Their stated "theory" that it was the Russians that stole Podesta's emails fails the belly-laugh test.
So yeah, they're lying. And it's one of the most cynical political things I've seen in a long long time. It's based on an assumption that people, especially voters, are stupid. And Trump is doing the same thing - his entire campaign is based on the same assumption - all you have to do is listen to him speak.
Two sides of the same coin.
I don't want to vote for either of them. A dead Richard Milhous Nixon is looking quite attractive in comparison.
To date, the Clinton campaign has not once attacked the veracity of the emails.
Not. Even. Once.
They have bobbed, weaved, prevaricated, projected, and otherwise produced non-sequitur "answers" to the questions about the content. But not once have they said "well, that one there, that's false, we never said that." Instead we get tall tales of Russians hacking the DNC -with no evidence - just the Clinton campaign's say-so.
All attacks are upon the messenger(s) and not the facts. And it's amazing how these emails match up with reality.
That tells me a lot. It tells me that the emails are real, and that once Hillary assumes office, the heat is not going to be off. [grumpy cat]Good[/grumpy cat].
I'm quite left of center and the hate for Hillary among my group is probably as bad as the Trump fan hate for Hillary, and people have been complaining about posts disappearing.
Editing content makes you responsible for the content itself, as you are exerting control over it.
I believe practices like this are ridiculously dumb.
Especially since I consider "hate speech" a great idiot filter. It allows me to keep my friends list trimmed. Just like a Confederate flag is, or Trump signs in the yard. But that's my own choosing. I don't want Facebook choosing for me.
Yeah, I know, if it's free you are the product. The problem is that the telnet chat that everyone used has been abandoned (even though it's still up after all these years).
>Windows may suck, but they own the hardware driver market,
Linux supports more hardware than Windows supports at one time. Linux even supports that pre-XP scanner that you had to throw out because Microsoft changed the driver model and the manufacturer said "well, the customers will just have to buy new ones."
>driver installation on linux vs windows
It's laughably easier on Linux. Indeed, there aren't these "driver disks" or ridiculously large "driver packs" with bloatware, Flash, Adobe Reader, and Ask toolbars and other totally unrelated junk.
>no games
Funny, Steam has plenty of games.
>but my (obscure game)
Ah, the last refuge of the Windows shill - windows is a game launcher.
>wider universe of valuable things
I find that the software available from the repos is surprisingly good/and/ is not laden with "appeal to the lowest denominator" graphics nonsense (virus scanners on Windows with animations to demonstrate to the user that it's "doing something" as a particularly egregious example). This nonsense is rife throughout the "windows universe of valuable things."
Every argument against them is an ad-hominem attack against Assange and the Russians. Not against the content, mind you,/only/ against Assange and the Russians. And the spin in the press (NYT) against the emails is that they have recipes for "creamy risotto" in them - minimizing the content of everything else.
Every article, every statement attacking Assange is a mere smoke bomb to obscure the actual content of the emails, which have stunning correlation to reality.
That's why I trust the emails. I don't have to trust Assange or anyone with all this bullshit being flung by TPTB and their lackeys in the NYT.
I am a lifelong Democrat. No longer. Not after this election season. And no "BUT TRUMP" is going to get me to pull the lever for Hills. The "I'm sick and tired of the status quo" straw that broke the camel's back is now we are directly attacking Yemen at the Saudis' behest.
This AG needs to be smacked with a civil rights violation charge and lawsuit.
They first charged Amy Goodman with criminal trespass. The AG had to drop the charge, because it was laughably bogus, as I will demonstrate below.
This is how dumb this AG is:
1. The Native Americans wanted her there. 2. It's their land. 3. JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EASEMENT DOESN'T MEAN YOU OWN THE FUCKING LAND. If you want to own the land under a pipeline, fucking/buy it/ instead of going the cheap route and getting easements.
Ergo, there was no fucking trespass, let alone/criminal/ trespass.
There are no charges for assault with a deadly weapon against the "security" idiots for using/dogs/ against the protesters.
This AG doesn't even fucking understand simple trespass. Where did he get his law degree? From a Cracker Jack box?
And now he "doesn't consider her a journalist" because he doesn't like her attitude. THAT DOES NOT NULLIFY AMY GOODMAN'S FUCKING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, YOU IDIOT.
Amy Goodman got $100k out of the last time her civil rights were violated. She should go after the AG/personally/.
A sufficiently agile drone can do high-G maneuvers that can kill a pilot. Indeed, special care is taken with the flight envelope that a pilot doesn't red-or-black out. There are limits to humans that machinery can surpass and with autonomous drones actually/happening/ now, the days of the human pilot are numbered. I expect this to happen in the near future if it's not already in the skunk-works.
>Drone-f35 synergy
Can be done with AWACS and ELINT equipped aircraft. A C-130 can carry a lot more ELINT equipment than any f35 can. This is especially true since the F35 is supposed to be an over-the-horizon capable weapons system - the pilot never actually sees the target with is own eyes and is far enough to ignore most threats anyway.
And ELINT is better when you have a high-loiter-time aircraft, which is/not/ the F35.
The space station and manned programs are a drop in the bucket when it comes to the military-industrial-complex budget.
Solve problems here on Earth? A *single* Zumwalt class destroyer costs 4 billion dollars.
We could be building our own infrastructure instead of blowing up other countries infrastructure. Instead of Lockheed building more F35s, which will be obsoleted by drones in 10 years, they could be building comms infrastructure, smart roads, and other actually useful things.
But no, we have to build more things that go zoom zoom boom boom because blowin' shit up is sexier. We/don't/ need stealth planes. We/don't/ need to spend so much more money on "modern" buggy armament. There are good reasons why the Russians still tool around in their Tupolev TU-95s bombing ISIS and we in our B52s. Because they are just fine in the conventional wars we get involved in. There aren't any nation-states out there that have anything even approaching the 60 year old technology these planes represent.
Not even China.
And a war with Russia is laughable. Only the lunatics of the PNAC/FPI and the assholes lining up behind Hillary think that a new cold war between the US and Russia and/or China is in the works. Mostly because they're the ones that intend to create one.
If we only stop propping up the awful Saudis and the likes of them, we could be paying attention to our own problems right here.
The hilarious thing is that there is probably more money to be had by companies like Raytheon and Lockheed in building infrastructure instead of building weapons systems, because there is that much more work to do.
Complaining that the space program costs too much when you look at the other stuff is like complaining about some single mom getting food stamps while Goldman Sachs gets handed a trillion dollars to bail them out.
Thursday US officials familiar with the investigation told CNN there was "mounting evidence" that Russia was supplying leaked emails to WikiLeaks, and last week in a conference call organized by the Clinton campaign, former Acting CIA Director Mike Morrell said it was "absolutely clear... WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2 are working with the Russians on this."
WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE?
There is none. This doesn't even pass the belly-laugh test. How do the Russians benefit from any of this? They don't - either way they get some asshole on our side to deal with, and Hillary is more predictable.
Here's the thing:
1. Bernie fans claimed that the Primaries were fixed.
2. Emails from Wikileaks show that there was actual bias (understatement) from the DNC for Hillary.
3. Trump says the primaries were fixed. (like, whatever man, but bear with me for a minute)
4. We saw things like Brooklyn, where over 125K voters were scrubbed from the rolls indiscriminately.
5. The fucking FEDS now claim that the Russians fucked with our elections.
What is the primary common thread through all of this?
That/someone/ - IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO DID IT - fucked over the American People in the Primaries. A vote count is a data set. Once a data set is corrupted, you can't trust it. Ever.
Everyone is pointing out that the Primaries were fucked with. The results are invalid. Q.E.D. Motherfucker.
This wasn't an election. This was a clusterfuck with malice aforethought.
And now, in order to divert attention away from the above, we have NBC News *parroting* propaganda fed to them about a CLANDESTINE TOP SECRET HUSH HUSH CYBER WAR AGAINST THE RUSSKIES!#$!#$#@!!
Since when do we announce clandestine operations on the fucking teevee?
This is intellectually insulting.
Fuck it. I'm "throwing away" my vote for Jill Stein. If my vote isn't going to count anyway, I'm going to put it somewhere else other than supporting "more of the same" bullshit.
Are we to raise an entire generation to think that shooting (imaginary) people until blood splatters the virtual screen is just peachy keen, but those photos of our trip to the nude beach are just oh so terrible?
I suggest you study your own question a bit more and I'm sure you'll come up with your own answer about the utility and value of violence (for the people who are part of the club ("it's a big club and you ain't in it" -- Carlin)) as opposed to the value of art, mementos, and porn (I suggest that porn itself is an art form).
- NSFW means "not sure for what?" What if you work at a pr0n shop??
This is one of the better functions of Youtube. Learning a chord progression by repeatedly playing a CD or looping part of a music file isn't as easy as actually/watching/ it.
Some artists deliberately put videos out there for people to learn to play, like Dr. John.
Another value of Youtube, musically, is that there is a ton of historically significant music on it. Betty Boop cartoons with Cab Calloway music, anybody?
Verizon and the rest assume that nobody needs that much data because the phone companies make you pay out the ass for any kind of reasonable mobile data. So I never use it unless in an emergency or trying to get a bus schedule (trackthet.com works quite well) in Boston. I'm halfway into my data plan and I've used 249MB for the month. I'll use WiFi or go without.
It doesn't matter what service - vzn, t-mobile, sprint, whatever. I'll only use their mobile data under duress.
Just because we know where he is doesn't mean he's not disappeared. When you are put into solitary confinement with no contact with the outside world with no day-night cycle (they keep the lights on all the time) you have been thrown in a hole to be forgotten about.
BTW, long term solitary confinement is torture. Not all torture is physical.
And no, he's not in "protective custody" to prevent other inmates harming him. You can request and get out of protective custody (which is a form of solitary confinement) and people often do to take their chances in general population because pc is so awful.
>Snowden can't be pardoned because he hasn't been convicted.
You don't need to be convicted to get a pardon. Ford pardoned Nixon before any conviction happened. Your argument is invalid.
>The US doesn't want Assange evidenced by the fact that Greenwald is free
Greenwald is an old-school journalist and thus protected in the court of public opinion as well as by precedent. Assange isn't. Assange has been bad-mouthed enough that the general public doesn't give a shit about him and probably thinks he "deserves whatever happens to him." Going after Greenwald is a non-starter. Going after Assange will get someone promoted.
>Contrary to popular belief the US Foreign Intelligence services are not required to work within the Constitution or Bill of Rights
US foreign intelligence isn't supposed to spy on US citizens. That's a violation of my rights as a citizen. Fuck you for defending this.
Back when Ellsberg released the Pentagon Papers, there was an actual chance at fairness if you went to court, which is why Ellsberg is not in jail for the rest of his life.
Today? The possibility that anyone would get a fair shake in a courtroom is laughable.
Assange would do well to stay where he is, even if it feels confining. Because he would be disappeared like Chelsea They would bury him so deep in the system that death would be preferable.
Slashdot Mirror
Their stated "theory" that it was the Russians that stole Podesta's emails fails the belly-laugh test.
So yeah, they're lying. And it's one of the most cynical political things I've seen in a long long time. It's based on an assumption that people, especially voters, are stupid. And Trump is doing the same thing - his entire campaign is based on the same assumption - all you have to do is listen to him speak.
Two sides of the same coin.
I don't want to vote for either of them. A dead Richard Milhous Nixon is looking quite attractive in comparison.
--
BMO
To date, the Clinton campaign has not once attacked the veracity of the emails.
Not. Even. Once.
They have bobbed, weaved, prevaricated, projected, and otherwise produced non-sequitur "answers" to the questions about the content. But not once have they said "well, that one there, that's false, we never said that." Instead we get tall tales of Russians hacking the DNC -with no evidence - just the Clinton campaign's say-so.
All attacks are upon the messenger(s) and not the facts. And it's amazing how these emails match up with reality.
That tells me a lot. It tells me that the emails are real, and that once Hillary assumes office, the heat is not going to be off. [grumpy cat]Good[/grumpy cat].
Karma is a bitch.
--
BMO
I'm quite left of center and the hate for Hillary among my group is probably as bad as the Trump fan hate for Hillary, and people have been complaining about posts disappearing.
Editing content makes you responsible for the content itself, as you are exerting control over it.
I believe practices like this are ridiculously dumb.
Especially since I consider "hate speech" a great idiot filter. It allows me to keep my friends list trimmed. Just like a Confederate flag is, or Trump signs in the yard. But that's my own choosing. I don't want Facebook choosing for me.
Yeah, I know, if it's free you are the product. The problem is that the telnet chat that everyone used has been abandoned (even though it's still up after all these years).
--
BMO
Burma Shave.
--
BMO
Yeah, since the command line interpreter on Windows was so unimportant that Microsoft wrote a completely new one (PowerShell).
>get rid of Terminal
Get rid of yourself.
--
BMO
>Windows may suck, but they own the hardware driver market,
Linux supports more hardware than Windows supports at one time. Linux even supports that pre-XP scanner that you had to throw out because Microsoft changed the driver model and the manufacturer said "well, the customers will just have to buy new ones."
>driver installation on linux vs windows
It's laughably easier on Linux. Indeed, there aren't these "driver disks" or ridiculously large "driver packs" with bloatware, Flash, Adobe Reader, and Ask toolbars and other totally unrelated junk.
>no games
Funny, Steam has plenty of games.
>but my (obscure game)
Ah, the last refuge of the Windows shill - windows is a game launcher.
>wider universe of valuable things
I find that the software available from the repos is surprisingly good /and/ is not laden with "appeal to the lowest denominator" graphics nonsense (virus scanners on Windows with animations to demonstrate to the user that it's "doing something" as a particularly egregious example). This nonsense is rife throughout the "windows universe of valuable things."
>daily use tasks Linux is better
Indeed. And less common tasks too.
--
BMO
This is why I trust the content of the emails:
Every argument against them is an ad-hominem attack against Assange and the Russians. Not against the content, mind you, /only/ against Assange and the Russians. And the spin in the press (NYT) against the emails is that they have recipes for "creamy risotto" in them - minimizing the content of everything else.
Every article, every statement attacking Assange is a mere smoke bomb to obscure the actual content of the emails, which have stunning correlation to reality.
That's why I trust the emails. I don't have to trust Assange or anyone with all this bullshit being flung by TPTB and their lackeys in the NYT.
I am a lifelong Democrat. No longer. Not after this election season. And no "BUT TRUMP" is going to get me to pull the lever for Hills. The "I'm sick and tired of the status quo" straw that broke the camel's back is now we are directly attacking Yemen at the Saudis' behest.
Fuck 'em.
Yes. I mad.
--
BMO
This AG needs to be smacked with a civil rights violation charge and lawsuit.
They first charged Amy Goodman with criminal trespass. The AG had to drop the charge, because it was laughably bogus, as I will demonstrate below.
This is how dumb this AG is:
1. The Native Americans wanted her there. /buy it/ instead of going the cheap route and getting easements.
2. It's their land.
3. JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EASEMENT DOESN'T MEAN YOU OWN THE FUCKING LAND. If you want to own the land under a pipeline, fucking
Ergo, there was no fucking trespass, let alone /criminal/ trespass.
There are no charges for assault with a deadly weapon against the "security" idiots for using /dogs/ against the protesters.
This AG doesn't even fucking understand simple trespass. Where did he get his law degree? From a Cracker Jack box?
And now he "doesn't consider her a journalist" because he doesn't like her attitude. THAT DOES NOT NULLIFY AMY GOODMAN'S FUCKING FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, YOU IDIOT.
Amy Goodman got $100k out of the last time her civil rights were violated. She should go after the AG /personally/.
--
BMO
A sufficiently agile drone can do high-G maneuvers that can kill a pilot. Indeed, special care is taken with the flight envelope that a pilot doesn't red-or-black out. There are limits to humans that machinery can surpass and with autonomous drones actually /happening/ now, the days of the human pilot are numbered. I expect this to happen in the near future if it's not already in the skunk-works.
>Drone-f35 synergy
Can be done with AWACS and ELINT equipped aircraft. A C-130 can carry a lot more ELINT equipment than any f35 can. This is especially true since the F35 is supposed to be an over-the-horizon capable weapons system - the pilot never actually sees the target with is own eyes and is far enough to ignore most threats anyway.
And ELINT is better when you have a high-loiter-time aircraft, which is /not/ the F35.
--
BMO
The space station and manned programs are a drop in the bucket when it comes to the military-industrial-complex budget.
Solve problems here on Earth? A *single* Zumwalt class destroyer costs 4 billion dollars.
We could be building our own infrastructure instead of blowing up other countries infrastructure. Instead of Lockheed building more F35s, which will be obsoleted by drones in 10 years, they could be building comms infrastructure, smart roads, and other actually useful things.
But no, we have to build more things that go zoom zoom boom boom because blowin' shit up is sexier. We /don't/ need stealth planes. We /don't/ need to spend so much more money on "modern" buggy armament. There are good reasons why the Russians still tool around in their Tupolev TU-95s bombing ISIS and we in our B52s. Because they are just fine in the conventional wars we get involved in. There aren't any nation-states out there that have anything even approaching the 60 year old technology these planes represent.
Not even China.
And a war with Russia is laughable. Only the lunatics of the PNAC/FPI and the assholes lining up behind Hillary think that a new cold war between the US and Russia and/or China is in the works. Mostly because they're the ones that intend to create one.
If we only stop propping up the awful Saudis and the likes of them, we could be paying attention to our own problems right here.
The hilarious thing is that there is probably more money to be had by companies like Raytheon and Lockheed in building infrastructure instead of building weapons systems, because there is that much more work to do.
Complaining that the space program costs too much when you look at the other stuff is like complaining about some single mom getting food stamps while Goldman Sachs gets handed a trillion dollars to bail them out.
--
BMO
Thursday US officials familiar with the investigation told CNN there was "mounting evidence" that Russia was supplying leaked emails to WikiLeaks, and last week in a conference call organized by the Clinton campaign, former Acting CIA Director Mike Morrell said it was "absolutely clear... WikiLeaks and Guccifer 2 are working with the Russians on this."
WHAT FUCKING EVIDENCE?
There is none. This doesn't even pass the belly-laugh test. How do the Russians benefit from any of this? They don't - either way they get some asshole on our side to deal with, and Hillary is more predictable.
Here's the thing:
1. Bernie fans claimed that the Primaries were fixed.
2. Emails from Wikileaks show that there was actual bias (understatement) from the DNC for Hillary.
3. Trump says the primaries were fixed. (like, whatever man, but bear with me for a minute)
4. We saw things like Brooklyn, where over 125K voters were scrubbed from the rolls indiscriminately.
5. The fucking FEDS now claim that the Russians fucked with our elections.
What is the primary common thread through all of this?
That /someone/ - IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO DID IT - fucked over the American People in the Primaries. A vote count is a data set. Once a data set is corrupted, you can't trust it. Ever.
Everyone is pointing out that the Primaries were fucked with. The results are invalid. Q.E.D. Motherfucker.
This wasn't an election. This was a clusterfuck with malice aforethought.
And now, in order to divert attention away from the above, we have NBC News *parroting* propaganda fed to them about a CLANDESTINE TOP SECRET HUSH HUSH CYBER WAR AGAINST THE RUSSKIES!#$!#$#@!!
Since when do we announce clandestine operations on the fucking teevee?
This is intellectually insulting.
Fuck it. I'm "throwing away" my vote for Jill Stein. If my vote isn't going to count anyway, I'm going to put it somewhere else other than supporting "more of the same" bullshit.
--
BMO
My wife used to work for hospice.
When she says "transitioned" she means "died."
Which is what Yahoo's going to do, shortly.
--
BMO
/ b/ and /pol/ are containment boards. Moot tried getting rid of /pol/ and the results were less than optimal. You don't want them to go away.
--
BMO
>line eater food
There are extensions that do threading and all sorts of stuff. For chrome and Firefox.
>Usenet
>Threaded
Only if you turn it on in your newsreader.
--
BMO
Notch now looking into buying 4chan Anonymous 10/03/16(Mon)19:51:42 No.56909338â->>56909384 >>56909411 >>56909683 >>56909721 >>56910005 >>56910058 >>56910195 >>56910297 >>56910483 >>56910593 >>56910655 >>56910945 /b/ got quads, summoning Notch to look into buying 4chan.
A lucky anon on
"Assuming it's not too expensive, and assuming I don't have to do any actual work myself, I'm in."
Who here would work for notch maintaining the 4chan codebase ?
Anonymous 10/03/16(Mon)19:56:06 No.56909384â- .jar
>>56909338 (OP)
>entire website will be Java based
>everything inside one
--
BMO
wors't -case scenario
What kind of scenario would this be, exactly?
Sausages?
--
BMO
Are we to raise an entire generation to think that shooting (imaginary) people until blood splatters the virtual screen is just peachy keen, but those photos of our trip to the nude beach are just oh so terrible?
I suggest you study your own question a bit more and I'm sure you'll come up with your own answer about the utility and value of violence (for the people who are part of the club ("it's a big club and you ain't in it" -- Carlin)) as opposed to the value of art, mementos, and porn (I suggest that porn itself is an art form).
- NSFW means "not sure for what?" What if you work at a pr0n shop??
Indeed.
--
BMO
Take your alt-right political trolling and shove it up your ass.
Goddamn, the alt-right is fucking stupid.
Yes, that's ad-hominem. It's also not ad-hominem to call out dumbasses such as yourself bent on bringing /pol/ to Slashdot.
Fuck you.
--
BMO -- Who has karma to fucking burn. Eat a bag of dicks.
>learn a song from Youtube
This is one of the better functions of Youtube. Learning a chord progression by repeatedly playing a CD or looping part of a music file isn't as easy as actually /watching/ it.
Some artists deliberately put videos out there for people to learn to play, like Dr. John.
Another value of Youtube, musically, is that there is a ton of historically significant music on it. Betty Boop cartoons with Cab Calloway music, anybody?
--
BMO
The Clinton campaign /is/ criticizing Trump on the racism thing.
There are a few problems with that:
1. The people who are voting for him don't care. "He's racist? Yes? And? I'm racist too. Why *wouldn't* I want to vote for him?"
2. People with memories longer than a gnat's remember the whole "superpredators" bullshit. Calling Trump a racist is a bit kettle/pot.
3. The Clintons haven't been exactly minority friendly except when it's politically expedient. LGBTQI rights? Only in the past few years.
"You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding" TMBG "Your Racist Friend"
The only one really qualified to call out Trump on racism and "othering" was given the finger by the DNC.
Trump is a bigot. He wears it on his sleeve. Hillary's bigotry is more covert. Hillary is only marginally better, and that's not saying much.
--
BMO
Verizon and the rest assume that nobody needs that much data because the phone companies make you pay out the ass for any kind of reasonable mobile data. So I never use it unless in an emergency or trying to get a bus schedule (trackthet.com works quite well) in Boston. I'm halfway into my data plan and I've used 249MB for the month. I'll use WiFi or go without.
It doesn't matter what service - vzn, t-mobile, sprint, whatever. I'll only use their mobile data under duress.
4G is useless.
--
BMO
And also what really matters is what bathroom the pig goes into in North Carolina.
Cross-dressed pig or not, at least it's more dignified than Pat McCrory.
--
BMO
>Manning isn't disappeared
Just because we know where he is doesn't mean he's not disappeared. When you are put into solitary confinement with no contact with the outside world with no day-night cycle (they keep the lights on all the time) you have been thrown in a hole to be forgotten about.
BTW, long term solitary confinement is torture. Not all torture is physical.
And no, he's not in "protective custody" to prevent other inmates harming him. You can request and get out of protective custody (which is a form of solitary confinement) and people often do to take their chances in general population because pc is so awful.
>Snowden can't be pardoned because he hasn't been convicted.
You don't need to be convicted to get a pardon. Ford pardoned Nixon before any conviction happened. Your argument is invalid.
>The US doesn't want Assange evidenced by the fact that Greenwald is free
Greenwald is an old-school journalist and thus protected in the court of public opinion as well as by precedent. Assange isn't. Assange has been bad-mouthed enough that the general public doesn't give a shit about him and probably thinks he "deserves whatever happens to him." Going after Greenwald is a non-starter. Going after Assange will get someone promoted.
>Contrary to popular belief the US Foreign Intelligence services are not required to work within the Constitution or Bill of Rights
US foreign intelligence isn't supposed to spy on US citizens. That's a violation of my rights as a citizen. Fuck you for defending this.
How do those boots taste?
--
BMO
I can only agree with your post.
This makes me despondent.
--
BMO
Back when Ellsberg released the Pentagon Papers, there was an actual chance at fairness if you went to court, which is why Ellsberg is not in jail for the rest of his life.
Today? The possibility that anyone would get a fair shake in a courtroom is laughable.
Assange would do well to stay where he is, even if it feels confining. Because he would be disappeared like Chelsea They would bury him so deep in the system that death would be preferable.
--
BMOME-163B