Slashdot Mirror


Tech To Blame For Ever-Growing Car Repair Costs, AAA Says (cnet.com)

A new study from AAA highlights the high repair costs associated with cars that have advanced safety technology. "[S]eemingly small damages to a vehicle's front end can incur costs nearing $3,000," CNET reports. From the report: The study looked at three solid sellers in multiple vehicle segments, including a small SUV, a midsize sedan and a pickup truck. It looked at repair costs using original equipment list prices and an established average for technician labor rates.

Let's use AAA's examples for some relatable horror stories. Mess up your rear bumper? Well, if you have ultrasonic parking sensors or radar back there, it could cost anywhere from $500 to $2,000 to fix. Knock off a side mirror equipped with a camera as part of a surround-view system? $500 to $1,100. Windshields are especially tricky. People who own cars with windshields that have embedded heating elements already have to pony up hundreds of dollars to replace what you might think is just a piece of glass. Factor complex camera systems (like autobrake) into the mix, and not only do folks get hit with the windshield replacement, they possibly have to find a trained professional to recalibrate all that tech behind it.

294 comments

  1. Tech? by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Subaru wants $57 for a replacement fan control knob. This is "tech"?

    1. Re:Tech? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Technically, *everything* about cars is "tech".

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Subaru backwards is: u r a bus

    3. Re:Tech? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Wrong part, moron. And $17 is still a lot to pay for 37 cents worth of plastic.

    4. Re:Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "De-technified" vehicles with 3D-printable components might find their place in the market.

    5. Re:Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot cheaper and more accurate than shaving it out of a block of plastic yourself.

      Any inventory that has to sit somewhere over time accrues cost. Any production run that isn't enormous has a much higher cost per piece. Add those two together and you get higher cost products. It's not rocket science.

      You can always lease new cars for 3 years and not take on any responsibility for repairs.

    6. Re:Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have scrapyards in the U.S.? Or Ebay? I've heard that they have a U.S. website, where people can sell used car parts...

    7. Re:Tech? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's the inefficiency of the supply chain to you that creates a rather high minimum cost to anything.

      Subaru don't pay $57 for the knob, but they buy millions of them and get them delivered to the factory. To get to you it has to be picked out, packaged, sent (probably by international registered post), import fees paid, the dealer/vendor adds their mark-up...

      Best thing is usually just to get a used one from a wreck for stuff like knobs and trim.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re: Tech? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Seems like a place where 3d printing would come in handy.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:Tech? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It's the inefficiency of the supply chain to you that creates a rather high minimum cost to anything.

      Horseshit. It's a very deliberate action on behalf of a company that is able to provide a shitload of parts to most countries of the world with incredible ease.

    10. Re: Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Smart car has a similar design philosophy. Plastic body panels instead of steel, for instance.

    11. Re:Tech? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but if you believe the mechanic I use, Subaru won't have the knob in stock. According to him they rarely have ANYTHING in stock. It will take 3 to 5 days to get it. And, I assume the actual charge will be $57 plus shipping.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    12. Re:Tech? by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      Usually they're all broken when that happens. The knob on my seat switch broke on my '01 SLK. Mercedes would only sell the lower seat assembly for $650! (essentially a plastic cover, the seat switch and the tiny plastic knob I needed) On ebay, I found every seat and seat switch assembly had that knob broken. It was a defective design in the first place.

      I had a bright idea to check parts for it's sister car, the Chrysler Crossfire. I could get a new lower seat assembly for $150 instead of $650 - cheaper than a used Benz one with a broken knob. They'd changed the plug ends hoping to make it impossible to avoid the $650 price, but I can solder so it was no problem to move the plug.

      The radios in 90s lumina's had knobs that shrank, then split on the shafts. It happened to every one I saw. No used repairs with those. In fact, replacements would fail too unless they were made from a higher quality plastic. (aka, I've seen extremely high failure rate knobs due to design in multiple makes)

    13. Re:Tech? by Spamalope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. It's a profit center. 5,000% markup? Bonuses all around!

    14. Re:Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are just split (ie. there aren't pieces missing) you can find some washers that fit snugly around the inner shaft and epoxy them in place.

    15. Re: Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plastic doesn't last long when exposed to the elements. It tends to become very brittle.

  2. Luddites!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How dare you narrow minded troglodytes be sceptical of increasing VALUE. You'll be asking for cheaper houses next!

    1. Re:Luddites!! by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, my daughter plans on studying in China and then hoping to get a job with a western company and a western salary... then she can live in China, work at the world's top tech companies and live in a place where prices are cheap... at least until the Chinese decide to simply crash the world economy to further communism.

      My son is 16 and already looking into micro-houses for when he gets older. We're considering buying a plot of land and populating it with 4-10 micro houses with parking for a single shared self driving car. We're hoping to be able to sell them for $25,000 a piece. We'll use a single centralized heater, have a single parking spot for cars, room for one electric moped per house, etc...

      The idea is that at least until they have children (a LONG WAY OFF I hope) this would allow them to live with very little debt and spend the vast majority of their income on socializing and enjoying live while saving money for their eventual houses to raise children in... which may also be somewhat minimalist.

      If food is readily accessible via delivery services and restaurants, and clothing can be washed by service (which will become increasingly more popular as the job market shrinks) and most forms of entertainment at home is computer rather than large sitting room oriented, what's the point of a big house or apartment?

      I would move into one as well if I were single. I have an office where I spend most of my time (even recreational) and have little need for much space at home. I think 30m^2 would be far more than enough for me. I'm in a room about that big right now and can easily mentally design the room to meet all my needs.

      So, yeh... cheaper housing would make perfect sense.

    2. Re:Luddites!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You already can do this. It's called a trailer park.

    3. Re:Luddites!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in which area are there zoning laws which would make that legal? You will run into NIMBY issues very quickly. Zoning and building codes are crazy.

    4. Re:Luddites!! by rfengr · · Score: 1

      This is why we have zoning laws. “Damned Cletus, you can’t use the car-on-blocks as a dog house for the pit!”.

    5. Re:Luddites!! by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      " then she can live in China..."

      There's the downside. Quite why anyone would want to live in a polluted authoritarian dictatorship beats me. Obviously money is king with her.

    6. Re:Luddites!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My previous apartment was 27m2 and big enough, had all the usual basic stuff except TV.
      A bit cramped, but if necessary I could also get by with 20m2, but then have to think carefully about efficient closet space and getting rid of more stuff.

      Washing machine is just 0,5m2 or something, well worth the space if you look at money/freedom/hassle.
      For example you can wash something quickly at 5 in the morning if you please for no extra money, a service that quick would cost a lot I imagine.
      And if you don't want the hassle of having to bring/pickup your clothes, you pay extra.
      Small student apartments here (Netherlands) sometimes have shared washing machines in the building, that's also an option.

      With 2-4 pan heaters (idk the word, not native English) on top of a small combination fridge+freezer, the cooking part is also mostly taken care of, with just 0,5m2 extra (or even less).

      Of course it always depends on one's needs, I'd personally not get rid of these unless I HAD to live too cramped.

    7. Re:Luddites!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you focus on only the negative, every place is a shithole. There's a lot more to China than you think. You should travel, cultivate yourself and trying living in a few other places. You might be surprised to find out that your country isn't the best in the world.

    8. Re:Luddites!! by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Actually, my daughter plans on studying in China and then hoping to get a job with a western company and a western salary... then she can live in China, work at the world's top tech companies and live in a place where prices are cheap... at least until the Chinese decide to simply crash the world economy to further communism. ...So, yeh... cheaper housing would make perfect sense.

      If she works in any place where Western companies operate, she won't be living cheap - far from it. Most of the places that Western companies operate are on the coast, be it Suzhou, Fujien, Guangzhou, et al. It's only if one moves to places like Inner Mongolia, Ganzu or Xinxiang that things could get cheaper, but I doubt that those places get WiFi, and I also doubt that any Western company operates there.

  3. For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have auto insurance

    I also drive an F250 King Ranch, so my vehicle is typically barely damaged when getting in a collision with most modern POS autos. Running into a smart car is no worse then running into a racoon as far as my bumper is concerned. YMMV

    1. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well thanks for demonstrating you're a moron in multiple respects, none the least of which in expecting a "racoon"-SIC to be at truck bumper height in the first place. YMMP (=Your Mother May Party)

    2. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      some dude in a big beautiful pickup truck rear-ended my PT cruiser. Dented my hatch and I drove home just fine, fixed it some weeks later. His radiator exploded everywhere and he had to be towed.

    3. Re:For these reasons and more by Sir+Lurkalot · · Score: 1

      Well thanks for demonstrating you're a moron in multiple respects, none the least of which in expecting a "racoon"-SIC to be at truck bumper height in the first place. YMMP (=Your Mother May Party)

      Love this post.
      Fuck the Brodozzer

    4. Re:For these reasons and more by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      Wow!!! I just Googled that truck... that is one giant heap of metal.

      What would you use a vehicle like that for? I drive a BMW i3 which is a gigantic family car and when my kids get older, I'm looking forward to hopefully switching to self-driving Uber as my main transport.

      So back to that truck.

      I can imagine that it's good for farming, but it's very high up, so without loading docks, it seems very impractical. I'm also guessing it has a huge engine (didn't check), so you're probably hauling car parts or other heavy materials?

    5. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you're the guy who parks your lifted, extended cab, extended bed, dualie, trailer equipped truck in the "compact car" spot in the parking garage.
      That's not a commuter vehicle jackass, and you can park it on the roof and hike your fat ass to the stairs.

    6. Re:For these reasons and more by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      What would you use a vehicle like that for? I

      Hauling stuff (firewood, etc).

      Dropping a boat in the lake for a day and hauling it out....

      Those are just a couple of quick things that come to mind.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad your steel penis extension makes you happy, at the expense of the safety of everyone around you. Oh, and thanks for driving an amazingly inefficient vehicle intended for those that actually have to haul shit around, but is mostly driven by those that want to exclaim to everyone around how big of a narcissistic fucking douchebag they are. I guess we should be happy you didn't go for the F-350 duallie for no purpose?

    8. Re:For these reasons and more by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Funny

      The news I just heard is that we found the guy with the PT cruiser that hasn't rusted to shit, and actually still runs.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    9. Re:For these reasons and more by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are people that buy Ford F-series trucks for work purposes - a whole lot of them. However, there are plenty of people that buy them for image, and rarely actually use the vehicle for it's intended purpose of hauling things around. Some will use them on the weekend for towing other recreational equipment - camping stuff, boats, etc.

      Also, many people that buy an F-series truck for a business may be better served by an E-series van - it's cheaper, and has roughly the same cargo capacity without the thievery and cargo getting wet if it rains. Any business working in agriculture or other outdoor work is probably served best by the truck, but construction contractors usually go with the van, because they can lock up all their tools and still have room for several 4x8 sheets of wood, wallboard, boxes of tile, etc. without the risk of having all of it ruined should there be weather.

      But vans aren't "cool" so the F-150 is the best selling vehicle in the world by a long way.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My truck isnt quite that big, but I have a dualie that I pull a horse trailer with 2-3 times per month, and boat often in the summer.

    11. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have your choice of pickups.

    12. Re:For these reasons and more by dryeo · · Score: 2

      It's nice not to have to lift each piece of firewood over your head to put it in the truck. Also nice to be able to drop the firewood out of the truck without it bouncing away and having to move it again.
      I'm probably getting old, but I like to minimize the work rather then maximize it and most new trucks are way too high and hard enough to get in, little well put anything else in. Nice to be able to see that boat that you're towing, especially when backing up to the lake.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    13. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think a bmw i3 is a large car by any means. That prooves one of two things. Either you've never been to N. America or S. America and are only from the large city from another continent. Or if you are from the Americas that you've never been out of a city smaller than 5 million people. Nice little toy you have though.

    14. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, could you start paying attention and stop running into people with your truck?

    15. Re: For these reasons and more by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      With a big enough lift kit, it should also be suitable for running over self-driving Ubers.

    16. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is there's a big gap in rated towing space.

      A lot of smaller (Nissan Xterra) to mid sized SUV were tated for 5K towing and 500 lbs tongue weight and we're readily availavle, but then companies started moving them to unibody and adding extras inside which dropped towing to mainly between 2K to 3.5K for a lot of SUVs (and they still are), with 10% for tongue weight.

      Now if you want a camper, it's really hard to find something 3.5K or less with a dry hitch weight of 350 or less, without paying quite a lot more than your standard camper prices as they're "too specialized".

      The sweetspot for campers weight Wise seems tp be that ~400 dry hitch to around 700, with trailer weights of 3500 to 7000, which vehicle wise puts you into bigger SUVs or full size truck ranges (or like an old 2003 Chevy Suburban).

    17. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That truck ("F250 King Ranch") is great for making a tiny penis appear slightly larger, it's also great for drawing attention to someone who is a giant cunt.

    18. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this BS about pick ups and towing and weight is just that: total BS.

      You can tow a shit load with a much smaller vehicle. You can haul a decent load with a much smaller vehicle.

      Here in Australia the sweet-spot is around 1 ton. That's 1000 kg, or 2200 lbs.

      Nearly all utility vehicles with one axle can haul that, and it's fine. It does the job, it fuel efficient, and is actually used by everyone.

    19. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the F-150 is the best selling vehicle in the world by a long way."

      WTF are you smoking fool?

      Toyota Corolla, 40 million, from 1966 to present.

      VW Beetle, 20 million, 1938 - 2003.

      Ford F-Series (all types), 30 million, 1948 to present.

      Source.

      Forbes doesn't even list an F-Series in the top-13 best sellers for 2012.

    20. Re:For these reasons and more by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Yaknow, if you use the bed of your truck once a month...you still need a truck. This is one of the weaknesses of data-driven analytics. "Our data shows most people hardly ever use the bed of their truck - morons!" Yeah, but that one time is when you need it.

      Moreover whoda thunk it - we humans are motivated by status. What morons! Obeying their instincts instead of suppressing them. That's so bad for their mental health!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    21. Re:For these reasons and more by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Moreover whoda thunk it - we humans are motivated by status. What morons! Obeying their instincts instead of suppressing them. That's so bad for their mental health!"

      The amusing thing is that anyone thinks a pick-up truck confers status. If its not being used by a real blue collar worker then just says wannabe trailer trash to me.

    22. Re:For these reasons and more by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Loading ordinary vans is an asspain and vans don't take outsize cargo. If I needed a van I'd get a medium duty box body van with a liftgate to solve both problems. If I needed a pickup for construction I'd install a flatbed with a liftgate for the same reason. I have one on my longbed F150 (with Hellwig overload leaves, coilover shocks and Timbren urethane springs which BTW don't conflict with each other). It's carried a milling machine without squatting much and the liftgate is a great work surface. I use the gate to load my other trucks too.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    23. Re:For these reasons and more by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a car without 4 doors being referred to as gigantic. "Cargo space is not one of the i3’s fortes, as the small hatchback offers 15.1 cubic feet with the seats up and 36.9 cubic feet with the seats down. Front passengers receive 40.5 inches of legroom and rear passengers get a tight 31.9 inches." - MotorTrend

    24. Re:For these reasons and more by dasunt · · Score: 1

      What would you use a vehicle like that for? I drive a BMW i3 which is a gigantic family car and when my kids get older, I'm looking forward to hopefully switching to self-driving Uber as my main transport.

      So back to that truck.

      I can imagine that it's good for farming, but it's very high up, so without loading docks, it seems very impractical. I'm also guessing it has a huge engine (didn't check), so you're probably hauling car parts or other heavy materials?

      I have an old truck that's probably about that big.

      As much as it probably sounds like I'm stating the obvious, it's good for hauling bulky stuff. Brush and leaves, mulch, lumber and related materials, two-wheeled vehicles, etc.

      But I mostly use it to haul stuff to the dump. ;)

      As an average joe working in IT, my personal truck probably runs a few times each year, since it is a slight PITA to drive and I have other vehicles. I go back and forth on the convenience of having a truck available, and if it's just cheaper to rent one when I need it.

      Funny enough, I'm much more likely to haul stuff with the car, since we love canoe camping and the car's much more convenient and comfortable. Two backpacks in the trunk, a canoe on the roof rack strapped down, and we're good to drive four or five hours to great canoe camping sites.

    25. Re:For these reasons and more by dasunt · · Score: 1

      You missed the big one.

      Honda Super Cub (all variants) - over 100 million sold, from 1958 to the present.

    26. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Car sharing. As a member I just rent the type of vehicle E.g. EV car or van for an hour or three for what I need to carry.

      Otherwise the bicycle (with trailer) does a lot and I avoid all of this motor vehicle cost and hassle while laughing to the bank.

    27. Re:For these reasons and more by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Neons of all kinds are still limping around.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re: For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that can be done by a regular sized car hauling a trailer. That's what everyone in the rest of the civilized world does.

    29. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you use the bed of your truck once a month...you still need a truck

      I'd just rent or borrow a truck once a month then.

      we humans are motivated by status

      Speak for yourself. Not everyone is as insecure as you.

    30. Re:For these reasons and more by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Wow, that is really ugly bigoted classism. You're what's wrong with America. How's that go, comfort the afflicted? You're not supposed to afflict the afflicted and comfort the comfortable. Speak truth to the powerful, not the powerless. Wait, you're one of Putin's trolls, aren't you? You're here to start fights and divide us. Well it's not going to work, Ivan.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    31. Re:For these reasons and more by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The King Ranch version is not the version that people who buy a truck to do work purchase. The King Ranch version is basically the 2010's version of the "personal luxury vehicles" of the 60's-70's like the Cadillac Eldorado. Big, garish, over the top, not particularly fuel efficient, and all about image. A person buying a truck like that isn't going to look at vans.

      Also, the problem with the E-Series is that Ford discontinued them (well, they still make the cabs for things like box trucks, but no more vans). You can get a Transit van though, or try to buy used. Problem with used ones is that these vans live hard lives, and people who have them tend to hold onto them until they have pretty much used them up. Though the thing nowadays is to buy a used conversion van for cheap since they tend to live easier lives and have horrible resale value, and then rip out the interior.

    32. Re:For these reasons and more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're what's wrong. Stupid fuck unnecessarily driving around in a big truck because you got a small dick. You don't give a shit about endangering people or polluting, just your fragile ego.

      I'd cave your fucking skull in if we ever met, wimp.

    33. Re:For these reasons and more by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      FWIW the wikipedia article for Pickup Truck cites that "by the 1990s, less than 15% of owners reported use in work as the pickup truck's primary purpose" (Mueller, Mike. The American Pickup Truck. p. 9)

    34. Re:For these reasons and more by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I started reading what you wrote... I think it's the first time in years I ever felt as if I honestly didn't understand something that wasn't gibberish. I believe everything you said would make a lot more sense to someone with a clue about trucks. I'm greatly thankful to you for using good punctuation and capitalization. I think the moment you write liftgate, I was already tempted to Google. By the time you made references to Hellwig and Timbren, I was wondering how Harry Potter's owl would wear canvas boots.

      I really enjoy the rare occasions where someone clearly confuses the shit out of me when I know they're speaking perfectly clear.

      Thanks... I'll smile all day because of this.

    35. Re: For these reasons and more by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I'm actually originally a New Yorker a long long time ago. I now live in Oslo, Norway. My parents live in Florida and I'm in perpetual shock by the enormous vehicles people drive. They're like land boats. I've wanted a Renault Twizzy for a while. If they ever upgrade the design to include real doors, heat and a better battery, I'll go straight to the dealer... it would also help if it weren't French.

      And I can highly recommend against ever owning a BMW i3. It's a truly awful vehicle... but it's dirt cheap and it's only until self-driving taxis happen... so I won't get rid of it.

  4. The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    are over. So get over it.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can force us to bend over but they can't make us like it.

    2. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But why should they be over? Why can't we have the equivalent of an Oldsmobile Cutlass or Ford Model A. Do I need all that other shit they put on the car?

      (disclaimer: I ride a motorcycle. no seat belt, and barely enough brakes to slow down properly)

    3. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by bob4u2c · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know, $15 for the H4 led bulb (and possibly $20 for the glass), and a standard screw driver. Its getting so dang expensive to replace the headlight on my 48 year old car these days!

      The 7 year old family car; I changed the bulb without any tools and I believe a two pack of bulbs for around $20.

      p.s. - The bumpers on my car are real steel, not some fiberglass with foam backing. A few years ago someone backed into one of my bumpers and tore theirs all to shreds, mine just needed a little buffing to get the honda civic stain out.

    4. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by llamalad · · Score: 2

      Oh, what a brave new world, that has uniquely shaped plastic headlights for every model of car on the road, that cost hundreds of dollars each to replace and throw light in shitty to moderately ok patterns until the plastic yellows and hazes up with age.

    5. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 0

      Do they still make cars with anything other than many element LED head lamps?

      I live in Oslo, Norway where most cars are very very new and I don't really pay much attention to cars, so I honestly can't say I've seen anything other than LED for the past 2-3 years.

    6. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here in the US we're still seeing the transition where halogen is phasing out as the base, entry-level trim and being replaced with xenon HID lamps. There are some cases where base level halogen jumps directly to base level LED, but that seems to be the exception rather than the rule.

      I suspect it has been partly a way for manufacturers to drain out supply chains more profitably. Compared to many markets, cars are extremely cheap in the US. So, margins are squeezed very tightly and tiny little bits of cost optimization and "de-contenting" are more important to the manufacturer.

      But, also the US department of transportation has only just gotten around to approving some of the modern LED-based light features like "matrix" lighting to automatically change the beam dispersal rather than requiring manually toggled fixed low/high beam patterns. To date, this has limited the utility of LED lights to mostly being a cosmetic cool factor compared to HID lamps since they had to meet similar beam pattern and intensity limits.

    7. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US at least, you bet they do. The majority of cars out there are rocking good ol' halogen headlights. Luxury cars might use xenon lights. LEDs are used for accent lights and "daytime running lights" but that's about it.

      I remember Ars Technica running an article recently about how Audi's LED headlight technology is illegal in the US due to some old regulations that no one cares to change so that may be part of it.

    8. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, LED headlights last the life of the car, so there is no need to replace them.

    9. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Do they still make cars with anything other than many element LED head lamps?

      Why would they? LED headlamps are superior in every way.

      I own exactly one incandescent bulb. I use it to keep my chicken coop warm in the winter. So I guess there is one drawback of LED blubs: They don't make good space heaters.

    10. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      It's partially the Fed mandates and partly because you just have to have blind spot indicators, variable cruise control, front and back cameras, and all sorts of nannies to "enhance your driving experience." If you still drive a 1948 Fleetline with steel bumpers that can rip small trees out of the ground, great! That may sound cool, but you'll de in a crash.

      And the headlamps? About $2K if the "igniter" fails. LEDs may be cheap, but what lights them up is not.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    11. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      That has probably changed, as the Model 3 is using LED headlamps.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because people are tools. One of the most flawed assumptions in various economic theories ainted to consumers is that, on average, consumers make intelligent purchase decisions.

      Obviously, this isn't the case. If intelligent consumers is an assumption, your model is a lie.

    13. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those highly deforming materials you're laughing at are designed to absorb energy then distribute it slower and more equally to reduce shock in an accident to increase passenger safety and reduce bodily injury.

      While it's true those materials ultimately increase the monetary cost related to vehicle damage in an accident, they reduce risk of fatality or medical costs of injuries to the passenger(s).

      If I have to choose between my car and my life I'll set the thing in fire and roll it over a mountain in a heartbeat. Sure, the cost sucks but I'm alive to pay for it and move on.

    14. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they cost more. Also, I suspect in most LED array configurations of any bulb is out, your vehicle will fail inspection. I wouldn't be surprised if manufacturer's made the individual light components difficult to replace to increase their MTTF (designed obsolescence).

      In my state which requires annual vehicke inspections, they have ignorant policies like, if a feature is on a car, it must function or be repaired. For example, if you have a fog light it has to work even though many vehicles don't have fog lights so it's obviously not a required safety feature. This brings a lot of additional revenue to local mechanics shops that love any reason they can find to throw a hefty service fee on you.

    15. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LED headlights last the life of the car? What are you smoking and where can I get some?

      I keep hearing the statement that "LEDs last 10,000 hours" yet we're still having to replace faulty LEDs in cars and homes on a regular basis. Maybe LEDs do last 10,000 hours but they don't provide light for that long.

    16. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      I still own a couple of incandescent lights: one in the microwave, one in the oven, and one for under the range hood. The microwave doesn't like LED's for some odd reason (they crackle and pop). The one in the oven I'm sure would melt the plastic in the bulb, then catch fire. The one under the range is an odd size and the only LED replacement that might work would be about $40 and doesn't dim.

      Other than that, everything is LED and dimmable; daylight intensity if I can get em.

    17. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10,000 hours per led, is about one replacement every 13-14 months. Assuming you phased them in and left them on all the time and have twenty in your home, that mean you need to replace a couple.per month. At half duty, you are still replacing one a month.

    18. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. They SHOULD last for the life of the car, but if there is only a 0,1% chance of them failing and you have a million cars out on the road, 1000 people will have to buy a replacement. And then it gets expensive.

      I remember a friend needing a replacement HID lamp for his Audi... 160 Euros for the bulb. An H7 halogen can be bought for under 10 Euros and they will typically last 3 years.

    19. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck those assholes.
      A shitty 35w CC LED driver in single quantities is under three bucks from aliexpress. A good one costs no more in the quantities an OEM buys them. They've just decided to make the early adopters pay for all of the R&D.

    20. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably won't need all that shit!

      The great thing about bikes is not having to worry about the future...

    21. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      I'm going on 21 years with one of my cars having halogen lamps. The other is 17 years old. None have burnt out yet.

    22. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I know you're proud of that bumper, but soft, easily destroyed bumpers are part of the modern car's crash safety system. You benefited from his destroyed bumper in the form of a softer impact. Two nice solid steel car frames hitting each other is a recipe for neck and spine damage in the occupants, even with belts and air bags.

      How does the old saying go? "Just hose off the dash and put her back on the lot"? You're a lot more expensive to fix than a soft bumper.

    23. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goddamn cagers need to shut their fucking mouths and learn to drive.

    24. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I would like to see is the main structure of the car built to deform and absorb energy to save my family's life in a serious accident, but at the same time have a portion of it be robust enough to survive a simple 5kph bump. You know, like a BUMPER should.

      The plasticky painted front and rear ends of vehicles are currently designed and built to be aesthetically pleasing.

    25. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Same thing here. The only hiccup at the moment is that I moved into a new house which has a bunch of old-school dimmer switches in it. Those cause LEDs to flicker, even when the dimmer switch is turned up to max. I need to rip those out, then all will be well again.

      The house I moved into was bathed in blue-white CFLs, (which also flickered, which was particularly awful) and that was an instant nope. Lots of warm LEDs later, and it's far more livable.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    26. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Devil is in the details.

      LEDs are usually hooked up in series as they most commonly fail to shorted. That lasts until one fails to open.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    27. Re: The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the theoretical lifetimes apply to the light emitting junction itself. Every single premature LED failure I've investigated has been caused by failure of the packaging or wiring.

    28. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather just run your little, insignificant ass down. You irresponsible shitheads riding around on your dinky bikes are like annoying gnats on the road. You get in my way and you get squished.

    29. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A $15 LED bulb is not going to be very good. Those tend to overheat, cause radio interference and flicker, even with a decoder and ferrite beads.

    30. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, all bumpers are real steel. That fibreglass with foam backing is the bumper cover. The bumper is under that.

    31. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has nothing to do with them being LED headlights. It's because Audi's headlights automatically adjusted their brightness. In the US, it is illegal to have headlights that cannot be manually switched from high to low.

    32. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't. The LEDs themselves might last, but all of the circuitry that gets extremely hot to the point it needs active cooling (LED headlights have fans), means that some other part of the bulb will eventually fail.

    33. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single light in my house is 5000K LED. Even the one in the refrigerator.

      Those old, nasty yellow incandescents not only used a lot more power but they also make you feel depressed.

    34. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you are talking about. LED headlights do not use igniters.

    35. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you make me, "tough guy".

    36. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My next door neighbor runs his own bodyshop. Maybe 5 years ago a ~5 year old Beamer came in after its owner rear-ended a pick-up truck (so, assume a 2008 or so--definitely before the manufacturers went completely ape-shit with useless gadgets). There was very little body damage, except for the grill and two busted headlights. Turns out the headlights were over $1500 each. His insurance company wanted to write the car off.

    37. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really get off on murder that much? Are you one of those guys that has to choke your girlfriend half conscious to get your jollies?

      You're what I'd call a sick freak. And if you ever wonder why a biker flips you off or smashed your side mirrors, it has way more to do with your bad driving and attitude than with us bikers.

      If you want to have a better time on the road, learn to control yourself before you make plans to control others.

    38. Re:The days of the $5.00 headlamp replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really get off on murder that much? Are you one of those guys that has to choke your girlfriend half conscious to get your jollies?

      Nice strawman. You build that yourself?

      You're what I'd call a sick freak. And if you ever wonder why a biker flips you off or smashed your side mirrors, it has way more to do with your bad driving and attitude than with us bikers.

      You touch my car, I end your worthless little life, insect.

  5. It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I choose a simple manual trans commuter.
    Not so different then what I bought 20 years ago.

    Currently that's a Chevy Cruze.
    I fix it myself, bought it in cash w 50k on the od for $6k.

    The other side of consumer culture is quite affordable.

    1. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, you like a man tranny?

    2. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m still driving the Jeep I bought 15 years ago/ 200k miles ago. Over the life I have driven this my biggest cost has been tires.

    3. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her name is Chevy Cruze.

    4. Re: It's a choice by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Her name is Chevy Cruze.

      I like the Hispanic ones too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here but 06 LJ, 120k miles and Iâ(TM)ve got the fucked up ECM problem so thatâ(TM)ll cost whenever new ECMs are available, but yeah, biggest cost tires and when I put line-x on the entire tub

      Gonna drive this fucker forever, especially now that we live in south Florida, it fucking owns

    6. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does she wear a cowboy hat and run one of those mega dealerships?

    7. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will always buy cars with standard materials. That way if the repairman tries to mark the parts up higher than 50% or gets particular about how his customers ought to behave I just hit the road

    8. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    9. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Itâ(TM)s not choice when govrt mandates things like cameras on new models

    10. Re:It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still drive a 2000 Honda Civic. It doesn't even have power windows and that's the way I like it. I've done body repair work on it myself and it's both inexpensive and easy. All of that crap they are adding to cars is worthless and serves only to prop up bad drivers.

      In my 25 years of driving, I have never been involved an auto accident. Not even a fender bender. That's because I pay attention to the road when driving. I didn't need or want all of that distracting bumper sensor, 360 video and driving assistance crap.

    11. Re: It's a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the Hispanic ones too.

      That would be a Manuel tranny then.

  6. Car Repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember reading the electronics section of a car repair textbook a few years ago. It bragged about how as much as 80% of the problems with cars were not from the electronics...

    Which means the electronics actually really unreliable.

    Also, car manufacturers have structural monopolies. You own it, you want the replacement part you have to go to them unless you're luck enough that a generic will work, and of course they don't design bumpers to be cheap to repair. It's not a mistake that you need to replace your bumper if you bump a one-ton vehicle into a pencil.

    1. Re:Car Repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was rear-ended last year. The cost was on the guy who hit me, but I was surprised that the cost of replacing 3 ultrasonic parking sensors came to more than the replacement bumber, shock absorbers and panel work to straighten the metalwork behind the bumper combined. If I was paying for the repairs myself, $25 a piece from aliexpress or $80 for a full set of 5 would have saved around $500 off the stealership prices, but when insurance is covering it, gotta get those genuine parts that probably come from the same supplier in China.

  7. Of Printers and Cars by ebonum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would be interested in knowing the breakdown of an automaker's sources of profit.
    Are we now to a point where they sell a $25k car at a loss. However, they know the odds of a fender-bender are high, and it will cost the automaker $800 for the $8,000 repair.

    Is the model moving to something closer to inkjet printers, banks and airlines? Get you in the door cheap, then nail you on the parts or fees.

    The interactions I've had with people from parts suppliers indicate the mark-ups the automakers put on parts are insane.

    1. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being in the business, it's spare part sales. Dealers also make their money on part sales and service.

      My company's global profits are heavily tied to the part sales we do in N. America.

    2. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Ogive17 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Warehousing and logistics costs to provide those extra parts for up to 2 decades after your vehicle is made isn't cheap. The markups may appear high but the profit per piece really isn't that much. I know we sell some stuff at a loss to remain competitive with aftermarket.

      Then there are the routine maintenance items like oil filters, etc. Volumes for those are so high that it's much easier to keep the costs very low as purchasing power is high plus $.05 profit on an oil filter adds up when you sell millions each month.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    3. Re:Of Printers and Cars by caseih · · Score: 1

      For farm machinery, parts are typically marked up 100%. Your average sensor, some of which are are just POTs, can be a couple hundred dollars a piece. Inductive sensors, about $400. A little bit of electronics knowledge can save a fair amount of money by making off-the-shelf parts from various automation retailers do the same job.

      For cars, though, it's more complicated. The other day I learned that to change the headlight bulb on my sisters vehicle it requires removing part of the cowling inside the wheel well. And if you need access to the other lights, it requires removing the bumper!

    4. Re:Of Printers and Cars by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Your average sensor, some of which are are just POTs, can be a couple hundred dollars a piece. Inductive sensors, about $400. A little bit of electronics knowledge can save a fair amount of money by making off-the-shelf parts from various automation retailers do the same job

      I had to fix the electric door lock on the passengers side of one of my cars a couple years ago. Of course the power locks, power windows and power mirrors all connected to the same door module. It was $500 for a new door module. It was a relay on the module that had gone bad. Since there were three of them on there I ordered 6 new relays from an electronics company for $20 for all 6 and removed the old relays and soldered in the new ones. I have three more in case the drivers side ones go bad. But saved $480 dollars and spent about an hour of my time.

      For cars, though, it's more complicated. The other day I learned that to change the headlight bulb on my sisters vehicle it requires removing part of the cowling inside the wheel well. And if you need access to the other lights, it requires removing the bumper!

      Wow, that's a piss poor design. What kind of car was it? I want to be sure to never think about buying one.

    5. Re:Of Printers and Cars by caseih · · Score: 1

      Apparently removing the cowling to access the low beam bulbs is pretty common on crossover SUVs these days, regardless of make. Small hands to reach into these tight spots is always a bonus. This car was a Chevrolet Traverse SUV (same as the GMC Acadia. I'm not completely sure about the bumper removal for the other bulbs besides low beam, but that's what I gathered from the youtube videos on the subject. Was not terribly impressed.

      My old GMC Envoy's headlight housings can remove with just a couple of clips to get access to the bulbs. Now if I could just keep it from burning out the plug going into the bulbs! Bad ground I suspect.

    6. Re:Of Printers and Cars by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you're taking a loss to compete with the aftermarket, you're just inefficient since they are surely not taking a loss.

    7. Re:Of Printers and Cars by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Seems like an application for 3D printers. If they could just keep the CAD file around for 20 years and print spare parts in metal when needed it should reduce costs a lot.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be interested in knowing the breakdown of an automaker's sources of profit.

      44% service department:
      30% new car sales:
      26% used car sales:
      https://www.edmunds.com/car-buying/where-does-the-car-dealer-make-money.html

      New car sales are difficult these days on compact cars. Ford has said (source not readily handy) they make something like $500 profit per car these days and hence why they are getting out of that business. Ford is moving mostly to trucks/SUVs which is $5k-$15k profit per sale.

      Used car sales is where you see all the negotiation and mystery fees tacked onto the bill of sale. Those fees are pure profit for the dealership. Alternative is a business like CarMax which doesn't negotiate but typically has higher prices per vehicle. Their salespeople work off volume of cars sold though, not price per vehicle, so their incentives are slightly different.

      The Service department is regulated to charge X hours for a given job by the book no matter how long it takes. A good department with skilled mechanics will make this work in their favor by finishing early and then taking on additional work. P.S. The service manager is the one you want to get to know at a dealership, they'll be around the longest, they'll also be the one to help out repeat business in a heartbeat.

      Source: Mostly empirical - put something like 50-60k per year of miles on vehicles - I'm in the shop quite a bit and learned about the business indirectly as a result.

    9. Re:Of Printers and Cars by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit on logistics costs when talking about companies which have such an incredibly optimised supply and logistics chain.

      Same with warehousing. They don't keep a building full of old parts, and the same markup exists on something current as well.

    10. Re: Of Printers and Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although insightful, those numbers and that link are what the dealership makes, not the manufacturer. The manufacture likely marks up their actual costs 1000% or more. The dealerships have to find other ways to sucker people since "employee" and "inventory" pricing can be found anywhere at almost any time.

    11. Re:Of Printers and Cars by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Is the model moving to something closer to inkjet printers, banks and airlines? Get you in the door cheap, then nail you on the parts or fees.

      I get you with airlines and printers... but if the same is true for banks, your country needs better banking regulations. I've lived in the UK and Australia, nailing you with fees gets a bank nailed to the wall by the regulator. The ease of switching banks means its a highly competitive market that cant be completely dominated by ancient, existing players. Moving debt is only slightly more difficult. So-called "challenger banks" starting in the UK are making the big boys like Lloyds and Natwest take note. As long as I make repayments on time and keep my account in the black, they don't charge me a penny.

      Of course we don't get "cashback", but you didn't honestly think that the bank was giving you free money did you?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:Of Printers and Cars by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Warehousing and logistics costs to provide those extra parts for up to 2 decades after your vehicle is made isn't cheap. The markups may appear high but the profit per piece really isn't that much. I know we sell some stuff at a loss to remain competitive with aftermarket.

      Then there are the routine maintenance items like oil filters, etc. Volumes for those are so high that it's much easier to keep the costs very low as purchasing power is high plus $.05 profit on an oil filter adds up when you sell millions each month.

      Whilst this is true, a lot of manufacturers are just taking the piss on OEM parts. Honda has to be one of the worst for it. Genuine OEM Honda spark plugs were 4 times the price of NGK's... and I can almost guarantee that the genuine Honda parts were another brand.

      Fortunately aftermarket parts for Hondas are cheap and easy to get. So when my Integra required new spark plugs, I just bought some NGK's.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Of Printers and Cars by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      I suppose the problem *is* the incredibly optimized supply chain. They know exactly how the parts will go from the raw materials to the final location in the vehicle. Spare parts don't follow the same route.

      I remember a story about a high tech warehouse, maybe from Amazon or a similar large company. Employees simply can't pick the stuff they want from the shelf, pay, and get away with it. They have to get it shipped though a transporter, even if they are the ones preparing the order. This is a system that is very efficient for one thing, and very inefficient for special cases.

    14. Re: Of Printers and Cars by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Anybody taking a car to a stealership for anything other than warranty work has already self identified as a sucker.

      The Dealership knows knows they are chumps when they pull the car up and financially sodomize them. Suckers are the fat of the land!

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    15. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      They also (in most cases) offer parts using cheaper materials and have lower tolerances on their production. While it make work as a replacement, it's not likely to fit quite as well or last as long.

      Not saying everything is this way but quite a few things are. Aftermarket bumpers, for example, are crap. Now if you have a 10 year old car, you may not care if the fit is perfect on that replacement. If you have a 1 or 2 year old car, you probably want a part from the original mold.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    16. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Everyone is researching that avenue. Right now it's not very plausible for making parts. It's better for making temporary molds that then are used to make the parts.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    17. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      High volume parts and parts that are currently produced for vehicles that are being made right now, you are correct. That part is easy and very efficient.

      What you are wrong about is being able to support spare parts for that 2010 model year vehicle or something that has very low sales volume.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    18. Re:Of Printers and Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > However, they know the odds of a fender-bender are high, and it will cost the automaker $800 for the $8,000 repair.

      Automaker representatives (aka "dealers") are very seldom involved in any fender-bender repair[*], so I don't know how you can even think an automaker would try to sell a car at a loss with the hope to make it up in replacement parts.

      [*] If you actually go to your dealer for a fender-bender repair, most will just contract it out to a local bodyshop. When's the last time you saw a paint booth at your dealer?

  8. Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Ecuador · · Score: 2

    Yeah, everything's the techs' fault...
    No, it is just one of the excuses, in fact any part, regardless of the "tech" it has will be sold to you for a ridiculous markup, especially if it is an original part. Take my Ford Focus for example, it has a known flaw in that the dashboard compartment lid plastic lock breaks easily. Then, for that plastic lid they charge you £90. That's probably a 10,000% markup. I wish someone would do a sort of "reverse-ifixit", i.e. calculate how much it would cost you to build a car if you bought all the parts separately. Bigger parts have a lower markup than that little piece, so the Focus won't end up costing £2 million as the lid might indicate, but still I expect parts sell several times their cost on average. A great consumer friendly law would be to limit the manufacturer part prices so that the cost of all the parts together are not more than say 2 times the cost of the car. Anyway, some wishful thinking there...

    P.S. If you are curious, the grey market lids are still at around £30, because they just have to compete with a £90k part, so that opened a market for a little piece of plastic which you glue to replace the piece of the lock that breaks for everyone, and they charge you £15 for that!!! I.e. I have to go to a scrap yard to find something in my case...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by bob4u2c · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take the part out, find the part number stamped on it and run it through google. Very good chance you will find the part on e-bay for about 1/10 the cost the dealer will sell it to you. (I looked for just "ford focus dashboard lock clip" and found some for less than $10, with a part number I could be sure).

      I did this with some broken door handles for a Ford Fusion. I was able to get OEM replacements for $16 (both sides) + about $5 shipping. Took about 5 minutes per side to switch them out. Dealer wanted almost $200 + $80/hr labor. New parts are still working after several years.

    2. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I can't get it from ebay.com. I posted prices in £ because I am in the UK, so I (sadly) have a British version where dashboard parts are mirror-image. So, ebay.co.uk has the "repair kit" for £15, and 3rd party lid for £30. Which is why I'll have to go to a scrap yard to get something under £10.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    3. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in England and you drive a Ford = You are the one being stupid, not Ebay, not the manufacturers, YOU. Do not pass buck, do not collect 200$

    4. Re: Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You canâ(TM)t be sure what youâ(TM)re going to get just googling things so you gotta be a lot more specific with part numbers, model years, etc. not to say that there isnâ(TM)t merit to Your method in some ways

    5. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fords are extremely common in the UK https://www.admiral.com/magazine/guides/motor/britains-top-10-most-popular-used-cars

      Ford Fiesta's are the UKs number 1 most popular car, with the Ford Focus coming in at number 3.

      Summary - you don't know what you are talking about, you are the one that is being stupid.

    6. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true that markup is exploitive. Toyota now adds on the 40% fee that mechanics charge, pretending it's the actual cost of the part. At least some companies charge crazy expensive prices for parts. And the chains, like Auto Zone have caught on. When my Toyota pickup needed a muffler and tailpipe, Auto Zone was charging almost twice what a local auto parts store charged, for the exact same aftermarket product and brand.

      But tech is also a very big factor. In my last Toyota pickup, nearly everything that went didn't exist in the previous pickup. Two exhaust line sensors, a fuel fume sensor that I had to cut the bed to get at, and turn sensor cameras that record notches on the brake disk. That last was going to be $350 just for the parts. I decided it was getting cheaper to buy a new one. This
      time I got a Nissan. Cheaper, longer bed, and I didn't have to get all that expensive, superfluous tech. No electric ignition. No power windows. No computer screen in the dashboard. Nice.

    7. Re: Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah customers who want superfluous tech usually are not such good customers. People pay for what they want without too much bellyaching and complaining

    8. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Fords are among the cheapest cars to maintain in the UK, which is part of the reason they are the most popular cars in the UK.
      What do you propose instead... a Rover? :D

    9. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Oh, actually I looked at the lock clip you searched for. That's not what breaks. The lid has a flimsy little plastic thingy that goes into this clip and that is what breaks. I can find that bottom clip part cheap, the lid it secures is the problem (which is UK specific as well).

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    10. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by tquasar · · Score: 1

      A plastic part smaller than a playing card for my camping trailer was priced at $20 US. I offered 10 and bought it. I was rebuilding the engine of my Ford/Mazda Courier and the parts man, a friend, sold me parts at 40% off list price and there were 50 and 60% off prices. The mark-up is 400% and more. My employer bought counterfeit Motorcraft parts and rebuilt clutch plates that were riveted wrong, didn't work.

    11. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did that to add air conditioning to my car. $5k. Or you can just click the option for $2k when you buy the car. Which is still more than aftermarket system cost (which is around $700).

    12. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      Ok, looking at the setup it's the hook that breaks which would require replacing the whole lid. Something I'm sure the dealership will sell you for £150 or more (and will break again).

      Another alternative, take the lid out (broken piece and all) then find a local college that has an engineering department. Talk to a professor and offer to pay a student £10 to 3D print (or metal cast) a new part and figure out a way to mount it to the lid with minimal modifications. Maybe a small metal plate with a screw through it that the hook would thread into (sandwich the metal plate between the top of the lid and the bottom of the lid with the screw sicking out). If it is as common a problem as you say, then there would be a market for the student or department to produce more and make some extra cash.

      I have a 48 year old car, sometimes when you can't find a part (because all those parts disintegrated 30 years ago) you have to improvise. Last improvised part was a 1/2 inch pvc coupler, a hacksaw, and about 20 minutes with a dremel to make a plastic spacer the exact size/shape that isolated the steering column from the steering wheel. Part cost me about 50cents in materials and now my horn doesn't go off every time I turn a corner. Yes, I searched e-bay, someone is now making a 3D part available.

    13. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I've done that for many years (I'm a mechanic) and saved gobs of money. It's also a great way to buy used parts. I get better deals via Ebay for used parts sent to my door than I can get for salvage yard pulls with me doing the removal!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:Yeah, it's tech's fault. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      IIRC Ford sold Rover to a chinese company. Joke would have been funnier a few years ago.

      Again IIRC Jaguars are still Fords.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. The king of expensive repairs by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:The king of expensive repairs by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Wow. So apparently now cars are going to be like smartphones or other electronic gadgets -- everything is too-cleverly designed such that you can't repair individual components (here a small dent in the quarter panel), so you have to remove and replace the whole piece (here thus having to disassemble much of that side of the car in the process). I suppose that's not a terribly surprising result for a car designed from the ground up by Silicon Valley.

    2. Re:The king of expensive repairs by steveha · · Score: 1

      So apparently now cars are going to be like smartphones or other electronic gadgets -- everything is too-cleverly designed such that you can't repair individual components

      There's something to what you say. But on the other hand, Tesla designed the Model 3 to have a greatly reduced parts count and simplified design.

      Sandy Munro and his team famously tore down and analyzed a Tesla Model 3, and he was quite impressed by the design. Initially he made some negative comments but lately he said he "had to eat crow" and that the car is a "symphony of engineering". His only real complaint is that the car body is too complex and heavy; Elon Musk replied on Twitter saying the car body definitely could be simpler but the weight was due to the car being designed to be so safe.

      https://cleantechnica.com/2018/10/23/second-tesla-model-3-teardown-highlights-strengths-opportunities-for-tesla/

      Tesla cars have computer-controlled everything. I can't find the link where I read this, but I read that they use a star-topology wiring data network for control, plus a power bus. For the Model Y, they are rumored to be going to a single cable per gadget, implying power and data together in a star topology. A conventional car has around 5000 feet of wiring (1500 metres) but this story claims that Model Y will need only 328 feet of wire. 328 feet converts almost exactly to 100 metres so I wonder if someone gave a ballpark estimate of 100 metres (nice round number) and some reporter uncritically converted that to an exact number of feet.

      https://www.autoevolution.com/news/elon-musk-tesla-model-y-will-require-only-328-feet-of-wiring-119717.html

      Tesla's modular design is really impressive in the battery and drive train. A Model 3 "drive unit" is a motor plus gearbox plus axles and suspension. To remove it is incredibly simple: four bolts, two cables (data and power), two glycol coolant hoses, and two brake hoses. A motor swap for a Model 3 will take much less labor than most engine or transmission repairs on a conventional car.

      https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-drivetrain-design-elon-musk-master-plan/

      And Tesla is trying to provide a good repair experience. They have a program where they set up Tesla body shops and keep those stocked with parts. For people lucky enough to be near one of these Tesla body shops, a Tesla repair can be amazingly fast.

      https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-in-house-body-repair-shop-model-3-damage-25-hours/

      Early adopters have it worst, and it can cost something like $900 to repair a door handle on a Model S. But Tesla is doing an amazing job of ramping their operations and making their cars as simple as possible to build and to repair.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:The king of expensive repairs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the estimator didn't want to do the work, either because he's not convinced his body and paint guys can get it done, or because they don't want the hassle from the insurance company. I've talked to body shop owners in the past that didn't want to deal with fixing a car, so they're looking to write the repair order as high as they can in order to get the insurance company to total out the car, or get the owner to take it somewhere else. Body shops live and die by come-backs - you fix it right the first time and the customer is happy, you then only have to fight with the insurance company to pay the actual costs of repairs instead of their cherry-picked or outright horseshit lowball costs and demands to use garbage ill-fitting aftermarket panels rather than OEM right-the-first-time panels.

      If the shop has expertise with working on aluminum body panels from other manufacturers that have been using aluminum for a while (Ford F-150, Jaguar, BMW, Audi) then that really shouldn't have been a stupendous repair as long as they can find out what series of aluminum is being used. And the comments about the paint are horseshit - if they are a shop that is worth a damn at all, blending paint is what their paint guy does all day long and it's only a single fender - it's not like they're taking up the whole paint booth for hours at a time for it.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:The king of expensive repairs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      Many cars can be repaired just fine, it just requires a slightly different skill and tool set than a 1970s Chevy Nova.

      I have a Land Rover that was giving me air suspension issues, which causes most people to groan and take to the dealer to get billed a couple thousand dollars for diagnostic time and repair. I spent $400 on a used diagnostic tool I was going to buy anyway, used it to trace the issue to a ride height sensor that was giving invalid values to the body computer, purchased a new sensor online for $20 and installed it in 5 minutes, and then re-calibrated the body computer for the ride height and all is well. And the diagnostic tool was also able to upload newer firmware to the various ECUs on the vehicle to add some electronic features available on newer model years.

      Is diagnosing issues with modern engines and vehicles as simple as older cars? No, but it's also not impossible. And, if you have access to the electronic tools made for modern vehicles, the diagnostic time can be much less because the vehicle will help you to narrow down the issue to only a few possibilities quite quickly.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, just Teslas and select luxury cars are like this. Tesla because you literally CAN'T service it yourself because Tesla makes that as impossible as they can get away with and luxury cars because they know their customers don't care.

    6. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And Tesla is trying to provide a good repair experience

      Oooo, they are now? Maybe I will change my tune on them! Can I buy the diagnostic computer they use and a full set of service manuals, along with any parts I'd like straight from the dealer for me to use at home like I can with Ford, Toyota, BMW, Volvo and just about any other brand?

      Oh, no, seems like they are trying to provide a LOCK-IN repair experience. You had me going there for a moment... I like fixing my own cars.

    7. Re:The king of expensive repairs by steveha · · Score: 2

      Oooo, they are now?
      [...]
      Oh, no, seems like they are trying to provide a LOCK-IN repair experience.

      Wow, such drama.

      You're right of course that if you want to fix your own car, Tesla is the wrong brand to buy.

      Tesla promised they were "working on" opening up repairs. They said this 22 months ago and there has been no news about it since then as far as I know.

      https://electrek.co/2017/01/30/tesla-opening-up-service-replacement-parts/

      The good news is that Teslas are quite easy to repair, assuming you can get the parts.

      https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/national-international/Tesla-Owner-Frustrated-Fixes-Model-S-491889781.html

      Elon Musk has said that they will open up repairs eventually but hasn't promised a specific time. He has also said that Tesla will only try to break-even on repairs, never treat them as a profit center. Musk is a believer in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming and wants to get everyone switched over to electric cars, so I don't think he's lying about the repairs, but I must admit that there's no end in sight to Tesla being uncooperative about owner and third-party repairs.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    8. Re:The king of expensive repairs by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I am impressed that you know more about repair costs than the insurance company's own adjuster (and without even seeing the car!). Please let me know how to contact you so that the next time I need to have one of my cars repaired, I can have you assess the real repair costs.

      Note, the Model 3 doesn't use much aluminum, it's mostly steel, unlike the S and X.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    9. Re:The king of expensive repairs by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      I am impressed that you didn't read what I wrote, or at least didn't even try to comprehend. If it's not aluminum, then there's no way that repair should have cost $7000+ because any body man that knows what the fuck he's doing should be able to repair that using known conventional techniques that have been around for decades.

      Insurance companies are famous for requiring repair centers to jump through hoops like demanding aftermarket panels to be fitted first before they will pay for OEM in any jurisdiction that allows them to do it. My wife's insurance company wasted everyone's time with requiring the repair center to try two different aftermarket fenders on her Honda before agreeing to pay for an OEM panel, and ended up paying more in labor to attach that fender three times than it would have cost to use OEM parts to begin with. And this isn't an isolated incident - it happens countless times to the point where there are states that have passed laws allowing you to opt-out of aftermarket parts at the time of estimation, and the insurance company has to abide by that. These laws would only exist if insurance companies were trying to use sub-standard parts in the repairs in order to cheap out, which is not returning the vehicle to pre-loss condition.

      And do you think the insurance company will eat the labor on these horseshit requirements, or pass them on to the ratepayer?

      Use your god damn head.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    10. Re:The king of expensive repairs by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      I'm sure to fix it shitty would be cheaper, but its a brand new car. Personally, if i cant bang it out with a hammer, or suck it out with a suction cup, then it stays dented.

      In this case, they were fixing it perfect, mint, on a brand new one day sold car. You gotta pay for quality in that situation. Sure my cousin can do it cheaper for cash under the table but i guarantee you get what you pay for with body work. Its pure time and care.

      --
      -
    11. Re: The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla doesn't make it impossible to self service. Nothing prevents you from buying a few Teslas and disassembling them and them parting them out. Tesla jist prefers to sell entire cars to katta at this point in time.

      If you really think there is a huge, untapped demand for selling Tesla parts, you would buy l, disassemble and part them out yourself. You haven't done so. Which means yiu are really saying "wah wah wah I got hosed trying to sell Tesla short!". Just kidding, we know you didn't have the cash to sell it short in the first place, because you don't have an account.

    12. Re:The king of expensive repairs by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I am impressed that you think that, on the one hand, insurance companies try to reduce repair costs as much as possible ("Insurance companies are famous for requiring repair centers to jump through hoops like demanding aftermarket panels to be fitted first before they will pay for OEM"), while on the other hand thinking that insurance companies will accept unreasonably high repair costs.

      Is that doublethink hard or easy for you?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    13. Re:The king of expensive repairs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Note how a lot of the cost is due to the fancy paint which prevented them from doing a repair. Rather than tech, it's expensive paint jobs and aftermarket wraps that are adding a lot to these kinds of repairs.

      That was relatively cheap for a Tesla, since he damaged the car himself and wasn't claiming from someone else's insurance. If it had been someone else's fault there would have been rental fees and loss of value on top.

      Tangentially this accident demonstrates why the current Tesla autopilot hardware in inadequate for the self-driving feature they have been selling. It didn't notice the post the guy hit, didn't warn at all. 360 birds eye view cameras might have helped, or better side facing ultrasonics.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:The king of expensive repairs by sinij · · Score: 1

      This is a scam job by a collision center. Putting new fender over such minor dent is outright fraud.
       
      The cheap way to fix this is to massage back metal (i.e. paintless dent removal) then polish it. There will be minor scratches visible, but it will be only couple hundred to fix.

    15. Re:The king of expensive repairs by mjwx · · Score: 1

      $7000 for a small dent on the fender.

      To be 100% fair, the more tech you pack into a car the more expensive it does get for basic repairs.

      A lovely old lady scrapped the front off side corner of my 2 series the other week. The initial quote for repairs wast over £1,500 until I read it and told them there were no forward parking sensors (honestly, if you need forward parking sensors, driving is not for you). The smart bumper then became a stock standard dumb bumper and the quote dropped to £350 because the repair shop didn't need to employ an auto electrician to remove, re-install and re-calibrate the non-existent sensors. It was only this £350 because of the smaller internal fins of the bumper on the M240i which they needed to be heated and fixed.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    16. Re:The king of expensive repairs by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with a thing you just said, but I take it you didn't read the article GP linked to or read my comment particularly closely since both were focused on mechanical assembly/repair, not electronic issues.

    17. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Kia K900 has you beat. 34 grand. https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2018/09/for-what-its-worth-a-kia-k900-front-corner-collision-will-cost-you-dearly/

    18. Re:The king of expensive repairs by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      That's all very interesting but doesn't appear to speak to the sort of issue raised in GP's article, where the repair shop (1) had to replace an entire body panel rather than just fixing the dent as would be the case with just about any other automobile, and (2) to replace that panel, had to disassemble a substantial portion of that side of the car. The estimate had over 25 hours for body labor -- over 3 days -- and another 16 hours -- 2 days -- to paint it. That's utterly ridiculous for a minor dent in a mass-production car.

      My broader point is that it's eminently possible to be too clever in design, to the detriment of repairability. Folks around here get that just fine when it comes to replacing the battery in an iPhone. And there isn't a miniaturization race for cars, so regardless of whether you think that's a good excuse for making that sort of tradeoff, it certainly doesn't apply here.

    19. Re:The king of expensive repairs by couchslug · · Score: 1

      While I do not work on Teslas because I refuse to own vehicles which I as an experienced auto mechanic (and jet mech and avionics tech) cannot easily repair and maintain, I suspect the design did not take ease of repair into account.
      Teslas are wonderful machines and advanced the state of EV art. I don't need to own one to benefit from progress.
      When I buy an EV it will be common, easy to work on, have a large user base providing plenty of salvage parts (key to keeping long term ownership costs down) and an established model with decent aftermarket support. In five years the EV landscape will be much different.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re:The king of expensive repairs by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      The insurance company did their own estimate to argue against that price, and came up only about $250 lower. The parts themselves were listed at $250. The labor was all the rest. And that's in large part due to a fancy-ass paint job, which requires three layers of paint that have to be blended over the front quarter of the vehicle to look good. The car living in the paint shop for a day or two was a good chunk of that bill.

      In looking to see how ridiculous this was, I came away realizing that it seemed semi-reasonable. Especially after seeing a couple posts from people with non-luxury cars (Honda, Mazda) who did similar damage to their fenders/wheel wells, and got $5k-6k bills for the repairs. It turns out that that's one of the really expensive parts of your car body to damage. I learned something new today.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    21. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a fender, not a quarter panel. Quarter panels are on the rear and are harder to replace.

    22. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he damaged the car himself or the autopilot did?

    23. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting new fender over such minor dent is outright fraud.

      They didn't put anything "over" the dent, they just replaced the fender.

      The cheap way to fix this is to massage back metal (i.e. paintless dent removal) then polish it.

      Fender rolling always looks like shit. Always.

      There will be minor scratches visible, but it will be only couple hundred to fix.

      So would replacing the fender if the clueless noob who owns the car knew anything about auto body work. The article says a large part of the cost was for labour, which means he got ripped off. It's a more involved process than for other cars, but the labour on something like that shouldn't have cost more than a couple hundred. I could have replaced that shit in an hour by myself.

    24. Re:The king of expensive repairs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need parking sensors of any kind, you don't deserve your license and shouldn't be on the road.

  10. No, Inexpensive by albeit+unknown · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a bargain if the safety feature prevented a $30,000 hospital bill.

    Let's go back to no crumple zones where you can pound out a front end collision with a hammer and clean out the passengers with a fire hose.

    1. Re:No, Inexpensive by PPH · · Score: 1

      Let's go back to no crumple zones

      I could just ride a motorcycle.

      So give me a motorcycle with two more wheels, an enclosed passenger cabin, heat, air conditioning and a comfy bench seat.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:No, Inexpensive by sunking2 · · Score: 2

      I agree, cars are so much safer its not even funny. People under 40 have no idea how much the industry has improved in safety, mileage, HP and comfort.

      But what does have to happen is going back to the 5 mph bumper rules. The current 2.5 mph is a joke. A parking lot bumper bump that barely exchanged paint costing $3k+ and slamming your insurance rates is insane and hits the less well off unfairly. The poor shouldn't have their rates jacked because someone else decides they want to drive a $100k car and bumpers touch.

    3. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there was the Yugo.

      I think it is called Yaris now.

    4. Re: No, Inexpensive by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 2

      Stay a motorcycle only add one extra wheel. And in some states seat belts and enclosed cabin with a wheel like control eliminate the endorsement requirement.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    5. Re: No, Inexpensive by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      5mph RUBBER bumpers. Painted bumpers are BULLSHIT... graze something, $500 minimum paint job to fix. I went out of my way to get black rubber bumpers on my truck, and it's the best thing I ever did. Small scuff? Fine-grit sandpaper, 2 minutes of rubbing, fixed.

    6. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $30K Hospital Bill? You mean where you wee taken by ambulance and checked out with scratches, but kept overnight, just in case. If you get any kind of surgery then double to quadruple that.

    7. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least give people the choice. The argument made is, when a safety feature is made mandatory, it doesn't cost all that much more because every car will have it, driving costs down. The problem is, once it becomes mandatory, it must be present to pass inspection. Then, someone has to shell out $1000+ for a completely unnecessary feature they may not even want.

      Also, some of these safety features are horrible. My Toyota has this brake assist garbage (I think I read this is now mandatory in the EU). When you come off the gas very quickly, it decides you are in a panic situation and changes the behavior of the brakes making them much more sensitive! Think about that, the behavior of a basic control to the car completely changes in nature. It is incredibly easy to suddenly find yourself with screeching tires as the ABS kicks in when all you were doing was reacting quickly to a situation. I'm going to get rear ended with this stupid system. The claim is people don't generally take advantage of their ABS systems and don't tend to push hard enough on the brake. Therefore, brake assist tries to force you into maximum braking, no matter if you need it or not. Just give me the choice to turn the system off. When in a panic stop, I'm keeping track of what is in front and behind me trying to determine if I need to maneuver.

    8. Re:No, Inexpensive by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

      I agree, cars are so much safer its not even funny. People under 40 have no idea how much the industry has improved in safety, mileage, HP and comfort.

      I had no idea cars have more hit points than they used to. But I've definitely seen improved reliability. I seem to remember when cars used to be nearly worthless at 100K miles. It's pretty much expected they'll last that long these days, plus quite a bit longer. And they spend far less time in the shop being tweaked and tuned than I remember as a kid. Granted, I'm a data point of one, but from what I hear, that's the general experience as well. On occasion people get stuck with a lemon, but that's always been the case.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:No, Inexpensive by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I had no idea cars have more hit points than they used to. But I've definitely seen improved reliability. I seem to remember when cars used to be nearly worthless at 100K miles. It's pretty much expected they'll last that long these days, plus quite a bit longer. And they spend far less time in the shop being tweaked and tuned than I remember as a kid. Granted, I'm a data point of one, but from what I hear, that's the general experience as well. On occasion people get stuck with a lemon, but that's always been the case.

      It goes both ways - reliability has gone way up but so have prices, so corners are cut elsewhere. These days if you buy a car that needs a service every 5000 miles or 4 times a year, it's considered a high maintenance vehicle. You can buy vehicles that need only one servicing every 20k miles or once a year (average distance driven is around 20k miles a year, so 100k is a 5 year old car). That's one oil change a year and pretty much the limiting factor. Owning one of these vehicles is quite something since you only do it once a year and the cost isn't very high (maybe $500 all told) versus a car that needs 4 $300 services every few months.

      Granted, there are corners cut - so your car may only last about 10-15 years before needing a major maintenance (that's 200k-300k miles) which usually involves stuff like timing belts and other high items. In the 90s, you can probably get one that lasts 20+ years.

      Of course, having all this stuff is handy - side view cameras make parking a snap (though you always have idiots who can't park, or use every aid available to park properly and not make it impossible for you to get in your car). And pedestrians, who love to text and walk right into traffic wearing nothing but all black at night.

    10. Re:No, Inexpensive by houghi · · Score: 1

      You used to go to your checkup as well. The milage between them has gone up by a factor of 3-4. They also use less gass.

      You can look at repairs. What you should be looking at is the cost of the car over its life. Has that gone up or down when looking at a car of the same price.
      Do not compare models, as they will increase in price over time. Compare it to bit-rot where they keep addding stuff to it. Especially on the cheap cars. They do this, so people after a few years THINK that the car they go after is a cheap one, as that is what it was 5 years ago.

      In Europe you have seen this with the VW Polo. In the beginning a cheap car. Now? Not so much anymore.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:No, Inexpensive by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Move to somewhere with free healthcare and then it's a choice between an expensive repair bill on the car, or a few weeks paid leave from work sitting in a hospital bed.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:No, Inexpensive by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      The article isn't about the cost of body work. It's about the cost of buying, installing, and (possibly) calibrating sensor devices.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    13. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The car I drive today (2013 Hyundai Veloster) gets about the same mileage as my first car (1997 Geo Metro), performs about the same, has worse ergonomics, a far more uncomfortable ride, and is built like a POS compared to the Metro. Where are these improvements?

    14. Re:No, Inexpensive by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Timing belt should be replaced every 60k - 100k depending but if you like your car do it before it goes out and save yourself some money.

      I didn't need AAA to tell me that it's more expensive to replace a bumper with a back up camera and sensors than one with out it's no brainer the more complex you make it the more it will cost to repair. I see a lot of expensive cars out there with all the trimming but that doesn't make them a quality vehicle.

    15. Re:No, Inexpensive by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Places with free healthcare tend to have mandatory insurance as well.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re: No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the point. We are not talking about 1960s frame design we are talking about the unnecessary use of tech gadgets. But then again you are probably a shitty driver and need those rear bumper sensors in order to parallel park.

    17. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the free healthcare cover the missing legs, the painkiller addiction, and the agonizing heartbreak every time you think of your dead family that were in the other seats?

      The safety features exist for a reason.

    18. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about bumpers that can take a 5kph hit with no serious problems, protects the expensive sensors, while the rest of the structure and supports can deform and absorb the energy of a high speed impact? Then these low speed simple bumps and bruises don't end up unnecessarily costing thousands to repair?

    19. Re:No, Inexpensive by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Those bumpers are effectively banned by CAFE requirements in the USA.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    20. Re:No, Inexpensive by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I knew a veloster was a piece of shit, but as slow as a Metro?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    21. Re:No, Inexpensive by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Will the free healthcare cover the missing legs

      No, but you'll get free wheelchair and crutches.

      the painkiller addiction

      Yes

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    22. Re:No, Inexpensive by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Those things aren't completely mutually exclusive. It's possible make a car that's safe in a collision but still resilient against damage in minor collisions like in a parking lot. Today's cars are very fragile, and it's not just the tech. They've basically eliminated the protruding bumpers in favor of internal bumpers, which means that if you hit anything now you'll smash a light or a grill, and the lights on today's cars are very expensive and easy to damage (compare to the sealed beams from 30 years ago - cheap, standardized, and easy to replace if damaged). A lot of cars have also eliminated the rub strips along the side which makes them more susceptible to dings and scratches.

      A lot of the problem with the tech in the examples isn't that the sensors and cameras themselves are getting damaged, it's just that they are built into parts that are easily damaged in a minor accident and end up further complicating the repair.

      Personally, I have to wonder if this isn't done on purpose a bit. Building a car that falls apart or has a major mechanical failure after a few years is no longer acceptable. So instead build a car that is overly fragile and expensive to fix, and therefore tip the fix vs. scrap and replace scale in your favor. And since insurance is paying for, people aren't going to mind as much.

    23. Re: No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it doesn't cost $500 to paint a bumper cover.

    24. Re:No, Inexpensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Safety features" are only needed by people who don't know how to drive.

  11. Bullshit by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My brother's 2 year old Nissan Sentra with 15k miles on it cost him $11500. It's a strippy. CD Player and a jack 3.5" for your phone, AC and an Automatic. About as basic as it gets (it's 2018, a CD player costs $5 bucks to make, no, it's not a "luxury" when they're that cheap).

    Cars are more expensive because fewer and fewer people can afford them. That means fewer used cars. That means higher used car prices, which the car manufacturers see as cue to raise prices. Cars are also a necessity in most places. Even most major cities lack viable public transportation. When the commutes 90 minutes by car it's 3 hours by bus. That's not an inconvenience, that's a life altering event. The car companies decided how our cities were built before any of us were born (assuming there's nobody under 70 reading this). We're living with the consequences.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Bullshit by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Cars are more expensive because fewer and fewer people can afford them.

      I think my head just exploded.

    2. Re:Bullshit by jrumney · · Score: 1

      it's 2018, a CD player costs $5 bucks to make

      Curious as to your source for this.

    3. Re:Bullshit by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Cars are more expensive because fewer and fewer people can afford them. That means fewer used cars. That means higher used car prices, which the car manufacturers see as cue to raise prices.

      https://d3fy651gv2fhd3.cloudfr... sure doesn't look like a graph of fewer and fewer people being able to afford new cars to me.

      Used car sales appear flat but not plummeting as well: https://www.thoughtco.com/used...

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Bullshit by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      CD

      ? What is that?

      Seriously the last time I had a car and played one of those things on it was pre-2001. Try looking for a decent radio that plays mp3s or blue tooth, even a 3.5mm jack is pretty old school.

      Plus side with mp3s you can have 16+ hours of tunes and no inane dj chatter on a long drive.

  12. Yep by kackle · · Score: 1

    I've used the same trusted mechanic for 30 years, and he said that he's been watching the cost of repairs shoot upward, with my $700 repair bill being the lowest of all of his customers' bills that day. I can hear his frustration with the (in my opinion, needless) technology found in today's vehicles. He's getting pushed out of doing repairs little by little because the software and jigs are too expensive to purchase and keep up with. Did you know that one can now rent certain auto-repair software for so many hours? He tries to troubleshoot the problems within those time windows. Even the manufacturers know that it's gotten too ridiculous to own all the digital tools to troubleshoot everything for every model, every year.

    I know the ignorant car buyer just wants the toys and doesn't consider the extra pollution or future repair bills, nor the fact that such "features" will make the car too expensive to repair in the future, sending it to the junkyard even sooner. My mother's 15-year old Buick's dash is lit up like a Christmas tree because the box that runs all those bells and whistles hasn't been made in 5 years. Luckily the car still drives.

    However, I also blame the ignorant members of Congress, past and present, who ONLY considered that higher MPG might mean less air pollution, not the extra expenses we all quietly pay to get our rolling computers fixed, the complexity that befuddles the average person/mechanic and the extra wasted man-hours dealing with that complexity.

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linking the added complexity and added electronic whiz-bang that manufacturers have tacked on to the Congressional MPG CAFE standards... is just ignorantly lumping unrelated things. Smog pumps/Cats aren't killing ECU's.
      If you crash hard enough to smash up your engine, that's a totally different problem than way-too-expensive bumper sensors being smashed in a 5mph parking lot crush.

      Your initial argument about repair shops being unable to keep up with SW kit prices is valid, then you went into bullshit at the end. Truncate and save yourself the fail.

    2. Re:Yep by dryeo · · Score: 2

      However, I also blame the ignorant members of Congress, past and present, who ONLY considered that higher MPG might mean less air pollution, not the extra expenses we all quietly pay to get our rolling computers fixed, the complexity that befuddles the average person/mechanic and the extra wasted man-hours dealing with that complexity.

      You're blaming the wrong people, well mostly. Governments (its a first world thing) are responsible for pushing clean and efficient, people demanded clean, as the city air used to be horrible, at least here. And there is only so much oil. Getting it can involve supporting horrible people, making a big mess digging it up now a days and there is a chance that CO2 affects the climate.
      Car companies come up with all this other expensive shit. A car company decided to make the heating and air conditioning push button and controlled by a computer with resulting high costs to troubleshoot. A car company decided to save money by putting unrelated stuff on the same bus, including re-purposing computers in ways that make trouble shooting expensive.
      Even the safety stuff the government now makes mandatory was usually developed and pushed by the car companies. And there, once again government is responding to a wish from the voting public for maximum safety.
      The real problem is capitalism and the way people are. The automobile industry is mature and competitive, so they have to come up with gadgets and push them to sell cars and now the gadgets are complex and proprietary.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    3. Re:Yep by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. If people were clamoring for clean and efficient you wouldn't see the vast majority of drivers on the road singly in SUVs. It is regulatory capture and the large automakers love it.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  13. Dumb enough to buy gadgets you get what you wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are dumb enough to buy thousands of dollars in gadgets you won't need in a car, you get what you asked for.

    Rather have $500 to pay an extra car payment than side cameras, a UX drool of the cars startup animation, a touch screen console control, usb charger, auto controls on AC, bluetooth, hands free phone calling, text message spoken aloud, voice activated garbage, headlights that turn when are turning, wipers on headlights, headrests that force your head forward so it's like being in a too small airline seat, tire pressure gagues in the rim, cd player, aux input, lights in the sun visors, overhead light that dims when you start hte car, gps, stay in lane computer, auto braking, ........

    45% of features in a complex machine / software are never used

  14. It's also the construction. by shess · · Score: 2

    The technology is one bit, but is there any reason why there has to be a single unit which encompasses the front end around to the wheels, and integrates the lights and grill? As a result, you can't easily just replace a broken piece, you have to replace the entire assembly.

    [One reason is fuel efficiency. The assembly has fewer gaps to catch the wind. Another reason is reliability, the assembly is constructed as a unit and doesn't rely on as many people being successful. But there are probably alternative approaches which could give similar results.]

    1. Re:It's also the construction. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Mechanic here. Most autos do NOT have a "single unit" as you describe. Their front ends are typically composed of plastic fairing/bumper covers with crush zone components behind them. They are modular and replaced by mechanics and DIYers every day.
      You do not typically have to replace "the entire assembly" UNLESS the crash got the nose and both fenders. That collection of parts is referred to as a "front clip". Salvage yards often sell them together.
      The best method is to replace a front clip with clean good USED parts of the same paint color as those were painted at the factory and include minor hardware you'd otherwise have to buy by the piece. Used parts often have paint of similar age. Aged paint is difficult to match and paint jobs tend to be expensive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  15. Standard parts is the answer. by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is where the cell phone right to repair shop needs to get busy. The problem arises because the sensors for your Chevy Corvette may be different, for no good reason, than your Chevy Silverado. Different mounting or whatever. Just like in the past your Lincoln Mark V could have front end parts at $800 but the exact same part from a ford truck might be $250. Different part numbers. Same exact part. Well now they do things like create skus based on trim parts that may not even be damaged. But they differentiate the parts you can order. TPMS sensors are particularly overpriced as OEM parts, and they are periodically replaced. Equivalent after market parts? They are significantly cheaper. Car key fob? Or keyed key? The exact same key at the dealer with a FOB, $180 for the pair $200 to program it. After market $25 for the pair, including instructions to program it yourself in the car. Factory parts can be hugely inflated because they stock so many skus for many many years. Standardization is the way to drop the prices. Fewer skus.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  16. Ahoy there, AC! by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    increased base prices for a thing increase the cost of repairing that thing because the demand for repairs goes up. Who knew?

    The damage done by cash for clunkers was 9 years ago. The effects are long gone.

    Not gay, but if I was Obama'd be a better choice then our current president.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re: Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeNot goy?â Are you that crazy nazi poster? When demand for cars goes up they sell more cars, this keeping the price per car at a level many people can afford one. Demand doesnâ(TM)t drive prices up by itself.

    2. Re: Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Your calling was motivational speaker? Your the reason there are guys like Trump you dumb fuck.

    3. Re:Ahoy there, AC! by MachineShedFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The effects are not long gone. There are many cars that were purposefully destroyed under Cash for Clunkers that could have otherwise been dismantled and resold as used parts. Instead our lovely government had dealerships pouring sand into the engine and running it until it seized in order to qualify for the subsidy.

      The amount of engines destroyed for no purpose was ludicrous, and the remaining fleet of cars where people could have gotten used parts to keep their car running now have much more expensive repairs, if they can find parts at all, for cars that really aren't that old and definitely were not uncommon.

      Cash for Clunkers was a corporate giveaway to the auto industry with a very thin whitewash of "raising overall fuel efficiency" applied to sell it. It was wasteful in practically every way.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, those cars were "clunkers" 15 years ago. Yes it raised the price of used cars, briefly. Yes it was a giveaway to car companies whose sales had collapsed. Yes it was a giveaway to the owners of those "clunkers." There were a lot of corporate giveaways back then ... the banks were lent tens of billions of dollars at basically no cost until they made back enough money to be solvent again. Homeowners who had made terrible decisions not only got subsidies to keep their houses (keeping those houses from being made available to responsible would-be homeowners) but got special favorable tax treatment so those subsidies were tax free. It was a giveaway bonanza.

      If you seriously think that C2C is responsible for the prices of used cars today you need to find more up to date conspiracy websites to read.

    5. Re:Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash for Clunkers only required destroying the engine. It did not require that the whole vehicle be destroyed. It certainly did not prevent them being stripped for parts.

      dom

    6. Re: Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *you're

    7. Re:Ahoy there, AC! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The vehicles were required to crushed/shredded after a certain amount of time. While they could strip them for
      parts beforehand, the large sudden influx of vehicles meant they had to get started with crushing them right away, and the fact the most valuable part (the engine) was ruined meant a lot of dismantlers didn't even want to deal with them and the paperwork. So while some did get parted out, many of them did not.

      Given that one of the requirements that the vehicle was driveable when it was turned in, it was sad to see intact vehicles, most of which were still in good condition cosmetically, get fed to shredder one after the other.

    8. Re:Ahoy there, AC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember buying a 1989 Volvo 760 Turbo for $800 back in 2012.

      That car got horrible gas mileage, but it was reliable, had heated seats and ran well for 2 years, giving my wife and I enough time to purchase an entry level new car (2015 Base Model Nissan Versa w/ 5spd manual) for $10,000.

      The "bad" car allowed my wife and I the opportunity to move up.

      These days it would be impossible to find something equivalent.

  17. GM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i repair my GM constantly. Its not tech related. Its just craply made.

  18. 3000? thats just the start by redback · · Score: 1

    The radar sensor on the front of my car is over $3k just for that one part, let alone the rest of the front.

  19. sell me a basic car then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants all this tech? not me...

  20. And guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this will be mandatory in a few years for "safety" because fuck anyone that isn't rich.

    1. Re: And guess what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your special Subaru comes in a variety of models. Of course you get the all wheel drive, but the rest is leather seats, GPS, onstar or whatever they are putting in them now, etc. most of the end price is not for the safety features Subaru sells. It is for the other stuff. Subaru just does a better job telling customers what is in the car and what it can do than some other manufacturers. The smart dealers make sure they have an excellent service department that can handle repair requests quickly from the many customers who buy the cars from them. Customers are not buying all wheel drive. They are buying leather and GPS - AWD has to be there to make the customer feel safe

  21. They just noticed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [S]eemingly small damages to a vehicle's front end can incur costs nearing $3,000

    That's been the case for a of couple decades now. If your car is going to need any body panels replaced and any paint applied, it's going to be in the thousands automatically.

    This is not new. We don't have giant metal bumpers on the front of our cars like the early 80s anymore.

    1. Re:They just noticed? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Giant" doesn't mean what you think it means. Do not be overly impressed by expanses of chromed sheet metal. Bumpers didn't protect much and were not seriously thick. They were large chrome decorations.
      BTW 1980s build quality usually sucked, VW and Toyota (which were less complex than today) excepted.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:They just noticed? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Water cooled VWs have _always_ sucked. But they reached amazing new levels of suck about 20 years ago with the new beetle.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  22. How about the car use my smartphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No need for an in vehicle radio/xm, navigation or environmental controls. Just a Bluetooth connection and a vehicle systems app on the phone.

    The phone can also have an Onstar app that would know when airbags deployed.

    1. Re: How about the car use my smartphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is stopping you from buying that if you can find a seller

  23. Cayenne faggot hauls nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell, this moron hauls his worthless ass around only because mommy refuses his ass now. She can't be seen with a dork like that, she's trying to get LAID!

  24. YMMV indeed by raymorris · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I also drive an F250 Super Duty King Ranch ... YMMV

    Your Mileage May Vary indeed.
    It may vary between 10 mpg and 16 mpg.

  25. Now look faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you work for my money? No? Then shut the fuck up. My work, my money, my purchase. That's how it operates.

    The minute you bankroll my life is when you have say. Otherwise fuck off.

    1. Re: Now look faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The federal and state government puts restrictions on your purchases and doesn't bankroll you, so that really isn't how it works.

      They tax you instead, unless of course you're on all those lib monthly entitlement funds.

    2. Re:Now look faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly the complainers likely don't own much of anything of great value.

    3. Re:Now look faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever see it, I'll be sure to smash up your piece of shit truck and make you watch as I do it, wimp.

  26. Re:Tech? NOPE! ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These issue are PRECISELY why I go for older cars.
    Everything I own, 6 vehicles in various conditions,
    is *before* 2000. You can find good gas mileage there.
    My babies are pre-1990 and get 32mpg highway, and
    have hardly any computers, and the diesel has none,
    it will survive an EMP pulse, lol.
    Bog standard cheap as hell parts on all of them.

    Yes, if I were to go all out, I'd buy a brand new Tesla.

    But for now, the economics, purchase, maintenance,
    risk of accident costs, etc simply don't add up.

    Oh, and my oil burners have nice weldable chassis
    that can easily be converted to electrics later on.
    I'm tempted to do that right now with one of the trucks
    and a motor from a tesla wreck.

  27. It's expensive because of dealers. by Charcharodon · · Score: 2

    Not even a little bit true. Most repairs cost so much is people don't bother trying to do it themselves. It's amazingly simple to implement most car repairs these days with a modest tool box and a copy of the manufacturer repair manuals for the car. Combine that with the fact that you can order parts online for a fraction of what the dealer will charge you. My last air conditioning repair took a $25 (fried relay). The dealer wanted $750 to do the same fix that took me longer to type up in this comment than to do. (Open the hood, took off a plastic cover over the fuse box, found the relay, pulled it out with a pair of pliers, stuck the new one in.)

    1. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most repairs are not the kind you can do yourself. The fact that the relay is in your fuse box means that it's essentially a consumable that the owner is expected to be able to replace. I would hope things like air filters, fuses, relays, spark plugs, and fluids would be relatively little labor to replace.

      I just saw an article about a guy who made a small dent in his Tesla's fender and it took 30 hours of labor to replace because the backseat had to be disassembled to disconnect the high voltage cables from the battery and then the whole side of the car had to be disassembled. Then everything had to be reassembled and sensors needed to be recalibrated.

      This was at an authorized repair shop, not a Tesla dealer (which is owned by Tesla, so it's more like a store).

      dom

    2. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "copy of the manufacturer repair manuals for the car"

      Good luck getting that.

    3. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > It's amazingly simple to implement most car repairs these days with a modest tool box and a copy of
      > the manufacturer repair manuals for the car.

      I own a recent vintage car (2013 Hyundai) and you simply cannot "get a copy of the manufacturer repair manual". You can pay to "access" it via a website for a limited amount of time or a certain number of times (after you setup up an account). If you own a shop, you can pay an annual fee to have unlimited access to this information. But getting a copy of the manufacturer's repair manual means renting it or downloading an unauthorized copy.

      Dealers are part of the problem, the manufacturer contributes quite a bit.."Nobody (repairs/will repair) our cars except us".

    4. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There are less and less expectations on owners to change consumables themselves...
      It used to be that the driving tests in some countries required you to do things like check the coolant and change a wheel. Things like light bulbs are becoming increasingly difficult to replace on some modern cars, and a lot of people don't even know how to do simple things like change lightbulbs at home.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    5. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You basically cannot order OEM parts online for less than the cost the local dealer would charge. For bodywork that is what you are looking at. Not talking about sparkplugs here.

    6. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are vastly overestimating the capabilities of the average car owner. What you didn't account for was the time and expertise it took to diagnose the actual problem. $750 does sound a little high, but when you are paying the mechanic, and the associated overhead, to do all of the work for you (diagnose the problem, order/buy the parts, install the parts, complete the paperwork to track said work and costs, etc.), the time and cost is going to be much higher than you indicated.

    7. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I dealt with a similar relay issue and it took a solid day for me to identify the problem, isolate the failure points, test them, and locate the part that had failed. I'm not a car person though, so I had to start by getting advice about the nature of the failure mechanism ("This is what it's doing, what could be causing it?"). Actually buying and installing the part was a piece of cake. Knowing what part to replace, not so much.

    8. Re:It's expensive because of dealers. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Individuals can get access to Helm etc.

      https://www.helminc.com/helm/p...

      BTW many schools have a wide variety of manuals available online. Community colleges offering auto repair courses usually do.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. It's not the tech by Tyr07 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What it is, is advanced marketing techniques, improved market cornering, and a better legal understand to prevent lawsuits for shady business practices.

    The tech, the tech, the tech. The new USB connector, which is the same as the old one, but with a slightly different shape you pay 20$ for. It costs the store 0.70$, and to make it probably less than a fraction of a penny. The 0.70 cents the store pays covers the shipping and logistics of it.

    It's all market price gouging cornering. It's been going on for thousands of years. Greedy people try to corner the market and increase price at the max rate that won't cause rebellion on their products, and lobby to prevent competition, and any competition there is has to play by their rules or else they'll sue them to financial ruin, even if they lose the court case, the money the large company loses suing them is minor, compared to the threat of competition, and the small company loses its market entrance point, it gives time while financially ruining them for the large company to make competing products, and that's what they do.

    You literally have people who know they have no legal ground to stand on, but just the effort to prove that will ruin your company, trashing companies, and making your prices higher.

  29. Cars are inefficient by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    I'm obviously not a 'car person' as all new cars look the same to me - identical bulges, curves and massive footprints that make parking a nightmare.

    1. Re:Cars are inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your valuable input to a discussion about cars. ;)

  30. Changing headlight is a major operation by aberglas · · Score: 2

    In modern cars. I could not do it myself in my Citroen. The mechanic had special tools and an endoscope. For a Reno, you need to pull off the bumper amongst other things.

    (I like French cars. So cheap second hand.)

    1. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      In modern cars. I could not do it myself in my Citroen. The mechanic had special tools and an endoscope. For a Reno, you need to pull off the bumper amongst other things.

      No in "modern" but not in recent cars. There was a period where it was especially problematic, but there are several places now where regulations were passed requiring lightbulbs in headlamps to be replacable without removing the assembly or what is behind it.

      Check under the bonnet of the latest Citroen of your model, you may find it is much easier to do now. Basically for everything between 2005-2015 you were screwed.

    2. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So cheap second hand."

      Because no one else likes them :)

    3. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah I had an 07 Mazda3 that the manual said "see a dealer" to replace the headlamp. Youtube showed me how to do it. Oddly, after that one got totaled I replaced it with a new CX-5 and it has LED headlamps that are designed to last longer than the car, and must be entirely replaced if they do all burn out. The whole assembly is the 'bulb'. It gave me pause but we'll see how they do.

    4. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      My current car requires the battery to be removed to access one of the headlights. Doable, but it's far more of a pain in the ass than it needs to be. Replacing the actual bulb is pretty trivial to do, and doesn't require any tools if your fingernails are strong enough. Pulling out the battery, however? That requires a screwdriver, a wrench, and a fair bit of cussing.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    5. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Better than an old English car. To replace the headlights on one of those you start by removing the _rear_ bumper and disassemble forward until you reach the headlight.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Changing headlight is a major operation by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The whole assembly is the 'bulb'. It gave me pause but we'll see how they do.

      That's almost full circle to how the auto industry was in America in the 60s.

  31. Re:Tech? NOPE! ;-) by sad_ · · Score: 1

    not always true, sometimes it gets really hard to find certain parts and then it gets expensive again.
    just ask any retro car owner/lover how cheap his car parts are.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  32. Meh, i just prefer to drive safely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increasing the amount of safety gear in cars doesnt make for greater safety... it just makes for greater dependence on safety gear. If you give someone a safer car they'll drive more recklessly.

  33. Interchangeable Parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A long time ago this guy invented something called interchangeable parts... Most of the stuff we are complaining about are components of something that was designed, parts created, assembled in a batch series and forgotten. So some gang in China get a bunch of containers full of widget parts, makes them and off they go. The parts are intentionally unique to this batch because the real intent is to make it difficult and expensive to service -- so when there is a problem the easy thing is to throw it away and get a new one. (And don't ask about recycling the old stuff...). Cars are just a bigger instance of the problem. The folks who make them have little incentive to make them serviceable -- and when styling is poured over the concoction it becomes even worse. But as long as we have a world where this months Buick has to look different than last months... the problem will continue. Maybe 3d printing can address this... but I suspect the manufacturers will make that difficult. After all, who will by the output of their factories? And isn't profit and waste the name of the game in the end?

  34. Government Regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the government regulation that now requires that technology to be installed in the bumper (rear view camera in the US)?

  35. Bolt On Safety Systems by sycodon · · Score: 1

    You can buy many of these built in safety systems and bolt them on.

    Lane departure
    Back up cameras
    Collision Avoidance

    Sure...maybe suspect or poor quality at the moment, but it will only get better,

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  36. Total Cost of Ownership. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid, my Father was always working on the car, Tuning the Engine, replacing parts that had seemed to fall off, welding parts back on, Cutting off rust and putty and painting it back again....

    So now it cost $3000 to replace something that you could do yourself. However you had normally had that car for much longer then the life of the cars before that, So other then paying $5000 of maintenance over the life time you are paying $3000 once.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  37. Complexity due to safety and emissions by sinij · · Score: 1

    Modern cars are unnecessary complex to meet safety and emission regulations. These are not "free", they add both upfront and lifetime costs.

    You legislated 40MPG, 5 star offset crash rating, collision avoidance-equipped car and you go it. Only it costs an arm and a leg to buy and repair.

    1. Re:Complexity due to safety and emissions by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Modern cars are unnecessary complex to meet safety and emission regulations. These are not "free", they add both upfront and lifetime costs. You legislated 40MPG, 5 star offset crash rating, collision avoidance-equipped car and you go it. Only it costs an arm and a leg to buy and repair.

      Better to pay an arm and a leg than to lose an arm and a leg.

    2. Re:Complexity due to safety and emissions by sinij · · Score: 1

      This is not how risk analysis works.

      Cost of remedial action = Cost of adverse action * Probability of adverse action.

  38. I'm calling BS on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife has an EGR valve that went out on her truck. This part that used to cost 20-40 bucks back in the 80's is now $400. That has nothing to do with "tech". That has to do with the fact that this little device which does NOTHING but help with emissions which is mandated by the government can be forced down our throats.

  39. LED turnlight replacement cost, someone? by Herve5 · · Score: 2

    You don't even need to look for überadvanced tech on today's cars.

    On all new cars these last years, the use of LEDs instead of bulbs allowed to install super cool, super fancy lights everywhere -for instance the fashion for turnlights recently was to wrap a luminous line of LEDs all around the stoplights, or even with ultra-zen shape inflections.
    Very sillily, I just thought 'Ahh, fashion...' in the beginning.

    This, until I understood that, from now on, whenever one of your stoplight or turlight dies, you cannot switch a 20-cent bulb there*.
    You now MUST get back to the original automaker, to politely ask for this complex plastic element, ultra-zen-shaped, that, obviously, no one else than them can provide.
    (Oh, and the left side isn't the same as the right side, mind you, don't confuse!)

    I'd say, you'll pay it not ten times, but one hundred times the bulb cost.

    Ahh, but this is for fashion, isn't it?

    (*) and even, have a complete light repair set within the volume of a smartphone, slipped somewhere in the car, allowing you to repair in 5mn straight in front of the cop if need be...

    --
    Herve S.
  40. Why are people here bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About being poor AF?

    Like it's a badge of honor or something...

    1. Re: Why are people here bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol imagine being this retarded childlike

    2. Re:Why are people here bragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because most of us have responsibilities and have to work for a living. You'll understand when mommy and daddy stop providing for you and you have to enter the real world, kid.

  41. Honda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honda wants $40 for an HR-V front-bumper tow hook cover.

    It turns out there's a huge market for these things: people steal them (which takes 2 seconds) and sell them on eBay for half what Honda charges.

    1. Re:Honda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So buy one from Amazon for $20. I never buy factory branded parts. The generics are the exact same thing or at least good enough at a fraction of the cost.

      I only paid $25 each for two new front fenders, $50 for a new rear bumper cover, $25 for a new side mirror and $25 for new hatchback lift struts for my Honda. All parts are well made and have held up fine.

  42. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not if it has a stock bumper which haven't been designed to "bump" anything serious for several decades. A reinforced aftermarket bumper can easily transmit shock to the crush zones on the frame and total (write off in insurance terms) the truck. If frame crush zones function as designed by buckling it's a total even if the rest of the vehicle is basically unhurt. Cab floor buckling is also a total. BTW rollovers often yield good rolling chassis and frame hits often yield usable cabs since the front clip (grille, core brace, fenders, etc) is easily replaced. I helped build many used trucks from donors while working at a used car lot. Done right it's no big deal. I've driven one of them for several years.
    When you buy a used truck, lift the mats and look at the cab floor, then crawl beneath with a bright flashlight and look for signs of repairs because some outfits don't do the right thing which is REPLACE damaged frames and cabs, not straighten/heat/beat/weld.

  43. CFC myths deconstructed. by couchslug · · Score: 2

    CFC was in 2009 and that's ancient history in the salvage business. The crushed vehicles were typically over ten years old. Who drives that ancient shit today? What parts shortage?
    I worked in the used car/auction/salvage biz at the time and nothing about CFC rules required crushing the good components. Buyers had a limited time to strip profitable parts then were required to crush the hull, long block (engine sans accessories) and transmission.
    Most yards bought CFC cars at auction then parted them out. Wholesale and retail consumers bought those parts. All the engine accessories not oil-wetted were unaffected by the silicate and remained salable. It was economic to crush many as scrap prices (an important part of US foreign exchange) were high, but the vast majority of CFC vehicles no one would miss.
    Outliers make the news but any car or SUV over ten years old (specialty vehicles of course excepted) is worth so little most salvage yards crush them when over 100 hulls accumulate. (100 hulls make it profitable to call in portable crusher outfits who flatten the hulks then take them to the shredder.)
    Salvage yards usually have limited space and make money by turning over stock. Those CFC vehicles you mourn would have been long gone by now with or without CFC.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:CFC myths deconstructed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of cars from the late 90s that, if they were built right (e.g. not American car companies, not a VW built in Mexico) and weren't driven into another car, they have a good shot at still being on the road today.

      Sure, there are plenty of shitboxes that we're all better off without being on the road, just getting the vast majority of Chevy Impala / Ford Taurus / PT Cruisers / Dodge Neons off the road is a big improvement. But there are many other make / model combos that would be perfectly serviceable today even with 200k+ miles on the clock, because they weren't planned-obsolescence pieces of shit like many cars being produced today.

  44. High Tech Repairs by del_diablo · · Score: 1

    I agree.
    And yet i disagree, a lot.
    Because as you try to repair, you run into 3 issues:
    Can you reach the part without removing items, can you find readable documentation for the part(i.e manual) and can you physically poke all the connectors with a voltmeter?
    The general answer is that you can move your hands half a meter from the battery, and nothing is now accessible by hand. Which means if connectors are not exposed at doors or hinges, you can't diagnose them. Nor is cables mentioned anywhere.

    Oil filter and fluids is generally easy to access. Clutch oil? Not so much. Might not be mentioned in manual either.
    Fuses and tires are easy to change, so long you don't need to calibrate sensors.
    Lights? Assuming you can reach them, its possible. Bonus point for socket type not being mentioned in manual, so you need to remove them before entering store to buy replacements. Interior lights are harder, because they often have hinges that are hard to spot or pry.
    Relays are a nightmare to replace if they are not exposed, or if you don't know enough about electronics to poke the right ends with a voltmeter to find it.
    Springs and suspensions requires special tools and clamp to change safely.
    Coating frame underside is cheap. Having a way to elevate and have it elevated safely, so you don't need a gas mask while lying on the back: Not so cheap.
    Engine isn't so bad, but you need a tool to lift it. And you need to know how to connect it with everything, and possibly adjust all valves.
    Gasoline filter? It might not be exposed at all.
    Air filter tends to be exposed, and getting a new coal filter is like a dream for the first few hours driving.

  45. Only tech? by whitroth · · Score: 2

    Lessee, about 15 or so years ago, I had a Grand Voyager. One day, a window fell down. Took it to a mechanic, and he replaced the belt that raises and lowers it. $160. 8 or so years later, newer Grand Voyager, same thing: nope, the mechanic said, "we both know it's only the belt, but they've made it a sealeed unit, which includes the motro, but I have no choice now but to replace the whole thing (for twice the price).

    Oh, and about needing computers... my ancient, deally beloved Toyota Tercel wagon, an '86, with a carburetor, no computer, was a) still passing emission tests and b) getting 35-36mpg in 2000.

    Blame the car companies. They want you to buy a new car every two years, like back in the late fifties.

  46. Waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Knock off a side mirror equipped with a camera as part of a surround-view system? $500 to $1,100. "

    Do a simple shoulder check, no tech required: $0

  47. Cognitive Dissonance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if there's some cognitive dissonance going on here though?

    Hear me out, it goes something like this:

    1). I get into an accident, scares the crap out of me;
    2). Vehicle safety systems do an awesome job, I walk away unharmed;
    3). Time to fix the car, take it in for repair;
    4). Dinged with "high" bill (subjective assessment of course);
    5). Log on to internet and complain about "stupid gov't., rapacious manufacturers, clueless mechanics", etc.

    My point being, I am mentally equating "I walked away unharmed" with "my vehicle should be fixable for $20." It could be a matter of mentally classifying an accident as "minor" and believing that every part of the incident, including vehicle repair, should be minor too.

    When people get into a major accident, life-threatening injuries, hospital time, they don't complain about the fact that their car was totaled. No matter how much money was lost.

    Maybe, when escaping injury in an accident, people should be focusing on how well the safety systems worked, allowing them to escape injury? Rather than bitching about how much it cost to fix the car?

    1. Re:Cognitive Dissonance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what cognitive dissonance is. Go educate yourself.

      You don't seem to understand that people are capable of having independent feelings about different things. Yes, I would be happy I survived. No, I would not be happy that I have to pay a huge repair bill. See how that works?

      It's like you were born yesterday.

  48. Debt for Fun and Profit! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Nope. They sell a 50k car at a loss these days, knowing that they will fiance it and make all the profit off that. Dealers are merely lenders at this point, the product is somewhat meaningless.

  49. What the Market will Bear... Rawr! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Nope. Cars are more expensive now because for the last decade interest rates have basically been nothing. Seen by the fact that there were deals for ages for "0 percent financing". So free money. So people can borrow huge amounts. So they can afford more car. Car makers respond with, here have more car, and it will be expensive, but don't worry you can afford it just get an interest free loan for 8 years, etc...

    and here we are.

  50. 'Crash the Economy to further Communism?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what kind of kool aid have you been drinking?

    China is more Capitalist than America is now. Even if they feed that communism line to their citizens, everything is owned by the oligarchs, just like here in America, and almost nothing is owned by the workers.

  51. Hooray for internet tough guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You touch my car, I end your worthless little life, insect.

    And here I thought you were going to say: I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast.