'Tenting' your fingers during a job interview can get you more money. It's supposed to show 'true confidence and competence'.
Lean forward whenever an interviewer is really boring the fuck out of you. It's supposed to show you are 'engaged and interested'.
Remember there are no 'right answers' to personality assessment tests...unless you want the job. Then you want to score high on conscientiousness, openness to experience and agreeableness, low on neuroticism, right in the middle on extroversion (unless a marketer, than high on extroversion).
Maintain an internal happy chant...'I've got a secret and you won't catch me, la la la lala, I've got a secret...'
Don't think 'venus'. CO2 isn't enough. It's a small fraction of total greenhouse effect.
The question is: 'Will the increase in water vapor cause more greenhouse effect or more increase in albedo?' The answer to that question is 'faith based'.
We know the radiation absorption properties of CO2, and we know it's not a problem by itself. For CO2 to be a problem, there needs to be a positive feedback between CO2 levels and water vapor levels and there needs to be no significant negative feedback from increased cloud cover.
Those two coefficients are simply pulled from dark places and can get you any answer you want from the models.
Not making the point you think you are. CO2 levels started to move in about 1900. You point out that temperatures in the Alps have been going up for 200 years prior.
Slashdot Mirror
One investor is always a bad move, especially if that one investor wants to control your capitol with an eyedropper. Might as well have a boss.
Maybe not 'professionals'. But Lying is a skill that can be improved, like any other.
Lie more.
Learn to lie with body language.
'Tenting' your fingers during a job interview can get you more money. It's supposed to show 'true confidence and competence'.
Lean forward whenever an interviewer is really boring the fuck out of you. It's supposed to show you are 'engaged and interested'.
Remember there are no 'right answers' to personality assessment tests...unless you want the job. Then you want to score high on conscientiousness, openness to experience and agreeableness, low on neuroticism, right in the middle on extroversion (unless a marketer, than high on extroversion).
Maintain an internal happy chant...'I've got a secret and you won't catch me, la la la lala, I've got a secret...'
Don't think 'venus'. CO2 isn't enough. It's a small fraction of total greenhouse effect.
The question is: 'Will the increase in water vapor cause more greenhouse effect or more increase in albedo?' The answer to that question is 'faith based'.
Is English your first language?
CO2 emissions over time aren't a secret. Check your facts.
'Fuel ratio' is the rocketry term. Mass ratio of fuel/oxidizer to everything else, including cargo (for a needed total delta v).
1 over fuel ratio could be defined as 'gear ratio', but it's still a stupid overload of a term.
Yes, what you write is true.
But only tells a fraction of the story.
We know the radiation absorption properties of CO2, and we know it's not a problem by itself. For CO2 to be a problem, there needs to be a positive feedback between CO2 levels and water vapor levels and there needs to be no significant negative feedback from increased cloud cover.
Those two coefficients are simply pulled from dark places and can get you any answer you want from the models.
If you had two working brain cells, you'd have replaced yourself with a really stupid bot by now.
Statistical liar!
% of total is a stupid metric. China went from 3,200 TWh to to 3900 TWh from coal in that period.
Chinese self reported numbers so take the whole thing with a grain of salt.
Put more bluntly. If it's 'settled' it's not science.
Not making the point you think you are. CO2 levels started to move in about 1900. You point out that temperatures in the Alps have been going up for 200 years prior.
CA's newest Senator got her start in politics as quid pro quo for fucking Willie Brown while on his payroll.
Do you have that from a credible source?
I have a friend that ran audio visual for a large CA state agency.
He played to presenter on and off the stage to the tune of 'Sexual Harassment Panda'. She didn't get it, fortunately for him.
Sign in. Say: 'Excuse me, I need to goto the restroom'. Don't come back.
Problem solved.
Your value as a human being is different than your value as an employee.
Your value as an employee IS intrinsically tied to your value as a worker/productivity.
The 'blower' was charged with whoring?
"Golden Parachutes" are _negotiated_ at hire time. Renegotiated when they think they're worth more. Never at fire time.
Depends on the cause. Generally no.
Fiorina got hers, despite being fired for gross incompetence and running the company into the ground.
What? No allegations against _their_side_ are credible to SJWs.
There is no dispute that Clinton got Lewinsky a job at the pentagon she was in no way qualified for.
Those would likely be a wash. The consequences of the initial screw ups might be worse on the government side.
'Fuck me and I'll give you diamond' has the same issue.
Women that sleep their way to the top are co conspirators, not victims.
I knew a veloster was a piece of shit, but as slow as a Metro?