boots faster than my Redhat or Linspire partitions though I dont have a USB 2.0 port (This AMD 64 machine is supposed to) either way it runs fine.. has Firefox .93 though instead of the PR but that can be easily fixed and it does not detect my mouse wheel which would also be nice. However it is quite usable and the only thing I'd want extra is a Sun port so I could use it on workstations at work.

  59. good thing it's not slow by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

    first post! w00t!

    --
    I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
  60. Re:Who's privacy? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Heh! Any knoppix distro opens up any M$ box.

  61. doesn't run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    downloaded it. tried it from a usb key.
    the qemu window pops and it just hangs on
    win2k.

    so much for that...

  62. Disconcerting info on Metropipe site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the official Metropipe site:

    Includes:
    Mozilla Firefox Browser
    Mozilla Thunderbird News/Email Client
    Enigmail GPG (PGP Encrtytion program for Thunderbird)
    Persistent home directory
    Demo MetroPipe Tunneler

    Encrtytion?! Encrtytion?!!! They cannot even spell encryption and expect me to trust them to set up an encryption system securely. I don't think so, keep that "product" to yourself Metropipe!