Thank you for that, I had not even though of that, but I guess a greatly designed db, could also have a view per user for most info. Being that a terabyte now is 100$ at bestbuy, it would be cheap to make your db bigger, and use more views for users, which forces the record lines to be exactly their records none else. so instead of passing in any sort of parameter like ids etc...then you use the name of the view as per user name plus table, and voila, instant security, plus super speed for being precompiled to exactly what the user needs nothing more or less. Going to have to try that sometime...!!!
Use as much info as you can from the internet and other sources to get documents showing possible threats to health, and that you would be ok to move in but at a discounted rate.
Then once moved in, proceed to start jamming the panel by using such food stuffs as paints etc....shoot them using balloons(like water balloons). This will make a coating needing the company to come and clean up the panel, after a few times of this they might get the idea that being so close to a building was not such a good idea, and relocate.
Might also include some other tenants in on it, to make it a sort of game if you will, keep score so that the one with the most hits gets a free bottle of vodka or something.... you would be surprised at how much people will do for free booze.
Also, make sure that no one ever does it from their window, always from the roof. If a camera catches you (or witness) they can point to the window, if they see you from the roof, they can barely make out details. Then if ever approached, just say those pesky teenagers have been at it again.
Seriously, is there no regulation about such things, I know there is for hydro lines being too close to housing, why not cell towers?
How long before someone gets the bright idea to put their thing in that hole, and start a whole new cross species aids problem. Was the last time in Africa with baboons?
>You can imagine that taxpayers were upset and thankful they knew this information As if the people have any way of forcing the banks to do what they are supposed to do. The governments have a hard enough time keeping them honest as it is, because of the importance the banks have on a global scale, what are a few hundred angry clients going to do.... close their bank accounts...who suffers more the banks or the clients. This is the problem with the way the CEOs manage the corporations, especially when they touch so many lives in such a deep way. Short of being pulled out in the middle of the street and shot in a public display of justice, there is no way any CEO will learn this lesson. They are never accountable for anything they do, they hide behind corporate red tape. Obama even has a hard time making them do the right thing, he is one of the most powerful people on earth....but a few hundred armed with machetes waiting outside the CEOs home, wow, what a message that would send....almost sounds like Africa....almost.
You know it is funny that they should have to ask to be able to shut them down as they own the software that most is run on, and could somehow figure out how to shut them down through their loopholes the way they do people with legit copies of windows, and have to prove they have legit copies of windows, I also find it funny that they contacted verisign about this, seeing as they have the mass of dns servers online and could have sent out an easy fix in the actual firmware of their product to do more filtering of these sites then worry about getting verisign in on something they could have at some point said no to....but in the end, I enjoy the fact that they still did a good deed. Way to go M$, taking a step in the right direction.
I guess it would depend on...the fact that we can not compare a collision as we know it on earth to be the same as in space, mass, and weight and internal gravity as well as density of the metal on the outside of the hull. It would all play a small role, they might just bounce off each other and be off course, or they could totally be destroyed in a great ball of flame. I think we might have to test this out someday.
>So you're basically saying that they should hire people to look at every video posted to YouTube...
That is exactly what I am saying...
>Using advanced magic pixie technology, no doubt
Did you know they already have advanced software same used for facial recognition, that can recognize skin being shown, flesh tones, and are able to create an algorythm that flags certain images for nakedness, now of course videos are made up of multi-million images one after another (frames) but we have quad core computers as desktop computers now, so a Beowulf cluster of those wold do the trick. The story was covered on/. a while back, as well when I say a new slew, I mean still does not exist, but we have what we need to create it.
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it..."
I agree with google that this is not the best way to go about it.... but when you consider the implications of just what was being done to the poor kid. Child p0rnopgraphy, snuff movies, animal cruelty, mental abuse etc...the list goes on as certain things that should not be shown on the internet (or ever for that matter). If there was child p0rnography on youtube, would google execs have swallowed this pill any easier. would they have realized just what this video is equivalent to...
The exec will probably get a slap on the wrist in the very end, and a huge fine....but the message will be crystal clear to all other youtube like vendors.....you are responsible for your content. No more using , "we are not to be held liable for..." crap. If a newspaper printed a child in a somewhat sexually explicit manner, and came out saying, well we did not create the ad, we are not responsible for the picture used in the ad, they would get laughed at.
The courts just wanted to make a clear example of what will not be allowed on the internet.....i agree with them on that point. The most important part is that the rest of the community will realize how bad this situation is and start reviewing their own footage to make sure no crap is on there....
As for the exec, he has already made his millions, working for google, google made sure of it, and being their fall guy, is less destructive then them being tied as a whole to this situation. Now we will see a new slew of software that reads through the videos to check for illegal content such as this kid being abused. There are plenty of people in starving countries that can be asked to work for google on a per video basis that would be very happy to be included in a starting economy such as this one, not only to make some money but also get more technology in their country.
The first part I laughed at was that he had forgotten to make a backup of the program he used to make and read the backups... then I sort of forgot to read the rest,......wonder why.... : P
Web traffic and where people go can be open to public, but the contents of emails can not. Emails are used by companies as legal proof that communication has been made and could contain sensitive materials. As far as where people go on the internet, is like tracking someone when they are driving their car somewhere, anyone can do it, and you should not be offended when someone sees you and says, "yeah....i saw you driving by the other day, I waved, but you didn't see me..." that is not worth controlling. As for cell phones, I consider that cell phones again are a way to communicate which could contain sensitive insider information, so no that should not have easy access without a warrant
Um, this is for linux based routers, it does not mean it takes over your pc, as well, you have tripwire implementation (i imagine that is not used on those routers) within linux, that wold flag you as being infected right away.
I agree there is a serious lack of security for the bank system, I go to mine, and they do all their transactions through web based online banking using their credentials which give them elevated privileges, through the website. When I ask them to pay one of my bills, they log on, and access my account so they see all I see from my online banking, which tells me, if I can get a rootkit or keylogger, so can they, and theirs is more dangerous then ours.
I also asked the cashier if she could access the web (google and such) she said yes......then I asked her for her email in case i needed to send her some information about web security, she started to give it to me, and I told her to stop, and that she should never associate the 2, seriously misinformed by their network admins there!!
Really, which way are they coming from....wait a minute, if you know they are coming, you MUST be with them....oh no, they have found me already, I WILL NOT BE SILENCED, YOU FIENDS!
Makes you see just how much of a problem we do have, when we know that 100% of companies that are attacked, suffer serious losses, you would think the DoD or what not would try to implicate themselves a little more, or which org. would need to be so?
M$ paid alot of money to put this guy into a corner where he looks like he misrepresented the facts, and by doing so, made this whole issue go away. It would be nice to see if someone else that M$ could not corrupt, like Google, could test this very same thing, and give us an unbiased review as if it was just a regular company putting out a product and not some massive corporation with its tentacles everywhere, paying off everybody, and setting up fake benchmarks. I read on/. a while back their benchmarks had been tainted with misrepresentation, but I forget which post it was, maybe vista associated???
>if however your contract said that they reserved the right to block Thank you you just proved my point, most contracts residential people have mention nothing about the ISP blocking that port, only about reserving the right to send a thick 2X4 up your butt when they chose, and I think this is what all the class action lawsuits are talking about, you should be able to change something that affects the service at its origin when you first signed the contract.
There are laws against that too, do you have them in your country???
>find anything in here about a king of email and I'll withdraw all slurs on your knowledge of the field
umm, question....who is the one that decided that the meta headers for emails must contain the ipadress where it comes from, and who pushes for some sort of standard in trying to discern mime types....just asking. I guess if I want to add any sort of info into and email sent across the wire.... I could, I just would not be following a standard protocal set by??? a governing body perhaps?
I will give you some points for s few areas though, I have done some research on my end, and apparently in my country, there have been a few times when port 25 smtp was blocked for residential, but then unblocked, then re-blocked, then unblocked, so legally there might have been issues, but apparently in the US it is up to the ISP to decide if they block it, although some may block it, and others not...depends who you are with....so not everybody blocks it.
I still think legally because I am residential, I should have access to that port unless in my contract you specifically tell me it will be blocked, which is not the case, most do not write anything, then implement a change in behavior, which technically would alter the service therefor breaking the contract, but no one has money to waste on lawyers defending against giant crops that have whole teams of lawyers, so they put up with it, until a class action lawsuit comes up.
Anyways, have a great day, and a great year, I wish you all the best with your ISP in your country, lord knows you'll need it.
>You hate to see an incompetent IT person whose negligence... That's not what I said, don't twist what I am saying, I said I hate to see ANYBODY lose their job during this time where we are still somewhat in an economic crisis, I agree that many incompetent workers should get replaced, but they still have families, and they still need jobs, and anyone losing a job during these hard times are always worse off then when everybody is happy and making money.
Oh great, more MMO style nerd ranting and raving about what you are allowed to do and not to do if you do not want to be branded a noob. Thanks Wow for that....
Let the competitions begin, google will not be strong armed by the already monopolizing companies in place... i just hope they will be able to operate in more then just the US for their energy business.
I agree, if he were to rob a bank to pay off his debt, he might be able to end up owing less in the long run, with good behavior, and calculating how much he makes per hour vs. the time in jail, he might actually make money by robbing a bank, or insurance fraud of some sort, to pay off the RIAA, and then end up with free lunch everyday for a year. Pretty pathetic system if you ask me.
Slashdot Mirror
Thank you for that, I had not even though of that, but I guess a greatly designed db, could also have a view per user for most info. Being that a terabyte now is 100$ at bestbuy, it would be cheap to make your db bigger, and use more views for users, which forces the record lines to be exactly their records none else. so instead of passing in any sort of parameter like ids etc...then you use the name of the view as per user name plus table, and voila, instant security, plus
super speed for being precompiled to exactly what the user needs nothing more or less. Going to have to try that sometime...!!!
Use as much info as you can from the internet and other sources to get documents showing possible threats to health, and that you would be ok to move in but at a discounted rate.
Then once moved in, proceed to start jamming the panel by using such food stuffs as
paints etc....shoot them using balloons(like water balloons).
This will make a coating needing the company to come and clean up the panel, after a few times of this they might get the idea that being so close to a building was not such a good idea, and relocate.
Might also include some other tenants in on it, to make it a sort of game if you will, keep score so that the one with the most hits gets a free bottle of vodka or something.... you would be surprised at how much people will do for free booze.
Also, make sure that no one ever does it from their window, always from the roof. If a camera catches you (or witness) they can point to the window, if they see you from the roof, they can barely make out details. Then if ever approached, just say those pesky teenagers have been at it again.
Seriously, is there no regulation about such things, I know there is for hydro lines being too close to housing, why not cell towers?
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/02/27/2134204/US-Govt-Ending-Its-Hands-Off-the-Internet-Stance?art_pos=20
I guess your viewpoint might have to change after the US passes
their bill and forces the rest of the globe to follow suit.
How long before someone gets the bright idea to put their thing in that hole,
and start a whole new cross species aids problem.
Was the last time in Africa with baboons?
>You can imagine that taxpayers were upset and thankful they knew this information
As if the people have any way of forcing the banks to do what they are supposed to do. The governments have a hard enough time keeping them honest as it is, because of the importance the banks have on a global scale, what are a few hundred angry clients going to do.... close their bank accounts...who suffers more the banks or the clients. This is the problem with the way the CEOs manage the corporations, especially when they touch so many lives in such a deep way. Short of being pulled out in the middle of the street and shot in a public display of justice, there is no way any CEO will learn this lesson. They are never accountable for anything they do, they hide behind corporate red tape. Obama even has a hard time making them do the right thing, he is one of the most powerful people on earth....but a few hundred armed with machetes waiting outside the CEOs home, wow, what a message that would send....almost sounds like Africa....almost.
You know it is funny that they should have to ask to be able to shut them down as they own the software that most is run on, and could somehow figure out how to shut them down through their loopholes the way they do people with legit copies of windows, and have to prove they have legit copies of windows, I also find it funny that they contacted verisign about this, seeing as they have the mass of dns servers online and could have sent out an easy fix in the actual firmware of their product to do more filtering of these sites then worry about getting verisign in on something they could have at some point said no to....but in the end, I enjoy the fact that they still did a good deed. Way to go M$, taking a step in the right direction.
I guess it would depend on...the fact that we can not compare a collision as we know it on earth to be the same as in space, mass, and weight and internal gravity as well as density of the metal on the outside of the hull.
It would all play a small role, they might just bounce off each other and be off course, or they could totally be destroyed in a great ball of flame. I think we might have to test this out someday.
>So you're basically saying that they should hire people to look at every video posted to YouTube...
That is exactly what I am saying...
>Using advanced magic pixie technology, no doubt
Did you know they already have advanced software same used for facial recognition, /. a while back, as well when I say a new slew, I mean still does not exist, but we have what we need to create it.
that can recognize skin being shown, flesh tones, and are able to create an algorythm that flags certain images for nakedness, now of course videos are made up of multi-million images one after another (frames) but we have quad core computers as desktop computers now, so a Beowulf cluster of those wold do the trick. The story was covered on
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it..."
I agree with google that this is not the best way to go about it....
but when you consider the implications of just what was being done to the poor kid.
Child p0rnopgraphy, snuff movies, animal cruelty, mental abuse etc...the list goes on as certain things
that should not be shown on the internet (or ever for that matter).
If there was child p0rnography on youtube, would google execs have swallowed this pill any easier.
would they have realized just what this video is equivalent to...
The exec will probably get a slap on the wrist in the very end, and a huge fine....but the message will be crystal clear to all other youtube like vendors.....you are responsible for your content. No more using , "we are not to be held liable for..." crap.
If a newspaper printed a child in a somewhat sexually explicit manner, and came out saying, well we did not create the ad, we are not responsible for the picture used in the ad, they would get laughed at.
The courts just wanted to make a clear example of what will not be allowed on the internet.....i agree with them on that point.
The most important part is that the rest of the community will realize how bad this situation is and start reviewing their own footage to make sure no crap is on there....
As for the exec, he has already made his millions, working for google, google made sure of it, and being their fall guy, is less destructive then them being tied as a whole to this situation. Now we will see a new slew of software that reads through the videos to check for illegal content such as this kid being abused. There are plenty of people in starving countries that can be asked to work for google on a per video basis that would be very happy to be included in a starting economy such as this one, not only to make some money but also get more technology in their country.
The first part I laughed at was that he had forgotten to make a backup of the program he used to make and read the backups... ......wonder why.... : P
then I sort of forgot to read the rest,
Web traffic and where people go can be open to public, but the contents of emails can not.
Emails are used by companies as legal proof that communication has been made and could contain sensitive materials.
As far as where people go on the internet, is like tracking someone when they are driving their car somewhere, anyone can do it, and you should not be offended when someone sees you and says, "yeah....i saw you driving by the other day, I waved, but you didn't see me..." that is not worth controlling. As for cell phones, I consider that cell phones again are a way to communicate which could contain sensitive insider information, so no that should not have easy access without a warrant
Um, this is for linux based routers, it does not mean it takes over your pc,
as well, you have tripwire implementation (i imagine that is not used on those routers)
within linux, that wold flag you as being infected right away.
I agree there is a serious lack of security for the bank system, I go to mine, and they do all their transactions through web based online banking using their credentials which give them elevated privileges, through the website.
When I ask them to pay one of my bills, they log on, and access my account so they see all I see from my online banking, which tells me, if I can get a rootkit or keylogger, so can they, and theirs is more dangerous then ours.
I also asked the cashier if she could access the web (google and such) she said yes......then I asked her for her email in case i needed to send her some information about web security, she started to give it to me, and I told her to stop, and that she should never associate the 2, seriously misinformed by their network admins there!!
I think he meant name one botnet that is linux only, or contains linux implementations.
Really, which way are they coming from....wait a minute, if you know they are coming,
you MUST be with them....oh no, they have found me already,
I WILL NOT BE SILENCED, YOU FIENDS!
They've been silenced as well???
Makes you see just how much of a problem we do have, when we know that 100% of companies that are attacked, suffer serious losses, you would think the DoD or what not would try to implicate themselves a little more, or which org. would need to be so?
M$ paid alot of money to put this guy into a corner where he looks like he misrepresented the facts, and by doing so, made this whole issue go away. /. a while back their benchmarks had been tainted with misrepresentation, but I forget which post it was, maybe vista associated???
It would be nice to see if someone else that M$ could not corrupt, like Google,
could test this very same thing, and give us an unbiased review as if it was just a regular company putting out a product
and not some massive corporation with its tentacles everywhere, paying off everybody, and setting up fake benchmarks.
I read on
I guess ISO stands for nothing then...
"Less is more"
>if however your contract said that they reserved the right to block
Thank you you just proved my point, most contracts residential people have mention nothing about the ISP blocking that port, only about reserving the right to send a thick 2X4 up your butt when they chose, and I think this is what all the class action lawsuits are talking about, you should be able to change something that affects the service at its origin when you first signed the contract.
There are laws against that too, do you have them in your country???
>find anything in here about a king of email and I'll withdraw all slurs on your knowledge of the field
umm, question....who is the one that decided that the meta headers for
emails must contain the ipadress where it comes from, and who pushes for
some sort of standard in trying to discern mime types....just asking.
I guess if I want to add any sort of info into and email sent across the wire....
I could, I just would not be following a standard protocal set by???
a governing body perhaps?
I will give you some points for s few areas though, I have done some research on my end, and apparently in my country, there have been a few times when port 25 smtp was blocked for residential, but then unblocked, then re-blocked, then unblocked, so legally there might have been issues, but apparently in the US it is up to the ISP to decide if they block it, although some may block it, and others not...depends who you are with....so not everybody blocks it.
I still think legally because I am residential, I should have access to that port unless in my contract you specifically tell me it will be blocked, which is not the case, most do not write anything, then implement a change in behavior, which technically would alter the service therefor breaking the contract, but no one has money to waste on lawyers defending against giant crops that have whole teams of lawyers, so they put up with it, until a class action lawsuit comes up.
Anyways, have a great day, and a great year,
I wish you all the best with your ISP in your country, lord knows you'll need it.
>You hate to see an incompetent IT person whose negligence...
That's not what I said, don't twist what I am saying, I said I hate to see ANYBODY lose their job during this time where we are still somewhat in an economic crisis, I agree that many
incompetent workers should get replaced, but they still have families, and they still
need jobs, and anyone losing a job during these hard times are always worse off then
when everybody is happy and making money.
Oh great, more MMO style nerd ranting and raving about what you are allowed to do and not to do if you do not want to be branded a noob. Thanks Wow for that....
Let the competitions begin, google will not be strong armed by the already monopolizing companies in place...
i just hope they will be able to operate in more then just the US for their energy business.
I agree, if he were to rob a bank to pay off his debt, he might be able to end up owing less in the long run, with good behavior, and calculating how much he makes per hour vs. the time in jail, he might actually make money by robbing a bank, or insurance fraud of some sort, to pay off the RIAA, and then end up with free lunch everyday for a year. Pretty pathetic system if you ask me.