No, it doesn't. We don't have a typographical function to denote sarcasm. Sorry, but just making shit up on the spot doesn't work (unless you make it obvious and expand '/s' to '/sarcasm' - which makes the poster just lazy)
Doesn't matter what you feel, the fact was he didn't have a permit to park in those spots and was thus in violation of law. Whether or not he could have had a permit (had he applied) doesn't matter. A double amputee couldn't park there without one.
EVERY time I've flown Southwest my baggage went somewhere else, and my sample size is about 5 round-trips scattered over a period of years.
I'll take a 30 minute delay (which BTW, usually has to do with Yokels on the tarmac and less to do with the airline, because I do listen to ramp chatter and ground control while I'm waiting) over a game of "Where In The World Is My Friggin' Luggage?"
standard Linux distributions because all of the barely-tested half-baked crap added to a default install.
Please explain how this has any bearing on an embedded distribution maintained by a rather large public company? This isn't Ubuntu we're talking about.
That doesn't excuse you from completely ignoring the denotative definition of a word. The issue is that the "unused" and ignored is done so BECAUSE it is redundant. It's a causal relationship. The words are not synonyms.
I will NEVER use duckduckgo. Why? Well, brace yourself, because this is very shallow and stupid.
Because of the horribly stupid name. That's it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who "boycotts" products/services over such a thing, so let it be a lesson: choose your name at least somewhat carefully.
Time to start paying more attention to who you vote for. And to start educating them about technology and how it should be used and not abused. But I'm afraid it's already too late.
When has it NEVER been time to do that? It's unfortunate that everyone seems to believe the time to do so is at some point in the future, excepting the few who think "now" and the even fewer who think "always."
... first time I've ever seen it, and I hardly live under a rock.
Well, you've got a heat sink, a heat pipe... where's the heat toilet? It's probably backed up again.
No, it doesn't. We don't have a typographical function to denote sarcasm. Sorry, but just making shit up on the spot doesn't work (unless you make it obvious and expand '/s' to '/sarcasm' - which makes the poster just lazy)
Hmm. Your right.
Well, good. :D
Hmm, very good point. Though doing this properly might be "difficult" (to put it lightly)
WTF did you put this in idle for? The place slashcode goes to, well, break.
How odd, you're standing next to him as well.
Not possible, unless your receiver is also directional (or you have three of them suitably far apart)
Look at you, bleeding all over the carpet. How rude of you! You could at least go bleed on the tile!
It has happened, especially because without the tag someone "not in the know" wouldn't realize it was The Boss' car.
Doesn't matter what you feel, the fact was he didn't have a permit to park in those spots and was thus in violation of law. Whether or not he could have had a permit (had he applied) doesn't matter. A double amputee couldn't park there without one.
Sounds like SOP for Boeing.
EVERY time I've flown Southwest my baggage went somewhere else, and my sample size is about 5 round-trips scattered over a period of years.
I'll take a 30 minute delay (which BTW, usually has to do with Yokels on the tarmac and less to do with the airline, because I do listen to ramp chatter and ground control while I'm waiting) over a game of "Where In The World Is My Friggin' Luggage?"
Try that again. Last time I flew it was $25 for the bag, period. I had one bag to check, and it was NOT oversized OR overweight.
standard Linux distributions because all of the barely-tested half-baked crap added to a default install.
Please explain how this has any bearing on an embedded distribution maintained by a rather large public company? This isn't Ubuntu we're talking about.
That doesn't excuse you from completely ignoring the denotative definition of a word. The issue is that the "unused" and ignored is done so BECAUSE it is redundant. It's a causal relationship. The words are not synonyms.
No worries, I'll leave some donuts in the fridge.
Yea, well, Keep this in mind.
I will NEVER use duckduckgo. Why? Well, brace yourself, because this is very shallow and stupid.
Because of the horribly stupid name. That's it. I'm sure I'm not the only one who "boycotts" products/services over such a thing, so let it be a lesson: choose your name at least somewhat carefully.
Time to start paying more attention to who you vote for. And to start educating them about technology and how it should be used and not abused. But I'm afraid it's already too late.
When has it NEVER been time to do that? It's unfortunate that everyone seems to believe the time to do so is at some point in the future, excepting the few who think "now" and the even fewer who think "always."
I see a problem here. Your statement implies that intelligence is compatible with troll when it clearly is not.
Fox News, your televised tabloid!
I already do this for my server.
Sorry, China. Your people have no need to be accessing my resources, so they won't be.
Indeed. At what point do interesting stories and allegory turn into rumor?
You won't.
While there's plenty of bullshit actually in existence, there's far more of it spoken online.