So? Photons start striking an object. There's a "front" moving across that object as the photons hit it, assuming it wasn't perpendicular to the emitter.
There's no reason you shouldn't be able to see this... as you would see those photons moving across that front that reflected back towards the sensing device (camera)
So, you are saying that the pursuit of understanding isn't valid? That's quite short-sighted. You can't get from A to C without first obtaining C, and there might be a D that you can't see until you get to C.
So, why would I read a book about motorcycle maintenance when I have little interest in motorcycles or the maintenance of internal combustion engines (and associated machinery)?
Slashdot Mirror
... I love it when people rename things.
My mistake.
... and I remember when people used to read.
It's not the completed application exceeding the limit, it's the resource usage of the build environment.
So? The compiler/linker isn't (or it shouldn't be) a 32-bit process.
This is during compilation. Meaning, a 32-bit machine can no longer compile it. A 64-bit machine can produce a working 32-bit build just fine.
It's the build environment, not the project itself.
"Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement."
APRS is "Automatic Position Reporting System" per the creator. Wikipedia has the name wrong.
Why yes, I am a HAM. I hold a General ticket.
Oh. Just in case you want to look at what Wikipedia's doing: Extension:VisualEditor.
Funny, you must not have looked very hard. There was also FCKeditor before that.
No, you wouldn't get off "scot-free" (a stupid term, go look it up :P) - at best you'd get involuntary manslaughter, I would expect.
Of course, that's assuming the photon is converted into a photoelectron by the photocathode
... which in turn alters the object/system under observation?
So? Photons start striking an object. There's a "front" moving across that object as the photons hit it, assuming it wasn't perpendicular to the emitter.
There's no reason you shouldn't be able to see this... as you would see those photons moving across that front that reflected back towards the sensing device (camera)
Yea, and you've never fired a weapon in an enclosed space have you? Stop talking about shit you know nothing about.
Robin Williams said it best: "I've got a nail file! I can be irritating!"
Can't tell if should get back to 4chan.
No, wait. I can. Go back to 4chan.
Thanks, but I'd rather be bathed in baseball-bat bludgeon-blood than have my eardrums blown out.
Firearms do not belong on planes, and a good club can maim someone just as well.
Good luck with that. The moment you propose such a thing the "true red-blooded patriots" come running.
Well, you can unfuck hardware with software (see the last paragraph of the linked section).
...I eventually flashed it ... a really weird filesystem on that phone that had to be dealt with first...
Then you weren't flashing it, you were just dumping an archive into a filesystem.
Blocked and/or the browser is configured not to animate them.
This isn't 1998, animated GIFs don't have a place here anymore.
I think you are putting the chicken before the egg.
Religion didn't just spontaneously appear - it's our capacity to even conceptualize it that marks us out.
Er... that should read "from A to C without first obtaining B"
So, you are saying that the pursuit of understanding isn't valid? That's quite short-sighted. You can't get from A to C without first obtaining C, and there might be a D that you can't see until you get to C.
Keep in mind that the 'distress' these rats face is merely the fact that it is in a small compartment ("tube"). It's hardly being tortured.
Funny how much of a pain it is to learn something new when you fail to do any sort of research before diving in...
So, why would I read a book about motorcycle maintenance when I have little interest in motorcycles or the maintenance of internal combustion engines (and associated machinery)?