Slashdot Mirror


Saudi Arabian Teen Arrested For Online Videos With American Blogger (theguardian.com)

Mazin Sidahmed and Nicky Woolf, reporting for The Guardian: A male Saudi Arabian teenager has been arrested in Riyadh over a series of online videos of conversations between him and a female Californian streaming-video star that went viral. A Riyadh police spokesperson, Colonel Fawaz Al-Mayman, said the teenager, known online as Abu Sin, was arrested on Sunday for engaging in "unethical behaviour" in videos with Christina Crockett, a popular broadcaster on the conversational live-streaming site YouNow. Abu Sin's real name is not known. "His videos received many comments and many of the commenters of the general public demanded for him to be punished for his actions," Al-Maymann added, according to the Saudi Gazette. The two amassed thousands of fans on the YouNow network, and later on YouTube after videos of the two speaking were uploaded there. The videos featured Abu Sin -- a nickname given to him for his broken teeth -- and Crockett communicating despite their significant language barriers. The popularity of the videos of the two of them surprised Crockett, she told the Guardian in an interview. As a broadcaster on YouNow, she can invite her fans to join her broadcasts on split-screen, which is known as "guesting."

213 comments

  1. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    So they had conversation. So what is the problem? It didn't come clear in this post at slashdot.

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He didn't scream "Alahu Akbar, death to infidels!" at a blonde girl, that's punishable by death if you are a sandnigger

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So they had conversation. So what is the problem?

      Islam

    3. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last word of the post is likely the main problem.

    4. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't talk to women. Its ok to hold hands with men tho. When you want to have illicit conversation with women you have to find a sneaky way like hiding your phone number under a piece of fruit in the supermarket. I'm sure there must be a legitimate way but its some kind of familial prearranged marriage bullshit.

    5. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can't talk to women. You can rape them though, even if they are barely old enough to bleed. And if they complain, they'll get convicted for extra marital sex. It's a great system.

    6. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really depends on the circumstances. There was a couple (man and woman) who were gang raped. The excuse was that they were being immoral unmarried and that they deserved what they got. If I remember correctly the lawyer (for the couple) lost his law license for bringing a bad name to country.

    7. Re: So? by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Should have used the more politically correct phrase, "dune coon."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Racist! \s

    9. Re:So? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2

      Racist! \s

      No, the poster is probably right..... Islamic countries are very strict on how you interact with the opposite sex...

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    10. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

    11. Re: So? by slasher999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Islam isn't a race, so not it's not.

    12. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.vocativ.com/underworld/sex/men-saudi-arabia-flirt-without-getting-thrown-jail/
      http://www.blueabaya.com/2011/02/dating-saudi-way.html

    13. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qatif_rape_case

    14. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Islam isn't a race, so not it's not.

      Sounds like something a racist would say.

    15. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, tagging it as flamebait in this case suits just fine, but modding down a no-nonsense post because one doesn't share OPs political opinion, or political correctness manners, is SJW crap.

    16. Re:So? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      He is living in a religio-fascist country with though-police.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be far more accurate to say "Arabs" as in that country they tend to be intolerant controlling fuckheads no matter what god they pray to.

    18. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


        Islamic countries are very strict on how you interact with the opposite sex...

      It varies greatly. Saudi Arabia is the worst, where women can't even drive. Iran is comparatively liberal, but still requires all women to cover their heads. Then there's countries like Morocco (which I've been to), which has few, if any restrictions.

      The Islamic world is far less homogeneous than the Christian one.

    19. Re:So? by tombak · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am Iranian and I grew up in an Islamic country (although I moved to Canada at the age of 16). I remember getting arrested for such egregious crimes as: 1) having long hair 2) talking to girls 3) one time just hanging out at a park with a group of friends! no girls this time. I got slapped around at the age of 15 by one of these "religion enforcement police" goons because he accused me of being gay because I had long hair (what??). They took me to jail and I was there till 3 AM and only after my mother begged and pleaded with them would they let me go. It was really hard watching my mother cry while surrounded by a bunch of goons. I had it relatively easy, but these Muslim fanatics have inflicted immeasurable suffering on so many young people in Iran/Saudi Arabia... Anyways, the problem IS Islam, and shame on you for saying he is racist. People like you confuse the issue due to their own ignorance. H

    20. Re:So? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      So they had conversation. So what is the problem?

      FTA:

      Crockett said. "He was dancing and being funny, we would both dance on there because we can't communicate with words. It was pretty funny."

      Saudi it pretty strict. Dancing may have been part of it.

      One of my colleagues (male) was in Saudi for a conference last year and was going to meet with someone (female) to go over a presentation they were working. She suggested they meet in her room. The hotel staff warned them that it was a crime for them to go to either of their rooms unless they were married or related. The punishment for him was jail, she wold have been stoned to death.

    21. Re:So? by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 2

      The "\s" conveys sarcasm.

    22. Re:So? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Glad that you made it out okay, and I really applaud you for recognizing the problem. Iranians who do that and apostetize - as in, become anything else - Atheist, Zoroastrian, Christian, Buddhist, et al, have hope. Those who claim that it's not Islam, it's the Mullahs, are clueless, and a part of the problem. It's not which imam is gonna run the country - it's the fact that imams run the country in the first place

    23. Re: So? by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Yes it is.

      It's a race to the bottom.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    24. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this modded insightful? A law defined and followed by a country (irrespective of how absurd or orthodox or insane it may be) does not necessarily mean that such a law is derived from a religion followed by the majority of the country's citizens.

    25. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you completely retarded?

      Name a non-islamic country with a similar law, if not the please STFU.

    26. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bingo. it is an ideology like marxism. actually very similar in practice.

    27. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in my experience, iranians are much more respectful of their hist nation than the sunnis.

    28. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiots post links to eiki where wiki says "Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name" wtf? right

    29. Re: So? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You stole the comment I wanted to make! Great, now you'll get to the bottom before I do.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    30. Re:So? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Noooo, it's all a pure coincidence that highly religious countries tend to have retarded laws...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    31. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is not only islam.. It's the same for all organized religions...

    32. Re:So? by Copid · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it was just for dancing and not for witchcraft. They should count themselves lucky.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    33. Re:So? by Copid · · Score: 1

      All organized religions? So if we look at any religious country of any sect, we'll find religious enforcers slapping teenagers around and arresting them for their hair length or talking to girls?

      Are all organized religions inherently the same, or is their sameness right now just an interesting historical coincidence?

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    34. Re:So? by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

      Racist! \s

      No, the poster is probably right..... Islamic countries are very strict on how you interact with the opposite sex...

      Since when being right is any defense against being accused of racism?

      --
      Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    35. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's racists all the way down

    36. Re: So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we'll find religious enforcers slapping teenagers around and arresting them for their hair length or talking to girls?"

      Yes, pretty much. In any religion (though it's not restricted to religion) you'll find people who will readily use threats, coercion and violence to control others if they can get away with it and of course young people make the best, most malleable victims. Spare the rod and spoil the child etc.

    37. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was dancing with a girl (albeit half a planet away) and acting in a fashion that is considered unbecoming in their culture. A better question is how was he found out? Who was watching this inappropriate behavior and why have they not been punished?

    38. Re:So? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Are you perhaps located in Saudi Arabia? The link works fine for me.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  2. oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He talked with a woman! Unclean! Unclean!

    1. Re: oh my god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but our communist retards, like clinton an merkel, embrace these nasty folks.

      see how corrupt our leaders are.

  3. What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any news sources that actually describe the specific "unethical" thing he did? The summary and article don't.

    1. Re:What did he do? by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1

      Participated in an online video with a woman who didn't have her face covered. That and I think they danced a little bit.

    2. Re:What did he do? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      I'm more surprised anyone really wants to live in Saudi Arabia, but some folks like that kind of totalitarian nonsense...

    3. Re:What did he do? by cecurry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, how could anyone "want" to live where their family is and their entire genetic line has existed for several millennia? Why don't they just pack up and move someplace better? Because it's easy.

    4. Re:What did he do? by rhazz · · Score: 1

      And we just sold them tanks.

    5. Re:What did he do? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Funny

      To be fair a little dance is a slippery slope.

      First you do a little dance, that leads to making a little love, and then you get down tonight. Get down tonight.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    6. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We? So what role did you personally have in selling them tanks?

    7. Re:What did he do? by cecurry · · Score: 0

      He's aware of it, and now he's making YOU aware of it, and in a democratic society that's enough to do something about it.

    8. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He financed their construction.

    9. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm more surprised anyone really wants to live in Saudi Arabia, but some folks like that kind of totalitarian nonsense...

      That's like saying you are surprised anyone really wants to live in North Korea. It demonstrates a profound failure to understand the human condition. Let me sum it up for you -- "The country has a lot of problems, but it is still my country."

      That line of thinking applies to every country on the planet.

    10. Re:What did he do? by ScentCone · · Score: 2

      He financed their construction.

      Well, that's not entirely clear. If the Saudis bought them, then the Saudis financed them. If the Saudis bought them for less than what they cost, then either the manufacturer(s) subsidized some of the cost, or the taxpayers did. Which brings us to the fact that such expenses come out of the discretionary budget, which means it's essentially paid for almost entirely by income taxes or by debt that will be serviced by income taxes ... and that means that only about half of the people in the country actually have a hand in financing such things because the other half pays no income taxes. And of the half that does pay them, of course a small portion of that group pays the majority of those taxes.

      So, "we" is indeed not an obvious thing, here.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:What did he do? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      Yep, if you don't nip this in the bud, pretty soon women will be demanding to leave the house without their husband's permission.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Or really, I'm a 'westerner' and chatted and spoke to and even Skype with a very nice girl in the mud east. A small country which is very wealthy and very conservative. We met online for programming help if all things. At first I though she was a guy. She had to pretend to be a guy because women are not allowed to be indescrminant. And youth - when a girl and Huy get together, it almost always leads to passion and hormones. Or, too young mothrrs, fatherless children. When I found out he was a she I immeditaly was interested. HumN nature. Then something clicked during our chats and we fell in love.

      She was in school, and knew she would be arranged to be married. Her brother would choose the guy he thought best. From the people he knew. Unless I could get there and kinda of setup our meeting and become friends and then maybe, just maybe he would introduce us.

      So much had to be done. I had financial issues cause from health. It was sad. This girl was so nice and so kind and very smart and if course beautiful. From the royal line too which made her so down to earth (as a women).

      I watched her graduate. I could still not get there in time. A year and a half later, she messaged me she was engaged. She said he was ok, 'but not you'.

      I know her brother choose wisely. He was careful. I know she will be happy.

      We tend to not realize when you grow up a certain way, it is accepted as normal. Arranged marriage is normal there. With exceptions. And we tend to forget that being young, we make mistakes. Young Guy and girls will have sex if they can. We were even talking about meeting to see each other and if we could restrain oursekves.

      Now, most guys here in america will never have a virgin girl. When you are her first. It is significant.

      Well, it's a whole other topic. I had experience with this cultural difference. Would it be so bad if our 12 year old daughters were not out fucking and sucking whoever will take advantage of them. They don't have developed minds. They do stuff they should not. Even for a single position of the risk of pregnancy. Who can say we all would be better off if young guys didn't get young girls pregnant. They can't go to school. Their life's are ruined. Sure, some make it. Just a small percentage.

      And there is only a couple ways to insure they don't meet up and get naked.

      This is just a different view and solution to an obvious problem. Culturally does it work? Yes.

      She told me a love marriage is what she wanted. Love. I never heard of a love marriage. Love is just implied right?

    13. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but the entire reason that Baptists frown on premarital sex is because it leads to dancing.

      CAPTCHA: Raptures

      Fucking really? Hahahahaha

    14. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that I think it does say, but it's so weird and alien that you totally missed it.

      In some other galaxy, they are talking about a similar news story. In that story, Florbnax the Liberal Democracy and Gleepligs the Type II Perversion were having a long-distance conversation, using an anti-matter bomb flash to transmit each bit? Don't you see the problem here?

      It's pretty obvious, isn't it? I mean, the glaring ethical failure here could barely be any more explicit.

      Of course you see the ethical problem, because everyone knows that in that galaxy's culture, it's very bad form to communicate with someone who isn't whitelisted on the galactic spam-control register. And since everyone is intimately familiar with the whitelist (I mean, you grew up with it all the hundreds of thousands of years of your life), it's pretty damn obvious that one of the above names isn't on it. Couldn't possibly be on it.

      Oh, you puny human. You didn't know this basic ethical guideline? And you didn't even know the contents of the whitelist?! Well, first, I just want to say that you totally disgust me. But beyond that, I should add that ignorance of ethics is no excuse for violations.

      As an analogy, I'll try to explain it, though. You know how, on your planet, everyone knows that a girl obviously cannot possibly be on the whitelist, so there aren't any conditions where it's ok for a person to talk to them? Gleepligs' screwup was kind of like that...

    15. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem really naive and inexperienced. I would not be surprised if she was pulling you by the nose the entire time, while you were blinded as obsessed as many guys get in online relationships like that.

    16. Re: What did he do? by Stickasylum · · Score: 1

      It's for their own good, right? Wouldn't it be great if we didn't have to put up with all these "used" women and sloppy seconds?

    17. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was not the point. It's just a different point of view. Hell, I am used. I been with 3 real virgins. I'm the used one then. But so what. And same for the girls. Naive, yes. There was no way it could ever work. Not fake. There were too many photos, live video calls, and tons of other stuff not typical of a 'cat fish'. Especially the inclusive asking for money part.

      From match.com, lol. Yes. i tried it briefly. 2/4 women were the scammers. 2 were nice, one liked sex a lot. Lol. I know the difference. I think of that experience pleasantly. Biased, yes. But she never asked for anything. Except me. Of course you wouldn't or couldn't know much of the thing from a single post. Not enough to make any conclusions.

      An interesting experience. Until you actually have in depth discussions with the 'wronged' party, what do you really know about what they think.

      I checked back here and wascsurprised; usually no one responds to anon.

    18. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the Saudis bought them, then the Saudis financed them.

      Did they?

      If I go to a car dealership, and I buy a car, people don't generally say that I financed the construction of that car.

      Of course, if I went to some custom car builder, gave them a boatload of money, and said "build my dream car", yes, in that case I did finance the construction of the car.

      It isn't clear if this falls under the former, latter, or something else.

    19. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's easy.

      You're going for facetious but you're right on point. It IS that easy. The world is a small tiny place. Until we start colonising Mars we're barely 30h worth of travel distance from anyone at any given time. If the goal is to simply get away from a shithole, heck you can do that in 4-5 hours for most of them.

      I personally really don't understand the obsession people have with a place. It's just a place. There are many places in the world each with their own benefits. If one isn't completely happy with where they are, go someplace else.

      By the way, greetings from the Netherlands. An awesome country which I didn't grow up in, don't have any family in and don't have a genetic line relating back to. I do miss my sister, so I called her up a few days ago and then booked a flight. Going to have a fun weekend abroad next week.

    20. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people in movie trailers say that little sex will lead to dancing. Dancing is a sin. And getting them down tonight.

    21. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck anyone with a genetic line that has existed for several millennia in the same place. They can choke on a bag of dicks.

    22. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is pretty much how the Western Hemisphere was colonized over the last few centuries (and probably 10-20,000 years ago via the Bering Strait/land-bridge) - nothing so unusual for humans...

      RO

    23. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad did just that you butthole. So did my uncle and cousins and extended family. All the goddamn legal slow way. There is a reason people want to live. It is a societal shit hole.

    24. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      I'm more surprised anyone really wants to live in Saudi Arabia, but some folks like that kind of totalitarian nonsense...

      Not exactly Saudi Arabia, but you have Janet Jackson who married a Qatari sheikh and moved to Qatar, which is a Wahabi country like Saudi Arabia. Similar shit

    25. Re:What did he do? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      You're going for facetious but you're right on point. It IS that easy. The world is a small tiny place. Until we start colonising Mars we're barely 30h worth of travel distance from anyone at any given time. If the goal is to simply get away from a shithole, heck you can do that in 4-5 hours for most of them.

      I'm not sure it is that "easy" if you consider how "immigration" works differently in different places. Some people would lover to get out of the shithole, but then it is impossible politically, financial, and/or economically because of where they are at the time (or where they want to go). Talking is easy. Doing it is a completely different story...

    26. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cecurry turned out to be right. B'cos it is easy - the way Saudis can just pick up visas at a travel office in US embassies in their country (in sharp contrast to other countries). Also, becoming a citizen is easy if one have at least something like $250k that you can bring into the country.

      As far as places go, a place is a place in the US - you have a uniform standard of living anywhere and everywhere. It's different from third world countries, where typically, the capital and a few major cities are decently livable, but other places are dumpsters. I'm not sure whether that's the case in KSA - they do have enough cash to make the entire country filled w/ El Dorados, but then again, since the 50s, they had been more busy funding mosques, madrassahs, dawa and jihadi groups worldwide that they may have overlooked the part where you can use money to make your desert country a real paradise.

    27. Re: What did he do? by mi · · Score: 1

      when a girl and Huy get together, it almost always leads to passion and hormones.

      One of the more hilarious typos for sure...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    28. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So fuck all black people in Africa, got it.

    29. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he is a saudi propaganda operative. smell the coffee !

    30. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bingo. the saudis are the modern day nazis. and clinton bush merkel prince of wales - all in bed with them.

    31. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or driving cars by themselves.

      Heretics.

    32. Re:What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world is a small tiny place.

      Do us here on slashdot a favor. Step away from the computer and walk around the world. Then get back to us about how it is a "small tiny place."

      Thanks.

    33. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past men could marry female children.

      That's why they were not "out fucking and sucking".

      You propose victorian feminism as the solution to modern feminism.
      Go pound sand fucktard.

      Here is a solution:

      Deuteronomy 22 28-29: man keeps young girl he raped, pays father some money.

      And anyone who entices you to another god/judge/ruler gets killed, so the pedos keep marrying cute young girls and anyone that has a problem with that marrys the ground.

      Man is ba'al (master) in deuteronomy. (English speakers are taught ba'al is a demon, when it is a word that means "master", which was applied to both gods and men.

      >In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.

    34. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not the point then you are a beta faggot.

      Child brides or world-wide holocaust should be the options on the table.

    35. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Having done it multiple times I can say that most countries do not place financial on the list, and when they do they do it for select countries. Politically also works in peoples favour in many places. This is also not new. I look at some cities in the Netherlands and they have had a majority immigrant population for a really long time. My airport taxi driver was Iranian and had been here for 35 years. Not wealthy, not well off, just didn't want to be there anymore. My sister grew up in Australia. She and her boyfriend said fuck it we're moving to Vienna recently and so she did. Sure there's paperwork but for the most part I look around and I see people of all colours, accents, backgrounds, wherever I go. People from war torn countries who are recent immigrants are easier to pick out on their inability to speak local languages than people who have been here for a long time. This has been universal in every country I've been in (except for China and Japan, very few immigrants there).

      Yeah we may not all be able to go straight from being bombed to sipping martinis in Aruba, but to claim that immigration is some incredibly complicated thing to the point where its bad enough that you happily remain in a wasteland is more a reflection of the lack of effort.

    36. Re:What did he do? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      B'cos it is easy - the way Saudis can just pick up visas at a travel office in US embassies in their country (in sharp contrast to other countries). Also, becoming a citizen is easy if one have at least something like $250k that you can bring into the country.

      Yeah because the USA is the only destination to go to that makes the GP right. /sarcasm

      Heck given the choice between the USA and the middle east I'm sure some would prefer the desert shithole. In the mean time there are many countries far more welcoming to immigrants and you really can just pickup and move. ... Like my Iranian taxi driver who's been here for a few years now. Not wealthy, not well connected, just didn't want to live in Iran anymore so he upped with his family and came to europe. No claiming assylum, nothing but a standard immigration process which most countries don't treat with hostility... Unlike the USA... Who are even hostile towards tourists.

    37. Re: What did he do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When can we expect Janet Jackson to be arrested for dancing on YouTube?

    38. Re:What did he do? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You are right. If one is a Muslim w/ any amount of devotion, and has a skill that's desired by any business tycoon in the GCC countries, then it's a far better idea to settle in one of those countries. Just like the family of clock boy Achmet.

      We're talking here about a Saudi guy who does not care for such rules, and who's now arrested for that. For him, he'd have done better by first getting out of there and then entertaining himself and anyone else this way. Although if he just knows Arabic, that would potentially be an issue - since there are no non-Muslim Arab countries.

    39. Re: What did he do? by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      ;)

  4. What behavior? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the behavior he is guilty of?

  5. Ah, Saudi Arabia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Exhibit A why we should get off oil: no more money for that fundamentalist wacko government.

    1. Re:Ah, Saudi Arabia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know Saudi Arabia's Highway Patrol fleet cars are Lamborghinis?

    2. Re:Ah, Saudi Arabia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they're not, your confusing them with Italy, UAE, Los Angeles and Miami all of which do have one or more lambo's as police cars.

    3. Re:Ah, Saudi Arabia by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In those countries, do people buy anything other than Mercs, Beamers, Porsches and so on?

  6. SJW by Major+Blud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the sort of thing that SJW's should be fighting against......instead they decide to focus their efforts on restricting speech in some of the most liberal places on Earth.

    --
    If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    1. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Meanwhile on Slashdot the only people actually acting like SJWs are the people who use the term SJW...

    2. Re:SJW by The-Ixian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because they are mutually exclusive? That's kind of a myopic view of the world you have there...

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    3. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And anyone who speaks up against the crimes these countries perpetrate is also attacked. Hitchens, Dawkins, etc were all lambasted for telling the truth.

    4. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJW's don't criticize Muslims because it doesn't fit into their narrative that white men are to blame for everything.

    5. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 0

      "SJW"s has become sort of a nebulous term, with many self-proclaimed "SJW"s attacking individuals for non-sensical things (such as the "Hugh Mungus" incident). But social justice also includes the civil rights movement, which is an organization against real problems. And in general, social justice activists should be concentrating on actions that they can change. Americans who are concerned about social justice should be primarily concerned about what they can do in America, for instance. Many people ARE concerned with the rights of Saudi's and others, but when it comes to action, there is only so much effort people can expend, and it ought to be concentrated on where it can be most effected. This is assuming, of course, that we're talking about those really concerned about social justice, of course, and not the individuals ranting on the internet for the sake of ranting, which costs nothing and does very little to no good.

    6. Re:SJW by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...except these social justice types lose any sense of perspective and end up supporting absurd things, repressive regimes, and leaders that support or benefit from repressive regimes.

      Liberals kind of jumped the shark. These days they excuse all sorts of nonsense that the classic civil rights movement would have nothing to do with.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Because they are mutually exclusive?"

      When you spend 90% of your time arguing against one and put much more effort and resources behind it, while the other you say is horrible and then move on ...

      Yes, yes they are mutually exclusive. People can consume only so many messages during a day, a week, a month. When one message consumes vastly more of that time that is the one that we care about ... or so is impressed upon people. It's why a reduction in a particular crime can seem like an increase because the news talks about it more. Something that is not as severe a problem or a problem for only a few seems so much more important than something that kills or harms 1000s more people.

    8. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be implying that george soros' personal army has a presence in areas where women and minorities are actually oppressed, that's simply not the case.

      There's no mistake that the SJWs all focus on western countries, they are the target of cultural marxism.

    9. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, there are those who attempt to wave away any concept of social justice or activism with a broad generalizations without a single example, let alone any evidence?

    10. Re:SJW by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      ...No they don't. You're just afraid that they do.

    11. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the sort of thing that SJW's should be fighting against......instead they decide to focus their efforts on restricting speech in some of the most liberal places on Earth.

      Hello, McFly? You expect people who live on the other side of the planet to affect Saudi policies? Exactly how would that work? People always focus on the problems where they live, because that's where they fucking live.

    12. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Mr. Clueless, how have you been?

    13. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 0

      Your comment is the height of laziness and ignorance. If you really want social justice, you go out and you work for it. There are people sitting in prison as we speak because they sacrificed something through civil disobedience in the hope of making society better. And here you are behind a computer screen telling those people what they should be fighting against. If you don't like what's happening in Saudi Arabia, then YOU go do something about it. There are plenty of people who are.

    14. Re:SJW by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      This is the sort of thing that SJW's should be fighting against......instead they decide to focus their efforts on restricting speech in some of the most liberal places on Earth.

      You would think they would, but in that part of the world, you would get your teeth kicked out by the police and your ass thrown in a hole and turned loose whenever they feel like it.

      Not like here in the States where they have 'rights'

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    15. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is that the exact same arguments were made about the "classic civil rights movement" at the time. Like how Tommie Smith and John Carlos protested the anthem at the 1968 olympics and were kicked out off the team in response. People like you cite them as legit in order to denigrate Kaerpnick while they themselves support Kaepernick.

      You don't even know you are a cliche.

    16. Re:SJW by ScentCone · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Meanwhile on Slashdot the only people actually acting like SJWs are the people who use the term SJW...

      No. Calling out liberal totalitarians is not the same as seeking to actually DO the things (like squelching speech through the power of government) that liberal totalitarians actually do. Though you are performing the approved-by-liberal-elites correct response to being called out - immediately lie about it in hopes that will deflect reality.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    17. Re:SJW by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's because the people who run around screaming about "social justice" do that primarily to distract from the fact that justice is the LAST thing they actually want. How about providing some examples of people who stamp their feet, shout down speakers at colleges, and otherwise rant away ... being actually constructive people interested in open conversation rather than repression of anyone deemed insufficiently onboard with their agenda? Some specific examples to counter the well-earned broad brush of derision would be helpful. But what are you going to trot out ... BLM? Occupy Everything? The Eat The Rich With Bernie Sanders movement? People who insist we switch all pronouns to "it?"

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    18. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it's because SJWs seem to have all the energy in the world to fight windmill giants like microagressions and the Patriarchy (insert x-files tune here), but yet there are nowhere to be seen when it comes to legitimate instances oppression. SJWs are not about doing the "right thing" (tm), they are about experiencing the moral gratification without doing any of the hard work required.

      Oh and #notallsjws

    19. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical SJW action. Instead of making the world a better place through actions, they waste the time of anyone that disagrees with them by requiring evidence of everything no matter how trivial, then ignoring that evidence and going along with their speaking points anyway. There is a word for people that do that: bigot.

      You become what you hate most.

    20. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 1

      Here's an example: http://talkasia.net/2016/09/28... There are people doing things about things, and not just whining on twitter or slashdot. These people are why we have 8 hour workdays and why we no longer have slavery.

    21. Re:SJW by cecurry · · Score: 1

      Yes, why "waste time" by backing up our believes with evidence when we could be enjoying the grand delusion we have in our comfortable worldview without contradictions and consequences?

    22. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I am an SJW. Hell, I don't even know what a microagression is. They're bad, "you'll know them when you see them", and I use the phrase several times a week just to get my rocks off. I'm just a real life troll hiding behind a retarded movement.

    23. Re:SJW by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile on Slashdot the only people actually acting like SJWs are the people who use the term SJW...

      No. Calling out PROGRESSIVE totalitarians is not the same as seeking to actually DO the things (like squelching speech through the power of government) that PROGRESSIVE totalitarians actually do. Though you are performing the approved-by-liberal-elites correct response to being called out - immediately lie about it in hopes that will deflect reality.

      FTFY - While I agree that the progressives have co-opted the liberal title, the reality is that the fascists that we have in government trying to take away your constitutional rights to free speech (oh noes its hate speech, ban it!), gun ownership (guns are bad, right?) or religion (your religion doesn't agree with my world view, therefore I must sue you and take away your livelihood) or association (no, you can't have a male only fraternity) are all PROGRESSIVES who use the label of liberal but generally wouldn't know a true liberal if one bit them in the ass. Very liberal people are known as libertarians, and they have all shifted to the Republican party because the Democrat party is full of fascist Progressives that are diametrically opposed to classical liberalism.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    24. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, I'll bite here and here. If you need a larger pool of examples you can find them here.

    25. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's some activists out there that manage to pull off events that gain world news attention for specific causes without being physically there.

      Even if the actual impact of the event itself is nil, they still managed to put issues on the other side of the planet into the global spotlight.

    26. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell those people that you mentioned at the end to stop being so fucking loud so we can hear the sensible ones.

    27. Re:SJW by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sibling post makes a really important point. Let go of the word "liberal" and let it return to the wild. It's a good word than needs to go find itself and discover its original meaning. The fascists in question call themselves "progressives" - let's go with that.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    28. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..along with using their cause as a club or excuse to be an asshole. They're not particularly different from any person who co-opts a cause for their own benefit, and often at the expense of the cause (no, upper-middle class white cis straight girl on tumblr, reblogging 'die cis scum' does not further trans rights, it's just being an asshole.)

    29. Re:SJW by lgw · · Score: 1

      The contrast is stark, isn't it? "People with real problems putting their lives at risk" vs "I was microagressed, where is my safe space?"

      That contrast is why so much derision is heaped upon "SJW"s, and Keyboard Warriors of all stripes.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    30. Re:SJW by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      "SJWs" do fight against stuff like this, and they do it all the time. This story was on BoingBoing two days ago, for instance. That site is about SJW-y as they get.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    31. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is called communism, marxism or SPARTA.

    32. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, the sjw marxists in reality team up with the muselmans to destroy the great civilization of the white fathers.

      according to your rotten logic we should bend over to mohammedism.

    33. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not voting clinton, bush, blair, cameron reduces the power of the wahabist nazis.

    34. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you lack power, you go after the weaker target. for example, you pursue Salman Rushdie rather than William Burroughs, because Burroughs owned guns and knew how to use them.

  7. So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused, even after reading the article. Nowhere does it mention what law was broken in Saudi Arabia causing the kid to be arrested. Forgive my ignorance on Saudi Law, but it does come as a surprise to me that simply engaging in a conversation with an attractive white female from the U.S. was grounds for arrest.

    1. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgive my ignorance on Saudi Law, but it does come as a surprise to me that simply engaging in a conversation with an attractive white female from the U.S. was grounds for arrest.

      Really? Do you live under a rock or something?

    2. Re:So....why was he arrested? by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Saudi Arabia has laws banning men from engaging in any form of socializing with any women they aren't married or related to. Public lashing is a common punishment for those offenses, too, so it's not just a few days in jail that he's facing.

    3. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Verdatum · · Score: 2

      Saudi Arabia has a whole set of laws governing how single men and women are allowed to interact with each other. I think it's a terrible idea to extend these laws to online interaction with foreigners. But, apparently, enough people over there think it is appropriate enough a thing to do that an arrest was made.

    4. Re:So....why was he arrested? by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      But woman in video isn't subject to those laws, thus this interaction can't be in the scope of the law.

    5. Re:So....why was he arrested? by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Look, all that really matters is that Hillary Clinton has the Saudis' backs, as long as they give her family a bunch more cash.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:So....why was he arrested? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      But woman in video isn't subject to those laws

      No, but unfortunately, as a Saudi, the man in this case certainly is.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that will work. Guaranteed 100% perfect defense.

    8. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But woman in video isn't subject to those laws, thus this interaction can't be in the scope of the law.

      She isn't, but he still is. Think of it this way, in most places, forceful penetration is the standard for rape. Women cant break that law, but that does not mean that men are exempt from it too.

    9. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like it stopped any government before.

    10. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Snufu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Christina: 'Today we are having our follow up split-screen live stream with Abu Sin in Riyahd. What up Abu!'
      Abu appears in the split screen. He is in the middle of a public square, his hands are bound to a pole and his shirt is removed. In the background is crowd of onlookers and a large masked man in black unrolling a whip.
      Abu: 'Whassup Christina Just chillin since our last stream, Yo!'
      Christina: 'Cool. Do you like Beyonce?'
      Abu: 'Totally, but my AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.... favorite is Justin Beiber.'

    11. Re:So....why was he arrested? by lgw · · Score: 1

      forceful penetration is the standard for rape. Women cant break that law,

      Wow, you really abstain from internet porn, don't you? I have to say I admire your restraint.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:So....why was he arrested? by lgw · · Score: 0

      Wow, I'd have to say in that case that justice was served! Would public floggings for all Beiber fans be overkill?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:So....why was he arrested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beiber fans with mod points - what is Slashdot coming to?

  8. The Saudi government is barbaric by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 2

    It will be interesting to see whether continuing incidents like these over the next several years spark enough domestic and international outrage that totlitarian regimes are forced to change their governing practices.

    1. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Major+Blud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      next several years spark enough domestic.

      International, yes, but domestic, hardly. I'm willing to bet that the highly conservative muslim population of Saudi Arabia is in favor of these sort of things.

      If you look at the results of Arab Spring, the totalitarian regimes that were overthrown and replaced with "democratic" ones were done so with what I would not call forward-thinking progressive governments.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    3. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oppression isn't something a person decides they're in favor of. Oppression is something a person is told they're in favor of. Then, they simply parrot it.

    4. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil.

      Well, that and what given a bunch of cash to the Clinton family will get you, of course.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Captain+Scurvy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      That dynamic has changed radically with U.S. LTO shattering oil prices and turning the United States into the new swing producer. The Saudis are already being forced to restructure their entire government, and while their cheap oil reserves still make them a major player, their influence in that regard has been severely curtailed. t. petroleum engineer

    6. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the U.S. is a net exporter of oil now this argument falls a bit flat.

    7. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Just this week a U.S. President tried to veto an overwhelmingly popular bill that let U.S. citizens sue Saudi Arabia for their role in 9-11. So it seems a bit premature to declare their influence in American politics dead. Though it is an encouraging sign that at least Congress has the balls to stand up to them at least a little now--though only when the public overwhelmingly demands them to.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You genuinely believe that donations to the Clinton Foundation is what keeps them in power and unpunished? rofl

    9. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with that bill is very simple- what's stopping other countries from passing the same stupid law in their country so their citizens can sue Americans?
      Nada.
      So, in crossing that Rubicon first, we just green-lighted everyone else to do the same.

    10. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by aralin · · Score: 1

      It does help not to be listed on the spinning wheel of countries that we are going to regime change when we re-spin it next time. In 2001 Iraq won followed by 2003 Afghanistan, 2005 winner Iran was delayed, 2007 winner was Paraguay and I believe next time it was Hillary as Sec of State picking contestants in 2009 when Syria won and 2011 when Egypt won, but she lied and said it was Libya. She was out for 2013 Ukraine and 2015 winner Brazil, but she is expected to oversee personally the 2017,19, 21 and 23 drawings. :)

      But Clinton Foundation would not be enough, fighting for us the war in Yemen is certainly much more in line with the magnitude of payments we require.

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    11. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Tis a cogent rationale, while accurate, it is, however premised on a protectionist foundation; which is not entirely garbage, but primarily serves the short-term outlook at the expense of the future.
      I'll provide an example: if you own a liquor store whose primary customers are abusive drunks, it could be said that tolerating their indiscretions *is* itself an indiscretion, however, it does allow you to stay in business, because otherwise, they may retaliate, or go to another liquor store if you demand they clean-up their act before you will continue to do business with them. In the end, this only serves to expand the sum-total of indiscretions. The world becomes a nastier place.

    12. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you're a petroleum engineer then you should realise the incredible power that the Saudis and their cheap oil have over the expensive and hard to process North American crap. Heck the entire industry and countries all over the world breathed a collective sigh of relief at the announcement from OPEC this week.

      The dynamic has changed ... slightly. Not radically. You couldn't even remotely use the word "radically". Heck since we lifted sanctions on Iran we saw how little influence we really have and the past 2 years has seen oil and gas in the USA suffer greatly as a result of strategic decisions from OPEC nations.

    13. Re: The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The international community will gladly take US assets abroad as compensation for any perceived slight and then point at our own law that passed a presidential veto. I don't think we should be allies with the Saudis, but this is not the best road to disentanglement.

    14. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Ost99 · · Score: 1

      With the exception of Tunisia. They seem to have elected mostly sane people.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
    15. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      You genuinely believe that donations to the Clinton Foundation is what keeps them in power and unpunished? rofl

      Why would I believe something that you made up in your own head to fight as a strawman? Oh, I get it. Because you're hoping that by distracting with that juvenile rhetorical technique, that people will forget that the Clintons DO in fact rake in millions of dollars for their own family and cronies (only a sliver of their foundation's revenue goes to anything other than internal paychecks and perks/expenses) in exchange for providing political access to those who pile on the cash. Of course you know this, and are trying to wish it away. Especially the part where she was encouraging that while she was in office, giving lots of access to those who paid her husband. But do carry on, and pretend it didn't happen. Feel better now?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    16. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia will never have to change as long as they have oil. Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

      Actually, the price of oil continuously declining will lead to the same effect. Also, w/ new oil reserves in Canada and US, as well as Russia too struggling to get more cash, there is only gonna be more downward pressure on their prices

    17. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Copid · · Score: 1

      Don't you know? Saudi Arabia has always been a pariah in American government and only just recently with the rise of Hillary Clinton has it started to work its way into the halls of power over here. Selling the Saudis weapons and ignoring their human rights abuses is a totally new thing, just started in 2016!

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    18. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Copid · · Score: 1

      Well, when the oppressed revolt against the oppressors and take over the government, more often than not they decide that maybe oppression isn't so bad after all. Most of human history isn't a struggle to end oppression so much as a battle over whose turn it is to hold the whip.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    19. Re:The Saudi government is barbaric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a home for a few of the most sacred locations on earth for Islam. It will likely be the very last place this kind if thing changes. As it stands, the royalty live in constant fear of being replaced by a theocracy, so they are not going to do anything to anger the religious zealots.

  9. This, and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is coming. To the US and all other nations.
    Extradition to another country for violating their laws, religious views or sexual morals.
    Glad I am retiring, and becoming a tech luddite.

  10. this is a cultural issue, not a technology issue. by nimbius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think its terrible and I dont think he deserves it

    which is a pretty reasonable response, but what most Americans don't understand or for that matter tend to respect are cultural differences. Theyre quick to point out the injustice of the Saudi criminal code yet conveniently overlook the fact that it is a criminal offence to dance at the Jefferson Memorial, or that until 1967 interracial marriages were illegal in a plurality of states. Transgender Americans can still face prosecution for simply using the toilet in 5 states, and it wasnt until 2015 that gays could be married in the land of the free.

    Abu Sin knew what he was doing. Sometimes incarceration is a risk you take to try and make a cultural change or statement.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  11. Hillary was there first by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation has accepted tens of millions of dollars in donations from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Algeria and Brunei â" all of which the State Department has faulted over their records on sex discrimination and other human-rights issues.

    The department's 2011 human rights report on Saudi Arabia, the last such yearly review prepared during Mrs. Clinton's tenure, tersely faulted the kingdom for "a lack of equal rights for women and children" and said violence against women, human trafficking and gender discrimination, among other abuses, were all "common" there.

    Saudi Arabia has been a particularly generous benefactor to the Clinton Foundation, giving at least $10 million since 2001, according to foundation disclosures. At least $1 million more was donated by Friends of Saudi Arabia, co-founded by a Saudi prince.

    Source: New York Times.

    VOTE HILLARY 2016! A vote for Hillary is a vote for the Saudis. A vote for Hillary is a vote for the Trans-Pacific Partnership. She supports both of these causes, if you agree with her, then she is definitely your candidate.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:Hillary was there first by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not just Hillary, but pretty much every U.S. politician for decades now. Oil trumps morality any day, and it also crosses all party lines.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Hillary was there first by halivar · · Score: 1

      Oil trumps morality any day, and it also crosses all party lines.

      TRIGGERED.

    3. Re:Hillary was there first by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Please list all the politicians who have taken millions from the Saudis to purchase access to their office. 1. The Clinton Foundation.

      She took their dirty money and knew exactly what she was doing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Hillary was there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's chump change, bitch! The Saudi king purportedly gave G.W. Bushie $25 million for his presidential library.

  12. ephrasing Gilmore's Law for modern times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Internet treats freedom as damage and routes around it."

    That much better fits the world of 2016 than his original form.

  13. Some day the world will run out of oil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be a long time in the future and I'm not likely to be here. It would be nice to see the Saudis pulling their Mercedes and Rolls Royces across the desert using camels. The future is for countries to invest in a diverse economy with the ability to quickly adjust to changing times. So far the Saudis and others only have an economy based on liquid potential energy and sand.

  14. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your entire post makes no sense. First off there is no law about dancing at the Jefferson memorial, it is however an issue to demonstrate without a permit and then refuse to leave when the police order it. As for everything else in your post, how is anyone ignoring it? Is american law perfect, no. But it is still a fuckton better then laws in the middle east.

    Also on the gay thing, there is a vast difference between "marriage is not permitted" and "public beheading". Even if you don't support gay marriage, there is no moral dishonesty to say that murdering them may be slightly overkill.

  15. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Abu Sin knew what he was doing. Sometimes incarceration is a risk you take to try and make a cultural change or statement.

    Abu Sin was a young boy talking to a woman. To say he fully understood the ramifications of his actions is absurd. He almost certainly knew it was a social taboo, but to say he was trying to make cultural change is really stretching. We do not know his intentions, but Occam says hormonal teenager trumps activist any day.

    That said, this probably happens quite a bit with teenagers, just not out in the open. Then, afterwards, after the physical and mental scarring endured, these young men learn hate. And that hate is not towards his oppressors, the regime and religion that beat him down. Instead it is twisted at women or those who do as they did, that they should suffer the same punishments. This is how these types of systems stay in place and prosper.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  16. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in the same category regardless of the punishment. American's far from free and imprisons peaceful people routinely. I say this as someone who is persecuted by the US, and its hypocritical society. One need not commit violence to be severely punished. A severe lashing and 3 years in prison is hardly all that much relative to what the US does to many peaceful people for little more than political speech. The US is imprisoning people routinely for anywhere between 5-10 years and life for a variety of communication related crimes. The idea that it doesn't happen is a matter of perspective and a social construct/norm/expectancy. Just because we think something is horrible doesn't justify these things when nobody is actually harmed, and that is exactly the same situation as the Saudi here.

  17. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    You're undoing your own argument. Culturally, nobody gives a damn if you dance at the Jefferson Memorial, though some people might give a damn if a bunch of people wasted time writing and fussing about legislation to change that law that nobody cares about. On your other topics, you've made your own counterpoint. Culturally, the west has moved very quickly on areas like gay marriage. In practical terms, it's a done deal. There will be lots of little rough edges to clean up for a few years yet. Meanwhile, the Wahabbists and their ilk in the Middle East are going full-throttle backwards into the medieval days they miss so badly.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  18. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll do anything to avoid saying "Islam", won't you? You use mental gymnastics and false equivalency so you don't feel like such a racist. But you know what the score REALLY is.

  19. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    > Once again religion demonstrates it's worthlessness.

    Oh please, its not "religion." Its fucking human nature. Stalin was the biggest killer in modern history Mao Zedung the second and Hitler was probably third. The first two were officially atheist the last was only nominally christian because that's just what white people in germany were.

    As long as you are focused on "religion" as the cause of the problem rather than just another neutral tool that can be co-opted you are never going to improve the world. Know your enemy.

  20. Fuck that entire culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck it. The sooner it is wiped off this earth the better.

  21. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The world is not weird, it is the people.
    Religion is not stupid, it is the people.
    Nature is not insane, it is the people.
    Demagogues are not the focal problem, it is the people.
    People are not rational, nor reasonable. We all are delusional at the best of times. Nothing but walking bags of raging chemicals. Get used to this, accept it, see the insane asylum. Then next time an orange potato chip begins gaining popularity in an election that holds the future of people in its grip,,,, you will not be caught off guard.
    As I advance into my own stoopidity, I hope I am reaching a form of intelligence.

  22. Is it pleasant to be so ill-informed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it pleasant to be so ill-informed? I think it must be, there are so many people like yourself who are willing to just swallow the headlines fed to them in their bubbles rather than put in the effort to verify that what they want to believe is what they should believe.

  23. Notice that this is about the Saudi people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's important to notice that this happened because the Saudi public called for him to be punished.

    When these stories circulate the focus is always about it being the fault of the government or the "religious leaders" but it's important to understand it's also what the *citizens* want. This is the pulse of Islam as a whole. It's not fringe.

    1. Re:Notice that this is about the Saudi people by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Mod this up. Here in the West, most people assume that all people throughout the world wanna be free. But when they do become free, or get a choice, mob rule ensue. In fact, the Saudi royals are probably more advanced than their populace, who are just fed whatever the madrassahs teach. If the Saudi government was overthrown and replaced by a 'democracy' - the way the US did in Iraq and would like to do in Syria - al Qaeda would win the popular vote.

  24. Meddling [Re:SJW] by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may be a matter of not sticking ones nose in another country's business: fix our own backyard first.

    Meddling in the Middle East just seems to make things worse. If they wanna be medieval and keep resisting modernization, there should come a point where we give up trying to modernize them and instead focus on issues closer to home.

    1. Re:Meddling [Re:SJW] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That logic changes when we want to start importing them here. Maybe they should be trained better at home before we bring them here.

    2. Re:Meddling [Re:SJW] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Because we as a nation are ALREADY meddling, we owe assistance to those displaced by conflicts we've meddled in. But, that's not a reason to continue meddling.

  25. Video of his arrest by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Apparently he was streaming when he was arrested (police arrives at 7:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  26. Re:Religion poisons everything by GNious · · Score: 1

    Saudi Arabia and their stupid pointless shitty laws

    Meanwhile, they have a teenage pregnancy rate that's almost 1/3 of the US'

    Just saying, it does seem to have an effect.

  27. fuck him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is just another arab, he probably was trying to set a bomb on her base or something

    fuck islam, fuck medieval people

  28. Re:Religion poisons everything by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    You're right... though I don't limit it to Islam. I hate all religions.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. That's all it takes? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

    If all it takes is that "the general public demanded for him to be punished for his actions" then I demand that Colonel Fawaz Al-Mayman be punished for his actions, along with every member of the police that arrested Abu Sin. Who's with me?

    Think it'll work? *crickets*

  31. Re:Religion poisons everything by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Between the honor killings, forced marriage and FGM happening in Saudi Arabia I can understand why their teen pregnancy rate is so low!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  32. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    [Americans are] quick to point out the injustice of the Saudi criminal code yet conveniently overlook the fact that it is a criminal offence to dance at the Jefferson Memorial, or that until 1967 interracial marriages were illegal in a plurality of states.

    I think most Americans are quick to point out stupid laws in the U.S., too, when they become aware of such laws. But most Americans are just too stupid to vote out the Congresscritters who enact such laws.

  33. Funny thing about "them" by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Can't hold hands, kiss in public, but they can have sex with goats/sheep, car mufflers etc and it's ok. What a backwards society!

  34. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, "all religions" isn't going to lash a dude for talking to a girl, so your rant is non-sequitur.

  35. modded insightful WAS: Re:SJW by bmo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Take your alt-right political trolling and shove it up your ass.

    Goddamn, the alt-right is fucking stupid.

    Yes, that's ad-hominem. It's also not ad-hominem to call out dumbasses such as yourself bent on bringing /pol/ to Slashdot.

    Fuck you.

    --
    BMO -- Who has karma to fucking burn. Eat a bag of dicks.

  36. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not Islam, it's Wahhabism. (Please stay were you are. Royal Al Qaeda assassination team have been dispatched to your location several thousands of km away.) Noooo..Wait, they will kill each other before getting into airport. Phew! Unless the coming US-Saudi lawsuit reveal a measure of collaboration between the rebellious members of the government and Al Qaeda. Noooo..

  37. What an amazing, beautiful culture! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an amazing, beautiful culture.

    Saudis are some of the biggest jerks on the planet.

    Their culture deserves no respect.

  38. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck the cultural differences excuse. I'm not going to respect a way of thinking that perpetuates human rights violations just because it's different; that is fucking idiotic.

  39. Re:Religion poisons everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading that made me throw up in my mouth a little bit.

    Just saying.

  40. Islam poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

    In Islamic jurisprudence - where the rules of a religion are translated into applied laws of a country - there are 4 schools - Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali (talking about Sunni Islam here - there are 2 in Shia - Jaafari and Khomeni'i). Most Muslim countries in Asia follow the Hanafi school - that is countries like Jordan, Iraq, Turkey, the stans (to the extent they're followed at all), Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Kuwait. Egypt and Syria follow a blend of Hanafi and Shafi'i, since al Azhar university in Cairo is where most of Shafi'i doctrine evolved. Other than that, Shafi'i is followed in Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia and Brunei. Maliki evolved in Andaluz - Islamic Spain - and is the school followed in most of North Africa, aside from the East - Egypt, Sudan and Somalia.

    Wahabism is an implementation of the 4th school - Hanbali - and would otherwise be an asterisk, but it's there in 2 countries - Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Since Saudi Arabia is the country that has Mecca and Medina, that makes it unignorable. Otherwise, there are stray sects of Islam all around - like Ibadi in Oman - which nobody notices.

    1. Re:Islam poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Stalin and Hitler were there, but the GP is almost right. As was pointed out above, he did everything he could to avoid saying 'Islam'.

      But if one looks at history, more people have been killed over the centuries in the name of Islam than by either Stalin or Hitler. It started w/ the Arab conquests after Mohammed's death, then at the turn of the first millenium, there were the massacres that accompanied the conquest of the Indian sub-continent. Then in the Middle East, there was always warfare in the ex Byzantine provinces until they were Islamized, as well as the Muslim conquests of North Africa. Oh, and then there was the slave trade, which Europeans and White Americans are always blamed for, but which was started by Arabs taking captive Blacks (who they call 'Abid' or the n-word) and selling them.

  41. It is the economy, stupid by mi · · Score: 1

    Saudi Arabia remains a very rich country. Its subsidized citizens are obscenely rich, but even the non-citizens are doing rather well. It has, for example, a large population of Indians, who, despite having no prospect of citizenship, like their salaries much better there, than in their own reasonably free country.

    For another example, it had a large contingent of Arabs from Palestine until 1991 (when the fools celebrated Saddam Hussein's invasion into Kuwait and were summarily expelled by the Saudis over it). They too preferred Saudi Arabia over the more secular destinations (like most other Arab countries).

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re: It is the economy, stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, and now we should probably cherish the nazis of syria, who kill for fun. also paid by riad.

    2. Re:It is the economy, stupid by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      "Sure they're evil, but they made the trains run on time..."

    3. Re:It is the economy, stupid by mi · · Score: 1

      That argument certainly worked for a vast number of people, yes. And Saudis aren't even that evil...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  42. Re:Religion poisons everything by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Not to mention, girls are allowed to marry in their teens, under Islamic law. After all, Mohammed, when he was in his 50s, married a 6-year old girl Aisha and consummated it when she was 9. And in Islam, Mohammed is 'al insan al kamil', or the perfect model for mankind, and so there is no way they would outlaw pedophilia

  43. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we know your sexual orientation. Great!

  44. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, there's also the fact the laws mentioned have either been thrown out by the courts as unConstitutional, or exist for a good reason.
    Dancing isn't illegal in the US, obviously. Dancing at the Jefferson Memorial isn't banned, either - unless you're disturbing the other tourists. In which case, of course it's prohibited, along with taking a shit in the lobby, or planking the statues.

  45. Sucking up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is too busy kissing their asses to keep that sweet crude coming.

    Ewww. That was a disturbing image.

    Not to mention true.

  46. Re: not our business by slashrio · · Score: 1

    How the 'souvereign state of Saudi Arabia' treats its civilians is not our concern. We have no business intervening with their internal affairs.
    Now, if it were the 'islamic terrorist state of Iran' where this happened, then of course it would have been a totally different story as Saudi Arabia is an ally to the petrodollar whereas Iran is not.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  47. Re: embraced by slashrio · · Score: 1

    As long as S.A. keeps selling its oil in US$ the US will not intervene with anything that happens inside the country, and will protect them militarily against other countries, except Israel.

    --
    "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
  48. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it wasnt until 2015 that gays could be married in the land of the free.

    Of course they could. A gay guy just had to find a gay girl to marry, and it would have been perfectly legal.

  49. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Copid · · Score: 1

    Could I summarize this post as, "All countries' laws are basically equal in terms of injustice/ridiculousness?" I'm guessing not, but that's really the only solid claim i can really extract from it.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  50. Re:this is a cultural issue, not a technology issu by Copid · · Score: 1

    Just like before 1967, a white person just had to find another white person to marry. The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  51. Re:Religion poisons everything by Copid · · Score: 1

    Why do I get the feeling that the teenage pregnancy rate is not a statistic we're likely to get any clarity on in Saudi Arabia? If the "official" rate is 1/3 of the US, it seems like a pretty good bet that it's even higher than that in reality.

    Kind of like how Iran has no gay people.

    --
    An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  52. Saudi Arabia is not our friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saudi Arabia is not like western countries. Ignorance of this fact on both sides caused the unfortunate prison outcome.
    https://sofrep.com/64697/obama-saudi-arabia-complicated/