Not to worry. The Harper Government will be harmonizing and modernizing our domestic law to ensure strong economic partnerships with our key allies and provide a strong and vibrant economic landscape.
Re:It was never worth it to begin with
on
Is E85 Dead Now?
·
· Score: 1
Sure, but ethanol will do 16:1 pretty easily. Doing that much compression with an NA engine is kinda annoying. Easier to bolt on a *charger and call it a day, and also allows you to more adjust for varying octane by adjusting the boost rather than having to do fancy variable compression stuff like Saab's SVC or an Atkinson cycle engine.
Re:Ethanol is feasible, just not here...
on
Is E85 Dead Now?
·
· Score: 1
You're also ignoring other changes you had to make in order to get that 155hp. It didn't come from just from your switch to ethanol, there simply isn't that much energy there.
And without the ethanol, those changes are flat impossible. You simply can't run that much boost without the higher octane rating ethanol provides.
And it's possible to do that adjustment automatically. Saab does it with their biopower engines.
Re:It was never worth it to begin with
on
Is E85 Dead Now?
·
· Score: 1
For ethanol to be useful, you NEED forced induction.
It's also possible that a combination of existing drugs will kill it.
That's the current treatment method for extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB). You saturation bomb it continuously with 5 different antibiotics for over 2 years.
Totally drug resistant TB is when that fails to do the job.
I've had chest infections in the past, and the doctor has told me it's viral, and then that he's going to prescribe me some antibiotics. Wait... what? "It won't cure it, but it might help you get over it" or something along those lines was his attitude.
That's prophylactic treatment to prevent opportunistic infections.
Now I am screwed should I ever catch a real disease and need such things, although as I'm a dairy farmer my immune system is pretty good comparably.
Penicillin is hardly the only available antibiotic. It's not even used all that much due to many people being allergic to it and there being more effective antibiotics of that class available.
a. Is not overly effective. It works about 60% of the time at best. b. Only lasts 10-15 years. c. Causes false positives on our best TB screening test.
They didn't fight it in this case because there's no way in hell they'd win. Amazon has several major distribution centers in Indiana, so they have the "physical presence in the state" required by Quill Corp. v. North Dakota.
The clock does not constantly move forward. it gets set backwards occasionally. It was at 11:43 in 1991 when they were feeling real optimistic about the cold war having ended, though it's marched forward fairly steadily since then except for moving back a minute in 2010.
Basically, it's an indicator of whether we (in a global sense) are acting stupidly or not.
Nice example of unrealistic expectations. It can be good, or cheap, or unrationed, but it can't be all three.
Not necessarily cheap in absolute dollars, but certainly cheaper than the current US system. Between medicare, medicaid, and state programs, the US governments already spend as much per capita as any country with universal healthcare. Then you spend as much again in private spending.
There is no way the US couldn't create a universal healthcare system in a financially neutral manner if there wasn't so much ideological opposition to it in the House and Senate.
Section 3 of the DOMA (defining marriage as between a man and a woman) was struck down back in July 2010 in district court in the cases Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services and Gill v. Office of Personnel Management. Appeals on both by the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group are still pending after the DOJ declined to continue defending the law last February.
Section 2 (which allows states to ignore other state's same sex marriages) doesn't seen to have been addressed yet.
Also, if it stands, the ruling in the first case would complicate your suggestion, as it holds that defining marriage is none of the federal government's business under the 10th amendment.
1. You need to think harder. The CBO found in 2004 there were 1,138 instances in federal law where marital status is a factor in determining rights, privileges, or benefits. Joint property, medical decisions, inheritance, and a lot more.
2. Article IV, Section 1 disagrees with your assertion that it isn't a federal issue. States are refusing to recognize legally performed marriages from other states.
2. The cost of lawsuits is twofold and small. Texas has already tried imposing limits on medical lawsuits. The numbers of malpractice suits has fallen through the floor and malpractice insurance rates have also fallen. Actual medical costs have not and continue to grow at well above the national average.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, same benefit, but without the ability to adjust the boost to allow you to run various E* blends as available.
Some of those features are actually useful
Yes, and they're DROPPING those features.
Not to worry. The Harper Government will be harmonizing and modernizing our domestic law to ensure strong economic partnerships with our key allies and provide a strong and vibrant economic landscape.
Sure, but ethanol will do 16:1 pretty easily. Doing that much compression with an NA engine is kinda annoying. Easier to bolt on a *charger and call it a day, and also allows you to more adjust for varying octane by adjusting the boost rather than having to do fancy variable compression stuff like Saab's SVC or an Atkinson cycle engine.
Great for sugar beets though.
You're also ignoring other changes you had to make in order to get that 155hp. It didn't come from just from your switch to ethanol, there simply isn't that much energy there.
And without the ethanol, those changes are flat impossible. You simply can't run that much boost without the higher octane rating ethanol provides.
And it's possible to do that adjustment automatically. Saab does it with their biopower engines.
For ethanol to be useful, you NEED forced induction.
Without forced induction, ethanol is pointless.
It's also possible that a combination of existing drugs will kill it.
That's the current treatment method for extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB). You saturation bomb it continuously with 5 different antibiotics for over 2 years.
Totally drug resistant TB is when that fails to do the job.
I've had chest infections in the past, and the doctor has told me it's viral, and then that he's going to prescribe me some antibiotics. Wait... what? "It won't cure it, but it might help you get over it" or something along those lines was his attitude.
That's prophylactic treatment to prevent opportunistic infections.
Now I am screwed should I ever catch a real disease and need such things, although as I'm a dairy farmer my immune system is pretty good comparably.
Penicillin is hardly the only available antibiotic. It's not even used all that much due to many people being allergic to it and there being more effective antibiotics of that class available.
Problem is, the vaccine;
a. Is not overly effective. It works about 60% of the time at best.
b. Only lasts 10-15 years.
c. Causes false positives on our best TB screening test.
Please go get selected against.
I think you mean "at will" states, where you can be fired for any non-illegal reason or no reason at all.
"right to work" is a different sucking thing regarding union-only employment.
So they deserve bonuses and promotions?
Record companies aren't artists, so they're not subject to that exemption anyway.
I think you need to double-check your TD1 forms. Your withholding numbers do not add up.
They didn't fight it in this case because there's no way in hell they'd win. Amazon has several major distribution centers in Indiana, so they have the "physical presence in the state" required by Quill Corp. v. North Dakota.
The clock does not constantly move forward. it gets set backwards occasionally. It was at 11:43 in 1991 when they were feeling real optimistic about the cold war having ended, though it's marched forward fairly steadily since then except for moving back a minute in 2010.
Basically, it's an indicator of whether we (in a global sense) are acting stupidly or not.
I often wonder where people who deny pollution is having any effect on the earth think they are going to live if they are wrong.
They won't. By the time the effects show up in force, they'll be dead and buried from some other cause.
Nice example of unrealistic expectations. It can be good, or cheap, or unrationed, but it can't be all three.
Not necessarily cheap in absolute dollars, but certainly cheaper than the current US system. Between medicare, medicaid, and state programs, the US governments already spend as much per capita as any country with universal healthcare. Then you spend as much again in private spending.
There is no way the US couldn't create a universal healthcare system in a financially neutral manner if there wasn't so much ideological opposition to it in the House and Senate.
For a definition of "well" that does not include tools or complex societies.
Because there's this thing between your mouth and your intestines called your stomach filled with bacteria-destroying hydrochloric acid.
Section 3 of the DOMA (defining marriage as between a man and a woman) was struck down back in July 2010 in district court in the cases Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services and Gill v. Office of Personnel Management. Appeals on both by the House Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group are still pending after the DOJ declined to continue defending the law last February.
Section 2 (which allows states to ignore other state's same sex marriages) doesn't seen to have been addressed yet.
Also, if it stands, the ruling in the first case would complicate your suggestion, as it holds that defining marriage is none of the federal government's business under the 10th amendment.
1. You need to think harder. The CBO found in 2004 there were 1,138 instances in federal law where marital status is a factor in determining rights, privileges, or benefits. Joint property, medical decisions, inheritance, and a lot more.
2. Article IV, Section 1 disagrees with your assertion that it isn't a federal issue. States are refusing to recognize legally performed marriages from other states.
2. The cost of lawsuits is twofold and small. Texas has already tried imposing limits on medical lawsuits. The numbers of malpractice suits has fallen through the floor and malpractice insurance rates have also fallen. Actual medical costs have not and continue to grow at well above the national average.
As opposed to an applied mathematician.