If they got that 20 cent genuine screw's sale price down to, I don't know, $1 or even lower, then the urge to fake it with a 10 cent screw is suddenly much less attractive...
Not that it isn't a huge problem anyway, but still. When you overprice shit like that you invite this kind of thing.
Was not aware of Certificate Patrol. Sounds useful... will look into that.
There's no PR though in what I'm thinking. All they would have to do is get their own CA trusted by a root trust, (which could have some PR) OR they could simply get their own installed in their target(s) browsers in which point they could issue any SSL cert they wanted without having to involve a third party.
Then, the MITM "proxy" would re-wrap the SSL with their own certificate. Google would be none the wiser, and the end user would be none the wiser if they did not take precautions.
A smarter man-in-the-middle would have their own CA in your trust store, so you still get your fancy SSL supposedly pointing to the same site, only singed by TheMan instead.
"Best" of both words - you still get an encrypted session to keep out the non-TheMan snoopers, and TheMan gets to watch you.
If it's NOT from the rover, and not from one of our past vehicles... just what is it from?
Though lets be honest - it looks to me like a bolt fell point-down into the dirt/sand. It's going to be... interesting... determining where it fell from, if it is from the rover.
Is there some reason this isn't the "default" distribution of it then? Nobody but QA testers and gentoo fans should be using the other one.
Javascript Frameworks for Javascript
I think you know what I want to say, here...
If they got that 20 cent genuine screw's sale price down to, I don't know, $1 or even lower, then the urge to fake it with a 10 cent screw is suddenly much less attractive...
Not that it isn't a huge problem anyway, but still. When you overprice shit like that you invite this kind of thing.
People should be shot for such bullshit. That kind of thing kills people.
I'd rather they took BOTH out back and shot them.
It's like the real-world equivalent of stumbleupon, only you lose your address bar and can't use a traditional search engine.
It's fun and all, but they keep dragging down other companies. Companies that just happened to fall for the bait.
Was not aware of Certificate Patrol. Sounds useful... will look into that.
There's no PR though in what I'm thinking. All they would have to do is get their own CA trusted by a root trust, (which could have some PR) OR they could simply get their own installed in their target(s) browsers in which point they could issue any SSL cert they wanted without having to involve a third party.
Then, the MITM "proxy" would re-wrap the SSL with their own certificate. Google would be none the wiser, and the end user would be none the wiser if they did not take precautions.
A smarter man-in-the-middle would have their own CA in your trust store, so you still get your fancy SSL supposedly pointing to the same site, only singed by TheMan instead.
"Best" of both words - you still get an encrypted session to keep out the non-TheMan snoopers, and TheMan gets to watch you.
MS really should just stop trying...
If anything they have overdiversified, and just about all of their markets are suffering because of it.
Also, switching from Android to an MS OS was also a critical design mistake - among those you already mentioned.
I'm sticking with my EVO 3D, thank you very much.
The patent is on how to do it with a computer; which is a different thing.
No, it isn't.
This is why we can't have nice things.
Great news everyone! The reapers are soooo tiny you'll squee when you see them!
Who is Slah, and why does he have dots?
The real trick though...
If it's NOT from the rover, and not from one of our past vehicles... just what is it from?
Though lets be honest - it looks to me like a bolt fell point-down into the dirt/sand. It's going to be... interesting... determining where it fell from, if it is from the rover.
There might have been some dirty dealings with Halliburton, but the Iraq War was far from a corporate conspiracy.
... after all, it's not a conspiracy if it's done out in the open.
Thanks, but I'd rather they didn't do it (as they didn't) - I don't care for the iPhone/iOS "experience" and I am not alone.
Once upon a time "he needed killing" used to be a justified defense.
Seems we could still use this, sometimes.
OK, so if you turn the windows into mirrors, how are they supposed to see?
If they can still see, they will see the light. It's not that the light is necessarily blinding, it's that it's distracting.
You expect those $5 Chinese lasers are going to have that implemented at all, let alone reliably?
Because headlines!
Why? Why was it not just reported/deleted and let be? Is there some primal need for them to toss people through the lawyer gauntlet?
Bwahahahaha!
I think you forgot what sites looked like back in the dialup days!
How about we take back some of 87.8 MHz to 108.0 MHz instead, since we're trolling?
Cell towers can and are cleverly disguised, and its easy to put them on tall buildings in ways that don't make them super-obvious.