Hardly a straw man since you set your wife up in this spot (and maybe go try to answer some of my other far more insightful posts to you rather than focus on this incredibly minor one).
To be honest, I could care less about your wife since I'm talking to you which I felt I made clear when I said "Not that I think your wife is some sort of divine arbiter for all things women mind you. In fact I thought it was funny you basically said "Not-uh I asked my wife" as if that has some sort of major influence in the world." In another post to you.
This "3rd wave" feminism is the extreme crazy fringe virtually every movement has. They've been there since the beginning and they are no more indicative of the broader movement than people showing up at Tea Party rallies flying racist Obama banners.
In regards to people who want to latch on to what feminism's fringe movement is saying to redefine the word (It's stupid the number of Right wing females I've heard say "Now I'm not a feminist but (insert feminism)" they seem to fall into two categories as far as I've seen. The minority of them I feel just don't want female equality while the majority of them seem to just want something to be outraged about and what's easier to be outraged at then some fringe feminist who also wants to be outraged by everything.
Basically this shit is stupid internet drama for people who want drama. The shit both sides rail on about that I've seen is crap in terms of broad context.
What's with the "actual" before alt-righters and not SJW? I've had plenty of posts on slashdot lately where I've posted a comment about something sexists and rather than refute my points I've gotten knuckle draggers going "OH, SO WOMEN NEED PROTECTION, I THOUGHT THEY WERE EQUAL" when all I literally said was that something was sexist with absolutely no mention of needing to censor others or "protect women". Said comments seem to be the fashionable "wisdom" of the alt-right currently when confronted with any issue with women they don't like.
Is this the new alt-right thing? You can't call anything sexists because then you're saying women have to be protected which means you're undermining them?
I ask because I've seen this "thought" pop up a lot lately whenever some one suggests something is sexist.
Just a heads up, calling something or someone sexist doesn't equal, "women need to be protected". Thinking women shouldn't have to deal with sexism is not at all the same as thinking they can't handle themselves when confronted with it.
You're basically saying "the Left can't take a joke" and "the Left's jokes are too mean". Now I'm not commenting on the validity of your comments but do you not see the contridiction in what you're saying?
Russia has been engaged in highly substantial cyber warfare against Western targets for a number of years now (their involvement in the US election is just the tip of a very big iceberg). At long last they're getting a taste of their own medicine.
Sadly when Trump comes into office they are likely to be rewarded for their help to him in this election rather than be held to account for what they have been doing.
In fact, go ask your wife if you should be able to dismiss whatever she says on the grounds that you say she's on her period. Film it with your phone and post it on youtube for me.
She's going to either tell you that "you're full of shit" or she's a total door mat.
Does your wife also say that a female professional at the very top of her profession should have what she says undermined because she might be on her period rather than having her interview taken seriously and addressed directly? Does she also feel that this world class reporter would be so impaired by her period that she couldnt possibly conduct an interview mostly asking questions she and her staff had quite likely come up with days prior (she was interviewing a presidential nominee after all)?
Not that I think your wife is some sort of divine arbiter for all things women mind you. In fact I thought it was funny you basically said "Not-uh I asked my wife" as if that has some sort of major influence in the world.
Of course I never said she should be protected. You made that part up.
It's amazing the points you can make when you just make stuff up though. For instance, I feel like when you said that you were severely mentally deficient (retarded) you sort of left us not being able to take anything you say seriously.
I feel like you live on bad 80's sitcom, "women be crazy world". Maybe it's you and not half the population?
Regaurdless of all this, Trump refuting the substance of what she was saying by saying she was on the rag is sexist because he deflected what she was saying with a gender issue. He's undermining what she said, not by addressing what she said (which is how reasonable people talk to others) but by suggesting she was just having female issues, a claim he doesnt even have any evidence for.
It's also problematic to suggest a world class female professonal cant handle basic bodily functions that she has been dealing with since childhood. If her judgement became so poor she couldnt do her job every time she had her period she wouldnt be where she is today.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny, if you switch "conservative" for "liberal" or even maybe "liberals and moderates" in your statement you get a pretty insitefull comment
Talk about willful ignorance, if there's only one hospital to go to then there's no competition. No competition means whatever price they want.
Shit, I only had read the first few lines in the wikipedia article before i posted. Strange they describe the out of date deffinition first
Yes language changes but no this word has not changed meaning
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...
Hardly a straw man since you set your wife up in this spot (and maybe go try to answer some of my other far more insightful posts to you rather than focus on this incredibly minor one).
To be honest, I could care less about your wife since I'm talking to you which I felt I made clear when I said "Not that I think your wife is some sort of divine arbiter for all things women mind you. In fact I thought it was funny you basically said "Not-uh I asked my wife" as if that has some sort of major influence in the world." In another post to you.
This "3rd wave" feminism is the extreme crazy fringe virtually every movement has. They've been there since the beginning and they are no more indicative of the broader movement than people showing up at Tea Party rallies flying racist Obama banners.
In regards to people who want to latch on to what feminism's fringe movement is saying to redefine the word (It's stupid the number of Right wing females I've heard say "Now I'm not a feminist but (insert feminism)" they seem to fall into two categories as far as I've seen. The minority of them I feel just don't want female equality while the majority of them seem to just want something to be outraged about and what's easier to be outraged at then some fringe feminist who also wants to be outraged by everything.
Basically this shit is stupid internet drama for people who want drama. The shit both sides rail on about that I've seen is crap in terms of broad context.
Just a heads up, second world means communist country. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd world labeling system is not gradient in the way you have put it.
What's with the "actual" before alt-righters and not SJW? I've had plenty of posts on slashdot lately where I've posted a comment about something sexists and rather than refute my points I've gotten knuckle draggers going "OH, SO WOMEN NEED PROTECTION, I THOUGHT THEY WERE EQUAL" when all I literally said was that something was sexist with absolutely no mention of needing to censor others or "protect women". Said comments seem to be the fashionable "wisdom" of the alt-right currently when confronted with any issue with women they don't like.
I'd call them more inappropriate in a business context which is probably why they were pulled.
Is this the new alt-right thing? You can't call anything sexists because then you're saying women have to be protected which means you're undermining them?
I ask because I've seen this "thought" pop up a lot lately whenever some one suggests something is sexist.
Just a heads up, calling something or someone sexist doesn't equal, "women need to be protected". Thinking women shouldn't have to deal with sexism is not at all the same as thinking they can't handle themselves when confronted with it.
I love you for saying that. I've been interacting with too many people on here lately that desperately want to be offended.
Yeah but they were damned either way as now alt-righters have something to complain about.
In they end they probably decided they could have choosen better magazine that didnt have decades worth of association as a skin mag with it.
Shouldnt be that big of a deal either way really but I'm sure a few SJWs and alt-righters will try to make it one.
You're basically saying "the Left can't take a joke" and "the Left's jokes are too mean". Now I'm not commenting on the validity of your comments but do you not see the contridiction in what you're saying?
Please, it's not America's Left that has been getting help from Russia all this time. Far from it.
Russia has been engaged in highly substantial cyber warfare against Western targets for a number of years now (their involvement in the US election is just the tip of a very big iceberg). At long last they're getting a taste of their own medicine.
Sadly when Trump comes into office they are likely to be rewarded for their help to him in this election rather than be held to account for what they have been doing.
Hey no problem, let me know if you need any help reading in the future,
and the above post, the topic of the conversation, was one word.
Kind of a cut rate private school your parents sent you to there given that you werent able to infer that was the point.
And yet some how it manages to be more eloquent than yours.
The above just condensed your post down to it's one word base meaning.
Name calling.
Pretty sure we want Alaska's oil
Start World War 3... you're being rediculous.
Your post is blatantly flamebait doing nothing but putting idiotic words into the mouths of the Left that none of them are actually saying.
The West has to get its hits in now before Trump comes to office and rewards the Russians for their help during the election.
In fact, go ask your wife if you should be able to dismiss whatever she says on the grounds that you say she's on her period. Film it with your phone and post it on youtube for me.
She's going to either tell you that "you're full of shit" or she's a total door mat.
Does your wife also say that a female professional at the very top of her profession should have what she says undermined because she might be on her period rather than having her interview taken seriously and addressed directly? Does she also feel that this world class reporter would be so impaired by her period that she couldnt possibly conduct an interview mostly asking questions she and her staff had quite likely come up with days prior (she was interviewing a presidential nominee after all)?
Not that I think your wife is some sort of divine arbiter for all things women mind you. In fact I thought it was funny you basically said "Not-uh I asked my wife" as if that has some sort of major influence in the world.
Of course I never said she should be protected. You made that part up.
It's amazing the points you can make when you just make stuff up though. For instance, I feel like when you said that you were severely mentally deficient (retarded) you sort of left us not being able to take anything you say seriously.
I feel like you live on bad 80's sitcom, "women be crazy world". Maybe it's you and not half the population?
Regaurdless of all this, Trump refuting the substance of what she was saying by saying she was on the rag is sexist because he deflected what she was saying with a gender issue. He's undermining what she said, not by addressing what she said (which is how reasonable people talk to others) but by suggesting she was just having female issues, a claim he doesnt even have any evidence for.
It's also problematic to suggest a world class female professonal cant handle basic bodily functions that she has been dealing with since childhood. If her judgement became so poor she couldnt do her job every time she had her period she wouldnt be where she is today.